Plectis

Short paper

Irrationality criteria for Lambert subseries

Summary. The series ∑a∈A(ba−1)−1 is irrational for every integer b≥2 and infinite A contained in E∪V when E satisfies a finite-prime weighted summability condition and V has a summable positive divisor cover. The two classes are incomparable, and their union reaches supports in neither class. A common average over dyadic lengths produces one index with both displacements small. Arbitrary infinite supports at base two remain unresolved.

This paper covers the weighted, divisor-cover and mixed support criteria with complete proofs and method limits; the long paper treats finite denominators, the achievement set and rational membership.

It does not establish the validity of claims tagged Lean, which belongs to the cited kernel-checked source, or a solution to Erdős #257, which remains open.

In this paper

Finite-support denominator periods

The least common multiple of the selected exponents survives cancellation as the multiplicative order of the base modulo the reduced denominator.

Theorem B.1 (the exact denominator period). Let F⊆N>0 be finite and nonempty, let b≥2 be an integer, and let DF>0 be the denominator of XF(b) in lowest terms. Then DF is coprime to b, and

ordDF⁡(b)=lcm⁡{n:n∈F}.

If moreover lcm⁡(F)≥2, then lcm⁡(F)<DF. We use ord1⁡(b)=1, so the statement includes F={1} at b=2.

Put L=lcm⁡(F). Clearing denominators gives DF∣bL−1, so the upper divisibility for the order is immediate. For the reverse, fix a divisibility-maximal n∈F with n≥2 and choose a prime ℓ∣Φn(b). With e=vℓ(bn−1), the cyclotomic fact in Section E gives ordℓe⁡(b)=n for the full prime power ℓe. Every other selected exponent m has n∤m, hence vℓ(bm−1)<e. The nth summand has uniquely smallest ℓ-adic valuation and cannot cancel. Thus ℓe∣DF and n∣ordDF⁡(b). Taking all maximal selected exponents proves the order statement; the size bound follows from ordDF⁡(b)∣φ(DF)<DF when L≥2. The case F={1} has order one directly.

The unique-valuation argument also permits signs ±1 on the finite summands. This signed extension is not included in the formal statement. The distinction between primes and prime powers is visible in

X{2,3}(2)=1021,X{2,6}(2)=2263.

In both examples 2 has multiplicative order six modulo the denominator. The first combines orders two and three; the second retains the order-six prime power 9, although no prime divisor of 63 has order six. The boundary F={1} at base two has DF=L=1. These lower denominator bounds give no upper height control for infinite partial sums and do not decide an infinite-support value. Van Assche instead constructs approximants for the full Lambert series and proves both nonvanishing and decay of the associated integer linear forms [14]. That approximation mechanism does not follow from denominator survival alone.

In particular, 1/21 is not a finite subseries sum. If it were, the order of 2 modulo 21 would force every selected exponent to divide 6. The exponent 1 is excluded since its weight is 1. Any sum containing 2 or 3 exceeds 1/21, whereas the only nonzero remaining sum is 1/63, from the exponent 6. This will distinguish finite and infinite representations in the next appendix.

About this paper

Authorship and AI use. Will Cook built and directed the research infrastructure and maintains the public release. He reviewed claims when he could. AI agents did most of the research and drafting. Cook did not independently verify every claim.

Cite and contact. Cite this paper by its title, author and date above, with its PDF; cite the earlier sources it uses for a mathematical result. For software, use the release citation and give the commit used. Contact Will with questions or corrections.

Prefer the manuscript?

Equations typeset from the exact TeX. Rendered from the LaTeX manuscript source with file fingerprint sha256:2676b3e9f6a5ba6f. Its file fingerprint matched the published source record, so the PDF above, the LaTeX, and this page are one manuscript. Redeploying the site regenerates this page from whatever the public repository holds at that moment.