Plectis

Long paper

Geometric Moments and Rational Lambert Values: Proofs and Further Results

Summary. The record proves the fixed-base Hankel asymptotic for Zudilin's normalised moments and the rational-base irrationality criterion log b/log a<0.4056830213840605…. The determinant proof separates geometric node configurations from positive weights; the irrationality proof instead specialises Zudilin's 2004 polynomial forms after cancellation. Coefficient moments, evaluated lattices and congruence conditions distinguish integer divisibility from nonzero remainder decay. A broader ratio-limit argument and a rational-value model remain unformalised. None of these arguments settles F(3/2).

This paper covers the sharp fixed-base Hankel asymptotic and rational-base irrationality proofs, coefficient moments and arithmetic obstructions, with ordinary ratio-limit and rational-value models distinguished from checked results.

It does not establish the validity of claims tagged Lean, which belongs to the cited kernel-checked source, or a solution to Erdős #1049, which remains open.

In this paper
The lattice after evaluation.

For example, (1,0),(1,6) generate Z⊕6Z. They give two residues modulo 2. Within that lattice, the vectors whose two coordinates are even form 2Z⊕6Z; dividing them by 2 gives Z⊕3Z, of index 3. These are two different counts: the number of attainable residues before division, and the index of the lattice left after division. Smith normal form computes both for any rank-two lattice. The first count describes congruences available before division; the second describes the integrality restriction that survives it. Neither count estimates the real remainders of the rows.

Let primitive integer rows uj∈Z2 span a rank-two lattice L, and let g be the gcd of their 2×2 minors. Since at least one row is primitive, the Smith invariants are 1,g [34]. Hence, for D≥1,

|im⁡(L⟶(Z/DZ)2)|=D2gcd(g,D),[Z2:(L∩DZ2)/D]=ggcd(g,D).

Indeed an integral unimodular change of coordinates takes L to Z×gZ; reduction modulo D and intersection with DZ2 give the two formulas. This is Smith normal form over Z, not over Z[p]. It measures the actual image, rather than the ambient residue space. If two independent divided rows have coordinate height at most H and remainders of absolute value at most ε, their nonzero integer determinant gives the necessary inequality 2Hε≥g/gcd(g,D). That is not a necessary condition for producing a single nonzero form. If the specialised rows are not primitive, let d1∣d2 be the positive Smith invariants instead. For D≥1 the corresponding formulas are

|im⁡(LmodD)|=D2gcd(d1,D)gcd(d2,D),[Z2:(L∩DZ2)/D]=d1d2gcd(d1,D)gcd(d2,D).

They follow by applying the one-dimensional calculation to each summand diZ. Polynomial coefficient content alone does not determine either integer Smith invariant after specialisation.

About this paper

Authorship and AI use. Will Cook built and directed the research infrastructure and maintains the public release. He reviewed claims when he could. AI agents did most of the research and drafting. Cook did not independently verify every claim.

Cite and contact. Cite this paper by its title, author and date above, with its PDF; cite the earlier sources it uses for a mathematical result. For software, use the release citation and give the commit used. Contact Will with questions or corrections.

Prefer the manuscript?

Equations typeset from the exact TeX. Rendered from the LaTeX manuscript source with file fingerprint sha256:1f04580702ed8f8c. Its file fingerprint matched the published source record, so the PDF above, the LaTeX, and this page are one manuscript. Redeploying the site regenerates this page from whatever the public repository holds at that moment.