Plectis Atlas
Search

↑ and ↓ move, Enter opens, Esc closes.

Lean statement

Finite-entropy localization and regularization bounds

Lean is a language for mathematical statements and proofs that a computer can verify. This page shows one statement file from OpenAI’s release, possible paper matches and independent reports. The code-like names below identify the definitions or theorems selected by the proof-verification settings.

Theorem selected for verification: OAI.RepeatedLocalization.FiniteEntropy.finite_expected_regularization

Lean statement file: GaussianFiniteEntropy.leanShow on the mapOpenAI’s Lean catalogue does not list this as a main result; the release’s Lean notes for family 140 link it.

The Lean statement

The lines of the Lean statement that state the theorem, then the definitions in the file that it uses.

def FiniteEntropyStatement : Prop :=  ∃ n₀ : ℕ, ∀ n : ℕ, n₀ ≤ n → ∀ Q : Cell n, ∀ P : Measure (Coordinate n),    IsProbabilityMeasure P → P ≪ uniformCell Q → InformationTheory.klDiv P (uniformCell Q) ≠ ∞ →      (∀ᵐ z ∂P, Terminates P Q z) ∧ Measurable (terminalLog P Q) ∧      (∀ h : Log n, P {z | terminalLog P Q z = h} ≠ 0 →        Descendant Q (terminalCell P Q h) ∧ Regular (terminalLaw P Q h) (terminalCell P Q h)) ∧      Integrable (fun z => (depth P Q z : ℝ)) P ∧      Integrable (fun z => (attempts P Q z : ℝ)) P ∧      (∫ z,(attempts P Q z : ℝ) ∂P) ≤ 2*(1+∫ z,(depth P Q z : ℝ) ∂P) ∧      (∫⁻ z,InformationTheory.klDiv (terminalLaw P Q (terminalLog P Q z))          (uniformCell (terminalCell P Q (terminalLog P Q z))) ∂P) +        ENNReal.ofReal ((Real.log 2/4)*n*(∫ z,(depth P Q z : ℝ) ∂P)) ≤          InformationTheory.klDiv P (uniformCell Q) + ENNReal.ofReal (2/Real.exp 1)theorem finite_expected_regularization : FiniteEntropyStatement := by  sorry

A Lean statement states the theorem and leaves its proof as sorry on purpose. OpenAI’s proof is in a separate solution module, and a program called Comparator checks that proof against this statement.

Definitions needed to read it

Local definitions the statement names, followed through the definitions they name in turn. The match is by name in the source text, so a name reached only through notation can be missed; the full file is below.

  • abbreviation OAI.RepeatedLocalization.Coordinate line 10

    abbrev Coordinate (n : ℕ) := Fin n → ℝ
  • abbreviation OAI.RepeatedLocalization.Cell line 14

    abbrev Cell (n : ℕ) := Σ J : ℕ, Fin n → Fin (2 ^ J)
  • definition OAI.RepeatedLocalization.cellSet line 27

    noncomputable def cellSet {n : ℕ} (Q : Cell n) : Set (Coordinate n) :=  {z | ∀ a, -1 / (2 * Real.sqrt n) + (Q.2 a : ℝ) / (Real.sqrt n * (2 : ℝ) ^ Q.1) ≤ z a ∧    z a < -1 / (2 * Real.sqrt n) + ((Q.2 a : ℝ) + 1) / (Real.sqrt n * (2 : ℝ) ^ Q.1)}
  • definition OAI.RepeatedLocalization.FiniteEntropy.uniformCell line 105

    noncomputable def uniformCell {n : ℕ} (Q : Cell n) : Measure (Coordinate n) :=  ProbabilityTheory.cond volume (cellSet Q)
  • definition OAI.RepeatedLocalization.FiniteEntropy.Descendant line 108

    def Descendant {n : ℕ} (Q R : Cell n) : Prop :=  Q.1 ≤ R.1 ∧ cellSet R ⊆ cellSet Q
  • definition OAI.RepeatedLocalization.FiniteEntropy.threshold line 111

    noncomputable def threshold (n h : ℕ) : ℝ := (2:ℝ)^(-(n:ℝ)*h/2)
  • definition OAI.RepeatedLocalization.FiniteEntropy.Heavy line 113

    def Heavy {n : ℕ} (P : Measure (Coordinate n)) (Q R : Cell n) : Prop :=  Descendant Q R ∧ Q.1 < R.1 ∧ threshold n (R.1-Q.1) < (P (cellSet R)).toReal
  • definition OAI.RepeatedLocalization.FiniteEntropy.FirstHeavy line 116

    def FirstHeavy {n : ℕ} (P : Measure (Coordinate n)) (Q R : Cell n) : Prop :=  Heavy P Q R ∧ ∀ E : Cell n, Heavy P Q E → Descendant E R → E = R
  • definition OAI.RepeatedLocalization.FiniteEntropy.residual line 119

    noncomputable def residual {n : ℕ} (P : Measure (Coordinate n)) (Q : Cell n) : Set (Coordinate n) :=  cellSet Q \ ⋃ R : {R : Cell n // FirstHeavy P Q R}, cellSet R.val
  • abbreviation OAI.RepeatedLocalization.FiniteEntropy.Letter line 122

    abbrev Letter (n : ℕ) := Option (Cell n)
  • abbreviation OAI.RepeatedLocalization.FiniteEntropy.Log line 123

    abbrev Log (n : ℕ) := List (Letter n)
  • definition OAI.RepeatedLocalization.FiniteEntropy.branch line 126

    noncomputable def branch {n : ℕ} (P : Measure (Coordinate n)) (Q : Cell n) : Letter n → Set (Coordinate n) := by  classical  exact fun  | none => residual P Q  | some R => if FirstHeavy P Q R then cellSet R else ∅
  • definition OAI.RepeatedLocalization.FiniteEntropy.attemptLetter line 132

    noncomputable def attemptLetter {n : ℕ} (P : Measure (Coordinate n)) (Q : Cell n)    (z : Coordinate n) : Letter n := by  classical  exact if h : ∃ R : Cell n, FirstHeavy P Q R ∧ z ∈ cellSet R then some h.choose else none
  • structure OAI.RepeatedLocalization.FiniteEntropy.State line 137

    structure State (n : ℕ) where  cell : Cell n  event : Set (Coordinate n)  stopped : Bool
  • definition OAI.RepeatedLocalization.FiniteEntropy.update line 142

    noncomputable def update {n : ℕ} (P : Measure (Coordinate n)) (s : State n) (a : Letter n) : State n :=  if s.stopped then s else  let μ := ProbabilityTheory.cond P s.event  let E := branch μ s.cell a  { cell := a.getD s.cell    event := s.event ∩ E    stopped := if a = none then decide ((1/2:ℝ) ≤ (μ E).toReal) else false }
  • definition OAI.RepeatedLocalization.FiniteEntropy.state line 150

    noncomputable def state {n : ℕ} (P : Measure (Coordinate n)) (Q : Cell n) (h : Log n) : State n :=  h.foldl (update P) ⟨Q,cellSet Q,false⟩
  • definition OAI.RepeatedLocalization.FiniteEntropy.run line 153

    noncomputable def run {n : ℕ} (P : Measure (Coordinate n)) (Q : Cell n) : ℕ → Coordinate n → Log n  | 0, _ => []  | N+1, z =>    let h := run P Q N z    let s := state P Q h    if s.stopped then h else      h ++ [attemptLetter (ProbabilityTheory.cond P s.event) s.cell z]
  • definition OAI.RepeatedLocalization.FiniteEntropy.Terminates line 161

    def Terminates {n : ℕ} (P : Measure (Coordinate n)) (Q : Cell n) (z : Coordinate n) : Prop :=  ∃ N, (state P Q (run P Q N z)).stopped = true
  • definition OAI.RepeatedLocalization.FiniteEntropy.attempts line 164

    noncomputable def attempts {n : ℕ} (P : Measure (Coordinate n)) (Q : Cell n) (z : Coordinate n) : ℕ := by  classical  exact if h : Terminates P Q z then Nat.find h else 0
  • definition OAI.RepeatedLocalization.FiniteEntropy.terminalLog line 168

    noncomputable def terminalLog {n : ℕ} (P : Measure (Coordinate n)) (Q : Cell n) (z : Coordinate n) : Log n :=  run P Q (attempts P Q z) z
  • definition OAI.RepeatedLocalization.FiniteEntropy.terminalCell line 171

    noncomputable def terminalCell {n : ℕ} (P : Measure (Coordinate n)) (Q : Cell n) (h : Log n) : Cell n :=  (state P Q h).cell
  • definition OAI.RepeatedLocalization.FiniteEntropy.terminalLaw line 174

    noncomputable def terminalLaw {n : ℕ} (P : Measure (Coordinate n)) (Q : Cell n) (h : Log n) : Measure (Coordinate n) :=  ProbabilityTheory.cond P {z | terminalLog P Q z = h}
  • definition OAI.RepeatedLocalization.FiniteEntropy.depth line 177

    noncomputable def depth {n : ℕ} (P : Measure (Coordinate n)) (Q : Cell n) (z : Coordinate n) : ℕ :=  (terminalCell P Q (terminalLog P Q z)).1-Q.1
  • definition OAI.RepeatedLocalization.FiniteEntropy.Regular line 180

    def Regular {n : ℕ} (P : Measure (Coordinate n)) (Q : Cell n) : Prop :=  P (cellSet Q) = 1 ∧ ∀ R : Cell n, Descendant Q R → Q.1 < R.1 →    (P (cellSet R)).toReal ≤ 2 * threshold n (R.1-Q.1)

No confident match with a paper statement

No paper theorem is paired with this Lean statement.

Why none: no paper statement matches the Lean text clearly enough to pair, so the closest candidates are listed below.

Statements in Localization costs and information growth for exact Gaussian observations come first because the Lean file and module names share words with that paper’s title.

Other possible paper matches, closest wording first

  • Proposition 6.4 of Localization costs and information growth for exact Gaussian observations. Words of the Lean statement, its names split into words, that also appear in the theorem: cells, state, information, integers, finite and log. Shared only with the release’s name for the Lean statement or OpenAI’s note on it: initial, times, one, sufficiently and large.
  • Proposition 10.4 of Localization costs and information growth for exact Gaussian observations. Words of the Lean statement, its names split into words, that also appear in the theorem: update and information. Shared only with the release’s name for the Lean statement or OpenAI’s note on it: initial, localization and one.
  • Proposition 3.2 of Replacing Gaussian observations in memory-constrained inference. Words of the Lean statement, its names split into words, that also appear in the theorem: expectation, integrable, entropy, law, measure, finite and two more. Shared only with the release’s name for the Lean statement or OpenAI’s note on it: surely, almost, dimensions and bounded.
  • Theorem 3.2 of Localization costs and information growth for exact Gaussian observations. Words of the Lean statement, its names split into words, that also appear in the theorem: cells, measurable, finite and log. Found in the paper’s title, which its main theorem states: information. Shared only with the release’s name for the Lean statement or OpenAI’s note on it: localization and one.
  • Corollary 8.4 of Localization costs and information growth for exact Gaussian observations. Words of the Lean statement, its names split into words, that also appear in the theorem: state, threshold, uniform, finite and log. Shared only with the release’s name for the Lean statement or OpenAI’s note on it: dimension, large and sufficiently.

How Atlas selects possible matches: it compares words in the Lean statement with every statement in the family. It also splits Lean names into words. The release’s label and note receive less weight; a main theorem wins a close match. If the Lean wording yields no clear match, Atlas uses the catalogue description. This selects passages to compare; it does not establish that they mean the same thing.

Reported Comparator runs

three independent groups report that Comparator accepted runs for this Lean statement file: Carlos Toledo’s cert-machine; MathVet; Neal McBurnett’s openai-math-lean-tooling. Each group reports its own Comparator run for this statement file. Atlas has not repeated the runs.

For a configured theorem, Comparator tests whether OpenAI’s proof proves the exact Lean statement. Some files instead configure definitions for comparison by name and type. Acceptance does not establish that the statement means the same thing as the paper’s theorem.

Carlos Toledo’s cert-machine

How they ran it, in their words

Every Comparator challenge re-run on Linux with nanoda switched on, decided by a preregistered rule; every family’s challenge statements read against OpenAI’s headline, clause by clause. Decider: Comparator (leanprover/comparator d03acab1 = tag v4.34.0, built with the release’s toolchain v4.34.1), lean4export 076e8e57, landrun 811cfff5, nanoda_lib 3a240721 — on GitHub’s Linux runners (.github/workflows/openai-math-kernel.yml), one j…

  • Accepted Their term: “CERTIFIED”.

    Re-run through Comparator with the independent nanoda kernel switched on: Lean’s kernel and nanoda both accept OpenAI’s solution.

    Reported 10 October 2026, at the release version shown here. Original verification report

MathVet

How they ran it, in their words

An independent, model-assisted, pre-referee reading of each family’s challenge statements against its headline claim under a published rubric (PROTOCOL.md), with its own Comparator runs per challenge. Its protocol describes a planned error-rate study; this import does not establish that the study has been completed.

  • Accepted Their term: “comparator-sandboxed-pass”.

    Re-run through Comparator in a sandboxed virtual machine: accepted.

    Reported 8 October 2026, at the release version shown here. Original verification report

Neal McBurnett’s openai-math-lean-tooling

How they ran it, in their words

Each challenge’s solution is built and checked by Comparator at the pinned release, on Lean leanprover/lean4:v4.34.1, recording the verdict, the check time and the peak memory; the run was still in progress at this snapshot (192 accepted, 224 pending).

  • Accepted Their term: “accepted”.

    Re-run through Comparator with Lean’s kernel: accepted (the check took 228 s; peak memory 6.2 GiB).

    Reported 10 October 2026, at the release version shown here. Original verification report

What an accepted Comparator run would establish

If Comparator is run under this configuration and accepts, the solution proves the configured theorem using only the allowed axioms, and the Lean kernel accepts every step.

This configuration lists no definition holes, so every definition the statement uses is compared as it is written in this file.

Allowed axioms: propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound

Acceptance leaves open whether the Lean statement means the same thing as the paper’s theorem, whether the paper’s other claims are correct, and whether the result is new. Those questions require comparing the definitions and statements, reviewing the paper’s arguments, and reading the earlier literature.

Do family 140’s Lean statements express the advertised result?

These assessments compare all the family’s Lean statements with the whole result OpenAI describes in its catalogue. They do not assess this statement alone. Each group uses its own published rules.

MathVet and cert-machine agree on how much of the advertised result the Lean statements express.

  • MathVet

    Finds the whole advertised result stated or implied Their term: “full”.

    The challenge statements imply the headline claim after unpacking definitions or one routine step. Their record

    Their note: None for the headline; supporting results are in separate files. The learner model gives the learner a free shared seed at every step (a stronger model, so the lower bound is stronger).

    Definitions the group asks readers to compare with the paper: Bespoke finite-memory learner model (Learner, RunStatus, Admissible bundling several AEMeasurable hypotheses, angularError := arccos ⟪ŝ, s⟫, uniformSphere via Measure.toSphere); GaussianInformation.lean also introduces local instance ambientSub/ambientInner re-defining Sub/Inner on EuclideanSpace (supporting file)

  • Carlos Toledo’s cert-machine

    Finds the whole advertised result stated or implied Their term: “MATCHES”.

    The challenge statements state the headline as OpenAI wrote it. Their record

Read the complete assessments on the family page.

OpenAI’s own note on what this Lean statement covers

“For a law of finite relative entropy with respect to a uniform cell law in sufficiently large dimension, the regularization procedure terminates almost surely in regular cells. Its expected depth and number of attempts are finite, with at most twice one plus the expected depth in expectation; the remaining relative entropy plus $(\log 2)n/4$ times the expected depth is at most the initial relative entropy plus $2/e$.”

An AI agent drafted an interpretation of that note, classifying this statement as “states a supporting result”. No human review of the draft is recorded.

Supporting material

The complete Lean statement file

205 lines, copied from release version fd4aeeb. A name defined in this file links to its line; pointing at the name shows its definition.

Declared in this fileOpenAI’s library at fd4aeebOther linked names open the current documentation for Mathlib, Lean’s mathematical library.

Links in the file: 202 to its own declarations, 103 to Mathlib’s documentation. 51 declared names also link to the same declaration in OpenAI’s library. 2 identifiers stay plain because they resolve to no single declaration: variables Lean binds automatically, notation, or names the scan of the pinned sources did not find. 2 of them could name more than one declaration. OpenAI uses Mathlib version d13f23b. The linked documentation describes the current version, so names that have since changed may be missing there.

import Mathlibnamespace OAIopen MeasureTheory ProbabilityTheory Setopen scoped BigOperators ENNRealnamespace RepeatedLocalizationabbrev Coordinate (n : ℕ) := Fin n → ℝabbrev GaussianBlock (n : ℕ) := Fin (n / 16) → Fin (n + 1) → ℝabbrev Label (n : ℕ) := Fin (n / 16) → ℝabbrev History (N t : ℕ) := Fin t → Fin Nabbrev Cell (n : ℕ) := Σ J : ℕ, Fin n → Fin (2 ^ J)instance cellMeasurableSpace (n : ℕ) : MeasurableSpace (Cell n) := ⊤noncomputable def initialCube (n : ℕ) : Set (Coordinate n) :=  Set.pi Set.univ (fun _ => Set.Ico (-1 / (2 * Real.sqrt n)) (1 / (2 * Real.sqrt n)))noncomputable def cubePrior (n : ℕ) : Measure (Coordinate n) :=  ProbabilityTheory.cond volume (initialCube n)noncomputable def chart {n : ℕ} (z : Coordinate n) : Fin (n + 1) → ℝ :=  Fin.lastCases (Real.sqrt (1 - ∑ a, (z a) ^ 2)) znoncomputable def cellSet {n : ℕ} (Q : Cell n) : Set (Coordinate n) :=  {z | ∀ a, -1 / (2 * Real.sqrt n) + (Q.2 a : ℝ) / (Real.sqrt n * (2 : ℝ) ^ Q.1) ≤ z a ∧    z a < -1 / (2 * Real.sqrt n) + ((Q.2 a : ℝ) + 1) / (Real.sqrt n * (2 : ℝ) ^ Q.1)}def rootCell (n : ℕ) : Cell n := ⟨0, fun _ => 0⟩noncomputable def gaussianBlockLaw (n : ℕ) : Measure (GaussianBlock n) :=  Measure.pi (fun _ => Measure.pi (fun _ => gaussianReal 0 1))noncomputable def exactLabel {n : ℕ} (X : GaussianBlock n) (z : Coordinate n) : Label n :=  fun row => ∑ a, X row a * chart z astructure BlockRule (n N : ℕ) where  prob : (GaussianBlock n × Label n) → Fin N → ℝ  measurable_prob : ∀ w, Measurable (fun data => prob data w)  nonneg : ∀ data w, 0 ≤ prob data w  sum_one : ∀ data, ∑ w, prob data w = 1abbrev Rules (n N t : ℕ) := ∀ i : Fin t, History N i.val → BlockRule n Ndef past {N t : ℕ} (w : History N t) (i : Fin t) : History N i.val :=  fun j => w ⟨j.val, Nat.lt_trans j.isLt i.isLt⟩def through {N t : ℕ} (w : History N t) (i : Fin t) : History N (i.val + 1) :=  fun j => w ⟨j.val, Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le j.isLt i.isLt⟩noncomputable def blockProbability {n N : ℕ} (rule : BlockRule n N)    (z : Coordinate n) (w : Fin N) : ℝ :=  ∫ X, rule.prob (X, exactLabel X z) w ∂gaussianBlockLaw nnoncomputable def historyLikelihood {n N t : ℕ} (rules : Rules n N t)    (z : Coordinate n) (w : History N t) : ℝ :=  ∏ i, blockProbability (rules i (past w i)) z (w i)noncomputable def experimentLaw {n N t : ℕ} (rules : Rules n N t) :    Measure (Coordinate n × History N t) :=  ∑ w : History N t,    ((cubePrior n).withDensity (fun z => ENNReal.ofReal (historyLikelihood rules z w))).map      (fun z => (z, w))abbrev Disclosure (n N t : ℕ) := ∀ i : Fin t, Coordinate n → History N (i.val + 1) → Cell ndef ValidDisclosure {n N t : ℕ} (Q : Disclosure n N t) : Prop :=  (∀ i, Measurable (fun zh : Coordinate n × History N (i.val + 1) => Q i zh.1 zh.2)) ∧  (∀ i, (Set.range (fun zh : Coordinate n × History N (i.val + 1) => Q i zh.1 zh.2)).Finite) ∧  (∀ z ∈ initialCube n, ∀ w : History N t, ∀ i,    z ∈ cellSet (Q i z (through w i)) ∧ cellSet (Q i z (through w i)) ⊆ initialCube n) ∧  (∀ z ∈ initialCube n, ∀ w : History N t, ∀ i j : Fin t, i ≤ j →    cellSet (Q j z (through w j)) ⊆ cellSet (Q i z (through w i)))noncomputable def transcriptMap {n N t : ℕ} (Q : Disclosure n N t)    (zw : Coordinate n × History N t) : Coordinate n × (History N t × (Fin t → Cell n)) :=  (zw.1, (zw.2, fun i => Q i zw.1 (through zw.2 i)))noncomputable def augmentedLaw {n N t : ℕ} (rules : Rules n N t) (Q : Disclosure n N t) :=  (experimentLaw rules).map (transcriptMap Q)noncomputable def mutualInformation {α β : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] [MeasurableSpace β]    (μ : Measure (α × β)) : ℝ≥0∞ :=  InformationTheory.klDiv μ ((μ.map Prod.fst).prod (μ.map Prod.snd))noncomputable def finalLevel {n N t : ℕ} (Q : Disclosure n N t)    (zw : Coordinate n × History N t) : ℕ :=  if ht : 0 < t then    let i : Fin t := ⟨t - 1, by omega⟩    (Q i zw.1 (through zw.2 i)).1  else 0def MainStatement : Prop :=  ∃ c : ℝ, 0 < c ∧ ∃ n₀ : ℕ, ∀ C₀ : ℝ, 0 < C₀ →    ∃ C : ℝ, 0 < C ∧ ∀ (n N t : ℕ), n₀ ≤ n → 1 ≤ N → ∀ rules : Rules n N t,      (2 / (n / 8 : ℕ) + Real.exp (-c * (n / 16 : ℕ))) * Real.log N ≤ C₀ * (n + 1) →      ∃ Q : Disclosure n N t, ValidDisclosure Q ∧        mutualInformation (augmentedLaw rules Q) ≤ ENNReal.ofReal (C * (n + 1) * t) ∧        (∫ zw, (finalLevel Q zw : ℝ) ∂experimentLaw rules) ≤ C * tnamespace FiniteEntropynoncomputable def uniformCell {n : ℕ} (Q : Cell n) : Measure (Coordinate n) :=  ProbabilityTheory.cond volume (cellSet Q)def Descendant {n : ℕ} (Q R : Cell n) : Prop :=  Q.1 ≤ R.1 ∧ cellSet R ⊆ cellSet Qnoncomputable def threshold (n h : ℕ) : ℝ := (2:ℝ)^(-(n:ℝ)*h/2)def Heavy {n : ℕ} (P : Measure (Coordinate n)) (Q R : Cell n) : Prop :=  Descendant Q R ∧ Q.1 < R.1 ∧ threshold n (R.1-Q.1) < (P (cellSet R)).toRealdef FirstHeavy {n : ℕ} (P : Measure (Coordinate n)) (Q R : Cell n) : Prop :=  Heavy P Q R ∧ ∀ E : Cell n, Heavy P Q E → Descendant E R → E = Rnoncomputable def residual {n : ℕ} (P : Measure (Coordinate n)) (Q : Cell n) : Set (Coordinate n) :=  cellSet Q \ ⋃ R : {R : Cell n // FirstHeavy P Q R}, cellSet R.valabbrev Letter (n : ℕ) := Option (Cell n)abbrev Log (n : ℕ) := List (Letter n)instance logMeasurableSpace (n : ℕ) : MeasurableSpace (Log n) := ⊤noncomputable def branch {n : ℕ} (P : Measure (Coordinate n)) (Q : Cell n) : Letter n → Set (Coordinate n) := by  classical  exact fun  | none => residual P Q  | some R => if FirstHeavy P Q R then cellSet R else ∅noncomputable def attemptLetter {n : ℕ} (P : Measure (Coordinate n)) (Q : Cell n)    (z : Coordinate n) : Letter n := by  classical  exact if h : ∃ R : Cell n, FirstHeavy P Q R ∧ z ∈ cellSet R then some h.choose else nonestructure State (n : ℕ) where  cell : Cell n  event : Set (Coordinate n)  stopped : Boolnoncomputable def update {n : ℕ} (P : Measure (Coordinate n)) (s : State n) (a : Letter n) : State n :=  if s.stopped then s else  let μ := ProbabilityTheory.cond P s.event  let E := branch μ s.cell a  { cell := a.getD s.cell    event := s.event ∩ E    stopped := if a = none then decide ((1/2:ℝ) ≤ (μ E).toReal) else false }noncomputable def state {n : ℕ} (P : Measure (Coordinate n)) (Q : Cell n) (h : Log n) : State n :=  h.foldl (update P) ⟨Q,cellSet Q,false⟩noncomputable def run {n : ℕ} (P : Measure (Coordinate n)) (Q : Cell n) : ℕ → Coordinate n → Log n  | 0, _ => []  | N+1, z =>    let h := run P Q N z    let s := state P Q h    if s.stopped then h else      h ++ [attemptLetter (ProbabilityTheory.cond P s.event) s.cell z]def Terminates {n : ℕ} (P : Measure (Coordinate n)) (Q : Cell n) (z : Coordinate n) : Prop :=  ∃ N, (state P Q (run P Q N z)).stopped = truenoncomputable def attempts {n : ℕ} (P : Measure (Coordinate n)) (Q : Cell n) (z : Coordinate n) : ℕ := by  classical  exact if h : Terminates P Q z then Nat.find h else 0noncomputable def terminalLog {n : ℕ} (P : Measure (Coordinate n)) (Q : Cell n) (z : Coordinate n) : Log n :=  run P Q (attempts P Q z) znoncomputable def terminalCell {n : ℕ} (P : Measure (Coordinate n)) (Q : Cell n) (h : Log n) : Cell n :=  (state P Q h).cellnoncomputable def terminalLaw {n : ℕ} (P : Measure (Coordinate n)) (Q : Cell n) (h : Log n) : Measure (Coordinate n) :=  ProbabilityTheory.cond P {z | terminalLog P Q z = h}noncomputable def depth {n : ℕ} (P : Measure (Coordinate n)) (Q : Cell n) (z : Coordinate n) : ℕ :=  (terminalCell P Q (terminalLog P Q z)).1-Q.1def Regular {n : ℕ} (P : Measure (Coordinate n)) (Q : Cell n) : Prop :=  P (cellSet Q) = 1 ∧ ∀ R : Cell n, Descendant Q R → Q.1 < R.1 →    (P (cellSet R)).toReal ≤ 2 * threshold n (R.1-Q.1)def FiniteEntropyStatement : Prop :=  ∃ n₀ : ℕ, ∀ n : ℕ, n₀ ≤ n → ∀ Q : Cell n, ∀ P : Measure (Coordinate n),    IsProbabilityMeasure P → P ≪ uniformCell Q → InformationTheory.klDiv P (uniformCell Q) ≠ ∞ →      (∀ᵐ z ∂P, Terminates P Q z) ∧ Measurable (terminalLog P Q) ∧      (∀ h : Log n, P {z | terminalLog P Q z = h} ≠ 0 →        Descendant Q (terminalCell P Q h) ∧ Regular (terminalLaw P Q h) (terminalCell P Q h)) ∧      Integrable (fun z => (depth P Q z : ℝ)) P ∧      Integrable (fun z => (attempts P Q z : ℝ)) P ∧      (∫ z,(attempts P Q z : ℝ) ∂P) ≤ 2*(1+∫ z,(depth P Q z : ℝ) ∂P) ∧      (∫⁻ z,InformationTheory.klDiv (terminalLaw P Q (terminalLog P Q z))          (uniformCell (terminalCell P Q (terminalLog P Q z))) ∂P) +        ENNReal.ofReal ((Real.log 2/4)*n*(∫ z,(depth P Q z : ℝ) ∂P)) ≤          InformationTheory.klDiv P (uniformCell Q) + ENNReal.ofReal (2/Real.exp 1)theorem finite_expected_regularization : FiniteEntropyStatement := by  sorryend FiniteEntropyend RepeatedLocalizationend OAI
Every extracted statement of the accompanying papers

The statements the atlas extracted automatically from each accompanying paper’s TeX source, with links to the full sources.

Memory and precision in noiseless Gaussian regression

Theorem (Memory and precision)

For every fixed finite A>0, there are constants c_A>0 and d_A such that the following holds. Let d\ge d_A, let 0\le M\le Ad^2 be an integer, and let 0<\epsilon\le1/10. For any learner in Definition h:model, draw S\sim\sigma_d independently of the rows and the learner’s data-independent randomness. If

\Prob\{\arccos\ip{\widehat s}{S}\le\epsilon\}\ge\frac23,

then its prescribed horizon satisfies

T\ge c_A\,d\log(1/\epsilon).
Section 1, Exact observations and finite memory Read it in the paper TeX source, line 59
Show the TeX
For every fixed finite \(A>0\), there are constants \(c_A>0\) and
\(d_A\) such that the following holds. Let \(d\ge d_A\), let
\(0\le M\le Ad^2\) be an integer, and let \(0<\epsilon\le1/10\).
For any learner in Definition~\ref{h:model}, draw
\(S\sim\sigma_d\) independently of the rows and the learner's
data-independent randomness. If
\[
 \Prob\{\arccos\ip{\widehat s}{S}\le\epsilon\}\ge\frac23,
\]
then its prescribed horizon satisfies
\[
 T\ge c_A\,d\log(1/\epsilon).
\]
Corollary (Subquadratic memory)

Let M(d)\ge0 be integer-valued with M(d)=o(d^2), and let 0<\epsilon(d)\le1/10 be any accuracy sequence. A family of learners in Definition h:model with uniform-sphere average success at least 2/3 satisfies

T(d)\ge c\,d\log(1/\epsilon(d))

for all sufficiently large d, where c>0 is absolute. The dimension threshold may depend on the memory sequence.

Section 1, Exact observations and finite memory Read it in the paper TeX source, line 81
Show the TeX
Let \(M(d)\ge0\) be integer-valued with \(M(d)=o(d^2)\), and let
\(0<\epsilon(d)\le1/10\) be any accuracy sequence. A family of learners
in Definition~\ref{h:model} with uniform-sphere average success at
least \(2/3\) satisfies
\[
 T(d)\ge c\,d\log(1/\epsilon(d))
\]
for all sufficiently large \(d\), where \(c>0\) is absolute. The
dimension threshold may depend on the memory sequence.
Corollary (A guarantee for every signal)

The conclusions of Theorem h:main and Corollary h:subquadratic also hold when their average-success assumption is replaced by

\Prob\{\arccos\ip{\widehat s}{s}\le\epsilon\}\ge\frac23 \qquad\text{for every }s\in S^{d-1},

where this probability is over the rows and the learner’s randomness.

Section 1, Exact observations and finite memory Read it in the paper TeX source, line 93
Show the TeX
The conclusions of Theorem~\ref{h:main} and
Corollary~\ref{h:subquadratic} also hold when their average-success
assumption is replaced by
\[
 \Prob\{\arccos\ip{\widehat s}{s}\le\epsilon\}\ge\frac23
 \qquad\text{for every }s\in S^{d-1},
\]
where this probability is over the rows and the learner's randomness.

Posterior replicas and conditional information in Gaussian regression

Theorem (Gaussian replica block bound)

For all sufficiently large d, set

k=2\lfloor d/16\rfloor,\qquad m=k,\qquad t=m+1,\qquad \ell=4k.

Suppose p=f\sigma_d is a probability with 0\le f\le L<\infty. In the block experiment above, let A have k rows and let B have \ell rows. There is an absolute constant C such that

I(S;W\mid B,BS) \le \frac{H(W)}{t}+Cd+C\log(2+\log L).

The bound is uniform over the prior, the density bound L, and the message kernel. The labels used to produce W are the exact values AS.

Section 1, Introduction Read it in the paper TeX source, line 81
Show the TeX
For all sufficiently large $d$, set
\[
 k=2\lfloor d/16\rfloor,\qquad m=k,\qquad t=m+1,\qquad \ell=4k.
\]
Suppose $p=f\sigma_d$ is a probability with $0\le f\le L<\infty$.
In the block experiment above, let $A$ have $k$ rows and let $B$ have
$\ell$ rows. There is an absolute constant $C$ such that
\begin{equation}
 I(S;W\mid B,BS)
 \le \frac{H(W)}{t}+Cd+C\log(2+\log L).
\end{equation}
The bound is uniform over the prior, the density bound $L$, and the message
kernel. The labels used to produce $W$ are the exact values $AS$.
Theorem (Uniform-prior sample lower bound)

Let M(d)=o(d^2) be nonnegative integer-valued, and let 0<\epsilon(d)\le1/10. Suppose a family of learners in Definition def:streaming-model satisfies

\Prob\{\arccos\langle\widehat S,S\rangle\le\epsilon(d)\}\ge\frac23 \qquad\text{when }S\sim\sigma_d,

where the probability includes the signal, samples, and learner randomness. Then there is an absolute c>0 such that

T(d)\ge c\,d\log\frac1{\epsilon(d)}

for all sufficiently large d. The eventual threshold may depend on the memory sequence.

Section 1, Introduction Read it in the paper TeX source, line 147
Show the TeX
Let $M(d)=o(d^2)$ be nonnegative integer-valued, and let
$0<\epsilon(d)\le1/10$. Suppose a family of learners in
Definition~\ref{def:streaming-model} satisfies
\[
 \Prob\{\arccos\langle\widehat S,S\rangle\le\epsilon(d)\}\ge\frac23
 \qquad\text{when }S\sim\sigma_d,
\]
where the probability includes the signal, samples, and learner randomness.
Then there is an absolute $c>0$ such that
\[
 T(d)\ge c\,d\log\frac1{\epsilon(d)}
\]
for all sufficiently large $d$. The eventual threshold may depend on the
memory sequence.

Localization costs and information growth for exact Gaussian observations

Theorem (Repeated localization)

There is an absolute constant c>0 with the following property. For any fixed C_0>0, consider the experiment above with t\ge0 blocks and N\ge1 possible message values, and suppose

\bigl(2/m+e^{-ck}\bigr)\log N\le C_0d.

One can reveal nested dyadic cells Q_0\supset Q_1\supset\cdots\supset Q_t containing Z, where Q_i is a finite-valued measurable function of Z, the preceding revelations, and W_1,\ldots,W_i, so that the augmented transcript

\Pi_t=(W_1,Q_1,\ldots,W_t,Q_t)

satisfies

I(Z;\Pi_t)\le Cdt.

Here C is a constant depending only on C_0. If J_t is the level of Q_t, the construction also gives \E J_t\le Ct.

Section 3, Dyadic localization and its information cost Read it in the paper TeX source, line 54
Show the TeX
There is an absolute constant $c>0$ with the following property.
For any fixed $C_0>0$, consider the experiment above with $t\ge0$
blocks and $N\ge1$ possible message values, and suppose
\begin{equation}
 \bigl(2/m+e^{-ck}\bigr)\log N\le C_0d.
\end{equation}
One can reveal nested dyadic cells
$Q_0\supset Q_1\supset\cdots\supset Q_t$ containing $Z$, where $Q_i$
is a finite-valued measurable function of $Z$, the preceding revelations,
and $W_1,\ldots,W_i$, so that the augmented transcript
\[
 \Pi_t=(W_1,Q_1,\ldots,W_t,Q_t)
\]
satisfies
\begin{equation}
 I(Z;\Pi_t)\le Cdt.
\end{equation}
Here $C$ is a constant depending only on $C_0$. If $J_t$ is the level of $Q_t$, the
construction also gives $\E J_t\le Ct$.
Theorem (Precision lower bound from likelihood truncation)

Let M(d)=o(d^2) be a nonnegative integer-valued memory bound, and let 0<\epsilon(d)\le1/10. Suppose a family of learners in the model above satisfies

\mathbb P\!\left\{\arccos\langle\widehat s,s\rangle \le\epsilon(d)\right\}\ge\frac23 \qquad\text{for every }s\in S^{d-1}.

There is an absolute c>0 such that, for all sufficiently large d,

T(d)\ge c\,d\log_2\frac1{\epsilon(d)}.

The eventual dimension threshold may depend on the memory sequence.

Section 7, Likelihood truncation and selected dyadic cells Read it in the paper TeX source, line 34
Show the TeX
Let $M(d)=o(d^2)$ be a nonnegative integer-valued memory bound, and let
$0<\epsilon(d)\le1/10$.  Suppose a family of learners in the model
above satisfies
\[
 \mathbb P\!\left\{\arccos\langle\widehat s,s\rangle
              \le\epsilon(d)\right\}\ge\frac23
 \qquad\text{for every }s\in S^{d-1}.
\]
There is an absolute $c>0$ such that, for all sufficiently large $d$,
\[
 T(d)\ge c\,d\log_2\frac1{\epsilon(d)}.
\]
The eventual dimension threshold may depend on the memory sequence.
Theorem (The sample bound by separated-tuple localization)

Let M(d)=o(d^2) be integer-valued and let 0<\epsilon(d)\le1/10. Every learner of Section l:model with uniform-sphere angular success probability at least 2/3 must satisfy

T(d)\ge c\,d\log(1/\epsilon(d))

for all sufficiently large d, with an absolute c>0. The eventual dimension threshold may depend on the memory sequence. Success at least 2/3 for every fixed signal implies the same conclusion by averaging.

Section 10, Localization by separated tuples Read it in the paper TeX source, line 727
Show the TeX
Let \(M(d)=o(d^2)\) be integer-valued and let
\(0<\epsilon(d)\le1/10\).  Every learner of
Section~\ref{l:model} with uniform-sphere angular success probability
at least \(2/3\) must satisfy
\[
 T(d)\ge c\,d\log(1/\epsilon(d))
\]
for all sufficiently large \(d\), with an absolute \(c>0\).
The eventual dimension threshold may depend on the memory sequence.
Success at least \(2/3\) for every fixed signal implies the same
conclusion by averaging.

Projection moments, positive cap domination, and Riesz estimates on the sphere

Theorem (Finite-memory precision bound)

Let M(d)=o(d^2) be a sequence of nonnegative integers and let 0<\epsilon(d)\le1/10. There is an absolute c>0 such that, for all sufficiently large d, every learner in the experiment above whose uniform-sphere average success satisfies

\Prob\{\arccos\inner{\widehat S}{S}\le\epsilon(d)\}\ge\frac23

must use

T(d)\ge c\,d\log\frac1{\epsilon(d)}.

The dimension threshold may depend on the memory sequence. In particular, the conclusion holds when the same success probability is required separately for every s\in S^{d-1}.

Section 2, Spherical probabilities and exact observations Read it in the paper TeX source, line 175
Show the TeX
Let \(M(d)=o(d^2)\) be a sequence of nonnegative integers and let
\(0<\epsilon(d)\le1/10\). There is an absolute \(c>0\) such that, for
all sufficiently large \(d\), every learner in the experiment above whose
uniform-sphere average success satisfies
\[
 \Prob\{\arccos\inner{\widehat S}{S}\le\epsilon(d)\}\ge\frac23
\]
must use
\[
 T(d)\ge c\,d\log\frac1{\epsilon(d)}.
\]
The dimension threshold may depend on the memory sequence. In particular,
the conclusion holds when the same success probability is required
separately for every \(s\in S^{d-1}\).
Theorem (Integrated orthonormal-projection moment)

Let d,k,q be integers and \beta a real number with k\ge1, q\ge2, and

k+q\le d,\qquad 0<\beta\le d,\qquad \beta-k-(q-2)\ge1.

Let \nu be a finite positive Borel measure supported in B(z,R), R>0, satisfying (p:all-ball-mass) for some K\ge0. Assume that P_\#\nu is absolutely continuous with respect to Lebesgue measure for \vartheta_{d,k}-almost every P. There is a jointly measurable version g(P,u) of its density such that

\left(\int_{\mathcal V_{d,k}}\int_{\R^k}g(P,u)^q\,du\, d\vartheta_{d,k}(P)\right)^{1/q} \le C^d(C\sqrt d)^{k(1-1/q)} K R^{\beta-k(1-1/q)}.

For every P, this version vanishes when \norm{u-Pz}>R.

Section 3, Integrated moments of orthonormal projections Read it in the paper TeX source, line 168
Show the TeX
Let \(d,k,q\) be integers and \(\beta\) a real number with
\(k\ge1\), \(q\ge2\), and
\begin{equation}
 k+q\le d,\qquad 0<\beta\le d,\qquad
 \beta-k-(q-2)\ge1.
\end{equation}
Let \(\nu\) be a finite positive Borel measure supported in
\(B(z,R)\), \(R>0\), satisfying \eqref{p:all-ball-mass} for some
\(K\ge0\). Assume that \(P_\#\nu\) is absolutely continuous with
respect to Lebesgue measure for \(\vartheta_{d,k}\)-almost every \(P\).
There is a jointly measurable version \(g(P,u)\) of its density such that
\begin{equation}
 \left(\int_{\mathcal V_{d,k}}\int_{\R^k}g(P,u)^q\,du\,
 d\vartheta_{d,k}(P)\right)^{1/q}
 \le C^d(C\sqrt d)^{k(1-1/q)}
 K R^{\beta-k(1-1/q)}.
\end{equation}
For every \(P\), this version vanishes when \(\norm{u-Pz}>R\).
Theorem (Normalized moment for unit-ball measures)

For sufficiently large d, put

k=p=\lfloor d/16\rfloor,\qquad \lambda=(d-1)/2.

Let X be a k-by-d standard Gaussian matrix and define

H=(XX^{\mathsf T})^{1/2},\qquad P=H^{-1}X

on its probability-one full-row-rank event, and set P to a fixed frame on the null complement. Let m_k be uniform probability on the unit ball of \R^k. Suppose \nu is a finite positive Borel measure fixed independently of X, of mass at most one, supported in the unit ball of \R^d, such that for a fixed D>0,

\nu(B(b,t))\le D^d t^\lambda \qquad(b\in\R^d,\ t>0).

Assume P_\#\nu is absolutely continuous for almost every X. There is a jointly measurable nonnegative g_X(z) such that, for almost every X, P_\#\nu(dz)=g_X(z)\,dz/v_k. This version vanishes when \norm z>1 and satisfies

\E_X\int g_X(z)^p\,dm_k(z)\le \exp(C_Ddp).
Section 3, Integrated moments of orthonormal projections Read it in the paper TeX source, line 288
Show the TeX
For sufficiently large \(d\), put
\[
 k=p=\lfloor d/16\rfloor,\qquad \lambda=(d-1)/2.
\]
Let \(X\) be a \(k\)-by-\(d\) standard Gaussian matrix and define
\[
 H=(XX^{\mathsf T})^{1/2},\qquad P=H^{-1}X
\]
on its probability-one full-row-rank event, and set \(P\) to a fixed frame
on the null complement. Let \(m_k\) be uniform
probability on the unit ball of \(\R^k\). Suppose \(\nu\) is a finite
positive Borel measure fixed independently of \(X\), of mass at most one, supported in the unit ball
of \(\R^d\), such that for a fixed \(D>0\),
\[
 \nu(B(b,t))\le D^d t^\lambda
 \qquad(b\in\R^d,\ t>0).
\]
Assume \(P_\#\nu\) is absolutely continuous for almost every \(X\).
There is a jointly measurable nonnegative \(g_X(z)\) such that, for almost
every \(X\), \(P_\#\nu(dz)=g_X(z)\,dz/v_k\). This version vanishes when
\(\norm z>1\) and satisfies
\begin{equation}
 \E_X\int g_X(z)^p\,dm_k(z)\le \exp(C_Ddp).
\end{equation}

Replacing Gaussian observations in memory-constrained inference

Theorem (Mixed projection moment and exact density version)

Let n=d-1, let m,r,q\ge1 be integers, and put \ell=m+r. Suppose

\ell<n,\qquad \ell-m-(q-1)\ge1.

Let \rho be a finite nonnegative Borel measure on S^{d-1}. Suppose that B,D>0 and, for every z\in\R^d and t>0,

\rho(B(z,t))\le Bt^\ell,\qquad \rho(B(z,t))\le Dt^n.

Let X\sim\gamma_m and Z\sim\gamma_r be independent, and set G=(X;Z). For \delta>0, define the cube average

p_{\rho,\delta}(g,y) =(2\delta)^{-\ell}\int \ind_{\{\norm{gu-y}_\infty\le\delta\}}\,d\rho(u).

There is an absolute C such that, for every fixed s\in S^{d-1} and every \delta>0,

\left[\E_X \left(\E_Z p_{\rho,\delta}((X;Z),(X;Z)s)\right)^q \right]^{1/q} \le e^{Cd}B\bigl(1+\log^+(D/B)\bigr).

If in addition \rho\ll\sigma, use the jointly Borel density p_\rho in (eq:r-density-version). There is a measurable set E_\rho\subset S^{d-1}, with \rho(E_\rho)=0, such that for every s\notin E_\rho the cube averages converge to p_\rho(G,Gs) for \gamma_\ell-almost every G, and

\left[\E_X \left(\E_Zp_\rho((X;Z),(X;Z)s)\right)^q \right]^{1/q} \le e^{Cd}B\bigl(1+\log^+(D/B)\bigr).

When \rho\ne0, E_\rho may also be chosen so that 0<p_\rho(G,Gs)<\infty for \gamma_\ell-almost every G and every s\notin E_\rho.

Section 3, A projection moment with shared and fresh rows Read it in the paper TeX source, line 23
Show the TeX
Let \(n=d-1\), let \(m,r,q\ge1\) be integers, and put
\(\ell=m+r\).  Suppose
\begin{equation}
 \ell<n,\qquad \ell-m-(q-1)\ge1.
\end{equation}
Let \(\rho\) be a finite nonnegative Borel measure on \(S^{d-1}\).
Suppose that \(B,D>0\) and, for every \(z\in\R^d\) and \(t>0\),
\begin{equation}
 \rho(B(z,t))\le Bt^\ell,\qquad
 \rho(B(z,t))\le Dt^n.
\end{equation}
Let \(X\sim\gamma_m\) and \(Z\sim\gamma_r\) be independent, and set
\(G=(X;Z)\).  For \(\delta>0\), define the cube average
\[
 p_{\rho,\delta}(g,y)
   =(2\delta)^{-\ell}\int
       \ind_{\{\norm{gu-y}_\infty\le\delta\}}\,d\rho(u).
\]
There is an absolute \(C\) such that, for every fixed
\(s\in S^{d-1}\) and every \(\delta>0\),
\begin{equation}
 \left[\E_X
       \left(\E_Z p_{\rho,\delta}((X;Z),(X;Z)s)\right)^q
 \right]^{1/q}
 \le e^{Cd}B\bigl(1+\log^+(D/B)\bigr).
\end{equation}

If in addition \(\rho\ll\sigma\), use the jointly Borel density
\(p_\rho\) in \eqref{eq:r-density-version}.  There is a measurable
set \(E_\rho\subset S^{d-1}\), with \(\rho(E_\rho)=0\), such that
for every \(s\notin E_\rho\) the cube averages converge to
\(p_\rho(G,Gs)\) for \(\gamma_\ell\)-almost every \(G\), and
\begin{equation}
 \left[\E_X
       \left(\E_Zp_\rho((X;Z),(X;Z)s)\right)^q
 \right]^{1/q}
 \le e^{Cd}B\bigl(1+\log^+(D/B)\bigr).
\end{equation}
When \(\rho\ne0\), \(E_\rho\) may also be chosen so that
\(0<p_\rho(G,Gs)<\infty\) for \(\gamma_\ell\)-almost every \(G\)
and every \(s\notin E_\rho\).
Theorem (Critical-radius comparison)

In the two experiments of Subsection subsec:r-two-experiments, use the dimensions (eq:r-critical-parameters). Thus S\sim\sigma, A\sim\gamma_m is independent of S, and W is countable with an arbitrary joint dependence on (S,A). The aligned law retains (S,A,W) and appends independent r-row C, whereas the independent law retains (S,W) and draws an independent \ell-row matrix G. If H(W)\le d^2, then, for an absolute constant K,

I_0(S;W\mid G,GS)\le I_1(S;W\mid G,GS)+Kd.
Section 4, A critical radius makes the density terms cancel Read it in the paper TeX source, line 22
Show the TeX
In the two experiments of Subsection~\ref{subsec:r-two-experiments},
use the dimensions \eqref{eq:r-critical-parameters}.  Thus
\(S\sim\sigma\), \(A\sim\gamma_m\) is independent of \(S\), and
\(W\) is countable with an arbitrary joint dependence on \((S,A)\).
The aligned law retains \((S,A,W)\) and appends independent
\(r\)-row \(C\), whereas the independent law retains \((S,W)\)
and draws an independent \(\ell\)-row matrix \(G\).
If \(H(W)\le d^2\), then, for an absolute constant \(K\),
\begin{equation}
 I_0(S;W\mid G,GS)\le I_1(S;W\mid G,GS)+Kd.
\end{equation}
Theorem (Streaming consequence of the critical radius)

Let M(d) be a nonnegative integer sequence with M(d)=o(d^2), and let 0<\epsilon(d)\le1/10. For each d, consider a learner in Definition def:r-streaming-model with deterministic finite horizon T(d). If its uniform-sphere angular success probability, including all learner randomness, is at least 3/5, then

T(d)\ge c\,d\log\frac1{\epsilon(d)}

for an absolute c>0 and all sufficiently large d. The eventual dimension threshold may depend on the memory sequence.

Section 8, From row comparisons to streaming lower bounds Read it in the paper TeX source, line 284
Show the TeX
Let \(M(d)\) be a nonnegative integer sequence with \(M(d)=o(d^2)\),
and let \(0<\epsilon(d)\le1/10\).  For each \(d\), consider a learner
in Definition~\ref{def:r-streaming-model} with deterministic finite
horizon \(T(d)\).  If its uniform-sphere angular success probability,
including all learner randomness, is at least \(3/5\), then
\[
 T(d)\ge c\,d\log\frac1{\epsilon(d)}
\]
for an absolute \(c>0\) and all sufficiently large \(d\).  The
eventual dimension threshold may depend on the memory sequence.

Subsphere methods for memory-sample lower bounds in noiseless Gaussian regression

Theorem (Explicit noiseless precision bound)

Let M:\mathbb N\to\mathbb Z_{\ge0} satisfy M(d)=o(d^2). There is a dimension threshold depending only on this memory sequence such that, for every larger d, every 0<\epsilon\le1/10, and every learner in Definition s:model, the following implication holds. If S is uniform on S^{d-1}, independently of the Gaussian rows and learner randomness, and

\Prob\{\arccos\ip{\widehat s}{S}\le\epsilon\}\ge\frac23,

then

T\ge 2^{-16}d\log_2(1/\epsilon).
Section 1, Introduction Read it in the paper TeX source, line 53
Show the TeX
Let \(M:\mathbb N\to\mathbb Z_{\ge0}\) satisfy \(M(d)=o(d^2)\).
There is a dimension threshold depending only on this memory sequence
such that, for every larger \(d\), every \(0<\epsilon\le1/10\), and
every learner in Definition~\ref{s:model}, the following implication
holds. If \(S\) is uniform on \(S^{d-1}\), independently of the
Gaussian rows and learner randomness, and
\[
 \Prob\{\arccos\ip{\widehat s}{S}\le\epsilon\}\ge\frac23,
\]
then
\begin{equation}
 T\ge 2^{-16}d\log_2(1/\epsilon).
\end{equation}
Corollary (Guarantees for every signal)

Under the memory assumption of Theorem s:main, suppose a learner satisfies

\Prob_s\{\arccos\ip{\widehat s}{s}\le\epsilon\}\ge\frac23 \qquad\text{for every }s\in S^{d-1},

where \Prob_s averages its observations and randomness at the fixed signal s. Then (s:main-bound) holds at the same dimension threshold.

Section 1, Introduction Read it in the paper TeX source, line 69
Show the TeX
Under the memory assumption of Theorem~\ref{s:main}, suppose a learner
satisfies
\[
 \Prob_s\{\arccos\ip{\widehat s}{s}\le\epsilon\}\ge\frac23
 \qquad\text{for every }s\in S^{d-1},
\]
where \(\Prob_s\) averages its observations and randomness at the fixed
signal \(s\). Then \eqref{s:main-bound} holds at the same dimension
threshold.
Configuration and file facts
OpenAI’s Lean catalogue
OpenAI’s Lean catalogue does not list this as a main result; the release’s Lean notes for family 140 link it.
Solution module
OAI.Probability.Localization.Main
Allowed axioms
propext, Classical.choice, Quot.soundThe axioms this configuration allows a proof to use. A replay shows which of them a proof uses.
Imports
Mathlib
Imports from outside Mathlib
None
Local vocabulary
50 local vocabulary declarations
Lines of Lean, without comments or blank lines
144
Second proof-verification program (nanoda)
Off in OpenAI's configuration.

Statement comparison

A shareable summary of this page: the proposed paper match, what the Lean statement expresses, and which reviews are recorded.

Plectis Atlas

Finite-entropy localization and regularization bounds

Family 140: Memory–sample lower bounds for noiseless Gaussian regression

No paper statement selected

no paper statement matches the Lean text clearly enough to pair, so the closest candidates are listed below.

The Lean statement says

def FiniteEntropyStatement : Prop :=  ∃ n₀ : ℕ, ∀ n : ℕ, n₀ ≤ n → ∀ Q : Cell n, ∀ P : Measure (Coordinate n),    IsProbabilityMeasure P → P ≪ uniformCell Q → InformationTheory.klDiv P (uniformCell Q) ≠ ∞ →      (∀ᵐ z ∂P, Terminates P Q z) ∧ Measurable (terminalLog P Q) ∧      (∀ h : Log n, P {z | terminalLog P Q z = h} ≠ 0 →        Descendant Q (terminalCell P Q h) ∧ Regular (terminalLaw P Q h) (terminalCell P Q h)) ∧      Integrable (fun z => (depth P Q z : ℝ)) P ∧      Integrable (fun z => (attempts P Q z : ℝ)) P ∧      (∫ z,(attempts P Q z : ℝ) ∂P) ≤ 2*(1+∫ z,(depth P Q z : ℝ) ∂P) ∧      (∫⁻ z,InformationTheory.klDiv (terminalLaw P Q (terminalLog P Q z))          (uniformCell (terminalCell P Q (terminalLog P Q z))) ∂P) +        ENNReal.ofReal ((Real.log 2/4)*n*(∫ z,(depth P Q z : ℝ) ∂P)) ≤          InformationTheory.klDiv P (uniformCell Q) + ENNReal.ofReal (2/Real.exp 1)theorem finite_expected_regularization : FiniteEntropyStatement := by  sorry

A Lean statement states the theorem and leaves its proof as sorry on purpose. OpenAI’s proof is in a separate solution module, and a program called Comparator checks that proof against this statement.

No paper theorem is paired with this Lean statement.three independent groups report that Comparator accepted runs for this file at the release version shown here.Statement review: none recorded

50 local vocabulary declarationsAllowed axioms: propext, Classical.choice, Quot.soundopenai/math at fd4aeebwcook04.github.io/plectis-atlas/statements/GaussianFiniteEntropy.html

Recorded comparisons with the paper

Atlas records no contributed comparison of this statement with the paper.

Contributed Comparator run reports

Atlas records no contributed report of running Comparator for this statement file.

Compare this statement with the paperShare a Comparator run reportSuggest a change