The coordinatewise divisibility corridor is impossible at base 3/2.
This excludes one proof architecture and proves no irrationality statement.
For which rational bases is the corresponding series irrational? The smallest resistant explicit base is three halves.
Statements and boundaries are copied from the corpus record. Registry status: not_registered; the claim registry does not carry these declarations and kernel checking them does not promote them into reviewed public claims
The coordinatewise divisibility corridor is impossible at base 3/2.
This excludes one proof architecture and proves no irrationality statement.
The rational-base cleared tail obeys its exact first-order recurrence.
The recurrence is not derived from a rationality contradiction.
Prove any one of these and the corresponding reduction above becomes unconditional.
three_halves_growing_rank_endpoint_jet_kernel After dividing every coefficient pair by its rowwise common content, at positive quadratic target depths R_n,S_n exhibit at least 4R_n+2S_n primitive coefficient pairs from a genuinely non-collapsed deformation, prove that the required two-adic and three-adic gain survives primitive normalisation, and prove that at least one resulting checked {-1,0,1} collision has a nonzero polynomial pair and lies outside the analytic remainder nullspace; or prove an exact rank obstruction.| Module | Lines | Declarations | Theorems |
|---|---|---|---|
ErdosProblems.Erdos1049.RationalBaseLambert |
223 | 16 | 11 |
ErdosProblems.Erdos1049.RationalPadeArithmetic |
222 | 19 | 14 |
ErdosProblems.Erdos1049.ZudilinConeArithmetic |
450 | 36 | 25 |
ErdosProblems.Erdos1049.HermitePadeNoGo |
153 | 10 | 5 |
ErdosProblems.Erdos1049.ZudilinHeightRegion |
143 | 13 | 12 |
ErdosProblems.Erdos1049.QAperyDiagonalNonEquivalence |
102 | 11 | 4 |
The Comparator replays selected exact interfaces against a pinned toolchain. It never widens what Lean proved.
Statement and type parity replayed against the pinned toolchain.
The coordinatewise corridor forces a power-versus-linear inequality and cannot occur at base 3/2.
This excludes one proof architecture and proves no irrationality statement.
coordinatewise_corridor_no_go · targeted
The exact rational-base cleared-tail recurrence exposes exponential denominator-base forcing absent at integer bases.
The recurrence is not derived from a rationality contradiction.
rational_base_tail_recurrence · targeted
Covered through a neighbouring selected interface, not replayed one-to-one.
Integer scalar content changes analytic error and exterior determinant by matching factors, yielding no margin by itself.
The conclusion is scoped to one normalisation strategy.
scalar_content_no_go · represented_by_selected_coordinatewise_no_go
Endpoint residues at 2 and 3 exclude a common multiplier under unit-endpoint hypotheses.
Other local or cross-row arithmetic remains possible.
endpoint_residues · represented_by_selected_coordinatewise_no_go
Stated in the corpus; not part of the replayed interface set.
Binary selectors collide in the four-jet signature at the stated rank and depth.
A signed relation is not nonzero analytic data.
four_jet_collision · not_selected_finite_combinatorial_family
Irrationality at 7/2 is obtained from an external analytic criterion whose elementary height hypothesis is checked in Lean.
Comparator may check the height inequality, not the cited theorem application.
seven_halves_irrationality · not_applicable_to_external_irrationality_conclusion
Exact height-region inclusions and exclusions, Padé denominator-exponent bounds, and a rectangular Hermite-Padé threshold no-go are checked.
The analytic remainder and nonvanishing input remain untreated.
height_and_pade_arithmetic · not_selected_multiple_scoped_arithmetic_families
Arithmetic Boundaries at Base 3/2
At the resistant base 3/2, Lean rules out two common-width linear-form mechanisms: scalar content gives no net local-to-Archimedean gain, and unit endpoints exclude both 3 and 2 from a common divisor. A four-jet count constructs a signed relation but not a nonzero analytic remainder; direct cut-level clearing also incurs an exponential denominator factor and an impossible corridor inequality. The elementary 7/2 height bound is formalised, but the published analytic criterion remains external. These are construction-specific exclusions, not an irrationality result; Erdős #1049 remains open.