Plectis Atlas
Search

↑ and ↓ move, Enter opens, Esc closes.

Reading view

Vanishing of higher bounded Hochschild cohomology

OpenAI, 23 September 2026

PDFTeX source

Part of family 295: The Kadison–Ringrose cohomology conjecture. Read it with its family

This page is converted from the paper’s TeX source. Atlas reconstructs statement numbers from the paper’s typesetting source (TeX). Use the original PDF if they differ.

Abstract

We prove that every bounded Hochschild cocycle of degree at least two on a complex von Neumann algebra, with values in the algebra itself, has a bounded primitive. Together with the established degree-one inner-derivation theorem, this resolves the Kadison–Ringrose cohomology conjecture positively.

1 Introduction

The continuous Hochschild cohomology of an operator algebra measures the obstruction to solving its bounded cocycle equations. The theory also connects these equations with stability of multiplication under small perturbations [SS95, Chapter 7]. For a von Neumann algebra acting on itself by multiplication, the degree-one equation is the derivation equation, and its vanishing is the inner-derivation theorem of Kadison and Sakai [Kad66, Sak66]. The higher-degree theory was developed by Johnson, Kadison, and Ringrose [KR71a, KR71b, JKR72]. Throughout, boundedness means ordinary operator-norm boundedness of a multilinear map. No complete-boundedness condition is imposed.

For a complex von Neumann algebra M, let C_b^k(M,M) be the Banach space of bounded complex k-linear maps M^k\to M, with norm \norm{f}=\sup_{\norm{a_1},\ldots,\norm{a_k}\leq1} \norm{f(a_1,\ldots,a_k)}, and put C_b^0(M,M)=M. For k\geq1, the differential is

\begin{align*} (df)(a_1,\ldots,a_{k+1}) ={}&a_1f(a_2,\ldots,a_{k+1})\\ &+\sum_{j=1}^k(-1)^j f(a_1,\ldots,a_ja_{j+1},\ldots,a_{k+1})\\ &+(-1)^{k+1}f(a_1,\ldots,a_k)a_{k+1}. \tag{1.1}\end{align*}

In degree zero, (db)(a)=ab-ba. As usual, d^2=0. We use the notation

H_b^k(M,M)= \ker\bigl(d:C_b^k(M,M)\to C_b^{k+1}(M,M)\bigr) \big/ \operatorname{im}\bigl(d:C_b^{k-1}(M,M)\to C_b^k(M,M)\bigr).

The denominator is the actual image, without a closure.

The Kadison–Ringrose cohomology conjecture asks whether H_b^k(M,M)=0 for every complex von Neumann algebra M and every positive integer k. Sinclair and Smith trace this self-coefficient formulation to 1967 [SS98b, p. 3376]. Our main result settles the higher degrees.

Theorem 1.1. Let M be a complex von Neumann algebra and let k\geq2. Every f\in C_b^k(M,M) satisfying df=0 has the form f=dg for some g\in C_b^{k-1}(M,M). Consequently H_b^k(M,M)=0.

Together with the inner-derivation theorem, Theorem 1.1 resolves the Kadison–Ringrose cohomology conjecture positively.

1.1 Prior work

Kadison and Ringrose proved vanishing for type I and hyperfinite von Neumann algebras [KR71a, Theorem 4.4] [KR71b, Theorem 3.1]. Their extended-cobounding theorem also gives a primitive for an M-valued cocycle on a general concrete von Neumann algebra M\subset B(H) when the primitive may take values in B(H) [KR71b, Theorem 2.4]; keeping the values in the original algebra is the essential self-coefficient problem here. Johnson, Kadison, and Ringrose then identified continuous cohomology with separately normal cohomology [JKR72, Theorem 5.6]. The completely bounded methods of Christensen, Effros, and Sinclair [CES87] established vanishing whenever the type \mathrm{II}_1 central summand absorbs the hyperfinite \mathrm{II}_1 factor, including all algebras without a type \mathrm{II}_1 summand; see the precise restatement in [CPSS03, p. 636, equation (1.1)].

The remaining finite-algebra problem has several substantial positive cases. Sinclair and Smith proved vanishing for algebras with separable predual and a Cartan subalgebra [SS98a]; Cameron removed the separability hypothesis for type \mathrm{II}_1 factors with a Cartan maximal abelian subalgebra [Cam09, Theorem 3.2]. Christensen, Pop, Sinclair, and Smith proved vanishing for all type \mathrm{II}_1 factors with property \Gamma, including nonseparable ones [CPSS03, Theorem 7.2]. Qian and Shen extended this direction to type \mathrm{II}_1 algebras with separable predual and their generalized property \Gamma [QS15, Theorem 6.4]. In degree two, Pop and Smith proved vanishing for the tensor product of any two type \mathrm{II}_1 von Neumann algebras, with no separability assumption [PS10, Theorem 4.5]. Theorem 1.1 removes the structural restrictions on the finite algebra in every degree k\geq2.

The Cartan argument of Sinclair and Smith also provides a useful methodological comparison. They show that complete boundedness in the last cocycle variable suffices. They use a projection of Christensen and Sinclair [CS95] from completely bounded linear maps onto right module maps, in the form recalled in [SS98b, Theorem 3.4], to obtain a primitive [SS98b, Section 4]. Thus the passage from averaging one variable to a module identity already has a central role in the earlier theory.

1.2 The new ingredients

We obtain the needed module identity by averaging over a single unitary random walk. Averaging one cocycle input first gives only a harmonic map; the main new input is a Liouville theorem that makes such a map commute with right multiplication. Suppose that M is a type \mathrm{II}_1 algebra with separable predual and faithful normal tracial state \tau, and write \norm{x}_2=\tau(x^*x)^{1/2}. Let \U(M) denote its unitary group. We construct a symmetric, countably supported probability measure \mu on \U(M), with a 2-dense set of atoms, such that

T(x)=\E_{U\sim\mu}\bigl[T(xU)U^*\bigr] \quad(x\in M) \qquad\Longrightarrow\qquad T(x)=T(1)x. \tag{1.2}

Here T:M\to M is any bounded linear map that is 2-norm continuous on each operator-norm ball. No positivity or complete-boundedness assumption is imposed. The measure is fixed before the harmonic map is chosen.

For a separately normal cocycle, Akemann’s continuity theorem [Ake67, Corollary III.10] supplies the stated continuity in the last input. A uniform continuity modulus survives the averaging limit, even though that limit need not remain normal, and also passes to the tracial ultrapowers used in the Liouville proof.

The proof of (1.2) combines probabilistic and algebraic arguments. The finite free configurations come from Popa’s construction of free-independent sequences [Pop95], in the formulation of his later ultraproduct independence theorem [Pop14]. These give finite unitary configurations with prescribed small word traces. A hierarchy of increasingly rare, increasingly large sets of such unitaries gives a single random walk whose long independent products approach free Haar joint moments along a subsequence. Only moment convergence is required.

Second, we use the classical harmonic-martingale construction [Fur63, p. 415] to obtain an L^2(M,\tau)-valued martingale. A nonconstant limit would produce free Haar unitaries g_1,g_2,\ldots in a tracial ultrapower and distinct a,b\in M. The coordinatewise lift of T to that ultrapower sends each nonempty signed word w with pairwise distinct unsigned indices to aw or bw, according to the sign of its first letter; here a,b are identified with their constant images. We prove that these identities are impossible for a bounded map with the stated continuity. The argument averages free generators, discards repeated surviving indices using Haagerup’s free-group length estimate [Haa79], and passes to a unitary polar part. Positive and negative powers of that unitary would then carry different left multipliers. Uniformly bounded sine sums and a spectral partition force the multipliers to agree. This rigidity statement, proved in Theorem 4.1, is independent of the cocycle problem.

Finally, in this tracial type \mathrm{II}_1 setting, for a separately normal cocycle f we take a pointwise ultraweak cluster point of the Cesàro averages in its last input. The Liouville theorem identifies the resulting fixed map as a right module map in that input. Averaging the original cocycle equation then gives a primitive g with \norm{g}\leq\norm{f}. Together with compactness, this uniform estimate removes the separability assumption. We then partition the type \mathrm{II}_1 summand into central pieces admitting faithful normal tracial states. Lemma 5.4 corrects mixed inputs from distinct pieces, and uniform bounds permit their assembly. The classical vanishing theorem handles the complementary summand.

1.3 Conventions and classical reductions

All von Neumann algebras and maps are complex, and subalgebras are unital unless otherwise stated. A finite algebra is called type \mathrm{II}_1 here when it has no nonzero type I central summand; its center need not be trivial. A map f:M^k\to M is separately normal if it is ultraweakly continuous in each input with the others fixed. For a finite algebra with faithful normal tracial state, the 2-norm on bounded sets determines the strong-star topology. The inherited traces on subalgebras and tracial ultrapowers will usually also be denoted by \tau.

We use the following established cohomology results.

Proposition 1.2 (Classical reductions). Let M be a von Neumann algebra and k\geq2.

  1. (i)

    If f\in C_b^k(M,M) is a cocycle, there are a separately normal bounded cocycle f_0 and a bounded (k-1)-cochain b such that f=f_0+db.

  2. (ii)

    If M has no type \mathrm{II}_1 central summand, then H_b^k(M,M)=0.

Part (i) is the Johnson–Kadison–Ringrose normal-reduction theorem [JKR72, Lemma 5.4 and Theorem 5.6]; its formulation for self-coefficients is recalled in [CPSS03, Section 2]. Part (ii) combines the classical type I and properly infinite vanishing results; see [KR71a, Theorem 4.4], [CES87], and [CPSS03, p. 636, equation (1.1)]. Both statements concern ordinary continuous cohomology and the actual image of d. These are the only cohomological inputs in the proof.

Section 2 constructs the walk. Section 3 proves its Liouville property using Theorem 4.1, proved in Section 4. Section 5 constructs bounded primitives and completes the reductions to arbitrary M.

2 A random walk with asymptotically free products

Throughout this section, (M,\tau) is a finite von Neumann algebra of type \mathrm{II}_1 with separable predual and faithful normal tracial state. In particular, M may have a nontrivial center. We construct a single symmetric probability measure on \U(M) whose independent long products approach the joint moments of free Haar unitaries along a subsequence. The construction combines finite approximation to freeness with increasingly rare increments chosen at successive stages.

Recall that unital subalgebras of a tracial von Neumann algebra are free if every alternating product of centered elements from successively different subalgebras has trace zero. Here centered means having trace zero. A unitary u is Haar if \tau(u^k)=0 for every k\in\Z\setminus\{0\}. A free Haar family (u_i) is equivalently characterized by

\tau\bigl(w(u_1,\ldots,u_r)\bigr)=0 \qquad(w\in\mathbb F_r\setminus\{e\}),

for every finite subfamily, where \mathbb F_r denotes the free group on r specified generators. The equivalence follows by expanding centered Laurent polynomials and then taking bounded 2-norm approximations. The length |w| is its reduced word length.

For a probability measure \mu on \U(M), let \mu^{*n} be the law of the ordered product U_1\cdots U_n of independent increments of law \mu. Symmetry means that U^{-1} has the same law as U.

Theorem 2.1. Let M be a finite type \mathrm{II}_1 von Neumann algebra with separable predual and faithful normal tracial state \tau. There exist a symmetric, countably supported probability measure \mu on \U(M) and a strictly increasing sequence n_\ell\to\infty with the following properties.

The positive-mass atoms of \mu contain a countable 2-norm dense subset of \U(M), and hence generate M as a von Neumann algebra. For every r\in\N, every nonempty finite set \mathcal W\subset\mathbb F_r\setminus\{e\}, and every \eta>0, if G_1^{(\ell)},\ldots,G_r^{(\ell)} are independent with law \mu^{*n_\ell}, then

\Pr\left( \max_{w\in\mathcal W} \left|\tau\bigl(w(G_1^{(\ell)},\ldots,G_r^{(\ell)})\bigr)\right| \geq\eta \right)\longrightarrow0.

Thus these products have joint free Haar moments in probability.

We first obtain finite unitary configurations for which prescribed words in path products have small traces. We then place such configurations at increasingly rare levels of a single measure, arranging that each finite moment test succeeds with probability tending to one.

2.1 Finite requirements from ultrapower freeness

The freeness input originates in Popa’s free-independent sequence construction [Pop95, Lemma 1.4 and Theorem 2.1]. We use the following special case of its later ultraproduct formulation [Pop14, Theorem 0.1(a)].

For a tracial von Neumann algebra (P,\tau_P) and a free ultrafilter \omega on \N, its tracial ultrapower is

P^\omega=\ell^\infty(\N,P)/\mathcal I_\omega, \qquad \mathcal I_\omega =\{(x_m):\lim_{m\to\omega}\norm{x_m}_2=0\}. \tag{2.1}

It is a finite von Neumann algebra with faithful normal trace \tau_P^\omega((x_m)^\omega)=\lim_{m\to\omega}\tau_P(x_m). We identify P with its constant sequences.

Lemma 2.2 (Popa’s ultrapower freeness). Let P be a \mathrm{II}_1 factor and let B\subset P^\omega be a unital von Neumann subalgebra with separable predual. There is a diffuse abelian von Neumann subalgebra of P^\omega free from B. Consequently, for every d\in\N, there are Haar unitaries u_1,\ldots,u_d\in P^\omega such that B,W^*(u_1),\ldots,W^*(u_d) are free.

Proof. Apply Theorem 0.1(a) of [Pop14] with every coordinate algebra and every coordinate subalgebra equal to P. The required non-intertwining condition holds: a nonzero corner of the diffuse factor P cannot embed in the scalar relative commutant, or in a finite matrix amplification of it. Moreover, P^\omega is a factor, so the relative commutant of the full ultraproduct subalgebra is \C1. The conclusion for the separable centered subspace B\ominus\C1 is therefore ordinary scalar-trace freeness. This is the case in which every coordinate subalgebra equals its ambient factor, discussed after that theorem and in [Pop14, Sections 1.5–1.6].

A diffuse abelian tracial algebra contains a Haar unitary. Choose one, adjoin it to B, and repeat. Finite adjunction preserves separable predual: a countable generating set gives a separable tracial Hilbert space by polynomial approximation. Thus all d choices take place in the same ultrapower. At each step the new algebra is free from the algebra generated at the preceding steps, giving the asserted family.

We next record why a single fresh label in each path is sufficient. A path expression is a finite ordered product of fixed unitary coefficients and formal letters U_j^{\pm1}. Occurrences and labels in such expressions are counted before any simplification.

Lemma 2.3 (Distinguished letters). Let B,W^*(u_1),\ldots,W^*(u_d) be free subalgebras of a tracial von Neumann algebra, with each u_j Haar. Let y_1,\ldots,y_r be path expressions evaluated at these unitaries, with coefficients in \U(B). Suppose that for each i there is a label h_i occurring exactly once in the entire list of path expressions, and that its occurrence belongs to y_i. Then

\tau\bigl(w(y_1,\ldots,y_r)\bigr)=0 \qquad(w\in\mathbb F_r\setminus\{e\}).

Proof. The labels h_1,\ldots,h_r are distinct. Put all nondistinguished unitaries into the coefficient algebra:

B_0=W^*\bigl(B,u_j:j\notin\{h_1,\ldots,h_r\}\bigr), \qquad C=W^*(u_{h_1},\ldots,u_{h_r}).

Then B_0 and C are free. This grouping property follows directly by expanding centered polynomials in a free family into alternating centered products; bounded approximation extends it to the generated von Neumann algebras. Write

y_i=A_i u_{h_i}^{\epsilon_i}B_i, \qquad A_i,B_i\in\U(B_0),\quad \epsilon_i\in\{-1,1\}.

If w=x_{i_1}^{\sigma_1}\cdots x_{i_t}^{\sigma_t} is nonempty and reduced, its evaluated product has the form

c_0 u_{h_{i_1}}^{\epsilon_{i_1}\sigma_1}c_1 \cdots u_{h_{i_t}}^{\epsilon_{i_t}\sigma_t}c_t, \qquad c_0,\ldots,c_t\in\U(B_0).

The displayed distinguished-letter string is itself reduced. Indeed, an adjacent inverse pair would require i_j=i_{j+1} and \sigma_j=-\sigma_{j+1}, contrary to the reduction of w.

Expand every c_j, including the two outside coefficients, as its scalar part plus its centered part. In each resulting term, removing scalar coefficients joins distinguished letters into nonempty contiguous subwords of that reduced string. Every such block is a centered element of C. The remaining factors alternate between centered elements of B_0 and centered elements of C, and there is at least one C factor. Freeness makes the trace zero. If there are no centered coefficient factors, the term is just a scalar multiple of a nonempty reduced Haar word and again has trace zero. This proves the assertion, with no condition on the first and last indices of w.

Lemma 2.4 (Simultaneous finite path requirements). Fix a finite set F\subset\U(M), an integer d\geq1, and \varepsilon>0. Consider a finite collection of tests. Each test consists of a finite list of path expressions y_1,\ldots,y_r in the alphabet F\cup\{U_j^{\pm1}:1\leq j\leq d\} and a nonidentity word w\in\mathbb F_r. Assume that each path in each test has a distinguished label occurring exactly once in that test’s entire list, as in Lemma 2.3. The distinguished labels may differ between tests. There are u_1,\ldots,u_d\in\U(M) for which all the tests satisfy

\left|\tau\bigl(w(y_1(u),\ldots,y_r(u))\bigr)\right| <\varepsilon.

Proof. First suppose that M=P is a factor. The constant coefficient algebra W^*(F)\subset P^\omega has separable predual. Apply Lemma 2.2 and then Lemma 2.3. The same free d-tuple makes every prescribed trace exactly zero in P^\omega, even though different tests can designate different labels.

Every unitary of P^\omega has unitary representatives. To see this, take a bounded self-adjoint logarithm there, lift it to a bounded sequence of self-adjoint elements of P, and exponentiate coordinatewise. Choose such representatives for the d unitaries. Each test trace converges to zero along \omega. Since the family of tests is finite, the coordinate sets on which their absolute values are less than \varepsilon have a common member. Its d coordinate unitaries solve all the requirements in P.

For general M, the factor case will give successful tuples in almost every fiber. The remaining task is to choose them measurably. Use the central direct integral [Bla06, Sections III.1.6 and III.5.1]

M=\int_\Omega^\oplus M_s\,d\nu(s), \qquad \tau(x)=\int_\Omega\tau_s(x(s))\,d\nu(s),

where (\Omega,\nu) is a probability space and, almost everywhere, M_s is a \mathrm{II}_1 factor with its normalized trace \tau_s. Standard separable direct-integral theory provides countably many bounded measurable sections a_j whose values generate M_s for almost every s. After removing one null set, all these properties and the unitary identities for the finitely many coefficients hold simultaneously.

There is a countable family (v_j) of measurable unitary sections which is dense in each fiber unitary group for \norm{\cdot}_{2,s}. Here is an explicit construction. Enumerate the sections

\exp(iq(a_1,a_2,\ldots)),

where q ranges over self-adjoint *-polynomials in finitely many variables with coefficients in \mathbb Q+i\mathbb Q. This includes symmetrizations of arbitrary rational *-polynomials. In a fixed fiber, any unitary is \exp(ih) for a bounded self-adjoint h. Kaplansky density and norm approximation by rational polynomials approximate h in 2-norm by the indicated self-adjoint polynomials. For bounded self-adjoint a,b, the integral identity

e^{ia}-e^{ib} =i\int_0^1 e^{i(1-t)a}(a-b)e^{itb}\,dt

implies \norm{e^{ia}-e^{ib}}_2\leq\norm{a-b}_2. Thus these sections have the required fiberwise density. Each section is globally bounded, and exponentiation makes its norm one.

Enumerate all ordered d-tuples drawn from (v_j) as \boldsymbol v^{(1)},\boldsymbol v^{(2)},\ldots. Let E_k be the set of fibers where candidate k satisfies every test with absolute trace less than \varepsilon/2. These sets are measurable, since the traces of products of measurable sections are measurable. They cover almost every fiber. Indeed, the factor case gives a successful tuple in each such fiber, and the requirements are open in the product 2-norm topology. For this last assertion, telescoping products of unitaries gives

\norm{z_1\cdots z_L-z'_1\cdots z'_L}_2 \leq\sum_{j=1}^L\norm{z_j-z'_j}_2, \qquad |\tau_s(x)|\leq\norm{x}_{2,s},

and inversion is also a 2-norm isometry on unitaries. The countable dense tuples therefore meet the open set of successful choices.

Take the first successful tuple: on the disjoint measurable sets

E_k\setminus\bigcup_{j<k}E_j

use \boldsymbol v^{(k)}, and use the identity tuple on the null complement. The resulting sections u_1,\ldots,u_d are measurable and unitary, so belong to M. Each test has fiber trace of absolute value less than \varepsilon/2 almost everywhere. Integrating gives an absolute global trace at most \varepsilon/2<\varepsilon, as required.

2.2 One measure satisfying all moment tests

Proof of Theorem 2.1. Choose a 2-norm dense sequence (v_j)_{j\geq1} in \U(M) and put

\mu_0=\sum_{j\geq1}2^{-j-1}(\delta_{v_j}+\delta_{v_j^{-1}}).

For \ell\geq1, fix the numerical parameters

\begin{align*} p_\ell&=2^{-2^\ell}, &p_0&=1-\sum_{\ell\geq1}p_\ell,\\ n_\ell&=p_\ell^{-3/2}=2^{3\cdot2^{\ell-1}}, &K_\ell&=\ell n_\ell,\\ d_\ell&=K_\ell^4.\end{align*}

Here n_\ell and d_\ell are positive integers, and p_0>0 because p_\ell\leq4^{-\ell}. At time n_\ell we will sample \ell paths, choosing level j with probability p_j at each increment. These parameters make level \ell appear in every path with high probability while later levels remain unlikely. The much larger label count d_\ell makes repeated level-\ell labels unlikely across the K_\ell increments. We construct finite symmetric measures

\mu_\ell=\frac1{2d_\ell} \sum_{j=1}^{d_\ell}(\delta_{u_{\ell,j}} +\delta_{u_{\ell,j}^{-1}})

successively, and finally set

\mu=p_0\mu_0+\sum_{\ell\geq1}p_\ell\mu_\ell.

At stage \ell, choose a finite symmetric set F_\ell of base atoms with \mu_0(F_\ell)>1-K_\ell^{-2}. The coefficient alphabet consists of F_\ell and all u_{j,h}^{\pm1} from stages j<\ell; it is finite. Introduce d_\ell unknown unitary labels. Consider every ordered list of \ell paths of length n_\ell in this alphabet and the signed unknown labels such that:

  1. 1.

    each path contains at least one unknown label;

  2. 2.

    no unknown label occurs twice anywhere in the entire list, irrespective of sign.

For each such list and every nonempty reduced word of length at most \ell on \ell generators, require its evaluated trace to have absolute value less than 1/\ell. There are finitely many lists and finitely many words: all alphabet sizes, path lengths, and word lengths have been fixed before making this choice. Designating any one unknown occurrence in each path puts every test under Lemma 2.4. Apply that lemma to choose u_{\ell,1},\ldots,u_{\ell,d_\ell} satisfying all these requirements simultaneously. This completes the induction.

We estimate probabilities on a labeled sampling space. An increment first chooses a level j with probability p_j. At level zero it chooses an atom with law \mu_0; at level j\geq1 it chooses one of d_j labels uniformly and an independent uniform sign. Its value is then the corresponding unitary. This description gives law \mu even when distinct labels happen to represent the same element of M.

Sample \ell independent paths of length n_\ell, involving K_\ell increments in all. Let \mathcal B_\ell be the union of the following four events: a level greater than \ell appears; a level-zero increment lies outside F_\ell; a level-\ell label is repeated; or some path has no level-\ell increment. Union bounds give

\begin{align*} \Pr(\mathcal B_\ell) &\leq K_\ell\sum_{j>\ell}p_j +K_\ell p_0\mu_0(\U(M)\setminus F_\ell)\\ &\quad+\frac{\binom{K_\ell}{2}}{d_\ell} +\ell(1-p_\ell)^{n_\ell}. \tag{2.2}\end{align*}

For the collision term, any specified pair of increments has probability p_\ell^2/d_\ell\leq1/d_\ell of using the same level-\ell label; the signs do not matter. For the last term, a specified path misses that level with probability (1-p_\ell)^{n_\ell}.

Every term on the right of (2.2) tends to zero. Indeed, p_{\ell+1}=p_\ell^2 and p_\ell\leq1/4, so

\sum_{j>\ell}p_j \leq\frac{p_\ell^2}{1-p_\ell^2} \leq\frac{16}{15}p_\ell^2.

Consequently, the four terms admit the respective bounds

\begin{align*} \frac{16}{15}\ell\sqrt{p_\ell},\qquad K_\ell^{-1},\qquad \frac{1}{2K_\ell^2},\qquad \ell\exp(-p_\ell^{-1/2}),\end{align*}

all converging to zero.

Outside \mathcal B_\ell, the sampled paths form exactly one of the lists tested at stage \ell. All their earlier-level factors belong to the coefficient alphabet, each path has a level-\ell label, and all occurrences of those labels are distinct. Thus, simultaneously for every w\in\mathbb F_\ell with 1\leq|w|\leq\ell, the trace of the evaluated word has absolute value less than 1/\ell.

Now fix r, a nonempty finite \mathcal W, and \eta>0. For \ell\geq\max\{r,\max_{w\in\mathcal W}|w|\}, append independent paths to the given r paths to obtain \ell paths. On the preceding good event every word in \mathcal W has absolute trace below 1/\ell. Once 1/\ell<\eta, the probability in the theorem is at most \Pr(\mathcal B_\ell) and therefore tends to zero.

The measure \mu is symmetric and countably supported by construction. Its base component has positive weight, so each v_j is a positive-mass atom. Since bounded 2-norm convergence implies strong convergence in the tracial representation, the von Neumann algebra generated by these atoms contains every unitary and hence is M. Finally, the identity group word always has trace one, and every *-monomial in unitaries reduces to a group word. The asserted convergence therefore describes all joint *-moments.

Remark 2.5. Theorem 2.1 asserts convergence of scalar moments. It does not assert convergence of operator norms of polynomials in the sampled products. Its finite-family formulation permits further conditions whose failure probabilities tend to zero to be imposed simultaneously at any fixed stage of a later selection argument.

3 A Liouville theorem for the walk

We show that a bounded harmonic map for the walk of Theorem 2.1, subject to continuity on bounded sets in the tracial 2-norm, is left multiplication by its value at 1. The probabilistic part of the proof produces free Haar unitaries such that, on words with pairwise distinct unsigned indices, a single map acts by one of two left multipliers according to the sign of the first letter. Theorem 4.1, proved in Section 4, forces those multipliers to coincide for bounded linear maps with the same continuity in any finite von Neumann algebra with a faithful normal tracial state.

3.1 Continuity and tracial ultrapowers

Definition 3.1. Let (N,\rho) be a finite von Neumann algebra with a faithful normal tracial state. A linear map R:N\to N is bounded-ball 2-continuous if

\sup_j\norm{x_j}<\infty,\qquad \norm{x_j}_2\longrightarrow0 \quad\Longrightarrow\quad \norm{R(x_j)}_2\longrightarrow0. \tag{3.1}

Here and below \norm{x}_2=\rho(x^*x)^{1/2} when the ambient algebra is (N,\rho).

The following lemma records the continuity needed after each of the two ultrapowers in the argument. It applies without a separability assumption.

Lemma 3.2. Let (N,\rho) be as in Definition 3.1, and let R:N\to N be bounded and linear. Condition (3.1) is equivalent to the following uniform assertion: for every r<\infty and \varepsilon>0 there is \delta>0 such that

\norm{x}\le r,\quad \norm{x}_2<\delta \quad\Longrightarrow\quad \norm{R(x)}_2<\varepsilon. \tag{3.2}

If this condition holds and \omega is a free ultrafilter on \N, then

R^\omega:N^\omega\longrightarrow N^\omega, \qquad R^\omega([(x_j)]_\omega)=[(R(x_j))]_\omega, \tag{3.3}

is a well-defined bounded linear map with \norm{R^\omega}\le\norm{R}. It is bounded-ball 2-continuous for the ultrapower trace. In particular, for every free ultrafilter \nu, the map (R^\omega)^\nu on (N^\omega)^\nu has the same properties.

Proof. If (3.2) fails for some r,\varepsilon, choose x_j with \norm{x_j}\le r, \norm{x_j}_2<1/j, and \norm{R(x_j)}_2\ge\varepsilon. This contradicts (3.1); the converse is immediate. Applying the uniform assertion to differences gives uniform 2-norm continuity on each fixed operator norm ball.

Use the tracial ultrapower and its ideal \mathcal I_\omega from (2.1), now for (N,\rho). Its tracial norm is

\norm{[(x_j)]_\omega}_2=\lim_{j\to\omega}\norm{x_j}_2.

By (3.2), the coordinate map induced by R preserves \mathcal I_\omega. Applying this observation to the difference of two bounded representatives proves that (3.3) is well-defined. The quotient norm gives

\norm{R^\omega(X)} \le \norm{R}\inf_{[(x_j)]_\omega=X}\sup_j\norm{x_j} =\norm{R}\norm{X}.

To transfer the modulus, fix r<\infty and \varepsilon>0, and choose \delta in (3.2) for the radius r+1 and the output tolerance \varepsilon/2. If \norm{X}\le r, the quotient norm allows a representative with \sup_j\norm{x_j}\le r+1. When \norm{X}_2<\delta/2, the set

\{j:\norm{x_j}_2<\delta\}

belongs to \omega. Consequently

\norm{R^\omega(X)}_2 =\lim_{j\to\omega}\norm{R(x_j)}_2 \le\varepsilon/2<\varepsilon.

Thus \delta/2 is a valid input tolerance for R^\omega on the radius-r ball. The proof used no separability of N and applies again with N^\omega in its place, proving the last assertion.

3.2 The harmonic map and its martingale

The probabilistic step uses the classical passage from harmonic functions to martingales along random products; see [Fur63, p. 415]. Here the function is D(g)=T(g)g^* with values in L^2(M,\tau), and the required convergence follows directly from orthogonality of Hilbert-space martingale increments.

Theorem 3.3. Let (M,\tau) be a type \mathrm{II}_1 von Neumann algebra with separable predual and a faithful normal tracial state, and let \mu be the measure supplied by Theorem 2.1. Suppose that T:M\to M is bounded, linear, and bounded-ball 2-continuous, and that

T(x)=\E_{U\sim\mu}\bigl[T(xU)U^*\bigr] \qquad(x\in M). \tag{3.4}

Then

T(x)=T(1)x\qquad(x\in M). \tag{3.5}

Proof. Write C=\norm{T} and H=L^2(M,\tau). Expectations in (3.4) are norm-convergent sums, since \mu is countably supported and \norm{T(xU)U^*}\le C\norm{x}. For g\in\U(M) put

D(g)=T(g)g^*.

Let U_1,U_2,\ldots be independent with law \mu, and set W_0=1, W_n=U_1\cdots U_n, and \mathcal F_n=\sigma(U_1,\ldots,U_n). The H-valued random variables Z_n=D(W_n) have countable range and satisfy \norm{Z_n}_2\le\norm{Z_n}\le C. Moreover,

\begin{align*} \E[Z_{n+1}\mid\mathcal F_n] &=\E\bigl[T(W_nU_{n+1})U_{n+1}^*W_n^* \mid\mathcal F_n\bigr] \\ &=T(W_n)W_n^*=Z_n.\end{align*}

Thus (Z_n) is a martingale in L^2(\Omega;H). Its increments are orthogonal, and

\norm{Z_0}_2^2+ \sum_{j=0}^{n-1}\E\norm{Z_{j+1}-Z_j}_2^2 =\E\norm{Z_n}_2^2\le C^2.

It follows that Z_n converges in L^2(\Omega;H) to a random variable Z_\infty, and continuity of conditional expectation gives Z_n=\E[Z_\infty\mid\mathcal F_n]. In particular, with

e_k=\E\norm{Z_\infty-Z_k}_2^2\longrightarrow0, \tag{3.6}

orthogonality gives the uniform Cauchy estimate

\E\norm{Z_n-Z_k}_2^2=e_k-e_n\le e_k \qquad(n\ge k). \tag{3.7}

The operator norm ball K_C=\{x\in M:\norm{x}\le C\} is closed in H. Indeed, from a 2-norm-convergent sequence in K_C, ultraweak compactness provides an ultraweakly convergent subnet with limit in K_C. Testing against \tau(y^*\,\cdot), for y\in M, identifies this limit with the H-limit, since M is dense in H. A subsequence of Z_n converges almost surely in H, so Z_\infty\in K_C almost surely.

If Z_\infty=c almost surely, conditional expectation gives Z_0=Z_1=c almost surely. Hence c=T(1) and D(u)=c at every atom u of \mu. These atoms contain a 2-norm-dense subset of \U(M) by Theorem 2.1. For any u\in\U(M), choose atoms u_j with \norm{u_j-u}_2\to0. Bounded-ball continuity gives T(u_j)\to T(u) in 2-norm, while \norm{cu_j-cu}_2\le\norm{c}\norm{u_j-u}_2\to0. Since T(u_j)=cu_j, we obtain T(u)=cu. Every element of a unital complex C^*-algebra is a finite linear combination of unitaries, proving (3.5) in this case.

Suppose, for a contradiction, that Z_\infty is not deterministic. Its law is a Borel probability measure on the separable Hilbert space H, so its support contains two distinct points a,b. Because K_C is closed and has full measure, a,b\in K_C\subset M.

Forward and reverse endpoints. We claim that, for every \delta>0, there are numbers \eta_\delta>0 and N_\delta such that, whenever n\ge N_\delta and G has law \mu^{*n},

\Pr\bigl(\norm{D(G)-a}_2<\delta, \ \norm{D(G^{-1})-b}_2<\delta\bigr) \ge\eta_\delta. \tag{3.8}

Realize G=U_1\cdots U_n, let h=\lfloor n/2\rfloor, and put

A_n=D(U_1\cdots U_h),\qquad B_n=D(U_n^{-1}\cdots U_{n-h+1}^{-1}).

The two variables use disjoint sets of increments and are independent. Symmetry of \mu implies that both have the law of Z_h. Apply (3.7) to the forward string and separately to the reversed inverse string, which is also a string of independent increments with law \mu. It gives

\E\norm{D(G)-A_n}_2^2\le e_h, \qquad \E\norm{D(G^{-1})-B_n}_2^2\le e_h. \tag{3.9}

For fixed \delta, the support property gives

p_a=\Pr(\norm{Z_\infty-a}_2<\delta/3)>0, \qquad p_b=\Pr(\norm{Z_\infty-b}_2<\delta/3)>0.

Mean-square convergence implies, for all sufficiently large h,

\Pr(\norm{Z_h-a}_2<2\delta/3)\ge p_a/2, \qquad \Pr(\norm{Z_h-b}_2<2\delta/3)\ge p_b/2.

Independence of A_n,B_n, the triangle inequality, and Markov’s inequality therefore bound the probability in (3.8) from below by

\frac{p_ap_b}{4}-\frac{18e_h}{\delta^2}.

For large n this is at least p_ap_b/8, proving the claim. The independence used here is that of the disjoint prefixes A_n,B_n; the variables G and G^{-1} remain dependent.

Concatenation of independent blocks. Let G_1,\ldots,G_m be independent with law \mu^{*n}, and consider

v(G)=G_{i_1}^{\sigma_1}\cdots G_{i_t}^{\sigma_t}, \qquad \sigma_j\in\{1,-1\},

where i_1,\ldots,i_t are pairwise distinct. Each inverse block can be represented by reversing and inverting its own increments. By symmetry, concatenating these distinct signed blocks is a length-tn walk with independent increments of law \mu. In particular,

\bigl(D(v(G)),D(G_{i_1}^{\sigma_1})\bigr) \quad\hbox{has the law of}\quad (Z_{tn},Z_n).

Consequently

\E\norm{D(v(G))-D(G_{i_1}^{\sigma_1})}_2^2\le e_n. \tag{3.10}

The restriction is on unsigned indices: using both G_i and G_i^{-1} would reuse a block and would not justify this estimate.

Finite requirements and diagonal selection. Fix an integer m\ge1 first, and use tolerance 1/m in (3.8). For m independent length-n products, let E_{m,n} be the event

\norm{D(G_i)-a}_2<1/m,\qquad \norm{D(G_i^{-1})-b}_2<1/m \quad(1\le i\le m).

Independence between the paths gives numbers c_m>0 and N_m such that

\Pr(E_{m,n})\ge c_m\qquad(n\ge N_m). \tag{3.11}

For example, one may take c_m=(\eta_{1/m})^m.

Let \mathcal Q_m be the finite set of nonidentity reduced words of length at most m on the symbols x_1,\ldots,x_m. Let \mathcal V_m be the finite set of all nonempty signed words on these symbols with pairwise distinct unsigned indices. Along the times n_\ell in Theorem 2.1, the probability that any of the requirements

\begin{align*} |\tau(q(G_1,\ldots,G_m))|&<1/m &&(q\in\mathcal Q_m),\tag{3.12}\\ \norm{D(v(G))-D(G_{i_1}^{\sigma_1})}_2&<1/m &&\bigl(v=x_{i_1}^{\sigma_1}\cdots x_{i_t}^{\sigma_t} \in\mathcal V_m\bigr) \tag{3.13}\end{align*}

fails tends to zero. For the first line, this is a finite union of the moment convergence statements in Theorem 2.1. For the second line, the union bound and (3.10) give the upper bound |\mathcal V_m|m^2e_{n_\ell}.

Choose \ell_m>\ell_{m-1}, after fixing m, so large that n_{\ell_m}\ge N_m and this combined failure probability is less than c_m/2. Then the intersection of E_{m,n_{\ell_m}} with all the requirements (3.12)–(3.13) has probability at least c_m/2>0. Choose a deterministic tuple

(u_1^{(m)},\ldots,u_m^{(m)})\in\U(M)^m

from that intersection. The constants c_m may tend to zero as fast as they please: the choice of \ell_m is made separately for each fixed m, after the positive lower bound has been obtained.

Write a_1=a and a_{-1}=b. The endpoint conditions and (3.13) imply, for every v=x_{i_1}^{\sigma_1}\cdots x_{i_t}^{\sigma_t}\in\mathcal V_m,

\norm{T(v(u^{(m)}))-a_{\sigma_1}v(u^{(m)})}_2 =\norm{D(v(u^{(m)}))-a_{\sigma_1}}_2<2/m. \tag{3.14}

The equality uses T(v)=D(v)v and the 2-norm isometry of right multiplication by the unitary v.

The exact family in the ultrapower. Fix a free ultrafilter \omega_1 on the tuple index m. Set u_i^{(m)}=1 when m<i, and define

N=M^{\omega_1},\qquad g_i=[(u_i^{(m)})_{m\ge1}]_{\omega_1}\quad(i\ge1), \qquad R=T^{\omega_1}.

Lemma 3.2 makes R a bounded linear map on N, with \norm{R}\le C, and supplies its bounded-ball 2-continuity. Each g_i is unitary. Every fixed nonidentity reduced word q lies in \mathcal Q_m for all sufficiently large m, so (3.12) gives

\tau^{\omega_1}(q(g_1,g_2,\ldots))=0. \tag{3.15}

These are precisely the joint moments of a countable free Haar family: powers of one generator are centered, and expansion of alternating centered Laurent polynomials in different generators reduces to nonidentity words. The corresponding freeness of their generated von Neumann algebras follows by bounded 2-norm approximation.

Identify a,b\in M with their constant images in N. For every nonempty word w=g_{i_1}^{\sigma_1}\cdots g_{i_t}^{\sigma_t} with pairwise distinct unsigned indices, (3.14) holds for all sufficiently large tuple indices. Hence it becomes the exact identity

R(w)= \begin{cases} aw,&\sigma_1=1,\\ bw,&\sigma_1=-1. \end{cases} \tag{3.16}

These are all the hypotheses of Theorem 4.1, applied to (N,\tau^{\omega_1}) and R. That theorem yields a=b in N. The constant embedding preserves the faithful trace, so this also means a=b in M, contrary to their choice. Thus Z_\infty is deterministic, and the earlier argument proves (3.5).

Only the scalar joint moments of the g_i and the identities (3.16) enter the rigidity theorem. Freeness of these unitaries from a or b is not asserted or needed.

4 Rigidity of the first-letter identities

The identities furnished by the walk concern words whose unsigned indices are pairwise distinct. We prove that their two left multipliers must agree. This rules out the distinct martingale endpoints constructed in Section 3.

Theorem 4.1. Let (N,\tau) be a finite von Neumann algebra with a faithful normal tracial state. Let R:N\to N be bounded and complex linear, and suppose that

\norm{R(x_n)}_2\longrightarrow0 \quad\text{whenever}\quad \sup_n\norm{x_n}<\infty, \qquad \norm{x_n}_2\longrightarrow0. \tag{4.1}

Let (g_j)_{j\geq1} be a free Haar family in N, and let a,b\in N. Suppose that for every nonempty signed word w=g_{i_1}^{\varepsilon_1}\cdots g_{i_q}^{\varepsilon_q} with \varepsilon_j\in\{1,-1\} and pairwise distinct indices i_1,\ldots,i_q,

R(w)= \begin{cases} aw,&\varepsilon_1=1,\\ bw,&\varepsilon_1=-1. \end{cases} \tag{4.2}

Then a=b.

Here the free Haar condition means that the trace of every nonidentity reduced group word in the g_j is zero. In particular, distinct reduced words are orthonormal for the tracial 2-norm. The coefficients a,b are arbitrary elements of the containing algebra.

The target is a unitary whose positive powers carry the multiplier a and whose negative powers carry the multiplier b. A spectral argument will show that these identities force a=b for a bounded map in a finite tracial algebra. Higher powers of any one g_j repeat its unsigned index, so the hypothesis does not give this target directly. Instead, we average many free generators, control the repeated indices in suitable polynomial expressions, and pass to the polar part of the resulting element in a further tracial ultrapower.

4.1 Norm control for free words

We use the following form of Haagerup’s length estimate [Haa79, Lemma 1.4]. We give the proof, including the transfer from the regular representation to the containing tracial algebra.

Lemma 4.2. Let \mathbb F_r be the free group on r generators and let \lambda be its left regular representation. For a finitely supported family (c_w)_{|w|=q} on the reduced words of length q\geq0,

\left\|\sum_{|w|=q}c_w\lambda(w)\right\| \leq(q+1)\left(\sum_{|w|=q}|c_w|^2\right)^{1/2}. \tag{4.3}

If g_1,\ldots,g_r have free Haar joint moments in a faithfully tracial von Neumann algebra, every scalar-coefficient word polynomial in them has the same norm as the corresponding polynomial in the regular generators. Consequently, (4.3) also holds with \lambda(w) replaced by w(g), and its right-hand side is (q+1)\norm{\sum_{|w|=q}c_w w(g)}_2.

Proof. Write L=\sum_{|w|=q}c_w\lambda(w). On the standard basis of \ell^2(\mathbb F_r), separate each product wx according to its exact number t\in\{0,\ldots,q\} of cancellations at the joining boundary. This gives L=\sum_{t=0}^q L_t on finitely supported vectors. Fix t. Such a product has the form

w=uv,\qquad x=v^{-1}h,\qquad wx=uh, \qquad |u|=q-t,\quad |v|=t,

where all three displayed concatenations uv, v^{-1}h, and uh are reduced. Conversely, these conditions describe exactly the products with t cancellations, allowing any of u,v,h to be empty when its required length permits this. In particular, h may be empty when the input is exhausted.

For this fixed t, an input basis word of length at least t has a unique prefix of length t and hence a unique suffix h. An output basis word of length at least q-t likewise determines h uniquely by removing its prefix of length q-t. Thus the input spaces indexed by different h are orthogonal, as are the corresponding output spaces. Relative to these two decompositions, L_t is a direct sum of matrices B_h, with columns indexed by v and rows by u. An entry is c_{uv} when the three reduction conditions hold and is zero otherwise. The fixed cutting length makes (u,v)\mapsto uv injective within each matrix. Therefore

\norm{B_h}\leq\norm{B_h}_{\mathrm{HS}} \leq\left(\sum_{|w|=q}|c_w|^2\right)^{1/2}.

Taking the direct-sum norm bounds L_t by the same quantity. Summing over the q+1 possible values of t proves (4.3).

For the norm transfer, recall that if A\geq0 belongs to a von Neumann algebra with faithful tracial state \rho, then

\norm{A}=\lim_{n\to\infty}\rho(A^n)^{1/n}. \tag{4.4}

The upper bound is immediate. If 0<c<\norm{A}, the spectral projection e=1_{(c,\infty)}(A) is nonzero and has positive trace, so \rho(A^n)\geq c^n\rho(e). Taking roots and then letting c\uparrow\norm{A} proves the formula. For a word polynomial p, the free Haar moments give, for every n\geq1,

\tau\bigl((p(g)^*p(g))^n\bigr) =\tau_{\mathbb F_r}\bigl((p(\lambda)^*p(\lambda))^n\bigr).

Both traces are faithful; here \tau_{\mathbb F_r} is the canonical trace on the free group von Neumann algebra. Applying (4.4) gives \norm{p(g)}=\norm{p(\lambda)}. The asserted 2-norm formula follows from orthonormality of reduced words.

Under the hypotheses of Theorem 4.1, set

s_r=r^{-1/2}\sum_{j=1}^r g_j\in N. \tag{4.5}

Lemma 4.2 gives \norm{s_r}_2=1 and \norm{s_r}\leq2 for every r. Fix a free ultrafilter \omega_2 on \N and put

\widehat N=N^{\omega_2},\qquad \widehat\tau=\tau^{\omega_2},\qquad s=(s_r)_{\omega_2}\in\widehat N,\qquad S=R^{\omega_2}. \tag{4.6}

Lemma 3.2 ensures that S is bounded and retains 2-norm continuity on operator norm balls. We identify a,b with their constant images in \widehat N.

In the application from Section 3, N=M^{\omega_1} and \widehat N=(M^{\omega_1})^{\omega_2}. The first index m selects increasingly accurate unitary tuples; the second index r increases the number of exact free generators being averaged in N, where the bound \norm{s_r}\leq2 is already available. The hypotheses and notation of Theorem 4.1 remain in force through the next two subsections.

Figure 1 locates the two ultrapowers in the Liouville argument and records the remaining passage from these bounded sums to a polar unitary and then to a=b.

The fixed walk has asymptotically free moments.
A hypothetical nonconstant harmonic-map martingale has
distinct support points a,b\in M.
\downarrow finite selection and the first ultrapower
In N=M^{\omega_1}: exact free Haar unitaries g_1,g_2,\ldots
and exact first-letter identities for R=T^{\omega_1}.
\downarrow free-group length estimate in N
s_r=r^{-1/2}\sum_{j=1}^r g_j satisfies \norm{s_r}\leq2.
In each fixed product of blocks s_r(s_r^*s_r)^d, d\geq0,
terms with repeated surviving indices have total norm tending to zero.
\downarrow the second ultrapower and polar approximation
In \widehat N=N^{\omega_2}: s=(s_r)_{\omega_2} has a unitary polar part V,
and S=R^{\omega_2} satisfies S(V^k)=aV^k, S(V^{-k})=bV^{-k}.
\downarrow bounded sine sums and the finite faithful trace
a=b, a contradiction. Hence T(x)=T(1)x.
Last-input averaging then produces the tracial cocycle primitive.

Figure 1: The Liouville contradiction and its use for cocycles. The first ultrapower uses scalar moment convergence; the norm bound is proved for the exact free family before the second ultrapower. The constants a,b are carried through the trace-preserving constant embeddings, and the power identities hold for every k\geq1.

4.2 From distinct indices to ordered blocks

Polynomial expressions in s_r may contain repeated indices, so their multiplier identities do not follow directly from the hypothesis. For polar approximation we will need powers of sp(s^*s), where p is a scalar polynomial. Expanding these powers without commuting any factors gives products of the blocks B_d(z)=z(z^*z)^d, d\geq0. We establish their identities by showing that repeated surviving indices contribute an error tending to zero in operator norm.

Lemma 4.3. For every k\geq1 and d_1,\ldots,d_k\geq0, let

P(z)=B_{d_1}(z)B_{d_2}(z)\cdots B_{d_k}(z).

Then

S(P(s))=aP(s),\qquad S(P(s)^*)=bP(s)^*. \tag{4.7}

Proof. Fix this product, and let L=\sum_{j=1}^k(2d_j+1) be its degree. Every term in the expansion of one block B_d(s_r) has the odd alternating sign pattern

+,-,+,-,\ldots,+.

Deleting adjacent inverse letters deletes two consecutive opposite signs. The remaining pattern is still alternating, begins and ends positively, and is nonempty: the excess of positive over negative signs remains one. Hence the free reduction of each block is a nonempty word with positive endpoint signs. After reducing the blocks internally, their boundaries join two positive letters and admit no further cancellation. Every reduced word in P(s_r) is therefore nonempty and begins and ends positively. Taking adjoints reverses the block order and all signs, so the corresponding assertion for P(s_r)^* has negative endpoint signs.

We next bound the coefficient of every possible reduced word, including words much shorter than L. Write

P(s_r)=\sum_{q=1}^L\sum_{|w|=q}c_w(r)w(g).

For a fixed reduced word w of length q, record a free reduction of an original term by pairing its original positions whenever their letters cancel. For definiteness, the reduction may be performed by reading from left to right and canceling against the last surviving letter whenever possible. The recorded pairs form a noncrossing partial matching of the L positions: there are (L-q)/2 pairs, and the unmatched positions spell w in order. All nested and newly adjacent cancellations are included in this record.

There are at most 3^L noncrossing partial matchings of L positions. Indeed, mark each position as an opening endpoint, a closing endpoint, or unmatched; noncrossing forces a closing endpoint to pair with the last unpaired opening endpoint, so this encoding is injective. We may count every such partial matching, including ones not realized by a reduction. For a fixed pattern and fixed w, the labels at the unmatched positions are prescribed. Each canceled pair has equal unsigned labels and opposite signs and hence has at most r label choices. Coincidences between different pairs or with unmatched positions can only reduce the number of choices. Each original term has coefficient r^{-L/2}. Consequently, for every q and w,

|c_w(r)|\leq C_L r^{(L-q)/2}r^{-L/2} =C_Lr^{-q/2},\qquad C_L=3^L. \tag{4.8}

An impossible parity or reduction pattern contributes zero. The same bound applies to the adjoint polynomial.

Let E_{r,q} be the sum of those length-q terms whose surviving reduced word has a repeated unsigned index. Original repetitions which disappear in the reduction remain included in the coefficients of the retained words. For q=1 this sum is zero. For q\geq2 the number of possible words in the sum is at most

2^q\binom q2 r^{q-1}:

choose a pair of equal-index positions, choose their common label and the other q-2 labels, and choose all signs. Counting nonreduced strings here only enlarges the bound. By orthonormality and (4.8),

\norm{E_{r,q}}_2^2 \leq C_L^2 2^q\binom q2 r^{-1}\qquad(2\leq q\leq L). \tag{4.9}

Lemma 4.2 now yields the aggregate operator norm estimate

E_r=\sum_{q=1}^L E_{r,q},\qquad \norm{E_r}\leq\sum_{q=2}^L(q+1)\norm{E_{r,q}}_2 =O_L(r^{-1/2})\longrightarrow0. \tag{4.10}

There is no scalar term, by the block reduction argument.

Put Q_r=P(s_r)-E_r. Each word in this finite sum has pairwise distinct unsigned indices and begins positively. Thus (4.2) and linearity give R(Q_r)=aQ_r. Moreover, \norm{P(s_r)}\leq2^L, so (4.10) also proves that the sequence (Q_r) is bounded. In N we have

\norm{R(P(s_r))-aP(s_r)} \leq(\norm{R}+\norm{a})\norm{E_r}\longrightarrow0.

Passing to \widehat N proves the first identity in (4.7). For the adjoint, the retained sum is Q_r^*: its reduced words have distinct unsigned indices and begin negatively. Therefore R(Q_r^*)=bQ_r^*, and the identical estimate with b proves the second identity.

4.3 A polar unitary and all its powers

The spectral calculation below is related to the polar decomposition of circular elements in free probability, established by Voiculescu and also proved by Banica [Voi90, Ban96]. We derive the required Catalan moments and spectral distribution directly. Only the absence of an atom at zero is needed to obtain the unitary polar part.

Lemma 4.4. The polar part V of s is a unitary in \widehat N, and

S(V^k)=aV^k,\qquad S(V^{-k})=bV^{-k} \qquad(k\geq1). \tag{4.11}

Proof. We first show that s has zero kernel, which makes its polar part unitary in the finite algebra. We then transfer the block identities to powers of that unitary. Set A=s^*s, so 0\leq A\leq4. To determine its kernel, we compute its moments. For d\geq1, the quantity \tau((s_r^*s_r)^d) is r^{-d} times the number of assignments of labels in \{1,\ldots,r\} to the alternating 2d positions

-,+,-,+,\ldots,-,+

whose word reduces to the identity. An identity reduction pairs all positions noncrossingly, so it uses at most d unsigned labels. Assignments using at most d-1 labels number O_d(r^{d-1}): for each number of labels, choose an ordered list of those labels and then assign a member of that list to each of the 2d positions.

If exactly d labels occur in an identity word, every label occurs twice. Its two occurrences must be paired in any cancellation matching, so the matching is uniquely determined by the labeling. Conversely, in a noncrossing perfect matching, every pair has an even number of positions inside it, since those positions must be matched among themselves. The endpoints therefore have opposite parities, and hence opposite signs in our alternating string. Assigning distinct labels to its d pairs gives an identity word: erase innermost pairs successively. It follows that the number of leading assignments is exactly

C_d(r)_d,\qquad (r)_d=r(r-1)\cdots(r-d+1),

where C_d is the number of noncrossing perfect matchings on 2d positions. Choosing the partner of the first position gives C_0=1 and C_d=\sum_{j=0}^{d-1}C_jC_{d-1-j}. The generating function thus satisfies C(z)=1+zC(z)^2; its solution with constant term one gives

C_d=\frac1{d+1}\binom{2d}{d}.

Consequently,

\widehat\tau(A^d) =\lim_{r\to\omega_2}\tau((s_r^*s_r)^d) =\lim_{r\to\infty}r^{-d} \bigl(C_d(r)_d+O_d(r^{d-1})\bigr) =C_d. \tag{4.12}

The zeroth moment is also C_0=1.

Consider the measure

d\nu(x)=\frac1{2\pi}\sqrt{\frac{4-x}{x}}\, 1_{(0,4)}(x)\,dx. \tag{4.13}

For every integer d\geq0, substitution x=4t and the beta integral give

\begin{split} \int_0^4 x^d\,d\nu(x) &=\frac{4^{d+1}}{2\pi} \int_0^1 t^{d-1/2}(1-t)^{1/2}\,dt\\ &=\frac{4^{d+1}}{2\pi} \frac{\Gamma(d+\tfrac12)\Gamma(\tfrac32)}{\Gamma(d+2)} =\frac{(2d)!}{d!(d+1)!}=C_d. \end{split}

In particular, \nu is a probability measure. Both \nu and the spectral distribution of A are supported in [0,4]. Equality of all their moments implies equality on polynomials and then on all continuous functions by uniform polynomial approximation. They are therefore the same measure. Since (4.13) has no atom at zero,

\widehat\tau(1_{\{0\}}(A))=0, \qquad 1_{\{0\}}(A)=0

by faithfulness. In the polar decomposition s=VA^{1/2} this gives V^*V=1. Traciality and faithfulness then give

\widehat\tau(1-VV^*)=1-\widehat\tau(V^*V)=0, \qquad VV^*=1.

Thus V is a unitary.

It remains to transfer the identities. For a fixed regularization parameter we will use polynomial approximation in operator norm; we will then remove the regularization using bounded-ball 2-continuity. For \varepsilon>0 put

x_\varepsilon=s(A+\varepsilon1)^{-1/2} =V\left(\frac{A}{A+\varepsilon1}\right)^{1/2}.

Fix k\geq1. A polynomial p(t)=\sum_{d=0}^D c_dt^d has the literal ordered expansion

[sp(A)]^k =\sum_{d_1,\ldots,d_k=0}^D c_{d_1}\cdots c_{d_k} [sA^{d_1}]\cdots[sA^{d_k}]. \tag{4.14}

Every summand is a product covered by Lemma 4.3. That lemma and complex linearity yield

S([sp(A)]^k)=a[sp(A)]^k, \qquad S(([sp(A)]^k)^*)=b([sp(A)]^k)^*.

For the second identity one takes the adjoint of the expansion (4.14), conjugating its scalar coefficients and reversing the block order, and applies the separate adjoint identity in Lemma 4.3. Choose polynomials converging uniformly on [0,4] to (t+\varepsilon)^{-1/2}. Functional calculus and boundedness of S pass the last two identities to the norm limit, giving

S(x_\varepsilon^k)=ax_\varepsilon^k, \qquad S((x_\varepsilon^k)^*)=b(x_\varepsilon^k)^*. \tag{4.15}

The x_\varepsilon are contractions, and their distance to V satisfies

\norm{x_\varepsilon-V}_2^2 =\int_0^4 \left(\sqrt{\frac{x}{x+\varepsilon}}-1\right)^2\,d\nu(x) \longrightarrow0

by dominated convergence and \nu(\{0\})=0. Multiplication satisfies \norm{xyz}_2\leq\norm{x}\norm{y}_2\norm{z} in a tracial algebra. The noncommutative telescoping identity

x_\varepsilon^k-V^k =\sum_{j=0}^{k-1}x_\varepsilon^j (x_\varepsilon-V)V^{k-1-j}

therefore shows that \norm{x_\varepsilon^k-V^k}_2\leq k\norm{x_\varepsilon-V}_2\to0; the same holds for their adjoints. All these powers are contractions. Using the bounded-ball 2-norm continuity of S in (4.15), along for example \varepsilon=1/n, proves (4.11).

4.4 The spectral conclusion

The final step uses boundedness, the identities for powers, and the finite faithful trace. No continuity assumption on the map is needed in Lemma 4.5.

Lemma 4.5. Let (\mathcal A,\rho) be a finite von Neumann algebra with faithful normal tracial state, let V\in\mathcal A be unitary, and let S:\mathcal A\to\mathcal A be bounded and complex linear. If a,b\in\mathcal A satisfy

S(V^k)=aV^k,\qquad S(V^{-k})=bV^{-k}\qquad(k\geq1),

then a=b.

Proof. We use analytic polynomials whose imaginary parts remain uniformly bounded on the unit circle while their real parts grow near 1. Rotating these polynomials will bound a-b on each short spectral arc; the trace will then combine the compression estimates without a loss depending on the number of arcs. Write \mathbb T=\{z\in\C:|z|=1\} and

H_m(z)=\sum_{k=1}^m\frac{z^k}{k},\qquad h_m=\sum_{k=1}^m\frac1k.

We first verify the uniform sine-sum bound

\sup_{m\geq1}\sup_{\theta\in\R} \left|\sum_{k=1}^m\frac{\sin(k\theta)}k\right| \leq B,\qquad B=1+\pi. \tag{4.16}

By periodicity and oddness it suffices to use the angular distance t\in[0,\pi] from 2\pi\Z. At t=0 the sum is zero. For t>0 put K=\lfloor1/t\rfloor. The part with k\leq\min(K,m) has absolute sum at most Kt\leq1, since |\sin(kt)|\leq kt. Geometric summation gives, for every interval of integers p\leq q,

\left|\sum_{k=p}^q\sin(kt)\right| \leq\left|\sum_{k=p}^q e^{ikt}\right| \leq\frac1{\sin(t/2)}\leq\frac\pi t.

If m\geq K+1, put p=K+1 and A_j=\sum_{k=p}^j\sin(kt). Abel summation gives

\sum_{k=p}^m\frac{\sin(kt)}k =\frac{A_m}{m} +\sum_{j=p}^{m-1}A_j\left(\frac1j-\frac1{j+1}\right).

Its absolute value is at most \pi/(tp)\leq\pi, including when K=0. This proves (4.16).

For \lambda\in\mathbb T, write

H_m(\lambda V)=X_{m,\lambda}+iY_{m,\lambda}, \qquad X_{m,\lambda}=X_{m,\lambda}^*,\quad Y_{m,\lambda}=Y_{m,\lambda}^*.

Continuous functional calculus and (4.16) give \norm{Y_{m,\lambda}}\leq B. The identities for positive and negative powers imply

\begin{split} S\bigl(H_m(\lambda V)-H_m(\lambda V)^*\bigr) &=aH_m(\lambda V)-bH_m(\lambda V)^*\\ &=(a-b)X_{m,\lambda}+i(a+b)Y_{m,\lambda}. \end{split}

Since the argument of S has norm at most 2B, we obtain

\norm{(a-b)X_{m,\lambda}}\leq C, \qquad C=B(2\norm{S}+\norm{a}+\norm{b}), \tag{4.17}

uniformly in m and \lambda.

Fix m and any half-open arc I\subset\mathbb T of angular length at most 1/m, and let e=1_I(V). Choose \lambda to rotate the midpoint of I to 1. On the rotated arc the argument \theta satisfies |\theta|\leq1/m, so

\operatorname{Re}H_m(e^{i\theta}) =\sum_{k=1}^m\frac{\cos(k\theta)}k \geq\cos(1)h_m.

Thus, for X=X_{m,\lambda}, Borel functional calculus gives an element F\in W^*(V) equal to 1/X on I and to zero off I, with

XF=e,\qquad \norm{F}\leq\frac1{\cos(1)h_m}.

Writing c=a-b and multiplying (4.17) on the right by F gives

\norm{ce}=\norm{cXF} \leq\frac{C}{\cos(1)h_m}=:\delta_m. \tag{4.18}

In the corner e\mathcal A e, this says ec^*ce\leq\delta_m^2 e.

Partition \mathbb T into finitely many disjoint half-open arcs of angular length at most 1/m, and denote their spectral projections by e_1,\ldots,e_{J_m}. They are orthogonal and sum to 1. Traciality and (4.18) imply

\begin{split} \norm{c}_2^2 &=\sum_{j=1}^{J_m}\rho(c^*ce_j) =\sum_{j=1}^{J_m}\rho(e_jc^*ce_j)\\ &\leq\delta_m^2\sum_{j=1}^{J_m}\rho(e_j) =\delta_m^2\longrightarrow0, \end{split}

because h_m\geq\log(m+1)\to\infty. Each arc estimate is weighted by the trace of its own projection; the number of arcs introduces no factor. Faithfulness gives c=0, as required. The right multiplication by F and the tracial compression identity apply to arbitrary a,b; the argument imposes no commutation condition and uses no particular spectral distribution of V.

Proof of Theorem 4.1. Construct s\in\widehat N and S=R^{\omega_2} as in (4.6). Lemma 4.3 propagates the first-letter identities to every ordered block product. Lemma 4.4 then provides a unitary V satisfying the positive and negative power identities. Lemma 4.5 gives equality of the constant images of a and b in \widehat N. The constant embedding is trace preserving and faithful, so a=b in N.

Remark 4.6. The finite hypothesis in Lemma 4.5 is essential. On H=\ell^2(\Z) let Ve_n=e_{n+1}, let p project onto \C e_0, and let q project onto the closed span of the e_n with n<0. The contraction S(X)=pXq on B(H) satisfies S(V^k)=pV^k and S(V^{-k})=0 for every k\ge1: the only nonzero input coordinate of pV^k is e_{-k}, whereas that of pV^{-k} is e_k. Thus the power identities hold with a=p\ne0=b.

5 Bounded primitives for Hochschild cocycles

We first apply Theorem 3.3 to separately normal cocycles on a type \mathrm{II}_1 algebra with separable predual and a faithful normal tracial state. The resulting uniform bound for a primitive will allow us first to remove separability and then to combine central summands. Throughout this section, normality of a linear map means ultraweak continuity, and separate normality has the corresponding meaning for multilinear maps.

5.1 Normality and continuity on bounded balls

The continuity needed by Theorem 3.3 is the tracial form of Akemann’s continuity theorem [Ake67, Corollary III.10]. We include a direct proof that allows a center and does not require a separable predual. The stronger joint multilinear continuity result for type \mathrm{II}_1 factors is [CPSS03, Theorem 4.4].

Lemma 5.1. Let M be a finite von Neumann algebra with faithful normal tracial state \tau, and let B:M\to M be bounded and normal. For every R<\infty and \varepsilon>0 there is \delta>0 such that

\norm{x}\le R,\quad \norm{x}_2<\delta \quad\Longrightarrow\quad \norm{B(x)}_2<\varepsilon.

Consequently B is 2-norm continuous on every operator norm ball.

Proof. We argue by contradiction. A failure of continuity will give elements with mutually orthogonal two-sided supports whose images stay uniformly away from zero in 2-norm. Random signs will then contradict the boundedness of B.

If the first assertion fails, there are R>0, \eta>0, and a sequence (x_j) such that

\norm{x_j}\le R,\qquad \norm{x_j}_2\longrightarrow0, \qquad \norm{B(x_j)}_2\ge\eta.

Choose \alpha>0 with \norm{B}\alpha<\eta/4. In the polar decomposition x_j=v_j|x_j|, set

r_j=1_{(\alpha,\infty)}(|x_j|),\qquad y_j=v_j|x_j|r_j,\qquad \ell_j=v_jr_jv_j^*,\qquad e_j=r_j\vee\ell_j.

Here r_j and \ell_j are the right and left support projections of y_j. In particular,

y_j=e_jy_je_j,\quad \norm{y_j}\le R,\quad \norm{x_j-y_j}\le\alpha,\quad \norm{B(y_j)}_2\ge 3\eta/4.

The trace and the spectral truncation give

\tau(e_j)\le\tau(r_j)+\tau(\ell_j) =2\tau(r_j)\le2\alpha^{-2}\norm{x_j}_2^2.

Pass to a subsequence for which \sum_j\tau(e_j)<\infty, and put p_j=\bigvee_{h\ge j}e_h. Then p_j decreases to zero: indeed, \tau(p_j)\le\sum_{h\ge j}\tau(e_h)\to0, and \tau is faithful and normal.

For fixed j and h>j, the compressions

(p_j-p_h)y_j(p_j-p_h)

converge ultraweakly to y_j as h\to\infty. Applying B preserves this convergence. The 2-norm is ultraweakly lower semicontinuous, as is seen from

\norm{y}_2= \sup\{ |\tau(b^*y)|:b\in M,\ \norm{b}_2\le1\}.

Starting with j_1=1, we may therefore choose successively j_{s+1}>j_s so that

t_s=(p_{j_s}-p_{j_{s+1}})y_{j_s}(p_{j_s}-p_{j_{s+1}}), \qquad \norm{B(t_s)}_2\ge\eta/2.

The t_s have pairwise orthogonal two-sided supports and \norm{t_s}\le R. Hence \norm{\sum_{s=1}^N\epsilon_st_s}\le R for every choice of signs \epsilon_s\in\{-1,1\}. Taking independent uniform signs, Hilbert space orthogonality of these scalar random variables yields

\frac{N\eta^2}{4} \le\sum_{s=1}^N\norm{B(t_s)}_2^2 =\E\norm{B\Bigl(\sum_{s=1}^N\epsilon_st_s\Bigr)}_2^2 \le\norm{B}^2R^2,

which is impossible for large N. This proves the asserted modulus. Applying it to differences, which lie in the ball of radius 2R, gives continuity on the ball of radius R.

5.2 Averaging the last input

Proposition 5.2. Let M be of type \mathrm{II}_1 with separable predual and faithful normal tracial state \tau. If k\ge2 and f\in C_b^k(M,M) is a separately normal cocycle, then there is g\in C_b^{k-1}(M,M) such that

dg=f,\qquad \norm{g}\le\norm{f}. \tag{5.1}

Proof. We first construct an averaged cochain that is a right module map in its last input. Evaluation at 1 will give a (k-1)-cochain, and averaging the original equation df=0 will identify its differential.

Choose the symmetric countably supported measure \mu for which Theorem 3.3 applies, and write \mu=\sum_{s\ge1}p_s\delta_{u_s}. For a bounded k-cochain \Phi, define

(P\Phi)(\mathbf a,x) =\sum_{s\ge1}p_s\Phi(\mathbf a,xu_s)u_s^*, \qquad \mathbf a=(a_1,\ldots,a_{k-1}). \tag{5.2}

The sum converges in operator norm, and P is a contraction for the cochain norm. If W_j=U_1\cdots U_j, where the U_i are independent with law \mu, and W_0=1, induction gives

(P^j f)(\mathbf a,x) =\E\bigl[f(\mathbf a,xW_j)W_j^*\bigr].

Set

F_n=\frac1n\sum_{j=0}^{n-1}P^j f.

We use compactness for pointwise ultraweak convergence. For each fixed tuple \mathbf x=(x_1,\ldots,x_k), all values F_n(\mathbf x) lie in the ultraweakly compact ball of radius \norm{f}\prod_i\norm{x_i}. The product of these balls, indexed by all tuples in M^k, is compact. Multilinearity is closed for this topology, since addition and scalar multiplication are ultraweakly continuous. Thus some subnet of (F_n) converges at every tuple to a bounded multilinear map F with \norm{F}\le\norm{f}.

On any common cochain norm ball, P is continuous for this topology. To see this, suppose \Phi_\lambda\to\Phi pointwise ultraweakly and \norm{\Phi_\lambda},\norm{\Phi}\le C. For a fixed tuple (\mathbf a,x) and a normal functional \rho\in M_*, truncate (5.2) after L terms. The finite sum passes to the limit, and the remaining difference has absolute value at most

2C\norm{\rho}\norm{x} \prod_{i=1}^{k-1}\norm{a_i}\sum_{s>L}p_s.

Letting L\to\infty proves the claim. Since

PF_n-F_n=\frac{P^nf-f}{n},\qquad \norm{PF_n-F_n}\le\frac{2\norm{f}}n,

the subnet limit satisfies PF=F.

Fix \mathbf a, and put B(x)=f(\mathbf a,x). This is a bounded normal linear map. For any R<\infty and \varepsilon>0, Lemma 5.1 provides \delta>0 such that

\norm{x}\le R,\quad \norm{x}_2<\delta \quad\Longrightarrow\quad \norm{B(xv)v^*}_2<\varepsilon \quad\hbox{for every }v\in\U(M).

Indeed, right multiplication by a unitary preserves both the operator norm and the 2-norm. The same bound holds after averaging over any W_j and after taking the Cesàro average. Ultraweak lower semicontinuity of the 2-norm then gives \norm{F(\mathbf a,x)}_2\le\varepsilon under these input bounds. Using \varepsilon/2 in place of \varepsilon proves the required continuity modulus for T(x)=F(\mathbf a,x). The equality PF=F is exactly the harmonicity identity for this map. Consequently Theorem 3.3 gives

F(\mathbf a,x)=h(\mathbf a)x, \qquad h(\mathbf a)=F(\mathbf a,1). \tag{5.3}

In particular h is a bounded (k-1)-cochain and \norm{h}\le\norm{f}.

It remains to obtain its coboundary identity. Let \nu_n=n^{-1}\sum_{j=0}^{n-1}\mu^{*j} and h_n(\mathbf a)=F_n(\mathbf a,1). Evaluate the original equation df=0 at (a_1,\ldots,a_k,v), multiply the output on the right by v^*, and average with respect to v\sim\nu_n. This gives the exact equality

\begin{align*} 0={}&a_1h_n(a_2,\ldots,a_k) +\sum_{j=1}^{k-1}(-1)^j h_n(a_1,\ldots,a_ja_{j+1},\ldots,a_k)\\ &+(-1)^k F_n(a_1,\ldots,a_{k-1},a_k) +(-1)^{k+1}f(a_1,\ldots,a_k). \tag{5.4}\end{align*}

The final term is unchanged because vv^*=1. Along the chosen subnet, each displayed evaluation converges ultraweakly; multiplication by a fixed a_i preserves that convergence. Passing to the limit and using (5.3) therefore yields

0=(dh)(a_1,\ldots,a_k)+(-1)^{k+1}f(a_1,\ldots,a_k).

Thus g=(-1)^kh satisfies (5.1). This calculation averages df at the displayed tuples; it requires neither a commutation relation between P and d nor separate normality of the limiting cochain F.

5.3 Removing the separability assumption

Uniform primitive bounds and pointwise ultraweak compactness were used to remove separability in [CPSS03, Section 7]. As in that argument, conditional expectations allow the approximating subalgebras to be chosen independently for each finite set of inputs.

Proposition 5.3. Let M be any type \mathrm{II}_1 von Neumann algebra admitting a faithful normal tracial state. Every separately normal cocycle f\in C_b^k(M,M), k\ge2, has a bounded primitive g with \norm{g}\le\norm{f}.

Proof. Order the finite subsets E\subset M by inclusion. For each E, choose a countably generated unital von Neumann subalgebra N_E containing E, the finite set f(E^k), and unital matrix systems of every size m\ge2. Such systems exist in a type \mathrm{II}_1 algebra: the unit can be divided into m equivalent orthogonal projections [Bla06, Examples III.2.5.4(iii)], and partial isometries between them supply the matrix units. Adjoining one system for each m adds only countably many generators.

The restriction of the trace to N_E is faithful and normal. The tracial Hilbert space L^2(N_E) is separable: *-polynomials with coefficients in \mathbb Q+i\mathbb Q in a countable set of generators are dense in the generated C^*-algebra in norm, and bounded strong approximation makes that algebra 2-norm dense in N_E. The faithful tracial representation thus gives N_E separable predual. Moreover N_E has no type I central part. A nonzero homogeneous type \mathrm{I}_n central summand would inherit a unital copy of M_m(\C) for every m, whereas its n-dimensional fibers cannot admit a unital copy when m>n. Every finite type I algebra decomposes into its homogeneous type \mathrm{I}_n summands. Since N_E is finite, it is therefore of type \mathrm{II}_1.

Let \mathcal E_E:M\to N_E be the normal trace-preserving conditional expectation. Its existence and bimodularity are classical; see [Dix53, Théorème 8] and [Ume54, Theorem 1]. Define

f_E=\mathcal E_E\circ f\big|_{N_E^k}.

This map is separately normal and has norm at most \norm{f}. For inputs in N_E, bimodularity of \mathcal E_E gives df_E=\mathcal E_E(df)=0. By Proposition 5.2, choose g_E\in C_b^{k-1}(N_E,N_E) such that dg_E=f_E and \norm{g_E}\le\norm{f}. Extend it to a cochain on M by

G_E(x_1,\ldots,x_{k-1}) =g_E(\mathcal E_Ex_1,\ldots,\mathcal E_Ex_{k-1}).

This extension has the same norm bound. If (a_1,\ldots,a_k)\in E^k, all its inputs and adjacent products belong to N_E. Expanding the differential consequently gives

(dG_E)(a_1,\ldots,a_k) =(dg_E)(a_1,\ldots,a_k) =\mathcal E_Ef(a_1,\ldots,a_k) =f(a_1,\ldots,a_k), \tag{5.5}

where the final equality uses f(E^k)\subset N_E.

The common norm bound and the same product compactness used above give a pointwise ultraweakly convergent subnet of (G_E), with limit g\in C_b^{k-1}(M,M) and \norm{g}\le\norm{f}. For a fixed k-tuple (a_1,\ldots,a_k), the indices of this subnet eventually contain E_0=\{a_1,\ldots,a_k\}. Equation (5.5) therefore holds eventually along the subnet. Passing to the limit in its finitely many coboundary terms gives dg=f at this tuple. This holds at every tuple, proving the proposition. The choices of N_E and \mathcal E_E can be made independently for different E; eventual exactness is supplied by the directed finite subsets.

5.4 Central cuts and mixed inputs

Uniform bounds and central decomposition also enter the tensor-product argument of [PS10, Section 4]. In the present setting we use an explicit homotopy to correct all inputs outside a given central summand before assembling the primitives.

For a central projection z\in M, regard zM as an M-bimodule under multiplication and put q=1-z. In degree zero we use C_b^0(M,zM)=zM and (d\xi)(a)=a\xi-\xi a. On cochains with values in zM, define the central cut by

(\operatorname{cut}_z\psi)(a_1,\ldots,a_n) =\psi(za_1,\ldots,za_n).

In degree zero this means \operatorname{cut}_z=\id on zM. Centrality and the fact that q annihilates this module show that \operatorname{cut}_z commutes with d. For a cocycle \psi with values in zM, a primitive for its restriction to zM, pulled back to M, accounts only for \operatorname{cut}_z\psi. The following homotopy supplies the remaining difference \psi-\operatorname{cut}_z\psi on arbitrary inputs, with a bound independent of z.

Lemma 5.4. For n\ge2 and \psi\in C_b^n(M,zM), set

\begin{split} (J_z\psi)(a_1,\ldots,a_{n-1}) =\sum_{i=1}^{n-1}(-1)^i\psi(&za_1,\ldots,za_{i-1}, q,qa_i,\\[-2pt] &a_{i+1},\ldots,a_{n-1}). \end{split} \tag{5.6}

Set J_z=0 in degrees zero and one. Then, in every degree,

dJ_z+J_zd=\id-\operatorname{cut}_z. \tag{5.7}

For n\ge1 the degree-n operator satisfies

\norm{J_z\psi}\le(n-1)\norm{\psi}. \tag{5.8}

Proof. The norm estimate follows directly from (5.6). To verify the identity, expand each input as a_i=za_i+qa_i. By multilinearity it suffices to use tuples whose entries each belong to zM or to qM. On such a tuple with first qM entry at position r, formula (5.6) consists of the single term inserting q immediately before that entry, with sign (-1)^r; on an all-zM tuple it is zero.

Consider such an n-tuple with first qM entry a_r. In (J_zd)\psi, merging the inserted q with a_r has total sign (-1)^r(-1)^r=1 and contributes \psi(a_1,\ldots,a_n). A merger strictly before the insertion has the same arguments as its counterpart in (dJ_z)\psi, but the latter inserts at position r-1, so their signs are opposite. A merger strictly after the pair (q,a_r) also has the same arguments as its counterpart in (dJ_z)\psi, and its merger index is larger by one, again reversing the sign. The merger of a_{r-1} with the inserted q, when r>1, vanishes because zMqM=0; the corresponding merger across a_{r-1},a_r in (dJ_z)\psi vanishes for the same reason.

The left outer terms cancel when r>1, with insertion indices r and r-1. When r=1, both left outer terms vanish because qM annihilates the output module. For the right outer terms, if r<n the same insertion index and the two consecutive differential degrees give opposite signs. If r=n, the last input is in qM, so both right outer terms vanish. Thus the only surviving term is \psi(a_1,\ldots,a_n), as required because the cut of this tuple is zero. On an all-zM tuple, both sides of (5.7) vanish.

For completeness, in degree one the formula reads

(J_zd\psi)(a)=-(d\psi)(q,qa)=\psi(qa) =\psi(a)-\psi(za),

since both outer module actions in (d\psi)(q,qa) vanish. In degree zero both sides are zero by the definitions. This proves the identity in all degrees.

In particular, if \psi\in C_b^k(M,zM) is a cocycle, then

d(J_z\psi)=\psi-\operatorname{cut}_z\psi, \qquad \norm{J_z\psi}\le(k-1)\norm{\psi}. \tag{5.9}

This bound is independent of the algebra and the central projection.

5.5 Completion of the proof

Proof of Theorem 1.1. The zero algebra is immediate, so assume M\ne0. Fix k\ge2 and an arbitrary bounded cocycle f_{\mathrm{orig}}\in C_b^k(M,M). By the normal reduction in Proposition 1.2, there are a separately normal cocycle f and a bounded (k-1)-cochain b such that

f_{\mathrm{orig}}=f+db.

Let z_{\mathrm{II}_1} be the central projection of the type \mathrm{II}_1 summand, and let z_0=1-z_{\mathrm{II}_1}. We first partition z_{\mathrm{II}_1} into central projections whose algebras admit faithful normal tracial states.

In the abelian algebra Z(z_{\mathrm{II}_1}M), choose a maximal orthogonal family (z_i)_{i\in I} of nonzero supports of normal states. Its join is z_{\mathrm{II}_1}: a nonzero complementary projection would support a further normal state, contradicting maximality. A state is faithful on its support, so each z_iZ(M) has a faithful normal state \varphi_i. Composing \varphi_i with the faithful normal center-valued trace of z_iM gives a faithful normal tracial state \tau_i on z_iM; see [Bla06, Theorem III.2.5.7 and Corollary III.2.5.8]. The family I may be uncountable. Omit z_0 if it is zero, and otherwise keep the entire complementary summand as one piece.

For each piece define the restricted cocycle

f_i(x_1,\ldots,x_k)=z_i f(x_1,\ldots,x_k), \qquad x_j\in z_iM.

Multiplication by a central projection is a bimodule map, so f_i is a separately normal cocycle and \norm{f_i}\le\norm{f}. For i\in I, Proposition 5.3 supplies a primitive b_i\in C_b^{k-1}(z_iM,z_iM) with

db_i=f_i,\qquad \norm{b_i}\le\norm{f}.

If z_0\ne0, the vanishing result for algebras without a type \mathrm{II}_1 central summand in Proposition 1.2 supplies a bounded primitive b_0 of f_0. Its norm is some finite number.

Pull each primitive back to M through the homomorphism x\mapsto z_ix:

\widetilde b_i(x_1,\ldots,x_{k-1}) =b_i(z_ix_1,\ldots,z_ix_{k-1}).

The outer module actions also pull back, since the outputs lie in z_iM. Thus

d\widetilde b_i(x_1,\ldots,x_k) =z_i f(z_ix_1,\ldots,z_ix_k) =\operatorname{cut}_{z_i}(z_if)(x_1,\ldots,x_k).

Define cochains with values in z_iM on all of M by

H_i=\widetilde b_i+J_{z_i}(z_if).

Equation (5.9) gives

dH_i=z_if, \qquad \norm{H_i}\le k\norm{f}\quad(i\in I),

and, when present,

\norm{H_0}\le\norm{b_0}+(k-1)\norm{f}.

There is consequently a single finite constant C bounding the norms of all these cochains; one can take the maximum of the two displayed bounds, omitting the second when z_0=0.

For an arbitrary central partition of unity, the map

M\longrightarrow\prod_i^{\ell^\infty}z_iM, \qquad x\longmapsto(z_ix)_i,

is an isometric *-isomorphism onto the bounded direct product. For surjectivity, the finite partial sums of a bounded family (x_i)_i, x_i\in z_iM, form a net directed by inclusion of the finite index sets. This net converges strongly, since the central supports are orthogonal; its limit belongs to M. For each tuple (x_1,\ldots,x_{k-1}), the family (H_i(x_1,\ldots,x_{k-1}))_i belongs to this product and has norm at most C\prod_j\norm{x_j}. Let G(x_1,\ldots,x_{k-1})\in M be the corresponding element. Coordinatewise multilinearity shows that G is a bounded multilinear cochain with \norm{G}\le C. Central projection commutes with every term of its coboundary, so

z_i(dG)=dH_i=z_if \qquad\hbox{for every central piece }i.

Since the projections have join 1, it follows that dG=f. Finally,

d(G+b)=f+db=f_{\mathrm{orig}}.

We have obtained an actual bounded (k-1)-cochain whose coboundary is the given cocycle. Hence H_b^k(M,M)=0 for every complex von Neumann algebra M and every k\ge2, with the actual image of d in the definition of cohomology and with no complete-boundedness hypothesis.

References

  1. [Ake67]C. A. Akemann, The dual space of an operator algebra, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 126 (1967), no. 2, 286–302. doi:10.1090/S0002-9947-1967-0206732-8.
  2. [Ban96]T. Banica, On the polar decomposition of circular variables, Integral Equations Operator Theory 24 (1996), 372–377. doi:10.1007/BF01204607.
  3. [Bla06]B. Blackadar, Operator Algebras: Theory of C^*-Algebras and von Neumann Algebras, Encyclopaedia of Mathematical Sciences, vol. 122, Springer, Berlin–Heidelberg, 2006. Author’s revised online text dated February 8, 2017. doi:10.1007/3-540-28517-2.
  4. [Cam09]J. M. Cameron, Hochschild cohomology of \mathrm{II}_1 factors with Cartan maximal abelian subalgebras, Proc. Edinburgh Math. Soc. 52 (2009), no. 2, 287–295. doi:10.1017/S0013091507000053.
  5. [CES87]E. Christensen, E. G. Effros, and A. M. Sinclair, Completely bounded multilinear maps and C^*-algebraic cohomology, Invent. Math. 90 (1987), no. 2, 279–296. doi:10.1007/BF01388706.
  6. [CPSS03]E. Christensen, F. Pop, A. M. Sinclair, and R. R. Smith, Hochschild cohomology of factors with property \Gamma, Ann. of Math. 158 (2003), no. 2, 635–659. doi:10.4007/annals.2003.158.635.
  7. [CS95]E. Christensen and A. M. Sinclair, Module mappings into von Neumann algebras and injectivity, Proc. London Math. Soc. (3) 71 (1995), no. 3, 618–640. doi:10.1112/plms/s3-71.3.618.
  8. [Dix53]J. Dixmier, Formes linéaires sur un anneau d’opérateurs, Bull. Soc. Math. France 81 (1953), 9–39. doi:10.24033/bsmf.1436.
  9. [Fur63]H. Furstenberg, Noncommuting random products, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 108 (1963), no. 3, 377–428. doi:10.1090/S0002-9947-1963-0163345-0.
  10. [Haa79]U. Haagerup, An example of a non nuclear C^*-algebra, which has the metric approximation property, Invent. Math. 50 (1979), 279–293. doi:10.1007/BF01410082.
  11. [JKR72]B. E. Johnson, R. V. Kadison, and J. R. Ringrose, Cohomology of operator algebras. III: Reduction to normal cohomology, Bull. Soc. Math. France 100 (1972), 73–96. doi:10.24033/bsmf.1731.
  12. [Kad66]R. V. Kadison, Derivations of operator algebras, Ann. of Math. (2) 83 (1966), no. 2, 280–293. doi:10.2307/1970433.
  13. [KR71a]R. V. Kadison and J. R. Ringrose, Cohomology of operator algebras. I: Type I von Neumann algebras, Acta Math. 126 (1971), 227–243. doi:10.1007/BF02392032.
  14. [KR71b]R. V. Kadison and J. R. Ringrose, Cohomology of operator algebras II. Extended cobounding and the hyperfinite case, Ark. Mat. 9 (1971), 55–63. doi:10.1007/BF02383637.
  15. [PS10]F. Pop and R. R. Smith, Vanishing of second cohomology for tensor products of type \mathrm{II}_1 von Neumann algebras, J. Funct. Anal. 258 (2010), 2695–2707. doi:10.1016/j.jfa.2010.01.013.
  16. [Pop95]S. Popa, Free-independent sequences in type \mathrm{II}_1 factors and related problems, in Recent advances in operator algebras—Orléans, 1992, Astérisque 232 (1995), 187–202. doi:10.24033/ast.318.
  17. [Pop14]S. Popa, Independence properties in subalgebras of ultraproduct \mathrm{II}_1 factors, J. Funct. Anal. 266 (2014), no. 9, 5818–5846. doi:10.1016/j.jfa.2014.02.004.
  18. [QS15]W. Qian and J. Shen, Hochschild cohomology of type \mathrm{II}_1 von Neumann algebras with Property \Gamma, Oper. Matrices 9 (2015), no. 3, 507–543. doi:10.7153/oam-09-31.
  19. [Sak66]S. Sakai, Derivations of W^*-algebras, Ann. of Math. (2) 83 (1966), no. 2, 273–279. doi:10.2307/1970432.
  20. [SS95]A. M. Sinclair and R. R. Smith, Hochschild Cohomology of von Neumann Algebras, London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, vol. 203, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511526190.
  21. [SS98a]A. M. Sinclair and R. R. Smith, Hochschild cohomology for von Neumann algebras with Cartan subalgebras, Amer. J. Math. 120 (1998), no. 5, 1043–1057. doi:10.1353/ajm.1998.0042.
  22. [SS98b]A. M. Sinclair and R. R. Smith, The Hochschild cohomology problem for von Neumann algebras, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95 (1998), no. 7, 3376–3379. doi:10.1073/pnas.95.7.3376.
  23. [Ume54]H. Umegaki, Conditional expectation in an operator algebra, Tohoku Math. J. (2) 6 (1954), nos. 2–3, 177–181. doi:10.2748/tmj/1178245177.
  24. [Voi90]D. Voiculescu, Circular and semicircular systems and free product factors, in Operator Algebras, Unitary Representations, Enveloping Algebras, and Invariant Theory, Progress in Mathematics, vol. 92, Birkhäuser, Boston, 1990, 45–60. Author’s text.