Plectis

Long paper

Paths in Polynomial Lemniscates: A Degree-Seven Counterexample and Radial Connections

Summary. The record gives the rational estimates and geometric proof for ani's degree-seven polynomial: every connected set in its strict unit lemniscate joining two roots has Hausdorff measure greater than two. It develops contained paths for trinomials, collinear roots and two sparse families. Ordinary analytic arguments for critical-value criteria retain their unformalised inputs beside the statements. Critical-value moments, counterexamples to prescribed paths and questions about flow-strip geometry complete the account. The one-polynomial formal statement and correspondence with the historical wording remain distinct.

This paper covers the exact geometry of ani's one-polynomial counterexample, proved positive families and critical-value arguments with their unformalised inputs identified; formal-statement status and historical correspondence remain owned by the claims registry.

It does not establish the validity of claims tagged Lean, which belongs to the cited kernel-checked source, or the current status of Erdős #1041, including the later one-polynomial Formal Conjectures path-image Hausdorff-length check and its unreviewed historical curve-length correspondence; those distinctions belong to docs/claims.json in the mathematics repository.

In this paper

Unformalised remark: a quartic composed with a power map

We next examine the ordinary lifting argument based on Pendyala’s degree-four theorem [11] and four-point radial lemma [11]. The cited quartic result alone does not formalise this higher-degree construction. Let P be a monic quartic, let q≥2 be an integer, and set

f(z)=P((z−h)q).

Assume that every root of f lies in the open unit disc. A repeated root of f gives the constant path, so suppose f is squarefree. Then the roots of P are distinct and nonzero. For a root w=yq of P, all points h+ζjy, with ζ=e2πi/q, are roots of f. Hence the open-disc hypothesis gives

1q∑j=0q−1|h+ζjy|2=|h|2+|y|2<1.

In particular |w|1/q=|y|<1, which is the bound needed for the lifted length, and also |w|<1. Pendyala’s chord-or-radial argument supplies the quotient geometry in two cases. If two quotient roots satisfy |wi−wj|<1, every point w of the chord [wi,wj] lies in the unit disc; the two endpoint factors of |P(w)| have product at most |wi−wj|2/4 and the other two factors are below 2, so |P(w)|≤|wi−wj|2<1. Otherwise the quotient roots are pairwise at distance at least 1. Choosing R with maxk|wk|<R<1 and applying the four-point radial lemma to the points wk/R gives distinct i,j with |P(twi)|≤R4 and |P(twj)|≤R4 for 0≤t≤1, so the radial segments [0,wi] and [0,wj] lie in {|P|<1}. The extra issue is metric: a short chord in the w-plane need not lift isometrically through y↦yq.

Put α=1/q. On a chord avoiding 0, choose a continuous argument and hence a root lift y with yq=w. Differentiation gives |dy|=α|w|α−1|dw|, independently of the chosen root. If the supporting line has distance d from 0, and x is distance along that line from the perpendicular foot, then

(d2+x2)α−1≤xα−1(x>0).

The negative exponent is why replacing |w| by x gives an upper length bound. Lean checks the integral of the power-map derivative

α∫0Axα−1dx=Aα.

If the foot lies on the chord, split there: the two integrals are bounded by the α-powers of the distances from the foot to the endpoints, hence by |a|α+|b|α. If the foot lies outside the chord, integrate on one side of it; extending the interval to the foot bounds the result by the α-power of the farther endpoint’s modulus. When the chord passes through 0, choose a continuous root on each half and join the lifts at 0; the integral is finite because α>0. This proves the chord-lift estimate

length⁡([a,b]~)≤|a|1/q+|b|1/q.

The strict endpoint-length estimate also proves that if 0≤a,b<1, α>0, and a candidate length L is at most aα+bα, then L<2. The close-pair chord therefore has a lift of length below 2. In the other case the quotient arms meet at 0, so their lifts are radial segments meeting at h, with total length |wi|1/q+|wj|1/q<2. In both cases f=P∘((z−h)q) transfers containment from the quotient curve. Distinct quotient endpoints give distinct roots of f. This proves the path assertion in every degree 4q≥8. The fibre average gives a little more: |h|<1 and |wk|1/q<1−|h|2 for every quotient root. Consequently the same constructed path has length

length<21−|h|2≤2.

This refinement concerns the translated power-substitution family, not arbitrary degree-4q polynomials.

Pendyala proves the quartic geometric theorem and its four-point radial lemma. The local Lean module checks the antitone density inequality, its integral, the strict powered endpoint-length bound, and the final length estimate. It does not formalize Pendyala’s geometric lemma, the continuous covering-space construction of the root lift, or the ordinary chord/radial case assembly. This is a family defined by a power substitution, not a proof of unrestricted Erdős #1041.

The joining point in the quartic construction.

Pendyala’s proof of [11] uses a smallest enclosing disc and joins the selected roots through its centre. For the power substitution we instead apply [11] to the centred disc |w|≤R. That lemma requires only the disc and pairwise-distance hypotheses, not minimality of the disc. Keeping the joining point at 0 is what makes the radial lift above valid. The endpoint-length bound for a single chord would not justify lifting an arbitrary broken line through a nonzero quotient vertex.

About this paper

Authorship and AI use. Will Cook built and directed the research infrastructure and maintains the public release. He reviewed claims when he could. AI agents did most of the research and drafting. Cook did not independently verify every claim.

Cite and contact. Cite this paper by its title, author and date above, with its PDF; cite the earlier sources it uses for a mathematical result. For software, use the release citation and give the commit used. Contact Will with questions or corrections.

Prefer the manuscript?

Equations typeset from the exact TeX. Rendered from the LaTeX manuscript source with file fingerprint sha256:4bee9a881dbbe940. Its file fingerprint matched the published source record, so the PDF above, the LaTeX, and this page are one manuscript. Redeploying the site regenerates this page from whatever the public repository holds at that moment.