Plectis

Long paper

Geometric Moments and Rational Lambert Values: Proofs and Further Results

Summary. The record proves the fixed-base Hankel asymptotic for Zudilin's normalised moments and the rational-base irrationality criterion log b/log a<0.4056830213840605…. The determinant proof separates geometric node configurations from positive weights; the irrationality proof instead specialises Zudilin's 2004 polynomial forms after cancellation. Coefficient moments, evaluated lattices and congruence conditions distinguish integer divisibility from nonzero remainder decay. A broader ratio-limit argument and a rational-value model remain unformalised. None of these arguments settles F(3/2).

This paper covers the sharp fixed-base Hankel asymptotic and rational-base irrationality proofs, coefficient moments and arithmetic obstructions, with ordinary ratio-limit and rational-value models distinguished from checked results.

It does not establish the validity of claims tagged Lean, which belongs to the cited kernel-checked source, or a solution to Erdős #1049, which remains open.

In this paper

Introduction

For t>1, the Lambert series

F(t)=∑n≥11tn−1=∑n≥1τ(n)tn

has two useful descriptions: as a sum of simple fractions and as a divisor generating series. Here τ(n) counts the positive divisors of n. The equality follows by expanding each fraction, since all terms are nonnegative; the bound τ(n)≤n ensures convergence. Chowla conjectured that F(t) is irrational for every rational t>1, as recorded by Erdős [2] and in Bloom’s catalogue [26]. Erdős proved the integer case in 1948 [1].

Two constructions of Zudilin enter, for different reasons. The 2016 approximation [9] supplies positive moments, whose Hankel determinants we evaluate asymptotically. The 2004 forms [8] supply polynomial coefficients whose cancellation and rational evaluation give an irrationality region. A denominator estimate for the second construction is not an estimate for the first; each coefficient family needs its own arithmetic analysis. The shorter paper, Hankel Determinants of Geometric Moments and Rational Lambert Values, begins with the determinant result. Here the polynomial forms come first, making their exact arithmetic available for the later comparisons. Readers following only the determinant argument may start with Section 3: its moment calculation does not use the rational-base transfer.

For positive weights with fixed-shift ratios tending to 1 and a uniform polynomial bound on those ratios, we prove

det(∑k≥0akq(i+j+1)k)i,j<N∼M(q)3qBNP2N∏k<Nak,0<q<1,

where P=(q;q)∞, BN=∑j<Nj2 and M(q)=∏d≥1(1−qd)−d. Heine’s identity expands the determinant into squared Vandermonde products. We divide by the contribution from the first N nodes and index the remaining tuples by partitions. A bound summable uniformly in N reduces their limiting sum to the unit-weight Cauchy determinant. For Zudilin’s moments, two finite convolutions then give the correction N−8F(1/q) and its constant. We also determine the first formal term CNqBN, where CN=(N!)2(N+1)!/2N.

The formal first term fixes the rank and expands at q=0; the analytic asymptotic fixes q and lets the rank grow. Neither controls the coefficient denominators of an irrationality form. The ratio-limit remark extends the moment calculation to limiting adjacent-weight ratios, while Section 3.3 constructs a rational-value model with the same Hankel features. The latter shows why those features alone cannot imply irrationality. Both arguments are ordinary proofs without Lean proofs in the supplied record, and neither is used for the checked determinant asymptotic.

For the 2004 forms, we calculate the degree after cancelling the common polynomial factors. At a reduced rational base a/b>1, the resulting polynomials Un,Vn have degrees Wn,Wn−1 and satisfy

log(bWn(Un(a/b)F(a/b)−Vn(a/b)))=(C1log⁡b−C0log⁡a)n2+o(n2).

The form inside the logarithm is positive. Thus it tends to zero when log⁡b/log⁡a<θ∗=C0/C1=0.4056830213840605…. Rationality of F(a/b) would make a fixed integer multiple of every such value a positive integer, giving a contradiction. The constants and parameter direction are Zudilin’s; the cancellation and rational evaluation give the region used here. It contains 31/4 and all its positive integral powers. Bundschuh and Väänänen already treated a smaller rational-base region containing 7/2 [6]; Section 8 checks that specialisation. The value 3/2 lies outside both regions and remains unresolved by these arguments. It has the smallest height among reduced noninteger rationals greater than 1, where the height of r/s is max(r,s).

Section 2 gives the rational-base proof and its degree restrictions. Section 3 contains the determinant arguments and the coefficient-moment calculations. The coefficient pencil is treated for sizes N≤8 and every p>1; the computational ranges for shifted minors and coefficientwise positivity are specified there. Positivity for every N and convergence of the largest root remain open. Sections 4–5 apply rescaling and additive congruences to divided forms, including a quantitative bounded-fibre criterion. Sections 6–9 give the clearing, tail and exponent calculations, and Section 10 distinguishes unrestricted reformulations of irrationality from questions about specified approximation families.

All logarithms are natural, and empty products and determinants equal 1. Constants in Ox(⋅) may depend on the fixed base. We introduce the notation for each construction as it is needed. Appendix A identifies the formal sources and the separate finite computations.

Keywords. irrationality; Lambert series; rational base; Padé approximation; Lean 4. MSC 2020. 11J72 (primary); 11J82, 68V20 (secondary).

About this paper

Authorship and AI use. Will Cook built and directed the research infrastructure and maintains the public release. He reviewed claims when he could. AI agents did most of the research and drafting. Cook did not independently verify every claim.

Cite and contact. Cite this paper by its title, author and date above, with its PDF; cite the earlier sources it uses for a mathematical result. For software, use the release citation and give the commit used. Contact Will with questions or corrections.

Prefer the manuscript?

Equations typeset from the exact TeX. Rendered from the LaTeX manuscript source with file fingerprint sha256:1f04580702ed8f8c. Its file fingerprint matched the published source record, so the PDF above, the LaTeX, and this page are one manuscript. Redeploying the site regenerates this page from whatever the public repository holds at that moment.