Plectis

Long paper

Paths in Polynomial Lemniscates: A Degree-Seven Counterexample and Radial Connections

Summary. The record gives the rational estimates and geometric proof for ani's degree-seven polynomial: every connected set in its strict unit lemniscate joining two roots has Hausdorff measure greater than two. It develops contained paths for trinomials, collinear roots and two sparse families. Ordinary analytic arguments for critical-value criteria retain their unformalised inputs beside the statements. Critical-value moments, counterexamples to prescribed paths and questions about flow-strip geometry complete the account. The one-polynomial formal statement and correspondence with the historical wording remain distinct.

This paper covers the exact geometry of ani's one-polynomial counterexample, proved positive families and critical-value arguments with their unformalised inputs identified; formal-statement status and historical correspondence remain owned by the claims registry.

It does not establish the validity of claims tagged Lean, which belongs to the cited kernel-checked source, or the current status of Erdős #1041, including the later one-polynomial Formal Conjectures path-image Hausdorff-length check and its unreviewed historical curve-length correspondence; those distinctions belong to docs/claims.json in the mathematics repository.

In this paper

Further questions about topology, length and perturbation

The degree-seven example refutes the unrestricted formulation. The questions below concern the topology and quantitative estimates needed on restricted classes. They preserve the distinction between a valid inverse-sheet decomposition, bounds for its pieces, and a bound for a contained curve assembled from those pieces.

1. Local saddle geometry and the refuted tree estimate

Problem 15.1 (corrected local saddle assembly). The printed 1/(2π) spanning-tree estimate of Proposition 12 is false: the Cassini polynomial z2−a2 at a=9/10 makes the proposed upper bound strictly smaller than the distance between its roots. Any later argument must include the positive length needed to join the pieces, select only one short pair instead of spanning every root, or use a different global metric inequality. A four-pronged or cut-annulus local model may still be useful for another estimate, but it cannot recover (5.1).

The full-disc model x2−y2, an annulus in which lower branches rejoin, two saddles joined by a separatrix and simultaneous saddle levels are mandatory tests. Repeating the one-lower/two-upper assertion does not answer the problem.

2. Cutting a compact region into flow strips

Let p be a polynomial with simple roots and simple critical points, and set u=−log⁡|p| away from the roots. Simplicity of the roots makes every critical value nonzero; critical points themselves may lie at 0. For regular values c<T, let V be a component of {u>c} and assume that V∩{c<u<T}― is a compact genus-zero surface, its lower boundary is one smooth Jordan curve, its upper boundary consists of m smooth level curves each enclosing one root, all interior critical points are nondegenerate index-one saddles, the normalised gradient field, defined away from the saddles,

X=∇u|∇u|2=−pp′,

is transverse to the level boundaries, and no maximal X-trajectory has two saddle endpoints. The equality uses the identification of a planar vector with a complex number: ∇u=−p′/p―. In particular, du(X)=1 wherever X is defined.

Problem 15.2 (finite strip decomposition after ray cuts). For every η>0, construct disjoint Morse neighbourhoods Nj with ∑jdiam⁡Nj<η and a finite set of complete separatrix or regular-flow cuts so that the closure of each remaining component in the cut-open surface is flow-diffeomorphic to a rectangle

[aS,bS]×[0,1],u=t,

with connected level sections and no uncut annular component. Give an explicit finite bound for the number of strips in terms of the number s of saddles and the number m of upper boundary curves, or exhibit the minimal missing hypothesis or a counterexample.

No particular formula such as 2s+1 is presumed. Boundary tangencies, simultaneous levels and branch reunion through an annulus require explicit cuts. The closure is taken in the cut-open surface, with its separate boundary copies, not after regluing them in the plane. The quadratic example following Problem 15.5 explains why replacing this construction by the ordinary orbit quotient would fail.

3. Length estimates for joining flow strips

For a strip S, write

ΓtS=S∩{u=t},PS(t)=H1(ΓtS),

and write

ΦS(t)=∫ΓtS|∇u|ds

for its transverse flux. On a regular sub-band, u is harmonic and the side boundaries are flow lines. The divergence theorem therefore makes ΦS(t) independent of t. Normalise the transverse measure by

dμt0(x)=|∇u(x)|ΦS(t0)ds(x).

The choice of measure is determined by the length calculation. Since u=t along the normalised flow, its Euclidean speed is 1/|∇u|. Transporting the flux measure to level t therefore gives

∫Γt0Slen⁡(γx)dμt0(x)=∫aSbS∫ΓtS1|∇u||∇u|ΦS(t0)dsdt=1ΦS(t0)∫aSbSPS(t)dt.

Here 0<ΦS(t0)<∞ for a nonempty regular strip. Tonelli’s theorem applies to the nonnegative integrand. At a critical endpoint level, exhaustion through regular sub-bands gives the same identity, allowing the common value to be infinite. A finite right side gives a trajectory of length at most that mean; an identity with both sides infinite gives no length estimate. A strip flux need not be an integer multiple of 2π. For f(z)=z and u=−log⁡|z|, take an annular sector of angular width θ. On a circular level arc, |∇u|=1/r and ds=rdϕ, so its flux is ΦS=θ. For f(z)=zn, the same calculation gives ΦS=nθ. A closed regular level curve enclosing k roots has flux 2πk by the argument principle. Restricting it to a strip replaces that full winding by the strip’s share of the flux. The averaging measure therefore depends on the width of the strip. Summing separate strip estimates cannot replace those widths by the winding number of a closed level curve. They do not reopen (5.1). Cassini already excludes the printed coefficient 1/(2π) for any embedded tree that contains all m roots: Problem 15.1 records that no later gluing argument can retain that estimate.

Problem 15.3 (strip gluing after the printed coefficient). Assuming Problem 15.2, do one of the following, for every η>0.

  1. Produce an embedded tree G containing all m roots whose length obeys

    (6.1)len⁡(G)≤C∫2α∞PV(t)dt+η

    for an explicit constant C>1/(2π), uniform over a stated class of polynomials and an explicitly restricted range of truncations α. The restrictions must account for attachment cost and for a valid allocation of the strip fluxes ΦS.

  2. Connect only one pair of distinct roots, rather than spanning every root.

  3. Give a different global metric inequality that is not (5.1).

The printed coefficient 1/(2π) is not an open target. Better additive control of saddle, annular-cut and root-cap cost cannot recover (5.1).

The restriction on α is essential in the first alternative. For a fixed f(z)=z2−a2, with 0<a<1, choose 0<c<−2log⁡a and let V be the component of {−log⁡|f|>c} containing both roots. At sufficiently deep levels, the Cassini parametrisation used above gives

PV(t)≤2πe−ta2−e−t.

Consequently ∫2α∞PV(t)dt→0 as α→∞, whereas every spanning tree has length at least 2a. No fixed C can cover arbitrary truncations. This is a limitation of the unrestricted formulation of (6.1), separate from the earlier counterexample to the particular coefficient 1/(2π).

The error term assigned to the collar in the printed argument

q=12π∫α2αPV(t)dt>0

uses the same excluded coefficient. It cannot be treated as an unused error allowance in an otherwise complete spanning-tree estimate. Shortest trajectories chosen independently in different strips may have endpoints that do not meet; the lengths needed to join them must also be bounded. Even such a bound would not restore the printed 1/(2π) tree estimate.

4. Coefficient perturbation and stability

Once a finite critical-value family is injective, Lean proves that an arbitrarily small translation makes every value nonzero and pairwise positive-ray separated. Lean also proves the explicit root-retention estimate: for a monic polynomial f of degree n≥1, a constant shift of modulus below ε>0 keeps all roots in the unit disc provided

((n+1)ε)1/n+maxf(b)=0|b|<1.

Adding a constant leaves the difference of two critical values unchanged, so it cannot separate values that were equal to begin with.

For a constant shift alone, factorisation gives the sharper elementary bound

(f+β)(z)=0⟹∏f(b)=0|z−b|=|β|⟹minf(b)=0|z−b|≤|β|1/n,

where the product counts roots with multiplicity. Hence maxf(b)=0|b|+|β|1/n<1 already ensures retention in the open unit disc. The factor n+1 in the Lean estimate is not needed for this ordinary constant-shift argument. The coefficient one in the displacement bound is optimal, as f(z)=zn shows. The estimate does not match labelled root lists or bound the cost of transporting an existing curve.

Qualitatively, a small linear perturbation also supplies distinct critical values as well as simple critical points. For deg⁡f≥2, a multiple critical point of f+λz must satisfy f″(c)=0 and λ=−f′(c); only finitely many parameters are excluded. Near any other parameter, label the distinct critical points by holomorphic functions cj(λ). Their values

vj(λ)=f(cj(λ))+λcj(λ)satisfyvj′(λ)=cj(λ).

Thus vi−vj cannot vanish identically for i≠j, and its zeros are isolated. Avoiding the finitely many pairs in a sufficiently small parameter neighbourhood gives simple critical points with distinct values. The neighbourhood can be chosen inside any prescribed disc about λ=0, proving the required arbitrarily small choice.

If distinct moduli are also needed for the excellent Morse function, the translation β can avoid them at the same time as the ray collisions. For each distinct pair vi,vj, the equality |vi+β|=|vj+β| is the real affine line

2ℜ((vi−vj)β―)=|vj|2−|vi|2.

For ray separation it is enough to avoid, for each pair, the real line through −vi and −vj: the ray-collision formula puts every forbidden translation on that line. Avoid also the finitely many points −vj to keep the translated values nonzero. Thus the full excluded set is contained in two real affine lines per pair of critical values, together with finitely many points. Its complement meets every open disc, so imposing distinct moduli costs no lower bound on the size of the perturbation. Root retention is also qualitative: choose a circle |z|=R<1 enclosing the original open-disc roots. If |λ|R+|β|<min|z|=R|f(z)|, Rouché’s theorem keeps all roots of f+λz+β inside that circle. These ordinary arguments establish genericity and root retention; they do not estimate the collar or the cost of transferring a selected curve. The first two requirements below therefore have qualitative proofs, while their simultaneous quantitative use is the remaining task.

For the next problem, fix a specified valid replacement for the refuted metric inequality. Its slack is the difference between the permitted length and the bound supplied by that replacement. The symbols q and qg refer to this same specified quantity for f and g, respectively; they are not the historical collar integral with coefficient 1/(2π). Without a choice of replacement inequality, the requirement qg>q/2 has no defined geometric content.

Problem 15.4 (two-stage generic perturbation with slack). For fixed root discs, compact collar K, regular levels α/2,α,2α,5α/2, and a specified valid replacement metric inequality with slack q>0 at f, prove that an arbitrarily small

gλ,β(z)=f(z)+λz+β

can be chosen so that:

  1. f+λz has simple relevant critical points and injective complex critical values;

  2. the checked constant translation β makes those values nonzero and pairwise ray-separated;

  3. no critical point enters the protected collar or truncation boundary;

  4. the relevant component remains in K, contains exactly the corresponding perturbed roots and has slack qg>q/2; and

  5. root displacement and straight-line transfer back to the original roots consume less than a prescribed fraction of q/m.

If the one-coefficient perturbation λz cannot ensure all five properties, give the smallest additional lower-coefficient direction that can, or an explicit obstruction.

The cited declarations supply finite planar avoidance and the constant translation. The ordinary argument above additionally supplies a linear perturbation with simple critical points and distinct critical values. What remains for the stated problem is simultaneous control of the protected collar, the component, the quantitative slack and the root-to-root transfer cost. No formalisation of the new genericity argument or solution of those stability requirements is claimed.

5. Newton flow on a compact region between regular levels

Classical Newton-flow theory describes maximal trajectories and the graph they form. Away from the roots and critical points, every orbit satisfies

p(z(t))=e−(t−t0)p(z(t0)),u(z(t))=u(z(t0))+t−t0,u=−log⁡|p|,

by the lemma of Shub, Tischler and Williams [7]. For an initial point that is neither a root nor a critical point, the maximal Newton trajectory has one of four endpoint patterns: each finite-time end is a critical point, an infinite forward end is a root, and an infinite backward end is the point at infinity [7]. Stationary trajectories at simple roots are not part of this classification. The maximal nonconstant trajectories with endpoints among the roots and critical points form a connected Newtonian graph with finitely many edges [7]. Critical-to-critical edges are included; pairwise distinct arguments exclude them by the value equation, not by the definition of the graph.

The smooth field needed for Morse theory is not −p/p′, which is undefined at a critical point with nonzero value. On the root-free band the Euclidean gradient satisfies

∇u=−p′/p―=|p′|2|p|2(−pp′)(p′≠0).

It has the same oriented nonstationary trajectories as the Newton field, with a different time parameter. At a simple critical point c, its derivative is the real Hessian of u, whose eigenvalues are ±|p″(c)/p(c)|. Thus it extends as a hyperbolic saddle there. A finite critical endpoint in Newton time is not a finite arrival at an equilibrium of the smooth field. These two parametrisations must be distinguished in a statement about a Morse–Smale flow.

Problem 15.5 (relative global Newton-flow theorem). Let p be a nonconstant polynomial, let a<b be finite regular values of u=−log⁡|p|, and suppose every critical point in the compact band

{z:a≤u(z)≤b}

is simple, with the critical values in the band on pairwise distinct positive rays. Describe the maximal trajectories of the smooth gradient field ∇u relative to the lower and upper level boundaries, each of which may have several components. Construct a cut-open model by regular flow strips, specifying the separate copies of cut boundaries and the equivalence relation used for its trajectory parameter space. Prove that this parameter space is Hausdorff, or identify the obstruction to the proposed identifications. The ordinary orbit quotient of the uncut band is not required to be Hausdorff. State the boundary convention and the comparison with Newton trajectories through the positive change of time above, without evaluating −p/p′ at its singular points.

The endpoint classification on this band follows from the cited Newton classification and the time change. Each nonconstant trajectory runs from the lower boundary to the upper boundary, from the lower boundary to a saddle, or from a saddle to the upper boundary. Indeed, Newton time equals the change in u, so the part of a Newton trajectory in the band has bounded Newton-time interval. At either end it must meet a regular boundary or tend to a critical point. Ray separation excludes two different critical endpoints, and strict increase of u excludes two ends at the same critical point. In smooth-gradient time, regular boundary crossings occur in finite time, whereas convergence to a saddle takes infinite time by uniqueness for the smooth differential equation. The remaining trajectories are the stationary saddles. This is an ordinary consequence of the classical classification, not an additional checked Lean theorem.

The planar transversality condition also follows from the hypotheses. Along a nonstationary gradient trajectory, the value of p has constant argument, so a trajectory between two different saddles would contradict ray separation. A homoclinic trajectory is excluded by the strict increase of u. The stable-manifold theorem gives local stable and unstable curves tangent to the Hessian eigenspaces. Their global branches for different saddles therefore do not meet; at one saddle they meet transversely, since their tangent lines are the two distinct Hessian eigenspaces. The regular lower boundary is an entrance and the regular upper boundary an exit. With this boundary convention, the gradient satisfies the Morse–Smale transversality condition. This does not make the quotient by entire trajectories Hausdorff.

For an explicit obstruction, take p(z)=z2−1/4 and the compact band

log⁡2≤−log⁡|p(z)|≤log⁡8.

Its only critical point is the simple saddle at 0, whose value is −1/4; both boundary levels are regular and ray separation is vacuous. The positive real separatrix, including its upper-boundary endpoint, is

(0,1/(22)],dxdτ=2x1/4−x2.

Integration gives τ−τ0=18log⁡(x/x0)−(x2−x02)/4, so this trajectory tends to 0 as smooth-gradient time τ→−∞. Thus this orbit is not closed in the band: its closure also contains the stationary orbit {0}. In the quotient topology its image is a nonclosed singleton, so the orbit quotient is not even T1, hence not Hausdorff. Reparametrising the nonstationary trajectories leaves this quotient unchanged.

On an actual cut-open flow rectangle, by contrast, collapsing the trajectories gives the transverse interval. Identifying boundary copies is a further quotient and requires a separate separation argument. The Reeb graph uses yet another equivalence relation: it identifies connected components of level sets, not complete trajectories. Neither that graph nor the embedded Newtonian graph can be substituted for the orbit quotient without specifying a new equivalence relation.

Global solution theory and the finite graph are the classical results cited above. The relative endpoint classification and transversality are proved above. They do not construct the required finite cut-open space, justify its boundary identifications or control the length needed to join the pieces. The quadratic example settles the uncut-orbit-space question negatively; it does not obstruct a construction that retains the required separate boundary copies.

The unrestricted assertion in Erdős #1041 is false by Theorem 1.2. The positive results do not give a classification of the polynomials that admit a short connection. Their hypotheses and containment levels differ: low critical value, separated simple critical value, and the individually proved polynomial families treat separate sufficient conditions. In particular, the scaled (5/2)μ1/n bound is at level (25/13)μ, which is smaller than 2μ; it therefore improves both the constant and the level of the 71/10 construction. The latter is retained for its independent proof and component-sensitive estimates. The critical-value moment does not choose a contained pair. The ordinary generic slit-sheet topology has classical antecedents; the earlier proposed sufficient estimate concerned the lengths of particular inverse-ray curves. Their minimum need not equal the infimum over all contained curves. The degree-seven counterexample above rules out the corresponding universal estimate for these particular curves too, without invalidating conditional estimates on smaller classes.

Adjacent inverse-map methods.

Crane [22] uses inverse-branch hyperbolic geometry, Dubinin’s radial-slit input and capacity for a derivative-normalised Smale ratio. Dubinin’s four-point result [23] assumes bounded critical values and estimates distortion. These are relevant methods, not direct sources of the present positive moment or connector constant, and their normalisations are not interchangeable with a root-disc hypothesis.

About this paper

Authorship and AI use. Will Cook built and directed the research infrastructure and maintains the public release. He reviewed claims when he could. AI agents did most of the research and drafting. Cook did not independently verify every claim.

Cite and contact. Cite this paper by its title, author and date above, with its PDF; cite the earlier sources it uses for a mathematical result. For software, use the release citation and give the commit used. Contact Will with questions or corrections.

Prefer the manuscript?

Equations typeset from the exact TeX. Rendered from the LaTeX manuscript source with file fingerprint sha256:4bee9a881dbbe940. Its file fingerprint matched the published source record, so the PDF above, the LaTeX, and this page are one manuscript. Redeploying the site regenerates this page from whatever the public repository holds at that moment.