Long paper
Paths in Polynomial Lemniscates: A Degree-Seven Counterexample and Radial Connections
Summary. The record gives the rational estimates and geometric proof for ani's degree-seven polynomial: every connected set in its strict unit lemniscate joining two roots has Hausdorff measure greater than two. It develops contained paths for trinomials, collinear roots and two sparse families. Ordinary analytic arguments for critical-value criteria retain their unformalised inputs beside the statements. Critical-value moments, counterexamples to prescribed paths and questions about flow-strip geometry complete the account. The one-polynomial formal statement and correspondence with the historical wording remain distinct.
Start here, by the editorial route
In this paper
Degree three
For a cubic we can estimate the inverse roots directly after
normalising at a critical point of least value modulus. The root-disc
hypothesis makes that modulus less than one, and two radial segments in
the normalised coordinates give a path shorter than
Theorem 6.1 (the cubic case). Let
Proof. Multiple roots give a constant path, so assume
Suppose first that
At the other
critical point
Under that hypothesis
Since
If
If instead
The unit level need not be regular, even when all roots lie in the
open unit disc. For example,
Sources and scope.
Pendyala [11] proves the separate quartic case; no historical priority for the cubic theorem is asserted here.
About this paper
Authorship and AI use. Will Cook built and directed the research infrastructure and maintains the public release. He reviewed claims when he could. AI agents did most of the research and drafting. Cook did not independently verify every claim.
Cite and contact. Cite this paper by its title, author and date above, with its PDF; cite the earlier sources it uses for a mathematical result. For software, use the release citation and give the commit used. Contact Will with questions or corrections.
Prefer the manuscript?
Equations typeset from the exact TeX. Rendered from the LaTeX manuscript source with file fingerprint sha256:4bee9a881dbbe940. Its file fingerprint matched the published source record, so the PDF above, the LaTeX, and this page are one manuscript. Redeploying the site regenerates this page from whatever the public repository holds at that moment.