Optimal order of the shortest Egyptian-fraction expansions
Lean is a language for mathematical statements and proofs that a computer can verify. This page shows one statement file from OpenAI’s release, possible paper matches and independent reports. The code-like names below identify the definitions or theorems selected by the proof-verification settings.
Theorem selected for verification:OAI.ShortEgyptian.main
The lines of the Lean statement that state the theorem, then the definitions in the file that it uses.
theoremmain : (∀ a b : ℕ, 1 ≤ a → a < b → ∃ ns : List ℕ, IsExpansion a b ns) ∧ ∃ c₁ c₂ : ℝ, 0 < c₁ ∧ 0 < c₂ ∧ ∃ b₀ : ℕ, 2 ≤ b₀ ∧ ∀ b : ℕ, b₀ ≤ b → c₁ * Real.log (Real.log (b : ℝ)) ≤ (maxMinLength b : ℝ) ∧ (maxMinLength b : ℝ) ≤ c₂ * Real.log (Real.log (b : ℝ)) := bysorry
A Lean statement states the theorem and leaves its proof as sorry on purpose. OpenAI’s proof is in a separate solution module, and a program called Comparator checks that proof against this statement.
Definitions needed to read it
Local definitions the statement names, followed through the definitions they name in turn. The match is by name in the source text, so a name reached only through notation can be missed; the full file is below.
noncomputabledefmaxMinLength (b : ℕ) : ℕ := (Finset.Ico 1 b).sup (fun a => minLength a b)
Possible paper match, with no recorded review
Atlas selected this possible match by comparing words in the Lean statement with every statement in the family. No review of whether the statements mean the same thing is recorded.
Words of the Lean statement, its names split into words, that also appear in the theorem: real, expansions, log and integer. Shared only with the release’s name for the Lean statement or OpenAI’s note on it: denominators and fraction.
There are absolute constants D_M>1, L>0, and S_0>1 with the following property. Put D_X=D_M+2 and D_C=4D_X. For every real S\ge S_0 and every integer C satisfying
e^{D_CS}\le C\le e^{2D_CS},
there are an integer M and a set G\subseteq\{1,\ldots,\lfloor X\rfloor\}, where X=e^{D_XS}, such that
There are absolute constants \(D_M>1\), \(L>0\), and \(S_0>1\) with the
following property. Put \(D_X=D_M+2\) and \(D_C=4D_X\).
For every real \(S\ge S_0\) and every integer \(C\) satisfying
\[
e^{D_CS}\le C\le e^{2D_CS},
\]
there are an integer \(M\) and a set
\(G\subseteq\{1,\ldots,\lfloor X\rfloor\}\), where \(X=e^{D_XS}\), such that
\[
e^S<M\le e^{D_MS},
\qquad
\bigl|\{1,\ldots,\lfloor X\rfloor\}\setminus G\bigr|\le \frac X8.
\]
For each \(u\in G\), the fraction \(u/(MC)\) is a sum of at most
\(L\log S\) unit fractions with integer denominators at least \(2\).
Repetitions are allowed.
Other possible paper matches, closest wording first
Proposition 8.1 of Short Egyptian fractions. Words of the Lean statement, its names split into words, that also appear in the theorem: log and integer. Shared only with the release’s name for the Lean statement or OpenAI’s note on it: denominator and fractions.
Corollary 1.3 of Short Egyptian fractions. Words of the Lean statement, its names split into words, that also appear in the theorem: log and integer. Shared only with the release’s name for the Lean statement or OpenAI’s note on it: theta.
Theorem 1.1 of Short Egyptian fractions. Words of the Lean statement, its names split into words, that also appear in the theorem: log and integer.
Corollary 1.2 of Short Egyptian fractions. Words of the Lean statement, its names split into words, that also appear in the theorem: log and integer.
How Atlas selects possible matches: it compares words in the Lean statement with every statement in the family. It also splits Lean names into words. The release’s label and note receive less weight; a main theorem wins a close match. If the Lean wording yields no clear match, Atlas uses the catalogue description. This selects passages to compare; it does not establish that they mean the same thing.
Reported Comparator runs
two independent groups report that Comparator accepted runs for this Lean statement file: Carlos Toledo’s cert-machine; MathVet. Each group reports its own Comparator run for this statement file. Atlas has not repeated the runs.
For a configured theorem, Comparator tests whether OpenAI’s proof proves the exact Lean statement. Some files instead configure definitions for comparison by name and type. Acceptance does not establish that the statement means the same thing as the paper’s theorem.
Every Comparator challenge re-run on Linux with nanoda switched on, decided by a preregistered rule; every family’s challenge statements read against OpenAI’s headline, clause by clause. Decider: Comparator (leanprover/comparator d03acab1 = tag v4.34.0, built with the release’s toolchain v4.34.1), lean4export 076e8e57, landrun 811cfff5, nanoda_lib 3a240721 — on GitHub’s Linux runners (.github/workflows/openai-math-kernel.yml), one j…
AcceptedTheir term: “CERTIFIED”.
Re-run through Comparator with the independent nanoda kernel switched on: Lean’s kernel and nanoda both accept OpenAI’s solution.
An independent, model-assisted, pre-referee reading of each family’s challenge statements against its headline claim under a published rubric (PROTOCOL.md), with its own Comparator runs per challenge. Its protocol describes a planned error-rate study; this import does not establish that the study has been completed.
AcceptedTheir term: “comparator-sandboxed-pass”.
Re-run through Comparator in a sandboxed virtual machine: accepted.
If Comparator is run under this configuration and accepts, the solution proves the configured theorem using only the allowed axioms, and the Lean kernel accepts every step.
This configuration lists no definition holes, so every definition the statement uses is compared as it is written in this file.
Acceptance leaves open whether the Lean statement means the same thing as the paper’s theorem, whether the paper’s other claims are correct, and whether the result is new. Those questions require comparing the definitions and statements, reviewing the paper’s arguments, and reading the earlier literature.
Do family 025’s Lean statements express the advertised result?
These assessments compare all the family’s Lean statements with the whole result OpenAI describes in its catalogue. They do not assess this statement alone. Each group uses its own published rules.
MathVet and cert-machine agree on how much of the advertised result the Lean statements express.
OpenAI’s own note on what this Lean statement covers
“The formalization proves that every $a/b$ with $1\le a<b$ has such an expansion and that the largest minimum length at denominator $b$ is $\Theta(\log\log b)$.”
An AI agent drafted an interpretation of that note, classifying this statement as “states a paper’s theorem as the paper does”. No human review of the draft is recorded.
Supporting material
The complete Lean statement file
27 lines, copied from release version fd4aeeb. A name defined in this file links to its line; pointing at the name shows its definition.
Declared in this fileOpenAI’s library at fd4aeebOther linked names open the current documentation for Mathlib, Lean’s mathematical library.
Links in the file: 5 to its own declarations, 9 to Mathlib’s documentation. 4 declared names also link to the same declaration in OpenAI’s library. OpenAI uses Mathlib version d13f23b. The linked documentation describes the current version, so names that have since changed may be missing there.
import Mathlibnamespace OAInamespace ShortEgyptiandefIsExpansion (a b : ℕ) (ns : Listℕ) : Prop := ns.Pairwise (· < ·) ∧ (∀ n ∈ ns, 2 ≤ n) ∧ (ns.map (fun n => (1 : ℚ) / (n : ℚ))).sum = (a : ℚ) / (b : ℚ)noncomputabledefminLength (a b : ℕ) : ℕ :=sInf {k : ℕ | ∃ ns : Listℕ, IsExpansion a b ns ∧ ns.length = k}noncomputabledefmaxMinLength (b : ℕ) : ℕ := (Finset.Ico1 b).sup (fun a => minLength a b)theoremmain : (∀ a b : ℕ, 1 ≤ a → a < b → ∃ ns : Listℕ, IsExpansion a b ns) ∧ ∃ c₁ c₂ : ℝ, 0 < c₁ ∧ 0 < c₂ ∧ ∃ b₀ : ℕ, 2 ≤ b₀ ∧ ∀ b : ℕ, b₀ ≤ b → c₁ * Real.log (Real.log (b : ℝ)) ≤ (maxMinLength b : ℝ) ∧ (maxMinLength b : ℝ) ≤ c₂ * Real.log (Real.log (b : ℝ)) := bysorryend ShortEgyptianend OAI
Every extracted statement of the accompanying papers
The statements the atlas extracted automatically from each accompanying paper’s TeX source, with links to the full sources.
There are absolute constants $c_1,c_2>0$ and $b_0$ such that, for every
integer $b\ge b_0$,
\[
c_1\log\log b\le N(b)\le c_2\log\log b.
\]
In particular, the upper bound holds for every integer numerator
$1\le a<b$.
Corollary
There are absolute constants c,C>0 and k_0 such that, for every integer k\ge k_0,
Equivalently for the lower bound, every fixed c<\log2/257 satisfies v(k)\ge\exp(\exp(ck)) for every sufficiently large integer k. In particular \log\log v(k)=\Theta(k).
For every sufficiently large integer $k$,
\[
\exp\bigl(\exp(k/600)\bigr)\le v(k)\le1+k^{2^{k-1}}.
\]
More precisely,
\[
\frac{\log2}{257}
\le\liminf_{k\to\infty}\frac{\log\log v(k)}k
\le\limsup_{k\to\infty}\frac{\log\log v(k)}k
\le\log2.
\]
Equivalently for the lower bound, every fixed $c<\log2/257$ satisfies
$v(k)\ge\exp(\exp(ck))$ for every sufficiently large integer $k$.
In particular $\log\log v(k)=\Theta(k)$.
OpenAI’s Lean catalogue does not list this as a main result; the release’s Lean notes for family 025 link it.
Solution module
OAI.NumberTheory.ShortEgyptian.Main
Allowed axioms
propext, Quot.sound, Classical.choiceThe axioms this configuration allows a proof to use. A replay shows which of them a proof uses.
Imports
Mathlib
Imports from outside Mathlib
None
Local vocabulary
3 local vocabulary declarations
Lines of Lean, without comments or blank lines
14
Second proof-verification program (nanoda)
Off in OpenAI's configuration.
Statement comparison
A shareable summary of this page: the proposed paper match, what the Lean statement expresses, and which reviews are recorded.
Plectis Atlas
Optimal order of the shortest Egyptian-fraction expansions
Family 025: Short Egyptian fractions
Candidate pairing
Proposition (A dense set of short expansions)
There are absolute constants D_M>1, L>0, and S_0>1 with the following property. Put D_X=D_M+2 and D_C=4D_X. For every real S\ge S_0 and every integer C satisfying
e^{D_CS}\le C\le e^{2D_CS},
there are an integer M and a set G\subseteq\{1,\ldots,\lfloor X\rfloor\}, where X=e^{D_XS}, such that
For each u\in G, the fraction u/(MC) is a sum of at most L\log S unit fractions with integer denominators at least 2. Repetitions are allowed.
Short Egyptian fractions
TeX label prop:density, build/elementary.tex, line 7
The Lean statement says
theoremmain : (∀ a b : ℕ, 1 ≤ a → a < b → ∃ ns : List ℕ, IsExpansion a b ns) ∧ ∃ c₁ c₂ : ℝ, 0 < c₁ ∧ 0 < c₂ ∧ ∃ b₀ : ℕ, 2 ≤ b₀ ∧ ∀ b : ℕ, b₀ ≤ b → c₁ * Real.log (Real.log (b : ℝ)) ≤ (maxMinLength b : ℝ) ∧ (maxMinLength b : ℝ) ≤ c₂ * Real.log (Real.log (b : ℝ)) := bysorry
A Lean statement states the theorem and leaves its proof as sorry on purpose. OpenAI’s proof is in a separate solution module, and a program called Comparator checks that proof against this statement.
Recorded comparisons with the paper
Atlas records no contributed comparison of this statement with the paper.
Contributed Comparator run reports
Atlas records no contributed report of running Comparator for this statement file.
More about this statement
Commentary Bloom lists Erdős 148, 293 and 304 as three unit fraction results from one 33-page PDF, names the previous best bounds, and links one formalisation. Thomas Bloom, Erdős problems in the OpenAI proofs, 2026-10-08Source
Explanation A simplified human-written proof gives an explicit constant of about 23 for the number of unit fractions against about 371 in the manuscript, and the same argument yields the two related Erdős problems. Woett, Short Egyptian fractions (a simplified write-up), 2026-10-10Source
Commentary The same author reports that the manuscript proves the main bound in a hard twenty-page argument and then uses a different, easier argument for one corollary, and that the formalisations of two of the problems go through the hard proof while the third modifies the easy one to avoid a deep prime number theorem. Woett, Short Egyptian fractions (a simplified write-up), 2026-10-10Source