Plectis

Long paper

Paths in Polynomial Lemniscates: A Degree-Seven Counterexample and Radial Connections

Summary. The record gives the rational estimates and geometric proof for ani's degree-seven polynomial: every connected set in its strict unit lemniscate joining two roots has Hausdorff measure greater than two. It develops contained paths for trinomials, collinear roots and two sparse families. Ordinary analytic arguments for critical-value criteria retain their unformalised inputs beside the statements. Critical-value moments, counterexamples to prescribed paths and questions about flow-strip geometry complete the account. The one-polynomial formal statement and correspondence with the historical wording remain distinct.

This paper covers the exact geometry of ani's one-polynomial counterexample, proved positive families and critical-value arguments with their unformalised inputs identified; formal-statement status and historical correspondence remain owned by the claims registry.

It does not establish the validity of claims tagged Lean, which belongs to the cited kernel-checked source, or the current status of Erdős #1041, including the later one-polynomial Formal Conjectures path-image Hausdorff-length check and its unreviewed historical curve-length correspondence; those distinctions belong to docs/claims.json in the mathematics repository.

In this paper

Sources and scope.

The two-sheeted component, its square-root uniformisation, the Bergman segment inequality, the component-capacity estimate, Pólya’s area–capacity inequality and the exhaustion are ordinary arguments. They are collected in the proof using an isolated critical value, whose capacity step is cited separately above.

The proof requires both a simple critical point and a disc centred on [0,1] that isolates its normalised value. For example, the trinomial zn−b with n>2 and 0<|b|<1 has a short path by Theorem 3.1, but its only critical point is not simple, so this method does not apply. The restriction is on the chosen critical point and on the distance of the other critical values from the chosen disc. The other critical points may be multiple, and their values need not be separated from one another. No sharpness is claimed for S=4/3, and no assertion is made that every polynomial has a suitable isolated simple value. In particular, this is not a proof of the unrestricted assertion of Erdős #1041.

A related area comparison is Dubinin’s Theorem 1. The source is [12], Theorem 1 on printed page 85 of the POMI original. It concerns a holomorphic function that gives a full n-fold covering of an annulus t1<|w|<t2, and, in the notation of that theorem, with E its explicitly defined complementary set, it states

(t2t1)2/n≤m(E∪D)m(E).

The full covering and the explicit complementary set are hypotheses of the theorem. Tao cited it on the Erdős Problem #1041 discussion page on 25 March 2026 for the relative scaling factor s2/n between the areas of two nested sublevel sets, which is the reading of the displayed inequality in which E and E∪D are those two sublevel sets and the covering hypothesis holds. No step of this note uses that relative inequality. The disk-family theorem instead uses Pólya’s absolute area–capacity inequality on a component containing fewer than n roots, after the component-capacity estimate supplies its strict capacity gap. The absolute sublevel inequality Area⁡{|P|<T}≤πT2/n remains the area input to Remark 4.1 and to Remark 5.1. Dubinin’s theorem is a neighbouring result under a full covering hypothesis and supplies no curve joining two roots.

About this paper

Authorship and AI use. Will Cook built and directed the research infrastructure and maintains the public release. He reviewed claims when he could. AI agents did most of the research and drafting. Cook did not independently verify every claim.

Cite and contact. Cite this paper by its title, author and date above, with its PDF; cite the earlier sources it uses for a mathematical result. For software, use the release citation and give the commit used. Contact Will with questions or corrections.

Prefer the manuscript?

Equations typeset from the exact TeX. Rendered from the LaTeX manuscript source with file fingerprint sha256:4bee9a881dbbe940. Its file fingerprint matched the published source record, so the PDF above, the LaTeX, and this page are one manuscript. Redeploying the site regenerates this page from whatever the public repository holds at that moment.