Erdős #1049: one numerical certificate, exactly scoped
The question
For which rational bases is the relevant Lambert-type series
irrational? The base
What is checked here
Lean proves the concrete inequality
log(2) / log(7) < 1/2 - 1/pi^2.
Comparator is configured to check a tiny proof transport from the public source theorem to a separately declared Mathlib-only statement, with a deliberately weakened nearby statement as the negative fixture. The checked-in configuration and workflow are release gates, not terminal replay receipts.
This is useful because the inequality is the numerical input used at
the base
What is not checked here
Lean does not formalise the full Bundschuh-Väänänen theorem, all of
its hypotheses, or its irrationality conclusion. This packet does not
advance the open base
Who did what
AI agents helped draft the Lean proof, the statement firewall, and this exposition. Will Cook directed and reviewed the public release and remains responsible for its claims. The Lean kernel checks the source proposition. Comparator is configured to check the transport to the separately declared statement. A commit-bound terminal replay artifact is required before claiming that a particular generation passed. The Bundschuh-Väänänen theorem remains a cited external result.
Proof handle
- Public
Lean source: theorem
sevenHalves_bundschuhVaananen_margin - Separately
declared challenge statement: theorem
comparator_sevenHalves_numericalHeight - Source transport
- Deliberate mismatch
- Machine-readable scope
Until a commit-bound terminal replay artifact is attached, the precise badge is: Comparator-configured numerical certificate. It is not an independently verified irrationality theorem.