Plectis Atlas
Information growth under repeated exact Gaussian observations
Family 140: Memory–sample lower bounds for noiseless Gaussian regression
Candidate pairing
Theorem (Repeated localization)
There is an absolute constant c>0 with the following property. For any fixed C_0>0, consider the experiment above with t\ge0 blocks and N\ge1 possible message values, and suppose
One can reveal nested dyadic cells Q_0\supset Q_1\supset\cdots\supset Q_t containing Z, where Q_i is a finite-valued measurable function of Z, the preceding revelations, and W_1,\ldots,W_i, so that the augmented transcript
satisfies
Here C is a constant depending only on C_0. If J_t is the level of Q_t, the construction also gives \E J_t\le Ct.
Localization costs and information growth for exact Gaussian observations
TeX label ld:thm:main, build/sections/02-dyadic.tex, line 54
The Lean statement says
def MainStatement : Prop := ∃ c : ℝ, 0 < c ∧ ∃ n₀ : ℕ, ∀ C₀ : ℝ, 0 < C₀ → ∃ C : ℝ, 0 < C ∧ ∀ (n N t : ℕ), n₀ ≤ n → 1 ≤ N → ∀ rules : Rules n N t, (2 / (n / 8 : ℕ) + Real.exp (-c * (n / 16 : ℕ))) * Real.log N ≤ C₀ * (n + 1) → ∃ Q : Disclosure n N t, ValidDisclosure Q ∧ mutualInformation (augmentedLaw rules Q) ≤ ENNReal.ofReal (C * (n + 1) * t) ∧ (∫ zw, (finalLevel Q zw : ℝ) ∂experimentLaw rules) ≤ C * ttheorem repeated_localization : MainStatement := by sorrydef InverseVolumeStatement : Prop := ∃ C : ℝ, 0 < C ∧ ∃ d₀ : ℕ, ∀ d : ℕ, d₀ ≤ d → ∀ ν : Measure (Ambient d), IsProbabilityMeasure ν → BallBound ν → ∀ u : Ambient d, (∫⁻ z,inverseVolume u z ∂Measure.pi (fun _ : Fin (d/100) => ν)) ≤ ENNReal.ofReal (Real.exp (C*d*(d/100:ℕ)))theorem inverse_volume_without_support : InverseVolumeStatement := by sorrydef CoercivityStatement : Prop := ∃ C : ℝ, 0 < C ∧ ∃ d₀ : ℕ, ∀ d : ℕ, d₀ ≤ d →A Lean statement states the theorem and leaves its proof as sorry on purpose. OpenAI’s proof is in a separate solution module, and a program called Comparator checks that proof against this statement.