Plectis

Long paper

The Binary Totient Series

Erdős #249 By July 2026; revised 1 October 2026 Authorship, AI use and citation

Summary. The dyadic totient sections through level e≥1 have an explicit rational basis of size 2e+1. Truncating a scaled tail difference produces an integer whose residue certifies nonintegrality when its distances from both endpoints of the residue interval exceed an explicit error bound. The record develops the resulting finite denominator exclusions, equivalent residue criteria, and sufficient exponential-sum estimates. Rational comparison sequences identify the limitations of particular size, parity, rank, and finite-prefix arguments. The short paper supplies the all-base basis theorem; here each conditional result carries the arithmetic hypothesis still needed to apply it. Those hypotheses are not established in the form required to prove irrationality of S=∑ φ(n)2−n.

This paper covers a claim-bounded problem-specific reasoning surface for Erdős #249: selected checked premises, finite certificates, closed routes, surviving obligations, and their exact evidence bands.

It does not establish the validity of claims tagged Lean, which belongs to the cited kernel-checked source, or a solution to Erdős #249, which remains open.

In this paper

Relations between the representations

Binary tails, Möbius sums, rational approximations and exponential sums express related information about S. We give the identities that connect them and then check which assumptions survive each change. This is necessary before transferring a counterexample to another representation, as the finite-state decoding and polynomial denominator examples illustrate.

Binary-weighted series and tails.

The coefficients in S=∑n≥1φ(n)2−n are unbounded; this expression is not the base-two digit expansion of S. The tail RN, finite difference numerator D(h,N,L) and test C(h,N,L) retain this coefficient information. The identity

S=12+∑d≥1μ(d)(2d−1)2

(tsum_totient_half_pow_eq_half_add_moebius_sq) and its partial-sum version (mobius_square_series_eq_partial_add_tail) express the same value by Möbius sums. An equality of values does not by itself transfer a claim about the original coefficient subsequences.

Lambert sums and finite numerator polynomials.

The Lambert identities for μ, 1 and φ give the series relations in Section 5. For a finite divisor sum, the polynomial evaluation (mobiusNumeratorPolynomial_eval_two) and the definition (mobiusNumerator) put its numerator into integer polynomial arithmetic. This evaluates a finite contribution, not the complementary infinite tail.

Coprimality probability.

Let X,Y be independent with Pr(X=n)=Pr(Y=n)=2−n for n≥1. Then S−12=Pr(gcd(X,Y)=1). The divisibility probabilities are Pr(d∣X, d∣Y)=(2d−1)−2 (tsum_pos_pair_both_dvd_half_eq_inv_mersenne_sq). Möbius inversion converts these to the coprimality probability. The decomposition by the greatest common divisor also gives the weighted coprime-pair identity (tsum_pos_coprime_inv_mersenne_eq_one). Counting coprime pairs by their sum gives the totient expression directly (tsum_coprime_pair_pow_eq_tsum_totient_mul_pow).

Cyclotomic factors of finite denominators.

The coefficient formula for Pr (mobiusNumeratorPolynomial_coeff) and the cyclotomic divisibility statement (cyclotomicValue_dvd_baseMobiusShadow_den) identify factors in the reduced denominators of the specified finite sums. The product-divisibility theorem (upperHalfChannel_product_dvd_den_of_scale_primeFactors_le) is used in the exact denominator formula (lcmHeight_scaledMobiusShadow_den_exact). Growing finite denominators alone do not exclude cancellation with the remaining tail.

Numerator divisibility and denominator bounds.

Write x=a/b in lowest terms, with b>0. For c∈Z and a positive divisor H of b, if the reduced denominator of cx divides H, then b/H∣c (scalarLocalization_complement_dvd). In particular, |c|≥b/H when c≠0. A related bound is

0<ab<22n−1,2r∣a,n≥1⟹2r(2n−1)<2b

for integers r≥0 (positiveRat_mersenne_height). Here positivity gives a≥2r; the size inequality then gives the conclusion. These are arithmetic bounds on a reduced fraction, not irrationality criteria without an additional approximation estimate.

Farey intervals.

The denominator bound (farey_gap) applied to the explicit window (N,K)=(1,240) gives (gap_check_window_1_240_le_79639646646701375323355774875831053) and hence S≠p/q for integers p and 1≤q≤Q0. The finite input is a totient numerator modulo 2240. Its exact first failing denominator is Q0+1, the denominator of the relevant Farey mediant (gap_check_window_1_240_first_failure). This last assertion concerns this fixed window.

Differences at least-common-multiple shifts.

For Ht=lcm⁡(1,…,t) (periodLcm), a jump in Ht can occur only at a prime power (eq_prime_pow_of_not_dvd_periodLcm). The identities (lcmRayArithmeticLetter_eq_deltaTotient) and (diagonalWindowIncrement_eq_lcmRayArithmeticLetter) identify the coefficient difference as δt(j)=φ(2Ht+j)−φ(Ht+j) and give D(Ht,Ht,L)=∑j=1Lδt(j)2L−j. Thus these arithmetic formulas concern particular instances of the same finite residue test; additional window restrictions remain in force.

Exponential sums of the window residues.

For integers h,X≥1, the relevant block statistic is

∑N=X2X−1cos(2πD(h,N,L)2L).

A bound by 9X/10, together with L≥h and 16(2X+h+L+2)≤2L, yields a certificate in the block (exists_certifiedKill_of_first_harmonic_gap). The linked irrationality implication uses the stronger complex norm bound 21X/25, for every h on arbitrarily late blocks satisfying the same size inequality (irrational_totient_series_of_first_harmonic_norm_gap). The finite implication uses cos⁡(π/8)>9/10; the required cancellation bound is still unproved. The norm bound on the complex exponential sum is sufficient for the displayed real-part bound, but is stronger.

Binary tails and Möbius sums

Erdős’s argument for ∑n1/(2n−1) chooses congruences so that divisor counts along a block are divisible by increasing powers of the base. A tail bound then forces a long run of zero digits [11]. It uses no finite automaton.

A different proposal would recover each later block from a fixed finite summary of the preceding history. The counterexample of Proposition 2.11(i) (balancedPulse_no_autonomous_decoder) shows why that proposal fails for the family constructed there. For m≥2, its members have the same earlier history but different successors. A state that identifies all those histories cannot recover every successor. More generally, an exact label-and-decoder pair for that family needs at least ⌊(m+1)/2⌋+1 distinct labels. This is a lower bound on the number of labels, not a linear lower bound on the number of bits, and it is not a state-complexity theorem for the actual totient sequence.

The implication from the quantified certificate condition (irrational_totient_series_of_certificate_supply) is a separate theorem. The counterexample above neither proves its hypothesis nor makes it the only possible route to irrationality. Likewise, Proposition 10.4 shows that inverse-phase column weights can preserve a determinant, and Theorem 6.3 gives the exact growing ranks of totient sections. These are different statements with different hypotheses; none is a general prohibition on other representations of S.

The Möbius representation instead allows the squared-Lambert identity of Proposition 5.16 to be applied to μ, since |μ(d)|≤d for d≥1. The polynomial identities of Propositions 6.37–6.41 operate at each finite radical without an autonomous decoder. The exact reduced denominator and its lower bound are then given by Propositions 6.8 and 6.7. Those formulas concern a finite rational contribution. They do not exclude cancellation by the complementary tail and hence do not settle irrationality. The representations are equal expressions for S; what differs is the information supplied by the particular arguments.

About this paper

Authorship and AI use. Will Cook built and directed the research infrastructure and maintains the public release. He reviewed claims when he could. AI agents did most of the research and drafting. Cook did not independently verify every claim.

Cite and contact. Cite this paper by its title, author and date above, with its PDF; cite the earlier sources it uses for a mathematical result. For software, use the release citation and give the commit used. Contact Will with questions or corrections.

Prefer the manuscript?

Equations typeset from the exact TeX. Rendered from the LaTeX manuscript source with file fingerprint sha256:2be13b340f9dafc4. Its file fingerprint matched the published source record, so the PDF above, the LaTeX, and this page are one manuscript. Redeploying the site regenerates this page from whatever the public repository holds at that moment.