Plectis

Long paper

Factorial Linear Forms and Denominators: Detailed Proofs and Rationality Criteria

Erdős #68 By 1 September 2026; revised 7 October 2026 Authorship, AI use and citation

Summary. The record proves liminf (log LN)/(N3/2 log N) ≥22/3 for L_N=lcm(2!−1,…,N!−1), by comparing a terminal block of denominators with pairwise gcds rather than an external multiplicity theorem. Specialising a Louwsma–Martino valuation, it exhibits primes 139 and 2593 absent from all later reduced denominators. Coefficient constructions give integer forms MS+k; at fixed moment the remainder changes only by an integer. Rationality criteria use factorial digits and the next integer above a scaled partial sum; the digit argument also recovers the irrationality of e. Two exact calculations give q∤299999! and q≥239990>1012038. These exclusions do not prove irrationality.

This paper covers the complete problem-specific reasoning surface for Erdős #68, including all registered result families and their boundaries.

It does not establish the validity of claims tagged Lean, which belongs to the cited kernel-checked source, or a solution to Erdős #68, which remains open.

In this paper

A superseded deduction

Factorial-congruence multiplicities give another lower bound for LN. Its exponent is weaker than that of the terminal-block argument in §3. We include the deduction to specify what follows from this external input. For an odd prime r, let mr count the indices 2≤n≤N with r∣n!−1; such an index satisfies n<r. The factorial-congruence multiplicity estimate of Garaev, Luca and Shparlinski [7], applied to the residue a=1 on 1≤n≤min(N,r−1), gives mr≪N2/3; the prime 2 divides none of these factors. The sum of the exponents at a prime is at most the number of occurrences times the largest exponent, which is its exponent in LN. Thus

∑n=2Nlog⁡(n!−1)=∑r∑n=2Nvr(n!−1)log⁡r≤(maxrmr)log⁡LN≪N2/3log⁡LN,

and Stirling’s formula makes the left side ≍N2log⁡N, whence log⁡LN≫N4/3log⁡N. Theorem 3.4 supersedes this: its exponent is 3/2, its constant is explicit, and it does not use the external multiplicity theorem. The deduction is retained because it is the only place a multiplicity bound enters the record.

Dividing all coefficients by their gcd does not evade the lcm restriction: the resulting integer vector still has V2=⋯=VD=0, so its value of M is still divisible by LD. For the nonzero cofactor vector, §1.5 justifies normalisation by identifying the primitive progression vector. It supplies no proof that the remainder is nonintegral. No formalised primitive cofactor construction is claimed here.

About this paper

Authorship and AI use. Will Cook built and directed the research infrastructure and maintains the public release. He reviewed claims when he could. AI agents did most of the research and drafting. Cook did not independently verify every claim.

Cite and contact. Cite this paper by its title, author and date above, with its PDF; cite the earlier sources it uses for a mathematical result. For software, use the release citation and give the commit used. Contact Will with questions or corrections.

Prefer the manuscript?

Equations typeset from the exact TeX. Rendered from the LaTeX manuscript source with file fingerprint sha256:0af0d85ec1beab46. Its file fingerprint matched the published source record, so the PDF above, the LaTeX, and this page are one manuscript. Redeploying the site regenerates this page from whatever the public repository holds at that moment.