The consecutive prime gaps are unbounded.
Unbounded coefficients alone do not force irrationality.
Is the dyadic series sum p_n/2^n over consecutive primes irrational? Equivalently, is the corresponding consecutive-prime-gap dyadic series irrational?
Statements and boundaries are copied from the corpus record. Registry status: not_registered; the claim registry does not carry these declarations and kernel checking them does not promote them into reviewed public claims
The consecutive prime gaps are unbounded.
Unbounded coefficients alone do not force irrationality.
The prime-value dyadic series is irrational exactly when the prime-gap dyadic series is irrational.
The equivalence does not prove irrationality of either series.
Prove any one of these and the corresponding reduction above becomes unconditional.
prime_gap_cofinal_shift_escape For every fixed h >= 1 and every N0, find N >= N0 for which sum_{j>=1} (g_{N+h+j}-g_{N+j})/2^j is not an integer.cofinal_adjacent_small_mismatch For every fixed h >= 1 and every N0, find N >= N0 such that both adjacent full tail shifts have absolute value less than 1 and g_{N+h+1} != g_{N+1}. The checked local consumer then excludes eventual integrality of the h-shift.actual_prime_gap_tail_formal_bridge Formalise summability of the actual prime and prime-gap dyadic series and identify the concrete infinite prime-gap tail with the checked real/rational dyadic recurrence, so the local consumer reaches the target series without a paper-only analytic bridge.| Module | Lines | Declarations | Theorems |
|---|---|---|---|
ErdosProblems.Erdos251.PrimeGapDyadicTail |
1584 | 104 | 82 |
The Comparator replays selected exact interfaces against a pinned toolchain. It never widens what Lean proved.
Statement and type parity replayed against the pinned toolchain.
Exact finite summation by parts, the unconditional infinite prime-gap identity, and irrationality equivalence.
The equivalence does not prove irrationality of either series.
prime_gap_reformulation · targeted
Prime gaps are unbounded and non-eventually-periodic, while an explicit nonperiodic unbounded countermodel still has rational sum.
Comparator checks the exact theorem, not the broader methodological interpretation.
coefficient_only_no_go · targeted_unboundedness_theorem_only
Covered through a neighbouring selected interface, not replayed one-to-one.
Odd rational denominators give totient-length integral shifts, and integrality propagates through the recurrence.
This describes rational states and supplies no contradiction for actual prime gaps.
totient_shift_propagation · represented_by_integral_shift_family
Stated in the corpus; not part of the replayed interface set.
Block identities and exact denominator criteria classify rationality through integral positive tail shifts.
The concrete prime-gap producer remains missing.
integral_shift_classification · not_selected_abstract_family_represented_in_manifest
Cofinal adjacent small mismatches would rule out eventual integral shifts for the prime-gap tail.
The cofinal mismatch producer is unproved.
small_mismatch_criterion · not_selected_open_producer_hypothesis
An Integral-Shift Criterion for Dyadic Tail Recurrences
For any sequence obeying the dyadic recurrence with integer digits, a shift of length h is an integer exactly when one explicit multiple of the term is, and integrality then propagates to every later index; over the reals the contrapositive is an irrationality criterion. Applied to the prime-gap series, and conditional on a summability input the prime number theorem supplies but which is not formalised here, this makes the remaining obligation exact: cofinal non-integrality for every fixed h. Exact order-lattice and factorial-diagonal theorems then show that adaptive affine shifts and every fixed affine cylinder collapse rather than produce that obligation. These are scoped no-go results, not an irrationality proof; Erdős #251 stays open.