Plectis Atlas
Search

↑ and ↓ move, Enter opens, Esc closes.

Lean statement

Exact asymptotic moduli and a Daugavet example

Lean is a language for mathematical statements and proofs that a computer can verify. This page shows one statement file from OpenAI’s release, possible paper matches and independent reports. The code-like names below identify the definitions or theorems selected by the proof-verification settings.

Theorems selected for verification: OAI.ExactModuli.exact_main OAI.ExactModuli.kadets_werner_existence OAI.ExactModuli.exact_example

Lean statement file: DaugavetModuli.leanShow on the mapFamily 331. OpenAI lists this as a main result in its Lean catalogue.

The Lean statement

The lines of the Lean statement that state the theorem, then the definitions in the file that it uses.

theorem exact_main {Ω : Type u_1} [MeasurableSpace Ω] (μ : Measure Ω)    [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] (E : Submodule ℝ (Lp ℝ 1 μ))    (_hclosed : IsClosed (E : Set (Lp ℝ 1 μ))) (hdim : ¬ FiniteDimensional ℝ E)    (hprecompact : MeasurePrecompactBall μ E) (hdaugavet : Daugavet E) :    (∀ (x : E), ‖x‖ = 1 → ∀ t : ℝ, 0 < t →      H (normSeminorm ℝ E) x t = max (t / 2) (t - 1) ∧      D (normSeminorm ℝ E) x t = max 0 (t - 2)) ∧    (∀ t : ℝ, 0 < t →      averagedModulus (normSeminorm ℝ E) t = max (t / 2) (t - 1) ∧      oneSidedModulus (normSeminorm ℝ E) t = max 0 (t - 2)) ∧    (∀ N : Seminorm ℝ E, EquivalentNorm N → ¬ AUC N) := by  sorrytheorem kadets_werner_existence :    ∃ E : Submodule ℝ (Lp ℝ 1 kwMeasure),      IsClosed (E : Set (Lp ℝ 1 kwMeasure)) ∧ (¬ FiniteDimensional ℝ E) ∧      MeasurePrecompactBall kwMeasure E ∧ UnitSliceProperty E ∧ Daugavet E := by  sorrytheorem exact_example :    ∃ E : Submodule ℝ (Lp ℝ 1 kwMeasure),      IsClosed (E : Set (Lp ℝ 1 kwMeasure)) ∧ (¬ FiniteDimensional ℝ E) ∧      MeasurePrecompactBall kwMeasure E ∧ UnitSliceProperty E ∧ Daugavet E ∧      (∀ (x : E), ‖x‖ = 1 → ∀ t : ℝ, 0 < t →        H (normSeminorm ℝ E) x t = max (t / 2) (t - 1) ∧        D (normSeminorm ℝ E) x t = max 0 (t - 2)) ∧      (∀ t : ℝ, 0 < t →        averagedModulus (normSeminorm ℝ E) t = max (t / 2) (t - 1) ∧        oneSidedModulus (normSeminorm ℝ E) t = max 0 (t - 2)) ∧      (∀ N : Seminorm ℝ E, EquivalentNorm N → ¬ AUC N) := by  sorry

A Lean statement states the theorem and leaves its proof as sorry on purpose. OpenAI’s proof is in a separate solution module, and a program called Comparator checks that proof against this statement.

Definitions needed to read it

Local definitions the statement names, followed through the definitions they name in turn. The match is by name in the source text, so a name reached only through notation can be missed; the full file is below.

  • definition OAI.ExactModuli.Cofinite line 17

    def Cofinite (F : Submodule ℝ X) : Prop :=  IsClosed (F : Set X) ∧ FiniteDimensional ℝ (X ⧸ F)
  • definition OAI.ExactModuli.averagedIncrement line 21

    def averagedIncrement (N : Seminorm ℝ X) (x : X) (t : ℝ) (y : X) : ℝ :=  (N (x + t • y) + N (x - t • y)) / 2 - 1
  • definition OAI.ExactModuli.H line 24

    def H (N : Seminorm ℝ X) (x : X) (t : ℝ) : ℝ :=  sSup {r | ∃ F : Submodule ℝ X, Cofinite F ∧    r = sInf {a | ∃ y ∈ F, 1 ≤ N y ∧ a = averagedIncrement N x t y}}
  • definition OAI.ExactModuli.D line 28

    def D (N : Seminorm ℝ X) (x : X) (t : ℝ) : ℝ :=  sSup {r | ∃ F : Submodule ℝ X, Cofinite F ∧    r = sInf {a | ∃ y ∈ F, N y = 1 ∧ a = N (x + t • y) - 1}}
  • definition OAI.ExactModuli.averagedModulus line 32

    def averagedModulus (N : Seminorm ℝ X) (t : ℝ) : ℝ :=  sInf {r | ∃ x, N x = 1 ∧ r = H N x t}
  • definition OAI.ExactModuli.oneSidedModulus line 35

    def oneSidedModulus (N : Seminorm ℝ X) (t : ℝ) : ℝ :=  sInf {r | ∃ x, N x = 1 ∧ r = D N x t}
  • definition OAI.ExactModuli.EquivalentNorm line 39

    def EquivalentNorm (N : Seminorm ℝ X) : Prop :=  ∃ a b : ℝ, 0 < a ∧ 0 < b ∧ ∀ x, a * ‖x‖ ≤ N x ∧ N x ≤ b * ‖x‖
  • definition OAI.ExactModuli.AUC line 42

    def AUC (N : Seminorm ℝ X) : Prop :=  ∀ t : ℝ, 0 < t → 0 < oneSidedModulus N t
  • definition OAI.ExactModuli.Daugavet line 46

    def Daugavet (X : Type uX) [NormedAddCommGroup X] [NormedSpace ℝ X] : Prop :=  ∀ (ell : X →L[ℝ] ℝ) (v : X),    ‖ContinuousLinearMap.id ℝ X + ell.smulRight v‖ = 1 + ‖ell.smulRight v‖
  • definition OAI.ExactModuli.measureDistance line 53

    def measureDistance (f g : Lp ℝ 1 μ) : ℝ :=  sInf {a : ℝ | 0 < a ∧ μ.real {ω | a < |f ω - g ω|} < a}
  • definition OAI.ExactModuli.MeasurePrecompactBall line 57

    def MeasurePrecompactBall (E : Submodule ℝ (Lp ℝ 1 μ)) : Prop :=  ∀ ε : ℝ, 0 < ε → ∃ s : Finset (Lp ℝ 1 μ),    ∀ y : E, ‖y‖ ≤ 1 → ∃ b ∈ s, measureDistance μ (y : Lp ℝ 1 μ) b < ε
  • definition OAI.ExactModuli.UnitSliceProperty line 62

    def UnitSliceProperty (X : Type uX) [NormedAddCommGroup X] [NormedSpace ℝ X] : Prop :=  ∀ (w : X), ‖w‖ = 1 → ∀ (ell : X →L[ℝ] ℝ) (α : ℝ),    (∃ u : X, ‖u‖ ≤ 1 ∧ α < ell u) →    ∀ ρ : ℝ, 0 < ρ → ∃ y : X, ‖y‖ = 1 ∧ α < ell y ∧ 2 - ρ ≤ ‖w + y‖
  • abbreviation OAI.ExactModuli.KWOmega line 68

    abbrev KWOmega := ℕ → unitInterval
  • definition OAI.ExactModuli.kwMeasure line 70

    def kwMeasure : Measure KWOmega := Measure.infinitePi (fun _ : ℕ => (volume : Measure unitInterval))

Possible paper match, with no recorded review

Atlas selected this possible match by comparing words in the Lean statement with every statement in the family. No review of whether the statements mean the same thing is recorded.

Words of the Lean statement, its names split into words, that also appear in the theorem: convergence, t/2, probability, daugavet, omega, measure, property, ball and eleven more. Shared only with the release’s name for the Lean statement or OpenAI’s note on it: formulas.

Statements in Exact asymptotic moduli in a Daugavet subspace of L1 come first because the release’s name for this Lean statement shares words with that paper’s title.

Theorem 1.1 of Exact asymptotic moduli in a Daugavet subspace of L1

Theorem

Let E be an infinite-dimensional closed real subspace of L^1(\Omega,\mathbb P), where \mathbb P is a probability measure. Suppose its closed unit ball is totally bounded for convergence in measure and its inherited norm has the Daugavet property. Then every x\in S_E and t>0 satisfy

H_E(x,t)=\max\{t/2,t-1\},\qquad D_E(x,t)=\max\{0,t-2\}.

Consequently these are also the formulas for \widehat\delta_E(t) and \overline\delta_E(t). The space E admits no equivalent AUC norm.

Section 1, Introduction Read it in the paper TeX source, line 63
Show the TeX
Let $E$ be an infinite-dimensional closed real subspace of
$L^1(\Omega,\mathbb P)$, where $\mathbb P$ is a probability measure.
Suppose its closed unit ball is totally bounded for convergence in
measure and its inherited norm has the Daugavet property.  Then every
$x\in S_E$ and $t>0$ satisfy
\[
 H_E(x,t)=\max\{t/2,t-1\},\qquad
 D_E(x,t)=\max\{0,t-2\}.
\]
Consequently these are also the formulas for
$\widehat\delta_E(t)$ and $\overline\delta_E(t)$.  The space $E$ admits
no equivalent AUC norm.

Other possible paper matches, closest wording first

  • Theorem 6.1 of Exact asymptotic moduli in a Daugavet subspace of L1. Words of the Lean statement, its names split into words, that also appear in the theorem: slice, werner, kadets, daugavet, nonempty, property and seven more.
  • Corollary 17.2 of Midpoint lenses in segment spaces. Words of the Lean statement, its names split into words, that also appear in the theorem: cofinite, direction, averaged, least, omega, modulus and two more. Shared only with the release’s name for the Lean statement or OpenAI’s note on it: infimum and asymptotic.
  • Proposition 9.1 of Midpoint lenses in segment spaces. Words of the Lean statement, its names split into words, that also appear in the theorem: sided, increments, modulus, auc, unit, equivalent and four more. Shared only with the release’s name for the Lean statement or OpenAI’s note on it: asymptotic.
  • Theorem 7.12 of Distortion of countably branching diamonds from midpoint and tree energies. Words of the Lean statement, its names split into words, that also appear in the theorem: linear, modulus, subspaces, equivalent, closed, max and four more. Shared only with the release’s name for the Lean statement or OpenAI’s note on it: convexity, uniformly, asymptotically, convex and midpoint.
  • Theorem 1.1 of Asymptotic midpoint uniform convexity and unbounded diamond distortion in a reflexive tree space. Words of the Lean statement, its names split into words, that also appear in the theorem: least, integer, auc, dimensional, equivalent, infinite and two more.
  • Proposition 8.4 of Midpoint lenses in segment spaces. Words of the Lean statement, its names split into words, that also appear in the theorem: continuous, natural, integer, dimensional, contains, real and five more. Shared only with the release’s name for the Lean statement or OpenAI’s note on it: positive, uniformly, asymptotically and convex.

How Atlas selects possible matches: it compares words in the Lean statement with every statement in the family. It also splits Lean names into words. The release’s label and note receive less weight; a main theorem wins a close match. If the Lean wording yields no clear match, Atlas uses the catalogue description. This selects passages to compare; it does not establish that they mean the same thing.

Reported Comparator runs

three independent groups report that Comparator accepted runs for this Lean statement file: Carlos Toledo’s cert-machine; MathVet; Neal McBurnett’s openai-math-lean-tooling. Each group reports its own Comparator run for this statement file. Atlas has not repeated the runs.

For a configured theorem, Comparator tests whether OpenAI’s proof proves the exact Lean statement. Some files instead configure definitions for comparison by name and type. Acceptance does not establish that the statement means the same thing as the paper’s theorem.

Carlos Toledo’s cert-machine

How they ran it, in their words

Every Comparator challenge re-run on Linux with nanoda switched on, decided by a preregistered rule; every family’s challenge statements read against OpenAI’s headline, clause by clause. Decider: Comparator (leanprover/comparator d03acab1 = tag v4.34.0, built with the release’s toolchain v4.34.1), lean4export 076e8e57, landrun 811cfff5, nanoda_lib 3a240721 — on GitHub’s Linux runners (.github/workflows/openai-math-kernel.yml), one j…

  • Accepted Their term: “CERTIFIED”.

    Re-run through Comparator with the independent nanoda kernel switched on: Lean’s kernel and nanoda both accept OpenAI’s solution.

    Reported 10 October 2026, at the release version shown here. Original verification report

MathVet

How they ran it, in their words

An independent, model-assisted, pre-referee reading of each family’s challenge statements against its headline claim under a published rubric (PROTOCOL.md), with its own Comparator runs per challenge. Its protocol describes a planned error-rate study; this import does not establish that the study has been completed.

  • Accepted Their term: “comparator-sandboxed-pass”.

    Re-run through Comparator in a sandboxed virtual machine: accepted.

    Reported 8 October 2026, at the release version shown here. Original verification report

Neal McBurnett’s openai-math-lean-tooling

How they ran it, in their words

Each challenge’s solution is built and checked by Comparator at the pinned release, on Lean leanprover/lean4:v4.34.1, recording the verdict, the check time and the peak memory; the run was still in progress at this snapshot (192 accepted, 224 pending).

  • Accepted Their term: “accepted”.

    Re-run through Comparator with Lean’s kernel: accepted (the check took 401 s; peak memory 6.3 GiB).

    Reported 10 October 2026, at the release version shown here. Original verification report

What an accepted Comparator run would establish

If Comparator is run under this configuration and accepts, the solution proves the configured theorem using only the allowed axioms, and the Lean kernel accepts every step.

This configuration lists no definition holes, so every definition the statement uses is compared as it is written in this file.

Allowed axioms: propext, Quot.sound, Classical.choice

Acceptance leaves open whether the Lean statement means the same thing as the paper’s theorem, whether the paper’s other claims are correct, and whether the result is new. Those questions require comparing the definitions and statements, reviewing the paper’s arguments, and reading the earlier literature.

Do family 331’s Lean statements express the advertised result?

These assessments compare all the family’s Lean statements with the whole result OpenAI describes in its catalogue. They do not assess this statement alone. Each group uses its own published rules.

MathVet and cert-machine agree on how much of the advertised result the Lean statements express.

  • MathVet

    Finds the whole advertised result stated or implied Their term: “full”.

    The challenge statements imply the headline claim after unpacking definitions or one routine step. Their record

    Their note: ForestSpace.main_theorem (unconditional) states for FullDual Vertex (continuous dual of the completed disjoint-segment-norm space over a forest): infinite-dimensional, separable, canonically reflexive, no equivalent norm is AUC, averaged midpoint modulus ≥ √(1+t²/12) - 1 for all t > 0 (this implies positivity of the usual max-version midpoint modulus, since max ≥ average: the one routine step), and every embedding of the depth-k countably branching diamond has distortion ≥ √(1+k/12). The other six challenges are companion results of the seven papers (lens tail bound, all-pairs diamond bound 1+k/4 ≤ D², exact Daugavet-subspace moduli, tree-potential, independent-product and recursive-potential spaces), not needed for the headline.

    Definitions the group asks readers to compare with the paper: aucModulus, averageModulus and Cofinite are hand-built (inf_{N x=1} sup_{F cofinite closed} inf_{y∈F, N y=1} (N(x+ty)-1), resp. with the average of N(x±ty) minus 1), matching the standard asymptotic moduli; IsAUC N := ∀ t > 0, 0 < aucModulus N t and EquivalentNorm as a seminorm with α‖x‖ ≤ N x ≤ β‖x‖ ; Diamond.diamond k := base.iterate k (each edge replaced by ℕ-many 2-edge paths, graph distance via SimpleGraph.dist) and EmbeddingBound (∃ scale s > 0, s·d ≤ ‖f u - f v‖ ≤ C·s·d): standard distortion; docs note 22 companion inputs are assumed in some graph deductions, not in the headline theorem

  • Carlos Toledo’s cert-machine

    Finds the whole advertised result stated or implied Their term: “MATCHES”.

    The challenge statements state the headline as OpenAI wrote it. Their record

Read the complete assessments on the family page.

OpenAI’s own note on what this Lean statement covers

“The paper exhibits a real $L_1$ subspace with positive averaged midpoint convexity but no equivalent asymptotically uniformly convex norm. For every closed infinite-dimensional subspace whose unit ball is precompact in measure and which has the Daugavet property, the formalization computes the moduli at every unit vector: the averaged midpoint modulus is $\max(t/2,t-1)$ and the usual one-sided asymptotic modulus is $\max(0,t-2)$ for every $t>0$. The same formulas hold after taking the infimum over unit vectors, and every equivalent norm fails asymptotic uniform convexity.”

An AI agent drafted an interpretation of that note, classifying this statement as “states a paper’s theorem as the paper does”. No human review of the draft is recorded.

Supporting material

The complete Lean statement file

108 lines, copied from release version fd4aeeb. A name defined in this file links to its line; pointing at the name shows its definition.

Declared in this fileOpenAI’s library at fd4aeebOther linked names open the current documentation for Mathlib, Lean’s mathematical library.

Links in the file: 34 to its own declarations, 80 to Mathlib’s documentation. 17 declared names also link to the same declaration in OpenAI’s library. OpenAI uses Mathlib version d13f23b. The linked documentation describes the current version, so names that have since changed may be missing there.

import Mathlibnamespace OAInoncomputable sectionopen MeasureTheory Filter Setopen scoped ENNReal NNReal Topologyuniverse uX u_1namespace ExactModulivariable {X : Type uX} [NormedAddCommGroup X] [NormedSpace ℝ X]/-- Closed linear subspaces of finite codimension. -/def Cofinite (F : Submodule ℝ X) : Prop :=  IsClosed (F : Set X) ∧ FiniteDimensional ℝ (X ⧸ F)/-- Averaged increment for directions of norm at least one. -/def averagedIncrement (N : Seminorm ℝ X) (x : X) (t : ℝ) (y : X) : ℝ :=  (N (x + t • y) + N (x - t • y)) / 2 - 1def H (N : Seminorm ℝ X) (x : X) (t : ℝ) : ℝ :=  sSup {r | ∃ F : Submodule ℝ X, Cofinite F ∧    r = sInf {a | ∃ y ∈ F, 1 ≤ N y ∧ a = averagedIncrement N x t y}}def D (N : Seminorm ℝ X) (x : X) (t : ℝ) : ℝ :=  sSup {r | ∃ F : Submodule ℝ X, Cofinite F ∧    r = sInf {a | ∃ y ∈ F, N y = 1 ∧ a = N (x + t • y) - 1}}def averagedModulus (N : Seminorm ℝ X) (t : ℝ) : ℝ :=  sInf {r | ∃ x, N x = 1 ∧ r = H N x t}def oneSidedModulus (N : Seminorm ℝ X) (t : ℝ) : ℝ :=  sInf {r | ∃ x, N x = 1 ∧ r = D N x t}/-- Two-sided comparison makes this seminorm a genuine norm equivalent to the original. -/def EquivalentNorm (N : Seminorm ℝ X) : Prop :=  ∃ a b : ℝ, 0 < a ∧ 0 < b ∧ ∀ x, a * ‖x‖ ≤ N x ∧ N x ≤ b * ‖x‖def AUC (N : Seminorm ℝ X) : Prop :=  ∀ t : ℝ, 0 < t → 0 < oneSidedModulus N t/-- Every rank-one operator has the form `ell.smulRight v`. -/def Daugavet (X : Type uX) [NormedAddCommGroup X] [NormedSpace ℝ X] : Prop :=  ∀ (ell : X →L[ℝ] ℝ) (v : X),    ‖ContinuousLinearMap.id ℝ X + ell.smulRight v‖ = 1 + ‖ell.smulRight v‖variable {Ω : Type u_1} [MeasurableSpace Ω] (μ : Measure Ω)/-- Convergence-in-measure distance on L1 equivalence classes. -/def measureDistance (f g : Lp ℝ 1 μ) : ℝ :=  sInf {a : ℝ | 0 < a ∧ μ.real {ω | a < |f ω - g ω|} < a}/-- Finite covers of the entire unit ball in convergence-in-measure distance. -/def MeasurePrecompactBall (E : Submodule ℝ (Lp ℝ 1 μ)) : Prop :=  ∀ ε : ℝ, 0 < ε → ∃ s : Finset (Lp ℝ 1 μ),    ∀ y : E, ‖y‖ ≤ 1 → ∃ b ∈ s, measureDistance μ (y : Lp ℝ 1 μ) b < ε/-- Every nonempty unit-ball slice contains an almost antipodal unit vector. -/def UnitSliceProperty (X : Type uX) [NormedAddCommGroup X] [NormedSpace ℝ X] : Prop :=  ∀ (w : X), ‖w‖ = 1 → ∀ (ell : X →L[ℝ] ℝ) (α : ℝ),    (∃ u : X, ‖u‖ ≤ 1 ∧ α < ell u) →    ∀ ρ : ℝ, 0 < ρ → ∃ y : X, ‖y‖ = 1 ∧ α < ell y ∧ 2 - ρ ≤ ‖w + y‖/-- The countable product of unit intervals. -/abbrev KWOmega := ℕ → unitIntervaldef kwMeasure : Measure KWOmega := Measure.infinitePi (fun _ : ℕ => (volume : Measure unitInterval))theorem exact_main {Ω : Type u_1} [MeasurableSpace Ω] (μ : Measure Ω)    [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] (E : Submodule ℝ (Lp ℝ 1 μ))    (_hclosed : IsClosed (E : Set (Lp ℝ 1 μ))) (hdim : ¬ FiniteDimensional ℝ E)    (hprecompact : MeasurePrecompactBall μ E) (hdaugavet : Daugavet E) :    (∀ (x : E), ‖x‖ = 1 → ∀ t : ℝ, 0 < t →      H (normSeminorm ℝ E) x t = max (t / 2) (t - 1) ∧      D (normSeminorm ℝ E) x t = max 0 (t - 2)) ∧    (∀ t : ℝ, 0 < t →      averagedModulus (normSeminorm ℝ E) t = max (t / 2) (t - 1) ∧      oneSidedModulus (normSeminorm ℝ E) t = max 0 (t - 2)) ∧    (∀ N : Seminorm ℝ E, EquivalentNorm N → ¬ AUC N) := by  sorrytheorem kadets_werner_existence :    ∃ E : Submodule ℝ (Lp ℝ 1 kwMeasure),      IsClosed (E : Set (Lp ℝ 1 kwMeasure)) ∧ (¬ FiniteDimensional ℝ E) ∧      MeasurePrecompactBall kwMeasure E ∧ UnitSliceProperty E ∧ Daugavet E := by  sorrytheorem exact_example :    ∃ E : Submodule ℝ (Lp ℝ 1 kwMeasure),      IsClosed (E : Set (Lp ℝ 1 kwMeasure)) ∧ (¬ FiniteDimensional ℝ E) ∧      MeasurePrecompactBall kwMeasure E ∧ UnitSliceProperty E ∧ Daugavet E ∧      (∀ (x : E), ‖x‖ = 1 → ∀ t : ℝ, 0 < t →        H (normSeminorm ℝ E) x t = max (t / 2) (t - 1) ∧        D (normSeminorm ℝ E) x t = max 0 (t - 2)) ∧      (∀ t : ℝ, 0 < t →        averagedModulus (normSeminorm ℝ E) t = max (t / 2) (t - 1) ∧        oneSidedModulus (normSeminorm ℝ E) t = max 0 (t - 2)) ∧      (∀ N : Seminorm ℝ E, EquivalentNorm N → ¬ AUC N) := by  sorryend ExactModuliendend OAI
Every extracted statement of the accompanying papers

The statements the atlas extracted automatically from each accompanying paper’s TeX source, with links to the full sources.

Asymptotic midpoint uniform convexity and unbounded diamond distortion in a reflexive tree space

Theorem

The space X=J^* defined by (eq:segment-norm) is infinite dimensional, separable, and reflexive, and has no equivalent AUC norm. Its given norm satisfies

\widehat\delta_X(t)\ge\sqrt{1+t^2/12}-1\qquad(t>0).

For every integer k\ge0, every embedding of D_k into X has distortion at least \sqrt{1+k/12}.

Section 1, Introduction Read it in the paper TeX source, line 99
Show the TeX
The space $X=J^*$ defined by \eqref{eq:segment-norm} is infinite
dimensional, separable, and reflexive, and has no equivalent AUC norm.
Its given norm satisfies
\[
 \widehat\delta_X(t)\ge\sqrt{1+t^2/12}-1\qquad(t>0).
\]
For every integer $k\ge0$, every embedding of $D_k$ into $X$ has
distortion at least $\sqrt{1+k/12}$.

Midpoint lenses in segment spaces

Theorem

Let Y be either the finite-height forest dual X=J^* or the infinite-height coordinate predual B_\infty. For every finite ancestral H, every x,y\in Y with x=P_Hx, and every R\ge0 with \|x+y\|,\|x-y\|\le R,

\|Q_Hy\|\le2\sqrt{R^2-\|x\|^2}.
Section 1, Introduction Read it in the paper TeX source, line 54
Show the TeX
Let $Y$ be either the finite-height forest dual $X=J^*$ or the
infinite-height coordinate predual $B_\infty$. For every finite
ancestral $H$, every $x,y\in Y$ with $x=P_Hx$, and every $R\ge0$
with $\|x+y\|,\|x-y\|\le R$,
\begin{equation}
 \|Q_Hy\|\le2\sqrt{R^2-\|x\|^2}.
\end{equation}

Distortion of countably branching diamonds from midpoint and tree energies

Theorem

For every integer k\ge0, every distortion-D embedding of \mathcal D_k into either X or B_\infty satisfies

D^2\ge1+k/4.
Section 1, Introduction Read it in the paper TeX source, line 53
Show the TeX
For every integer $k\ge0$, every distortion-$D$ embedding of
$\mathcal D_k$ into either $X$ or $B_\infty$ satisfies
\[
 D^2\ge1+k/4.
\]

Exact asymptotic moduli in a Daugavet subspace of L1

Theorem

Let E be an infinite-dimensional closed real subspace of L^1(\Omega,\mathbb P), where \mathbb P is a probability measure. Suppose its closed unit ball is totally bounded for convergence in measure and its inherited norm has the Daugavet property. Then every x\in S_E and t>0 satisfy

H_E(x,t)=\max\{t/2,t-1\},\qquad D_E(x,t)=\max\{0,t-2\}.

Consequently these are also the formulas for \widehat\delta_E(t) and \overline\delta_E(t). The space E admits no equivalent AUC norm.

Section 1, Introduction Read it in the paper TeX source, line 63
Show the TeX
Let $E$ be an infinite-dimensional closed real subspace of
$L^1(\Omega,\mathbb P)$, where $\mathbb P$ is a probability measure.
Suppose its closed unit ball is totally bounded for convergence in
measure and its inherited norm has the Daugavet property.  Then every
$x\in S_E$ and $t>0$ satisfy
\[
 H_E(x,t)=\max\{t/2,t-1\},\qquad
 D_E(x,t)=\max\{0,t-2\}.
\]
Consequently these are also the formulas for
$\widehat\delta_E(t)$ and $\overline\delta_E(t)$.  The space $E$ admits
no equivalent AUC norm.

Midpoint convexity from bounded tree potentials and path costs

Theorem

Each of the four completed spaces X_K is a separable infinite-dimensional real Banach space. For K\in\{K_{\rm s},K_{\rm p},K_{\rm a},K_{\rm g}\} and 0<t<1,

\widehat\delta_{X_K}(t)\ge\sqrt{1+t^2/4}-1.

None of these spaces admits an equivalent AUC norm.

Section 2, Four potential norms, one pair of inward tests Read it in the paper TeX source, line 63
Show the TeX
Each of the four completed spaces $X_K$ is a separable infinite-dimensional
real Banach space. For $K\in\{K_{\rm s},K_{\rm p},K_{\rm a},K_{\rm g}\}$
and $0<t<1$,
\begin{equation}
 \widehat\delta_{X_K}(t)\ge\sqrt{1+t^2/4}-1.
\end{equation}
None of these spaces admits an equivalent AUC norm.
Theorem

The real Banach space X_{\mathrm e} defined by (fr:tests) and (fr:norm) satisfies

\widehat\delta_{\|\cdot\|_{\mathrm e}}(t) \ge\frac{\sqrt{1+t^2/576}-1}{4}\qquad(0<t<1).

It admits no equivalent AUC norm. More precisely, if \alpha\|\cdot\|_{\mathrm e}\le N\le\beta\|\cdot\|_{\mathrm e}, where 0<\alpha\le\beta<\infty, then \overline\delta_N(\alpha/(4\beta))=0.

Section 4, A free root and a planar perturbation Read it in the paper TeX source, line 67
Show the TeX
The real Banach space $X_{\mathrm e}$ defined by \eqref{fr:tests} and
\eqref{fr:norm} satisfies
\begin{equation}
 \widehat\delta_{\|\cdot\|_{\mathrm e}}(t)
 \ge\frac{\sqrt{1+t^2/576}-1}{4}\qquad(0<t<1).
 
\end{equation}
It admits no equivalent AUC norm.  More precisely, if
$\alpha\|\cdot\|_{\mathrm e}\le N\le\beta\|\cdot\|_{\mathrm e}$,
where $0<\alpha\le\beta<\infty$, then
$\overline\delta_N(\alpha/(4\beta))=0$.
Theorem (Clipping estimate on a head and its complement)

If x,y\in X, P_Ax=x and P_Ay=0 for a finite head A, then, for every c>0,

\max\{\|x+y\|,\|x-y\|\} \ge\frac{\|x\|+c\|y\|/2}{\sqrt{1+4c^2}}.

In particular the left side is at least \sqrt{\|x\|^2+\|y\|^2/16}.

Section 5, Linear costs of root paths Read it in the paper TeX source, line 287
Show the TeX
If $x,y\in X$, $P_Ax=x$ and $P_Ay=0$ for a finite head $A$, then,
for every $c>0$,
\begin{equation}
 \max\{\|x+y\|,\|x-y\|\}
 \ge\frac{\|x\|+c\|y\|/2}{\sqrt{1+4c^2}}.
 
\end{equation}
In particular the left side is at least
$\sqrt{\|x\|^2+\|y\|^2/16}$.

Independent products in real L1: asymptotic midpoint convexity without AUC renormings

Theorem

For every multiplier W as above, the Banach space X_W is infinite dimensional and has no equivalent AUC norm. For the exponential and Gaussian-square laws, the inherited norms satisfy

\begin{aligned}\whdelta_{X_{\mathrm{exp}}}(t) &\ge \frac{7t}{30}c(10/t)>0 &&(t>0),\\ \whdelta_{X_{\mathrm{sq}}}(t) &\ge\frac{\PP\bigl(|G|\ge4\sqrt2(2+\sqrt2)/t\bigr)}{8}>0 &&(t>0),\\ \whdelta_{X_{\mathrm{sq}}}(t) &\ge\frac{\PP\bigl(|G|\ge8\sqrt6/t\bigr)}{4}>0 &&(t>0).\end{aligned}
Section 1, Introduction Read it in the paper TeX source, line 57
Show the TeX
For every multiplier $W$ as above, the Banach space $X_W$ is infinite
dimensional and has no equivalent AUC norm.
For the exponential and Gaussian-square laws, the inherited norms satisfy
\begin{align}
 \whdelta_{X_{\mathrm{exp}}}(t)
 &\ge \frac{7t}{30}c(10/t)>0 &&(t>0),\\
 \whdelta_{X_{\mathrm{sq}}}(t)
 &\ge\frac{\PP\bigl(|G|\ge4\sqrt2(2+\sqrt2)/t\bigr)}{8}>0
 &&(t>0),\\
 \whdelta_{X_{\mathrm{sq}}}(t)
 &\ge\frac{\PP\bigl(|G|\ge8\sqrt6/t\bigr)}{4}>0
 &&(t>0).
\end{align}

Midpoint convexity from two recursive potentials

Theorem

For N=N_\Sigma on X_\Sigma, or N=N_J on X_J, one has

\widehat\delta_N(t)\ge t^3/128\qquad(0<t<1).

For X_0, a finite initial set H, a vector x supported in H, and z\in F_H\setminus\{0\}, one has

\frac{N_0(x+z)+N_0(x-z)}2\ge N_0(x) +\frac{N_0(z)^3}{8(2N_0(x)+N_0(z))^2}.

Each of X_\Sigma,X_0,X_J admits no equivalent AUC norm.

Section 2, The fields, the roots, and the completed spaces Read it in the paper TeX source, line 65
Show the TeX
For $N=N_\Sigma$ on $X_\Sigma$, or $N=N_J$ on $X_J$, one has
\begin{equation}
 \widehat\delta_N(t)\ge t^3/128\qquad(0<t<1).
\end{equation}
For $X_0$, a finite initial set $H$, a vector $x$ supported in $H$, and
$z\in F_H\setminus\{0\}$, one has
\begin{equation}
 \frac{N_0(x+z)+N_0(x-z)}2\ge N_0(x)
 +\frac{N_0(z)^3}{8(2N_0(x)+N_0(z))^2}.
\end{equation}
Each of $X_\Sigma,X_0,X_J$ admits no equivalent AUC norm.
Theorem (Separated midpoint families)

For every \varepsilon>0 there is \eta(\varepsilon)\in(0,1) such that, for x,z_1,z_2,\ldots\in X_J,

\left. \begin{gathered} N_J(x+z_j),N_J(x-z_j)\le1\quad(j\ge1),\\ N_J(z_i-z_j)\ge\varepsilon\quad(i\ne j) \end{gathered} \right\} \quad\Longrightarrow\quad N_J(x)\le1-\eta(\varepsilon).

For 0<\varepsilon\le2, one can take \eta(\varepsilon)=\min\{1/2,\gamma(2,\varepsilon/16)\}.

Section 6, Logarithmic propagation on the joined tree Read it in the paper TeX source, line 480
Show the TeX
For every $\varepsilon>0$ there is $\eta(\varepsilon)\in(0,1)$ such
that, for $x,z_1,z_2,\ldots\in X_J$,
\[
 \left.
 \begin{gathered}
 N_J(x+z_j),N_J(x-z_j)\le1\quad(j\ge1),\\
 N_J(z_i-z_j)\ge\varepsilon\quad(i\ne j)
 \end{gathered}
 \right\}
 \quad\Longrightarrow\quad N_J(x)\le1-\eta(\varepsilon).
\]
For $0<\varepsilon\le2$, one can take
$\eta(\varepsilon)=\min\{1/2,\gamma(2,\varepsilon/16)\}$.
Theorem

Let x\in X_{\mathrm v} have finite total support. In each component where x^{(h)}\ne0, choose a finite ancestral set A_h containing that support. Suppose y\in X_{\mathrm v} vanishes on every such A_h. With S=\|x+y\|_{\mathrm v}^2+\|x-y\|_{\mathrm v}^2, one has

S-2\|x\|_{\mathrm v}^2 \ge c_6 S^{-2}\|y\|_{\mathrm v}^6, \qquad c_6=2\exp(-(\mathrm e-1))4^{-6}.

The right side is zero when S=0.

Section 7, Changing the child exponent with the height Read it in the paper TeX source, line 294
Show the TeX
Let $x\in X_{\mathrm v}$ have finite total support.  In each component
where $x^{(h)}\ne0$, choose a finite ancestral set $A_h$ containing
that support.  Suppose $y\in X_{\mathrm v}$ vanishes on every such
$A_h$.  With
$S=\|x+y\|_{\mathrm v}^2+\|x-y\|_{\mathrm v}^2$, one has
\begin{equation}
 S-2\|x\|_{\mathrm v}^2
 \ge c_6 S^{-2}\|y\|_{\mathrm v}^6,
 \qquad c_6=2\exp(-(\mathrm e-1))4^{-6}.
\end{equation}
The right side is zero when $S=0$.
Configuration and file facts
OpenAI’s Lean catalogue
OpenAI lists this as a main result in its Lean catalogue.
Allowed axioms
propext, Quot.sound, Classical.choiceThe axioms this configuration allows a proof to use. A replay shows which of them a proof uses.
Imports
Mathlib
Imports from outside Mathlib
None
Local vocabulary
14 local vocabulary declarations
Lines of Lean, without comments or blank lines
61
Second proof-verification program (nanoda)
Off in OpenAI's configuration.

Statement comparison

A shareable summary of this page: the proposed paper match, what the Lean statement expresses, and which reviews are recorded.

Plectis Atlas

Exact asymptotic moduli and a Daugavet example

Family 331: Reflexive midpoint convexity and diamond distortion

Candidate pairing

Theorem

Let E be an infinite-dimensional closed real subspace of L^1(\Omega,\mathbb P), where \mathbb P is a probability measure. Suppose its closed unit ball is totally bounded for convergence in measure and its inherited norm has the Daugavet property. Then every x\in S_E and t>0 satisfy

H_E(x,t)=\max\{t/2,t-1\},\qquad D_E(x,t)=\max\{0,t-2\}.

Consequently these are also the formulas for \widehat\delta_E(t) and \overline\delta_E(t). The space E admits no equivalent AUC norm.

Exact asymptotic moduli in a Daugavet subspace of L1

TeX label thm:exact, build/sections/introduction.tex, line 63

The Lean statement says

theorem exact_main {Ω : Type u_1} [MeasurableSpace Ω] (μ : Measure Ω)    [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] (E : Submodule ℝ (Lp ℝ 1 μ))    (_hclosed : IsClosed (E : Set (Lp ℝ 1 μ))) (hdim : ¬ FiniteDimensional ℝ E)    (hprecompact : MeasurePrecompactBall μ E) (hdaugavet : Daugavet E) :    (∀ (x : E), ‖x‖ = 1 → ∀ t : ℝ, 0 < t →      H (normSeminorm ℝ E) x t = max (t / 2) (t - 1) ∧      D (normSeminorm ℝ E) x t = max 0 (t - 2)) ∧    (∀ t : ℝ, 0 < t →      averagedModulus (normSeminorm ℝ E) t = max (t / 2) (t - 1) ∧      oneSidedModulus (normSeminorm ℝ E) t = max 0 (t - 2)) ∧    (∀ N : Seminorm ℝ E, EquivalentNorm N → ¬ AUC N) := by  sorrytheorem kadets_werner_existence :    ∃ E : Submodule ℝ (Lp ℝ 1 kwMeasure),      IsClosed (E : Set (Lp ℝ 1 kwMeasure)) ∧ (¬ FiniteDimensional ℝ E) ∧      MeasurePrecompactBall kwMeasure E ∧ UnitSliceProperty E ∧ Daugavet E := by  sorrytheorem exact_example :

A Lean statement states the theorem and leaves its proof as sorry on purpose. OpenAI’s proof is in a separate solution module, and a program called Comparator checks that proof against this statement.

Atlas selected this possible match because the two statements share words. No review of whether they mean the same thing is recorded.three independent groups report that Comparator accepted runs for this file at the release version shown here.Statement review: none recorded

14 local vocabulary declarationsAllowed axioms: propext, Quot.sound, Classical.choiceopenai/math at fd4aeebwcook04.github.io/plectis-atlas/statements/DaugavetModuli.html

Recorded comparisons with the paper

Atlas records no contributed comparison of this statement with the paper.

Contributed Comparator run reports

Atlas records no contributed report of running Comparator for this statement file.

Compare this statement with the paperShare a Comparator run reportSuggest a change