Long paper
The Binary Totient Series
Summary. The dyadic totient sections through level
Start here, by the editorial route
In this paper
Relations between the representations
Binary tails, Möbius sums, rational approximations and exponential
sums express related information about
- Binary-weighted series and tails.
-
The coefficients in
are unbounded; this expression is not the base-two digit expansion of . The tail , finite difference numerator and test retain this coefficient information. The identity(
tsum_totient_half_pow_eq_half_add_moebius_sq) and its partial-sum version (mobius_square_series_eq_partial_add_tail) express the same value by Möbius sums. An equality of values does not by itself transfer a claim about the original coefficient subsequences. - Lambert sums and finite numerator polynomials.
-
The Lambert identities for
, and give the series relations in Section 5. For a finite divisor sum, the polynomial evaluation (mobiusNumeratorPolynomial_eval_two) and the definition (mobiusNumerator) put its numerator into integer polynomial arithmetic. This evaluates a finite contribution, not the complementary infinite tail. - Coprimality probability.
-
Let
be independent with for . Then . The divisibility probabilities are (tsum_pos_pair_both_dvd_half_eq_inv_mersenne_sq). Möbius inversion converts these to the coprimality probability. The decomposition by the greatest common divisor also gives the weighted coprime-pair identity (tsum_pos_coprime_inv_mersenne_eq_one). Counting coprime pairs by their sum gives the totient expression directly (tsum_coprime_pair_pow_eq_tsum_totient_mul_pow). - Cyclotomic factors of finite denominators.
-
The coefficient formula for
(mobiusNumeratorPolynomial_coeff) and the cyclotomic divisibility statement (cyclotomicValue_dvd_baseMobiusShadow_den) identify factors in the reduced denominators of the specified finite sums. The product-divisibility theorem (upperHalfChannel_product_dvd_den_of_scale_primeFactors_le) is used in the exact denominator formula (lcmHeight_scaledMobiusShadow_den_exact). Growing finite denominators alone do not exclude cancellation with the remaining tail. - Numerator divisibility and denominator bounds.
-
Write
in lowest terms, with . For and a positive divisor of , if the reduced denominator of divides , then (scalarLocalization_complement_dvd). In particular, when . A related bound isfor integers
(positiveRat_mersenne_height). Here positivity gives ; the size inequality then gives the conclusion. These are arithmetic bounds on a reduced fraction, not irrationality criteria without an additional approximation estimate. - Farey intervals.
-
The denominator bound (
farey_gap) applied to the explicit window gives (gap_check_window_1_240_le_79639646646701375323355774875831053) and hence for integers and . The finite input is a totient numerator modulo . Its exact first failing denominator is , the denominator of the relevant Farey mediant (gap_check_window_1_240_first_failure). This last assertion concerns this fixed window. - Differences at least-common-multiple shifts.
-
For
(periodLcm), a jump in can occur only at a prime power (eq_prime_pow_of_not_dvd_periodLcm). The identities (lcmRayArithmeticLetter_eq_deltaTotient) and (diagonalWindowIncrement_eq_lcmRayArithmeticLetter) identify the coefficient difference as and give . Thus these arithmetic formulas concern particular instances of the same finite residue test; additional window restrictions remain in force. - Exponential sums of the window residues.
-
For integers
, the relevant block statistic isA bound by
, together with and , yields a certificate in the block (exists_certifiedKill_of_first_harmonic_gap). The linked irrationality implication uses the stronger complex norm bound , for every on arbitrarily late blocks satisfying the same size inequality (irrational_totient_series_of_first_harmonic_norm_gap). The finite implication uses ; the required cancellation bound is still unproved. The norm bound on the complex exponential sum is sufficient for the displayed real-part bound, but is stronger.
Binary tails and Möbius sums
Erdős’s argument for
A different proposal would recover each later block from a fixed
finite summary of the preceding history. The counterexample of
Proposition 2.11(i) (balancedPulse_no_autonomous_decoder)
shows why that proposal fails for the family constructed there. For
The implication from the quantified certificate condition (irrational_totient_series_of_certificate_supply)
is a separate theorem. The counterexample above neither proves its
hypothesis nor makes it the only possible route to irrationality.
Likewise, Proposition 10.4
shows that inverse-phase column weights can preserve a determinant, and
Theorem 6.3
gives the exact growing ranks of totient sections. These are different
statements with different hypotheses; none is a general prohibition on
other representations of
The Möbius representation instead allows the squared-Lambert identity
of Proposition 5.16 to be applied to
About this paper
Authorship and AI use. Will Cook built and directed the research infrastructure and maintains the public release. He reviewed claims when he could. AI agents did most of the research and drafting. Cook did not independently verify every claim.
Cite and contact. Cite this paper by its title, author and date above, with its PDF; cite the earlier sources it uses for a mathematical result. For software, use the release citation and give the commit used. Contact Will with questions or corrections.
Prefer the manuscript?
Equations typeset from the exact TeX. Rendered from the LaTeX manuscript source with file fingerprint sha256:2be13b340f9dafc4. Its file fingerprint matched the published source record, so the PDF above, the LaTeX, and this page are one manuscript. Redeploying the site regenerates this page from whatever the public repository holds at that moment.