Long paper
Prime-Gap Dyadic Series: Perturbations, Exact Criteria and Certificates
Summary. A convergent dyadic series with nonnegative integer coefficients can be made rational by sparse nonnegative corrections of upper Banach density zero, eventually bounded by any f(n)→∞, while preserving every fixed modulus and, for a logarithmic allowance, short-block empirical distributions. For prime gaps the cumulative positions remain asymptotic to n log n; no primality conclusion is asserted. Summation by parts reduces the prime series to the gap series, and the tails
Start here, by the editorial route
In this paper
Introduction
The primes
Its irrationality is Erdős
Problem #251 [22],
recorded in [1], [2] and [4]. Writing
Theorem 2.1 shows that a substantial collection of coefficient properties does not determine rationality among comparison sequences. Starting with any convergent nonnegative integer dyadic series, it attains an interval of sums using corrections on one sparse set. That set and every eventual coefficient and partial-sum congruence cutoff are fixed before the target. The family therefore contains both rational and irrational sums, not merely a separately chosen example for each preserved property. The corrections can respect any prescribed bound tending to infinity.
At each stage a fixed ordinary correction total protects the
congruence calculations at later stages. Redistributing that total
between adjacent indices changes its dyadic contribution. Growing digit
ranges compensate for the dyadic decay across the increasingly separated
stages. A telescoping estimate then ensures that the remaining range
spans every gap between adjacent present choices. With a polylogarithmic
correction bound, the empirical block laws remain asymptotically equal
for lengths
The actual-prime arguments, beginning in Section 4, are independent of the construction. Summation by parts and a vanishing boundary condition identify the complete tails. Integral shifts then give exact rationality criteria; two consecutive small differences with unequal gaps give a sufficient condition for irrationality. Section 6 certifies individual differences, while Section 7 excludes finite ranges of rational denominators. Neither finite calculation supplies arbitrarily late witnesses. Section 8 tests weaker coefficient conditions by counterexamples; the appendices retain the integer calculations, further criteria and source concordance.
For reference, the first primes and gaps are
Thus
so it has the same rationality status. The formal factor-of-two identity uses these same finite sums.
Notation.
We write
About this paper
Authorship and AI use. Will Cook built and directed the research infrastructure and maintains the public release. He reviewed claims when he could. AI agents did most of the research and drafting. Cook did not independently verify every claim.
Cite and contact. Cite this paper by its title, author and date above, with its PDF; cite the earlier sources it uses for a mathematical result. For software, use the release citation and give the commit used. Contact Will with questions or corrections.
Prefer the manuscript?
Equations typeset from the exact TeX. Rendered from the LaTeX manuscript source with file fingerprint sha256:db2a5b20038e07a9. Its file fingerprint matched the published source record, so the PDF above, the LaTeX, and this page are one manuscript. Redeploying the site regenerates this page from whatever the public repository holds at that moment.