Plectis Atlas
Search

↑ and ↓ move, Enter opens, Esc closes.

Lean statement

Sharp endpoint divergence

Lean is a language for mathematical statements and proofs that a computer can verify. This page shows one statement file from OpenAI’s release, possible paper matches and independent reports. The code-like names below identify the definitions or theorems selected by the proof-verification settings.

Theorem selected for verification: OAI.Brennan.Sharp.sharp_endpoints

Lean statement file: BrennanSharp.leanShow on the mapFamily 072. OpenAI lists this as a main result in its Lean catalogue.

The Lean statement

The lines of the Lean statement that state the theorem, then the definitions in the file that it uses.

def SharpEndpointStatement : Prop :=  Schlicht koebeMap ∧  areaMoment koebeMap disk (-2) = ⊤ ∧  areaMoment koebeMap disk (2 / 3) = ⊤ ∧  ¬ IntegrableOn (fun z => ‖deriv koebeInverse z‖ ^ (4 : ℝ)) koebeDomain volume ∧  ¬ IntegrableOn (fun z => ‖deriv koebeInverse z‖ ^ (4 / 3 : ℝ)) koebeDomain volumetheorem sharp_endpoints : SharpEndpointStatement := by  sorry

A Lean statement states the theorem and leaves its proof as sorry on purpose. OpenAI’s proof is in a separate solution module, and a program called Comparator checks that proof against this statement.

Definitions needed to read it

Local definitions the statement names, followed through the definitions they name in turn. The match is by name in the source text, so a name reached only through notation can be missed; the full file is below.

  • definition OAI.Brennan.disk line 10

    def disk : Set ℂ := Metric.ball 0 1
  • definition OAI.Brennan.UnivalentOn line 12

    def UnivalentOn (f : ℂ → ℂ) (U : Set ℂ) : Prop :=  DifferentiableOn ℂ f U ∧ Set.InjOn f U
  • definition OAI.Brennan.Schlicht line 15

    def Schlicht (f : ℂ → ℂ) : Prop :=  UnivalentOn f disk ∧ f 0 = 0 ∧ deriv f 0 = 1
  • definition OAI.Brennan.koebeMap line 18

    def koebeMap (z : ℂ) : ℂ := z/(1-z)^2
  • definition OAI.Brennan.Sharp.koebeDomain line 22

    def koebeDomain : Set ℂ := koebeMap '' disk
  • definition OAI.Brennan.Sharp.koebeInverse line 24

    def koebeInverse : ℂ → ℂ := Function.invFunOn koebeMap disk
  • definition OAI.Brennan.Sharp.areaMoment line 26

    def areaMoment (f : ℂ → ℂ) (U : Set ℂ) (t : ℝ) : ℝ≥0∞ :=  ∫⁻ z in U, ENNReal.ofReal (‖deriv f z‖ ^ t) ∂volume

Possible paper match, with no recorded review

No paper statement clearly matched the Lean wording. Statement Map, the program that collects Atlas’s source records, selected this possible match using words in OpenAI’s catalogue and Lean note. No review of whether the statements mean the same thing is recorded.

Shared with the catalogue’s wording or OpenAI’s note, none of them matched in the Lean text: boundary, brennan, conjecture, connected, domain, inverse, means, simply and two more.

Statements in Brennan’s conjecture and sharp inverse-square integral means come first because the Lean file and module names share words with that paper’s title.

Theorem 1.1 of Brennan’s conjecture and sharp inverse-square integral means

Theorem (Brennan’s conjecture and inverse-square means)

For every \varepsilon>0 there is C_\varepsilon<\infty such that

M_{-2}[f'](r)\le C_\varepsilon(1-r)^{-1-\varepsilon} \qquad\left(f\in\SSS,\ \frac12\le r<1\right).

Moreover, B_{\SSS}(-2)=1.

Let W\subset\CC be any simply connected domain whose boundary in the Riemann sphere contains at least two points. Every conformal bijection \varphi:W\to\DD satisfies

\int_W|\varphi'(z)|^s\dd A(z)<\infty \qquad\left(\frac43<s<4\right).

Equivalently, every univalent map f:\DD\to\CC satisfies

\int_{\DD}|f'(w)|^t\dd A(w)<\infty \qquad\left(-2<t<\frac23\right).
Section 1, Introduction Read it in the paper TeX source, line 52
Show the TeX
For every $\varepsilon>0$ there is $C_\varepsilon<\infty$ such that
\begin{equation}
 M_{-2}[f'](r)\le C_\varepsilon(1-r)^{-1-\varepsilon}
 \qquad\left(f\in\SSS,\ \frac12\le r<1\right).
\end{equation}
Moreover, $B_{\SSS}(-2)=1$.

Let $W\subset\CC$ be any simply connected domain whose boundary in
the Riemann sphere contains at least two points. Every conformal
bijection $\varphi:W\to\DD$ satisfies
\[
 \int_W|\varphi'(z)|^s\dd A(z)<\infty
 \qquad\left(\frac43<s<4\right).
\]
Equivalently, every univalent map $f:\DD\to\CC$ satisfies
\[
 \int_{\DD}|f'(w)|^t\dd A(w)<\infty
 \qquad\left(-2<t<\frac23\right).
\]

Other possible paper matches, closest wording first

  • Corollary 1.2 of Brennan’s conjecture and sharp inverse-square integral means. Words of the Lean statement, its names split into words, that also appear in the theorem: koebe, integrability, 2/3, function, 4/3, inverse and one more.
  • Corollary 7.4 of Brennan’s conjecture and sharp inverse-square integral means. Words of the Lean statement, its names split into words, that also appear in the theorem: 4/3, map and domain. Shared only with the release’s name for the Lean statement or OpenAI’s note on it: exponents and boundary.
  • Proposition 5.6 of Brennan’s conjecture and sharp inverse-square integral means. Words of the Lean statement, its names split into words, that also appear in the theorem: map and domain.
  • Proposition 2.4 of Brennan’s conjecture and sharp inverse-square integral means. Words of the Lean statement, its names split into words, that also appear in the theorem: disk.
  • Theorem 1.1 of A strict inverse-first-power bound for univalent functions. Words of the Lean statement, its names split into words, that also appear in the theorem: inverse. Found in the paper’s title, which its main theorem states: functions and univalent.
  • Proposition 4.1 of Brennan’s conjecture and sharp inverse-square integral means. Words of the Lean statement, its names split into words, that also appear in the theorem: area.

How Atlas selects possible matches: it compares words in the Lean statement with every statement in the family. It also splits Lean names into words. The release’s label and note receive less weight; a main theorem wins a close match. If the Lean wording yields no clear match, Atlas uses the catalogue description. This selects passages to compare; it does not establish that they mean the same thing.

Reported Comparator runs

three independent groups report that Comparator accepted runs for this Lean statement file: Carlos Toledo’s cert-machine; MathVet; Neal McBurnett’s openai-math-lean-tooling. Each group reports its own Comparator run for this statement file. Atlas has not repeated the runs.

For a configured theorem, Comparator tests whether OpenAI’s proof proves the exact Lean statement. Some files instead configure definitions for comparison by name and type. Acceptance does not establish that the statement means the same thing as the paper’s theorem.

Carlos Toledo’s cert-machine

How they ran it, in their words

Every Comparator challenge re-run on Linux with nanoda switched on, decided by a preregistered rule; every family’s challenge statements read against OpenAI’s headline, clause by clause. Decider: Comparator (leanprover/comparator d03acab1 = tag v4.34.0, built with the release’s toolchain v4.34.1), lean4export 076e8e57, landrun 811cfff5, nanoda_lib 3a240721 — on GitHub’s Linux runners (.github/workflows/openai-math-kernel.yml), one j…

  • Accepted Their term: “CERTIFIED”.

    Re-run through Comparator with the independent nanoda kernel switched on: Lean’s kernel and nanoda both accept OpenAI’s solution.

    Reported 10 October 2026, at the release version shown here. Original verification report

MathVet

How they ran it, in their words

An independent, model-assisted, pre-referee reading of each family’s challenge statements against its headline claim under a published rubric (PROTOCOL.md), with its own Comparator runs per challenge. Its protocol describes a planned error-rate study; this import does not establish that the study has been completed.

  • Accepted Their term: “comparator-sandboxed-pass”.

    Re-run through Comparator in a sandboxed virtual machine: accepted.

    Reported 8 October 2026, at the release version shown here. Original verification report

Neal McBurnett’s openai-math-lean-tooling

How they ran it, in their words

Each challenge’s solution is built and checked by Comparator at the pinned release, on Lean leanprover/lean4:v4.34.1, recording the verdict, the check time and the peak memory; the run was still in progress at this snapshot (192 accepted, 224 pending).

  • Accepted Their term: “accepted”.

    Re-run through Comparator with Lean’s kernel: accepted (the check took 229 s; peak memory 6.3 GiB).

    Reported 11 October 2026, at the release version shown here. Original verification report

What an accepted Comparator run would establish

If Comparator is run under this configuration and accepts, the solution proves the configured theorem using only the allowed axioms, and the Lean kernel accepts every step.

This configuration lists no definition holes, so every definition the statement uses is compared as it is written in this file.

Allowed axioms: propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound

Acceptance leaves open whether the Lean statement means the same thing as the paper’s theorem, whether the paper’s other claims are correct, and whether the result is new. Those questions require comparing the definitions and statements, reviewing the paper’s arguments, and reading the earlier literature.

Do family 072’s Lean statements express the advertised result?

These assessments compare all the family’s Lean statements with the whole result OpenAI describes in its catalogue. They do not assess this statement alone. Each group uses its own published rules.

MathVet and cert-machine disagree on how much of the advertised result the Lean statements express.

  • MathVet

    Finds the whole advertised result stated or implied Their term: “full”.

    The challenge statements imply the headline claim after unpacking definitions or one routine step. Their record

    Their note: Brennan's conjecture and the strict Kraetzer bound are stated; the sharp spectrum identity B_S(t) = |t|-1 is stated only at t = -2, not for all t <= -2.

    Definitions the group asks readers to compare with the paper: Custom integral-means spectrum: beta f t := limsup_{r→1⁻} log(integralMean f t r) / log(1/(1-r)) and spectrum t := sSup {b | ∃ f, Schlicht f ∧ beta f t = b} in EReal (standard definition, checked); kraetzerPrediction p := if |p| ≤ 2 then p^2/4 else |p| - 1

  • Carlos Toledo’s cert-machine

    Finds part of it stated, or a narrower or weaker statement Their term: “NARROWER — UNDECLARED”.

    The challenge statements state less than the headline, and OpenAI’s Lean note does not say so. Their record

    Their note: The headline claims B_S(t) = |t| − 1 for every t ≤ −2. Lean states it only at t = −2 (Brennan.lean:37). The manuscript states the full range as a corollary (sections/06-integrability.tex:56), so the headline matches the paper and the Lean is narrower by that corollary. Mathematically the gap is a short classical step (B_S(t)+t is nondecreasing by the distortion theorem, and the Koebe function gives the lower bound), but it is not stated.

Read the complete assessments on the family page.

OpenAI’s own note on what this Lean statement covers

“The Koebe map and its inverse give divergence at all four boundary exponents.”

An AI agent drafted an interpretation of that note, classifying this statement as “states a supporting result”. No human review of the draft is recorded.

Supporting material

The complete Lean statement file

44 lines, copied from release version fd4aeeb. A name defined in this file links to its line; pointing at the name shows its definition.

Declared in this fileOpenAI’s library at fd4aeebOther linked names open the current documentation for Mathlib, Lean’s mathematical library.

Links in the file: 19 to its own declarations, 18 to Mathlib’s documentation. 9 declared names also link to the same declaration in OpenAI’s library. OpenAI uses Mathlib version d13f23b. The linked documentation describes the current version, so names that have since changed may be missing there.

import Mathlibnamespace OAInoncomputable sectionopen Set MeasureTheory Filteropen scoped Topology ENNRealnamespace Brennandef disk : Set ℂ := Metric.ball 0 1def UnivalentOn (f : ℂ → ℂ) (U : Set ℂ) : Prop :=  DifferentiableOn ℂ f U ∧ Set.InjOn f Udef Schlicht (f : ℂ → ℂ) : Prop :=  UnivalentOn f disk ∧ f 0 = 0 ∧ deriv f 0 = 1def koebeMap (z : ℂ) : ℂ := z/(1-z)^2namespace Sharpdef koebeDomain : Set ℂ := koebeMap '' diskdef koebeInverse : ℂ → ℂ := Function.invFunOn koebeMap diskdef areaMoment (f : ℂ → ℂ) (U : Set ℂ) (t : ℝ) : ℝ≥0∞ :=  ∫⁻ z in U, ENNReal.ofReal (‖deriv f z‖ ^ t) ∂volumedef SharpEndpointStatement : Prop :=  Schlicht koebeMap ∧  areaMoment koebeMap disk (-2) = ⊤ ∧  areaMoment koebeMap disk (2 / 3) = ⊤ ∧  ¬ IntegrableOn (fun z => ‖deriv koebeInverse z‖ ^ (4 : ℝ)) koebeDomain volume ∧  ¬ IntegrableOn (fun z => ‖deriv koebeInverse z‖ ^ (4 / 3 : ℝ)) koebeDomain volumetheorem sharp_endpoints : SharpEndpointStatement := by  sorryend Sharpend Brennanendend OAI
Every extracted statement of the accompanying papers

The statements the atlas extracted automatically from each accompanying paper’s TeX source, with links to the full sources.

Brennan’s conjecture and sharp inverse-square integral means

Theorem (Brennan’s conjecture and inverse-square means)

For every \varepsilon>0 there is C_\varepsilon<\infty such that

M_{-2}[f'](r)\le C_\varepsilon(1-r)^{-1-\varepsilon} \qquad\left(f\in\SSS,\ \frac12\le r<1\right).

Moreover, B_{\SSS}(-2)=1.

Let W\subset\CC be any simply connected domain whose boundary in the Riemann sphere contains at least two points. Every conformal bijection \varphi:W\to\DD satisfies

\int_W|\varphi'(z)|^s\dd A(z)<\infty \qquad\left(\frac43<s<4\right).

Equivalently, every univalent map f:\DD\to\CC satisfies

\int_{\DD}|f'(w)|^t\dd A(w)<\infty \qquad\left(-2<t<\frac23\right).
Section 1, Introduction Read it in the paper TeX source, line 52
Show the TeX
For every $\varepsilon>0$ there is $C_\varepsilon<\infty$ such that
\begin{equation}
 M_{-2}[f'](r)\le C_\varepsilon(1-r)^{-1-\varepsilon}
 \qquad\left(f\in\SSS,\ \frac12\le r<1\right).
\end{equation}
Moreover, $B_{\SSS}(-2)=1$.

Let $W\subset\CC$ be any simply connected domain whose boundary in
the Riemann sphere contains at least two points. Every conformal
bijection $\varphi:W\to\DD$ satisfies
\[
 \int_W|\varphi'(z)|^s\dd A(z)<\infty
 \qquad\left(\frac43<s<4\right).
\]
Equivalently, every univalent map $f:\DD\to\CC$ satisfies
\[
 \int_{\DD}|f'(w)|^t\dd A(w)<\infty
 \qquad\left(-2<t<\frac23\right).
\]
Corollary (Sharpness of the open range)

The Koebe function f(z)=z/(1-z)^2 belongs to \SSS and satisfies

\int_{\DD}|f'|^{-2}\dd A=\infty, \qquad \int_{\DD}|f'|^{2/3}\dd A=\infty.

Its inverse therefore fails area integrability at both s=4 and s=4/3.

Section 1, Introduction Read it in the paper TeX source, line 82
Show the TeX
The Koebe function $f(z)=z/(1-z)^2$ belongs to $\SSS$ and satisfies
\[
 \int_{\DD}|f'|^{-2}\dd A=\infty,
 \qquad
 \int_{\DD}|f'|^{2/3}\dd A=\infty.
\]
Its inverse therefore fails area integrability at both $s=4$ and $s=4/3$.

A strict inverse-first-power bound for univalent functions

Theorem (Uniform inverse-first-power bound)

There exist constants 0<\varepsilon<1/4 and C<\infty such that

M_{-1}[f'](r)\le C(1-r)^{-1/4+\varepsilon} \qquad\text{for every }f\in\SSS\text{ and every }1/2\le r<1.

Consequently B_b(-1)<1/4, and Kraetzer’s conjectured identity (eq:kraetzer) is false.

Section 1, Introduction Read it in the paper TeX source, line 44
Show the TeX
There exist constants \(0<\varepsilon<1/4\) and \(C<\infty\) such that
\begin{equation}
 M_{-1}[f'](r)\le C(1-r)^{-1/4+\varepsilon}
 \qquad\text{for every }f\in\SSS\text{ and every }1/2\le r<1.
\end{equation}
Consequently \(B_b(-1)<1/4\), and Kraetzer's conjectured identity
\eqref{eq:kraetzer} is false.
Configuration and file facts
OpenAI’s Lean catalogue
OpenAI lists this as a main result in its Lean catalogue.
Allowed axioms
propext, Classical.choice, Quot.soundThe axioms this configuration allows a proof to use. A replay shows which of them a proof uses.
Imports
Mathlib
Imports from outside Mathlib
None
Local vocabulary
8 local vocabulary declarations
Lines of Lean, without comments or blank lines
18
Second proof-verification program (nanoda)
Off in OpenAI's configuration.

Statement comparison

A shareable summary of this page: the proposed paper match, what the Lean statement expresses, and which reviews are recorded.

Plectis Atlas

Sharp endpoint divergence

Family 072: Brennan’s conjecture and the integral-means spectrum

Candidate pairing

Theorem (Brennan’s conjecture and inverse-square means)

For every \varepsilon>0 there is C_\varepsilon<\infty such that

M_{-2}[f'](r)\le C_\varepsilon(1-r)^{-1-\varepsilon} \qquad\left(f\in\SSS,\ \frac12\le r<1\right).

Moreover, B_{\SSS}(-2)=1.

Let W\subset\CC be any simply connected domain whose boundary in the Riemann sphere contains at least two points. Every conformal bijection \varphi:W\to\DD satisfies

\int_W|\varphi'(z)|^s\dd A(z)<\infty \qquad\left(\frac43<s<4\right).

Equivalently, every univalent map f:\DD\to\CC satisfies

\int_{\DD}|f'(w)|^t\dd A(w)<\infty \qquad\left(-2<t<\frac23\right).

Brennan’s conjecture and sharp inverse-square integral means

TeX label thm:main, build/sections/00-introduction.tex, line 52

The Lean statement says

def SharpEndpointStatement : Prop :=  Schlicht koebeMap ∧  areaMoment koebeMap disk (-2) = ⊤ ∧  areaMoment koebeMap disk (2 / 3) = ⊤ ∧  ¬ IntegrableOn (fun z => ‖deriv koebeInverse z‖ ^ (4 : ℝ)) koebeDomain volume ∧  ¬ IntegrableOn (fun z => ‖deriv koebeInverse z‖ ^ (4 / 3 : ℝ)) koebeDomain volumetheorem sharp_endpoints : SharpEndpointStatement := by  sorry

A Lean statement states the theorem and leaves its proof as sorry on purpose. OpenAI’s proof is in a separate solution module, and a program called Comparator checks that proof against this statement.

Atlas selected this possible match because the two statements share words. No review of whether they mean the same thing is recorded.three independent groups report that Comparator accepted runs for this file at the release version shown here.Statement review: none recorded

8 local vocabulary declarationsAllowed axioms: propext, Classical.choice, Quot.soundopenai/math at fd4aeebwcook04.github.io/plectis-atlas/statements/BrennanSharp.html

Recorded comparisons with the paper

Atlas records no contributed comparison of this statement with the paper.

Contributed Comparator run reports

Atlas records no contributed report of running Comparator for this statement file.

Questions to resolve when comparing this statement with the paper

  • Two independent readers, MathVet and cert-machine, disagree on whether this family's challenges state its headline; a specialist reading would settle it.

Compare this statement with the paperShare a Comparator run reportSuggest a change