Lean is a language for mathematical statements and proofs that a computer can verify. This page shows one statement file from OpenAI’s release, possible paper matches and independent reports. The code-like names below identify the definitions or theorems selected by the proof-verification settings.
Theorem selected for verification:OAI.PlanarL1.planar_graph_metrics_embed_L1
The lines of the Lean statement that state the theorem, then the definitions in the file that it uses.
defMainStatement : Prop := ∃ C : ℝ, 1 ≤ C ∧ ∀ (n : ℕ) (G : SimpleGraph (Fin n)) (length : Fin n → Fin n → ℝ), G.Connected → IsPlanar G → (∀ u v, length u v = length v u) → (∀ u v, G.Adj u v → 0 < length u v) → ∃ (Ω : Type) (measurable : MeasurableSpace Ω) (μ : @MeasureTheory.Measure Ω measurable) (f : Fin n → @MeasureTheory.Lp Ω ℝ measurable _ 1 μ), ∀ x y, graphDistance G length x y ≤ ‖f x - f y‖ ∧ ‖f x - f y‖ ≤ C * graphDistance G length x y⋮theoremplanar_graph_metrics_embed_L1 : MainStatement := bysorry
A Lean statement states the theorem and leaves its proof as sorry on purpose. OpenAI’s proof is in a separate solution module, and a program called Comparator checks that proof against this statement.
Definitions needed to read it
Local definitions the statement names, followed through the definitions they name in turn. The match is by name in the source text, so a name reached only through notation can be missed; the full file is below.
∃ (point : V → ℝ × ℝ) (arc : ∀ u v : V, G.Adj u v → C(unitInterval, ℝ × ℝ)), Function.Injective point ∧ (∀ u v h, (arc u v h) 0 = point u ∧ (arc u v h) 1 = point v) ∧ (∀ u v h, Function.Injective (arc u v h)) ∧ (∀ u v h (t : unitInterval) w, 0 < (t : ℝ) → (t : ℝ) < 1 → (arc u v h) t ≠ point w) ∧ (∀ u v h x y k (s t : unitInterval),0 < (s : ℝ) → (s : ℝ) < 1 → 0 < (t : ℝ) → (t : ℝ) < 1 → (arc u v h) s = (arc x y k) t → (u = x ∧ v = y) ∨ (u = y ∧ v = x))
defwalkLength {V : Type} {G : SimpleGraph V} (length : V → V → ℝ) {u v : V} : G.Walk u v → ℝ | .nil => 0 | @SimpleGraph.Walk.cons _ _ u w _ _ p => length u w + walkLength length p
noncomputabledefgraphDistance {V : Type} (G : SimpleGraph V) (length : V → V → ℝ) (u v : V) : ℝ := sInf (Set.range (fun p : G.Walk u v => walkLength length p))
Possible paper match, with no recorded review
Atlas selected this possible match by comparing words in the Lean statement with every statement in the family. No review of whether the statements mean the same thing is recorded.
Words of the Lean statement, its names split into words, that also appear in the theorem: universal, planar, real, positive, connected, measure, edge, space and three more. Found in the paper’s title, which its main theorem states: embed, distortion and metrics. Shared only with the release’s name for the Lean statement or OpenAI’s note on it: constant.
Statements in Planar Graph Metrics Embed into L1 with Constant Distortion come first because the release’s name for this Lean statement shares words with that paper’s title.
Theorem 1.1 of Planar Graph Metrics Embed into L1 with Constant Distortion
Theorem
There is a finite universal constant C\ge1 with the following property. For every finite connected planar graph G=(V,E) with strictly positive real edge lengths, there exist a measure space (\Omega,\mathcal F,\mu) and a map f:V\to L_1(\Omega,\mathcal F,\mu;\R) such that
d_G(x,y)\le\|f(x)-f(y)\|_1\le C d_G(x,y)
\qquad(x,y\in V).
There is a finite universal constant $C\ge1$ with the following property.
For every finite connected planar graph $G=(V,E)$ with strictly positive real
edge lengths, there exist a measure space $(\Omega,\mathcal F,\mu)$ and a map
$f:V\to L_1(\Omega,\mathcal F,\mu;\R)$ such that
\[
d_G(x,y)\le\|f(x)-f(y)\|_1\le C d_G(x,y)
\qquad(x,y\in V).
\]
Other possible paper matches, closest wording first
Proposition 2.3 of Planar Graph Metrics Embed into L1 with Constant Distortion. Words of the Lean statement, its names split into words, that also appear in the theorem: planar, realization, distances, positive, connected, edge and four more.
Corollary 10.1 of Planar Graph Metrics Embed into L1 with Constant Distortion. Words of the Lean statement, its names split into words, that also appear in the theorem: simple, distortion, real, positive, integers, connected and six more. Shared only with the release’s name for the Lean statement or OpenAI’s note on it: constant.
Theorem 1.1 of L1 Embeddings of Graphs of Bounded Treewidth. Words of the Lean statement, its names split into words, that also appear in the theorem: vertices, real, integer, function, connected, edge and four more. Found in the paper’s title, which its main theorem states: bounded. Shared only with the release’s name for the Lean statement or OpenAI’s note on it: ratios, number, independent and constant.
Proposition 9.1 of Planar Graph Metrics Embed into L1 with Constant Distortion. Words of the Lean statement, its names split into words, that also appear in the theorem: vertex, distance, vertices, point, measure, one and one more. Shared only with the release’s name for the Lean statement or OpenAI’s note on it: constants.
Corollary 4.6 of Planar Graph Metrics Embed into L1 with Constant Distortion. Words of the Lean statement, its names split into words, that also appear in the theorem: arbitrary, intervals, functions, point, metrics, one and two more. Shared only with the release’s name for the Lean statement or OpenAI’s note on it: paths, independent and constants.
Theorem 4.1 of Planar Graph Metrics Embed into L1 with Constant Distortion. Words of the Lean statement, its names split into words, that also appear in the theorem: realization, function, points, one, spaced and length. Shared only with the release’s name for the Lean statement or OpenAI’s note on it: including, paths and independent.
How Atlas selects possible matches: it compares words in the Lean statement with every statement in the family. It also splits Lean names into words. The release’s label and note receive less weight; a main theorem wins a close match. If the Lean wording yields no clear match, Atlas uses the catalogue description. This selects passages to compare; it does not establish that they mean the same thing.
Reported Comparator runs
two independent groups report that Comparator accepted runs for this Lean statement file: Carlos Toledo’s cert-machine; MathVet. Each group reports its own Comparator run for this statement file. Atlas has not repeated the runs.
For a configured theorem, Comparator tests whether OpenAI’s proof proves the exact Lean statement. Some files instead configure definitions for comparison by name and type. Acceptance does not establish that the statement means the same thing as the paper’s theorem.
Every Comparator challenge re-run on Linux with nanoda switched on, decided by a preregistered rule; every family’s challenge statements read against OpenAI’s headline, clause by clause. Decider: Comparator (leanprover/comparator d03acab1 = tag v4.34.0, built with the release’s toolchain v4.34.1), lean4export 076e8e57, landrun 811cfff5, nanoda_lib 3a240721 — on GitHub’s Linux runners (.github/workflows/openai-math-kernel.yml), one j…
AcceptedTheir term: “CERTIFIED”.
Re-run through Comparator with the independent nanoda kernel switched on: Lean’s kernel and nanoda both accept OpenAI’s solution.
An independent, model-assisted, pre-referee reading of each family’s challenge statements against its headline claim under a published rubric (PROTOCOL.md), with its own Comparator runs per challenge. Its protocol describes a planned error-rate study; this import does not establish that the study has been completed.
AcceptedTheir term: “comparator-sandboxed-pass”.
Re-run through Comparator in a sandboxed virtual machine: accepted.
If Comparator is run under this configuration and accepts, the solution proves the configured theorem using only the allowed axioms, and the Lean kernel accepts every step.
This configuration lists no definition holes, so every definition the statement uses is compared as it is written in this file.
Acceptance leaves open whether the Lean statement means the same thing as the paper’s theorem, whether the paper’s other claims are correct, and whether the result is new. Those questions require comparing the definitions and statements, reviewing the paper’s arguments, and reading the earlier literature.
Do family 089’s Lean statements express the advertised result?
These assessments compare all the family’s Lean statements with the whole result OpenAI describes in its catalogue. They do not assess this statement alone. Each group uses its own published rules.
MathVet and cert-machine disagree on how much of the advertised result the Lean statements express.
Finds the whole advertised result stated or impliedTheir term: “full”.
The challenge statements imply the headline claim after unpacking definitions or one routine step. Their record
Their note: Both L1-embedding theorems are stated; the flow-cut-gap corollary is not. Planarity is a hand-rolled topological drawing predicate.
Definitions the group asks readers to compare with the paper: IsPlanar is a custom 'drawing by simple plane arcs' predicate (injective points, arc u v h : C(unitInterval, ℝ × ℝ) per oriented edge, interiors of arcs of distinct unoriented edges disjoint); HasTreeDecomposition and graphDistance := sInf (range walkLength) are also hand-rolled; both read as standard
Finds part of it stated, or a narrower or weaker statementTheir term: “NARROWER — UNDECLARED”.
The challenge statements state less than the headline, and OpenAI’s Lean note does not say so. Their record
Their note: Only the flow–cut-gap sentence, a classical corollary of the stated embeddings (LLR 1995 / Aumann–Rabani 1998); no flow or cut object appears in either challenge.
OpenAI’s own note on what this Lean statement covers
“The formalized result gives one constant $C$ for every finite connected planar graph with arbitrary positive real edge lengths: its weighted shortest-path metric embeds into real $L_1$ with distortion at most $C$. The constant is independent of the number of vertices and the ratios between edge lengths; singleton graphs are included.”
An AI agent drafted an interpretation of that note, classifying this statement as “states a paper’s theorem as the paper does”. No human review of the draft is recorded.
Supporting material
The complete Lean statement file
51 lines, copied from release version fd4aeeb. A name defined in this file links to its line; pointing at the name shows its definition.
Declared in this fileOpenAI’s library at fd4aeebOther linked names open the current documentation for Mathlib, Lean’s mathematical library.
Links in the file: 6 to its own declarations, 19 to Mathlib’s documentation. 4 declared names also link to the same declaration in OpenAI’s library. OpenAI uses Mathlib version d13f23b. The linked documentation describes the current version, so names that have since changed may be missing there.
import Mathlibnamespace OAInamespace PlanarL1/-- A topological drawing by simple plane arcs, with injective vertex placement,no vertex in an edge interior, and disjoint interiors for distinct unoriented edges. -/defIsPlanar {V : Type} (G : SimpleGraph V) : Prop := ∃ (point : V → ℝ × ℝ) (arc : ∀ u v : V, G.Adj u v → C(unitInterval, ℝ × ℝ)),Function.Injective point ∧ (∀ u v h, (arc u v h) 0 = point u ∧ (arc u v h) 1 = point v) ∧ (∀ u v h, Function.Injective (arc u v h)) ∧ (∀ u v h (t : unitInterval) w, 0 < (t : ℝ) → (t : ℝ) < 1 → (arc u v h) t ≠ point w) ∧ (∀ u v h x y k (s t : unitInterval),0 < (s : ℝ) → (s : ℝ) < 1 → 0 < (t : ℝ) → (t : ℝ) < 1 → (arc u v h) s = (arc x y k) t → (u = x ∧ v = y) ∨ (u = y ∧ v = x))/-- The sum of edge lengths along a finite graph walk. -/defwalkLength {V : Type} {G : SimpleGraph V} (length : V → V → ℝ) {u v : V} : G.Walk u v → ℝ | .nil => 0 | @SimpleGraph.Walk.cons _ _ u w _ _ p => length u w + walkLength length p/-- The infimum of lengths of actual walks between the two vertices. -/noncomputabledefgraphDistance {V : Type} (G : SimpleGraph V) (length : V → V → ℝ) (u v : V) : ℝ :=sInf (Set.range (fun p : G.Walk u v => walkLength length p))/-- One universal distortion bound for finite connected planar graphs witharbitrary symmetric positive edge lengths, realized in a real `L¹` space. -/defMainStatement : Prop := ∃ C : ℝ, 1 ≤ C ∧ ∀ (n : ℕ) (G : SimpleGraph (Fin n)) (length : Fin n → Fin n → ℝ), G.Connected → IsPlanar G → (∀ u v, length u v = length v u) → (∀ u v, G.Adj u v → 0 < length u v) → ∃ (Ω : Type) (measurable : MeasurableSpace Ω) (μ : @MeasureTheory.Measure Ω measurable) (f : Fin n → @MeasureTheory.Lp Ω ℝ measurable _ 1 μ), ∀ x y, graphDistance G length x y ≤ ‖f x - f y‖ ∧ ‖f x - f y‖ ≤ C * graphDistance G length x ytheoremplanar_graph_metrics_embed_L1 : MainStatement := bysorryend PlanarL1end OAI
Every extracted statement of the accompanying papers
The statements the atlas extracted automatically from each accompanying paper’s TeX source, with links to the full sources.
There is a finite universal constant C\ge1 with the following property. For every finite connected planar graph G=(V,E) with strictly positive real edge lengths, there exist a measure space (\Omega,\mathcal F,\mu) and a map f:V\to L_1(\Omega,\mathcal F,\mu;\R) such that
d_G(x,y)\le\|f(x)-f(y)\|_1\le C d_G(x,y)
\qquad(x,y\in V).
There is a finite universal constant $C\ge1$ with the following property.
For every finite connected planar graph $G=(V,E)$ with strictly positive real
edge lengths, there exist a measure space $(\Omega,\mathcal F,\mu)$ and a map
$f:V\to L_1(\Omega,\mathcal F,\mu;\R)$ such that
\[
d_G(x,y)\le\|f(x)-f(y)\|_1\le C d_G(x,y)
\qquad(x,y\in V).
\]
For every integer k\ge2 there is a finite constant C_k\ge1 with the following property. If a finite connected graph G=(V,E) admits a tree decomposition with bags of size at most k, then, for every edge-length function \ell:E\to(0,\infty), there is a map F from V into a real L_1 space such that
For every integer $k\ge2$ there is a finite constant $C_k\ge1$ with the
following property. If a finite connected graph $G=(V,E)$ admits a tree
decomposition with bags of size at most $k$, then, for every edge-length
function $\ell:E\to(0,\infty)$, there is a map $F$ from $V$ into a real
$L_1$ space such that
\begin{equation}
d_{G,\ell}(u,v)
\le \|F(u)-F(v)\|_1
\le C_k\,d_{G,\ell}(u,v)
\qquad(u,v\in V).
\end{equation}
The constant is independent of the number of vertices, the depth of the
decomposition, and all ratios of edge lengths.
propext, Quot.sound, Classical.choiceThe axioms this configuration allows a proof to use. A replay shows which of them a proof uses.
Imports
Mathlib
Imports from outside Mathlib
None
Local vocabulary
4 local vocabulary declarations
Lines of Lean, without comments or blank lines
31
Second proof-verification program (nanoda)
Off in OpenAI's configuration.
Statement comparison
A shareable summary of this page: the proposed paper match, what the Lean statement expresses, and which reviews are recorded.
Plectis Atlas
Planar graph metrics in $L_1$
Family 089: Bounded-distortion L1 embeddings of planar and bounded-treewidth graphs
Candidate pairing
Theorem
There is a finite universal constant C\ge1 with the following property. For every finite connected planar graph G=(V,E) with strictly positive real edge lengths, there exist a measure space (\Omega,\mathcal F,\mu) and a map f:V\to L_1(\Omega,\mathcal F,\mu;\R) such that
d_G(x,y)\le\|f(x)-f(y)\|_1\le C d_G(x,y)
\qquad(x,y\in V).
Planar Graph Metrics Embed into L1 with Constant Distortion
TeX label thm:main, build/sections/introduction.tex, line 13
The Lean statement says
defMainStatement : Prop := ∃ C : ℝ, 1 ≤ C ∧ ∀ (n : ℕ) (G : SimpleGraph (Fin n)) (length : Fin n → Fin n → ℝ), G.Connected → IsPlanar G → (∀ u v, length u v = length v u) → (∀ u v, G.Adj u v → 0 < length u v) → ∃ (Ω : Type) (measurable : MeasurableSpace Ω) (μ : @MeasureTheory.Measure Ω measurable) (f : Fin n → @MeasureTheory.Lp Ω ℝ measurable _ 1 μ), ∀ x y, graphDistance G length x y ≤ ‖f x - f y‖ ∧ ‖f x - f y‖ ≤ C * graphDistance G length x y⋮theoremplanar_graph_metrics_embed_L1 : MainStatement := bysorry
A Lean statement states the theorem and leaves its proof as sorry on purpose. OpenAI’s proof is in a separate solution module, and a program called Comparator checks that proof against this statement.
Recorded comparisons with the paper
Atlas records no contributed comparison of this statement with the paper.
Contributed Comparator run reports
Atlas records no contributed report of running Comparator for this statement file.
Questions to resolve when comparing this statement with the paper
Two independent readers, MathVet and cert-machine, disagree on whether this family's challenges state its headline; a specialist reading would settle it.