Plectis

Long paper

Factorial Linear Forms and Denominators: Detailed Proofs and Rationality Criteria

ErdΕ‘s #68 By 1 September 2026; revised 7 October 2026 Authorship, AI use and citation

Summary. The record proves liminf (log LN)/(N3/2 log N) β‰₯22/3 for L_N=lcm(2!βˆ’1,…,N!βˆ’1), by comparing a terminal block of denominators with pairwise gcds rather than an external multiplicity theorem. Specialising a Louwsma–Martino valuation, it exhibits primes 139 and 2593 absent from all later reduced denominators. Coefficient constructions give integer forms MS+k; at fixed moment the remainder changes only by an integer. Rationality criteria use factorial digits and the next integer above a scaled partial sum; the digit argument also recovers the irrationality of e. Two exact calculations give q∀299999! and qβ‰₯239990>1012038. These exclusions do not prove irrationality.

This paper covers the complete problem-specific reasoning surface for ErdΕ‘s #68, including all registered result families and their boundaries.

It does not establish the validity of claims tagged Lean, which belongs to the cited kernel-checked source, or a solution to ErdΕ‘s #68, which remains open.

In this paper

Factorial digits of Sβˆ’e+2

The small perturbation from the reciprocal-factorial series can also be isolated term by term. Subtracting eβˆ’2 leaves the absolutely convergent correction C=βˆ‘nβ‰₯2(n!(n!βˆ’1))βˆ’1. The identity 1/(n!βˆ’1)=1/n!+1/(n!(n!βˆ’1)) gives

(17)S=C+eβˆ’2.

The canonical factorial digits of a real x are am(x)=⌊m!xβŒ‹βˆ’m⌊(mβˆ’1)!xβŒ‹βˆˆ{0,…,mβˆ’1} for mβ‰₯2. At a rational endpoint, the floor convention selects the terminating representation. For example, 1/2=1/2! also equals βˆ‘mβ‰₯3(mβˆ’1)/m!, but its canonical digits are a2=1 and am=0 for mβ‰₯3, not an eventually maximal tail. With this convention, x is rational exactly when its digits vanish from some index on. The criterion goes back to Cantor [5]; Galambos treats the rationality of Cantor series in [6], and Koepf and Schmersau prove the irrationality direction for nonterminating factorial expansions whose digits are not eventually maximal [9].

Proposition 4.2 (rationality and factorial residues).

S∈Q⟺⌊m!CβŒ‹β‰‘βˆ’2(modm)for all sufficiently largeΒ m.

Proof. Put Jm=βˆ‘k=0mm!/k!. Then Jm is an integer, every summand with k<m is divisible by m and the summand at k=m is 1, so Jm≑1(modm); and 0<m!eβˆ’Jm<1 for mβ‰₯2.

Suppose S is rational. For all large m both (mβˆ’1)!S and m!S are integers, so m∣m!S. Multiplying (17) by m! and using βŒŠβˆ’m!eβŒ‹=βˆ’Jmβˆ’1 gives ⌊m!CβŒ‹=m!S+2m!βˆ’Jmβˆ’1β‰‘βˆ’2(modm).

Conversely, assume the congruence from some index on. Because 0≀am(C)<m, for mβ‰₯3 the congruence is equivalent to am(C)=mβˆ’2. Choose N beyond the exceptional indices. The canonical expansion gives

C=⌊N!CβŒ‹N!+βˆ‘m>Nmβˆ’2m!,

and the telescope βˆ‘m>N(mβˆ’1)/m!=1/N! turns this into

S=C+eβˆ’2=⌊N!CβŒ‹+1N!+βˆ‘m=2N1m!,

which is rational.Β β—»

The proof applies to every real C, not just this series: eventual digits am(C)=mβˆ’2 characterize rationality of C+eβˆ’2. Thus C=2βˆ’e satisfies the eventual pattern, whereas C=0 does not. For our particular positive C, neither possibility is decided by a finite digit list.

Negating the eventual congruence gives the equivalent formulation

(18)Sβˆ‰Q⟺(βˆ€B)(βˆƒm>B)Β (⌊m!CβŒ‹+2)modmβ‰ 0.

It remains to prove failures of this congruence at arbitrarily large indices for this particular C. A finite list of failures does not settle this question, and the equivalence gives no distribution estimate.

Recovering the finite carries.

To compare canonical digits with the carries, we must account for the tail removed before taking a floor. Set

Ξ΄m=m!βˆ‘n>m1n!(n!βˆ’1),Οƒm=1{{m!C}<Ξ΄m}.

Here {x}=xβˆ’βŒŠxβŒ‹. The factorial-tail bound gives 0<Ξ΄m<1/((m+1)!βˆ’1)<1. Subtracting Ξ΄m from m!C lowers its floor by one exactly when {m!C}<Ξ΄m. Therefore

Zm=m!βˆ‘n=2m1n!+⌊m!CβŒ‹+1βˆ’Οƒm.

Substitution in (12) gives

(19)bm=mβˆ’1βˆ’am(C)+Οƒmβˆ’mΟƒmβˆ’1(mβ‰₯3).

When {m!C}=Ξ΄m, the scaled partial sum is integral and Οƒm=0. For a smaller fractional part, subtracting even this small tail crosses an integer. Tail size alone therefore permits neither correction term to be omitted.

About this paper

Authorship and AI use. Will Cook built and directed the research infrastructure and maintains the public release. He reviewed claims when he could. AI agents did most of the research and drafting. Cook did not independently verify every claim.

Cite and contact. Cite this paper by its title, author and date above, with its PDF; cite the earlier sources it uses for a mathematical result. For software, use the release citation and give the commit used. Contact Will with questions or corrections.

Prefer the manuscript?

Equations typeset from the exact TeX. Rendered from the LaTeX manuscript source with file fingerprint sha256:0af0d85ec1beab46. Its file fingerprint matched the published source record, so the PDF above, the LaTeX, and this page are one manuscript. Redeploying the site regenerates this page from whatever the public repository holds at that moment.