1 Introduction
A holomorphic vector bundle E on a projective variety is ample when the tautological quotient line bundle \OO_{\PP(E)}(1) is ample; here \PP(E) parametrizes one-dimensional quotients [12, Proposition 3.2]. A smooth Hermitian metric is strictly Griffiths-positive if its Chern curvature is positive in every pair of nonzero tangent and fiber directions. Such a metric implies ampleness. Griffiths’ conjecture asks for the converse on smooth complex projective varieties [11, Problem (0.9)].
Set
where p_1,p_2:S\to\PP^1 are the projections, and \OO_S(r,s)=p_1^*\OO_{\PP^1}(r)\otimes p_2^*\OO_{\PP^1}(s). Let f_m:S\to S raise the homogeneous coordinates in each factor to their mth powers. Thus \deg f_m=m^2 and f_m^*P\simeq P^m.
Theorem 1.1. There is an algebraic vector bundle G of rank two on S such that, for every positive integer m, the bundle
is ample. There is an integer m_0 such that E_m admits no smooth Hermitian metric with strictly Griffiths-positive Chern curvature for every m\ge m_0.
The bundle G is given explicitly in Section 2. The ampleness assertion has a quantitative certificate: Proposition 3.1 proves that \OO_{\PP(E_m)}(n) is very ample for every even n with n-1\geq3m. The threshold m_0 is obtained by compactness and is ineffective. Thus Griffiths’ conjecture fails in rank two on the quadric surface.
Historical context and related results
Hartshorne developed the algebraic theory of ample vector bundles through symmetric powers, global generation, and the tautological line bundle [12]. Griffiths’ original question used the term “cohomologically positive”; his definition of “ample” in that article included a first-jet generation condition [11, Definitions (0.2)–(0.3), Problem (0.9)]. The conjecture above is the modern formulation of that question. Its significance is the proposed passage from algebraic positivity to a Hermitian curvature condition on the bundle itself, which can then enter differential-geometric vanishing arguments.
For line bundles the algebraic and curvature notions agree [26, Proposition 1.15]. On complex curves, Hartshorne characterized ampleness by positivity of the degrees of all nonzero quotient bundles [13, Theorem 2.4]. Umemura proved the metric equivalence first for elliptic curves and then for compact Riemann surfaces [25, 26]; see in particular [26, Theorem 2.6] and the later work of Campana–Flenner [3]. These results make a surface the first possible base dimension for the phenomenon in Theorem 1.1.
Several positive results recover strong curvature after modifying the bundle. Nakano positivity is a stronger curvature condition than Griffiths positivity. Berndtsson proved Nakano positivity of E\otimes\det E for ample E through direct-image curvature [1, Theorem 1.3]. Liu–Sun–Yang established Nakano and dual-Nakano positivity for determinant-twisted symmetric powers and for sufficiently large symmetric powers of ample bundles [16, Theorems 1.1–1.2 and Corollary 1.3]. The determinant twists and symmetric powers are part of these conclusions; they do not supply a Griffiths-positive metric on E itself.
Analytic approaches to that remaining question include Demailly’s Hermitian–Yang–Mills system and subsequent curvature functionals [5, 6]. Pingali identified a limitation of the initial system and solved a related system for direct sums of ample line bundles on Riemann surfaces [21, 22]. Murakami subsequently obtained an analytic proof of the full curve case through the Demailly system [19, Theorem 1.2]. These developments concern smooth Hermitian metrics and clarify the analytic difficulty of recovering them from ampleness.
The requirement that the metric be Hermitian is essential to the problem. Kobayashi characterized ampleness of E by negatively curved strongly pseudoconvex complex Finsler structures on E^* [14, Theorems 4.1 and 5.1]. His term “convex” means positivity of the complex fiber Hessian of the squared metric [14, Section 2]. Their squared norms are homogeneous of degree two but need not be Hermitian quadratics in the fiber variable. More recently, Lempert showed that an equivariant fiberwise rule applied to a prescribed positive tautological metric can fail to produce even a semipositive Hermitian metric [15, Theorem 2.1]. His examples are direct sums of a positive line bundle and also carry positive Hermitian metrics. That result identifies an obstruction to the specified construction rule; the obstruction below concerns every smooth strictly positive metric on the indicated bundles.
In a preprint posted on September 22, 2026, Du–Xie state the existence of a rank-two ample bundle on the abelian surface C\times C, where C is the elliptic curve y^2=x^3-x, without a smooth Griffiths-semipositive metric [7, Theorem 1.1]. Their accompanying preprint gives a first-jet characterization of Griffiths positivity in terms of an adjoint-Levi obstruction [8, Theorem 1.1]. The construction here is on the rational quadric and supplies a specified power-map family, an all-m ampleness certificate, and the general limiting statement of Proposition 4.1. Its metric conclusion is the absence of smooth strictly Griffiths-positive metrics for all sufficiently large m.
A subsequent preprint of Liu–Wan, posted on September 29, 2026, states the existence of ample rank-two bundles on every Hirzebruch surface, including \PP^1\times\PP^1, that are slope-stable with respect to suitable ample polarizations and admit no smooth strongly pseudoconvex Finsler metric of semipositive Kobayashi curvature [17, Theorem 1.1]. That curvature condition is imposed on the original bundle; Kobayashi’s ampleness characterization above uses negative curvature on its dual. The result concerns a different construction and a stronger metric exclusion than the strict Hermitian conclusion proved here.
Proof strategy
Compatible graph identifications. Choose two projective transformations A,B of \PP^1 with order three and no common fixed point, such that AB is conjugate to z\mapsto\lambda z with |\lambda|>1. Their chosen linear lifts, and the relative lift A^{-1}B, have finite order. The two properties serve different purposes: finite relative orders allow line maps to agree at graph intersections, whereas the expanding product will prevent a common invariant measure. For M\in\{I,A,B\} put \Gamma_M=\{(x,Mx):x\in\PP^1\} and D=\Gamma_I\cup\Gamma_A\cup\Gamma_B. For a suitable common multiple b of the finite lift orders, set L_1=\OO_S(b,0) and L_2=\OO_S(0,b). The lifted maps identify L_1^{-1}|_D with L_2^{-1}|_D; duality gives a corresponding identification of L_1|_D and L_2|_D. Define G by the pairs of local sections of L_1\oplus L_2 that agree under this identification on D. This is an elementary transformation in the sense of [18, Introduction, (0.1)]. Section 2 checks compatibility at every node, local freeness, and the two line-bundle quotients of G. Their dual line subbundles in F=G^\vee span away from D and coincide over D according to the prescribed lifted transformations.
Ampleness from the two quotients. The two quotient sequences give two filtrations of symmetric powers. The product of the two kernel line bundles is positive in both rulings. Alternating the sequences groups the negative twists into powers of this product; each remaining quotient loses at most one additional copy of the graph divisor. After pullback by f_m, twisting \Sym^n(f_m^*G) by P^{n-1} offsets that loss for sufficiently large even n. The line factors are then globally generated and have vanishing first cohomology. Section 3 lifts their sections through the filtration. A relative Veronese map, the base embedding supplied by one further factor P, and a Segre embedding then give the stated very-ampleness certificate. This follows the symmetric-power framework of [12], while using the two quotients separately also where their kernels coincide.
A nonzero quadratic limit. Suppose that infinitely many E_m have positive metrics. Their dual squared norms are plurisubharmonic. Average these norms over f_m, using a local mth root of a pulled-back twisting frame to absorb the factor P. Each average remains a Hermitian quadratic; the twisting transition factor tends to one as m\to\infty. After a scalar normalization, the coefficient matrices are locally uniformly bounded. Proposition 4.1 produces a finite, nonnegative, nonzero plurisubharmonic function q on F, quadratic on every fiber. Convolution of negative singular Hermitian metrics is developed in [2, 23, 20]. Here noncollapse and the assertion on every fiber require separate arguments: the graph relations lie over a divisor and cannot be read from an almost-everywhere representative.
Incompatible invariances. Restricting q to either line subbundle makes its squared seminorm independent of the other \PP^1 coordinate, by the maximum principle. The graph relations give a single nonzero squared seminorm on \OO_{\PP^1}(-b), invariant under the lifts of A and B. Total-space plurisubharmonicity and quadratic fiber dependence imply subharmonicity of the logarithmic weights. Applying i\partial\bar\partial to them gives a positive measure whose nonzero total mass is fixed by the degree -b, even when the seminorm has zeros. Invariance under AB forces this measure to be supported on its two fixed points. Both A and B preserve this nonempty support. Since a permutation of at most two points whose order divides three is trivial, each would fix every support point, giving a common fixed point. Section 5 proves this contradiction, and Section 6 assembles the theorem.
Conventions and notation
For a vector bundle V, \PP(V) parametrizes one-dimensional quotients, and \OO_{\PP(V)}(1) is the tautological quotient line. The projective line \PP^1 used to describe the graph transformations is also identified with the lines in \CC^2; its tautological subbundle is \OO_{\PP^1}(-1).
We use the curvature convention of [5]. At a point, in local coordinates and a frame orthonormal at that point, write
Strict Griffiths positivity means
The dual has the opposite Griffiths sign. In particular its squared norm is plurisubharmonic on the total bundle; this standard criterion is recalled where it is used. Throughout, “psh” means plurisubharmonic, and \ddc u=i u_{z\bar z}\,dz\wedge d\bar z on a complex curve. A Hermitian quadratic form is allowed to be positive semidefinite when this is stated explicitly.
2 A bundle defined by three graphs
We construct G together with two line-bundle quotients. Their dual inclusions will span away from three graphs and agree on those graphs through specified linear maps. The quotient sequences will prove ampleness; the graph identities will constrain a quadratic limit on G^\vee.
We choose matrices A,B with two different properties. The relative lifts A, B, and A^{-1}B must have finite order, so that their tensor powers agree at graph intersections. The projective actions of A and B will have order three and no common fixed point, while AB will have eigenvalues of distinct moduli. Together these properties will exclude an invariant measure in Section 5. As in the introduction, S=\PP^1\times\PP^1, and we view \PP^1 as the lines in \CC^2, with tautological bundle \OO_{\PP^1}(-1).
Put
We use the same letters for their induced automorphisms of \PP^1.
Lemma 2.1. The matrices A,B belong to \SL_2(\CC) and satisfy
The orders of A, B, and A^{-1}B in \SL_2(\CC) are 6, 6, and 8, respectively. The induced projective orders of A and B are both 3. The matrix AB has two positive real reciprocal eigenvalues of distinct moduli, and A,B have no common eigenline.
Proof. The value of s gives
These identities prove the determinant and trace assertions except for the trace of AB. The characteristic polynomial of each of A,B is t^2-t+1, with roots e^{\pm i\pi/3}, while that of A^{-1}B is t^2+\sqrt2t+1, with roots e^{\pm3i\pi/4}. The roots in each pair are distinct, proving the claimed orders; in particular A^3=B^3=-\Id.
Cayley–Hamilton gives A+A^{-1}=\Id. Multiplication by B and taking traces therefore yield
Since \det(AB)=1, its eigenvalues are positive real reciprocals, one greater than one. Finally, the eigenlines of A are the two coordinate lines, and neither is preserved by B, whose two off-diagonal entries are nonzero.
For M\in\{I,A,B\} let
where D has the reduced structure.
Lemma 2.2. The divisor D has bidegree (3,3) and exactly six singular points, all ordinary transverse intersections of two components. There are no triple intersections.
Proof. Each graph is a smooth divisor of bidegree (1,1). An intersection of \Gamma_M and \Gamma_N corresponds to a fixed point of M^{-1}N, hence to an eigenline of that matrix. The relative matrices are A,B,A^{-1}B or their inverses. Each has two distinct eigenvalues, and the multiplier at either projective fixed point is the ratio of those eigenvalues in one order or the other. This ratio is not one. The fixed points are therefore simple, so each pair of graphs meets transversely at two points. A point on all three graphs would give a common eigenline of A and B, contrary to Lemma 2.1. Thus the six pairwise intersections are distinct. Their local equations are products of two regular parameters, and the asserted description follows.
Set
The exponent 24 is a common multiple of the orders 6,6,8 of the specified relative linear lifts A,B,A^{-1}B. It makes the induced tensor-power maps on the two branches of each graph intersection agree on their common fiber, as used in the descent argument below.
Along \Gamma_M, the map M on tautological lines induces an isomorphism from L_1^{-1} to L_2^{-1} by taking its b-th tensor power.
Proposition 2.3. These three isomorphisms glue to an algebraic isomorphism
Let \beta=(\alpha^\vee)^{-1}:L_1|_D\to L_2|_D and define
Then G is an algebraic vector bundle of rank two. Both projections \rho_i:G\to L_i are surjective, with exact sequences
For F=G^\vee, the dual inclusions \iota_i=\rho_i^\vee:L_i^{-1}\hookrightarrow F span each fiber over S\setminus D and satisfy
Proof. The bundle will be an elementary transformation of L_1\oplus L_2 along the effective Cartier divisor D, as in [18, Introduction, (0.1)]. We verify the gluing and the local basis directly, since the resulting quotient maps are needed in both subsequent arguments.
At a point of \Gamma_M\cap\Gamma_N, let v span the first-coordinate line. For some eigenvalue \lambda of M^{-1}N we have Nv=\lambda Mv. By Lemma 2.1, \lambda^{24}=1. Consequently
Thus the two maps agree as maps of the actual line fibers. This also covers the reversed pair, for which the eigenvalue is \lambda^{-1}.
We check descent at a node. If R is the local ring of S there and (x),(y) are the branch ideals, transversality gives (x)\cap(y)=(xy) and the exact sequence
whose last map is the difference of the residue values. Tensoring this sequence by the locally free rank-one sheaf \operatorname{Hom}(L_1^{-1},L_2^{-1})|_D shows that the equal fiber values are precisely the compatibility needed to descend the two branch sections. Their common value is nonzero, so the descended scalar is a unit in the nodal local ring. The component maps therefore glue to the isomorphism (2.3).
Near a point of D, choose frames of L_1,L_2 and a local equation d of D. The scalar defining \beta modulo d lifts, after shrinking, to a regular unit h. In these frames the module (2.4) has basis
Indeed, every element has a unique expression u_1e+kf, since u_2-hu_1 is divisible by the non-zero-divisor d. Away from D the sheaf is simply L_1\oplus L_2, proving local freeness everywhere.
The first projection maps e to 1, and the second maps e to the unit h, so both are surjective. Setting the j-th coordinate equal to zero in (2.4) identifies its kernel with L_i(-D), proving (2.5). Their duals are line subbundles of F, and away from D they span. On D, if v\in L_1^{-1} and (u_1,u_2)\in G, then
because \alpha^\vee\beta=\Id. This is (2.6).
For a positive integer m, define
This is finite of degree m^2, and f_m^*\OO_S(r,t)\simeq\OO_S(mr,mt). In particular, f_m^*P\simeq P^{\otimes m}. The bundles in the theorem are
3 Ampleness of every member of the family
For each m, we construct enough symmetric-power sections to embed \PP(E_m). The two quotient sequences are used alternately: their kernels individually have one negative degree, but their tensor product is positive in both rulings. The resulting filtration gives an explicit very-ampleness range within Hartshorne’s symmetric-power framework [12, Corollary 2.5 and Proposition 3.2].
Proposition 3.1. For every positive integer m, the bundle E_m=f_m^*G\otimes P is ample. More precisely, \OO_{\PP(E_m)}(n) is very ample for every even integer n with n-1\geq3m.
Proof. Fix m and write
Pullback of (2.5) gives
These sequences remain exact because their original quotients are locally free. Here
and hence
We write powers of line bundles for tensor powers throughout this proof.
Alternating the quotient sequences. For an extension 0\to K'\to V'\to L'\to0 with K',L' line bundles, multiplication gives
Indeed, a local splitting gives a kernel generator k' and a lift e' of a quotient generator. The monomials containing k' form the kernel of the symmetric quotient, and the remaining monomial (e')^r maps to a quotient generator. This is the usual symmetric-power filtration of an extension; compare the proof of [12, Corollary 3.4].
Apply this construction first to V\to\widetilde L_2 and then to V\to\widetilde L_1. For r\geq2 it gives
Thus each pair of steps leaves the residual bundle K\otimes\Sym^{r-2}V, with one line-bundle quotient at each step. For even n, iteration gives a filtration of \Sym^nV with line factors
Indeed, after j pairs the residual bundle is K^j\otimes\Sym^{n-2j}V, whose second quotient is K^jK_1\widetilde L_1^{\,n-2j-1} =K^j\widetilde L_1^{\,n-2j}(-\widetilde D). Only the second quotient contains an additional twist by -\widetilde D beyond the factors absorbed into K^j.
Each step uses just one of the locally split sequences (3.1), so it remains valid when the two kernel lines have the same fiber image. Concretely, in the pulled-back basis e,f of (2.7), the kernels are generated by k=de-hf and f, with h a unit. For n=2 the filtration is
Since e,k are also a basis of V, the module kV has basis ke,k^2 and is a direct summand of \Sym^2V, with complement generated by e^2. Moreover,
The coefficient -1/h is a unit, so kf extends to a basis of kV. Both inclusions therefore have locally free quotients. This verification uses no smoothness of d=0 and applies at nodes and to nonreduced pullbacks of the divisor.
Global generation after twisting. Choose n even with n-1\geq3m, and set
By (3.2), the bidegrees of its filtration factors, in the order of (3.5), are
Every entry is nonnegative: the only possibly negative contribution is -3m, and it is offset by n-1.
For c,t\geq0, products of homogeneous monomials generate \OO_S(c,t). Moreover H^1(\PP^1,\OO(c))=H^1(\PP^1,\OO(t))=0, as computed on the two standard affine charts, so the Künneth formula gives H^1(S,\OO_S(c,t))=0 [24, Tags 01XD and 0BED]. If 0\to U\to Z\to Q\to0 is an extension of globally generated bundles with H^1(S,U)=H^1(S,Q)=0, the cohomology sequence gives H^1(S,Z)=0 and lifts every global section of Q to Z. The lifted generators of Q, together with generators of U, span each fiber of Z. Starting with the innermost line factor and applying this observation successively proves that W is globally generated.
The projective embedding and its line bundle. We record the tautological twists in the quotient-projectivization and Segre constructions [24, Tags 01OA, 01N1, and 01WD]. Let \pi:\PP(V)\to S and H=H^0(S,W). Evaluation H\otimes\OO_S\to W induces a closed immersion
whose projective hyperplane line pulls back to \OO_{\PP(W)}(1). The relative Veronese closed immersion \PP(V)\to\PP(\Sym^n V) sends a quotient line \ell to \ell^{\otimes n}. Under the natural identification \PP(\Sym^n V)\simeq\PP(W), its tautological pullback is
Consequently their composition embeds \PP(V) into \PP(H)\times S with this hyperplane pullback from the first factor. Embedding S by P=\OO_S(1,1) and then applying the Segre embedding gives a closed immersion into projective space whose hyperplane line pulls back to
This line is therefore very ample. Finally, \PP(E_m)=\PP(V\otimes P)\simeq\PP(V) identifies \OO_{\PP(E_m)}(1) with \OO_{\PP(V)}(1)\otimes\pi^*P, proving the proposition.
4 A necessary quadratic limit
The power maps allow the fixed twist by P to disappear in a limit. We prove that the quadratic structure survives at every base point, even where a raw pointwise limit need not be plurisubharmonic. The argument has four steps: trace the dual norms, normalize and extract their coefficient limit, prove that the limit is nonzero, and recover its intrinsic plurisubharmonic representative. We establish this statement for an arbitrary vector bundle on S.
Proposition 4.1. Let G be a holomorphic vector bundle of positive rank on S=\PP^1\times\PP^1, and put F=G^\vee. Suppose that f_m^*G\otimes P admits a smooth strictly Griffiths-positive Hermitian metric for infinitely many positive integers m. Then there is a function
which is plurisubharmonic on the total space, is not identically zero, and has the following property: for every x\in S there is a finite positive semidefinite Hermitian form H_x on F_x such that
In particular, this fiberwise assertion holds at every base point.
Proof. Put r=\operatorname{rank}G. Choose an unbounded sequence of the indicated integers and let \|\cdot\|_m denote the smooth dual metric on
Its squared norm is plurisubharmonic on the total space. We recall the sign in this standard implication. For a smooth Hermitian metric with matrix h, choose a holomorphic frame normal at the point in question, so that h=\Id and its first derivatives vanish there. Along a holomorphic disk with coordinate \zeta, write the Hermitian curvature as iC\,d\zeta\wedge d\bar\zeta. In the convention used here,
at the normal point. Thus, for a holomorphic section s along the disk,
Duality reverses Griffiths positivity, so the second term on the right is nonnegative for the dual metric. Applying this calculation to the section of the pulled-back bundle defined by any disk in its total space proves the assertion. For this classical norm criterion and duality, see [26, Remark 1.3 and Lemma 1.7] and [23, Section 2]; the same implication is recorded in [9, Proposition 2.6].
Trace quadratics and normalization. Fix, for each m, the holomorphic isomorphism f_m^*P^{-1}\simeq P^{-m}. If t is a nonvanishing holomorphic frame of P^{-1} on an open set U\subset S, define on F|_U
where the sum counts multiplicities. The root in this expression is local on the source. Indeed, in a local frame s of P^{-1} the section f_m^*t has the form \eta(y)s^m, with \eta holomorphic and nowhere zero. A local holomorphic logarithm of \eta gives the root \exp((\log\eta)/m)s. Two choices differ by an m-th root of unity, which does not change the squared norm. The expression (4.2) is consequently well defined and is a positive definite Hermitian quadratic in v.
We verify its regularity through the branch locus. Off that locus, every local inverse branch of f_m gives a holomorphic map
into f_m^*F\otimes P^{-1}. Hence each summand, and their sum, is plurisubharmonic. The unordered multiset of roots of y^m=x varies continuously with x, counting coalescing roots with their multiplicities. Applied in the two factors, and using local source frames for the norm in (4.2), this proves continuity of the sum across the branch locus, including a crossing of its two components.
The continuous trace is plurisubharmonic across the branch locus as well. In a local total-space chart, the inverse image of the branch locus under the bundle projection F|_U\to U is an analytic set, contained in \{z_1z_2=0\} after choosing affine coordinates on the two base factors. It is therefore pluripolar. The trace is locally bounded above there by continuity, so the removable-singularities theorem for plurisubharmonic functions [4, Chapter I, Theorem 5.24] gives a unique plurisubharmonic extension. Its upper-limit values agree with the continuous trace. This proves joint plurisubharmonicity of q_{m,t} on all of F|_U.
If t'=gt is another nonvanishing frame, then
Choose smooth background Hermitian norms |\cdot|_0 on F and P^{-1}. By (4.3), the continuous quadratic
is globally defined. We use N_m to normalize the traces globally; the local functions q_{m,t} retain the plurisubharmonicity used below. The background unit sphere bundle is compact, and N_m is positive there. Multiplying the dual metric’s squared norm by a positive constant, we may therefore arrange
This rescaling does not change the curvature. Homogeneity gives
A measurable coefficient limit. In a holomorphic trivialization of F|_U, write
On each relatively compact subset of U, the positive matrices H_m are uniformly bounded, by (4.5). Weak compactness in L^2 and a diagonal subsequence on a countable collection of charts and compact exhaustions give distributional limits H for all the coefficient matrices. These limits belong to L^\infty_{\mathrm{loc}}, are Hermitian, and are positive semidefinite almost everywhere. For example, positivity and the same local upper bound pass to c^*Hc against every nonnegative test function for each c\in(\mathbb Q+i\mathbb Q)^r; density then gives the matrix inequalities on a single set of full measure.
The coefficient limits have the untwisted transition law of a form on F. More explicitly, let v=T(x)w be a holomorphic change of bundle coordinates and let t'=gt. The original matrices satisfy
On a compact subset K of the overlap, the error obtained by deleting the scalar factor has, against a smooth compactly supported matrix test function \Phi, the bound
Here the local matrix bound and the boundedness of T are absorbed into C_K. Multiplication by the fixed smooth matrices T,T^* preserves distributional convergence, as does a change of base coordinates. Consequently H'=T^*HT almost everywhere.
Nonvanishing of the measurable limit. The limiting measurable form is not zero. Choose maximizing unit vectors (x_m,v_m) in (4.4). After a further subsequence they converge in the compact unit sphere bundle to (x_*,v_*). This further subsequence retains all the distributional limits already obtained. In one fixed coordinate and frame chart around x_*, let c_m\to c be their fiber coordinates. Then c\ne0, and a local operator bound \|H_m\|\le C gives
On the other hand,
since the norm of the nonvanishing frame is bounded above and away from zero on a fixed compact neighborhood. Thus the nonnegative plurisubharmonic function u_m(x)=c^*H_m(x)c satisfies u_m(x_m)\ge\tfrac12 for large m. Choose \varrho>0 so that B(x_*,4\varrho) lies in the coordinate chart, and choose a fixed smooth nonnegative function \chi supported in B(x_*,3\varrho) and equal to one on B(x_*,2\varrho). For all sufficiently large m, the ball B(x_m,\varrho) lies in that latter ball. The submean inequality yields
The left side is a pairing against the fixed smooth matrix test function \chi cc^*, so the inequality passes to H. It proves that H is nonzero as a measurable form.
A quadratic psh representative on every fiber. The measurable form is defined only up to a set of measure zero in the base. Even a pointwise limit of the traces may fail to be plurisubharmonic: in one base variable, tracing (1+|y|^2)|v|^2 through x=y^m gives
Its pointwise limit has coefficient 1 at x=0 and 2 elsewhere, whereas its plurisubharmonic representative has coefficient 2 everywhere. We now recover the intrinsic plurisubharmonic representative of our measurable form and show that it remains a Hermitian quadratic on every fiber.
Convolution regularization of negative singular Hermitian metrics appears in [2, Section 3, Proposition 3.1] and [23, Proposition 1.3(i)]; the use of polarization to recover an everywhere-defined representative is also discussed in [20, Remark 2.2.3]. We supply the argument for the present possibly rank-deficient limit, including the compatibility of the representatives on overlaps. Work in a coordinate and bundle chart U, and let \rho be a nonnegative smooth radial function on \CC^2, supported in the unit ball and of integral one. Put
on the interior domain where this convolution is defined. Convolving H_m in the same way gives
It is plurisubharmonic jointly in (x,v), since each base translation (x,v)\mapsto(x-y,v) is holomorphic and the average has nonnegative weights. For fixed \delta, distributional convergence of H_m implies convergence of the convolved coefficients and all their derivatives at every interior point: these are pairings against translates of derivatives of the fixed smooth kernel. The Levi matrices of q_{m,\delta} therefore converge pointwise to that of q_\delta. Hence q_\delta is smooth and plurisubharmonic, and on each smaller chart
for all sufficiently small \delta.
These quadratics decrease as \delta decreases. To check this for any fixed nonnegative radial kernel, write \rho(y)=\phi(|y|) and let M_u(x,s) denote the spherical mean of a subharmonic function u on \RR^4. Polar coordinates give
The spherical mean is nondecreasing in its radius. The integration weight in (4.8) is nonnegative and does not depend on \delta, so the convolution is nondecreasing in \delta. Apply this to u(x)=q_{m,t}(x,v) for each constant v, then pass to the limit in m at two fixed radii. It follows that
in the order of Hermitian forms.
Thus q_\delta decreases, as \delta\downarrow0, to a finite nonnegative plurisubharmonic function q_U on the total-space chart. The decreasing-limit assertion follows also by passing to the submean inequalities; see [4, Chapter I, Theorem 5.4]. Finiteness is supplied by (4.7). At every fixed base point x, this limit is a Hermitian quadratic. Indeed, all entries of H_\delta(x) are determined by the finite set of values at e_j, e_j+e_k, and e_j+i e_k, through
Each value on the right has a finite limit. Hence the entries converge to one Hermitian matrix \widehat H_U(x), and passage to the finite quadratic polynomial gives
This matrix is positive semidefinite at every x, by nonnegativity. At almost every x, approximate-identity convergence also gives \widehat H_U(x)=H(x).
Finally these local representatives agree on overlaps. After the holomorphic change of bundle coordinates, their measurable matrices agree outside a base-null set, by the transition law already proved. The quadratic functions therefore agree for every fiber vector outside that set, hence almost everywhere in the total-space chart by Fubini’s theorem. Both functions are locally bounded and plurisubharmonic. Such a function is determined everywhere by its almost-everywhere values: the submean inequality and upper semicontinuity give, in local Euclidean coordinates,
Thus the local q_U glue to a single function q on F. Its coefficients represent the original measurable form almost everywhere, so (4.6) implies q\not\equiv0. All the required pointwise and plurisubharmonic properties now hold.
Remark 4.2. The function in Proposition 4.1 represents a distributional limit; no convergence of restrictions to a divisor is asserted. The graph identities will instead be evaluated directly in this single everywhere-defined function q.
5 The invariant measure obstruction
We now exclude the quadratic function produced by Proposition 4.1 for the graph-defined bundle G. The two rulings and the three graph identities force a nonzero squared seminorm on \OO_{\PP^1}(-b) that is invariant under the lifts of A and B. We then turn that seminorm into a positive measure of mass 2\pi b and show that the two transformations cannot preserve such a measure.
5.1 From the two rulings to one invariant seminorm
Lemma 5.1. Let G be the bundle of Proposition 2.3, and put F=G^\vee. Suppose that q:F\to[0,\infty) is finite, plurisubharmonic, not identically zero, and a Hermitian quadratic form on every fiber. Then there is a finite, nonnegative, nonzero plurisubharmonic function a_\bullet on \OO_{\PP^1}(-b), a Hermitian positive semidefinite quadratic on each fiber, such that
for every x\in\PP^1 and v\in\OO(-b)_x.
Proof. Write q(x,v)=H_x(v,v); nonnegativity says that every H_x is positive semidefinite. Pull q back by the line inclusions
For fixed x_i\in\PP^1 and v\in\OO(-b)_{x_i}, the function obtained by holding v fixed while varying the other base coordinate is finite and subharmonic on the complementary \PP^1. It is constant by the maximum principle. Consequently q\circ\iota_i descends to a finite nonnegative squared seminorm a_i on \OO_{\PP^1}(-b) over the i-th factor. Fixing any point in the other factor realizes a_i as a holomorphic pullback of q, so a_i is plurisubharmonic on the total line bundle.
On \Gamma_M, the identity \iota_2\alpha=\iota_1 from Proposition 2.3 and the definition of \alpha give
The case M=\Id identifies a_1 and a_2 as a single function a_\bullet on \OO(-b). This function is not identically zero. Indeed, if it were zero, then for every x\notin D, the form H_x would vanish on each of two spanning lines. The inequality
would then force H_x=0. Hence q would vanish on the full-measure complement of the inverse image of D in F. Nonnegativity and the submean inequality on small total-space coordinate balls would give q=0 everywhere, a contradiction.
The cases M=A,B of (5.1) give the asserted invariances under the holomorphic lifts A^{\otimes b} and B^{\otimes b}.
5.2 Logarithmic weights and their measure
The seminorm in Lemma 5.1 may vanish in some fibers. The next lemma shows that its logarithmic weights still define a positive measure with the mass dictated by the negative line bundle. This is the rank-one squared-norm/logarithmic-norm principle from singular Hermitian metric theory [2, Section 3] and [23, Definition 1.2 and Section 2]. We prove local integrability at zeros before taking distributional curvature, so all possible atoms remain in the mass calculation.
Lemma 5.2 (Logarithmic curvature of a squared seminorm). Let L be a holomorphic line bundle on a connected Riemann surface C. Suppose that a_\bullet:L\to[0,\infty) is finite, plurisubharmonic, and not identically zero, and that its restriction to every fiber is a Hermitian positive semidefinite quadratic form. In a nonvanishing holomorphic frame e on U\subset C, write
Then \log u_e, with the value -\infty allowed, is subharmonic and locally integrable. The local measures \ddc\log u_e define a positive Radon measure \mu on C.
If a holomorphic bundle automorphism \widetilde T:L\to L covers an automorphism T:C\to C and satisfies a_\bullet\circ\widetilde T=a_\bullet, then T^*\mu=\mu. If C=\PP^1 and L=\OO_{\PP^1}(-b) with b\geq1, then
Where u_e is smooth and strictly positive, \ddc\log u_e is the negative of the Chern curvature of the corresponding metric in our convention. This accounts for the positive mass when L=\OO(-b).
Proof. Fix a coordinate disk U and a frame e, and abbreviate u_e to u. The function u is finite, nonnegative, subharmonic, and locally bounded, by restriction to the holomorphic section e. Choose a nonnegative smooth radial function \rho supported in the unit disk, with integral one, and put
These functions are defined on the interior of U for sufficiently small \delta>0. Averaging the holomorphic base translations (z,w)\mapsto(z-\zeta,w) shows that (u*\rho_\delta)(z)|w|^2 is plurisubharmonic. Adding \delta|w|^2 preserves this property, so u_\delta>0 and u_\delta(z)|w|^2 is smooth and plurisubharmonic. Its Levi matrix at w=1 is
Its nonnegative determinant gives
Thus f_\delta:=\log u_\delta is subharmonic.
The radial convolutions are nonnegative weighted averages of circular means of u. These means increase with their radii, and converge to u as the radii tend to zero. Consequently
We establish local integrability before taking distributional derivatives of the limit. Suppose that u(z_0)>0, and choose R>0 with \overline{B(z_0,R)}\subset U. For all sufficiently small \delta, local boundedness supplies a constant C_0\geq0 such that f_\delta\leq C_0 on this disk. Moreover f_\delta(z_0)\geq\log u(z_0). Integrating the circular submean inequality over the radius gives
Writing f^-:=\max\{-f,0\}, we obtain the explicit bound
The negative parts increase as \delta decreases, whereas the positive parts are bounded by C_0. Monotone convergence therefore proves \log u\in L^1(B(z_0,R)). It also gives f_\delta\to\log u in L^1 on this disk.
This conclusion propagates throughout C. Indeed, let \Omega consist of the points near which a local logarithmic weight is integrable. A frame change e'=g e gives
so \Omega is independent of the chosen frame. It is open and nonempty: nontriviality of a_\bullet supplies a point with u>0, to which (5.3) applies. If x is in the boundary of \Omega, choose a coordinate disk containing \overline{B(x,4r)}. There is a small open disk contained in \Omega\cap B(x,r). On that disk integrability of \log u implies u>0 almost everywhere, so it contains a point z_0 with u(z_0)>0. The disk B(z_0,2r) has closure in the original chart and contains a neighborhood of x. Applying (5.3) on this larger disk proves x\in\Omega. Thus \Omega is also closed, and connectedness gives \Omega=C.
On every relatively compact disk, C_0-f_\delta increases to the integrable function C_0-\log u. Hence the local convergence is in L^1, and the decreasing limit \log u is subharmonic. In particular, \ddc\log u is a positive distribution and thus a positive Radon measure. Since g in (5.4) is holomorphic and nowhere zero, \log|g|^2 is harmonic. The local measures therefore glue to \mu.
For the invariance assertion, choose frames e on U and e' on V with T(U)\subset V, and write
where c is holomorphic and nowhere zero. The isometry condition gives
Taking distributional \ddc, which commutes with pullback by the holomorphic diffeomorphism T, gives \mu=T^*\mu. Here pullback is that of a top-degree current: for a test function \varphi,
Equivalently, (T^*\mu)(E)=\mu(T(E)) for Borel sets E. This is ordinary measure invariance under the bijection T; in particular, T^*\delta_p=\delta_{T^{-1}p} with unchanged atom mass.
Finally suppose C=\PP^1 and L=\OO(-b). Let h_0 be the smooth Hermitian metric on \OO(-b) induced by the standard norm on \CC^2. In the tautological affine frame e(z)=(1,z)^{\otimes b} its weight is
The local functions \log u_e-\log h_0(e,e) define a single globally integrable function \Phi on \PP^1, by the common frame law. If \mu_0=\ddc\log h_0(e,e), then
The measure \mu is finite because it is locally finite on the compact sphere. With the convention \ddc f=i f_{z\bar z}\,dz\wedge d\bar z, the smooth reference measure has mass
This proves (5.2). Zeros of u_e and any atoms of \mu are included in the distributional calculation; no points have been excised.
5.3 The incompatible invariances
We now use the special dynamics of the two matrices. Concentration of invariant measures on proper projective subsets is a classical mechanism; see [10, Lemma 2 and the proof of Lemma 3]. The following elementary argument gives precisely the rank-two statement needed here.
Lemma 5.3. The projective transformations induced by the matrices A and B in (2.1) preserve no nonzero finite positive Borel measure on \PP^1.
Proof. Suppose that \mu is such a measure. It is invariant under T=AB. The two eigenvalues of AB have distinct moduli, so after a projective change of coordinate T acts as z\mapsto\lambda z with R:=|\lambda|>1. The Borel sets
are pairwise disjoint, cover \CC^*, and satisfy T(C_n)=C_{n+1}. Each has the same measure. Finiteness and positivity imply that this common measure is zero, and countable additivity gives \mu(\CC^*)=0. The half-open annuli assign every boundary circle to exactly one set, so this argument applies equally to atomic and diffuse measures and to nonreal \lambda.
Thus the nonempty support of \mu consists of one or two of the fixed points of T. Invariance under A and B preserves this support as a set: the inverse image of an open neighborhood of the image of a support point has positive measure. Both projective transformations have order three. Their induced permutations on a set of at most two points are therefore trivial. Each point of the support would be fixed by both A and B, and hence would be a common eigenline of the two matrices. Lemma 2.1 excludes such a line.
The preceding results rule out exactly the object supplied by Proposition 4.1.
Proposition 5.4. For the bundle G of Proposition 2.3, every finite nonnegative plurisubharmonic function on the total space of F=G^\vee whose restriction to each fiber is a Hermitian quadratic form is identically zero.
Proof. If such a function were nonzero, Lemma 5.1 would give a nonzero squared seminorm on \OO_{\PP^1}(-b) invariant under the lifts of A and B. Lemma 5.2 would then produce a finite positive measure on \PP^1 of mass 2\pi b>0, invariant under both projective transformations. This contradicts Lemma 5.3.
6 Proof of the main theorem
Proof of Theorem 1.1. Take the algebraic rank-two bundle G of Proposition 2.3. By Proposition 3.1, every E_m=f_m^*G\otimes P is ample in the quotient convention.
If the set of positive integers m for which E_m has a smooth strictly Griffiths-positive metric were infinite, it would contain a sequence tending to infinity. Proposition 4.1 would then give a finite, nonnegative, nonzero psh function on the total space of G^\vee that is a Hermitian positive semidefinite quadratic form on every fiber. Proposition 5.4 excludes precisely such a function. Consequently that set of integers is finite. Choose m_0 larger than all its elements, taking m_0=1 if the set is empty. Every m\ge m_0 gives the required counterexample.
The limit in the proof is permitted to lose rank, but not to vanish identically or to lose its quadratic structure at any base point. These are exactly the properties needed to transfer the graph relations to a nonzero invariant measure. The argument requires no uniform estimates for the input metrics or their curvature, and it does not determine an effective value of m_0.
References
- [1]Bo Berndtsson. Curvature of vector bundles associated to holomorphic fibrations. Annals of Mathematics, 169(2):531–560, 2009. Publisher’s article. https://annals.math.princeton.edu/2009/169-2/p04.
- [2]Bo Berndtsson and Mihai Păun. Bergman kernels and the pseudoeffectivity of relative canonical bundles. Duke Mathematical Journal, 145(2):341–378, 2008. doi:10.1215/00127094-2008-054. doi:10.1215/00127094-2008-054, arXiv:math/0703344.
- [3]Frédéric Campana and Hubert Flenner. A characterization of ample vector bundles on a curve. Mathematische Annalen, 287:571–575, 1990. doi:10.1007/BF01446914. doi:10.1007/BF01446914.
- [4]Jean-Pierre Demailly. Complex Analytic and Differential Geometry. Online manuscript, 2012. Version of 21 June 2012. Manuscript PDF. https://people.math.harvard.edu/~demarco/Math274/Demailly_ComplexAnalyticDiffGeom.pdf.
- [5]Jean-Pierre Demailly. Hermitian–Yang–Mills approach to the conjecture of Griffiths on the positivity of ample vector bundles. Sbornik: Mathematics, 212(3):305–318, 2021. Consulted preprint: arXiv:2002.02677v4 (posted 17 February 2021). doi:10.1070/SM9387, arXiv:2002.02677.
- [6]Jean-Pierre Demailly. Monge–Ampère Functionals for the Curvature Tensor of a Holomorphic Vector Bundle. Analysis Mathematica, 48(2):427–450, 2022. doi:10.1007/s10476-022-0156-4. doi:10.1007/s10476-022-0156-4, arXiv:2112.14463.
- [7]Yun-Heng Du and Song-Yan Xie. Ample vector bundles without Griffiths-semipositive metrics. 2026. Preprint, version 1, September 22, 2026. arXiv:2609.26504. arXiv:2609.26504, https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.26504v1.
- [8]Yun-Heng Du and Song-Yan Xie. A first-jet characterization of Griffiths positivity. 2026. Preprint, version 1, September 22, 2026. arXiv:2609.26528. arXiv:2609.26528, https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.26528v1.
- [9]Franc Forstnerič and Yuta Kusakabe. Oka tubes in holomorphic line bundles. Mathematische Annalen, 391:5265–5292, 2025. doi:10.1007/s00208-024-03051-z. doi:10.1007/s00208-024-03051-z.
- [10]Harry Furstenberg. A note on Borel’s density theorem. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 55(1):209–212, 1976. doi:10.1090/S0002-9939-1976-0422497-X. doi:10.1090/S0002-9939-1976-0422497-X.
- [11]Phillip A. Griffiths. Hermitian differential geometry, Chern classes, and positive vector bundles. In Global Analysis: Papers in Honor of K. Kodaira, pages 185–251, University of Tokyo Press, 1969. Primary scan. https://publications.ias.edu/sites/default/files/hermdiffgeometrychern.pdf.
- [12]Robin Hartshorne. Ample vector bundles. Publications Mathématiques de l’IHÉS, 29:63–94, 1966. doi:10.1007/BF02684806. doi:10.1007/BF02684806.
- [13]Robin Hartshorne. Ample vector bundles on curves. Nagoya Mathematical Journal, 43:73–89, 1971. doi:10.1017/S0027763000014379. doi:10.1017/S0027763000014379.
- [14]Shoshichi Kobayashi. Negative vector bundles and complex Finsler structures. Nagoya Mathematical Journal, 57:153–166, 1975. doi:10.1017/S0027763000016615. doi:10.1017/S0027763000016615.
- [15]László Lempert. On a construction of hermitian metrics on holomorphic vector bundles. 2026. Preprint, version 1, August 31, 2026. arXiv:2609.00326. arXiv:2609.00326, https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.00326v1.
- [16]Kefeng Liu, Xiaofeng Sun, and Xiaokui Yang. Positivity and vanishing theorems for ample vector bundles. Journal of Algebraic Geometry, 22(2):303–331, 2013. doi:10.1090/S1056-3911-2012-00588-8. doi:10.1090/S1056-3911-2012-00588-8, arXiv:1006.1465.
- [17]Kefeng Liu and Xueyuan Wan. Stable ample vector bundles without semipositive Kobayashi curvature. 2026. Preprint, version 1, September 29, 2026. arXiv:2609.37309. arXiv:2609.37309, https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.37309v1.
- [18]Masaki Maruyama. On a generalization of elementary transformations of algebraic vector bundles. Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico, Università e Politecnico di Torino, 44:1–13, 1986. Special issue, published 1987. Primary text. https://seminariomatematico.polito.it/rendiconti/cartaceo/44-4/1.pdf.
- [19]Rei Murakami. An analytic proof of Griffiths’ conjecture on compact Riemann surfaces. Mathematische Annalen, 394, 2026. Article 36. doi:10.1007/s00208-026-03360-5. doi:10.1007/s00208-026-03360-5, arXiv:2509.23201.
- [20]Mihai Păun and Shigeharu Takayama. Positivity of twisted relative pluricanonical bundles and their direct images. Journal of Algebraic Geometry, 27(2):211–272, 2018. doi:10.1090/jag/702. doi:10.1090/jag/702, arXiv:1409.5504.
- [21]Vamsi Pritham Pingali. A note on Demailly’s approach towards a conjecture of Griffiths. Comptes Rendus. Mathématique, 359:501–503, 2021. doi:10.5802/crmath.192. doi:10.5802/crmath.192, arXiv:2102.02496.
- [22]Vamsi Pritham Pingali. The Demailly system for a direct sum of ample line bundles on Riemann surfaces. Calculus of Variations and Partial Differential Equations, 62(6), 2023. Article 172. doi:10.1007/s00526-023-02517-3. doi:10.1007/s00526-023-02517-3, arXiv:2106.05775.
- [23]Hossein Raufi. Singular hermitian metrics on holomorphic vector bundles. Arkiv för Matematik, 53:359–382, 2015. doi:10.1007/s11512-015-0212-4. doi:10.1007/s11512-015-0212-4, arXiv:1211.2948.
- [24]The Stacks Project Authors. The Stacks Project. 2026. Online reference; Tags 01XD, 0BED, 01OA, 01N1, and 01WD. https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/.
- [25]Hiroshi Umemura. Fibrés vectoriels positifs sur une courbe elliptique. Bulletin de la Société Mathématique de France, 100:431–433, 1972. doi:10.24033/bsmf.1746. doi:10.24033/bsmf.1746.
- [26]Hiroshi Umemura. Some results in the theory of vector bundles. Nagoya Mathematical Journal, 52:97–128, 1973. doi:10.1017/S0027763000015919. doi:10.1017/S0027763000015919.