The smallest displayed 2,3,5 kernel minor is exactly -1/15.
Failure of rank one does not imply irrationality.
For a finite set of at least two primes, is the sum of reciprocals of the running least common multiples of the smooth numbers irrational? This library treats the three-prime case.
Statements and boundaries are copied from the corpus record. Registry status: not_registered; the claim registry does not carry these declarations and kernel checking them does not promote them into reviewed public claims
The smallest displayed 2,3,5 kernel minor is exactly -1/15.
Failure of rank one does not imply irrationality.
The running lcm of the three-prime smooth prefix equals the exact coordinatewise height.
The identity does not supply the missing irrationality bridge.
Prove any one of these and the corresponding reduction above becomes unconditional.
actual_local_window_residue_escape For every positive B coprime to 30 and every starting index, produce a later actual {2,3,5} window whose least positive forcing residue exceeds the exact denominator-dependent carry bound.actual_rational_carry_instantiation Identify the formal radix word with the checked four-symbol dyadic block base, formalize the exact block digit and its link to the original summand multiplicities, and derive the positive reduced carry recurrence and its bound from a hypothetical rational value.nonstationary_analytic_theorem Prove a genuinely higher-dimensional analytic theorem for the phase cocycle or the associated contraction.unbounded_height_certificate Replace one finite denominator exclusion by a family whose exclusion bound tends to infinity.The integer-only dyadic-window checker reproduces three exact packet certificates and, for all 106,666 pairs with denominator B <= 1000 coprime to 30 and dyadic start 100 <= a <= 500, finds an escaping window of length at most 18; the largest first successful length is 14. This is finite proof-consumer evidence only and proves neither unbounded-denominator nor cofinal escape.
| Module | Lines | Declarations | Theorems |
|---|---|---|---|
ErdosProblems.Erdos269.ThreePrimeRunningLcm |
729 | 50 | 34 |
ErdosProblems.Erdos269.ResidueEscape |
164 | 8 | 6 |
ErdosProblems.Erdos269.RestrictedFloorSum |
683 | 42 | 29 |
ErdosProblems.Erdos269.BoundedRadixTailEscape |
207 | 6 | 4 |
ErdosProblems.Erdos269.CarryLiftExtinction |
351 | 14 | 12 |
ErdosProblems.Erdos269.ThreeChannelBlockRigidity |
128 | 6 | 4 |
ErdosProblems.Erdos269.WeightedPhaseCarry |
371 | 23 | 14 |
The Comparator replays selected exact interfaces against a pinned toolchain. It never widens what Lean proved.
Statement and type parity replayed against the pinned toolchain.
Exact running-LCM product, logarithmic-cell constancy, coordinate jump ratios, and jump count.
Cell structure alone does not prove irrationality.
three_prime_lcm_cells · targeted_running_lcm_identity
The 2,3,5 kernel is not rank one and its smallest displayed minor equals -1/15.
Failure of rank one does not itself imply irrationality.
rank_two_kernel_no_go · targeted
Covered through a neighbouring selected interface, not replayed one-to-one.
Finite height-fibre normal form and a quadratic smooth-shell multiplicity bound.
The fibre bounds do not provide the missing divisibility bridge.
height_fibre_and_shell · represented_by_three_prime_structure_target
The exact dyadic block alphabet is 2, 6, 10, and 30.
The finite alphabet does not supply the needed carry escape.
dyadic_block_alphabet · represented_by_three_prime_structure_target
Stated in the corpus; not part of the replayed interface set.
Both two-prime running-lcm series are proved transcendental by an authored deduction from an external theorem.
Comparator cannot certify the external analytic input.
two_prime_transcendence · not_applicable_not_a_lean_declaration
Cofinal local-window residue escape would rule out bounded positive carries after an unproved rationality-to-carry bridge.
The producer and actual-series identification are missing.
conditional_carry_escape · not_selected_unproved_bridge_and_deep_predicates
A local-window checker searches 106666 denominator and start pairs and records small certificates.
Finite search is not a cofinal statement.
three_prime_finite_search · not_applicable_not_a_lean_theorem
The Three-Prime Running Least Common Multiple
For every pair of distinct primes, both the de-duplicated sum and Erdős's repeated running-lcm sum are proved transcendental by a paper argument using Bugeaud–Laurent; that deduction is not Lean-formalised, and Steve Fan published the same two-prime reduction first, on 26 June 2026, so no priority is claimed for it. For three primes, Lean gives the exact running-lcm product, logarithmic cells, shell bounds, the four-value radix at 2, 3, 5, and a rank-two nonseparability witness. The remaining criterion is conditional: its rationality-to-carry divisibility bridge and cofinal residue escape are unproved, while the reported scan is finite. Erdős #269 remains open from three primes onward.