Lean is a language for mathematical statements and proofs that a computer can verify. This page shows one statement file from OpenAI’s release, possible paper matches and independent reports. The code-like names below identify the definitions or theorems selected by the proof-verification settings.
Theorem selected for verification:OAI.CriticalPercolation.BondGraph.no_percolation_at_criticality
A Lean statement states the theorem and leaves its proof as sorry on purpose. OpenAI’s proof is in a separate solution module, and a program called Comparator checks that proof against this statement.
Definitions needed to read it
Local definitions the statement names, followed through the definitions they name in turn. The match is by name in the source text, so a name reached only through notation can be missed; the full file is below.
Atlas selected this possible match by comparing words in the Lean statement with every statement in the family. No review of whether the statements mean the same thing is recorded.
Words of the Lean statement, its names split into words, that also appear in the theorem: neighbor, parameter, critical, bernoulli, bond, cluster, percolation and infinite.
Statements in Critical bond and site percolation on the cubic lattice come first because the Lean file and module names share words with that paper’s title.
Theorem 1.1 of Critical bond and site percolation on the cubic lattice
Theorem
For nearest-neighbor Bernoulli bond percolation on \mathbb Z^3, there is almost surely no infinite open cluster at the bond critical parameter. The same assertion holds for nearest-neighbor Bernoulli site percolation at the site critical parameter.
For nearest-neighbor Bernoulli bond percolation on $\mathbb Z^3$, there is
almost surely no infinite open cluster at the bond critical parameter.
The same assertion holds for nearest-neighbor Bernoulli site percolation
at the site critical parameter.
Other possible paper matches, closest wording first
Proposition 4.1 of No percolation at criticality on quasi-transitive graphs. Words of the Lean statement, its names split into words, that also appear in the theorem: distinct, least, simple, positive, event, path and ten more.
Theorem 1.1 of No percolation at criticality on quasi-transitive graphs. Words of the Lean statement, its names split into words, that also appear in the theorem: undirected, quasi, transitive, vertex, connected, locally and four more. Found in the paper’s title, which its main theorem states: criticality and percolation.
Theorem 7.1 of No percolation at criticality on quasi-transitive graphs. Words of the Lean statement, its names split into words, that also appear in the theorem: automorphisms, criticality, orbits, group, finitely, many and nine more.
Proposition 7.2 of No percolation at criticality on quasi-transitive graphs. Words of the Lean statement, its names split into words, that also appear in the theorem: aut, orbits, group, finitely, quasi, many and seven more.
Proposition 8.1 of No percolation at criticality on quasi-transitive graphs. Words of the Lean statement, its names split into words, that also appear in the theorem: map, one, event, automorphisms, orbits, edge and twelve more.
Theorem 2.2 of No percolation at criticality on quasi-transitive graphs. Words of the Lean statement, its names split into words, that also appear in the theorem: quasi, transitive, critical, bernoulli, connected, locally and six more.
How Atlas selects possible matches: it compares words in the Lean statement with every statement in the family. It also splits Lean names into words. The release’s label and note receive less weight; a main theorem wins a close match. If the Lean wording yields no clear match, Atlas uses the catalogue description. This selects passages to compare; it does not establish that they mean the same thing.
Reported Comparator runs
two independent groups report that Comparator accepted runs for this Lean statement file: Carlos Toledo’s cert-machine; MathVet. Each group reports its own Comparator run for this statement file. Atlas has not repeated the runs.
For a configured theorem, Comparator tests whether OpenAI’s proof proves the exact Lean statement. Some files instead configure definitions for comparison by name and type. Acceptance does not establish that the statement means the same thing as the paper’s theorem.
Every Comparator challenge re-run on Linux with nanoda switched on, decided by a preregistered rule; every family’s challenge statements read against OpenAI’s headline, clause by clause. Decider: Comparator (leanprover/comparator d03acab1 = tag v4.34.0, built with the release’s toolchain v4.34.1), lean4export 076e8e57, landrun 811cfff5, nanoda_lib 3a240721 — on GitHub’s Linux runners (.github/workflows/openai-math-kernel.yml), one j…
AcceptedTheir term: “CERTIFIED”.
Re-run through Comparator with the independent nanoda kernel switched on: Lean’s kernel and nanoda both accept OpenAI’s solution.
An independent, model-assisted, pre-referee reading of each family’s challenge statements against its headline claim under a published rubric (PROTOCOL.md), with its own Comparator runs per challenge. Its protocol describes a planned error-rate study; this import does not establish that the study has been completed.
AcceptedTheir term: “comparator-sandboxed-pass”.
Re-run through Comparator in a sandboxed virtual machine: accepted.
If Comparator is run under this configuration and accepts, the solution proves the configured theorem using only the allowed axioms, and the Lean kernel accepts every step.
This configuration lists no definition holes, so every definition the statement uses is compared as it is written in this file.
Acceptance leaves open whether the Lean statement means the same thing as the paper’s theorem, whether the paper’s other claims are correct, and whether the result is new. Those questions require comparing the definitions and statements, reviewing the paper’s arguments, and reading the earlier literature.
Do family 213’s Lean statements express the advertised result?
These assessments compare all the family’s Lean statements with the whole result OpenAI describes in its catalogue. They do not assess this statement alone. Each group uses its own published rules.
MathVet and cert-machine agree on how much of the advertised result the Lean statements express.
OpenAI’s own note on what this Lean statement covers
“The formalization proves absence of an infinite cluster at criticality for Bernoulli bond percolation on every infinite connected locally finite quasi-transitive graph with critical probability $p_c<1$. At $p=p_c$, the probability that any infinite cluster exists is zero. The graph model permits bond multiplicities.”
An AI agent drafted an interpretation of that note, classifying this statement as “states a paper’s theorem as the paper does”. No human review of the draft is recorded.
Supporting material
The complete Lean statement file
63 lines, copied from release version fd4aeeb. A name defined in this file links to its line; pointing at the name shows its definition.
Declared in this fileOpenAI’s library at fd4aeebOther linked names open the current documentation for Mathlib, Lean’s mathematical library.
Links in the file: 2 to its own declarations, 21 to Mathlib’s documentation. 11 declared names also link to the same declaration in OpenAI’s library. OpenAI uses Mathlib version d13f23b. The linked documentation describes the current version, so names that have since changed may be missing there.
import Mathlibnamespace OAIopen Set MeasureTheory ProbabilityTheorynamespace CriticalPercolation/-- An undirected graph with labelled bonds, including loops and parallel bonds. -/structureBondGraph (V E : Type*) whereends : E → Sym2 Vnamespace BondGraphvariable {V E : Type*} (G : BondGraph V E)/-- The graph of retained bonds. `fromEdgeSet` discards loops. -/defopenGraph (ω : Set E) : SimpleGraph V :=SimpleGraph.fromEdgeSet (G.ends '' ω)/-- The underlying connectivity graph with every bond retained. -/deffullGraph : SimpleGraph V := G.openGraph Set.univ/-- Local finiteness counts bonds, not just distinct neighbors. -/defLocallyFinite : Prop := ∀ v : V, {e : E | v ∈ G.ends e}.Finite/-- Automorphisms preserve the vertex and bond structure, including multiplicities. -/structureAutwherevertex : V ≃ Vedge : E ≃ Epreserves : ∀ e, G.ends (edge e) = Sym2.map vertex (G.ends e)/-- Finitely many vertex orbits under the full automorphism group. -/defQuasiTransitive : Prop := ∃ S : Set V, S.Finite ∧ ∀ v : V, ∃ s ∈ S, ∃ φ : G.Aut, φ.vertex s = v/-- Finite open paths, including the path of length zero, define the open cluster. -/defcluster (ω : Set E) (v : V) : Set V := {w | (G.openGraph ω).Reachable v w}/-- The event that at least one open cluster is infinite. -/defpercolates : Set (Set E) := {ω | ∃ v : V, (G.cluster ω v).Infinite}/-- Independent retention with parameter `p ∈ [0,1]` of each labelled bond. -/noncomputabledeflaw (_G : BondGraph V E) (p : unitInterval) : Measure (Set E) :=ProbabilityTheory.setBernoulliSet.univ p/-- The infimum of parameters with positive probability of an infinite cluster. -/noncomputabledefcriticalProbability : unitInterval :=sInf {p : unitInterval | 0 < G.law p G.percolates}/-- Critical Bernoulli bond percolation has no infinite cluster when the criticalprobability is below one. -/theoremno_percolation_at_criticality [Infinite V] (hconnected : G.fullGraph.Connected) (hlocal : G.LocallyFinite) (hquasi : G.QuasiTransitive) (hpc : G.criticalProbability < 1) : G.law G.criticalProbability G.percolates = 0 := bysorryend BondGraphend CriticalPercolationend OAI
Every extracted statement of the accompanying papers
The statements the atlas extracted automatically from each accompanying paper’s TeX source, with links to the full sources.
For nearest-neighbor Bernoulli bond percolation on \mathbb Z^3, there is almost surely no infinite open cluster at the bond critical parameter. The same assertion holds for nearest-neighbor Bernoulli site percolation at the site critical parameter.
For nearest-neighbor Bernoulli bond percolation on $\mathbb Z^3$, there is
almost surely no infinite open cluster at the bond critical parameter.
The same assertion holds for nearest-neighbor Bernoulli site percolation
at the site critical parameter.
Let $G$ be an infinite connected locally finite quasi-transitive
undirected graph. If $\pc(G)<1$, then
\[
\PP_{\pc(G)}(\text{there is an infinite open cluster})=0.
\]
Equivalently, $\PP_{\pc(G)}(|C_x|=\infty)=0$ for every vertex $x$.
OpenAI’s Lean catalogue does not list this as a main result; the release’s Lean notes for family 213 link it.
Solution module
OAI.Probability.CriticalPercolation.Main
Allowed axioms
propext, Quot.sound, Classical.choiceThe axioms this configuration allows a proof to use. A replay shows which of them a proof uses.
Imports
Mathlib
Imports from outside Mathlib
None
Local vocabulary
10 local vocabulary declarations
Lines of Lean, without comments or blank lines
25
Second proof-verification program (nanoda)
Off in OpenAI's configuration.
Statement comparison
A shareable summary of this page: the proposed paper match, what the Lean statement expresses, and which reviews are recorded.
Plectis Atlas
No infinite cluster at the critical probability
Family 213: Critical percolation on every quasi-transitive graph
Candidate pairing
Theorem
For nearest-neighbor Bernoulli bond percolation on \mathbb Z^3, there is almost surely no infinite open cluster at the bond critical parameter. The same assertion holds for nearest-neighbor Bernoulli site percolation at the site critical parameter.
Critical bond and site percolation on the cubic lattice
TeX label thm:main, build/introduction.tex, line 17
A Lean statement states the theorem and leaves its proof as sorry on purpose. OpenAI’s proof is in a separate solution module, and a program called Comparator checks that proof against this statement.
Recorded comparisons with the paper
Atlas records no contributed comparison of this statement with the paper.
Contributed Comparator run reports
Atlas records no contributed report of running Comparator for this statement file.