Lean is a language for mathematical statements and proofs that a computer can verify. This page shows one statement file from OpenAI’s release, possible paper matches and independent reports. The code-like names below identify the definitions or theorems selected by the proof-verification settings.
Theorem selected for verification:OAI.RieszRectifiability.quantitative_higher_codimension_riesz_rectifiability
The lines of the Lean statement that state the theorem, then the definitions in the file that it uses.
defQuantitativeFullStatement : Prop := ∀ d n : ℕ, 4 ≤ d → 2 ≤ n → n + 2 ≤ d → ∀ C_AD : ℝ, 1 ≤ C_AD → ∀ C_R : ℝ≥0, ∃ θ : ℝ, 0 < θ ∧ ∃ M : ℝ≥0, ∀ μ : Measure (Ambient d), μ.Regular → ADRegularWithConstant n C_AD μ → RieszL2BoundedWithConstant n C_R μ → BallImageConclusion n μ θ M⋮theoremquantitative_higher_codimension_riesz_rectifiability : QuantitativeFullStatement := bysorry
A Lean statement states the theorem and leaves its proof as sorry on purpose. OpenAI’s proof is in a separate solution module, and a program called Comparator checks that proof against this statement.
Definitions needed to read it
Local definitions the statement names, followed through the definitions they name in turn. The match is by name in the source text, so a name reached only through notation can be missed; the full file is below.
deftruncated {d : ℕ} (n : ℕ) (μ : Measure (Ambient d)) (ε : ℝ) (f : Ambient d → ℝ) (x : Ambient d) : Ambient d := ∫ y in {y | ε < dist x y}, f y • kernel n x y ∂μ
defBallImageConclusion {d : ℕ} (n : ℕ) (μ : Measure (Ambient d)) (θ : ℝ) (M : ℝ≥0) : Prop := ∀ x ∈ μ.support, ∀ r : ℝ, AdmissibleRadius μ r → ∃ g : (ball (0 : Ambient n) r) → Ambient d, LipschitzWith M g ∧ ENNReal.ofReal (θ * r ^ n) ≤ μ (ball x r ∩ range g)
Possible paper match, with no recorded review
Atlas selected this possible match by comparing words in the Lean statement with every statement in the family. No review of whether the statements mean the same thing is recorded.
Words of the Lean statement, its names split into words, that also appear in the theorem: rectifiable, bound, ad, regular, riesz, measure, integers and constants. Found in the paper’s title, which its main theorem states: higher, codimension and uniform. Shared only with the release’s name for the Lean statement or OpenAI’s note on it: ahlfors and david.
Theorem 1.3 of Riesz transforms and uniform rectifiability in higher codimension
Theorem
Let d\ge4 and 2\le n\le d-2 be integers. Let \mu be an n-Ahlfors–David regular Radon measure on \R^d satisfying (eq:riesz-bound). Then \mu is uniformly n-rectifiable in the sense of Definition def:ur. Its constants \theta and M can be chosen in terms of d,n,C_{\rm AD} and C_{\rm R} alone.
Let $d\ge4$ and $2\le n\le d-2$ be integers. Let $\mu$ be an
$n$-Ahlfors--David regular Radon measure on $\R^d$ satisfying
\eqref{eq:riesz-bound}. Then $\mu$ is uniformly $n$-rectifiable in the
sense of Definition~\ref{def:ur}. Its constants $\theta$ and $M$ can
be chosen in terms of $d,n,C_{\rm AD}$ and $C_{\rm R}$ alone.
Other possible paper matches, closest wording first
Corollary 8.1 of Riesz transforms and uniform rectifiability in higher codimension. Words of the Lean statement, its names split into words, that also appear in the theorem: real, kernel, hard, rectifiability, norm, bound and six more. Shared only with the release’s name for the Lean statement or OpenAI’s note on it: operator, ahlfors and david.
Proposition 3.4 of Riesz transforms and uniform rectifiability in higher codimension. Words of the Lean statement, its names split into words, that also appear in the theorem: single, ball, truncated, hard, norm, bounded and five more. Shared only with the release’s name for the Lean statement or OpenAI’s note on it: operator and transform.
Theorem 7.3 of Riesz transforms and uniform rectifiability in higher codimension. Words of the Lean statement, its names split into words, that also appear in the theorem: images, lipschitz, ad, regular and constants. Shared only with the release’s name for the Lean statement or OpenAI’s note on it: positive, pieces and david.
Theorem 6.4 of Riesz transforms and uniform rectifiability in higher codimension. Words of the Lean statement, its names split into words, that also appear in the theorem: radius, admissible, supported, uniform, measure, riesz and two more.
Proposition 6.3 of Riesz transforms and uniform rectifiability in higher codimension. Words of the Lean statement, its names split into words, that also appear in the theorem: natural, lipschitz, supported, riesz, integer and constants. Shared only with the release’s name for the Lean statement or OpenAI’s note on it: one.
Proposition 5.1 of Riesz transforms and uniform rectifiability in higher codimension. Words of the Lean statement, its names split into words, that also appear in the theorem: conclusions, euclidean, lipschitz, supported, measure and constant.
How Atlas selects possible matches: it compares words in the Lean statement with every statement in the family. It also splits Lean names into words. The release’s label and note receive less weight; a main theorem wins a close match. If the Lean wording yields no clear match, Atlas uses the catalogue description. This selects passages to compare; it does not establish that they mean the same thing.
Reported Comparator runs
One independent group reports that Comparator accepted a run for this Lean statement file: Carlos Toledo’s cert-machine. Each group reports its own Comparator run for this statement file. Atlas has not repeated the runs.
For a configured theorem, Comparator tests whether OpenAI’s proof proves the exact Lean statement. Some files instead configure definitions for comparison by name and type. Acceptance does not establish that the statement means the same thing as the paper’s theorem.
Every Comparator challenge re-run on Linux with nanoda switched on, decided by a preregistered rule; every family’s challenge statements read against OpenAI’s headline, clause by clause. Decider: Comparator (leanprover/comparator d03acab1 = tag v4.34.0, built with the release’s toolchain v4.34.1), lean4export 076e8e57, landrun 811cfff5, nanoda_lib 3a240721 — on GitHub’s Linux runners (.github/workflows/openai-math-kernel.yml), one j…
AcceptedTheir term: “CERTIFIED”.
Re-run through Comparator with the independent nanoda kernel switched on: Lean’s kernel and nanoda both accept OpenAI’s solution.
If Comparator is run under this configuration and accepts, the solution proves the configured theorem using only the allowed axioms, and the Lean kernel accepts every step.
This configuration lists no definition holes, so every definition the statement uses is compared as it is written in this file.
Acceptance leaves open whether the Lean statement means the same thing as the paper’s theorem, whether the paper’s other claims are correct, and whether the result is new. Those questions require comparing the definitions and statements, reviewing the paper’s arguments, and reading the earlier literature.
Do family 081’s Lean statements express the advertised result?
These assessments compare all the family’s Lean statements with the whole result OpenAI describes in its catalogue. They do not assess this statement alone. Each group uses its own published rules.
MathVet and cert-machine agree on how much of the advertised result the Lean statements express.
Finds the whole advertised result stated or impliedTheir term: “full”.
The challenge statements imply the headline claim after unpacking definitions or one routine step. Their record
Their note: None for the headline; uniform n-rectifiability is encoded as big pieces of Lipschitz images (standard equivalent form). The variation / principal-value corollary is not stated.
Definitions the group asks readers to compare with the paper: ADRegularWithConstant, RieszL2BoundedWithConstant (real-valued f, vector-valued hard truncation truncated), BallImageConclusion are custom but standard in form; AdmissibleRadius uses Metric.ediam μ.support
OpenAI’s own note on what this Lean statement covers
“The formalized result proves that bounded Riesz transforms force quantitative uniform rectifiability in higher codimension. For $d\ge4$ and $2\le n\le d-2$, an $n$-Ahlfors–David regular measure whose positive hard truncations have one uniform $L^2$ operator bound has big pieces of Lipschitz images.”
An AI agent drafted an interpretation of that note, classifying this statement as “states a paper’s theorem as the paper does”. No human review of the draft is recorded.
Supporting material
The complete Lean statement file
62 lines, copied from release version fd4aeeb. A name defined in this file links to its line; pointing at the name shows its definition.
Declared in this fileOpenAI’s library at fd4aeebOther linked names open the current documentation for Mathlib, Lean’s mathematical library.
Links in the file: 23 to its own declarations, 24 to Mathlib’s documentation. 9 declared names also link to the same declaration in OpenAI’s library. OpenAI uses Mathlib version d13f23b. The linked documentation describes the current version, so names that have since changed may be missing there.
Let d\ge4 and 2\le n\le d-2 be integers. Let \mu be an n-Ahlfors–David regular Radon measure on \R^d satisfying (eq:riesz-bound). Then \mu is uniformly n-rectifiable in the sense of Definition def:ur. Its constants \theta and M can be chosen in terms of d,n,C_{\rm AD} and C_{\rm R} alone.
Let $d\ge4$ and $2\le n\le d-2$ be integers. Let $\mu$ be an
$n$-Ahlfors--David regular Radon measure on $\R^d$ satisfying
\eqref{eq:riesz-bound}. Then $\mu$ is uniformly $n$-rectifiable in the
sense of Definition~\ref{def:ur}. Its constants $\theta$ and $M$ can
be chosen in terms of $d,n,C_{\rm AD}$ and $C_{\rm R}$ alone.
Proposition(Regular dyadic cells)
If D_E>0, there are a common \mu-null set N\subset E and families \mathcal D_k of Borel cells in E\setminus N such that:
(i)
each \mathcal D_k partitions E\setminus N, and cells of different generations are disjoint or nested;
(ii)
writing \ell(Q)=2^{-k} for Q\in\mathcal D_k, there are centers z_Q\in Q and constants 0<c_0\le1/2, C_0\ge2 for which
every non-top cell has one parent, and every cell has finitely many children. When D_E=\infty, all integer generations are available. When D_E<\infty, there is a largest scale \ell_0 with D_E\le\ell_0<2D_E, and finitely many cells at that scale.
If $D_E>0$, there are a common $\mu$-null set $N\subset E$ and
families $\mathcal D_k$ of Borel cells in $E\setminus N$ such that:
\begin{enumerate}[label=(\roman*)]
\item each $\mathcal D_k$ partitions $E\setminus N$, and cells of
different generations are disjoint or nested;
\item writing $\ell(Q)=2^{-k}$ for $Q\in\mathcal D_k$, there are
centers $z_Q\in Q$ and constants $0<c_0\le1/2$, $C_0\ge2$ for which
\[
(E\setminus N)\cap B(z_Q,c_0\ell(Q))\subset Q
\subset E\cap B(z_Q,C_0\ell(Q)),\qquad
c_1\ell(Q)^n\le\mu(Q)\le C_1\ell(Q)^n;
\]
\item every non-top cell has one parent, and every cell has finitely
many children. When
$D_E=\infty$, all integer generations are available. When
$D_E<\infty$, there is a largest scale $\ell_0$ with
$D_E\le\ell_0<2D_E$, and finitely many cells at that scale.
\end{enumerate}
All constants depend only on $d,n,C_{\rm AD}$.
Family 081: Riesz transforms and rectifiability in higher codimension
Candidate pairing
Theorem
Let d\ge4 and 2\le n\le d-2 be integers. Let \mu be an n-Ahlfors–David regular Radon measure on \R^d satisfying (eq:riesz-bound). Then \mu is uniformly n-rectifiable in the sense of Definition def:ur. Its constants \theta and M can be chosen in terms of d,n,C_{\rm AD} and C_{\rm R} alone.
Riesz transforms and uniform rectifiability in higher codimension
TeX label thm:main, build/sections/00-introduction.tex, line 61
The Lean statement says
defQuantitativeFullStatement : Prop := ∀ d n : ℕ, 4 ≤ d → 2 ≤ n → n + 2 ≤ d → ∀ C_AD : ℝ, 1 ≤ C_AD → ∀ C_R : ℝ≥0, ∃ θ : ℝ, 0 < θ ∧ ∃ M : ℝ≥0, ∀ μ : Measure (Ambient d), μ.Regular → ADRegularWithConstant n C_AD μ → RieszL2BoundedWithConstant n C_R μ → BallImageConclusion n μ θ M⋮theoremquantitative_higher_codimension_riesz_rectifiability : QuantitativeFullStatement := bysorry
A Lean statement states the theorem and leaves its proof as sorry on purpose. OpenAI’s proof is in a separate solution module, and a program called Comparator checks that proof against this statement.
Recorded comparisons with the paper
Atlas records no contributed comparison of this statement with the paper.
Contributed Comparator run reports
Atlas records no contributed report of running Comparator for this statement file.