Plectis

Long paper

Prime-Gap Dyadic Series: Perturbations, Exact Criteria and Certificates

Summary. A convergent dyadic series with nonnegative integer coefficients can be made rational by sparse nonnegative corrections of upper Banach density zero, eventually bounded by any f(n)→∞, while preserving every fixed modulus and, for a logarithmic allowance, short-block empirical distributions. For prime gaps the cumulative positions remain asymptotic to n log n; no primality conclusion is asserted. Summation by parts reduces the prime series to the gap series, and the tails TN=∑j≥1gN+j2−j satisfy TN+1=2TN−gN+1. That recurrence characterises rationality and yields finite tests with explicit remainder bounds. An exact finite certificate shows that a rational value of the prime series would have denominator at least 239998>1012040. The bound does not establish irrationality.

This paper covers the complete problem-specific reasoning surface for Erdős #251, including all registered result families and their boundaries.

It does not establish the validity of claims tagged Lean, which belongs to the cited kernel-checked source, or a solution to Erdős #251, which remains open.

In this paper

A rational series with recurring values in every residue class

There is a synthetic integer sequence (an)n≥1 with all of the following properties. Each an is positive and divisible by 2, and

an≤4log⁡(n+1)+24.

For every t≥1, every 0≤r<t, and every cutoff N, there are i,j≥N such that

i≡j≡r(modt),ai=2,aj=4.

For every integer B and cutoff N, some n≥N satisfies an>B. For every h≥1 there is no cutoff after which an+h=an for all n. Nevertheless, all the complete tails

UN=∑j≥1aN+j2j(N≥0)

are integers, U0=6, and UN+h−UN∈Z for every N,h≥0. The sequence

PN=3+∑j=1Naj

is strictly increasing and odd, with PN/(Nlog⁡N)→1. These are synthetic positions; no PN is asserted to be prime.

Enumerate the triples (t,r,m) with t≥1, 0≤r<t and m≥0, each once. The extra index m repeats each residue-class requirement infinitely often; its parity will select the value 2 or 4. At the kth step choose a centre ck≡r(modt), subject to c0≥100, ck+1≥ck+3 and ck≥2k2 for k≥1. Each arithmetic progression is unbounded, so these lower bounds can be met recursively. Set vk=2 for even m and vk=4 for odd m. Thus each value is assigned beyond every cutoff in each residue class. Use the even baseline

bn=6+2⌊log⁡(n+1)2⌋,Un={2bn−1−vk,n=ck,bn,n∉{ck:k≥0},

and define an=2Un−1−Un. The separation of the centres will ensure that ack=vk.

The baseline is even and at least 6. For n≥1, the increase of log⁡(n+1) over two consecutive steps is less than 2, so the floor in the definition gives bn−bn−1∈{0,2} and bn+1−bn−1≤2. Away from a centre and its successor, an=2bn−1−bn≥4. At a centre, ack=vk. Immediately afterwards,

ack+1=4bck−1−2vk−bck+1≥3bck−1−2vk−2≥8.

Since the centres are at least three apart, these cases exhaust all indices. Also 0<Un≤2bn, so an≤4bn−1≤4log⁡(n+1)+24. The indices n=ck+2 lie outside the centres and their successors, because consecutive centres are at least three apart. Along these indices an≥bn−1−2→∞. Thus the sequence is unbounded and cannot be eventually periodic.

Finite telescoping gives

∑j=1maN+j2−j=UN−UN+m2−m.

The bound Un=O(log⁡(n+1)) makes the last term tend to zero. Hence the complete tail equals the integer UN, and its initial value is 6. For the cumulative growth, bn=log⁡(n+1)+O(1) and there are at most 1+log2⁡N centres up to N. Replacing bn by Un changes its partial sum by O((log⁡N)3/2). Therefore

∑j=1Naj=2U0+∑j=1N−1Uj−UN=Nlog⁡N+O(N),

which gives the stated asymptotic for PN.

The full statement is kernel-checked in Lean.

Even with all the displayed growth and recurrence properties, every tail difference is integral. Requiring the values 2 and 4 in every residue class therefore does not supply the signed tail interval. The construction is not a prime-gap sequence: its logarithmic bound excludes the extreme large gaps of the primes, so hypotheses using those gaps are not tested by this example.

About this paper

Authorship and AI use. Will Cook built and directed the research infrastructure and maintains the public release. He reviewed claims when he could. AI agents did most of the research and drafting. Cook did not independently verify every claim.

Cite and contact. Cite this paper by its title, author and date above, with its PDF; cite the earlier sources it uses for a mathematical result. For software, use the release citation and give the commit used. Contact Will with questions or corrections.

Prefer the manuscript?

Equations typeset from the exact TeX. Rendered from the LaTeX manuscript source with file fingerprint sha256:db2a5b20038e07a9. Its file fingerprint matched the published source record, so the PDF above, the LaTeX, and this page are one manuscript. Redeploying the site regenerates this page from whatever the public repository holds at that moment.