Plectis

Long paper

Reciprocal Sums and the Sylvester Recurrence: Further Results and Proofs

Summary. Integer finite differences exclude nonintegral regular rates and reduce the cubic rate to a polynomial. A square condition in the cubic field and congruences modulo seven then prove irrationality. For rational reciprocal sums with an+1/an2 tending to one, the record derives sufficient Sylvester-recurrence criteria from persistent divisors, bounded numerator increases and weighted crossings of new maxima. The arithmetic estimates needed to apply these criteria to every rational reciprocal sum remain open.

This paper covers cubic and nonintegral regular-rate irrationality, integer-tail arithmetic and sufficient Sylvester-recurrence criteria, with their separate hypotheses and remaining estimates.

It does not establish the validity of claims tagged Lean, which belongs to the cited kernel-checked source, or a solution to ErdΕ‘s #243, which remains open.

In this paper

The square condition forces m=12

Lemma 2.9 (classification of the scales). Let m be a positive integer, let c∈{βˆ’1,1} and Ξ·=6c/m, and suppose T3βˆ’T+Ξ· is irreducible over Q with a root Ξ± such that Ξ±2βˆ’1 is a square in Q(Ξ±)Γ—. Then m=12.

Proof. Choose β∈Q(Ξ±) with Ξ²2=Ξ±2βˆ’1. The identity (Ξ±+Ξ²)(Ξ±βˆ’Ξ²)=1 gives a reciprocal pair in the cubic field. Taking z=Ξ±+Ξ², we obtain

(7)zβˆ’1=Ξ±βˆ’Ξ²,Ξ±=12(z+zβˆ’1),

and z generates Q(Ξ±). Write its minimal polynomial as p(Z)=Z3+bZ2+dZ+w with b,d,w∈Q and wβ‰ 0. The minimal polynomial of zβˆ’1 is

Z3p(Zβˆ’1)w=Z3+dwZ2+bwZ+1w.

Thus Newton’s identities apply directly to both z and its inverse. We use the first two traces of Ξ± to restrict these coefficients, then the third trace to impose Ξ·=6c/m. All traces below are from Q(Ξ±) to Q. The polynomial T3βˆ’T+Ξ· gives

(8)Tr⁑α=0,Tr⁑α2=2,Tr⁑α3=βˆ’3Ξ·.

Newton’s identities give Tr⁑z=βˆ’b and Tr⁑zβˆ’1=βˆ’d/w, so the first equation in (8) and (7) give

(9)d=βˆ’bw.

For the second trace, Newton’s identities and d=βˆ’bw give

Tr⁑z2=b2+2bw,Tr⁑zβˆ’2=b2βˆ’2b/w.

Since the trace of 1 is 3, squaring (7) yields 4Tr⁑α2=Tr⁑z2+6+Tr⁑zβˆ’2. Substituting Tr⁑α2=2 gives b2+b(wβˆ’wβˆ’1)=1. Multiplication by w factors this equation:

(10)(bwβˆ’1)(b+w)=0.

For the third trace, the same identities give

Tr⁑z3=βˆ’b3βˆ’3b2wβˆ’3w,Tr⁑zβˆ’3=b3βˆ’3b2/wβˆ’3/w.

The cross terms in (z+zβˆ’1)3 have trace 3(Tr⁑z+Tr⁑zβˆ’1)=0 by (9). Thus 8Tr⁑α3=Tr⁑z3+Tr⁑zβˆ’3. Using Tr⁑α3=βˆ’3Ξ· now gives

(11)Ξ·=(b2+1)(w+wβˆ’1)8.

By (10), either b=βˆ’w or b=wβˆ’1, and (11) becomes

Ξ·=(w2+1)28worΞ·=(w2+1)28w3.

Write w=r/s with r∈Z\{0}, s∈Z>0 and gcd(r,s)=1. Since η=6c/m,

(12)m=48crs3(r2+s2)2orm=48cr3s(r2+s2)2.

Now gcd(r2+s2,rs)=1, so integrality of m and |c|=1 force (r2+s2)2∣48, hence r2+s2∈{1,2,4}. With rβ‰ 0 and sβ‰₯1 the value 1 is too small, and 4 is not a sum of two nonzero squares, so r2+s2=2 and |r|=s=1. Then (12) gives m=12cr, and m>0 gives m=12.Β β—»

The square condition leaves the two possible cubics

(13)Q12,Β±1(n)=2n(n+1)(n+2)Β±1.

The square condition uses three consecutive numerators. The last step also uses the preceding denominator update, so it tests four consecutive numerators instead.

About this paper

Authorship and AI use. Will Cook built and directed the research infrastructure and maintains the public release. He reviewed claims when he could. AI agents did most of the research and drafting. Cook did not independently verify every claim.

Cite and contact. Cite this paper by its title, author and date above, with its PDF; cite the earlier sources it uses for a mathematical result. For software, use the release citation and give the commit used. Contact Will with questions or corrections.

Prefer the manuscript?

Equations typeset from the exact TeX. Rendered from the LaTeX manuscript source with file fingerprint sha256:92512a9aa35a79c5. Its file fingerprint matched the published source record, so the PDF above, the LaTeX, and this page are one manuscript. Redeploying the site regenerates this page from whatever the public repository holds at that moment.