Long paper
Running least common multiples: distinct values and multiplicities
Summary. For the prime set {2,3,5}, a five-map argument proves irrationality of the sum over distinct running LCMs. Two-prime sums reduce to a transcendental Hecke–Mahler value. For the repeated three-prime sum, an equivalent residue criterion leaves an arithmetic condition open. Complete ordinary arguments for general distinct-running-LCM sums and prime-power subseries are retained as remarks awaiting formalisation.
Start here, by the editorial route
In this paper
Words and tails.
For an infinite word
The final
term in
We apply this identity to
Remark 5.2 (integral tails). If
Proof. Each
◻
Two words with a long common prefix have close values. When the words differ only by rearrangements, equality of their values imposes a stronger condition on every rearranged block.
Remark 5.3 (rearranged blocks). Let
If
, then for every .If
for every , then .
Proof. Let
If
which proves (ii). ◻
Remark 5.4 (short rearrangements). The map
Proof. For two letters,
There is a collision on four letters:
About this paper
Authorship and AI use. Will Cook built and directed the research infrastructure and maintains the public release. He reviewed claims when he could. AI agents did most of the research and drafting. Cook did not independently verify every claim.
Cite and contact. Cite this paper by its title, author and date above, with its PDF; cite the earlier sources it uses for a mathematical result. For software, use the release citation and give the commit used. Contact Will with questions or corrections.
Prefer the manuscript?
Equations typeset from the exact TeX. Rendered from the LaTeX manuscript source with file fingerprint sha256:27b68b4b0cf24ce2. Its file fingerprint matched the published source record, so the PDF above, the LaTeX, and this page are one manuscript. Redeploying the site regenerates this page from whatever the public repository holds at that moment.