Long paper
Reciprocal Mersenne Subseries
Summary. A weighted summability criterion proves irrationality of reciprocal Mersenne subseries: if h is the part of a supported on a finite nonempty prime set P, every infinite A with ∑
Start here, by the editorial route
In this paper
Two proof details and sources
The comparison of displacement atoms works for real bases:
For the scalar positive-cover cost, put
These two calculations supply the elementary details used in the short paper.
The original periodic and linear-independence papers of Luca and Tachiya are now distinguished from their later overview [14][15][3]. Their theorem formulations used here were read in the author-written overview; the two original publisher PDFs were not retrieved. Van Assche’s nonvanishing and small-linear-form argument for the full Lambert series [16] is a comparator for the missing upper-height control, not a result for arbitrary thinnings.
For achievement-set background, Hornich’s original bibliographic record [17] is separated from the exposition actually used here [4]. Głąb and Prus-Wiśniowski’s survey [18] provides a modern map of geometry and cardinality questions, not a rational-membership theorem for the present set.
Library declarations.
The following fixed-revision links locate the supplementary formal
statements used in this note and its companion. Pairwise-coprime
supports: factorial-support
instance; powers-of-two-support
instance; pairwise-coprime
theorem. Eventually periodic weights: irrationality
for the stated eventually periodic weights. Fixed-core supports: carry
certificates for the stated fixed-core support; irrationality
for the stated fixed-core support. Finite supports and denominators:
noncollapse
for the reduced rational denominator. Rational values and carries:
rational
support values and Möbius-inverted carries; rationality
and integer recurrences with vanishing scaled error; a
lower bound for reciprocal mass; unboundedness
of the shifted odd-tail recurrence; lengths
of intervals with zero divisor count. Composite dilation: the
divisor-count identity under dilation; the
upper bound for the dilation correction; the
example with exponents two and six. The achievement set: Lebesgue
measure one; perfect;
totally
disconnected; nowhere
dense; membership
and greedy tail bounds; non-membership
of
About this paper
Authorship and AI use. Will Cook built and directed the research infrastructure and maintains the public release. He reviewed claims when he could. AI agents did most of the research and drafting. Cook did not independently verify every claim.
Cite and contact. Cite this paper by its title, author and date above, with its PDF; cite the earlier sources it uses for a mathematical result. For software, use the release citation and give the commit used. Contact Will with questions or corrections.
Prefer the manuscript?
Equations typeset from the exact TeX. Rendered from the LaTeX manuscript source with file fingerprint sha256:47cf6a152738f17c. Its file fingerprint matched the published source record, so the PDF above, the LaTeX, and this page are one manuscript. Redeploying the site regenerates this page from whatever the public repository holds at that moment.