Plectis

Long paper

Reciprocal Mersenne Subseries

Summary. A weighted summability criterion proves irrationality of reciprocal Mersenne subseries: if h is the part of a supported on a finite nonempty prime set P, every infinite A with ∑ h(a)/(a(bh(a)−1)) finite has irrational ∑ (ba−1)−1. The base-two condition gives the conclusion at every integer base for every infinite subset, and permits an example with divergent reciprocal sum, while excluding full support and all odd exponents. The proof averages over a finite part of the support and over dyadic observation lengths. Erdős's weaker reciprocal-summable theorem is proved in full, and a common window extends both arguments to unions of weighted and positive-cover supports. Finite-denominator and achievement-set calculations formulate tests for the targets 1/2 and 1/21; those tests do not decide either target or the universal question. Prime support at base 2 and squarefree support at power-of-two bases are attributed as existing work.

This paper covers a claim-bounded problem-specific reasoning surface for Erdős #257: selected checked premises, finite computations, closed routes, surviving obligations, and their exact evidence bands.

It does not establish the validity of claims tagged Lean, which belongs to the cited kernel-checked source, or a solution to Erdős #257, whose universal and half-value questions remain open.

In this paper
The final-skip band formula, and what it does not show

Definition 10.15 (Upper-reset dyadic band escape). At each upper-reset row d≥13, write Ed=4overshoot(d)+abovePulse(d) for the reset expression in the preceding transition formulas. The condition is

for every 0≤j≤d,Ed>2d−j+1orEd+2(d+j)≤2d−j+1.

Thus Ed must avoid the interval (2d−j+1−2(d+j),2d−j+1] at every indicated scale. Erdos249257.SeamUpperResetDyadicBandEscape. In words: at every upper-reset row d≥13, the reset charge must avoid a linear-width forbidden band immediately below every dyadic threshold 2d−j+1, for every j≤d simultaneously. Granted this hypothesis, Erdos249257.half_mem_mersenneAchievementSet_of_upperResetDyadicBandEscape gives 1/2∈A outright.

Proposition 10.16 (Quantifier collapse: one critical index suffices, not d+1). Let d,E∈N and assume E≤2d+1. Then the purely combinatorial statement DyadicBandEscape(d,E)⟺∃j, CriticalDyadicBandIndex(d,E,j)∧E+2(d+j)≤2d−j+1 collapses the ∀j∈[0,d] band-avoidance condition (formally d+1 separate inequalities) to checking exactly one nearest-boundary index j. The range assumption ensures that a dyadic threshold lies at or above E. Choose the smallest such threshold: smaller thresholds are already below E, while larger thresholds have narrower forbidden bands. Without the range assumption all bands escape automatically when E>2d+1, but no critical index exists; (d,E)=(0,3) is the smallest example. Specialised to the concrete seam reset charge, SeamUpperResetCriticalBandEscape is proved logically equivalent to Definition 10.15’s hypothesis. Zero Mersenne/seam content in the core lemma ; pure (d,E,j) arithmetic over powers of 2.

Observation 10.17 (A verified finite range of reset indices). The linked certificate proves the condition in Definition 10.15 for each reset index 13≤d≤30. It uses successor remainders at rows 14–31, including rem(14)=392 and rem(31)=4,187,487,147. Thus the last remainder row is 31, but the last reset index covered by this theorem is 30. Erdos249257.seamUpperResetDyadicBandEscape_through_thirty.

Remark 10.18 (What this does not show). Definition 10.15 is a ∀d≥13 statement; Observation 10.17 is a finite verification in the cited Lean source for 13≤d≤30. The finite certificate does not establish the universal hypothesis. Nothing here proves the band condition for all d≥13; it is the unproved hypothesis of Theorem 6.10, stated here in its own form.

The finite theorem supplies no reset index beyond 30. It therefore does not prove that the orbit avoids the band at unboundedly many reset indices, let alone at every reset. The universal band condition remains an unproved sufficient hypothesis.

For the branch convention of Theorem 5.16, direct integer recomputation at reset-test indices 6≤r≤2500 gives 605 middle and 604 upper resets, hence 1209 resets. There are 1286 right transitions. The earlier reported count 1264 does not agree with this convention. The recomputation checks the sign inequalities at these resets, the square-root bound at resets r≥10, and the displayed band condition at upper resets r≥13, with no failures. This remains a finite ordinary computation, distinct from the cited Lean theorem for 13≤r≤30 and from an assertion at every later reset.

About this paper

Authorship and AI use. Will Cook built and directed the research infrastructure and maintains the public release. He reviewed claims when he could. AI agents did most of the research and drafting. Cook did not independently verify every claim.

Cite and contact. Cite this paper by its title, author and date above, with its PDF; cite the earlier sources it uses for a mathematical result. For software, use the release citation and give the commit used. Contact Will with questions or corrections.

Prefer the manuscript?

Equations typeset from the exact TeX. Rendered from the LaTeX manuscript source with file fingerprint sha256:47cf6a152738f17c. Its file fingerprint matched the published source record, so the PDF above, the LaTeX, and this page are one manuscript. Redeploying the site regenerates this page from whatever the public repository holds at that moment.