Plectis

Long paper

Geometric Moments and Rational Lambert Values: Proofs and Further Results

Summary. The record proves the fixed-base Hankel asymptotic for Zudilin's normalised moments and the rational-base irrationality criterion log b/log a<0.4056830213840605…. The determinant proof separates geometric node configurations from positive weights; the irrationality proof instead specialises Zudilin's 2004 polynomial forms after cancellation. Coefficient moments, evaluated lattices and congruence conditions distinguish integer divisibility from nonzero remainder decay. A broader ratio-limit argument and a rational-value model remain unformalised. None of these arguments settles F(3/2).

This paper covers the sharp fixed-base Hankel asymptotic and rational-base irrationality proofs, coefficient moments and arithmetic obstructions, with ordinary ratio-limit and rational-value models distinguished from checked results.

It does not establish the validity of claims tagged Lean, which belongs to the cited kernel-checked source, or a solution to Erdős #1049, which remains open.

In this paper
Formal continued fractions and finite quadrature.

Write Dn=Dn,0, En=Dn,1, with D0=E0=1. All these determinant polynomials are nonzero by the all-rank degree calculation above. The classical Stieltjes continued fraction is thus defined over the rational-function field Q(p), with the convention

∑m≥0sm(p)zm=11−λ1z1−λ2z1−⋯,
λ2n−1=EnDn−1DnEn−1,λ2n=Dn+1En−1EnDn(n≥1).

Here s0=1, and the identity is in Q(p)[[z]]. The classical moment correspondence is recalled in [37]. Specialising a ratio at a fixed real p requires its displayed denominators to be nonzero. The sixteen certificates ensure this and λ1,…,λ15>0 for every p≥1; they do not ensure it at all indices. Seeking positive formulas for all these ratios is therefore a specific version of the coefficient-moment question. The generating series has radius of convergence zero for every p≥1, so the displayed identity must be read formally. At p=1 this follows from sm(1)=(m!)3. For p>1, the k=0 term of the positive expansion for Rm and the inequality [m]p!≥pm(m−1)/2 give

sm(p)≥p2m2−m.

Thus sm(p)1/m→∞. This concerns the moment power series; it does not decide convergence of the continued fraction at an individual nonzero value of z.

The same certificates also give a finite representing measure: for each fixed p≥1, eight positive atoms reproduce exactly s0,…,s15. The construction uses only the two certified 8×8 matrices, not positivity at higher ranks. Set

H0=(si+j)i,j<8,H1=(si+j+1)i,j<8,T=H0−1H1,

and give R8 the inner product ⟨u,v⟩=uTH0v. The operator T is self-adjoint and positive definite because H0T=H1 is symmetric and positive definite. If e0,…,e7 are the coordinate vectors, the Hankel identities give Tej=ej+1 for 0≤j<7. Hence e0 is cyclic: its first eight iterates form a basis. The spectral theorem now gives eight distinct positive eigenvalues and a positive weight at each, namely the squared norm of the corresponding projection of e0. Cyclicity ensures that no projection vanishes and that no eigenspace has dimension greater than one.

Let ν be the resulting atomic measure. For 0≤m≤14, choose i,j≤7 with i+j=m. Self-adjointness gives

∫xmdν(x)=⟨Tme0,e0⟩=⟨ei,ej⟩=sm.

For the last moment,

∫x15dν(x)=⟨T7e0,TT7e0⟩=e7TH1e7=s15.

The weights sum to s0=1. Hence the measure agrees with the moment functional on every polynomial of degree at most 15; this is the degree range certified for the eight-node quadrature obtained here. In an orthonormal polynomial basis it is the classical Jacobi construction; Golub and Welsch describe the computation of its nodes and weights [41]. Nothing here identifies the subsequent moments of ν with s16,s17,…. This finite construction must also be distinguished from the coefficient pencil (AN,BN). For rational modifications of an already known moment functional, see Krattenthaler [32]; such a modification producing the entire sequence sm has not been identified.

About this paper

Authorship and AI use. Will Cook built and directed the research infrastructure and maintains the public release. He reviewed claims when he could. AI agents did most of the research and drafting. Cook did not independently verify every claim.

Cite and contact. Cite this paper by its title, author and date above, with its PDF; cite the earlier sources it uses for a mathematical result. For software, use the release citation and give the commit used. Contact Will with questions or corrections.

Prefer the manuscript?

Equations typeset from the exact TeX. Rendered from the LaTeX manuscript source with file fingerprint sha256:1f04580702ed8f8c. Its file fingerprint matched the published source record, so the PDF above, the LaTeX, and this page are one manuscript. Redeploying the site regenerates this page from whatever the public repository holds at that moment.