Plectis Atlas
Search

↑ and ↓ move, Enter opens, Esc closes.

Reading view

The Margulis–Platonov conjecture over number fields

OpenAI, 23 September 2026

PDFTeX source

Part of family 018: The Margulis–Platonov conjecture over global fields. Read it with its family

This page is converted from the paper’s TeX source. Atlas reconstructs statement numbers from the paper’s typesetting source (TeX). Use the original PDF if they differ. One figure is shown as a placeholder; see the PDF for it.

Abstract

We prove the Margulis–Platonov conjecture over number fields. For an absolutely almost simple simply connected group, every noncentral abstract normal subgroup of its rational points is the inverse image of an open normal subgroup of the product of its anisotropic nonarchimedean local groups.

1 Introduction

Let k be a number field and let G be an absolutely almost simple simply connected algebraic k-group. For a place v of k, write k_v for the completion. The local group G(k_v) has its usual topology. Let

A=A(G,k)=\{v\text{ nonarchimedean}:\rank_{k_v}G=0\}, \qquad H_A=\prod_{v\in A}G(k_v),

and let \delta_A:G(k)\to H_A be the diagonal homomorphism. The set A is finite. The product H_A is given its product topology; if A is empty, it is the trivial group.

The Margulis–Platonov conjecture asserts that the noncentral normal subgroups of G(k) are accounted for by this finite collection of compact local groups. Normal subgroups in this assertion are abstract: no topology or finite-generation condition is imposed on them. We prove the conjecture in this form.

Theorem 1.1. Let k be a number field and G an absolutely almost simple simply connected algebraic k-group. If N\triangleleft G(k) is not contained in Z(G(k)), then there is an open normal subgroup W\triangleleft H_A such that

N=\delta_A^{-1}(W).

Thus the result resolves the Margulis–Platonov conjecture positively over number fields, including globally anisotropic groups. In the case A=\varnothing, the conclusion is N=G(k), not merely that N has finite index or is dense in a local topology.

1.1 Background and significance

The problem joins two kinds of rigidity. At isotropic completions, generation by unipotent subgroups and simplicity modulo the center leave little room for normal quotients. At anisotropic nonarchimedean completions, compactness allows finite quotients and their open kernels. The assertion is that there is no additional abstract normal-subgroup obstruction invisible to these local factors.

The conjecture grew from Kneser’s quaternionic simplicity question and Platonov’s local-to-global simplicity proposal. Margulis formulated the description by open subgroups of the anisotropic finite local product [20, Russian original, Section 2.4.8]. Strong approximation and Margulis’s normal subgroup theorem supply the arithmetic framework and finite-index reduction [25, 21]. The isotropic case follows from the Kneser–Tits theorem over global fields; Gille’s account includes the final outer-E_6 cases, using work of Garibaldi and Chernousov–Timoshenko [14, Theorem 8.1]. For anisotropic groups, Chernousov proved projective simplicity of the rational points when the absolute rank is at least two and the group splits over a quadratic extension [5, Theorem 1]. Tomanov and Sury established substantial classical and low-index unitary cases [41, 40].

For inner type A, the arithmetic work of Platonov–Rapinchuk and Raghunathan [24, 28] preceded the reduction of Rapinchuk–Potapchik to finite simple quotients of the multiplicative group of a division algebra [31]. Segev obtained a commuting-graph obstruction, and Segev–Seitz verified the required finite-simple-group properties, completing this case [35, 36]. Rapinchuk–Segev–Seitz later proved that every finite quotient of the multiplicative group of a finite-dimensional division algebra is solvable [32]; Rapinchuk gave a shorter proof of the inner-A case using two-generation of finite simple groups [29]. The established cases are surveyed in [27, Sections 3.4–3.5]. They include isotropic groups and all inner forms of type A, as well as the other types outside the remaining anisotropic outer A, trialitarian D_4, and E_6 cases. We use that reduction in Theorem 2.1 and supply the remaining arguments here. In particular, the previously established inner-type-A theorem is available over every number field that occurs in a restriction-of-scalars subgroup.

The conjecture also enters the congruence subgroup problem: it is a normal-subgroup input to several descriptions of congruence kernels. That relationship does not justify using a theorem which assumes the conjecture to prove it. Our central-extension argument instead uses the unconditional finite-nonarchimedean injectivity in the metaplectic-kernel computation of Prasad and Rapinchuk [26, Proposition 2.6]. The distinction between metaplectic vanishing and congruence-kernel conclusions under the normal-subgroup hypothesis is also explicit in [30, Section 2].

1.2 A positive-density congruence consequence

Theorem 1.1 supplies the Margulis–Platonov hypothesis in Rapinchuk’s positive-density theorem, giving the following consequence.

Corollary 1.2 (Positive-density congruence subgroup property). Let k be a number field and G an absolutely almost simple simply connected algebraic k-group. Let M/k be the minimal Galois extension over which G becomes an inner form of the split group, and let \operatorname{Spl}(M/k) be the set of nonarchimedean places of k that split completely in M. Suppose that S is a set of places of k which contains all archimedean places, contains no nonarchimedean place v with \rank_{k_v}G=0, and satisfies

d_k\bigl(S\cap\operatorname{Spl}(M/k)\bigr)>0,

where d_k denotes Dirichlet density and the indicated density is assumed to exist. Then the S-congruence kernel is trivial:

C^S(G)=\{1\}.

Equivalently, for any fixed faithful k-defined representation of G, the associated group G(\mathcal O(S)) over the ring of S-integers has the classical congruence subgroup property: every finite-index normal subgroup contains a principal congruence subgroup of some nonzero ideal level.

Proof. Theorem 1.1 is the Margulis–Platonov statement assumed in [30, Theorem 1.1], for the same group and number field. The other hypotheses are exactly those imposed above, so that theorem gives C^S(G)=\{1\}. The equivalence with the classical congruence subgroup property is recalled in [30, Section 2].

For an inner form of the split group, M=k, and the density condition is positive Dirichlet density of the nonarchimedean places in S. The corollary is restricted to the stated positive-density range: it does not address Serre’s finite-S conjecture, arbitrary infinite S, or centrality or finiteness of congruence kernels outside that range.

1.3 The finite obstruction

We first prove that a noncentral normal subgroup N has finite index. Choose a positive integer e that annihilates the finite group G(k)/N, and let

R=G(k)^e=\langle g^e:g\in G(k)\rangle,\qquad P_0=\overline{\delta_A(R)},\qquad V_0=\delta_A^{-1}(P_0).

Here G(k)^e is the subgroup generated by powers, not just the set of powers. The group P_0 is open and normal in H_A. It remains to show that the finite group V_0/R is trivial. This is the distinction between the desired abstract equality and the closure statement furnished by approximation.

Section 2 develops two tools for this finite obstruction. First, it constructs representatives of a fixed coset modulo R satisfying specified local openings and avoiding a prescribed codimension-two reduction locus at almost all other places. The parameters are products of conjugates of torus powers. Scalar invariance permits an affine sieve while retaining control at the omitted approximation place; possible single poles are treated explicitly. Second, a signed permutation lattice calculation gives the Hasse principle and weak approximation for the norm torus needed to prescribe commuting elements with exact determinants.

1.4 Odd-degree division algebras

The first unresolved case is a special unitary group S=\SU(D,*), where D is an odd-degree central division algebra over a quadratic extension L/k and * is a unitary involution. Let U=\U(D,*) be its full unitary group. Section 3 proves that a nontrivial finite defect for S(k) yields one of two objects on U(k): a finite abelian character nonzero on S(k), or a homomorphism to a finite nonabelian simple group which is surjective on the defect preimage V_0. The commuting approximation and central-extension arguments are needed to obtain this dichotomy on the full unitary group. The class-preserving extension step adapts the inner-type argument of Rapinchuk–Potapchik [31, Section 2]; here the commuting approximation must also prescribe determinants. A quotient of a unitary subgroup need not extend to the multiplicative group of its algebra.

Section 4 rules out the first object. An algebraic difference function on D has enough exact elementary invariances to be constant on the required orbits. The exact additive span of U(k) in D, together with the known inner-type-A theorem and a real-signature interpolation argument, forces any finite abelian character to vanish on S(k).

Sections 5 and 6 rule out the second object. A finite simple quotient assigns a color to each rational unitary element. The distribution of these colors is not assumed continuous. We construct a translation-invariant probability law on their finite patterns whose individual color distributions are uniform. Fractional unitary transformations turn additive recurrence into a centralizer double-coset condition. A finite-simple-group lemma, stated in Section 5 and proved in Section 6, excludes that condition. Elementary transformations then force an impossible invariance under all left color translations.

The construction of the uniform-marginal law is an important part of the proof: additive averaging by itself need not preserve all colors. Conformal weights on rational points of a flag variety use Langlands’s Eisenstein-series convergence theorem [18]. Finite-volume harmonicity and Howe–Moore matrix-coefficient decay [15, 6] then provide the required marginals before additive averaging is performed. The later positive-density argument uses the multidimensional theorem of Furstenberg–Katznelson [12]. The uniform-marginal construction, the coset-preserving sieve, and the explicit norm-torus calculation are developed before the final case reductions so that their hypotheses and conclusions remain visible.

1.5 Completion of the proof

Section 7 proves the other outer-type-A cases by induction on reduced degree, simultaneously over all number fields. The ternary split-algebra case uses quadratic norm equations on a Châtelet surface. Even degree is reduced by a quaternion factorization and a smaller unitary centralizer, with a separate degree-four determinant correction. The approximation construction controls the finite places of the subgroups as they vary.

Section 8 treats D_4 by finding, in each relevant rational coset, a regular element whose torus admits a rational inverter. It is a product of two involutions, each already controlled inside a type-A_2 subgroup. Section 9 reduces a generic E_6 element to a simply connected D_4 subgroup and the cover of a root-involution centralizer of type A_1A_5. The last step is a torsor under a connected simply connected group, so its local factorizations can be globalized. The proof ends by returning to the original abstract subgroup N.

2 Finite quotients and approximation

The first objective is to isolate what local approximation does not already prove. Every noncentral normal subgroup has finite index, but its closure at the anisotropic finite places need not a priori recover the subgroup. We express this possible discrepancy as a finite quotient. We then develop two tools for eliminating it: an approximation procedure that retains the abstract rational coset, and a Hasse principle with weak approximation for a particular norm torus.

2.1 Conventions and established inputs

Throughout, k is a number field, V_k is its set of places, and G is an absolutely almost simple simply connected k-group. Write

A=\{v\in V_k:\ v\text{ is nonarchimedean and } \rank_{k_v}G=0\},\qquad G_A=\prod_{v\in A}G(k_v).

The diagonal homomorphism to this product is denoted by \delta. Thus G_A=H_A and \delta=\delta_A in the notation of the introduction. An empty product is the trivial group. The set A is finite: outside finitely many places the group has a reductive model and is unramified and quasi-split, hence has positive relative rank. At a nonarchimedean place an absolutely simple anisotropic group has type A.

For a finite set of places B, a subscript B on a rational element denotes its tuple of local images. Products over finitely many places have their ordinary product topology. In an adelic product we use the restricted product with respect to fixed integral compact open subgroups outside a finite set. Weak approximation means density at finitely many completions; strong approximation means density in the specified restricted adelic product.

For an integer e\geq 1, the notation

G(k)^e=\langle g^e:g\in G(k)\rangle

always denotes the abstract subgroup generated by the powers. No closure is included in this definition. Degrees of central simple algebras are reduced degrees; for example, \SL_1(M_r(\Delta)) has type A_{r\deg\Delta-1}. Restrictions of scalars will be treated over their defining extension fields when applying an induction or an approximation theorem.

We use the strong approximation theorem for simply connected absolutely almost simple groups: if G(k_w) is noncompact, then G(k) is dense in the adelic product away from w [25, Theorem 7.12]. We also use the lattice theorem for semisimple S-arithmetic groups [25, Theorem 5.7(1)], the normal subgroup theorem for irreducible S-arithmetic lattices of total rank at least two, and the local Kneser–Tits and simplicity theorems. In the last assertion, for a nonarchimedean v with positive rank, G(k_v) is perfect and G(k_v)/Z(G(k_v)) is abstractly simple. These results are used in their number-field forms [25, Chapters VII and IX][21, Chapter VIII, Theorem A].

We refer to the assertion of Theorem 1.1 for a particular group over a particular number field as (MP). We require the following established cases.

Theorem 2.1 (Known cases of (MP)). The assertion (MP) holds except possibly for anisotropic groups of outer type A, trialitarian type D_4, and type E_6. In particular it holds for every inner form of \SL_n, over every number field.

The formulation, including the results for multiplicative groups of division algebras that enter the inner type A case, is recalled in [27, Sections 3.4–3.5]. For the isotropic completion see [14, Theorem 8.1]; for inner type A see [31, 35, 36], with the subsequent strengthening in [32]. Thus, when we address one of the remaining types, we may assume that the group is anisotropic over its ground field.

We will also use the following form of the Hasse principle. A torsor under a k-group H means a principal homogeneous space for H over k.

Theorem 2.2 (Simply connected Hasse principle). Let H be a simply connected semisimple group over a number field k. Then H^1(k_v,H)=1 at every nonarchimedean place. A torsor X under H that has a point over every completion of k has a k-point. Moreover, X(k) is dense in \prod_{v\in B}X(k_v) for every finite set B of places.

The local and global vanishing assertions are the Kneser–Harder–Chernousov Hasse principle; we use the standard number-field statements in [25, Theorems 6.4 and 6.6]. For the last assertion, a rational point identifies X with H. Decompose H as a product of restrictions of scalars of simply connected absolutely almost simple groups. For each factor, choose an auxiliary split finite place outside the given approximation set and apply strong approximation away from it. This gives the stated weak approximation, also for products and restrictions of scalars.

We use the usual local and global theory of central simple algebras and involutions, including local Brauer invariants, the embedding criterion for fields, the Hasse–Schilling norm theorem, and the classification of hermitian forms [25, 33, 16]. When an etale algebra is a product of fields, norm and local arguments are understood factor by factor. All fields have characteristic zero unless they are explicitly residue fields. In root computations the roots of a simply laced system have squared length two. A superscript 1 on a multiplicative group denotes the kernel of the indicated norm.

2.2 The finite quotient not detected by closure

Proposition 2.3 (Finite-defect reduction). Every abstract noncentral normal subgroup of G(k) has finite index. Fix e\geq1, and put

R=G(k)^e,\qquad P_0=\overline{\delta(R)}\subset G_A,\qquad V_0=\delta^{-1}(P_0),\qquad V=V_0/R.

Then R has finite index, P_0 is open and normal in G_A, and V is finite. For every positive-rank nonarchimedean place w, the closure of R in the adelic product away from w is exactly the inverse image of P_0.

To prove (MP) for G, it suffices to show V=1 for every e. If \gamma\in V_0, representatives of \gamma R can be chosen arbitrarily close to 1 at any prescribed finite set of places. Away from A, these near-identity conditions may be replaced by arbitrary nonempty local open conditions. Finitely many nonempty Zariski open conditions may be imposed simultaneously.

Proof. Let N\lhd G(k) be noncentral, and choose a noncentral n\in N. Take a finite set T containing the archimedean places, A, the denominator places of n, and auxiliary split finite places whose total local rank is at least two. For fixed integral compact opens outside T, set

K^T=\prod_{v\notin T}G(\mathcal O_v),\qquad \Gamma=G(k)\cap K^T,

where changing finitely many integral models changes neither argument. The group \Gamma is the corresponding T-arithmetic group and contains n.

The lattice theorem [25, Theorem 5.7(1)] makes \Gamma a lattice in the product of the local groups at T. Remove its compact factors. This preserves discreteness: the inverse image of a compact subset of the remaining product is compact after the compact factors are restored, and hence meets \Gamma in finitely many points. It also preserves finite covolume. The rational embedding remains faithful. Strong approximation away from each noncompact factor supplies the projection density required for irreducibility. The S-arithmetic normal subgroup theorem now applies to \Gamma\cap N, which is normal and noncentral, and yields

[\Gamma:\Gamma\cap N]<\infty .

If one uses the formulation with a finite-normal-subgroup alternative, that alternative is central: the centralizer of a finite normal subgroup contains a finite-index Zariski-dense subgroup of \Gamma, and hence is all of the connected group G.

Strong approximation, omitting a positive-rank place in T, shows that \Gamma is dense in K^T. Thus the closure of \Gamma\cap N has finite index in K^T. It is closed, so it is open. It follows that the closure C of N in the restricted product away from T is open. It is normal because N is normal and G(k) is dense there.

Every place outside T has positive rank. For such a place v, the intersection C\cap G(k_v), with the local group supported at that single place, is an open normal subgroup. It cannot be central, since the center is finite. Local simplicity modulo center and perfectness give C\cap G(k_v)=G(k_v). Finite-support products are dense in the restricted product, so C is the whole restricted product. Given g\in G(k), we can therefore choose a\in N with ag\in K^T, and hence ag\in\Gamma. The map from \Gamma/(\Gamma\cap N) to G(k)/N is surjective. This proves the finite-index assertion.

The power map has differential e times the identity at 1; it is therefore dominant in characteristic zero. Rational points of a connected linear algebraic group over k are Zariski dense. Consequently R is Zariski dense and noncentral, so the preceding assertion applies to R. Density of G(k) in G_A follows from strong approximation away from an auxiliary positive-rank finite place. Since R has finite index, its closure P_0 has finite index in G_A, is normal, and is open.

Now omit any positive-rank finite place w. The closure C_w of R in the remaining adelic product is again closed, normal, and of finite index: finitely many translates of it already contain the dense subgroup G(k). Thus it is open. The local argument just given shows that C_w contains every positive-rank nonarchimedean factor. It contains every archimedean factor as well: the group of real points of a simply connected semisimple algebraic group is connected, and so is the group of complex points. Their maps into the finite discrete quotient by C_w are therefore trivial. Taking closures of finite-support products proves that C_w contains the kernel of the projection to G_A. Its image there is closed, contains \delta R, and is contained in P_0; hence it is exactly P_0. This proves the closure description.

For an original noncentral normal subgroup N, the finite quotient G(k)/N has some exponent e, so R\subset N. If V=1, then R=\delta^{-1}(P_0), and density gives an isomorphism

G(k)/R \simeq G_A/P_0 .

The normal subgroup N/R corresponds to a normal subgroup of this finite quotient. Its inverse image in G_A is an open normal subgroup W, and N=\delta^{-1}(W).

Finally, for \gamma\in V_0, the closure of \gamma R away from w is the same inverse image of P_0, since \gamma_A P_0=P_0. It contains the identity at the places in A and all tuples at other places. Choose w outside any prescribed finite approximation set to obtain the asserted local choices. Nonempty local open subsets are Zariski dense in the smooth connected group; intersecting one such opening with any additional nonempty Zariski open subset preserves nonemptiness. This supplies the last assertion.

The following consequence records exactly how an already established case of (MP) will be used for subgroups. In particular it does not require a finite homomorphism to be continuous in advance.

Lemma 2.4 (Restriction to a group satisfying (MP)). Let \psi:G(k)\to F_0 be a homomorphism to a finite group of exponent dividing e. Let f:H\to G be a k-homomorphism, where H is a product of restrictions of scalars of simply connected absolutely almost simple groups for which (MP) is known over their respective number fields. The homomorphism \psi\circ f on H(k) extends continuously to the product of the anisotropic finite local groups of those factors. Its image still has exponent dividing e. Consequently \psi(f(h))=1 if h is an e-th power at every one of these local factors.

Proof. For one absolutely almost simple factor, the kernel of the restricted finite homomorphism has finite index and is Zariski dense, so it is not central. By (MP) it is the inverse image of an open normal subgroup W_H of the anisotropic local product. Density identifies the rational quotient with the finite quotient by W_H. The homomorphism therefore extends through that quotient. For a product, extend the maps factor by factor. Their images commute, as they do on rational points, so the extensions combine. Apply this argument over the extension field for each restriction of scalars. The extended image is unchanged, and every local e-th power maps to 1.

2.3 An affine avoidance lemma

The closure calculation permits finitely many local conditions. The next argument supplies an additional condition at almost all finite places. It will be applied to an affine space of parameters, not to integral points of a torus. Codimension-two avoidance in affine space is an instance of arithmetic purity of strong approximation; see [4, Proposition 3.6] and [43, arXiv version, Lemma 1.1]. We give the fixed-direction version with an unbounded parameter at the omitted place needed below.

Lemma 2.5 (Avoidance along a line). Let E be an N-dimensional k-vector space, and let Z\subset E be closed of geometric codimension at least two. Choose d\in E(k)\setminus\{0\} whose point at infinity is outside the projective closure of Z, and let \pi:E\to E/kd be the quotient map. Fix a nonarchimedean place v_0, linear coordinates, and a rational linear section of \pi. Outside a finite set of model exceptions, require that these data give an integral direct sum E=kd\oplus E', with d an integral basis for the first summand, that \pi|_Z remains finite on reduction, and that every geometric fiber has cardinality at most D.

Let \Sigma be a finite set containing v_0, the archimedean places, those model exceptions, and all places with residue cardinality at most D. For every v\in\Sigma\setminus\{v_0\}, prescribe a nonempty open subset \mathcal O_v\subset E(k_v). There are a vector y\in E(k) and elements l\in k with |l|_{v_0} arbitrarily large such that a=y+ld belongs to \mathcal O_v at these prescribed places, is integral outside \Sigma, and its reduction avoids Z at every finite place outside \Sigma.

Proof. The condition on the point at infinity makes \pi|_Z finite. For example, extend the projection to projective space: the only indeterminacy is the chosen point at infinity, which is disjoint from the projective closure of Z. Over an affine point of the target, the only possible point at infinity on its fiber line is that same point. Thus the restricted morphism is proper and has finite fibers, and is finite. Its image Y\subset E/kd is closed and proper, since \dim Z\leq N-2<\dim(E/kd). Use the fixed linear coordinates and integral models; their exceptional places already belong to \Sigma.

Linear projection is open at each completion. Additive strong approximation away from v_0 gives

q\in (E/kd)(k)\setminus Y(k)

that is integral outside \Sigma and belongs to \pi(\mathcal O_v) at every prescribed place. To ensure q\notin Y, first shrink one of the prescribed nonempty openings in the quotient to miss Y; a proper algebraic subset has empty interior. Choose a rational linear lift y of q, integral outside \Sigma.

Because q\notin Y, its reduction belongs to the reduction of Y at only finitely many finite places outside \Sigma. Indeed a polynomial vanishing on Y, but not at q, is a nonzero integral value away from finitely many places. At each of the remaining exceptional places, the forbidden points in the fiber line number at most D. The residue field has more than D elements, so an integral value of l avoiding them exists. This is a nonempty local congruence condition on l. At a prescribed place v, the condition q\in\pi(\mathcal O_v) likewise gives a nonempty local open set of l with y+ld\in\mathcal O_v.

Apply additive strong approximation once more, now to l, imposing these finitely many conditions and integrality at all other finite places outside \Sigma. The local openings may be chosen relatively compact away from v_0. There are infinitely many such rational l, by density in the adeles away from v_0. They cannot all remain bounded at v_0, since the diagonal copy of k is discrete in its full adele ring. We may therefore choose |l|_{v_0} arbitrarily large. This gives all the assertions.

2.4 Approximation by abstract power factors

We now use anisotropy to make the unrestricted direction in Lemma 2.5 harmless at v_0. Assume G is k-anisotropic. Fix a maximal k-torus T_0\subset G, a finite Galois extension P/k splitting T_0 and any fixed auxiliary data, and a regular cocharacter \lambda:\bbG_{m,P}\to T_{0,P}. The map

\eta:\Res_{P/k}\bbG_m\longrightarrow T_0,\qquad \eta(a)=N_{P/k}\bigl(\lambda(a)\bigr) \tag{2.1}

is defined over k. Its restriction to the diagonal \bbG_m has cocharacter \sum_{\sigma\in\Gal(P/k)}\lambda^\sigma. This is a k-cocharacter and hence is zero by anisotropy. In particular

\eta(la)=\eta(a)\quad(l\in k^\times). \tag{2.2}

For x\in G(k), or for x in a fixed rational algebraic coset X=x_*G inside a larger linear algebraic group, consider

\Phi(a_1,\ldots,a_r) =x\prod_{j=1}^r k_j\eta(a_j)^e k_j^{-1}, \qquad k_j\in G(k),\quad a_j\in P^\times . \tag{2.3}

Its values lie in the same right coset xR, with R=G(k)^e. Its parameter domain is the open torus (\Res_{P/k}\bbG_m)^r in the affine k-space E=(\Res_{P/k}\bbA^1)^r. Over P, its boundary consists of the hyperplanes a_{j,\sigma}=0, one for each absolute coordinate.

We call a reduction a single-pole reduction if exactly one of these absolute coordinates vanishes. Away from the other hyperplanes, Equation 2.3 then takes the form

\Phi=g_L\,\lambda^\sigma(t)^e\,g_R, \qquad t=a_{j,\sigma}, \tag{2.4}

where the side factors are regular group- or coset-valued functions. At a good finite place with this reduction, Frobenius fixes the unique vanishing coordinate. Its action on the embeddings of the Galois extension P/k is regular. Thus the place splits completely in P, t has positive valuation, and the side factors are integral. The local analysis of Equation 2.4 may therefore be carried out in split coordinates.

Here is the precise criterion used in later sections. Its hypothesis about the single-pole configurations is substantive and will be verified in each application. A consecutive list of factors in Equation 2.3 is called a basic list if its product map is dominant and has surjective differential somewhere.

Proposition 2.6 (Power-factor approximation). Let G be k-anisotropic, with P, \eta, R, and X=x_*G as above. Fix \gamma\in G(k), the rational coset \mathcal C=x_*\gamma R\subset X(k), a geometrically codimension-at-least-two closed subset D\subset X, and a finite set B containing the archimedean places, A, and the exceptions for fixed integral models and sufficiently small residue fields. Include in B a positive-rank finite place v_0. At B prescribe nonempty local open conditions compatible with the closure of \mathcal C in Proposition 2.3.

At each finite place outside B, prescribe an allowed set \mathcal U_v\subset X(k_v). Assume:

  1. 1.

    every integral point whose reduction avoids D belongs to \mathcal U_v;

  2. 2.

    \mathcal U_v contains a nonempty local open set;

  3. 3.

    single-pole configurations are tested by finitely many algebraic nonvanishing conditions over P, independent of v. Their nonemptiness is compatible with the following order of choices. First choose at least two disjoint basic lists, with their conjugator tuple in a nonempty Zariski open subset of its product of copies of G. For each such tuple there is a nonempty Zariski open subset of X in which to choose x. After x is fixed, for every finite number of additional factors there is a nonempty Zariski open subset of the corresponding product of copies of G in which to choose their conjugators. For every tuple allowed by these successive choices, the tests restrict to a nonempty open subset of each absolute boundary hyperplane away from the others. They guarantee membership in \mathcal U_v at a single-pole reduction, outside finitely many model exceptions for the fixed data.

In the third condition the tests are imposed with all their Galois conjugates. Appending additional factors is required to preserve the tests on an existing hyperplane when the new parameters are set to 1. Thus their insertion does not remove the previously available open subsets. The additional factors permit the local moves required by the second condition.

Then there is x'\in\mathcal C satisfying the prescribed conditions at B and belonging to \mathcal U_v for every finite v\notin B. Finitely many nonempty Zariski open conditions on the initial representative and conjugators can be included in their choice, provided they are compatible with the third condition.

Proof. We give the construction in an order that keeps the finite model exceptions separate from the infinitely many avoidance conditions. When the preliminary choices enlarge B, use at each newly added place a nonempty opening inside \mathcal U_v, as supplied by the second hypothesis. Such places lie outside A, so these added conditions are compatible with the coset closure. Meeting them preserves the conclusion requested for the original B.

Dominant parameter lists. The adjoint translates of the differential of a nonzero cocharacter span \Lie(G): their span is a nonzero adjoint-invariant subspace of the simple Lie algebra. Since G(k) is Zariski dense, finitely many rational conjugators make the product of their \eta^e-maps have surjective differential at some point. Such a product map is dominant. Choose at least two disjoint consecutive lists with this property in the nonempty open set supplied by the third hypothesis. We may intersect that set with any further prescribed nonempty Zariski open conditions. The product of copies of G is geometrically irreducible, so such intersections remain nonempty.

On the open parameter torus the total product map is smooth whenever one of its basic list maps is smooth. Each list has a proper closed nonsmooth locus. Since the two lists have disjoint parameter sets, their simultaneous nonsmooth locus has codimension at least two. The inverse image of D has codimension at least two on the smooth locus, and any remaining part lies in that same codimension-two nonsmooth locus. Therefore its closure in E has codimension at least two. Adding further independent lists does not change this conclusion.

We also need a residue-field observation about one fixed basic list. After discarding finitely many model exceptions, its dominance persists on reduction. For any integral translating point x, the inverse image of the dense open X\setminus D is a nonempty open in its affine parameter space. The equations excluded here, including the norm equations defining the torus boundary, have bounded degree independently of the translating point. The elementary bound for zeros of a nonzero polynomial over a finite field therefore supplies a rational parameter in this open whenever the residue field is sufficiently large. Thus unit parameters in one basic list, all other parameters set to 1, can give a reduction outside D. Put these fixed exceptions and small residue fields into B.

The initial point and its denominator places. Choose x\in\mathcal C satisfying the conditions at B, using Proposition 2.3; to approximate also at v_0, omit a different positive-rank place. Any prescribed compatible Zariski open conditions can be included; in particular, take x in the open subset supplied by the third hypothesis after the basic conjugators have been fixed. Let B_1 be the finite set of places outside B where x is not integral. At each such place choose a nonempty open subset of \mathcal U_v.

The local normal subgroup generated by \eta((P\otimes_k k_v)^\times)^e is all of G(k_v). Indeed this image is Zariski noncentral, as can be seen in the independent absolute coordinates, and local simplicity modulo center and perfectness apply. Every element of that generated subgroup is a finite product of conjugates of such powers; inverse factors are again of the same form. Consequently finitely many extra lists can move x_v into the chosen opening at each v\in B_1. Fix the finite number of factors needed for these moves, padding the local lists by factors with parameter 1 where necessary. The third hypothesis supplies a nonempty Zariski open subset for this whole tuple of extra conjugators, with the initial x and basic conjugators unchanged. Each product of the required local openings is Zariski dense and hence meets this subset. Choose their conjugators globally by strong approximation away from v_0, approximating the required local conjugators and remaining integral outside B\cup B_1. Additional nonempty Zariski open conditions are compatible with this choice. The basic parameters can be taken near 1 on B\cup B_1; the extra parameters can be taken near 1 on B. We now have nonempty open conditions on the full affine parameter space at every place of B\cup B_1.

The closed subset to be avoided. Fix the constants just chosen. In E, let Z be the union of the closure of \Phi^{-1}(D), intersections of distinct boundary hyperplanes, and the excluded proper closed subsets of each individual hyperplane from the third hypothesis. Take all Galois conjugates, so Z is defined over k. Every component has codimension at least two: this was proved for the first part, is immediate for the intersections, and follows from nonemptiness of the specified open tests for the last part. For parameters integral at a good place and reducing outside Z, there are exactly two possibilities. Either every torus coordinate is a unit and \Phi is integral with reduction outside D, or there is one pole and its prescribed open test holds. In both cases \Phi belongs to \mathcal U_v.

The direction and the residual exceptions. Choose a rational direction d=(d_1,\ldots,d_r)\in E(k) whose point at infinity avoids the projective closure of Z. Choose each d_j sufficiently close to 1 at v_0 so that \Phi(d) still satisfies the prescribed condition there. These requirements are compatible: avoiding a proper algebraic subset is dense in any local open set. The projection along d, its linear splitting, the tests defining Z, and the fiber bound introduce only finitely many further exceptions. They are fixed before the quotient point in the sieve is chosen.

At a new exceptional place outside B\cup B_1, the point x and all conjugators are integral. Use the residue-field observation for a basic list to choose unit parameters giving reduction outside D, and take the extra parameters near 1. This provides a nonempty local opening where \Phi\in\mathcal U_v, even though the projection or single-pole model might be unusable there. Any additional small residue fields needed for the fiber bound are treated in exactly this way; the smaller fields for which the basic-list observation itself fails already lie in B. Let \Sigma contain B\cup B_1 and all these residual exceptions.

We can now apply Lemma 2.5 with the parameter openings just specified, omitting the condition at v_0. It gives parameters a=y+ld, integral outside \Sigma, reducing outside Z there, and meeting all the openings at \Sigma\setminus\{v_0\}. As |l|_{v_0}\to\infty, Equation 2.2 gives

\eta(a_j)=\eta(d_j+l^{-1}y_j)\longrightarrow\eta(d_j).

For sufficiently large |l|_{v_0}, every a_j is nonzero and \Phi(a) satisfies the required condition at v_0. It satisfies the conditions at all other exceptional places by construction, and lies in \mathcal U_v elsewhere by avoidance of Z. Finally \Phi(a)\in xR=\mathcal C, since every factor in Equation 2.3 is an abstract e-th power. This completes the construction.

The proposition allows poles, but only in a controlled form at places that split completely in P. In particular, it makes no assertion that the torus parameters can be integral units everywhere. The later applications will specify D, prove the nonemptiness of every single-pole test, and check its local consequence.

2.5 Cohomology detected on cyclic subgroups

Our final preliminary tool solves simultaneous norm equations with prescribed local approximations. We first separate the arithmetic duality input from the finite-group calculation.

For a discrete Galois module M, write

\Sha^i(k,M)= \ker\left(H^i(k,M)\longrightarrow\prod_{v\in V_k}H^i(k_v,M)\right).

The notation \Sha_\omega^i(k,M) means classes whose localizations vanish at all but finitely many places. For a group H, the degree-one notation has its pointed-set meaning. Galois cohomology and its cochains are continuous throughout. A lattice is a finitely generated free abelian group with a continuous Galois action, which necessarily has finite image.

Lemma 2.7 (Cyclic detection). Let M be a k-lattice split by a finite Galois extension P/k, and put \Gamma=\Gal(P/k). Inflation identifies \Sha_\omega^2(k,M) with

\ker\left( H^2(\Gamma,M)\longrightarrow \prod_{C\subset\Gamma\ {\rm cyclic}}H^2(C,M) \right).

If this group is zero and T is a k-torus with character lattice M, every everywhere locally soluble torsor under T has a rational point and satisfies weak approximation.

Proof. Over P the action on M is trivial. The exact sequence with rational coefficients identifies

H^2(P,M)\simeq H^1(P,M\otimes(\bbQ/\bbZ)).

The right side consists of continuous finite-image characters. If a class is locally zero almost everywhere, its restriction to P is zero by Chebotarev. Moreover H^1(P,M)=0, since a continuous homomorphism from a profinite group to a torsion-free discrete abelian group has finite, hence trivial, image. Inflation–restriction therefore identifies such a class with a unique class in H^2(\Gamma,M).

At a place unramified in P, the decomposition group is cyclic. Local inflation is injective by the same vanishing of degree-one cohomology over the splitting field. Chebotarev realizes, up to conjugacy, every element of \Gamma as a Frobenius element. Thus local vanishing almost everywhere is equivalent to vanishing on every cyclic subgroup. Conversely, a class with those cyclic restrictions zero is locally zero at every unramified place, which proves the identification.

Torus duality identifies the Hasse-principle obstruction for torsors under T with the dual of \Sha^2(k,M), and controls the weak approximation defect of T by \Sha_\omega^2(k,M) [34, Proposition 9.8 and Corollary 8.14]. The stated vanishing therefore gives a rational point on every locally soluble torsor and weak approximation on T. Translation by that rational point gives weak approximation on the torsor.

To calculate this kernel, it is convenient to use extensions by lattices. The following lemma will also apply when the finite group is not a direct product.

Lemma 2.8 (A central sign element). Let \Gamma be a finite group and M a torsion-free \Gamma-lattice. Suppose that c\in Z(\Gamma) has order two and acts on M as multiplication by -1. An extension

1\longrightarrow M\longrightarrow E \longrightarrow\Gamma\longrightarrow1

determines a class \beta(E)\in H^1(\Gamma/\langle c\rangle,M/2M), and this class is zero if and only if the extension splits. If the restriction to the subgroup generated by an involution r\in\Gamma splits, the value at the image of r of every cocycle representing \beta(E) lifts to an element d_r\in M with (1+r)d_r=0.

Proof. Write the subgroup M additively, with translations on the left. Let z lift c. Since z^2\in M commutes with z, it lies in M^c=0; hence z is an involution. Choose lifts s_g of g\in\Gamma, with s_1=1, and write

s_gs_h=f(g,h)s_{gh},\qquad z s_gz^{-1}=d_gs_g.

Comparing the two expressions for the conjugate of s_gs_h gives

d_{gh}=d_g+g d_h+2f(g,h).

Thus g\mapsto d_g\bmod 2M is a cocycle. Replacing s_g by a_gs_g replaces d_g by d_g-2a_g. Replacing z by az replaces d_g by d_g+(1-g)a, a coboundary change modulo two. Choose s_c=z; then d_c=0, and the cocycle descends to \Gamma/\langle c\rangle, whose action on M/2M is well defined.

If its class is zero, change z so that all d_g are even, and then replace s_g by (d_g/2)s_g. All these lifts commute with z. The centralizer C_E(z) consequently maps onto \Gamma, and its kernel is M^c=0. The inverse of this isomorphism is a splitting. A splitting plainly gives the zero class. Finally, if s_r is an involutive lift of r, conjugating its square by z gives (1+r)d_r=0. Changing the cocycle by a coboundary replaces this lift of its value by d_r+(1-r)a for some a\in M, and preserves the identity because (1+r)(1-r)a=0.

2.6 The simultaneous norm torus

Lemma 2.9 (Hasse principle and approximation for a norm torus). Let L/k be quadratic, let F/k be separable of degree m\geq3, and suppose that the normal closure of F, jointly with L, has Galois group S_m\times C_2, with its natural action on the embeddings of F. Set

T=\ker\left( \Res_{F/k}\bigl(\Res^1_{LF/F}\bbG_m\bigr) \xrightarrow{\,N_{LF/L}\,}\Res^1_{L/k}\bbG_m \right).

This kernel is a torus. Every torsor under T with points over all completions has a rational point, and its rational points are dense at any prescribed finite set of completions.

Proof. Let c denote the generator of the second factor C_2. On character lattices the norm map is the diagonal inclusion

\bbZ_{\mathrm{sign}}\longrightarrow \bbZ^m\otimes\mathrm{sign}_{C_2}.

It is primitive. Thus its cokernel is torsion-free, the kernel of the norm map is connected, and its character lattice is

M=(\bbZ^m/\bbZ\mathbf1)\otimes\mathrm{sign}_{C_2}. \tag{2.5}

Here S_m permutes the coordinates and c acts by -1. By Lemma 2.7, it suffices to split every extension of S_m\times C_2 by M that splits over all cyclic subgroups.

Fix such an extension. Lemma 2.8 gives a class

\beta\in H^1(S_m,M/2M).

We show that \beta=0. Put

V_m=\bbF_2^m,\qquad Q_m=V_m/\bbF_2\mathbf1=M/2M .

The permutation-module sequence

0\longrightarrow\bbF_2\mathbf1 \longrightarrow V_m\longrightarrow Q_m\longrightarrow0

has a connecting map

H^1(S_m,Q_m)\longrightarrow H^2(S_m,\bbF_2).

By Shapiro’s lemma, the preceding map on degree-one cohomology is the restriction

H^1(S_m,\bbF_2)\longrightarrow H^1(S_{m-1},\bbF_2).

It is an isomorphism for m\geq3: both sides are generated by the permutation sign character. Therefore the connecting map is injective. Its image consists of classes whose restriction to the point stabilizer S_{m-1} is zero.

Let \widehat S_m be the central extension by \bbF_2 corresponding to the image of \beta, and denote its nonidentity central kernel element by \zeta. It splits on each point stabilizer, by conjugacy. Consequently every transposition has involutive lifts. For m\geq5, two disjoint transpositions fix a common point, so their lifts commute. For m=3 there is no disjoint pair of Coxeter generators to consider.

In either of these cases, choose involutive lifts t_i of the adjacent transpositions (i,i+1). Write

(t_it_{i+1})^3=\zeta^{\epsilon_i}, \qquad \epsilon_i\in\bbF_2 .

Multiplying t_i by \zeta^{a_i}, with a_1=0 and a_{i+1}=a_i+\epsilon_i, makes all these cubes equal to 1. It does not change the squares or the commutation of distant generators. The Coxeter presentation of S_m therefore gives a splitting of \widehat S_m. By injectivity of the connecting map, \beta=0.

It remains to treat m=4, where disjoint transpositions have no common fixed point. The only remaining Coxeter relation is commutation of lifts of \tau=(12) and \nu=(34). Fix the sign lift z in the proof of Lemma 2.8, and use the cocycle g\mapsto d_g\bmod2M produced there. Choose representatives b(g)\in\bbF_2^4 of its values, with b(1)=0. Its connecting factor set is given by

\epsilon(g,h)\mathbf1=b(g)+g b(h)-b(gh).

Since \tau\nu=\nu\tau, failure of their lifts to commute would give

(1+\nu)b(\tau)+(1+\tau)b(\nu)=\mathbf1 . \tag{2.6}

We now return to the original extension by the lattice M, not the central extension \widehat S_4. Its restriction to \langle\tau\rangle splits by hypothesis. Replace the chosen lift of \tau by an involutive lift. This changes its translation parameter by twice an element of M, so the fixed cocycle modulo two is unchanged. By Lemma 2.8, the associated translation parameter d\in M satisfies (1+\tau)d=0, and its reduction represents \beta(\tau). Choose an integral representative \widetilde d\in\bbZ^4. For some a\in\bbZ we have

\widetilde d+\tau\widetilde d=a\mathbf1, \qquad 2\widetilde d_3=a=2\widetilde d_4.

Hence \widetilde d_3=\widetilde d_4. Every representative b(\tau) has equal third and fourth coordinates: adding a diagonal vector modulo two preserves that equality. The third and fourth coordinates of (1+\nu)b(\tau) are therefore zero, while those of (1+\tau)b(\nu) are zero because \tau fixes them. This contradicts Equation 2.6. The disjoint lifts commute after all, and the same Coxeter-generator adjustment splits \widehat S_4. Thus \beta=0 also for m=4.

In every degree m\geq3, Lemma 2.8 now splits the original lattice extension. Lemma 2.7 gives \Sha_\omega^2(k,M)=0 and the asserted Hasse principle and weak approximation.

We have obtained two distinct kinds of control. The approximation procedure chooses a representative inside a fixed abstract coset while controlling its local centralizers. The norm-torus lemma then solves the simultaneous norm equations in those centralizers. The next section uses this combination to construct commuting rational elements with specified determinants.

3 Finite quotients of an odd-degree unitary group

We now consider the first remaining family: special unitary groups defined by division algebras of odd reduced degree. The finite defect constructed in Proposition 2.3 is a quotient of a finite-index normal subgroup of the special unitary group. The purpose of this section is to use a nontrivial simple quotient of that defect to construct a homomorphism defined on the full unitary group. The abelian and nonabelian alternatives will then be excluded separately.

Let L/k be a quadratic extension of number fields, let D be a central simple L-algebra of reduced degree n, and let * be a unitary involution on D. Write

S=\SU(D,*),\qquad U=\U(D,*),\qquad L^1=\{a\in L^\times:a\bar a=1\},

where the bar is the nontrivial automorphism of L/k. The determinant homomorphism on U is the reduced norm:

\det=\Nrd_{D/L}:U(k)\longrightarrow L^1, \qquad S(k)=\ker(\det).

Fix i\in L^\times with \bar i=-i. On a dense open subset of the k-vector space of Hermitian elements, the Cayley map

x\longmapsto (x+i)(x-i)^{-1},\qquad x=x^*, \tag{3.1}

is a birational parametrization of U. In particular, U(k) satisfies weak approximation: first perturb finitely many local targets into this open chart and then approximate their inverse Cayley coordinates.

We recall the relevant local descriptions of these groups [25, 33, 16]. At a nonsplit nonarchimedean place of L/k, the algebra D splits. Indeed, the existence of the unitary involution makes its Brauer corestriction zero [16, Theorem 3.1(2)], and corestriction for a local field extension preserves the local Brauer invariant. A Hermitian form of dimension at least three over a quadratic extension of nonarchimedean local fields is isotropic. Thus, when n\geq3, the finite places where S has rank zero are split places of L/k. At each such place v, choose one of the two components of D\otimes_k k_v and denote it by \mathcal D_v. It is a central division algebra of degree n over k_v, the involution exchanges the two components, and

U(k_v)=\mathcal D_v^\times, \qquad S(k_v)=\SL_1(\mathcal D_v). \tag{3.2}

Under this identification, the local determinant is the reduced norm on \mathcal D_v.

For the rest of this section assume that D is a division algebra and that n\geq3 is odd. Then S is k-anisotropic. Let A be its finite set of anisotropic nonarchimedean places and use the notation of Proposition 2.3:

R=S(k)^e,\qquad P_0=\overline{\delta(R)}\subset S_A, \qquad V_0=\delta^{-1}(P_0),\qquad V=V_0/R, \tag{3.3}

where e\geq1, S_A=\prod_{v\in A}S(k_v), and the power subgroup is abstract. Finally, put A_0=\det U(k)\subset L^1. An empty product over A is the trivial group throughout.

Proposition 3.1 (Finite quotient dichotomy). Suppose that the finite group V in Equation (3.3) is nontrivial. Then at least one of the following exists:

  1. (i)

    a homomorphism \chi:U(k)\to C to a finite abelian group such that \chi(S(k))\ne1;

  2. (ii)

    a homomorphism \phi:U(k)\to\mathcal F to a finite nonabelian simple group such that

    \phi(V_0)=\mathcal F,\qquad R\subset\ker\phi.

The first step is an approximation statement that retains both commutativity and exact determinants. Its second part is also required to retain a specified coset modulo the abstract subgroup R.

3.1 Commuting approximation

Proposition 3.2. With the preceding notation, the following statements hold.

  1. (i)

    Let a,b\in A_0. For every v\in A, suppose that x_v,t_v\in U(k_v) commute and have determinants a_v,b_v. There exist commuting x',t\in U(k) with \det x'=a and \det t=b whose A-components approximate the prescribed pair arbitrarily closely.

  2. (ii)

    Let \gamma\in V_0 and h\in U(k). There exist commuting x',t\in U(k) with

    x'\in\gamma R,\qquad \det t=\det h,

    and with t_A arbitrarily close to h_A.

Proof. For part (ii), set a=1 and b=\det h, so that a,b denote the two prescribed determinants in either part. We construct a regular first element x' whose centralizer has enough local determinant norms everywhere. Lemma 2.9 will then produce the second element in that centralizer with its prescribed determinant and approximations.

Local choices at the prescribed places. At v\in A, a commuting pair in \mathcal D_v^\times lies in a common maximal subfield. This is because the algebra it generates is a commutative domain in a division algebra, and hence a field, which can be extended to a maximal subfield. In the corresponding maximal torus of U(k_v), perturb the first element within its fixed-determinant fiber until it is regular. Such regular elements are dense in that fiber: geometrically the fiber is a translate of

\{(z_1,\ldots,z_n)\in\bbG_m^n:z_1\cdots z_n=1\},

and no equality z_r=z_s holds identically on it. These fibers are smooth, so their nonempty Zariski opens are dense in the local topology. The conjugation map around a regular semisimple element is a local submersion. Consequently, sufficiently small changes of this first element have centralizer tori obtained by conjugation with elements arbitrarily close to 1. Conjugating the second element with the same elements retains its determinant and its prescribed approximation.

For part (ii), take the first local element sufficiently close to 1 in a maximal torus containing h_v, and with determinant 1. The choice near 1 is compatible with the closure of \gamma R because \gamma\in V_0. The same regular perturbation applies. Hence in both parts we have nonempty open conditions for the first element such that its local centralizer admits the required second element.

Enlarge the finite set of prescribed places to include all archimedean places, places of bad reduction or small residue characteristic, places ramified in L/k, and places where a or b is not a unit. At every additional place choose a maximal torus whose determinant image contains both required determinants. At nonsplit places the algebra splits, and a diagonal unitary torus has determinant image equal to the local norm-one group. At a split finite place outside A, write the chosen component of the algebra as M_l(\Delta). If \Delta is nontrivial, then l\geq2: use an unramified maximal subfield of \Delta in one diagonal block and a totally ramified maximal subfield in another. Their product norm image contains all units and an element of valuation one, and is therefore all of k_v^\times. Complete these two blocks to a maximal étale subalgebra. If \Delta=k_v, the usual diagonal torus suffices. At split archimedean places the algebra is split because its degree is odd. In each case we may choose the first element regular with the specified determinant and then take a sufficiently small opening around it.

We also prescribe finitely many auxiliary split places, outside all exceptions, at which the algebra splits and a,b are units. Choose unramified maximal tori having every possible permutation cycle type in S_n, one type at each such place. Norms from their unramified field factors cover the unit group. These conditions will force the joint Galois group needed by Lemma 2.9.

In part (i), the determinant-a slice is a rational translate of S because a\in A_0. Weak approximation for S, followed by Proposition 2.6 on that translate, permits all the local openings just chosen. In part (ii), apply that proposition in the coset \gamma R. The openings near 1 at A are allowed by Equation (3.3) and the closure statement in Proposition 2.3; the other local openings are unrestricted. We now check the reduction and pole conditions required by Proposition 2.6.

Integral reductions and single poles. At an integral reduction outside the prescribed set, exclude matrices whose characteristic polynomial has no simple root over an algebraic closure of the residue field. This exclusion has geometric codimension at least two in a fixed nonzero determinant slice of \GL_n. Indeed, if every eigenvalue has multiplicity at least two, there are at most \lfloor n/2\rfloor distinct eigenvalues. After fixing the determinant, they contribute at most \lfloor n/2\rfloor-1 parameters. For each Jordan type with fixed eigenvalues, the orbit dimension is at most n^2-n. Thus the excluded set has dimension at most

n^2-n+\lfloor n/2\rfloor-1 \leq (n^2-1)-2.

There are only finitely many Jordan types, so the same bound holds for their union and its closure. These conditions descend to the unitary determinant slice and spread out after finitely many model exceptions.

A simple absolute residue root belongs to a residue-field irreducible factor of multiplicity one. Hensel lifting gives an unramified field factor of the algebra generated by the first element. We do not need the simple root itself to lie in the ground residue field.

At a single pole in Proposition 2.6, the place splits in the fixed splitting field and the first element has the form

x'=g_L\,\diag(t^{e d_1},\ldots,t^{e d_n})\,g_R, \qquad d_1<\cdots<d_n,

where \ord_v(t)>0 and the two side factors are integral and invertible. Require every principal minor on the first j indices of g_Rg_L to be nonzero modulo the place, for 1\leq j\leq n. This is a nonempty open condition on each pole hyperplane: an undamaged basic parameter list in Proposition 2.6 is dominant, so its varying side factor can meet the finitely many principal-minor opens. If c_j is the jth elementary characteristic coefficient, principal minor expansion gives

\ord_v(c_j)=e(d_1+\cdots+d_j)\ord_v(t). \tag{3.4}

The term from the first j indices is the unique term of least valuation. The successive Newton slopes are strictly distinct and all segments have horizontal length one. The characteristic polynomial therefore splits into distinct linear factors over k_v.

The additional denominator places in the approximation procedure admit the same determinant-compatible local tori described above. At the later finite model exceptions, integral unit parameters giving regular reduction provide the required openings. This checks all hypotheses of Proposition 2.6.

The global centralizer and its norm torsor. Choose x' by that proposition, also imposing global regularity. Since D is division,

E=L(x')\subset D

is a maximal field of degree n over L. It is stable under * because (x')^*=(x')^{-1}. Put F=\{z\in E:z^*=z\}, the fixed field. Then E=LF and [F:k]=n.

Let \Gamma\subset S_n\times C_2 be the Galois group of the normal closure of F together with L, acting on the embeddings of F and on L. At the auxiliary places split in L, the prescribed cycle types show that the kernel of \Gamma\to C_2 meets every conjugacy class of S_n. A proper subgroup of a finite group cannot have this property: the transitive action on its cosets would have a derangement, by averaging the number of fixed cosets, whereas every conjugacy class meeting the subgroup would rule out all derangements. Hence that kernel is S_n\times\{1\}. The projection to C_2 is surjective, so

\Gamma=S_n\times C_2.

The unitary torus in the centralizer of x' is

T_E=\Res_{F/k}\bigl(\Res^1_{E/F}\bbG_m\bigr),

and its determinant is N_{E/L}:T_E\to\Res^1_{L/k}\bbG_m. At all prescribed places its image contains b_v by construction. At every other integral place, take the full *-orbit of the unramified field factor of E found above; all its fields are unramified over k_v since L/k is unramified here. Its fixed algebra is an unramified field factor F_j/k_v of F\otimes_k k_v: it is the fixed field when the factor is stable, and the diagonal fixed algebra when two factors are exchanged. The corresponding *-stable algebra is F_j\otimes_{k_v}(L\otimes_k k_v), possibly split, so no individual E-factor is required to be *-stable. Restrict the norm map to this factor. It is a surjective map of unramified tori with connected kernel. To check connectedness, over an algebraic closure the dual map sends a generator to a vector with entries 1 or -1; this vector is primitive. Lang’s theorem on the residue-field tori and smooth lifting show that the norm map is onto integral points. As b_v is a unit, it is a local determinant norm. At a single pole the torus splits by Equation (3.4), and the same conclusion holds without an integrality restriction.

Thus the fiber N_{E/L}^{-1}(b) has points everywhere locally. Its acting kernel is exactly the torus of Lemma 2.9, with the joint Galois group just verified. That lemma gives a rational point t in the fiber approximating the chosen local second elements at A. It belongs to the centralizer of x', so x' and t commute. The construction retained the required determinant and, in part (ii), the coset \gamma R. This proves both assertions.

3.2 A simple quotient preserved by the full unitary group

The passage from class preservation to a quotient of the ambient group follows the inner-type argument of Rapinchuk–Potapchik [31, Corollary 2.3 and Theorem 2.4]. Here Proposition 3.2 supplies the required unitary input. Conjugation by U(k) preserves R, since R is characteristic in S(k). It also preserves P_0 and V_0 by passage to local closures. In fact the resulting action on V preserves each conjugacy class. To see this, take \gamma\in V_0 and h\in U(k). By Proposition 3.2(ii), choose x'\in\gamma R commuting with t, with \det t=\det h and t_A sufficiently close to h_A that t h^{-1}\in V_0. In V, conjugation by t fixes the image of x', whereas t h^{-1} induces an inner automorphism. Conjugation by h consequently carries \gamma R to a conjugate of itself.

If V\ne1, choose a maximal proper normal subgroup of V and denote the resulting simple quotient by B. Its kernel is invariant under the U(k) action because a normal subgroup is a union of conjugacy classes. The induced automorphisms of B are class-preserving. If B is nonabelian, the theorem of Feit and Seitz [10, Theorem C] says that every such automorphism is inner. Since a nonabelian simple group has trivial center, the identification \Inn(B)=B gives

\phi:U(k)\longrightarrow B.

Its restriction to V_0 is the quotient map to B, and R acts trivially. This is alternative (ii) of Proposition 3.1.

It remains to treat the case that B is cyclic of prime order. Let R' be its kernel upstairs, so that

R\subset R'\subset V_0,\qquad B=V_0/R'. \tag{3.5}

Class preservation on this abelian quotient means that the action is trivial. Thus R' is normal in U(k) and B is central in U(k)/R'. The rest of the section uses a nonzero character of this central subgroup to construct a finite character of U(k) that is nonzero on S(k).

3.3 Local abelianization and the metaplectic input

We need two local facts: the continuous characters of the compact groups S(k_v), and a splitting theorem for their finite product. The first fact also identifies the closed subgroup generated by commutators of the full local multiplicative group.

Lemma 3.3. Let F_v be a nonarchimedean local field of characteristic zero, with residue field \bbF_q, and let \mathcal D be a central division algebra over F_v of odd degree n\geq3. Put S_v=\SL_1(\mathcal D). Reduction induces an isomorphism

S_v/\overline{[S_v,S_v]} \simeq T_v:=\ker\bigl(N_{\bbF_{q^n}/\bbF_q}: \bbF_{q^n}^\times\to\bbF_q^\times\bigr).

Moreover,

\overline{[\mathcal D^\times,\mathcal D^\times]}=S_v.

If an element of \mathcal D^\times has reduced-norm valuation r, its action on T_v is \sigma^r, where \sigma:z\mapsto z^{q^h} for some h relatively prime to n.

Proof. Use the cyclic description of a division algebra over a local field [33]. There is an unramified maximal subfield E_v/F_v and a prime element \Pi such that conjugation by \Pi induces a generator \sigma of \Gal(E_v/F_v). The residue algebra is \bbF_{q^n} and \sigma acts there by q^h with (h,n)=1. Normalize valuations so that \ord_v(\Nrd\Pi)=1. Every element of S_v is integral and its residue lies in T_v. The Teichmüller representatives in E_v lift T_v to a subgroup of S_v, so reduction onto T_v is surjective.

Let \mathfrak P=(\Pi) be the maximal ideal of the maximal order of \mathcal D, and set

S_r=S_v\cap(1+\mathfrak P^r),\qquad r\geq1.

In leading-coefficient coordinates, the quotients of this filtration are

S_r/S_{r+1}\simeq \begin{cases} (\bbF_{q^n},+),&n\nmid r,\\ \ker\Tr_{\bbF_{q^n}/\bbF_q},&n\mid r. \end{cases} \tag{3.6}

For completeness, the norm filtration is

\Nrd(1+\mathfrak P^r)=1+\mathfrak p^{\lceil r/n\rceil}.

The inclusion follows from the valuations of the characteristic coefficients; the reverse inclusion follows already from norms of principal units in the unramified maximal subfield. If n\nmid r, the norm images for r and r+1 agree, so any leading coefficient can be corrected at the next level to have norm one. If n\mid r, the first norm coefficient is the residue trace, and the next-level norm image gives exactly the trace-zero restriction in Equation (3.6). The finite-field trace is onto also when the residue characteristic divides n.

For n\nmid r, commute an element at level r with a Teichmüller element of T_v not fixed by \sigma^r. Such an element exists: T_v is cyclic of order (q^n-1)/(q-1) and is not contained in the multiplicative group of a proper subfield. On the leading coefficient this commutator is multiplication by a nonzero residue scalar. Thus commutators fill S_r/S_{r+1} in this case.

For n\mid r, use brackets between levels 1 and r-1. Both levels have unrestricted leading coefficients because n\geq3. Taking the coefficient 1 in degree 1 makes the bracket coefficients contain

(\sigma-1)\bbF_{q^n}=\ker\Tr_{\bbF_{q^n}/\bbF_q}.

Hence commutators again fill the quotient. Successive approximation now puts all of S_1 in \overline{[S_v,S_v]}. The reverse inclusion holds because the residue quotient T_v is abelian. This proves the first assertion.

Finally, commutators of \Pi with unramified units have residues \sigma(z)/z, which fill T_v by finite-field Hilbert 90. Together with the already obtained subgroup S_1, they generate a dense subgroup of S_v. Every commutator in \mathcal D^\times has reduced norm one, proving the second assertion. A local unit acts trivially on the commutative residue field, while \Pi acts by \sigma. Writing an arbitrary element as a unit times \Pi^r gives the last statement.

Here is the precise metaplectic consequence we use. Let I=\bbR/\bbZ, written additively. If G is a simply connected absolutely almost simple group over a number field, not of type A_1, and A' is a finite set of nonarchimedean places where G is anisotropic, then the restriction map

H^2_{\mathrm m}\!\left(\prod_{v\in A'}G(k_v),I\right) \longrightarrow H^2\bigl(G(k),I\bigr) \quad\text{is injective}. \tag{3.7}

This is the specialization V_2=\varnothing of [26, Proposition 2.6, p. 114]. If A' is nonempty, the local classification forces the absolute type to be A, so the type-D exclusion inherited from Proposition 2.4 there is harmless. If A' is empty, the source is H^2_{\mathrm m}(1,I)=0. The source uses measurable cohomology for locally compact groups and abstract cohomology on the rational group. In degree two these classify, respectively, topological central circle extensions with Borel sections and abstract central extensions; see [27, Section 3.2]. Thus a topological central circle extension of the displayed finite local product that splits over the abstract rational group has a continuous homomorphic section. Indeed, the zero measurable class gives a Borel homomorphic section, and Borel homomorphisms between these locally compact second-countable groups are continuous.

We apply only Equation (3.7) with G=S and A'=A. Here n\geq3 excludes type A_1, and every support place is nonarchimedean and anisotropic. In particular, this invocation involves neither a comparison with real-place metaplectic kernels nor an identification of a congruence kernel requiring the normal-subgroup assertion we are proving.

3.4 A circle extension of the full local determinant group

Give A_0 the discrete topology and define

Q=\{(y,a)\in U_A\times A_0:\det y=a_A\}, \qquad U_A=\prod_{v\in A}U(k_v). \tag{3.8}

Its determinant kernel is S_A. The group Q is locally compact and second countable: each of its countably many determinant fibers is a translate of the compact group S_A. There is a natural homomorphism

\rho:U(k)\longrightarrow Q,\qquad u\longmapsto(u_A,\det u).

The subgroup P_0\subset S_A is open and normal in Q. Normality follows first under the dense group \rho(U(k)) and then under Q. In fact \rho(U(k)) is dense in every determinant fiber by weak approximation for S. The same argument, applied modulo the open subgroup P_0, gives an isomorphism of discrete groups

Q/P_0\simeq U(k)/V_0. \tag{3.9}

The central quotient in Equation (3.5) provides the discrete central extension

1\longrightarrow B\longrightarrow U(k)/R' \longrightarrow U(k)/V_0\longrightarrow1.

Pull it back along Equation (3.9) and push it out by an injective character \iota:B\hookrightarrow I. We obtain a locally compact second-countable central extension

1\longrightarrow I\longrightarrow\widetilde Q \xrightarrow{p}Q\longrightarrow1. \tag{3.10}

The pullback description gives continuous local sections, and it also gives a specified abstract lift

\ell:U(k)\longrightarrow\widetilde Q, \qquad p\circ\ell=\rho.

Over P_0 there is a canonical continuous homomorphic section c:P_0\to\widetilde Q, obtained by taking the identity element in the discrete quotient U(k)/R'. For u\in V_0, these descriptions give

\ell(u)=c(u_A)\,\iota(uR'), \tag{3.11}

where the last factor denotes the central element of \widetilde Q corresponding to \iota(uR')\in I.

Lemma 3.4. If two elements of Q commute, any lifts of them to \widetilde Q commute.

Proof. The two determinant coordinates are elements a,b\in A_0. By Proposition 3.2(i), their local components are limits of commuting rational pairs with these exact determinants. The specified lifts under \ell of each rational pair commute. For a commuting pair in the base of a central extension, the commutator of lifts is independent of the choices of lifts. Use the continuous local sections of Equation (3.10) to pass these commutators to the limit. Their limit is 1, as required.

Restriction of Equation (3.10) to S_A splits abstractly over S(k) by \ell. Equation (3.7) therefore gives a continuous homomorphic section

j:S_A\longrightarrow\widetilde Q.

Our remaining task is to modify j so that this splitting extends from S_A to all of Q. We first make j(S_A) normal and then eliminate the commutator pairing on the determinant quotient A_0.

3.5 Making the splitting equivariant

For q\in Q, choose a lift \widetilde q and define the discrepancy character d_q:S_A\to I by

\widetilde q\,j(s)\,\widetilde q^{-1} =j(qsq^{-1})\,d_q(s). \tag{3.12}

We again regard values in I as central factors. This is a continuous character of s, independent of the lift of q. It is zero for q\in S_A, since there a lift differs from j(q) by a central element. Composition of conjugations shows that the d_q form a cocycle for the conjugation action. More explicitly,

d_{q_1q_2}(s)=d_{q_1}(q_2sq_2^{-1})+d_{q_2}(s).

The cocycle and its action factor through Q/S_A=A_0.

By Lemma 3.3, its coefficient group is the finite group

\Hom_{\mathrm{cont}}(S_A,I) =\prod_{v\in A}\Hom(T_v,I).

On the v-component the action of a\in A_0 is the power of \sigma_v specified by \ord_v(a_v). The corresponding component of the discrepancy is zero whenever \ord_v(a_v)=0. Indeed, choose a representative of a in Q whose v-component is an unramified unit of reduced norm a_v. Such a unit exists by surjectivity of unramified norms on units. It commutes with every Teichmüller lift of T_v, viewed as an element of S_A supported at v. Lemma 3.4 then makes Equation (3.12) zero on these lifts, which determine the character.

It follows that both this component of the cocycle and its action factor through the single valuation map A_0\to\bbZ. This map is onto: weak approximation in U(k) allows its v-component to be close to a local element of reduced-norm valuation one. Let d_v be the discrepancy for such a generator. It vanishes on T_v^{\sigma_v}. Indeed, the Teichmüller lifts of these fixed residue elements are central in \mathcal D_v^\times, so the same commuting-lifts test applies for any representative of the generator.

For a finite abelian group T with automorphism \sigma, the image of

\sigma^*-1:\Hom(T,I)\longrightarrow\Hom(T,I)

is exactly the characters annihilating T^\sigma. This follows by duality from the exact sequence for \sigma-1 on T, or directly by extending a character from its image to I. Consequently d_v is a coboundary. Choose a correcting character in each component and replace j(s) by j(s)\lambda(s) for the resulting continuous character \lambda:S_A\to I. Equation (3.12) then has zero discrepancy for every q. Thus we may, and do, assume that

\widetilde q\,j(s)\,\widetilde q^{-1}=j(qsq^{-1}) \quad(q\in Q,\ s\in S_A), \tag{3.13}

so that j(S_A) is normal in \widetilde Q.

3.6 Removing the determinant commutator pairing

The quotient by this normal subgroup is a central extension

1\longrightarrow I\longrightarrow\widetilde Q/j(S_A) \longrightarrow A_0\longrightarrow1. \tag{3.14}

Since A_0 is abelian, commutators in this extension give an alternating biadditive pairing, written multiplicatively in its arguments,

\omega:A_0\times A_0\longrightarrow I.

By Lemma 3.4, \omega(a,b)=0 whenever, at every v\in A, the two determinants a_v,b_v are norms of elements of one common commutative subfield of \mathcal D_v.

In particular, if every a_v is an nth power, represent it by a central scalar at each place; it commutes with any representative of b_v. Thus \omega factors through the finite group

K_A=\prod_{v\in A}k_v^\times/(k_v^\times)^n. \tag{3.15}

The map A_0\to K_A is onto. Local reduced norms are surjective, and weak approximation in U(k) realizes any prescribed classes because the local power subgroups are open. Mixed terms between two distinct factors of Equation (3.15) vanish: use central representatives for each locally trivial power class. We may therefore treat the pairing one place at a time.

Fix v, suppress it from the notation, and let \pi be a uniformizer. Unit-unit terms vanish because units are norms from the unramified maximal subfield. Alternation kills uniformizer-uniformizer terms, so the local pairing is specified by the character

u\longmapsto\omega_v(\pi,u),\qquad u\in\mathcal O_v^\times.

This character vanishes on 1+\mathfrak p_v. To prove it first take c\in k_v of valuation one. The Eisenstein extension defined by \theta^n=c has degree n, is totally ramified, and embeds in \mathcal D_v by the local invariant criterion. Since n is odd,

N(\theta)=c,\qquad N(1+\theta)=1+c.

The common-subfield test gives \omega_v(c,1+c)=0; writing c as a uniformizer times a unit and using unit-unit vanishing gives \omega_v(\pi,1+c)=0. If \ord_v(d)\geq2, choose any such c and write

1+d=\frac{(1+c)(1+d)}{1+c}.

Both numerator and denominator have the form 1+c' with \ord_v(c')=1. This proves vanishing on all principal units. The remaining parameter is therefore a character of \bbF_q^\times killed by n.

We still have freedom to change j by characters of S_A invariant under Q. At the fixed place these are the \sigma-invariant characters of T_v. Such a change preserves Equation (3.13). Its effect on the pairing is evaluation, up to the fixed sign convention for commutators, on the residue of the ordinary local commutator of determinant representatives. For a prime element \Pi and an unramified unit with residue r, that residue is

\frac{\sigma(r)}{r}.

The residue norm of r is the residue of the unit determinant u. Replacing r by another norm preimage changes this expression by an element of (\sigma-1)T_v. Hence we have a well-defined map

\bbF_q^\times\longrightarrow T_v/(\sigma-1)T_v, \qquad N(r)\longmapsto\sigma(r)/r. \tag{3.16}

This map is onto. To see this explicitly, put

M=\frac{q^n-1}{q-1},\qquad d=\gcd(q-1,n),

and choose a generator g of \bbF_{q^n}^\times. The group T_v is generated by g^{q-1}. Since (h,n)=1,

|T_v/(\sigma-1)T_v| =\gcd(M,q^h-1)=\gcd(M,q-1)=d.

The image of the generator g^M of \bbF_q^\times in Equation (3.16) is represented, in the generator g^{q-1}, by the exponent

\frac{q^h-1}{q-1}\equiv h\pmod d.

It is a generator because (h,d)=1. Dualizing this surjection shows that invariant characters of T_v produce exactly all residue unit characters killed by n. They can therefore cancel the remaining parameter u\mapsto\omega_v(\pi,u). A unit adjustment between \Nrd(\Pi) and the chosen \pi makes no difference, since unit-unit terms already vanish.

Perform this adjustment at every place of A. The new section still has normal image, and the commuting-lifts test still holds; in particular, all the preceding reductions of the pairing remain valid. Its only possible parameters have now been cancelled, so \omega=0. The extension in Equation (3.14) is therefore abelian. The circle group is divisible and hence injective as an abelian group, so this extension splits. A homomorphism from the discrete group A_0 is automatically continuous.

Let C_0 be the inverse image in \widetilde Q of the image of such a section of Equation (3.14). Then C_0\cap I=1 and p(C_0)=Q: for any lift of an element of Q, its central coordinate in the quotient can be removed using I. Consequently p:C_0\to Q is a group isomorphism. Locally on each determinant fiber its inverse is a translate of j, so the inverse is continuous. We have proved that Equation (3.10) has a continuous homomorphic section

s:Q\longrightarrow\widetilde Q. \tag{3.17}

3.7 Extracting a nonzero finite character

Compare the continuous section in Equation (3.17) with the specified abstract lift of rational points. Their difference is a character

\chi_0:U(k)\longrightarrow I, \qquad \ell(u)=s(\rho(u))\,\chi_0(u). \tag{3.18}

It has finite image on S(k). Indeed, for u\in R' the canonical formula in Equation (3.11) reads \ell(u)=c(u_A). The difference of c and s|_{P_0} is a continuous character of the profinite group P_0. Its image in the circle is finite: a quotient of a profinite group is profinite, whereas a closed subgroup of the circle is either finite or the whole circle. Thus \chi_0(R') is finite. Since R' has finite index in S(k), the image \chi_0(S(k)) is a finite union of cosets of that finite subgroup and is finite.

It is also nonzero. Choose \beta\ne1 in B and u\in V_0 representing it. Because R is dense in P_0 and u_A\in P_0, there is a sequence r_j\in R such that

(ur_j)_A\longrightarrow1.

All ur_j still represent \beta modulo R'. If \chi_0 vanished on S(k), Equations (3.11) and (3.18) would give

c((ur_j)_A)\,\iota(\beta)=s(\rho(ur_j)).

Both continuous sections tend to the identity, which would imply \iota(\beta)=0, contrary to injectivity of \iota.

Finally we make the character finite on all of U(k) without changing its restriction to S(k). The multiplicative group of a number field is free abelian modulo its finite roots of unity: use the ideal map and the finite generation of the unit group. Therefore its subgroup A_0 has the form

A_0=T\oplus\bigoplus_{j\in J}\bbZ a_j,

where T is finite and J may be infinite. Choose u_j\in U(k) with \det u_j=a_j, and choose a character \psi:A_0\to I satisfying \psi(a_j)=\chi_0(u_j) and \psi|_T=0. Then

\chi=\chi_0-\psi\circ\det

vanishes on all the chosen u_j and equals \chi_0 on S(k). If m kills the finite group \chi_0(S(k)) and t kills T, then mt kills \chi(U(k)): remove the free determinant part using the u_j, and the tth power of the remaining element lies in S(k). The subgroup of the circle killed by mt is finite. Thus \chi is a finite character and remains nonzero on S(k).

When A=\varnothing, the same construction has Q=A_0 and trivial S_A. Commuting approximation makes the circle extension abelian immediately, and all subsequent arguments apply unchanged. We have proved alternative (i) in the remaining case, completing the proof of Proposition 3.1.

The finite defect can therefore be nontrivial only if the full unitary group admits one of the two homomorphisms in that proposition. The character argument in Section 4 and the color argument in Sections 5–6 exclude these alternatives, retaining the division and odd-degree hypotheses fixed here.

4 Excluding finite abelian characters

Throughout this section, L/k is quadratic, D is a central division algebra over L of odd degree n\geq3, and * is a unitary involution. We retain U=\U(D,*) and S=\SU(D,*) from Section 3. Our aim is the following assertion, which eliminates the abelian alternative of Proposition 3.1.

Theorem 4.1. Every homomorphism from U(k) to a finite abelian group is trivial on S(k).

Fix such a homomorphism \chi:U(k)\to B, and write B additively. The proof first converts \chi into a difference function on D. Exact elementary transformations make this difference independent of its arguments. A real-signature argument then converts that algebraic identity into continuity on S(k), after which local commutators finish the proof. No continuity of \chi is assumed.

4.1 A noncommutative difference identity

Let \mathcal D be the set of nonzero b\in D for which b+b^*=a^*a for some a\in D. Define

m_b=1-ab^{-1}a^*,\qquad f(b)=\chi(m_b). \tag{4.1}

These definitions also allow a=0, in which case b is skew and m_b=1. Multiplication using a^*a=b+b^* gives m_bm_b^*=1. If a'{}^*a'=a^*a\ne0, then a'=va with v\in U(k), and the two resulting elements m_b are conjugate by v. Thus f is well-defined. Moreover,

f(x^*bx)=f(b)\qquad(x\in D^\times), \tag{4.2}

because ax can be used in the definition on the left.

For the moment fix d\in D^\times such that the reduced spectra of d and d^* are disjoint. For (a,c)\in D^2\setminus\{(0,0)\}, there is a unique e\in D satisfying

e+e^*=c^*c,\qquad ed+d^*e^*=a^*a. \tag{4.3}

Indeed the equation

ed-d^*e=a^*a-d^*c^*c

has a unique solution: after splitting the algebra its linear part is the Sylvester operator, whose eigenvalues are the differences of the two disjoint spectra. Taking adjoints shows that c^*c-e^* is another solution of this same equation, giving the first identity in Equation 4.3 and then the second. The solution is nonzero, for e=0 would imply a=c=0. Consequently

F_d(a,c)=f(ed)-f(e)

is defined on all nonzero pairs.

Lemma 4.2. The function F_d is invariant under independent left multiplications of its two arguments by elements of U(k), and under

(a,c)\longmapsto(a-cd,a-c). \tag{4.4}

Proof. The independent unitary multiplications leave Equation 4.3 unchanged. For the second assertion put b=ed and z=b^*+e-a^*c. Expansion, with the order of all factors unchanged, gives

z+z^*=(a-c)^*(a-c),\qquad zd+d^*z^*=(a-cd)^*(a-cd).

The transformation in Equation 4.4 is invertible: its kernel would give a=c and c(1-d)=0, whereas d\ne1 by spectral disjointness. In particular z\ne0.

Set A'=ce^{-1}-ab^{-1} and q=b^{-*}ze^{-1}, where b^{-*}=(b^*)^{-1}. A direct expansion gives A'{}^*A'=q+q^*. Also

q=(b^{-1})^*(zd)b^{-1},

so Equation 4.2 identifies f(q) with f(zd). For clarity, the multiplicative identity needed here is

1-(A'e)z^{-1}(b^*A'{}^*)=m_bm_zm_e^*, \tag{4.5}

where the defining vectors for m_b,m_z,m_e are respectively a,c-a,c. It follows from the two identities

\begin{align*} A'e&=-ab^{-1}z+m_b(c-a),\\ b^*A'{}^*&=ze^{-*}c^*+(c-a)^*m_e^*.\end{align*}

To check the remaining terms after multiplying these identities, use m_ba=-ab^{-1}b^* and c^*c=e+e^*. The part of the left side of Equation 4.5 not containing -(m_b(c-a))z^{-1}((c-a)^*m_e^*) is then m_bm_e^*. The left side of Equation 4.5 is precisely the unitary element defining f(q), because q^{-1}=ez^{-1}b^*. Applying \chi proves

f(zd)=f(b)+f(z)-f(e),

which is the required invariance. These computations take place in D; no commutativity of their entries is used.

4.2 Producing exact elementary transformations

Suppose now that d lies in a *-stable maximal subfield E\subset D which is Galois over L. Write \bar z=z^* for z\in E, and suppose that the n conjugates t_1,\ldots,t_n of d are distinct and disjoint from \bar t_1,\ldots,\bar t_n. Skolem–Noether gives a decomposition

D=\bigoplus_{j=1}^n E w_j,\qquad w_jd=t_jw_j.

Let E^1=\{z\in E^\times:z\bar z=1\}. The pair move in Equation 4.4 and independent left multiplications by elements of E^1 preserve the n two-dimensional E-blocks in D\oplus D.

In the invariance group take the subgroup H generated by diagonal E^1-multiplications on either coordinate and by the simultaneous matrices

B_h(t_j)=\begin{pmatrix}1&t_j\bar h\\h&1\end{pmatrix} \qquad(h\in E^1). \tag{4.6}

Indeed changing the sign of the second output in Equation 4.4 gives B_{-1}, and conjugating by diagonal phases gives all B_h. Each determinant is 1-t_j\ne0.

Lemma 4.3. For each block i, H contains a nonidentity upper elementary unipotent supported only on block i, and a nonidentity lower elementary unipotent supported only on block i.

Proof. We first separate one block from the others. On a block with parameter t, the product B_h(t)B_{hz}(t) sends the first coordinate axis to the line of slope

h\frac{1+z}{1+tz}\qquad(z,h\in E^1).

At t=t_j the norm of the slope with h=1 is

\ell_j(z)=\frac{(1+z)^2}{(1+t_jz)(z+\bar t_j)}. \tag{4.7}

This is a degree-two rational function. Apart from finitely many z, the other solution z' of \ell_j(z')=\ell_j(z) is distinct from z and lies in E. Explicitly, with a=t_j and b=\bar t_j,

z'=\frac{(a-b)z+1+ab-2b}{(1+ab-2a)z+b-a}.

It belongs to E^1: conjugate reciprocation preserves the two roots and fixes the first, so fixes the second. If s_t(z)=(1+z)/(1+tz), choose h'=s_{t_j}(z)/s_{t_j}(z')\in E^1. Then

g_j(t)=\bigl(B_{h'}(t)B_{h'z'}(t)\bigr)^{-1}B_1(t)B_z(t)

has lower-left entry zero at t_j.

The lower-left numerator of g_j(t) is

(1+tz')(1+z)-h'(1+z')(1+tz).

This is a nonzero linear polynomial in t: the corresponding two fractional slope functions have distinct poles and nonzero numerators. Its unique root is t_j. Thus the lower-left entry of g_j(t) is nonzero at every other t_\ell and at every \bar t_\ell. Matrices of the form

\begin{pmatrix}\alpha(t)&t\overline{\beta}(t)\\ \beta(t)&\overline{\alpha}(t)\end{pmatrix},

where the bar acts on coefficients and fixes the indeterminate t, are closed under multiplication and inversion. The boosts have this form. Consequently the upper-right entry of g_j(t) vanishes exactly when its lower-left entry vanishes at \bar t. It is therefore nonzero at all t_\ell, including t_j.

We may also arrange that all diagonal entries at every t_\ell are nonzero. Here is a check that the excluded conditions are proper. At z=-1, Equation 4.7 has a double zero and its degree-two interchange sends z to z' with derivative -1. Thus h'\to-1 as z\to-1, and both boost products tend to (1-t)I. Hence g_j(t)\to I. These are algebraic limits on the norm-one parameter curve over the fixed field of bar; its rational points E^1 are infinite, by Hilbert 90, so avoid the finitely many proper exceptional conditions. We have obtained a triangular, nondiagonal matrix at j, and matrices with all four entries nonzero at the other blocks. Repeating the construction with \bar t_j in place of t_j gives a lower triangular, nondiagonal matrix at j.

Fix a block i. For each j\ne i, let H^{(j)} be the subgroup generated by g_j and the diagonal phases. Its projection at j is upper triangular. Its projection at i is projectively Zariski dense in \PGL_2 over an algebraic closure of E: it contains a Zariski-dense subgroup of the diagonal torus and a matrix with all entries nonzero. A proper algebraic subgroup containing the diagonal torus lies in a Borel subgroup or its torus normalizer, neither of which contains that matrix. Since the second derived group of a triangular group is trivial, (H^{(j)})'' acts trivially at j, but remains projectively Zariski dense at i. The latter assertion follows by taking the Zariski closures of commutators in the perfect algebraic group \PGL_2.

Importantly, use the full kernels

K_j=\ker\bigl(H\longrightarrow\GL_2(E) \text{ on block }j\bigr).

Each K_j is normal in H and contains (H^{(j)})'', so its image at i is projectively dense. A commutator of two such kernels is trivial on the union of their excluded blocks and remains projectively dense at i: the commutators of two dense images are dense in the derived algebraic group \PGL_2. Iterating gives a projectively dense image at i of

K_{\ne i}=\bigcap_{j\ne i}K_j.

Write H_i for the projection of H at i, and P_i for the image of K_{\ne i} there. We have proved that P_i\triangleleft H_i and that P_i is projectively Zariski dense.

We next pass from this density to actual unipotents. Commuting the upper and lower triangular, nondiagonal elements already constructed with diagonal phases shows that H_i contains upper and lower elementary unipotents with some nonzero coefficients. Phase conjugation and addition show that their coefficients contain scalar multiples of the additive group \mathbb Z E^1. Its rational span is all of E. Indeed that span is a finite-dimensional subring of a field, hence a field; the Cayley ratios (1+x)/(1-x) for \bar x=-x show that it contains the whole skew subspace, which generates E. It follows that the allowable coefficients for both upper and lower unipotents contain a common nonzero integral ideal I\subset\mathcal O_E.

Choose p\in P_i with p\infty=r\ne\infty on \mathbb P^1(E). Choose an infinite-order unit u\in\mathcal O_E^\times sufficiently close to 1 modulo an integral ideal that

u=1+st\quad(s,t\in I),\qquad (1-u^2)r\in I.

Such units exist by the unit theorem: [E:\mathbb Q]\ge6, and a congruence subgroup of the unit group has finite index. More explicitly, fix 0\ne s\in I, require u-1\in sI, and impose the additional congruence clearing the denominator of r. With U(x)=\left(\begin{smallmatrix}1&x\\0&1\end{smallmatrix}\right) and L(x)=\left(\begin{smallmatrix}1&0\\x&1\end{smallmatrix}\right), the exact identity

U(s)L(t)U(-s/u)L(-tu)=\diag(u,u^{-1})

shows that H_i contains the affine transformation

h:x\longmapsto u^2x+(1-u^2)r.

It fixes r and \infty. Normality gives q=h^{-1}p^{-1}hp\in P_i. This element fixes \infty and has affine slope u^{-4}: in a local coordinate at \infty the derivative of h is u^{-2}, whereas at r it is u^2. Thus, for any nonzero x\in I,

qU(x)q^{-1}U(-x)=U((u^{-4}-1)x)

is an actual nonidentity upper unipotent in P_i. Scalar factors in a representative of q cancel in this identity. By the definition of P_i it lifts to an element of H which is the identity on every other block. Interchanging the axes proves the lower assertion.

To turn a single nonzero shear coefficient into an arbitrary additive change in D, we need the following exact statement, not merely local density.

Lemma 4.4. The additive subgroup generated by U(k) is all of D:

\mathbb Z U(k)=D.

Proof. Let M=\mathbb Z U(k). It is a subring, since U(k) is a group. For a rational prime p, let C_p be its additive closure in D_p=D\otimes_{\mathbb Q}\mathbb Q_p. Weak approximation for U puts the product of its local groups above p inside C_p. The largest \mathbb Q_p-vector subspace of C_p is

V_p=\bigcap_{j\ge0}p^jC_p.

It is closed; here closed additivity implies stability under \mathbb Z_p. Left and right multiplication by every local unitary element preserve V_p. Differentiating these actions shows stability under multiplication by every skew element, separately in each local component. The skew elements generate the local algebra: an invertible central skew scalar and its inverse, together with skew multiples of Hermitian elements, generate all Hermitian and skew elements. Hence V_p is a two-sided ideal of D_p.

Every simple factor occurs in this ideal. At a nonsplit finite place of k, the algebra over L splits and the unitary group is isotropic because n\ge3. Choose an unbounded sequence in that local unitary group, taking the identity in the other local components. Multiplication by suitable positive powers p^{r_\nu}, with r_\nu\to\infty, gives a subsequence tending to a nonzero vector in this factor and zero in the others. For each fixed j, the same sequence multiplied by p^{r_\nu-j} lies in C_p eventually, so its limit is divisible by p^j in C_p. The nonzero limit belongs to V_p. At a split place the two factors are interchanged by *; the unitary group contains reciprocal central scalars. Taking (p^{-r},p^r) and scaling by p^r gives a nonzero limit in one factor alone; reversing the two scalars gives the other. Thus the ideal V_p contains every simple factor, proving C_p=D_p.

This local density implies that the rational span of M is D, so M contains a full \mathbb Z-lattice \Lambda in D. Fix x=p^{-j}\lambda, with \lambda\in\Lambda. Choose a\in M with a-x\in\Lambda\otimes\mathbb Z_p. There is a positive integer m prime to p, congruent to 1 modulo p^j, which clears all denominators of a away from p relative to \Lambda. Then ma-mx\in\Lambda at every rational prime, and hence globally, while (m-1)x\in\Lambda. Therefore x\in M. Inverting all rational primes in \Lambda now gives M=D.

Proposition 4.5. Let E\subset D be a *-stable maximal subfield, Galois over L. Let d\in E^\times have n distinct L-conjugates t_1,\ldots,t_n whose set is disjoint from \{\bar t_1,\ldots,\bar t_n\}, where \bar z=z^* on E. Then, whenever b,bd\in\mathcal D,

f(bd)-f(b)=\chi(\bar d/d). \tag{4.8}

Proof. We show that the invariance group of F_d is transitive on nonzero pairs. If c\ne0, one of its E-block coordinates is nonzero. The corresponding pure upper shear of Lemma 4.3 changes a by a fixed nonzero element y\in D, leaving c unchanged. Conjugating this transformation by left multiplication of the first coordinate by v\in U(k) changes a by vy. Products and inverses therefore permit addition of every element of (\mathbb ZU(k))y=D, by Lemma 4.4 and division. The lower shears likewise permit arbitrary changes of c when a\ne0. These operations connect every nonzero pair to a pair with both entries nonzero, and then connect any two such pairs. Thus F_d is constant.

At e=(d-\bar d)^{-1}, Equation 4.3 is solved by c=0, a=1. The unitary elements defining f(e) and f(ed) are respectively 1 and \bar d/d. This evaluates the constant and proves Equation 4.8.

4.3 Scalar normalization and a cyclic maximal field

Let \Omega be the nonsplit real places of k. At v\in\Omega write the involution as x^*=H_v^{-1}\bar x^{\,t}H_v on M_n(\mathbb C). For a nonzero Hermitian element h\in D, call its signature admissible when the signature of H_vh is that of H_v up to overall sign, for every v\in\Omega. This does not depend on the matrix realization. Define \mathcal D^\# to consist of the nonzero skew elements and the b\in D for which h=b+b^*\ne0 has admissible signature. Division makes every such h invertible.

Lemma 4.6. If h=h^*\ne0 has admissible signature and s=\Nrd(h)\in k^\times, there is a\in D^\times with

a^*a=sh,\qquad \Nrd(a)=s^{(n+1)/2}. \tag{4.9}

Consequently

f^\#(b)=f(sb)\qquad(b\in\mathcal D^\#)

is well-defined using any s\in k^\times for which sb\in\mathcal D. It is invariant under congruence by D^\times and multiplication by k^\times.

Proof. At a nonsplit finite place the algebra splits; classification of Hermitian forms says that its dimension and determinant modulo norms determine its isometry class. The determinant ratio for sh is s^{n+1}, which is a norm since n+1 is even. At a nonsplit real place, \operatorname{sign}(s) is positive if H_vh has the signature of H_v, and negative if it has the opposite signature, because n is odd. Thus sH_vh has precisely the signature of H_v. At split finite places the assertion reduces to surjectivity of the local reduced norm; at split archimedean places the algebra is split, again by odd degree. These facts give local solutions of a^*a=sh. Their reduced norms can be made exactly s^{(n+1)/2}, since the determinant map of the local full unitary group is onto its norm-one group. The variety in Equation 4.9 is a torsor under the simply connected group S, and so has a rational point by its Hasse principle. We use here the local Hermitian classification and the simply connected Hasse principle in their number-field forms [16, 25].

If both sb and tb are in \mathcal D and b is not skew, taking reduced norms of the two defining Hermitian equations shows that (t/s)^n is a norm from L^\times. The quotient k^\times/N_{L/k}(L^\times) has exponent two. Since n is odd, t/s itself is a norm, say t/s=\bar z z. Central congruence by z and Equation 4.2 give f(tb)=f(sb). For skew b both values are zero. This proves independence. Congruence and scalar invariance follow by applying the same argument to any permissible normalization.

Lemma 4.7. There is a *-stable maximal subfield E\subset D which is cyclic of degree n over L. Its norm-one torus T=\ker(N_{E/L}:\Res_{E/L}\mathbb G_m\to\mathbb G_m) has weak approximation over L.

Proof. By the odd-degree case of Grunwald–Wang, choose a cyclic extension F/k of degree n having full local degree at each place below the Brauer support of D [23]; see also [22, Chapter VIII, Theorem 2.4 and Corollary 2.5]. It is disjoint from L. The local invariant criterion shows that E_0=LF splits D; since [E_0:L]=n, the embedding criterion for central simple algebras gives an embedding \alpha:E_0\hookrightarrow D [33]. Let bar on E_0 fix F and restrict to the nonidentity automorphism of L/k. Skolem–Noether supplies h\in D^\times with

\alpha(\bar z)^*=h\alpha(z)h^{-1}\qquad(z\in E_0).

Replacing z by \bar z and taking adjoints gives

\alpha(z)=h^{-*}\alpha(\bar z)^*h^*.

Thus h^* also intertwines the two embeddings, and c=h^{-1}h^* lies in \alpha(E_0). On this field the adjoint satisfies x^*=h\bar xh^{-1}, so

\bar c=h^{-1}c^*h=h^{-*}h=c^{-1}.

Hilbert 90 gives t/\bar t=c. The replacement h\mapsto h\alpha(t) preserves the intertwining identity and is Hermitian, because (h\alpha(t))^*=h\alpha(\bar t)c=h\alpha(t).

At a real place in \Omega, the odd cyclic extension F/k splits completely. For the Hermitian form with matrix H_vh, the n eigenlines of \alpha(E_0) are orthogonal. Replacing h by h\alpha(z), with z\in F^\times, scales their Hermitian coefficients independently by the real embeddings of z. Weak approximation in F therefore makes its signature admissible at every such place, even equal to that of H_v if desired. Apply Lemma 4.6 to obtain a^*a=sh. The embedding z\mapsto a\alpha(z)a^{-1} is *-stable and induces bar, since

(a\alpha(\bar z)a^{-1})^* =(a^*)^{-1}h\alpha(z)h^{-1}a^* =a\alpha(z)a^{-1}.

Its image is the required E. Finally, for a cyclic generator \sigma of \Gal(E/L), Hilbert 90 parametrizes T(L) by y/\sigma(y) with y\in E^\times. The same parametrization holds at each completion, and weak approximation in E proves weak approximation for T.

Fix this field E and an integer m\ge1 annihilating B. Call d\in T(L)^m admissible if its conjugates over L are distinct and disjoint from their bars. These conditions specify a nonempty k-Zariski open subset of \Res_{L/k}T: after extending scalars, the two determinant-one eigenvalue lists can be chosen independently, avoiding equality within or between the lists. In particular admissible elements exist, since the rational points of T are Zariski dense and the power map is dominant. Let \mathcal C be their D^\times-conjugates. This set is closed under inversion.

Corollary 4.8. If t\in\mathcal C and b,bt\in\mathcal D^\#, then

f^\#(bt)=f^\#(b). \tag{4.10}

Proof. Write t=xdx^{-1}. Congruence by x gives x^*(bt)x=(x^*bx)d. Choose separate scalar normalizations of these two arguments. Their ratio only replaces d in Proposition 4.5 by a nonzero k-multiple, which preserves spectral disjointness and leaves \bar d/d unchanged. If d=y^m with y\in T(L), then \bar d/d=(\bar y/y)^m, an m-th power in E^1\subset U(k). Thus its character is zero, and Equation 4.10 follows.

4.4 Keeping products in the real signature domain

The subgroup J\subset\SL_1(D)(L) generated by \mathcal C is noncentral and normal. The established inner-type case of the Margulis–Platonov theorem, applied over the number field L, gives an open neighborhood W of 1 in

\prod_{w\in A_D}\SL_1(D)(L_w)

whose rational inverse image is contained in J. Here A_D is the set of finite places of L where D\otimes_LL_w is division. This use of the known inner case is independent of the outer case being proved [36, Theorem 2][27, Sections 3.4–3.5]. Although every element of J is a word in the allowed steps, an arbitrary word need not preserve the real signature domain at its intermediate products. The next lemma supplies the required control.

Lemma 4.9. Let b\in\mathcal D^\# have nonzero Hermitian part. For every r\in\SL_1(D)(L) with r_{A_D}\in W and r_\Omega sufficiently close to 1, one has

f^\#(br)=f^\#(b). \tag{4.11}

Proof. If \Omega is empty, the signature condition is absent: every nonzero element of D is in \mathcal D^\#, either with nonzero Hermitian part or skew. A word in \mathcal C therefore proves the assertion directly by Corollary 4.8.

Suppose \Omega\ne\varnothing and write G_\Omega=\prod_{v\in\Omega}\SL_n(\mathbb C). Let \mathcal O be the open set of g\in G_\Omega for which bg has nondegenerate Hermitian part with the required signatures. It contains 1. Restrict r_\Omega to a sufficiently small neighborhood of 1 that it can be joined to 1 by a path \gamma:[0,1]\to\mathcal O. Since r\in J, write it as a word in elements of \mathcal C. Join each factor of this word to 1 in the corresponding conjugate of T at \Omega; these complex tori are connected. The product of the factor paths is a path p from 1 to r_\Omega.

We explain why the based loop p^{-1}\gamma is a finite product of based loops in rational conjugates of T. The Lie algebras of finitely many such conjugates span the real Lie algebra of G_\Omega. Indeed the full conjugacy span is the whole Lie algebra by simplicity, and rational conjugators in D^\times are dense independently at the finitely many places. The multiplication map from finitely many of these tori consequently has a continuous local section near 1, taking 1 to the tuple of identities. Applying this section pointwise factors every based loop sufficiently uniformly close to 1 into based torus loops. The subgroup they generate in the based loop group is therefore open. The based loop group is connected, because every \SL_n(\mathbb C) is simply connected; hence that open subgroup is the whole based loop group. This proves the desired finite factorization of p^{-1}\gamma.

Appending these factors to those of p writes \gamma pointwise as a finite product of paths in rational conjugates of T, each starting at 1 and with rational prescribed endpoint. Every endpoint belongs to the corresponding rational m-th-power group: the original word has this property, and the appended loops end at 1.

Take a fine mesh in [0,1] with at least one interior point. At its interior nodes approximate each torus factor by rational points in its m-th-power group, leaving the endpoints unchanged. These rational powers are dense at \Omega: use weak approximation for T and surjectivity of the power map on each complex torus. We can further require that every consecutive ratio in every factor is admissible, including the ratios next to the fixed endpoints. To see this precisely, regard all interior nodes as independent variables in products of \Res_{L/k}T. Every consecutive-ratio map is dominant; beside a fixed endpoint it is simply translation or inverse translation of the free variable. The complement of admissibility therefore pulls back to a proper closed subset in each case. The finite union of these subsets cannot fill the irreducible parameter variety. One may work in the parameters before taking m-th powers, whose power map is dominant: weak approximation then supplies rational parameters arbitrarily close to the chosen local roots while avoiding the finite proper closed exclusions. Thus both endpoint ratios and all interior ratios can be made admissible simultaneously.

Pass from one mesh product to the next by changing one factor at a time. Each change is right multiplication by a rational D^\times-conjugate of an admissible increment. All intermediate products remain in \mathcal O if the mesh is sufficiently fine and the approximations sufficiently close. To justify the uniform choice, the finitely many factor paths are uniformly continuous, their images are compact, and \gamma([0,1]) is a compact subset of the open set \mathcal O; mixed products from two sufficiently nearby mesh nodes are uniformly close to \gamma. At the rational intermediate points the real nondegeneracy also guarantees nonzero Hermitian part in D. Corollary 4.8 now applies to every move. The initial and final products are exactly 1 and r, so their character differences give Equation 4.11.

4.5 Continuity and the final vanishing

Proof of Theorem 4.1. Choose u\in U(k) with \Nrd(u)\ne1. Such an element can be chosen central, since the norm-one torus of L/k has infinitely many rational points. Division implies that 1-u is invertible. Put b=(1-u)^{-1}. Direct calculation gives

b+b^*=1,\qquad b^*=-ub,\qquad f^\#(b)=f(b)=\chi(u). \tag{4.12}

If u'\in U(k) has the same reduced norm as u, define b'=(1-u')^{-1}; it satisfies the same identities. In particular

q=\frac{\Nrd(b')}{\Nrd(b)}\in k^\times.

Indeed \overline{\Nrd(b)}=-\Nrd(u)\Nrd(b) by oddness, and the same identity for b' makes the ratio fixed by L/k.

Suppose u' is sufficiently close to u at A_D and at \Omega, using both places of L over every split place of k. Choose a\in D^\times with

\Nrd(a)=q^{(n-1)/2},

and with a close to 1 at all these places. The global reduced norm theorem gives one such element without the approximation conditions: the only possible archimedean sign obstruction occurs at quaternionic real factors, which cannot occur in odd degree. Locally near 1 the reduced norm is a submersion, so there are local solutions near 1 for q near 1. Weak approximation for the simply connected inner group \SL_1(D) then adjusts the global solution to these local solutions [25, 33].

Set b''=q^{-1}a^*b'a. Congruence and scalar invariance give f^\#(b'')=f^\#(b'), while

\Nrd(b'')=q^{-n}q^{n-1}\Nrd(b')=\Nrd(b).

Thus r=b^{-1}b''\in\SL_1(D)(L) is close to 1 at A_D and \Omega. Lemma 4.9 gives f^\#(b'')=f^\#(b), and hence \chi(u')=\chi(u). Taking u'=us shows that \chi|_{S(k)} is continuous for the topology induced by these finitely many local factors.

The set A_D consists precisely of the two places over each place in A from Section 3. At nonsplit places the algebra splits, and at a split place its local norm-one group is anisotropic exactly when the component algebra is division. Weak approximation for S therefore extends this finite-valued continuous restriction uniquely to a continuous homomorphism on

\prod_{v\in A}S(k_v)\ \times\ \prod_{v\in\Omega}S(k_v).

For completeness, write H for the dense rational subgroup and K for the kernel of its character. Continuity makes K closed in H, so \overline K\cap H=K. Finitely many cosets h_iK cover H; the finite closed union of h_i\overline K therefore covers the ambient local product. The subgroup \overline K consequently has finite index and is open, since its complement is a finite union of closed cosets. It is normal by density and continuity of conjugation. The resulting map H/K\to G/\overline K, where G denotes the local product, is an isomorphism: injectivity is the intersection identity, and surjectivity is the coset cover. This gives the asserted continuous extension. Each real factor is connected and so maps trivially to the finite group B.

Finally fix a split place v\in A, writing U(k_v)=\mathcal D_v^\times and S(k_v)=\SL_1(\mathcal D_v). Weak approximation in U approximates any two local elements at v by rational unitary elements, with the identity prescribed at the other places of A and \Omega. Their rational commutators belong to S(k) and have character zero. Continuity of the extended restriction therefore kills every local commutator of \mathcal D_v^\times. Lemma 3.3 says that these commutators generate a dense subgroup of \SL_1(\mathcal D_v), so this factor also maps trivially. All factors have been killed, proving \chi(S(k))=0. This includes A=\varnothing, when only the connected real factors occur, and includes the case where both products are empty.

5 Excluding nonabelian simple colors

We retain the odd-degree division-algebra hypotheses and notation of Section 3. Thus L/k is quadratic, D is a central division L-algebra of odd degree n\geq3, the involution * induces the nontrivial automorphism of L/k, and S=\SU(D,*)\subset U=\U(D,*). Fix i\in L^\times with \bar i=-i. For R=S(k)^e let P_0 and V_0 have the meaning of Proposition 2.3. We now eliminate the nonabelian alternative in Proposition 3.1.

Theorem 5.1. There is no homomorphism

\phi:U(k)\longrightarrow\mathcal F \quad\text{with}\quad R\subset\ker\phi,\qquad \phi(V_0)=\mathcal F,

where \mathcal F is a finite nonabelian simple group.

Suppose, for a contradiction, that such a homomorphism exists. We call its values colors. It is surjective, so central scalars in U(k) have color 1: their images centralize \mathcal F. The finite-group input is the following assertion. Its statement is independent of the arithmetic constructions below.

Lemma 5.2. For every finite nonabelian simple group \mathcal F there is a nonempty proper conjugacy-invariant subset \mathcal S\subset\mathcal F with the following property. If W\in\mathcal S, Z\notin\mathcal S, and WZ=ZW, then it is impossible that

ZW\in C(B)(ZW^{-1})C(BZ^2) \qquad\text{for every }B\in\mathcal F, \tag{5.1}

where C(B)=C_{\mathcal F}(B) denotes the centralizer of B in \mathcal F.

The proof of Lemma 5.2 occupies Section 6. We use exactly its displayed double-coset condition. Our task in this section is to force that condition from sufficiently many additive returns of colors, and then to show that avoiding it would make membership in \mathcal S constant on \mathcal F.

5.1 The compact space of color configurations

Let \widetilde G be the simply connected special unitary group of the hyperbolic binary hermitian form over (D,*) with coefficients 1,-1. Let X be its projective variety of isotropic right D-lines. Since D is division, the form has relative rank one, and the stabilizer of such a line is a minimal k-parabolic of \widetilde G. Every rational isotropic line has a unique representative (u,1) with u\in U(k): the second entry cannot vanish, and division makes it invertible. This identifies X(k) with U(k).

There is also an additive parametrization. Put

J=\{x\in D:x=x^*\},\qquad q(x)=(x+i)(x-i)^{-1}.

Here J is a k-vector space, and

X(k)=J(k)\sqcup\{\infty\},\qquad q(\infty)=1. \tag{5.2}

Indeed x-i is nonzero for x=x^*, and u-1 is invertible for every u\ne1 in U(k). The corresponding column on the additive chart is (x+i,x-i). At a completion k_v, these two parametrizations give open charts isomorphic to U(k_v) and J(k_v), respectively. Their complements are proper algebraic subvarieties and therefore have measure zero for any smooth measure on X(k_v). We shall use this assertion at finitely many completions at a time.

Let \mathcal H be the countable group of rational transformations of X induced by rational form similitudes. It contains \widetilde G(k), the left and right rotations

L_a(u)=au,\qquad R_a(u)=ua\quad(a\in U(k)),

and the additive translations T_b(x)=x+b for b\in J(k). Write \tau_s=T_s when s\in k\subset J(k). For p\in X(k) define a configuration

c(p)=(c_h(p))_{h\in\mathcal H},\qquad c_h(p)=\phi(u(hp))\in\mathcal F.

We call this configuration a palette, and let \mathcal C\subset\mathcal F^{\mathcal H} be the closure of the rational palettes. The product topology makes \mathcal C compact and metrizable. The action is

(h c)_j=c_{jh};\qquad c(hp)=h c(p).

Every pattern on finitely many coordinates of a palette in \mathcal C occurs at a rational point, because the colors form a finite discrete space. In particular, all finite-coordinate identities satisfied by rational palettes hold throughout \mathcal C.

5.2 A translation-invariant law with uniform marginals

The next proposition supplies additive recurrence without losing any color. Arbitrary additive averages of rational palettes need not have uniform marginals, so we first construct a measure with controlled conditional laws over the local flag varieties.

Proposition 5.3. There is a probability measure \mu on \mathcal C invariant under T_b for every b\in J(k) such that

\mu\{c:c_h=a\}=\frac1{|\mathcal F|} \qquad(h\in\mathcal H,\ a\in\mathcal F).

Proof. We construct a conformal joint law, identify its local projection, prove that its conditional color marginals are uniform, and only then average additively.

A joint law over all completions. For every place v, choose an Iwasawa maximal compact subgroup K_v\subset\widetilde G(k_v) and its invariant probability m_v on X(k_v). The compact group is transitive on this flag variety. Choose the good integral compacts at almost all finite places, and set

Y=\prod_v X(k_v),\qquad m=\prod_v m_v.

Each m_v is smooth and has full support. A fixed h\in\mathcal H has smooth positive Jacobians on all local factors and preserves m_v outside finitely many places. For the latter assertion, discard the finitely many denominators and nonunit similitude multipliers of a representative of h. At every remaining place it normalizes the good integral compact of \widetilde G; its pushforward of m_v is consequently the same compact-invariant probability. Thus

\rho(h,y)=\frac{d(h_*m)}{dm}(y)

is a continuous positive function on Y, given by a finite product, and

\rho(ag,y)=\rho(a,y)\rho(g,a^{-1}y). \tag{5.3}

Assign positive weights w(p) to rational points by requiring the ratio w(hp)/w(p) to be the product of the forward local volume Jacobians of h at p. To construct them, normalize the weight at one rational base point and transport by \widetilde G(k). Rational conjugacy of parabolics of the given type gives transitivity [2, Theorem 4.13(a,c)]. If two transporters give the same point, their quotient fixes the base point; the product of its tangent determinants is 1 by the product formula in k. This proves independence of the transporter. The same reasoning at rational fixed points proves the weight-ratio rule for every h\in\mathcal H, not just for \widetilde G(k).

We shall use

\sum_{p\in X(k)}w(p)^s<\infty\qquad(s>1). \tag{5.4}

Here is the convergence theorem and normalization involved. Let P be the stabilizing minimal k-parabolic. For a local decomposition g=k_0p_0 with k_0\in K_v and p_0\in P(k_v), the forward tangent Jacobian at the base point is \delta_P(p_0)^{-1}, where \delta_P is the modular character of P. After replacing g by g^{-1}, the sum in Equation 5.4 is the spherical minimal-parabolic Eisenstein sum with inducing character \delta_P^s. The derived Levi is k-anisotropic, since P is minimal and \widetilde G has relative rank one. More precisely, its Levi subgroup M is k-anisotropic modulo its maximal k-split central torus, so M(k)\backslash M(\bbA_k)^1 is compact, where the superscript 1 imposes adelic norm one for every k-rational character of M [25, Theorem 5.6]. The constant inducing function is therefore square-integrable modulo the split center and cuspidal, since M has no proper k-parabolics. The usual absolute-convergence theorem applies in the Godement domain \operatorname{Re}\lambda>\rho_P for normalized parameter \rho_P+\lambda, where 2\rho_P is the sum of the positive relative roots with multiplicities; see [18, Chapter 4, Lemma 4.1, and Appendix II]. For \delta_P^s this parameter is \lambda=(2s-1)\rho_P, and the domain is exactly s>1. We use the number-field adelic formulation, equivalently the arithmetic formulation after restriction of scalars and finite adelic double-coset decomposition.

Give (p,c(p))\in Y\times\mathcal C mass proportional to w(p)^s, and denote this probability by \mu_s. Its transformation rule is

\frac{d(h_*\mu_s)}{d\mu_s}(y,c)=\rho(h,y)^s.

The reciprocal in this formula is worth noting: the mass at hp after pushforward is the old mass at p, so the forward Jacobian is inverted. Take a weak limit \mu^0 as s\downarrow1. Compactness gives such a limit, and uniform convergence of \rho(h,\cdot)^s for each fixed h gives

h_*\mu^0=\rho(h,\cdot)\mu^0. \tag{5.5}

The base projection is the product measure. Let \nu be the projection of \mu^0 to Y. We prove \nu=m. Fix a sufficiently large finite set T of places containing the archimedean and model-exceptional places. Use subscripts T for products over T, and superscripts T for products over its complement. An arithmetic lattice \Gamma\subset\widetilde G_T, integral outside T, preserves the tail probability. Equation 5.5 therefore gives

\gamma_*\nu_T=\rho_T(\gamma,\cdot)\nu_T \qquad(\gamma\in\Gamma).

Define the continuous positive function

f(g)=\int_{Y_T}\rho_T(g,y)\,d\nu_T(y) \qquad(g\in\widetilde G_T).

The cocycle identity and the preceding transformation rule give f(\gamma g)=f(g).

Choose a full-support probability \eta on \widetilde G_T that is left invariant by K_T=\prod_{v\in T}K_v. Compact transitivity and \int\rho_T(h,y)\,dm_T(y)=1 imply

\int\rho_T(h,z)\,d\eta(h)=1\quad(z\in Y_T).

Indeed average first over left multiplication of h by K_T; the result averages \rho_T(h,\cdot) over m_T. Equation 5.3 now gives

f(g)=\int f(gh)\,d\eta(h).

This is a positive harmonic function on the finite-volume space \Gamma\backslash\widetilde G_T. To see it is constant without an unproved integrability assertion, apply Jensen’s inequality to the bounded strictly concave function q(t)=t/(1+t) for t>0. Its nonnegative Jensen discrepancy has integral zero over the quotient, by right invariance of the quotient volume. Equality in strict Jensen makes f(gh) constant for \eta-almost all h, for almost every coset g. Full support of \eta and continuity then make f constant everywhere. Its value is f(1)=1.

We still have to show that these integrals determine \nu_T. Choose a sequence a_j\in\widetilde G_T contracting the big cell of Y_T to a point x_0, using a split cocharacter for the parabolic at each place. The complement of that cell has m_T-measure zero, so (a_j)_*m_T\to\delta_{x_0}. For b\in C(Y_T) put

B_j(y)=\int_{K_T}b(k_0x_0)\rho_T(k_0a_j,y)\,dk_0.

Under the probability density \rho_T(k_0a_j,y)\,dk_0, the variable k_0^{-1}y has distribution (a_j)_*m_T: use compact invariance and push Haar measure on K_T onto Y_T. Compact equicontinuity shows that B_j(y)\to b(y) uniformly in y. On the other hand, f(k_0a_j)=1 gives

\int B_j\,d\nu_T =\int_{K_T}b(k_0x_0)\,dk_0 =\int b\,dm_T.

It follows that \nu_T=m_T. Exhausting the places proves \nu=m.

Disintegrate the joint law as

d\mu^0(y,c)=dQ_y(c)\,dm(y). \tag{5.6}

The spaces are compact metrizable, so regular conditional probabilities Q_y exist. Equation 5.5 gives Q_{hy}=h_*Q_y almost everywhere for each h. Since \mathcal H is countable, all these equalities may be imposed on a common conull set.

Uniform conditional color marginals. Write P(y) for the probability vector on \mathcal F which is the c_1-marginal of Q_y, and put N=\ker\phi\cap S(k). The exact palette identities

c_{L_a h}=\phi(a)c_h,\qquad c_{R_a h}=c_h\phi(a)

imply that P is invariant under the separate left and right rotations by every a\in N. We first upgrade this invariance at one completion, using a finite-volume unitary representation, and then use approximation away from that completion. No topology is placed on the abstract map \phi.

Enlarge T so that it contains a finite place v_0 where S has positive rank. On the u_T-chart, m_T is in the Haar measure class of U_T. Disintegrate this class along the determinant map. On a fiber of determinant \lambda choose a measurable representative d_\lambda\in U_T and write

u_T=g d_\lambda,\qquad g\in S_T.

The determinant map is a smooth group map onto its image, so the conditional measure class along its fibers is Haar measure on S_T. For almost every \lambda, the function P(gd_\lambda,y^T) is invariant under the diagonal left action of

\Gamma'=N\cap\{a\in S(k):a_v\text{ is integral for }v\notin T\}.

This is a finite-index subgroup of an arithmetic lattice. Consequently each component of P defines a bounded function on

\Gamma'\backslash(S_T\times Y^T). \tag{5.7}

The space has finite invariant measure, obtained from Haar measure on the group factor and m^T on the tail. For example, a measurable fundamental domain for \Gamma' in S_T, together with the tail, constructs this measure. Left integrality ensures that the tail action preserves m^T.

Right invariance by a\in\Gamma' acts on Equation 5.7 by

(g,y^T)\longmapsto (g d_\lambda a_Td_\lambda^{-1},\ R_a y^T).

These actions commute with the diagonal left action. The right tail rotations lie in a compact group of measure-preserving transformations, since all their local coordinates are integral outside T.

There is a sequence a_j\in\Gamma' escaping every compact set at v_0 and bounded in the other factors of S_T. To obtain it, use the finite-index closure of N and strong approximation off v_0 to find infinitely many elements in a fixed compact cylinder at all the other places. The full arithmetic diagonal is discrete, so a subsequence must escape at v_0. Pass to a subsequence on which the bounded factors and the compact tail rotations converge. The fixed conjugations by d_\lambda preserve these escape and convergence properties.

Let \mathcal L be the L^2 space of Equation 5.7, and decompose it into the S(k_{v_0})-invariant vectors and their orthogonal complement. Howe–Moore decay applies on the latter: S(k_{v_0}) is an isotropic simple local group, and local Kneser–Tits identifies it with the group generated by its root groups; see [15] or [6, Theorem 4.19 and Definition 4.23]. For completeness, let v be the projection of a component of P to this complement. The simultaneous right actions fixing P also fix v. They are products \pi(g_j)A_j, where g_j\to\infty in S(k_{v_0}) and the commuting unitary operators A_j converge strongly to a unitary operator A. Therefore

\|v\|^2 =\langle\pi(g_j)A_jv,v\rangle =\langle\pi(g_j)Av,v\rangle+o(1)\longrightarrow0.

Thus P is invariant under the full right S(k_{v_0}) action. All descent and invariance statements above hold on almost every determinant fiber by ordinary measure disintegration and countability of the rational groups. Strong continuity of the local and compact actions follows first on continuous compactly supported functions and then on L^2.

Full right S(k_{v_0})-invariance makes P(y) depend on u_{v_0} only through its determinant, up to null sets. We now return to the left invariance under N. Take a\in V_0. By Proposition 2.3, there are r_j\in R\subset N converging to a in the restricted adelic product away from v_0. On the space obtained by forgetting the determinant-one variable at v_0, the left rotations L_{r_j} converge to L_a. This convergence passes to bounded measurable functions in the required measure class: restricted adelic convergence places all sufficiently late r_j and a in the same integral compacts outside one fixed finite set; those tail actions preserve measure. At the finitely many remaining local factors, the smooth actions converge and their Radon–Nikodym densities are uniformly bounded. Approximate a bounded function in L^1 by continuous cylinder functions to pass invariance to the limit. The determinant at v_0 is unchanged by every element of S, so it causes no additional action on this reduced space. Since P is invariant under each L_{r_j}, it follows that P(L_a y)=P(y) almost everywhere for every a\in V_0.

Conditional equivariance and the left-rotation palette identity also give P(L_a y)=\phi(a)P(y). The image of V_0 is all of \mathcal F, so P(y) is the uniform probability almost everywhere. For arbitrary h, the equality Q_{hy}=h_*Q_y identifies the c_h-marginal at y with the c_1-marginal at hy. Nonsingularity therefore makes every conditional coordinate marginal uniform.

Additive averaging. We have obtained all colors with equal conditional probability, but the joint law is still conformal rather than translation invariant. On the additive chart over a finite set T, replace m_T in Equation 5.6 by additive Haar measure on J_T, keeping Q_y and the tail base m^T. The resulting \sigma-finite joint measure is invariant under every rational translation T_b integral outside T: Haar measure is translation invariant on J_T, the good integral translations preserve m^T, and the conditional laws are equivariant. Restrict to expanding Folner windows in J_T, divide by their Haar volumes, and project to \mathcal C. Any weak limit is invariant under all these translations. Every averaging measure already has uniform coordinate marginals, because the conditional marginals were uniform. Finally exhaust the places by such finite sets T and take another weak limit. Every b\in J(k) is integral off a sufficiently large T, so this limit has all the asserted invariances and marginals.

5.3 Fractional transformations and simultaneous color returns

Fix the conjugacy-invariant subset \mathcal S supplied by Lemma 5.2. We shall relate the colors of w and \tau_s w to returns under a quadratic additive translation. For w\in U(k) and s\in k, put

t=\frac{s}{s-2i},\qquad C=tw,\qquad R_C=(1-C^*)(1-C)^{-1},\qquad z=wR_C. \tag{5.8}

These expressions are defined for every s: i\notin k, and

d:=1-t\bar t=\frac{-4i^2}{s^2-4i^2}\ne0.

The elements C and C^* commute, and CC^*=t\bar t is central. Division and d\ne0 imply that 1-C and 1-C^* are invertible. It follows that R_C is unitary and commutes with w. Hence z is unitary and commutes with w. Direct Cayley substitution gives

z=(w-\bar t)(1-tw)^{-1} =\frac{2i-s}{2i+s}\,\tau_s(w). \tag{5.9}

The scalar factor is central and has norm one, so \phi(z)=\phi(\tau_s(w)).

For such a C, the fractional transformation

D_C(u)=(u+C)(C^*u+1)^{-1}

is induced by a form similitude: its matrix \left(\begin{smallmatrix}1&C\\C^*&1\end{smallmatrix}\right) has multiplier 1-t\bar t. The denominator is invertible for unitary u; otherwise it vanishes, which would force t\bar t=1. Writing u=wa shows that

w^{-1}D_C(u)=(a+t)(\bar t a+1)^{-1} \quad\text{commutes with }a=w^{-1}u. \tag{5.10}

This calculation does not commute u with w.

Starting from a variable u\in U(k), define

v=D_{C^*}(uR_C),\qquad u'=R_C D_{-C}(v).

Apply Equation 5.10 first with unitary parameter w^{-1} and scalar \bar t. It gives [wv,wuR_C]=1; conjugating by w^{-1} gives [vw,uz]=1. Applying the same equation with scalar -t gives [w^{-1}v,z^{-1}u']=1. Thus, writing

W=\phi(w),\quad Z=\phi(z),\quad X_1=\phi(u),\quad Y_1=\phi(v),\quad X_1'=\phi(u'),

we have

[Y_1W,X_1Z]=1,\qquad [W^{-1}Y_1,Z^{-1}X_1']=1. \tag{5.11}

The transformation u\mapsto u' is an additive translation. Indeed its fractional matrix is

\begin{align*} &\diag(R_C,1) \begin{pmatrix}1&-C\\-C^*&1\end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix}1&C^*\\C&1\end{pmatrix} \diag(1,R_C^{-1})\\ &\hspace{35mm}= \begin{pmatrix}d+C-C^*&-(C-C^*)\\ C-C^*&d-(C-C^*)\end{pmatrix}.\end{align*}

After dividing by d and applying it to the column (x+i,x-i), the result is translation by 2i(C-C^*)/d. Expanding the latter gives

b_w(s)=-(w+w^*)s-\frac{w-w^*}{2i}s^2\in J(k). \tag{5.12}

The matrix calculation includes the point \infty of the additive chart. Neither w nor the variable point is required to have a finite Cayley coordinate.

Suppose that, for this fixed translation T_{b_w(s)}, every color occurs as X_1=X_1' at some rational point; different colors may use different points. Put B=Z^{-1}X_1. Equations 5.11 then imply

A:=W^{-1}Y_1\in C(B),\qquad D_0:=Z^{-1}Y_1WZ\in C(BZ^2).

Since WZ=ZW, direct multiplication gives

A^{-1}(ZW^{-1})D_0=ZW.

As X_1 ranges over \mathcal F, so does B, and this is exactly Equation 5.1. Consequently

\begin{gathered} \phi(w)\in\mathcal S,\quad\phi(\tau_s w)\notin\mathcal S\quad\Longrightarrow\\ \text{not every color can recur under }T_{b_w(s)}. \end{gathered} \tag{5.13}

When s=0, the translation is the identity and Z=W, so this implication has no degenerate exception.

5.4 Uniform finite witnesses for recurrence

The translation-invariant law of Proposition 5.3 will now force simultaneous returns. Uniformity is essential: it lets us pass the resulting restrictions from rational palettes to their closure. A subset D_0 of the additive group k is called thick if it contains a translate of every finite subset of k.

Lemma 5.4. Let 0<\delta\leq1.

  1. (i)

    There is an integer r=r(\delta)\geq2 such that, for every probability-preserving action T of \bbZ^2 and every event E of probability \delta, some 1\leq j\leq r satisfies

    \mathbb P(E\cap T_{(j,j^2)}^{-1}E)>0.
  2. (ii)

    For every thick set D_0\subset k, there is a finite subset F_0\subset D_0, depending only on D_0,k,\delta, such that for every probability-preserving action T of the discrete group k^2 and every event E of probability \delta, some s\in F_0 satisfies

    \mathbb P(E\cap T_{(s,s^2)}^{-1}E)>0.

Proof. For an action of either abelian group, the spectral measure \sigma of 1_E is a positive measure on the compact character group, of total mass \delta, with

\sigma(\{1\})=\|\operatorname{proj}_{\rm inv}1_E\|_2^2 \geq\delta^2. \tag{5.14}

Its Fourier coefficient at a is the return correlation \mathbb P(E\cap T_a^{-1}E), in particular a nonnegative real number. The atom lower bound is preserved under weak limits: for the closed singleton \{1\} the limit mass is at least the upper limit of the approximating masses.

For (ii), suppose no finite F_0 works. Enumerate D_0 and choose a counterexample to each initial finite set. Compactness of the spectral measures gives a limit \sigma satisfying Equation 5.14 and having Fourier coefficient zero at (s,s^2) for every s\in D_0. Take finite Folner sets F_j\subset(k,+) and translates E_j=t_j+F_j\subset D_0. We show that the average over E_j of

f(s)=\chi_1(s)\chi_2(s^2)

tends to zero for every nontrivial character pair (\chi_1,\chi_2). If \chi_2=1, this is ordinary averaging of a nontrivial linear character. Such averaging is uniform in t_j, since a translate only multiplies the average by a scalar of absolute value one. If \chi_2\ne1, choose M distinct shifts a_1,\ldots,a_M\in k. Folner invariance allows replacement of the average of f by the average of M^{-1}\sum_\ell f(s+a_\ell), with error tending to zero independently of the translate. Cauchy–Schwarz, followed by expansion, therefore gives

\begin{align*} \limsup_j\left|\frac1{|E_j|}\sum_{s\in E_j}f(s)\right|^2 &\leq\frac1M+ \frac1{M^2}\sum_{\ell\ne q} \limsup_j\left|\frac1{|E_j|}\sum_{s\in E_j} \chi_2(2(a_\ell-a_q)s)\right|\\ &=\frac1M.\end{align*}

All off-diagonal characters are nontrivial because multiplication by 2(a_\ell-a_q)\ne0 is onto k. Letting M\to\infty proves the claim. Dominated convergence against \sigma now says that the average of its coefficients at (s,s^2) over E_j tends to \sigma(\{1\})>0, contradicting their vanishing.

For (i), failure of every bound r similarly gives a measure \sigma on \bbR^2/\bbZ^2 satisfying Equation 5.14 and having coefficient zero at every (j,j^2) with j\geq1. Write a character phase as \exp(2\pi\mathrm i(\alpha j+\beta j^2)), where here \mathrm i is the usual complex imaginary unit. Choose finitely many pairs with both \alpha,\beta rational, including the trivial pair, so that the remaining rational-pair mass is less than \varepsilon<\delta^2. Choose a positive integer M divisible by their denominators, for example a sufficiently large factorial. Along j=M\ell, all selected phases are 1. Every pair with at least one irrational coefficient has average zero by the degree-two form of Weyl’s theorem [44]. For the unselected rational pairs the absolute contribution is bounded by \varepsilon; their individual averages exist by periodicity. Dominated convergence makes the limiting average at least \delta^2-\varepsilon>0, again a contradiction. Increasing the resulting bound to at least 2 is harmless.

Apply the lemma to independent copies of (\mathcal C,\mu) indexed by a\in\mathcal F, and to the event

E=\{(c^{(a)})_{a\in\mathcal F}:c^{(a)}_1=a \text{ for every }a\in\mathcal F\}.

Its probability is the fixed number \delta=|\mathcal F|^{-|\mathcal F|}>0. Writing b_w(s)=sA_w+s^2B_w as in Equation 5.12, use the k^2-action

(a,b)\longmapsto T_{aA_w+bB_w}

on this product space. Positive return of E yields every recurrent color in some palette. Each required two-coordinate pattern then occurs rationally, so Equation 5.13 applies. For part (i), and any u_0\in k, use instead the \bbZ^2-action

(a,b)\longmapsto T_{a u_0A_w+b u_0^2B_w}.

We have obtained two statements uniform in w:

  1. (a)

    for every u_0\in k, some s\in\{u_0,2u_0,\ldots,ru_0\} gives simultaneous recurrence of all colors;

  2. (b)

    for every fixed thick D_0\subset k, a fixed finite subset of D_0 contains such an s for every w.

The second finite subset is not asserted to be uniform over thick sets.

5.5 Additive invariance of membership in the finite subset

Fix c\in\mathcal C and a prefix h\in\mathcal H, and set

C_0=\{x\in k:c_{\tau_xh}\notin\mathcal S\}.

If x\notin C_0, then C_0-x cannot contain \{u_0,2u_0,\ldots,ru_0\} for any u_0\in k. Indeed, match the finitely many relevant coordinates by a rational palette and apply statement (a) to its rational point w=u(\tau_xhp). This contradicts Equation 5.13. Nor can C_0-x be thick: apply statement (b) to that particular thick set and match the finitely many witness coordinates by a rational palette. The same contradiction results.

We record explicitly the combinatorial consequence:

C_0=k\quad\text{or}\quad C_0\text{ has zero upper Banach density}. \tag{5.15}

For this purpose the upper Banach density of C\subset k is the supremum of M(1_C) over translation-invariant means M on bounded functions on the discrete additive group k. Such means exist because this group is abelian. If this density is zero, the density of C along every Folner sequence tends to zero: a nonzero upper limit would yield an invariant mean with positive value by taking a weak limit of the averaging functionals.

First, a run of r consecutive points of C_0 in a direction u_0 extends to the adjacent point on either side. Otherwise that adjacent point, lying outside C_0, would have the forbidden run immediately ahead in direction u_0 or -u_0. Iteration fills the entire integer progression.

Suppose now that C_0 has positive upper Banach density. To prove it thick, fix any finite list g_1,\ldots,g_d\in k, and choose an invariant mean M with M(1_{C_0})>\eta>0. The finite multidimensional Szemeredi theorem supplies a box size N_0 such that every subset of \{1,\ldots,N_0\}^d of density at least \eta contains an affine homothetic copy of \{0,\ldots,r-1\}^d, with positive integer dilation \ell\leq N_0. This is the finite-box form of the density theorem of [12, Theorem B]. Put L_0=\operatorname{lcm}(1,\ldots,N_0) and average, with respect to M, the density of the pullback of C_0 under

(m_1,\ldots,m_d)\longmapsto x+\sum_{j=1}^d m_jg_j/L_0.

Translation invariance makes this average M(1_{C_0})>\eta, so one translate has pullback density at least \eta. Injectivity of this box map is not required. The resulting homothetic r-box lies in C_0, with steps \ell g_j/L_0. Extend progressions successively along each coordinate axis. This fills the whole integer grid with these steps. Because \ell divides L_0, that grid contains a translate of \{0,g_1,\ldots,g_d\}. Thus C_0 is thick. If any x were outside C_0, then C_0-x would also be thick, contrary to the preceding restriction. This proves Equation 5.15.

Now let the palette be random with law \mu. For a fixed Folner sequence, Equation 5.15 makes the densities of C_0 converge pointwise to 1_{\{C_0=k\}}. Uniform coordinate marginals and dominated convergence give

\mathbb P(C_0=k)=\frac{|\mathcal F\setminus\mathcal S|}{|\mathcal F|}.

For each s, the event C_0=k is contained in s\in C_0, and the latter has exactly this same probability. Therefore

1_{\mathcal S}(c_{\tau_sh})=1_{\mathcal S}(c_h) \quad\text{almost surely for every }s\in k,\ h\in\mathcal H. \tag{5.16}

Countability makes these identities simultaneous for all s,h. The palette rules also give, for every prefix h, invariance of this indicator under left rotation by any element of \ker\phi and under conjugation by any element of U(k), since \mathcal S is conjugacy-invariant. These are exact finite-coordinate identities, so they hold throughout \mathcal C.

We have reached a concrete restriction on a common full-measure set of palettes: membership of a color in \mathcal S is unchanged under scalar additive translations, kernel left rotations, and all unitary conjugations, at every prefix. It remains to show that these transformations already force invariance under all left colors.

5.6 Generating left rotations by squares

Let \mathcal K be the subgroup of \mathcal H generated by the three classes of transformations just listed. Equation 5.16 and the simultaneous prefix identities show that

1_{\mathcal S}(c_{ah})=1_{\mathcal S}(c_h) \qquad(a\in\mathcal K,\ h\in\mathcal H) \tag{5.17}

on one set of full measure. This assertion is obtained by composing finite-coordinate identities; it does not assume that \mu is invariant under the whole group \mathcal K.

Fix \xi\in U(k). The commutative algebra E=L(\xi) is a field, since D is division, and it is stable under * because \xi^*=\xi^{-1}. Let E_0 be its fixed field, so E=LE_0 and [E:E_0]=2. Write E^1 for its norm-one group to E_0. Choose n_0\in E^1\cap\ker\phi whose finite Cayley coordinate x_0\in E_0 generates E_0 over k. Such a choice is possible: the rational norm-one torus is Zariski dense by its Cayley parametrization, the power map on that torus is dominant, and powers of an exponent killing \mathcal F lie in \ker\phi. The requirement that x_0 be finite and primitive is a nonempty Zariski-open condition.

Since there are only finitely many colors, choose t_0\in k for which the set

I=\{s\in k:\phi(\tau_sn_0)=\phi(\tau_{t_0}n_0)\}

is infinite. For each s\in I, the word

H_s=L_{n_0}^{-1}\tau_s^{-1} L_{(\tau_sn_0)(\tau_{t_0}n_0)^{-1}} \tau_{t_0}L_{n_0} \tag{5.18}

belongs to \mathcal K. Both indicated left rotations have kernel parameters. The word successively sends 1 to n_0, to \tau_{t_0}n_0, to \tau_sn_0, to n_0, and back to 1. It is represented by a fractional matrix over E; fixing 1 in the unitary chart means fixing infinity in the additive chart. Its latter matrix is therefore upper triangular, say

\begin{pmatrix}\alpha&\gamma\\0&\beta\end{pmatrix}, \qquad\alpha,\beta\in E^\times.

On the commutative E_0-chart its affine multiplier is

a_s=\frac{\alpha}{\beta} =\frac{(x_0+t_0)^2-i^2}{(x_0+s)^2-i^2}\in E_0^\times. \tag{5.19}

To check the multiplier, use q'(x)/q(x)=-2i/(x^2-i^2) in Equation 5.18. The derivative at u=1 is ((x_0+s)^2-i^2)/((x_0+t_0)^2-i^2); the affine multiplier at infinity is its reciprocal. All denominators are nonzero because x_0+s\in E_0 whereas i\notin E_0.

This commutative calculation produces transformations on the full noncommutative chart, not merely on E_0. Conjugating T_{s'} by the upper triangular matrix gives the matrix

\begin{pmatrix}1&\alpha s'\beta^{-1}\\0&1\end{pmatrix} =\begin{pmatrix}1&s'a_s\\0&1\end{pmatrix} \qquad(s'\in k),

since s' is central. Thus \mathcal K contains translations by every k-multiple of a_s, and hence by their k-linear span.

That span is all of E_0. Indeed suppose a nonzero k-linear functional on E_0 annihilated all the a_s with s\in I. Extend scalars to an algebraic closure and write this functional as a linear combination of the distinct embeddings of E_0, which may be extended while fixing L. Put x_j for the corresponding distinct conjugates of x_0. We obtain a linear combination, zero for infinitely many s, of the rational functions

\frac{(x_j+t_0)^2-i^2}{(x_j+s)^2-i^2}. \tag{5.20}

It must vanish identically. These functions are linearly independent. Their poles are -x_j+i and -x_j-i. Poles from distinct denominators can coincide only when the corresponding centers differ by 2i or -2i. The resulting finite components form chains: each center has at most one successor and predecessor, and characteristic zero excludes cycles. An endpoint pole belongs to just one denominator, so its coefficient in any linear relation is zero. Remove that denominator and repeat along the chain. All numerators in Equation 5.20 are nonzero, so every coefficient vanishes, the required contradiction. Consequently \mathcal K contains all E_0-translations.

Left rotation by -1 belongs to \mathcal K, because -1 is a central kernel scalar. In the additive chart it is x\mapsto i^2/x, represented by an antidiagonal matrix over k. It conjugates all upper E_0-unipotents to all lower E_0-unipotents. These generate \SL_2(E_0), so \mathcal K contains the corresponding fractional transformations of the full chart. In particular it contains the transformation whose matrix in the unitary chart is \diag(\xi,\xi^{-1}): its conjugate by the Cayley change of basis is

\frac12 \begin{pmatrix} \xi+\xi^{-1}&i(\xi-\xi^{-1})\\ (\xi-\xi^{-1})/i&\xi+\xi^{-1} \end{pmatrix}\in\SL_2(E_0).

Its action is u\mapsto\xi u\xi. Composing with the allowed conjugation u\mapsto\xi u\xi^{-1} gives u\mapsto\xi^2u. Hence

L_{\xi^2}\in\mathcal K\qquad(\xi\in U(k)). \tag{5.21}

Proof of Theorem 5.1. All the preceding constructions were made under the assumption that \phi exists. Choose a palette satisfying the simultaneous identities in Equation 5.17. Such palettes have probability one by Proposition 5.3 and the recurrence argument. Equations 5.17 and 5.21, together with the exact left-rotation palette rule, make membership in \mathcal S invariant under left multiplication by every square in \mathcal F, at all prefixes. The subgroup generated by all squares is characteristic and nontrivial in the nonabelian simple group \mathcal F: a group in which every square is 1 is abelian. Thus the squares generate \mathcal F. Starting at the identity coordinate of the chosen palette, their left multiplications run through every color. The membership indicator would therefore have the same value on all of \mathcal F, contrary to \mathcal S being nonempty and proper. This contradiction proves the theorem, subject to Lemma 5.2, whose proof follows.

6 The finite simple-group obstruction

We prove Lemma 5.2. The argument uses the classification of finite simple groups [1, Classification Theorem, p. 737]. Two elementary tests handle the alternating, linear, and sporadic families. A counting argument in a full unitary group handles the other classical families, and small maximal tori handle the exceptional families.

Throughout this section, \mathcal F is a finite nonabelian simple group, C(B)=C_{\mathcal F}(B), and

I(\mathcal F)=\{g\in\mathcal F:g^2=1\},\qquad k(\mathcal F)=\text{the number of conjugacy classes of }\mathcal F.

For commuting W,Z\in\mathcal F, the condition to be excluded is

ZW\in C(B)(ZW^{-1})C(BZ^2) \quad\text{for every }B\in\mathcal F. \tag{6.1}

The choice of the nonempty proper conjugacy-invariant set \mathcal S will be specified in each family. In every case we show that Equation (6.1) is incompatible with W\in\mathcal S and Z\notin\mathcal S.

6.1 Two elementary tests

First take

\mathcal S=\{W\in\mathcal F:W^2\ne1\}. \tag{6.2}

This set is nonempty, since a group of exponent two is abelian, and it does not contain the identity. For commuting W\in\mathcal S and Z\notin\mathcal S, put v=ZW. Then Z^2=1, v^2=W^2\ne1, and Equation (6.1) becomes

v\in C(B)v^{-1}C(B)\quad\text{for every }B\in\mathcal F. \tag{6.3}

Suppose that \mathcal F acts on a set and that some point p satisfies v^2p\ne p. If C(B) fixes p and vp pointwise, writing v=a v^{-1}b with a,b\in C(B) gives vp=a v^{-1}p. Applying a^{-1} gives vp=v^{-1}p, a contradiction. We call this the point-pair test. We will also use its incidence version: if C(B) fixes a line p and preserves a subspace L, while vp\subset L and v^{-1}p\not\subset L, the same equation is impossible.

The second test uses a self-centralizing abelian subgroup.

Lemma 6.1. Suppose that C\subset\mathcal F is an abelian subgroup of odd order c>1 such that C_{\mathcal F}(t)=C for every 1\ne t\in C. If

|\mathcal F|>k(\mathcal F)c^4, \tag{6.4}

then the union \mathcal S of the conjugates of C\setminus\{1\} has the property required in Lemma 5.2.

Proof. The set is nonempty and excludes the identity. If W\in\mathcal S and Z commutes with W, then Z lies in the same conjugate of C as W. Consequently Z\notin\mathcal S forces Z=1.

Conjugate W into C. Testing Equation (6.3) with every conjugate of a fixed nonidentity element of C shows that every conjugate v of W belongs to Cv^{-1}C. If v=a v^{-1}b, a,b\in C, then

(v b^{-1})^2=a b^{-1}\in C.

If this square is nonidentity, v b^{-1} centralizes a nonidentity element of C, so v\in C. Otherwise v\in I(\mathcal F)C. Since I(\mathcal F) is conjugacy-invariant, I(\mathcal F)C=CI(\mathcal F). Thus the whole conjugacy class of W lies in CI(\mathcal F), and

\frac{|\mathcal F|}{c}\le c|I(\mathcal F)|.

The Frobenius–Schur formula and Cauchy–Schwarz give

|I(\mathcal F)| =\sum_{\chi\in\operatorname{Irr}(\mathcal F)}\nu_2(\chi)\chi(1) \le\sum_\chi\chi(1) \le\sqrt{k(\mathcal F)|\mathcal F|}.

These inequalities contradict Equation (6.4).

6.2 Alternating, linear, and sporadic groups

For alternating and projective special linear groups we use Equation (6.2). In A_n, choose p with v^2p\ne p. There is an even permutation B fixing exactly p,vp and having distinct odd cycle lengths greater than one on the remaining points, except when n=6 or 8. Indeed, for odd n use the single cycle of length n-2, and for even n\ge10 use lengths 3,n-5. Every permutation centralizing these moving cycles is even on their support. Therefore a centralizer element in A_n cannot interchange the two fixed points. The point-pair test applies. The two exceptions are A_6\simeq\PSL_2(9) and A_8\simeq\PSL_4(2).

Now let \mathcal F=\PSL_l(q), l\ge3. Choose a line p such that v^2p\ne p. The three lines p,vp,v^{-1}p are distinct. A hyperplane L can be chosen to contain vp and contain neither p nor v^{-1}p: in the quotient by vp, choose a linear functional nonzero on both remaining nonzero vectors. The union of two proper hyperplanes in the dual is not the entire dual, also over \bbF_2.

On the direct sum p\oplus L, take B to be the identity on p and an irreducible norm-one field multiplication on L. Such an element exists in the cyclic group of order (q^{l-1}-1)/(q-1): a generator cannot lie in a proper subfield, since that group’s order exceeds q^{(l-1)/2}-1 when l-1\ge2. A projective centralizer of B is an actual centralizer. Indeed, scalar multiplication must preserve its unique base-field eigenvalue, which is 1, and hence the multiplier is 1. The centralizer fixes p and preserves L, contradicting the incidence version of Equation (6.3).

For simple \PSL_2(q), the pointwise stabilizer of two points of the projective line is a split torus. It contains an element whose centralizer fixes both points, unless q=5: its order is q-1 for even q and (q-1)/2 for odd q, and a noninvolution in it is regular with that torus as centralizer. The case q=5 is A_5. Choosing the torus for p,vp proves the assertion in all these cases.

For the sporadic groups other than M_{12}, and also for the Tits group, Table 1 gives a prime c for which a cyclic subgroup of order c is the centralizer of each of its nonidentity elements. The centralizer orders, class numbers, and group orders are those in the Atlas and the online ATLAS of Finite Group Representations [9, 45]. In each row, an element x in the class labeled c\mathrm A in that group’s conjugacy-class table has C(x)=\langle x\rangle of order c. Since c is prime, every nonidentity power of x has the same centralizer. The displayed k is the exact class number. In every row the group order exceeds kc^4, so Lemma 6.1 applies. For example, the smallest margin is 10\cdot5^4=6250<7920=|M_{11}|. One may also check the other inequalities using k\le200, except that k\le25 suffices for M_{22},M_{23},J_1.

GroupckGroupck
M_{11}510\mathrm{O'N}3130
M_{22}1112\mathrm{Co}_123101
M_{23}2317\mathrm{Co}_22360
M_{24}2326\mathrm{Co}_32342
J_1715\mathrm{Fi}_{22}1365
J_2721\mathrm{Fi}_{23}2398
J_31921\mathrm{Fi}_{24}'29108
J_44362\mathrm{HN}1954
\mathrm{HS}1124\mathrm{Ly}6753
\mathrm{McL}1124\mathrm{Th}3148
\mathrm{He}1733\mathbb B47184
\mathrm{Ru}2936\mathbb M71194
\mathrm{Suz}1343{}^2F_4(2)'1322

Table 1: Self-centralizing prime-order subgroups for the sporadic and Tits groups.

For M_{12} use its sharply 5-transitive action of degree 12 and the Atlas class 8B, of cycle shape 1^2\,2\,8 [9, 45]; in the online database these are the M_{12} degree-12 representation and its class 8B. An element centralizing B\in8B restricts to a cyclic shift on its eight-point orbit. This restriction is injective: its kernel fixes eight points, and an element fixing five points is the identity. The centralizer is therefore exactly \langle B\rangle, and fixes the two fixed points individually. Two-transitivity moves this pair to p,vp, so the point-pair test applies with Equation (6.2).

6.3 An auxiliary unitary count

The remaining classical groups need a torus argument on a large irreducible block. The relevant obstruction takes place in the full unitary isometry group, which need not itself be simple.

Lemma 6.2. Let p\ge3 be an odd prime, let H=\U_p(q) be the full isometry group of a nondegenerate Hermitian form over \bbF_{q^2}, and let T\subset H be an irreducible torus of order q^p+1. If w\in T has field degree p over \bbF_{q^2}, then

w\in T^h w^{-1}T^h\quad\text{for every }h\in H

is impossible.

Proof. Put

\overline H=H/Z(H),\qquad \overline T=T/Z(H),\qquad c=\frac{q^p+1}{q+1},\qquad d=(p,q+1).

The actual centralizer of w is T. If g centralizes its projective image, then gwg^{-1}=\lambda w for a scalar \lambda of norm one. Taking determinants gives \lambda^p=1, so

|C_{\overline H}(\overline w)|\le dc. \tag{6.5}

Suppose the displayed condition in the lemma holds. Every conjugate v of w then lies in Tv^{-1}T. The calculation used in Lemma 6.1 gives an element u=v b^{-1} whose square lies in T. If u^2 is nonscalar, it has field degree p, because p is prime; its centralizer is T, and hence u\in T. If u^2 is scalar, \overline u has square one. Consequently the entire projective conjugacy class of \overline w lies in \overline T I(\overline H).

The determinant quotient of \overline H has order d, and \overline T maps onto it. To see this, write T as the norm-one subgroup of \bbF_{q^{2p}}^\times over \bbF_{q^p}. The determinant of a field multiplication is its norm to \bbF_{q^2}. On this torus, that norm takes a generator to a generator of the scalar norm-one group of order q+1; its exponent is congruent to c modulo q^p+1. Modding out by scalar matrices mods the determinant out by pth powers, giving the quotient of order d.

All members of the conjugacy class have the same determinant in this quotient. For each fixed i\in I(\overline H), at most c/d elements t\in\overline T have ti with that determinant. Combining this with Equation (6.5) gives

\frac{|\overline H|}{dc} \le \frac c d |I(\overline H)|, \qquad\text{and therefore}\qquad |\overline H|\le c^2|I(\overline H)|.

We show that the reverse strict inequality always holds.

Every projective involution lifts to an involution in H. Indeed, if g^2=\alpha I, then \alpha^p=\det(g)^2 in the scalar cyclic group of order q+1. As p is odd, \alpha is a square in that group, and scalar rescaling gives an involution.

For odd q, an involution is determined up to conjugacy by the dimensions a,p-a of its two nondegenerate eigenspaces. Projectively the unordered partitions are indexed by 1\le a<p/2, and their centralizers have order at least

\frac{|\U_a(q)|\,|\U_{p-a}(q)|}{q+1}. \tag{6.6}

For even q, the Jordan type is 2^a1^b, where b=p-2a. Its full unitary centralizer has order

q^{a^2+2ab}|\U_a(q)|\,|\U_b(q)|. \tag{6.7}

Here is the structure behind this formula. In the ambient general linear group the connected matrix centralizer has reductive quotient \GL_a\times\GL_b and unipotent radical of dimension a^2+2ab. The Hermitian Frobenius gives the unitary forms on both multiplicity spaces. Equivalently, for g=1+N of order two, N=N^*; the induced forms on \ker N/\im N and, using N, on the quotient by \ker N are the forms on these two spaces. Nondegenerate Hermitian forms of a given dimension over a finite field are isometric. Connectedness and Lang’s theorem give one full-unitary class for each occurring type and the stated order. Dividing by q+1 gives a lower bound for its projective centralizer.

The unitary order formula implies

|\U_j(q)|=q^{j^2}\prod_{r=1}^j(1-(-q)^{-r})\ge q^{j^2}. \tag{6.8}

For completeness, pair consecutive factors: their product is

(1+q^{-(2r-1)})(1-q^{-2r}) =1+q^{-2r}(q-1-q^{-(2r-1)})>1.

An unpaired final factor also exceeds one. Thus every nonidentity projective involution class has centralizer order at least

M=\frac{q^{(p^2+1)/2}}{q+1}.

There are at most (p-1)/2 such classes, and including the identity gives

\frac{|I(\overline H)|}{|\overline H|}\le\frac{p+1}{2M}.

When p\ge5, we have c<q^{p-1} and

\frac{M}{q^{2p-2}} =\frac{q^{(p^2-4p+5)/2}}{q+1} \ge\frac{2^p}{3}>\frac{p+1}{2}.

The first inequality uses (p^2-4p+5)/2\ge p and monotonicity in q\ge2. This proves c^2|I(\overline H)|<|\overline H|.

It remains to check p=3. Now

c=q^2-q+1,\qquad h=|\overline H|=q^3(q^3+1)(q^2-1).

There is one nonidentity involution class. In odd characteristic its centralizer lower bound is M=q(q-1)(q+1)^2, and h/M=q^2c. In even characteristic it is M=q^3(q+1), and h/M=(q^2-1)c. In both cases |I(\overline H)|\le1+q^2c, whereas

h-c^2(1+q^2c) =c\bigl((3q-4)q^4+(q-2)q^2+q-1\bigr)>0 \quad(q\ge2).

This includes \U_3(2) and finishes the proof.

6.4 Symplectic and orthogonal groups

Let \mathcal F be a projective symplectic or orthogonal simple group on its natural space of dimension 2l or 2l+1. We first treat l\ge3, using the standard low-rank identifications and treating \PSp_4 separately below. Choose an odd prime

l/2<p\le l, \tag{6.9}

requiring p<l in plus orthogonal type. For l\ge4, set m=\lfloor l/2\rfloor\ge2. Bertrand’s postulate gives m<p<2m, hence l/2<p<l, and this prime is odd. For l=3 take p=3, apart from plus type, which is \PSL_4 and has already been treated. In odd-dimensional orthogonal type we may assume odd characteristic, since in even characteristic the group has the corresponding symplectic realization.

We use a nondegenerate block E of dimension 2p carrying a torus of order q^p+1. In orthogonal type this block has minus type; the complement can be chosen with the sign needed for the ambient form. For minus type p=l the block is the whole space, whereas the requirement p<l in plus type leaves a complement of the necessary sign. The torus is the norm-one subgroup of \bbF_{q^{2p}}^\times over \bbF_{q^p}, acting on E by field multiplication.

Define \mathcal S to consist of those projective elements whose square, on the natural space, has an irreducible self-dual block of dimension 2p. This condition is independent of the choice of a scalar lift and is conjugacy-invariant. The block is unique, because 4p>2l+1, and is nondegenerate: its dual would otherwise require a second block of the same degree. The set excludes identity and is nonempty. Indeed, if t generates the torus of order q^p+1, use t^2 on the block and identity on the complement. Squaring meets the orthogonal component and spinor conditions, whose quotients have exponent two. Moreover t^4 still has degree 2p. To see this, the quotient of the norm-one torus by its intersection with \bbF_{q^2}^{\times} has odd order

\frac{q^p+1}{q+1}>1.

Thus t^4\notin\bbF_{q^2}. The only other maximal proper subfield is \bbF_{q^p}, where a norm-one element is \pm1 and hence already lies in \bbF_{q^2}.

Suppose now that W\in\mathcal S, that Z\notin\mathcal S commutes with W, and that Equation (6.1) holds. Lift W,Z to natural isometries, using \Omega in orthogonal type. Their possible projective commutation multiplier has order at most two. They therefore commute actually with W^2 and preserve its unique marked block E. On E they act as field multiplications w,z\in\bbF_{q^{2p}}^\times of norm one. Since Z\notin\mathcal S, z^2 lies in a proper subfield. The norm-one condition puts z^2 in \bbF_{q^2}, and then z itself is in \bbF_{q^2}: its degree over that field divides both p and 2.

There is a full unitary group H=\U_p(q) acting on E and containing its field torus T. One way to see this directly is to write the invariant form in field coordinates. Its bilinear form has the shape

\Tr_{\bbF_{q^{2p}}/\bbF_q}(\kappa x y^*),\qquad x^*=x^{q^p}.

Take the trace first to \bbF_{q^2}. If the resulting form is anti-Hermitian and the characteristic is odd, multiply it by \delta\in\bbF_{q^2}^{\times} with \delta^q=-\delta; this makes it Hermitian without changing its isometry group. In characteristic two an anti-Hermitian form is already Hermitian. This gives the required unitary structure. In the quadratic case the form is

Q(x)=\Tr_{\bbF_{q^p}/\bbF_q}(\kappa xx^*), \qquad\kappa\in\bbF_{q^p}^\times.

In characteristic two this expression follows from the polarization and W^2-invariance: two invariant quadratic forms with the same polarization differ by the square of an invariant linear form, and an irreducible block of degree greater than one has no such nonzero form. These formulas show that H preserves the original form on E. The element z is a scalar of this unitary group.

For each h\in H, choose B acting on E by a square of a generator of T^h and as identity on the complement. This is an allowed ambient element. Even if h is not in \Omega, conjugation by an isometry preserves \Omega, so the orthogonal component condition is unchanged. Both B and BZ^2 have a unique marked square block E: multiplication of a full-degree element by a base-field scalar preserves its degree over \bbF_{q^2}, and the norm-one condition then gives full degree 2p over \bbF_q.

Each projective centralizer of B or BZ^2 commutes actually with its square, preserves E, and restricts there into T^h. This does not require the action on the complement to be semisimple; the complement is too small to have an irreducible factor of degree 2p. Restricting Equation (6.1) to E and absorbing its scalar multipliers and the scalar z into T^h therefore gives

w\in T^h w^{-1}T^h\quad\text{for every }h\in H.

The element w has degree p over \bbF_{q^2}. This contradicts Lemma 6.2.

6.5 Projective unitary groups and rank two symplectic groups

Let \mathcal F=\PSU_l(q), l\ge3, excluding the nonsimple pair (l,q)=(3,2). Choose an odd prime l/2<p\le l. Define \mathcal S by requiring the square of a natural lift to have an irreducible block of degree p over \bbF_{q^2}. As above this block is unique and nondegenerate. If l>p, the determinant of a chosen torus element on the block can be corrected on its nonzero dimensional orthogonal complement. If l=p, use instead the determinant-one torus of order

c=\frac{q^p+1}{q+1}.

Its scalar intersection has order d=(p,q+1). Except for (p,q)=(3,2), c>d: for p\ge5, c\ge q^{p-2}(q-1)+1\ge2^{p-2}+1>p, and for p=3,q\ge3, c\ge7>3. As c is odd, a generator and its square are both nonscalar and hence have degree p. This proves that \mathcal S is nonempty; it again excludes identity.

We check the projective-centralizer issue before applying the block argument. Suppose gAg^{-1}=\lambda A, where A\in\SU_l(q) has the marked square block. Multiplication by a base-field scalar preserves irreducible degrees, so g preserves the unique block. The determinant on the block gives \lambda^p=1, and the total determinant gives \lambda^l=1. If l>p, then p<l<2p, so these conditions force \lambda=1. If l=p and \lambda\ne1, multiplication by \lambda cycles all p distinct eigenvalues. Their product is w^p, since p is odd, and determinant one gives w^p=1. But \lambda has order p in the scalar group, so p\mid q+1; all pth roots of unity then lie in \bbF_{q^2}, contradicting the full degree of w. Thus these projective centralizers are actual centralizers on the block.

For commuting W\in\mathcal S and Z\notin\mathcal S, the restrictions are consequently field scalars w,z, with z\in\bbF_{q^2} by the same odd-degree argument as before. For every conjugate T^h in the full block unitary group choose B with irreducible square on that torus, correcting its determinant on the complement if necessary. The square of BZ^2 retains full degree. Applying the preceding projective-centralizer argument to B and BZ^2, Equation (6.1) restricts to the relation prohibited by Lemma 6.2.

For \PSp_4(q) take \mathcal S to be the set whose square is irreducible on the natural four-dimensional space. It is nonempty by the torus of order q^2+1 and excludes identity. Lifting a commuting pair W\in\mathcal S, Z\notin\mathcal S gives norm-one field scalars w,z\in\bbF_{q^4}^\times. Since z^2\in\bbF_{q^2}, the norm-one condition gives z^2=\pm1. Thus Z^2=1 projectively, and v=ZW still has an irreducible square.

Choose a nonzero vector x such that x,vx span an isotropic plane L. Such an x exists in the field description of the alternating form: the condition \Tr_{\bbF_{q^4}/\bbF_q}(\kappa x(vx)^*)=0 is one homogeneous \bbF_q-linear condition on xx^*\in\bbF_{q^2}. It has a nonzero solution, and the field norm x\mapsto xx^* is surjective. Irreducibility ensures that x,vx are independent and that v^{-1}x\notin L; otherwise v would satisfy a quadratic polynomial.

Choose a regular unipotent B whose unique line-plane flag is \langle x\rangle\subset L. Its existence in every characteristic can be seen in a symplectic flag basis from the matrix

\begin{pmatrix} 1&1&0&0\\0&1&1&-1\\0&0&1&-1\\0&0&0&1 \end{pmatrix},

for the alternating form with nonzero upper anti-diagonal entries 1,1. This matrix preserves the form and has one Jordan block, also in characteristic two. Its centralizer preserves \ker(B-1)=\langle x\rangle and \ker((B-1)^2)=L. A projective centralizer is actual, since a scalar multiple of a unipotent matrix can have the same eigenvalues only when the scalar is one. The incidence test now contradicts Equation (6.3). The nonsimple group \Sp_4(2) is not needed; its simple derived group is A_6.

6.6 Small tori in exceptional groups

We have proved the obstruction for all classical simple groups. For most exceptional families we apply Lemma 6.1 to a rational maximal torus. We use the usual simply connected algebraic realization followed by its central quotient. Rational tori are obtained by Weyl-group twisting, and their orders are determinants of the Frobenius action minus one on their character lattices; see [39] and [19, Propositions 25.1–25.3]. Semisimple centralizers in a simply connected semisimple group are connected [38, Section 2.10]. The tori below and their self-centralizing property in the simple quotient occur in [36, Corollary 8.2 and Lemma 8.7]. We verify that property here by a root-lattice estimate before applying Lemma 6.1. Their orders outside type G_2 are also recorded in [13, Section 3]; the two G_2 orders follow directly from its order-three and order-six Weyl actions.

Write \Phi_j for the jth cyclotomic polynomial. Use the tori in Table 2, before passing to the central quotient. For G_2(q) choose the sign avoiding a factor 3, and for q=3 choose the smaller order 7.

GroupTorus orderWeyl action
G_2(q), q\ge3q^2\pm q+1Order 3 or 6
{}^3D_4(q),F_4(q)\Phi_{12}(q)Characteristic polynomial \Phi_{12}
{}^{\epsilon}E_6(q)\Phi_9(\epsilon q)\Phi_9, with diagram sign
E_8(q)\Phi_{30}(q)Coxeter action

Table 2: Tori used for the exceptional simple groups; \epsilon=1 denotes split E_6 and \epsilon=-1 twisted E_6.

These actions are irreducible over \bbQ. For G_2,F_4,E_8 use a Coxeter element or an appropriate power. In trialitarian D_4, let b be the central node, a an outer node, and \gamma the diagram cycle of the outer nodes. The action s_a s_b\gamma has characteristic polynomial X^4-X^2+1. For E_6, the regular order-nine Weyl element in Springer’s tables [37, Section 5.4, Table 1] has a primitive ninth-root eigenvalue. Its rational characteristic polynomial, of degree six, is therefore \Phi_9. Its negative belongs to the nontrivial diagram coset and gives the twisted case.

After passing to the central quotient, dividing by (3,q-\epsilon) in type E_6, every prime divisor of these torus orders is a primitive cyclotomic prime. Their respective lower bounds are

7,\qquad13,\qquad19,\qquad31.

Indeed a prime dividing \Phi_m(q) either has multiplicative order m for q modulo that prime, or is an exceptional prime dividing m. The displayed polynomials have no such exceptional factor except for 3 in \Phi_9(\epsilon q); when present this factor has valuation one and is exactly removed by the center. All resulting torus orders are odd and greater than one.

We next prove that every nonidentity element of each resulting torus has centralizer exactly that torus. It suffices to do so for an element t of prime order r upstairs, with r one of these primitive primes. If a root \alpha vanished on t, Frobenius invariance would make every root in its twisted Weyl orbit vanish on t. By irreducibility that orbit spans the rational character space. Choose a linearly independent subset. The lattice it generates has full rank in the weight lattice, and its index must be divisible by r, since evaluation at t is a nontrivial character of order r trivial on this sublattice.

Normalize long roots to have squared length two. Hadamard’s inequality bounds these lattice indices by

2\sqrt3,\qquad 8,\qquad 8\sqrt3,\qquad16 \tag{6.10}

in the respective rows of Table 2. The respective weight-lattice covolumes are

1/\sqrt3,\qquad1/2,\qquad1/\sqrt3,\qquad1.

The second value holds for both D_4 and F_4. Each bound is smaller than the corresponding r. Thus t is regular. Connectedness of its algebraic centralizer makes that centralizer exactly the torus.

Any nonidentity element of a torus in the simple quotient has a nontrivial prime-order power of this kind. The argument survives projective centralization: one can lift that power with order r coprime to the center, and a conjugate differing from it by a central element must have that central factor equal to one, by preservation of its order. Therefore its projective centralizer is precisely the torus in the quotient. The hypotheses on C in Lemma 6.1 are now verified.

For the numerical inequality, we use

k(\mathcal F)\le100q^l, \tag{6.11}

where l is the absolute rank. This follows, with a smaller constant, from [11, Theorem 1.1, p. 3024] for the simply connected fixed-point groups; taking a quotient cannot increase the number of conjugacy classes. The standard group order formulas [19, Tables 24.1–24.2] give

\begin{array}{c|ccccc} \mathcal F&G_2(q)&{}^3D_4(q)&F_4(q)&{}^{\epsilon}E_6(q)&E_8(q)\\ \hline |\mathcal F|>&0.7q^{14}&0.7q^{28}&q^{52}/2&q^{78}/6&q^{248}/2. \end{array}

In the two small G_2 cases the direct comparisons are

\begin{aligned} |G_2(3)|&=4245696>100\cdot3^2\cdot7^4,\\ |G_2(4)|&=251596800>100\cdot4^2\cdot13^4. \end{aligned}

For q\ge5 the chosen G_2 torus has order c\le1.24q^2, and 0.7q^{14}>100q^2(1.24q^2)^4 already at q=5, with increasing ratio thereafter. In trialitarian type c<q^4, so it is enough that 0.7q^8>100, true at q=2. For F_4,E_6,E_8 use respectively c<q^4,c<2q^6,c<2q^8; the displayed lower bounds exceed 100q^l c^4 already at q=2, and thereafter with increasing ratio. This proves the desired inequality in every row, so Lemma 6.1 completes these families.

6.7 Type E_7 and the Suzuki–Ree groups

For E_7 we transfer the torus obstruction from a suitable E_6 subgroup. In the simply connected algebraic group choose a maximal-rank subgroup M geometrically a Levi subgroup with derived group D_M=[M,M] of type E_6 and one-dimensional center. Both rational forms E_6 and {}^2E_6 can be obtained: the ambient Weyl group contains -1, which normalizes this subsystem and induces its nontrivial diagram option, so rational Weyl twisting gives the second form. Choose the sign \epsilon such that (3,q-\epsilon)=1.

Conjugation on the derived group gives a map \pi from M(q) to adjoint {}^{\epsilon}E_6(q). Its image is the simple group of that type. Indeed the simply connected derived subgroup already maps onto it: both the finite center and the Frobenius cohomology of its order-three algebraic center vanish under the chosen coprimality condition. Denote this finite simple image by \mathcal F_0, and let C_0\subset\mathcal F_0 be the torus used above. The kernel K_M=\ker\pi is central, with order dividing a product of q-\epsilon and powers of 3. It has no prime factor in common with |C_0|. Since \pi(D_M(q))=\mathcal F_0, every element of M(q) differs from an element of D_M(q) by an element of K_M. Thus

M(q)=D_M(q)K_M,\qquad M(q)/D_M(q)\simeq K_M/(K_M\cap D_M(q)).

In particular, for every primitive prime r dividing |C_0|, this quotient has order prime to r, and every element of r-power order in M(q) belongs to D_M(q).

Define \mathcal S in projective E_7(q) to be the union of the conjugates of the images of those elements of M(q) whose projection belongs to C_0\setminus\{1\}. The preimage in M of the algebraic torus containing C_0 is a maximal torus of M, and also of E_7. Thus all these elements are semisimple. The set is nonempty by surjectivity, and it excludes identity: the ambient central elements project trivially to adjoint E_6.

We need their primitive-prime powers to be regular not only in E_6 but in E_7. Such a power lies in D_M(q) by the quotient calculation just given. Every E_7 root restricts to a nonzero weight on this E_6. To check nonvanishing, the fundamental weight perpendicular to the E_6 subsystem has squared norm 3/2; a root proportional to it would have rational proportionality factor of square 4/3, impossible. The restriction has length at most \sqrt2. Its orbit under the irreducible twisted Weyl action spans the six-dimensional weight space. The same index argument as in Equation (6.10) bounds the resulting weight-lattice index by 8\sqrt3<19, smaller than the primitive prime. Hence these powers are regular in E_7 as well.

Now conjugate W\in\mathcal S into the specified torus in M(q). Every element commuting with it projectively belongs to this torus: the center of simply connected E_7 has order at most two, so the primitive-prime power is actually centralized, and its connected centralizer is the torus. In particular a commuting Z\notin\mathcal S lies in M(q) and projects to 1 in \mathcal F_0; a nonidentity projection would lie in C_0 and put Z in \mathcal S.

For each conjugate of a nonidentity element of C_0 in \mathcal F_0, choose a lift B in M(q). Both B and BZ^2 have that nonidentity projection, so the preceding regularity argument applies to each. Their projective centralizers are toral and project into the corresponding conjugate of C_0. Projecting Equation (6.1) to \mathcal F_0 therefore puts the nonidentity projection w of W in

C_0^h w^{-1}C_0^h\quad\text{for every }h\in\mathcal F_0.

The counting proof of Lemma 6.1, already verified for this E_6 group, excludes this. This proves the obstruction in E_7.

For the simple Suzuki and rank-one Ree groups, use Equation (6.2) and their doubly transitive rank-one BN-pair action. A pair stabilizer has a torus of order q-1, containing a prime-order element of order greater than three. In Suzuki type q=2^{2a+1}\ge8, and q-1 is odd and not divisible by three. In Ree type q=3^{2a+1}\ge27, the number q-1 has 2-adic valuation one and an odd factor greater than one, not divisible by three.

Such a prime-order element t is regular. On the standard Frobenius-stable pair torus, the exceptional Frobenius F acts on roots by F^*\alpha=\ell^j\alpha', where \ell is the characteristic and \alpha' is a root of the opposite length; the factor \ell^j includes the field-Frobenius part. If \alpha(t)=1, then F(t)=t gives \alpha'(t)^{\ell^j}=1. Since the order of t is prime to \ell, also \alpha'(t)=1. The two roots are nonparallel, because a reduced root system has no parallel roots of different lengths. The index of the lattice they span in the weight lattice is at most 2\sqrt2 in B_2 and at most 2 in G_2, by the same length and covolume calculation as above. Neither index can be divisible by the chosen prime. Its centralizer is therefore the pair torus, which fixes both points individually. Choose the pair to be p,vp and apply the point-pair test.

Finally consider {}^2F_4(q), q=2^{2a+1}\ge8. Let \gamma be the normalized diagram reversal in F_4. The twisted Weyl action s_1s_2\gamma has square s_1s_2s_4s_3, a Coxeter element. The resulting finite torus C is contained in the Frobenius-square torus of order \Phi_{12}(q). Its order is one of the two factors

q^2\pm\sqrt{2q^3}+q\pm\sqrt{2q}+1,

with the signs chosen together; these are Malle’s two cyclic tori, as recorded in [13, Theorem 8], and their orders multiply to \Phi_{12}(q). Equivalently, the determinant formula bounds its order between (\sqrt q-1)^4 and 4q^2. It is odd and greater than one. Every prime divisor is at least thirteen, and the F_4 root-lattice argument proves that every nonidentity element has centralizer precisely C. The standard group order gives |{}^2F_4(q)|>q^{26}/2. Also k({}^2F_4(q))\le100q^4; the sharper bound q^2+4q+17 is given in [11, Table 1, p. 3049]. Thus

|{}^2F_4(q)|>100q^4(4q^2)^4\ge k({}^2F_4(q))|C|^4 \qquad(q\ge8),

and Lemma 6.1 applies.

Completion of the proof of Lemma 5.2. The classification consists of the alternating groups, the classical and exceptional groups of Lie type, and the sporadic groups. All families have been covered above. The low-rank orthogonal groups have their usual linear, unitary, or symplectic realizations; in particular plus type l=3 is \PSL_4, and rank two symplectic type was treated separately. The exceptional small derived simple groups are G_2(2)'\simeq\PSU_3(3), {}^2G_2(3)'\simeq\PSL_2(8), and the Tits group, already included in Table 1. Every chosen \mathcal S is nonempty, proper, and conjugacy-invariant, and for it Equation (6.1) has been excluded for every commuting pair with W\in\mathcal S, Z\notin\mathcal S.

7 The remaining unitary groups

We now pass from the odd-degree division case to arbitrary outer forms of type A. The induction is on the reduced degree, simultaneously over all number fields. Thus a special unitary group of an algebra of degree m over a finite extension of k is an admissible induction input whenever m is smaller than the degree currently under consideration. Restriction of scalars does not change this convention.

Theorem 7.1. The Margulis–Platonov assertion holds for every simply connected absolutely almost simple group of outer type A over a number field.

Write L/k for a quadratic extension, D for a central simple L-algebra of degree n, and * for a unitary involution on D. Set S=\SU(D,*) and U=\U(D,*). We continue to write i\in L^\times for a fixed element with i^*=-i. By the established isotropic cases and Proposition 2.3, it suffices to assume that S is k-anisotropic and prove V_0/R=1, where R=S(k)^e is an abstract power subgroup. In this section a group element is said to be killed when its image in the finite group S(k)/R is trivial. Lemma 2.4 will be used for smaller special groups and their restrictions of scalars. Its local power criterion applies to their images in S as well.

The degree-two case is an established inner type A_1 case of Theorem 2.1. For odd division degree, Proposition 3.1 and Theorems 4.1 and 5.1 give V_0/R=1. Three arguments remain: a ternary split-algebra case, the odd matrix-algebra case, and the even-degree induction step.

7.1 Uniform local power roots

Some of the smaller subgroups below vary with the element being factored. The following observation allows their local neighborhoods to be chosen in the fixed ambient algebra before those subgroups are constructed.

Lemma 7.2. Fix a completion k_v, a finite-dimensional matrix realization of D, and an integer e\geq1. There is a neighborhood of 1 with the following property. An element in that neighborhood which belongs to one of the unitary or special unitary subgroups arising from a *-stable subalgebra of D, or from an invariant summand of its Hermitian module, has an e-th root in the same subgroup. The neighborhood can be chosen uniformly for all such subalgebras and summands of the bounded degrees occurring here.

Proof. In a sufficiently small matrix neighborhood, the convergent series (1+X)^{1/e} defines the root close to 1. A finite-dimensional local subalgebra is closed, so the series stays in every subalgebra containing X. Uniqueness of the root close to 1 gives (a^{1/e})^*=(a^*)^{1/e}=(a^{1/e})^{-1} when a^*=a^{-1}. The same series is the identity on a summand where a is the identity.

For a special group, the reduced determinant of the root has e-th power 1. All its reduced eigenvalues occur among the ambient eigenvalues, and all are close to 1 over the local algebraic closure when the ambient matrix is sufficiently close to 1. There are at most n eigenvalues in each reduced determinant. Shrinking the fixed neighborhood therefore makes all the relevant determinants lie in a neighborhood containing no e-th root of unity other than 1. This proves the special condition uniformly, including after restriction of scalars.

7.2 Ternary Hermitian forms

Proposition 7.3. If D=M_3(L), then V_0/R=1.

Proof. At every finite place a ternary Hermitian space is isotropic, so A is empty and V_0=S(k). We may assume that the global form is anisotropic. Use the convention that its pairing \langle\ ,\ \rangle is linear in the first variable. Scale the form so that a fixed vector x has norm 1, and choose e_2\perp x with norm \kappa\ne0. Let \Delta be the determinant of the full form in fixed volume coordinates.

Choose a finite set B containing the archimedean places, all places where -\Delta or -\kappa is not a local norm from L, and the finite rank-zero places of the special stabilizer of x. The first two norm conditions exclude only finitely many finite places: outside the ramification and the divisors of the constants, units are norms from an unramified quadratic extension. Enlarge B for fixed models as necessary. We shall factor a representative of a prescribed coset into three binary special transformations, all locally small at B.

For a representative u, put

z=ux,\qquad \alpha=\langle x,z\rangle,\qquad \delta=1-N_{L/k}(\alpha),\qquad k_0=2-\alpha-\bar\alpha.

We require \delta k_0(\delta-k_0)\ne0. In the nondegenerate plane spanned by x,z, there is a unique vector y_* whose pairing with each of x,z is 1; inversion of its two-by-two Gram matrix gives

\langle y_*,y_*\rangle=k_0/\delta.

Choose the vector v\perp x,z with \det(x,z,v)=1. The determinant of the Gram matrix in this basis gives \langle v,v\rangle=\Delta/\delta. Consequently a vector y=a y_*+b v has norm 1, has both marked pairings equal to a, and satisfies 1-N_{L/k}(a)=\kappa N_{L/k}(c) precisely when

t=N_{L/k}(a),\qquad \frac{\delta-k_0t}{\Delta}=N_{L/k}(b),\qquad \frac{1-t}{\kappa}=N_{L/k}(c). \tag{7.1}

We insist that a,b,c be nonzero.

We first produce local models at the places in B. Choose y=a x+c e_2 close to x, with a,c\ne0 and norm 1; the local norm map is a submersion at 1, so this is possible with a close to 1 and c small. The special isometry w_1 of the plane \langle x,y\rangle sending x to y, extended by the identity, is close to 1. Choose \rho close to 1 in the special stabilizer of y, and set

z=\rho x,\qquad w_2=\rho w_1^{-1}\rho^{-1},\qquad u_0=w_2w_1.

Then w_2y=z, u_0x=z, and \langle y,x\rangle=\langle y,z\rangle=a. We can also arrange linear independence of x,y,z and the three inequalities imposed above. Indeed the projection of x onto y^\perp is nonisotropic, and its generic image under the special stabilizer gives linear independence. The scalar inequalities are nonempty algebraic conditions: taking minus the identity on y^\perp gives \alpha=2N_{L/k}(a)-1, and a generic choice of a avoids their zeros. Local points near 1 are Zariski dense, so these nonempty algebraic openings can be met while retaining all the smallness conditions.

At these models Equation (7.1) has all three norm arguments nonzero. Since a quadratic norm map on nonzero elements is a local submersion, solutions persist for nearby u, even with t fixed. Proposition 2.3 now supplies a representative of the prescribed coset sufficiently close to these models at B. At a place outside B, choose c\ne0 small and put t=1-\kappa N_{L/k}(c). The first factor is then close to 1; the second is close to a nonzero norm because

\delta-k_0=-N_{L/k}(1-\alpha) \quad\hbox{and}\quad -\Delta\in N_{L/k}(L_v^\times).

Thus Equation (7.1) has the required local solutions everywhere, with the prescribed ones at B.

Here is the global step, including the passage from a product of norms to the three separate norms. Write

f_1(t)=t,\qquad f_2(t)=(\delta-k_0t)/\Delta,\qquad f_3(t)=(1-t)/\kappa.

Their roots 0,\delta/k_0,1 are distinct. A smooth projective model of

N_{L/k}(\xi)=f_1(t)f_2(t)f_3(t) \tag{7.2}

is a Châtelet surface. The theorem of Colliot-Thélène–Sansuc–Swinnerton-Dyer identifies the closure of its rational points with its Brauer–Manin set [8]; see also [7, Section 5.2]. For a split cubic, its Brauer group modulo constants is generated by the quaternion symbols of the quadratic extension and the linear factors [8]. The local points just constructed are orthogonal to these classes: each f_j(t) is individually a norm, so a symbol written with f_j evaluates to zero. Replacing f_j by its monic linear factor only adds a constant Brauer class, and the sum of the local invariants of that constant is zero by reciprocity. These choices give an adelic point; integral choices are available at all but finitely many places.

Enlarge the finite approximation set to contain B, the ramified places of L/k, and all divisors of the leading coefficients, nonzero roots, and pairwise root differences of the three linear factors. Apply the Châtelet theorem to approximate the chosen local points there, on the affine open where f_1f_2f_3\ne0. At a remaining nonsplit place the extension is unramified and all these nonzero constants are units. If t is integral, at most one f_j(t) has positive valuation. If t is not integral, all three f_j(t) have valuation \ord_v(t). Since their product is a norm by Equation (7.2), the nonzero valuation in the first case, or the common valuation in the second case, is even. Units are norms in an unramified quadratic extension. Thus every f_j(t) is separately a local norm at every place, including the approximated places. The quadratic Hasse norm theorem [22, Chapter VIII, Theorem 3.1] gives global a,b,c in Equation (7.1). Its norm torsors are rational conics once soluble, so weak approximation gives the prescribed approximations to a,b,c at B.

For the resulting y, both planes \langle x,y\rangle and \langle z,y\rangle have Gram determinant 1-N_{L/k}(a)=\kappa N_{L/k}(c)\ne0. Their special groups have no finite rank-zero place outside B, since -\kappa is a local norm there. In a nondegenerate binary Hermitian plane, an isometry between marked norm-one vectors has a unique special extension: extend it to the orthogonal line and adjust the determinant on that line. In local orthogonal coordinates this extension varies smoothly with the plane and marked vectors. Hence the two resulting transformations w_1,w_2 approximate the prescribed local transformations, and the remaining factor (w_2w_1)^{-1}u fixes x and is close to 1 at B. Lemma 7.2, followed by the established A_1 case and Lemma 2.4, kills all three factors. This kills the prescribed coset.

7.3 Odd matrix degree

Reduction to Hermitian dimension two is an established strategy in the unitary problem; see Tomanov [42, p. 895]. Here the induction parameter is the reduced degree over all number fields. Suppose n is odd and D=M_l(\Delta_0), where \Delta_0 is a division algebra of degree d and l>1. Then l\geq3 and n=ld. The classification of unitary involutions realizes S as the special group of a Hermitian l-space over a unitary division algebra [16, Theorem 4.2(2)]. Anisotropy implies that every subspace is nondegenerate.

The group is generated by its special transformations on two-dimensional \Delta_0-subspaces. To see this, choose a nonzero vector x and an isometry u. In a plane containing x,ux, Witt’s extension theorem gives an isometry sending x to ux. Its determinant can be adjusted on the orthogonal line in that plane. Here the unitary group of a nondegenerate \Delta_0-line maps onto L^1 by reduced determinant. At a nonsplit finite place, the existence of a unitary involution makes the Brauer corestriction of the algebra zero. For a quadratic extension of nonarchimedean local fields, corestriction preserves the local Brauer invariant, so the algebra itself is split. The line therefore becomes an ordinary Hermitian d-space, and its unitary determinant is onto by varying one orthogonal coordinate. At a nonsplit real place the extension is \bbC/\bbR, the algebra is again split, and the same argument works for every Hermitian signature. At split finite places use reduced norm surjectivity. At split real places the division degree is odd, so there is no quaternionic sign restriction. Globally, for d>1, each determinant fiber is a torsor under the simply connected special group of that line; Theorem 2.2 gives its rational point. For d=1 surjectivity is immediate. Dividing by the resulting special plane move fixes x, and repetition in its orthogonal complement proves the generation assertion.

If d>1, these plane groups have reduced degree 2d<n. They have no finite rank-zero places. At a split place this follows from their two-dimensional module over the local division algebra; at a nonsplit finite place the algebra is split and the Hermitian dimension 2d\geq6 is isotropic. The induction hypothesis therefore kills their rational points. If d=1, put each plane move inside a three-dimensional subspace and apply Proposition 7.3. This proves the odd matrix-algebra case.

7.4 A quadratic Hermitian subfield in even degree

Assume now that n=2m with m\geq2. We first construct a fixed quadratic subfield S_0\subset D, disjoint from L, on which * is the identity. The centralizer of S_0 will supply the smaller special unitary group in the induction.

Lemma 7.4. There is a quadratic field S_0=k(s)\subset D, disjoint from L, with s^*=s and s^2=r\in k^\times, such that the two geometric eigenspaces of s have dimension m.

Proof. Choose r\in N_{L/k}(L^\times) with the following local conditions. At the finitely many exceptional nonsplit places, require r to be a square. At a place split in L where the local index of D does not divide m, require r to be a nonsquare, including the corresponding real sign condition when needed. At one additional finite place split in L, require r to be a nonsquare. This last condition ensures that S_0 is a field and differs from L. The requirements are compatible: at split places the norm map is surjective, and a square can be approximated by norms at nonsplit places. Weak approximation in L, followed by the norm, supplies r.

We verify local embeddings of k_v[s]/(s^2-r) with the stated multiplicities and involution. At split places, a quadratic field extension reduces the local division index by its factor of two, whenever this is required to make the index divide m. This is exactly the local embedding criterion for a degree-two etale algebra in a central simple algebra of degree 2m. In the split quadratic case one uses two blocks of degree m. The two components over L are paired by the involution.

At a nonsplit place where S_0 splits, decompose the Hermitian space as an orthogonal sum of two m-spaces. At every other nonsplit place we may, by the choice of the exceptional set, assume that L/k is unramified and the Hermitian form is unimodular. Its determinant is a norm. If S_0 locally equals L, the form is hyperbolic and dual isotropic m-spaces give the embedding. If the two quadratic fields are distinct, use the orthogonal sum of m copies of one half the trace to L of the standard Hermitian line over LS_0/S_0. In the basis 1,s its determinant is r, a norm, so the local classification of Hermitian forms identifies this form with the given one. These facts about algebras and local Hermitian forms are the usual local classification and embedding theorems [33, 16].

Let X be the variety of such embeddings, equivalently the images of s with s^*=s, s^2=r, and the fixed geometric multiplicities. Over the algebraic closure it is a single orbit under S, with connected stabilizer

\mathrm{S}(\GL_m\times\GL_m).

The units on \overline X are constant, and, because the ambient group is simply connected, \Pic(\overline X) is the character lattice of this stabilizer, of rank one [34, Proposition 6.10, equation (6.10.1)]. The Hochschild–Serre edge map gives an injection \Br_a X\longrightarrow H^1(k,\Pic(\overline X)), where \Br_a X=\Br_1X/\Br_0X and \Br_0X=\im(\Br k\to\Br X); its kernel before taking this quotient is precisely the image of the constant classes. This map commutes with localization. Define

B(X)=\ker\!\left(\Br_a X\longrightarrow \prod_v\Br_a X_{k_v}\right).

These are the algebraic Brauer classes locally trivial modulo constants. Hence B(X) injects into \Sha^1(k,\Pic(\overline X)). This last group vanishes. Indeed a rank-one lattice has trivial or sign Galois action. The trivial case has H^1(k,\bbZ)=0; in the sign case any nonzero class factors through the quadratic sign quotient and is detected at an inert unramified place by Chebotarev. Inflation adds no classes since a continuous homomorphism from a profinite group to \bbZ is zero.

We have local points everywhere, and integral points at almost all places by Lang’s theorem [17, Theorem 1 and its corollary] and smooth lifting. Borovoi’s Hasse-principle theorem for homogeneous spaces with connected stabilizer therefore applies: its obstruction is the pairing with the locally trivial algebraic Brauer group just shown to vanish [3, Theorem 2.2]. Thus X(k)\ne\varnothing, as required.

Fix this s and put

J_0=k(j),\qquad j=is,\qquad C_s=C_D(s).

The field LS_0 is biquadratic over k, with third quadratic field J_0. The algebra C_s has degree m over LS_0, and its involution is unitary over S_0. We shall factor a representative u into a quaternion norm-one element and an element of \U(C_s).

7.5 The factorization and its local norm conditions

For u\in S, define

\begin{aligned} s'&=usu^{-1},& t&=s's^{-1},& p&=(u+sus^{-1})/2,\\ z&=(1+t)/2=up^*,& h&=zz^*=pp^*=(2+t+t^{-1})/4. \end{aligned} \tag{7.3}

These are identities in D. For example, expanding 4pp^* gives 2+usu^{-1}s^{-1}+sus^{-1}u^{-1}. We have p\in C_s, and both s and s' invert t by conjugation. Hence h commutes with both of them.

Over a splitting field, use the two s-eigenspaces to write

u=\begin{pmatrix}A&B'\\ C&D'\end{pmatrix}.

The two diagonal blocks of h have the same characteristic polynomial \Psi. On the open where the blocks are invertible, the first is

h_+=A(u^{-1})_{++} =(1-B'(D')^{-1}CA^{-1})^{-1}. \tag{7.4}

The analogous expression for the second block is conjugate to this one, since the two products of the invertible off-diagonal block maps are conjugate. The equality of characteristic polynomials then holds everywhere by polynomial continuation. Exchange of the s-labels preserves \Psi, and h=h^* preserves it under the unitary involution; thus \Psi\in k[T].

Set d_0=\Nrd_{C_s}(p^*). Then d_0\in J_0: conjugation of LS_0/S_0 takes it to \Nrd_{C_s}(p), and exchange of the two s-labels does the same, by the complementary-minor identities for u and \det u=1. Their product therefore fixes d_0, which is the condition that it belong to J_0.

We will choose u so that F=k(h) is a field of degree m and h(1-h)\ne0. When m\geq3, we also require that its normal closure have group S_m even after adjoining LS_0. Taking determinants of pp^*=h gives

N_{F/k}(h)=N_{J_0/k}(d_0). \tag{7.5}

In D, the elements

j=is,\qquad b=i\bigl(s'-(2h-1)s\bigr)

anticommute and satisfy

j^2=i^2r,\qquad b^2=4j^2h(1-h). \tag{7.6}

Indeed ss'+s's=2r(2h-1), from which both assertions follow by expansion. Since both squares are nonzero, the quaternion algebra they define over F is central simple, and its homomorphism into D is injective. Denote its image by Q. The involution acts on Q as quaternion conjugation. Moreover t=(is')j^{-1}, so z\in Q and its quaternion norm is h. Scalar extension gives LQ=C_D(F), a central simple algebra of degree two over LF. Consequently \Res_{F/k}\SL_1(Q) maps into S.

Suppose that we find a\in J_0F satisfying

N_{J_0F/F}(a)=h, \qquad N_{J_0F/J_0}(a)=d_0\quad\text{if }m\geq3. \tag{7.7}

The subfield J_0F is contained in both C_s and Q, and * acts on it as the involution over F. We obtain

u=wq,\qquad w=za^{-1}\in\SL_1(Q),\qquad q=a(p^*)^{-1}\in\U(C_s)\cap S. \tag{7.8}

The last membership follows because wq=u and w is unitary of ambient determinant one. For m\geq3, the second norm condition also gives \Nrd_{C_s}(q)=1, so q\in\SU(C_s). We now construct u,a with the local control needed to kill these factors.

Choose a finite set B containing all archimedean and fixed exceptional places, the places below the rank-zero places of \SU(C_s) over S_0, and the anisotropic finite places of S. At these places ask that u be close to 1. Additional places split in LS_0 allow us to prescribe all needed Frobenius cycle types of F. The block matrices

u=\begin{pmatrix}I&\varepsilon I\\ \varepsilon X&I+\varepsilon^2X\end{pmatrix}, \qquad h_+=I+\varepsilon^2X \tag{7.9}

have determinant one and are arbitrarily close to 1 for small \varepsilon. Taking X with any prescribed separable residue factorization gives the desired local unramified algebra for F. These are open conditions on u. Prescribing representatives of every conjugacy class of S_m at places split in LS_0 ensures that the Galois subgroup over LS_0 is S_m: a proper subgroup misses a conjugacy class, by the derangement theorem for its coset action. For m=2 a single irreducible quadratic residue condition gives the required disjointness. Include these auxiliary places in B.

Near 1, the norm equations have local solutions near 1. Start with the analytic square root a_0=h^{1/2}\in F\otimes k_v; its norm from J_0F to F is h. For m\geq3, the ratio

c_0=d_0/N_{J_0F/J_0}(a_0)

lies in J_0^1, by Equation (7.5), and is close to 1. Choose its m-th root c\in J_0^1 close to 1 and replace a_0 by ca_0. This solves both norm equations. All reduced eigenvalues involved are ambient eigenvalues of matrices near 1, so a,w,q can be made uniformly small in the sense of Lemma 7.2.

7.6 Controlling every other place

It remains to ensure local solvability of Equation (7.7) and splitting of Q away from the finitely many places at which the factors are made small. To apply Proposition 2.6, we first specify the allowed local conditions.

Let \Omega\subset S be the fixed Zariski open on which \Psi is separable and h(1-h) is invertible. For each place outside B, let \mathcal U_v be the union of S(k_v)\setminus\Omega(k_v), the locus in \Omega(k_v) on which Q is split and the required norm equations are soluble, and a sufficiently small generic identity opening I_v\subset\Omega(k_v) on which the analytic-root construction supplies norm solutions with both factors w,q local e-th powers. The preceding analytic construction makes I_v nonempty. Thus a point of I_v is allowed even when its quaternion algebra is not split.

The integral and pole tests below will give the split-Q condition for points in \Omega. Including the complement of \Omega in \mathcal U_v lets these tests meet the universal integral-point condition of Proposition 2.6 without adding a discriminant divisor to its codimension-two exclusion. We will ensure that the final rational representative lies in \Omega by one of the auxiliary local openings already prescribed. After the tests, we specify which exceptional places use the small opening I_v and which use the split-Q condition.

At integral reduction, consider the four block-determinant hypersurfaces

\det A=0,\quad\det B'=0,\quad\det C=0,\quad\det D'=0.

Exclude their pairwise intersections. If all four determinants are nonzero and m\geq3, also require that \Psi have at least one simple root over the algebraic closure of the residue field. If exactly one block determinant vanishes, require, for m\geq3, that 0 be a simple root of \Psi for a diagonal block, or 1 a simple root for an off-diagonal block. The latter roots follow respectively from the block and complementary-minor determinant identities for h and 1-h.

All excluded loci have geometric codimension at least two. This can be checked first on \GL_{2m}: the four block determinants define distinct irreducible hypersurfaces. On the open where they are all invertible, the map u\mapsto B'(D')^{-1}CA^{-1} is a submersion, as is seen by varying B' with the other three blocks fixed. The transformation M\mapsto(1-M)^{-1} in Equation (7.4) preserves eigenvalue multiplicities on this open. For m\geq3, the locus of monic degree-m polynomials with no simple root has dimension at most \lfloor m/2\rfloor in coefficient space and thus codimension at least two. The characteristic-polynomial map on matrices is flat: each fiber has dimension m^2-m, by the decomposition into finitely many Jordan types and their centralizer dimensions. Thus the same codimension bound holds for its inverse image. On each single block hypersurface the requisite simple root holds on a nonempty open, as one sees from independent two-by-two transformations between paired eigenlines, with only one of the relevant scalar blocks vanishing. Finally, scalar multiplication changes none of the zero or root conditions, so passage from \GL_{2m} to \SL_{2m} preserves these codimensions. The union is Galois stable and spreads to the chosen integral models after finitely many exceptions.

Consider first an integral place outside the fixed exceptions where J_0 is inert. Frobenius interchanges the two diagonal block divisors and also the two off-diagonal block divisors. To check this, exchange of the s-labels swaps each pair, and the unitary diagram action does the same: in adapted dual bases it is inverse transpose, and complementary minors swap the paired determinants. Exactly one of these actions occurs when the third quadratic field J_0 is inert. A rational residue point therefore cannot lie on exactly one divisor. All four determinants are nonzero. Hence h and 1-h are units in every local component of F. The quadratic algebra J_0F/F is unramified or split, so these units are norms. In particular Equation (7.6) shows that Q splits, and one can choose unit preimages of h for the first norm equation.

For m\geq3 the simple residue root of \Psi supplies an unramified local factor E/k_v of F. It need not be a degree-one factor. Write K=k_v and J=J_0\otimes_k K, an unramified quadratic field in the case under consideration. If a_0 denotes the chosen unit preimages of h, the required correction is

\eta=d_0/N_{JF/J}(a_0)\in\mathcal O_J^1,

by Equation (7.5). Hilbert 90 writes \eta=y/\bar y with y\in J^\times. Since J/K is unramified, multiplication by a power of a K-uniformizer makes y a unit without changing this quotient. The unramified etale algebra JE/J has surjective norm on units. Choose a unit x\in JE with N_{JE/J}(x)=y, and put \beta=x/x^*. Then

N_{JE/E}(\beta)=1,\qquad N_{JE/J}(\beta)=\eta.

Extend \beta by 1 on the other factors of JF and replace a_0 by a_0\beta. This corrects the determinant while preserving the norm to F, for either parity of [E:K].

If J_0 splits, then Q splits automatically. Write a=(a_+,a_-) and d_0=(d_+,d_-). Choose N_{F/K}(a_+)=d_+ and set a_-=h/a_+; compatibility gives N_{F/K}(a_-)=d_-. Thus one component must have a prescribed norm from F. When all block determinants are nonzero, the prescribed value is a unit, so an unramified factor supplies it by ordinary unit norm surjectivity. If one determinant vanishes, the prescribed simple residue root is literally 0 or 1, so Hensel’s lemma supplies a degree-one factor of F. Its norm map supplies any prescribed value, including a nonunit. This proves all the local assertions at the permitted integral reductions. When m=2, no determinant norm is being imposed, so the splitting and first-norm assertions already suffice.

We must check the single poles permitted by Proposition 2.6. Enlarge its fixed splitting field to split L,S_0,D and all the fixed data. At a single pole the place splits in this field, and

u=g_L\diag(t_{\rm p}^{ed_1},\ldots,t_{\rm p}^{ed_{2m}})g_R, \qquad d_1<\cdots<d_{2m},\quad \ord_v(t_{\rm p})>0,

with integral side factors. For m\geq3 impose total splitting of \Psi by requiring finitely many nonzero leading minors. Explicitly, if c_b is its b-th elementary coefficient, exterior-power expansion of the compression in Equation (7.4) gives

\ord_v(c_b)=e\ord_v(t_{\rm p}) \sum_{a=1}^b(d_a-d_{2m+1-a}),\qquad 1\leq b\leq m. \tag{7.10}

For completeness, the least exponent uses the first b exponent indices in the positive exterior power and the last b in its inverse. Its coefficient is the product of the corresponding opposite minors in the two rank-m projections

g_RP_+g_R^{-1},\qquad g_L^{-1}P_+g_L,

where P_+ is projection onto one s-eigenspace. All other terms have larger valuation. The indicated minors are nonzero for a generic conjugate of a rank-m projection; require them all to be units on the pole hyperplane. These are nonempty simultaneous open conditions. Their choices can be made in the staged order required by Proposition 2.6. With all other torus parameters equal to 1, the boundary of the factor with conjugator k_j has g_L=xk_j and g_R=k_j^{-1}. First choose the basic conjugators so that every right-projection minor for k_j^{-1} is nonzero, along with the basic-list dominance conditions. Then choose x in the intersection of the nonempty left-minor opens for the finitely many xk_j. All coordinate conjugates give only finitely many such dense open conditions. For an appended factor, with x already fixed, its conjugator k can be chosen in the intersection of the right-minor open and the inverse translate by x of the left-minor open. This intersection is again dense open and meets the required local approximation openings. Setting each new parameter to 1 preserves all the old boundary tests. This proves nonemptiness of every single-pole test without changing the earlier choices.

The consecutive slopes in Equation (7.10) are strictly increasing. Every Newton-polygon segment has horizontal length one, so \Psi splits completely over k_v. Since J_0 also splits here, all required norm equations are soluble and Q splits. For m=2, splitting of J_0 alone suffices.

The tests establish the required membership in \mathcal U_v at permitted integral reductions and single poles. It remains to retain global genericity and to choose the openings at the finite exceptional places. The final rational representative lies in \Omega because one of the existing auxiliary local openings is contained in \Omega(k_v). In Equation (7.9), choose X with separable characteristic polynomial and with both X and I+\varepsilon^2X invertible. Then h_+=I+\varepsilon^2X has distinct eigenvalues different from 0,1, and these conditions persist in its local opening. This argument uses the local matrix itself, not the reduction of \Psi, which can have repeated roots when \varepsilon is small. After the initial representative x is chosen, let B_1 be its finite set of denominator places outside B. At these places specifically choose the opening I_v\subset\mathcal U_v. This requires no splitting assumption; the block model in Equation (7.9) was needed only to prescribe Frobenius types at the auxiliary split places. The finitely many later model exceptions are assigned unit-parameter reductions with all four block determinants nonzero and separable \Psi; such opens are nonempty over sufficiently large residue fields, with small fields already included among the fixed exceptions, and thus use the split-Q branch as well. Consequently the small branch is used only at the controlled finite set B^+=B\cup B_1. The construction produces a representative of the required coset for which Q is split outside B^+. At every place Equation (7.7) is soluble with the prescribed near-identity solutions at B^+.

For m\geq3, the simultaneous equations form a torsor under the norm torus of Lemma 2.9, with quadratic field J_0 and degree-m field F. The full symmetric action over LS_0 implies the joint S_m\times C_2 hypothesis for F,J_0. That lemma gives a global a with the local approximations. When m=2, the quadratic Hasse norm theorem over F [22, Chapter VIII, Theorem 3.1] and weak approximation on its norm torsor give a. In either case the quaternion factor w in Equation (7.8) is killed: all its rank-zero places lie over the controlled set, where it is a local e-th power by Lemma 7.2. If m\geq3, the factor q lies in the smaller group \SU(C_s) over S_0 and is small at every rank-zero place of that fixed group. Induction and Lemma 2.4 kill q as well.

7.7 The determinant correction in degree four

It remains to treat m=2. The preceding construction has killed w and produced q\in\U(C_s)\cap S, small at the fixed set B, but its determinant in C_s may not be 1. Write

r_0=\Nrd_{C_s}(q).

Both conjugations of LS_0 over S_0 and over L invert r_0: the first by unitarity, the second by ambient determinant one. Thus r_0\in J_0^1. Taking q sufficiently close to 1 at B ensures r_0\ne-1. Put

d=(1+r_0)/2\in J_0^\times,\qquad r_0=d/\bar d,

where the bar is the nontrivial automorphism of J_0/k. The element d is close to 1 at B.

We will remove this determinant by two elements in smaller binary special groups. The following construction gives the freedom needed to keep their varying rank-zero places under control. For any finite set of places outside the fixed exceptions, one can choose a quadratic field F_i=k(f_i)\subset C_s, disjoint from LS_0, with f_i^*=f_i, such that F_i splits at these places and the binary group \SU(C_D(F_i),*) is split over both local components of F_i. Here and below B includes all fixed exceptions of the structures defined from s.

To prove the construction, let B_s be the quaternion algebra over S_0 obtained by descent from C_s: its defining semilinear involution is the composition of * and standard quaternion conjugation. These involutions commute, and B_s\otimes_{S_0}LS_0=C_s. For a trace-zero element y\in B_s, the element f=i^{-1}y satisfies f^*=f. Prescribe f^2=c\in k^\times, so y^2=i^2c. A quadratic etale algebra embeds into B_s if and only if it is a field at every ramified place of B_s, by the local embedding criterion and Brauer invariants. We may impose this by choosing i^2c nonsquare there. At a finite place of k the kernel of the square-class map to a quadratic component of S_0 has at most two elements; in the split case it has one. Thus the forbidden square classes do not exhaust the local square classes. At real places the requirement is simply a sign. These ramified places are above B. At the prescribed places outside B require c to be a square, and at one further place split completely in LS_0 require it to be a nonsquare. Weak approximation supplies c. The last condition ensures that F_i is a field disjoint from LS_0.

The embedding of S_0(\sqrt{i^2c}) into B_s can approximate any prescribed local embeddings: they are conjugate, and weak approximation in the open affine variety B_s^\times approximates the conjugators. At a specified place split in L, ordinary split block embeddings make the two binary centralizers split. At a good unramified nonsplit place where S_0 splits, decompose both two-dimensional s-blocks into orthogonal lines with unit norm values. Give each f_i-eigenspace one line from each block. Its Hermitian determinant is a unit, and hence a norm, so each binary space is hyperbolic. If S_0 does not split there, it locally equals L; the two s-blocks are dual totally isotropic spaces. Choose paired line decompositions and assign one hyperbolic plane to each f_i-eigenvalue. In each case f_i is Hermitian and traceless in C_s, and the desired local property persists on an open set of embeddings. This proves the construction.

For such a field F_i, the compositum LS_0F_i is a maximal subfield of C_s, and there is an inclusion

(J_0F_i/F_i)^1 \ \subset\ \SU(C_D(F_i),*)\cap\U(C_s). \tag{7.11}

Indeed the determinant in the binary algebra C_D(F_i) is the norm from LS_0F_i to LF_i. On J_0F_i its nontrivial automorphism exchanges the s-labels, which is the norm-one condition displayed on the left. The determinant of the same element in C_s is its norm from J_0F_i to J_0.

Choose F_1 first. Outside B, all but finitely many places have both of the following properties: d is a local norm from J_0F_1 to J_0 at every place above the given k-place, and the binary group in Equation (7.11) is isotropic at every place of F_1 above it. This follows from unramified unit norm surjectivity and good reduction. Call these the places covered by F_1. Choose F_2 by the preceding construction to split, with split binary groups in both components, at every remaining place outside B. Every such remaining place is covered by F_2, since the local norm from a split quadratic algebra is surjective.

Solve

N_{J_0F_1/J_0}(x_1)N_{J_0F_2/J_0}(x_2)=d. \tag{7.12}

This equation satisfies the Hasse principle and weak approximation on its locus where the variables are invertible. Indeed putting y_2=x_2^{-1} turns it into the nonzero locus of the nonsingular four-variable quadratic equation

N_{J_0F_1/J_0}(x_1)-dN_{J_0F_2/J_0}(y_2)=0.

Hasse–Minkowski [22, Chapter VIII, Theorem 3.5(b)] gives a rational isotropic vector whenever there are local ones. The corresponding projective quadric is rational once it has a point, and its affine cone minus the vertex has weak approximation. Removing the two norm-zero loci preserves the needed approximation to local points in this open set.

The requisite local points can be chosen with additional control. At B take x_1=\sqrt d and x_2=1, near 1; the square root is in the local J_0-algebra. Outside B, use one covering field for the entire k-place to carry the norm d, and take the other variable to be 1 at every component above that place. In particular, at any rank-zero place of one of the two binary groups, its own variable can be taken to be 1: that field cannot be the covering field there. These rank-zero places form a finite set. Use weak approximation in Equation (7.12) at their underlying places and at B, obtaining global invertible x_1,x_2 with these local approximations.

Set b_i=x_i/(x_i^*). By Equation (7.11), each b_i belongs to the indicated binary special group, of reduced degree two over F_i, and

\Nrd_{C_s}(b_1)\Nrd_{C_s}(b_2) =\frac{d}{\bar d}=r_0.

At every rank-zero place of its binary group, b_i is as close to 1 as necessary. The A_1 case, local power lifting, and Lemma 2.4 therefore kill b_1,b_2. The element (b_1b_2)^{-1}q has determinant one in C_s and remains close to 1 at B. Its special group over S_0 has degree two and all its rank-zero places lie above B, so it too is killed. Together with the already killed factor w, this kills u.

The even induction step is complete. The degree-two base, the odd-degree division result, the odd matrix argument, and this step prove V_0/R=1 in every reduced degree over every number field. Proposition 2.3 now proves Theorem 7.1.

8 Groups of type D_4

For type D_4 there are no anisotropic nonarchimedean factors. Our objective is therefore to show that every finite quotient of the rational group is trivial. The argument first kills rational noncentral involutions and then represents every power-subgroup coset by a product of two such involutions. The second step requires a maximal torus on which inversion lifts rationally, not just geometrically.

Theorem 8.1. Let k be a number field and let G be an absolutely almost simple simply connected k-group of type D_4, including the trialitarian forms. Every noncentral abstract normal subgroup of G(k) is G(k).

The isotropic case is among the established cases recalled in Section 2. We may thus assume throughout this section that G is k-anisotropic. Fix a positive integer e, put R=G(k)^e, and write q:G(k)\to\mathcal Q=G(k)/R. By Proposition 2.3, this is a finite quotient and its cosets have the approximation properties used below. It will suffice to prove that \mathcal Q=1.

8.1 Root involutions and a quadratic splitting field

We record explicitly the lattice calculations used both here and in Section 9. With roots of squared length two, the coroot lattice of the simply connected group is

Q_4=\{(x_1,x_2,x_3,x_4)\in\bbZ^4:x_1+x_2+x_3+x_4\equiv0\pmod2\}, \qquad \Phi_4=\{\pm e_i\pm e_j:i\ne j\}.

The two-torsion of a split maximal torus is Q_4/2Q_4. Its four central elements are the classes having all coordinates of the same parity. The other twelve classes are represented by the twelve pairs of opposite roots. These representatives are distinct: if two roots differ by an element of 2Q_4, their coordinate parities agree, and the defining even-sum condition then leaves only equality or opposition. The Weyl group is transitive on the roots, so all noncentral involutions form one geometric conjugacy class.

For n=\alpha^\vee(-1), the roots of C_G(n) are precisely the four orthogonal axes represented, after a Weyl conjugacy, by

\alpha=e_1-e_2,\qquad \beta_1=e_1+e_2, \qquad\beta_2=e_3-e_4,\qquad\beta_3=e_3+e_4.

The semisimple centralizer is connected, by the connected-centralizer theorem for simply connected groups [38, Section 2.10, p. 53]. The lattice spanned by these four roots has index two in Q_4, and

\alpha+\beta_1+\beta_2+\beta_3=2(e_1+e_3)\in2Q_4.

Consequently the centralizer and its simply connected covering have the geometric description

C_G(n)_{\bar k}\simeq (\SL_2^4)/\langle(-I,-I,-I,-I)\rangle. \tag{8.1}

The product of the four standard reflection representatives acts by -1 on the torus and has square one in this quotient. Every other representative of inversion has the same square: for a in the torus and an inverter x, one has (ax)^2=a\,xax^{-1}x^2=x^2.

Lemma 8.2. Every noncentral involution in G(k) is killed by q.

Proof. Let n\in G(k) be such an involution. The root pair representing n is unique, so its axis \alpha is Galois-stable. The simply connected cover of C_G(n) is therefore a product of an inner form of \SL_2 over k and restrictions of inner forms of \SL_2 over a cubic etale k-algebra E. Equivalently these factors are the norm-one groups of quaternion algebras over k and E.

There is a quadratic field L'/k whose scalar extension embeds as a maximal etale quadratic algebra in every one of these quaternion algebras. To see this, impose local conditions only at their ramified places. At a finite ramified place we require L'_v to be a field and to remain a field over each completion of E where the corresponding quaternion algebra is ramified. An odd-degree completion cannot contain L'_v. Since \dim_k E=3, at most one completion of E has degree two; thus at most one quadratic local field is excluded. There are other quadratic extensions of a nonarchimedean local field. At real ramified places choose L'_v=\bbC. Weak approximation on a defining square class, with a further nonsquare condition if necessary, realizes all these requirements. The local invariant theorem for quaternion algebras then shows that L' splits each algebra after scalar extension, which is equivalent to the asserted quadratic embedding [25, 33, 16].

The resulting maximal norm tori give a maximal torus of G. Orient the four root axes using their common quadratic field L'. Galois then acts by a common sign, together with permutations of \beta_1,\beta_2,\beta_3 fixing \alpha. In particular the two roots

\alpha,\qquad \gamma=\frac{-\alpha+\beta_1+\beta_2+\beta_3}{2}

span a Galois-stable subsystem of type A_2: both have squared length two and (\alpha,\gamma)=-1. The corresponding connected root subgroup J is defined over k and is split over L', because both roots and coroots of this subsystem are fixed over L'. The element n is the image of the rational element \alpha^\vee(-1) in the simply connected cover \widetilde J.

The group \widetilde J has no anisotropic finite places. In the inner case its degree-three central simple algebra is split by a quadratic extension, so its index divides both three and two. In the outer case the algebra over the quadratic center is split; a ternary Hermitian form over a quadratic extension of a nonarchimedean local field is isotropic. The established inner-type-A result and Theorem 7.1 now give (MP) for \widetilde J. Lemma 2.4, with an empty anisotropic-place product, makes its image under q trivial. In particular q(n)=1.

8.2 Local representatives of inversion

The next two lemmas give the local conditions imposed on a representative of an arbitrary coset of R. At a prescribed place we can choose a suitable open set freely. At the other places we will use a uniform condition on integral reduction.

Lemma 8.3. For every completion F of k there is a nonempty open set of regular semisimple elements u\in G(F) such that inversion on C_G(u) has a representative in G(F).

Proof. We first produce a noncentral involution in G(k), which can then be localized at any F. The unique geometric class of noncentral involutions is a closed semisimple orbit preserved by Galois, so it descends to a k-homogeneous space X under G. Its full geometric stabilizer is the connected semisimple centralizer in Equation (8.1). Borovoi’s theorem for a homogeneous space under a simply connected group with connected geometric stabilizer having no torus quotient requires only archimedean local points to conclude X(k)\ne\varnothing [3, Proposition 3.4(i)].

These points exist over \bbC. Over \bbR, the compact rank of every real form of D_4 is at least three, by the real orthogonal classification, including the quaternionic orthogonal form [16, 25]. A compact torus of dimension at least three has at least eight rational two-torsion points, whereas the center has order four. It therefore contains a noncentral involution. Borovoi’s theorem now supplies n\in G(k). This argument applies to all forms, including trialitarian ones; it imposes no finite-place restriction.

View n in G(F). Geometrically it is conjugate to an inversion representative by Equation (8.1) and the preceding lattice calculation. Hence the map g\mapsto gng^{-1}n takes some geometric values that are regular semisimple: on a torus inverted by n, its values include all squares. The regular locus is a nonempty Zariski open condition on g, and G(F) is Zariski dense. We may therefore choose such a g rationally. Set u=gng^{-1}n and T=C_G(u). The involution n normalizes T and sends u to u^{-1}. Its Weyl action is inversion. Indeed inversion belongs to the D_4 Weyl group; composing the two Weyl actions would fix u, whose Weyl stabilizer is trivial by connectedness of its semisimple centralizer and regularity. Finally the conjugation map G(F)\times T(F)\to G(F) is a submersion at (1,u), since no root takes the value one on u. Thus nearby regular elements have conjugate tori, and the required property holds on an open neighborhood of u.

Lemma 8.4. Outside a fixed finite set of finite places, the following assertion holds. Let u\in G(k_v) be regular semisimple and integral. If the semisimple part of its reduction lies on at most one pair of opposite root walls, then inversion on C_G(u) has a rational representative.

Proof. Write p for the residue characteristic and exclude p=2 and the fixed bad-model places. The compact closure of the cyclic group generated by u has a prime-to-p finite-order factor. Its corresponding element s reduces to the semisimple part of the reduction of u. This follows also by decomposing the finite-order part and the pro-p part of this procyclic group, whose reduction kernel is pro-p. In particular T=C_G(u) is contained in C_G(s).

The centralizer C_G(s) has an unramified reductive model with the roots specified by the reduction of s. One way to check this assertion is to pass to a finite unramified extension splitting the reduced data. A prime-to-p torsion lift is integrally conjugate to the corresponding element of a split torus: at each successive congruence level the conjugacy obstruction is cohomology of a finite cyclic group of order prime to p on a residue Lie algebra, and averaging makes this cohomology vanish. The resulting centralizer has precisely the root groups on which s has value one. Descent gives the asserted unramified model. Equivalently one may use smoothness of fixed points of an automorphism of invertible finite order together with the connected-centralizer theorem.

If there are no root walls, this centralizer is the unramified torus T. Inversion is a rational point of its Weyl-group quotient. It has a representative over the residue field by Lang’s theorem for the torus, and that representative lifts through the smooth unramified normalizer.

If there is one root pair \{\pm\alpha\}, its element n_0=\alpha^\vee(-1) is Galois-invariant, even if Galois exchanges \alpha and -\alpha. It is an integral noncentral involution central in C_G(s). Thus T\subset C_G(n_0). The latter centralizer is again unramified, and its simply connected covering is a product of restrictions of split \SL_2’s over unramified extensions: a semisimple unramified group is quasi-split, and a quasi-split group of type A_1 is split. The covering torus above T is a product of maximal tori of these \SL_2’s.

For each such torus, represent it as the norm-one group of a quadratic etale algebra. Conjugation of that algebra, acting on its underlying two-dimensional vector space, is an inverter in \GL_2 of determinant -1. Multiply all these inverters, over all factors and embeddings, by the same scalar i with i^2=-1. The resulting tuple lies in \SL_2^4 and inverts the covering torus. A Galois automorphism either preserves i or changes its sign simultaneously in all four factors. The latter discrepancy is exactly the kernel in Equation (8.1). The image of the tuple therefore descends to a k_v-rational element of C_G(n_0) inverting T. Notice that this argument permits the individual quadratic tori to be ramified.

8.3 A torus with no local-to-global obstruction

Write P_4=\Hom(Q_4,\bbZ) for the weight lattice and W=W(D_4) for its Weyl group. The following calculation explains why forcing the full Weyl group into a torus’s Galois action is sufficient.

Lemma 8.5. Let \Gamma be a subgroup of \Aut(\Phi_4) containing W, acting on P_4. Every class in H^2(\Gamma,P_4) whose restriction to every cyclic subgroup vanishes is zero. Consequently, if a maximal k-torus T of a simply connected group of type D_4 has character action containing W, then \Sha^1(k,T)=0.

Proof. Let M=P_4 and let \xi\in H^2(\Gamma,M) restrict to zero on every cyclic subgroup. The element c=-I\in W is central in \Gamma and acts by -1 on M. Apply Lemma 2.8 to an extension representing \xi. It gives a class

\beta\in H^1(\Gamma/\langle c\rangle,M/2M)

whose vanishing is equivalent to the splitting of the extension. We view a representative of this class as a cocycle on \Gamma and show that it is a coboundary.

For a simple reflection s_\alpha, cyclic triviality and the last assertion of Lemma 2.8 give a lift d_{s_\alpha}\in M of \beta(s_\alpha) with (1+s_\alpha)d_{s_\alpha}=0. Therefore

d_{s_\alpha}\in P_4\cap\mathbb Q\alpha=\mathbb Z\alpha.

The last equality follows by pairing with a neighboring simple coroot. The fundamental weights allow us to prescribe all the coefficients \langle b,\alpha^\vee\rangle modulo two independently. Adding the coboundary (1-\gamma)b for a single b\in P_4 therefore makes \beta vanish on every simple reflection, and hence on W.

Moreover,

(P_4/2P_4)^W=0. \tag{8.2}

Indeed a root is primitive in P_4; for example its pairing with an adjacent simple coroot is -1. If p is fixed modulo 2P_4 by every simple reflection, the formula p-s_\alpha p=\langle p,\alpha^\vee\rangle\alpha therefore makes every simple-coroot pairing even. Expansion in fundamental weights gives p\in2P_4. Since W is normal in \Gamma, the cocycle identity and \beta|_W=0 imply that \beta(\gamma) is W-invariant for every \gamma. Equation (8.2) gives \beta=0 on all of \Gamma. The extension consequently splits by Lemma 2.8, proving the first assertion.

For the arithmetic conclusion, take the minimal Galois splitting field of T and identify X^*(T) with P_4. The first assertion and Lemma 2.7 give \Sha^2_\omega(k,X^*(T))=0. The torus-duality conclusion of that lemma then gives \Sha^1(k,T)=0, as required.

We now construct the torus to which this lemma will apply. Fix a splitting field and a pinning of G there. At finitely many sufficiently large finite places that split completely in this field, prescribe unramified maximal tori with Frobenius in each conjugacy class of W. Such tori exist by Weyl twisting over the residue field and smooth lifting. Each has rational inversion by the no-wall argument in Lemma 8.4. Choose regular elements in them and impose small regular neighborhoods with the same local tori.

The labeling here matters. At each chosen place fix a completion embedding of the splitting field and use the fixed pinning. After a global identification of a new maximal torus with the pinned torus by inner conjugation, these local identifications differ by Weyl elements, not arbitrary diagram automorphisms. The image of the Galois group fixing the chosen splitting field thus meets every W-conjugacy class inside W. This image is all of W. Indeed a proper subgroup of a finite group cannot meet every conjugacy class: its transitive action on cosets would have no element without a fixed point, contradicting the average fixed-point count of one. The full character action \Gamma therefore contains W.

At each place, define the allowed set as the union of the elements that are not regular semisimple and the regular semisimple elements whose centralizer torus admits rational inversion. The auxiliary regular neighborhoods just chosen force the resulting rational element to be regular semisimple, hence regular semisimple at every completion. For this element, membership in the allowed sets therefore gives local rational inversion everywhere.

Apply Proposition 2.6 to any prescribed coset of R, with these auxiliary conditions and the openings from Lemma 8.3 at the other fixed exceptional places. We spell out the two uniform conditions needed for that proposition.

At integral good places, exclude the closed set where the semisimple part lies on two independent root walls. In a maximal torus these intersections have codimension at least two, as does their image under the finite quotient by W. The conjugacy-quotient map has fibers of dimension \dim G-\rank G, so its inverse image still has codimension at least two. To see the fiber dimension directly, a fiber is a union of conjugates of su, where s is fixed semisimple and u ranges over the unipotent variety of C_G(s); the latter has dimension \dim C_G(s)-\rank G. These descriptions and codimension bounds spread to the integral models after excluding finitely many places [38, Theorem 6.11, p. 64]. At every remaining integral place, Lemma 8.4 applies if the element is regular semisimple; otherwise it is in the allowed set by definition.

At a single pole, the place splits in the fixed splitting field used in Proposition 2.6. Use a split eight-dimensional vector representation. Choose the cocharacter to take distinct values on its eight weights, also after every relevant diagram translate. This requires avoidance of only finitely many hyperplanes in the cocharacter lattice. Order the exponents as d_1<\cdots<d_8. In the single-pole normal form g_L\lambda(t)^e g_R, require all initial principal minors of g_Rg_L in this order to be nonzero upon reduction. These conditions are nonempty open conditions: they hold at the identity. For each pole factor, at least one of the two disjoint complete basic parameter lists lies entirely before or after that factor. After cyclically combining the side factors as g_Rg_L, this list occurs between fixed invertible translates. Its product map is dominant, so it meets the simultaneous principal-minor open set. This argument includes poles in the first or last factor; no boundary factor needs parameters on both sides. The jth characteristic coefficient then has a unique least-valuation term, of valuation e(d_1+\cdots+d_j)\ord_v(t). The Newton polygon has eight segments of horizontal length one with distinct integral slopes. Hensel lifting therefore splits the characteristic polynomial into distinct linear factors over k_v. The centralizer torus is split: the vector representation has finite kernel, so its weights span the character space over \bbQ, on which Galois now acts trivially. Split tori have rational inversion representatives by the lattice calculation above. The finitely many extra model or denominator exceptions are treated by the local openings, as provided by Proposition 2.6.

We have proved that every coset of R has a regular semisimple representative u for which T=C_G(u) has everywhere locally rational inversion and character action containing W.

Proof of Theorem 8.1. For the torus just constructed, the fiber over inversion in N_G(T)\to N_G(T)/T is a T-torsor. It has a point over every completion, and Lemma 8.5 makes its class zero. Choose a rational representative x of inversion. The common-square calculation following Equation (8.1) gives x^2=(ux)^2=1. Neither involution is central, because each induces nontrivial inversion on the positive-dimensional torus T. Thus u=(ux)x is killed by Lemma 8.2. Every coset of R is trivial, so G(k)/G(k)^e=1. By Proposition 2.3, an arbitrary noncentral abstract normal subgroup has finite index and contains such a power subgroup. It is consequently all of G(k).

9 Groups of type E_6

The last case reduces a generic rational element to a product from a subgroup of type D_4 and the centralizer of a root involution. That centralizer has types A_1 and A_5. The geometric product decomposition alone is insufficient: we will identify its rational descent obstruction as a torsor under a simply connected semisimple group, and arrange the required local points.

Theorem 9.1. Let k be a number field and let G be an absolutely almost simple simply connected k-group of type E_6. Every noncentral abstract normal subgroup of G(k) is G(k).

Again A=\varnothing, and only the k-anisotropic case needs proof. Fix e\ge1, set R=G(k)^e, and write q:G(k)\to\mathcal Q=G(k)/R. Our goal is to kill each coset of this finite quotient.

9.1 A rational root involution

Lemma 9.2. The group G(k) contains an involution geometrically conjugate to \alpha^\vee(-1) for a root \alpha. Its centralizer H is connected semisimple of type A_1A_5, and its simply connected covering has geometric form

\pi:\SL_2\times\SL_6\longrightarrow H_{\bar k}, \qquad \ker\pi=\langle(-I_2,-I_6)\rangle. \tag{9.1}

Proof. First work geometrically. The roots centralizing \alpha^\vee(-1) are \pm\alpha and the roots perpendicular to \alpha. The latter form A_5. For example, the identity \sum_{\beta\in\Phi(E_6)}(\alpha,\beta)^2=4h^\vee=48, with h^\vee=12, shows that forty of the seventy roots other than \pm\alpha have pairing \pm1, leaving thirty perpendicular roots. The resulting rank-five subsystem is A_5. The determinant comparison \det(A_1)\det(A_5)/\det(E_6)=2\cdot6/3=4 gives index two for its coroot lattice together with \alpha in the E_6 coroot lattice. Each individual summand is saturated: the square of any nontrivial saturation index would divide two or six, respectively. The kernel is therefore the diagonal subgroup of order two, proving Equation (9.1). Connectedness again follows from the semisimple-centralizer theorem.

The geometric root-involution class is a closed semisimple orbit preserved by Galois, so it descends to a k-homogeneous space X under G. Its full geometric stabilizer is the connected semisimple group just described. The ambient group is simply connected, and the stabilizer has no torus quotient. Borovoi’s theorem therefore gives a k-point of X as soon as X has points at every archimedean place [3, Proposition 3.4(i)]. No finite-place existence assertion is needed. We verify the real places explicitly.

Over \bbR, take a real maximal torus and identify its cocharacter lattice with Q(E_6). Complex conjugation is an involution on the six-dimensional vector space Q(E_6)/2Q(E_6), so its fixed space has dimension at least three. The quadratic form

\overline x\longmapsto (x,x)/2\pmod2

on this space is nondegenerate, since \det(E_6)=3 is odd. The thirty-six root pairs give thirty-six distinct vectors of value one. Indeed if \alpha-\beta=2x, then (x,x)=1-(\alpha,\beta)/2; evenness of the root lattice permits this only for \beta=\pm\alpha. A nondegenerate quadratic form in dimension six over \bbF_2 has either twenty-eight or thirty-six vectors of value one. Ours consequently has minus type and Witt index two, with the root pairs exhausting its value-one vectors. A three-dimensional fixed subspace cannot be totally singular. Its value-one vector is a real two-torsion point in the required root-involution class.

Existence over \bbC is immediate. All the archimedean hypotheses of Borovoi’s theorem are now satisfied, giving a rational root involution n\in G(k) and completing the proof.

Fix n as in the lemma, put H=C_G(n), and denote its simply connected cover over k by \pi:\widetilde H\to H. Its almost simple factors have types A_1 and A_5, for which (MP) is now known.

9.2 The generic D_4 subgroup

Lemma 9.3. There is a nonempty k-open subset \mathcal U\subset G with the following property. For u\in\mathcal U(k), set n'=unu^{-1} and t=n'n. Then t is regular semisimple, with maximal torus T=C_G(t), and the roots of T that conjugation by n sends to their negatives generate a simply connected k-subgroup D_* of type D_4. The group D_* contains n and n' as geometrically conjugate elements, and contains t in its maximal torus T_*=D_*\cap T, on which n acts by inversion.

Proof. Work first over \bar k. Number the E_6 diagram by the chain 1,3,4,5,6, with node 2 attached to node 4, and let \delta be its diagram involution, as in Figure 1. The four roots

Figure 1: The E_6 numbering used in Equation (9.2). Reflection in the dashed axis is \delta: it exchanges 1 with 6 and 3 with 5, and fixes 2,4.

\alpha_2,\quad \alpha_4,\quad \alpha_3+\alpha_4+\alpha_5,\quad \alpha_1+\alpha_3+\alpha_4+\alpha_5+\alpha_6 \tag{9.2}

have the D_4 Gram matrix: the first has pairing -1 with each of the other three, which are mutually perpendicular. They span the full \delta-invariant sublattice of Q(E_6). Indeed successive differences give \alpha_3+\alpha_5 and \alpha_1+\alpha_6, along with \alpha_2,\alpha_4. Their lattice is thus saturated. Its squared-length-two vectors are exactly its D_4 roots, so the \delta-fixed roots form this subsystem. The associated subgroup D is simply connected, since its coroot lattice is saturated in that of G.

Let T_0 be the ambient maximal torus and S the rank-four maximal torus of D. There is no root perpendicular to S. Such a root would belong to the anti-invariant space of \delta and satisfy \delta\alpha=-\alpha, impossible because a diagram automorphism preserves positive roots. Thus a nonempty open subset S_{\mathrm{reg}} consists of elements regular in G, with centralizer T_0.

Inversion in D acts on the full root space as -1 on the \delta-invariant space and as 1 on its perpendicular complement. It therefore represents the longest Weyl element w_0=-\delta of E_6. By the D_4 calculation it has a representative of order two, which is conjugate inside D to a root involution. We may conjugate our chosen n geometrically so that it is this representative. For every s\in S, the element sn is conjugate to n inside D: choose r\in S with r^2=s and use rnr^{-1}=sn.

Consider the morphism into the G-conjugacy class of n given by

H\times S_{\mathrm{reg}}\longrightarrow \operatorname{Cl}_G(n), \qquad (h,s)\longmapsto h(sn)h^{-1}.

Its fibers have dimension two. In fact equality with the value at (h_0,s_0) implies, on multiplying by n, that a=h_0^{-1}h\in H satisfies asa^{-1}=s_0. Regularity forces a\in H\cap N_G(T_0), and a determines s. Conversely each such a preserves S=\im(1-n:T_0\to T_0), since it commutes with n; this holds for every component of H\cap N_G(T_0). It also preserves S_{\mathrm{reg}}, so it gives the corresponding input in the same fiber. The identity component of H\cap N_G(T_0) is the fixed subtorus of w_0=-\delta, of dimension two. As \dim H=3+35=38, the image has dimension

38+4-2=40=78-38=\dim\operatorname{Cl}_G(n).

It therefore contains an open subset of the class.

For every point in this image, the asserted subgroup is hDh^{-1} and its torus is hSh^{-1}: multiplication by n gives the regular element hsh^{-1}. Intrinsically, these are recovered from the roots on which n acts as minus one. This intrinsic description is Galois-invariant. The resulting property holds on a Galois-stable dense constructible subset, which contains a nonempty k-open subset. Pulling it back under u\mapsto unu^{-1} gives \mathcal U. The same intrinsic description then defines D_* and T_* over k, with all the claimed properties.

9.3 The full pullback and the factorization torsor

We next justify the rational descent of the preceding geometric factorization. It is important here to identify the entire pullback subgroup, not just its identity component.

Lemma 9.4. For u\in\mathcal U(k), let D_* be as in Lemma 9.3, and put

J=C_{D_*}(n)=D_*\cap H, \qquad \widetilde J=\pi^{-1}(J)\subset\widetilde H.

Then \widetilde J is connected semisimple simply connected. The variety

Y_u=\{(w,\widetilde q)\in D_*\times\widetilde H: w\pi(\widetilde q)=u\} \tag{9.3}

is a torsor under \widetilde J and has points over every nonarchimedean completion of k.

Proof. Over \bar k, conjugate n inside D_* to the root representative. The four rank-one factors covering J then map to \widetilde H_{\bar k}=\SL_2\times\SL_6 by

(a,b,c,d)\longmapsto\bigl(a,\diag(b,c,d)\bigr). \tag{9.4}

The distinguished root factor maps to the A_1 factor, and the three perpendicular factors map to three disjoint two-dimensional blocks of A_5. This is an injective homomorphism. The simultaneous minus one maps to (-I_2,-I_6), the full kernel of \pi, and the resulting quotient is exactly J, by Equation (8.1). Hence the image of Equation (9.4) contains the kernel of \pi and surjects onto J. It is therefore the full inverse image \pi^{-1}(J), not merely its connected component. This identifies that inverse image geometrically with \SL_2^4; descent proves that \widetilde J is connected semisimple simply connected over k.

The variety Y_u is geometrically nonempty, since n' is conjugate to n inside D_*. Indeed if wnw^{-1}=n', then w^{-1}u\in H, and this element lifts through \pi over \bar k. The right action

(w,\widetilde q)\cdot y =\bigl(w\pi(y),y^{-1}\widetilde q\bigr), \qquad y\in\widetilde J,

is simply transitive on geometric points. For two factorizations, the ratio of their D_* factors lies in D_*\cap H=J, and the ratio of their covering factors is its unique specified lift in \widetilde J. Thus Equation (9.3) is a \widetilde J-torsor. Local H^1-vanishing for simply connected semisimple groups gives its points at every nonarchimedean place [25].

To use this torsor, we must choose local factorizations that are small in the \widetilde H factor. The next elementary observation ensures that the square root used for this purpose remains in the varying torus T_*.

Fix a faithful representation of G. At any completion, sufficiently near the identity, the matrix analytic square root t\mapsto t^{1/2} is defined and commutes with conjugation. For all the tori T_* in Lemma 9.3, one can choose this neighborhood uniformly so that

t\in T_*\quad\Longrightarrow\quad t^{1/2}\in T_*. \tag{9.5}

Indeed these tori form one geometric conjugacy class of subtori, and t is regular semisimple, so its image in the fixed representation is diagonalizable. In such a diagonalization their character relations are a fixed finitely generated lattice of monomial relations, up to a permutation of the eigenvalues. The square root is defined by a convergent matrix power series and commutes with conjugation. Its eigenvalues are uniformly near one when the original matrix is near one: a bound on the matrix norm bounds the absolute values of all its eigenvalues, without any bound on a diagonalizing matrix. Every defining monomial evaluated on the root eigenvalues has square one, because t\in T_*. After shrinking a single neighborhood using the finite list of relations, each such monomial must be one, proving Equation (9.5). This argument applies also at the places above two, by choosing a smaller analytic neighborhood.

Proof of Theorem 9.1. The restriction of q\circ\pi to \widetilde H(k) is controlled by (MP) for its A_1 and A_5 factors, using Theorem 7.1 in the outer case. By Lemma 2.4, it extends to a continuous homomorphism on their finite products of anisotropic finite local groups. Choose a finite set B containing these places and all archimedean places. At each finite place in B, a sufficiently small identity neighborhood in \widetilde H(k_v) is killed by this local homomorphism.

Take any coset of R. The approximation conclusion of Proposition 2.3 gives a representative u\in\mathcal U(k) arbitrarily close to one at all places of B. Use the notation of Lemma 9.3. For v\in B, the element t=unu^{-1}n is close to one. Set w_v=t^{1/2}\in T_*(k_v), using Equation (9.5). Since n inverts T_*, we have

w_v n w_v^{-1}=w_v^2n=tn=n'.

Thus w_v^{-1}u\in H(k_v) is close to one. The central isogeny \pi is an analytic local isomorphism at one, so this element lifts to \widetilde q_v\in\widetilde H(k_v) close to one. At the finite places in B the lift can be placed in the chosen kernel neighborhoods. At the archimedean places this construction supplies the local point of Y_u that is needed for the Hasse principle.

Lemma 9.4 supplies points of Y_u at all other finite places. The Hasse principle for torsors under simply connected semisimple groups gives a rational point. After trivializing the torsor by this point, weak approximation for the same groups gives a rational point (w,\widetilde q) approximating the specified local points at B [25]. Consequently

u=w\pi(\widetilde q).

Theorem 8.1 kills w\in D_*(k) under q, since a group of type D_4 has no anisotropic finite places. The local kernel conditions and Lemma 2.4 kill \pi(\widetilde q). Thus q(u)=1. Every coset of R has been killed, so G(k)/G(k)^e=1. The finite-index conclusion of Proposition 2.3 now gives the stated assertion for every noncentral abstract normal subgroup.

9.4 Completion of the normal-subgroup theorem

Proof of Theorem 1.1. The established cases recalled in Section 2, Theorem 7.1, Theorem 8.1, and Theorem 9.1 exhaust the absolutely almost simple simply connected groups over number fields. Their proofs give, in every case, the vanishing of the finite defect for the abstract power subgroup R=G(k)^e:

R=\delta^{-1}(P_0),\qquad P_0=\overline{\delta(R)}\triangleleft\prod_{v\in A}G(k_v), \qquad P_0\ \text{open}.

For the established cases this equality follows directly from (MP); for the remaining cases it is the conclusion of the preceding arguments.

Let now N\triangleleft G(k) be any abstract normal subgroup not contained in the center. Proposition 2.3 gives [G(k):N]<\infty. Choose e to be the exponent of the finite group G(k)/N, so that R\subset N. Density of the diagonal, and openness of P_0, identify

G(k)/R\simeq \left(\prod_{v\in A}G(k_v)\right)/P_0.

The normal subgroup N/R therefore corresponds to a normal subgroup of this finite local quotient. Its full inverse image W in \prod_{v\in A}G(k_v) is open and normal, and N=\delta^{-1}(W).

If A is empty, the local product, its quotient, and W are all the one-element group. The same argument gives R=G(k) and hence N=G(k). No finite-generation or closedness hypothesis on N has entered the argument.

References

  1. [1]M. Aschbacher, The status of the classification of the finite simple groups, Notices Amer. Math. Soc. 51 (2004), no. 7, 736–740.
  2. [2]A. Borel and J. Tits, Groupes réductifs, Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. 27 (1965), 55–150.
  3. [3]M. Borovoi, The Brauer–Manin obstructions for homogeneous spaces with connected or abelian stabilizer, J. Reine Angew. Math. 473 (1996), 181–194.
  4. [4]Y. Cao and F. Xu, Strong approximation with Brauer–Manin obstruction for toric varieties, Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 68 (2018), no. 5, 1879–1908. doi:10.5802/aif.3199.
  5. [5]V. I. Chernousov, On projective simplicity of certain groups of rational points over algebraic number fields, Math. USSR-Izv. 34 (1990), no. 2, 409–423; Russian original, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Ser. Mat. 53 (1989), no. 2, 398–410. doi:10.1070/IM1990v034n02ABEH000657.
  6. [6]C. Ciobotaru, A unified proof of the Howe–Moore property, J. Lie Theory 25 (2015), no. 1, 65–89.
  7. [7]J.-L. Colliot-Thélène, L’arithmétique des variétés rationnelles, Ann. Fac. Sci. Toulouse Math. (6) 1 (1992), no. 3, 295–336.
  8. [8]J.-L. Colliot-Thélène, J.-J. Sansuc, and P. Swinnerton-Dyer, Intersections of two quadrics and Châtelet surfaces. II, J. Reine Angew. Math. 374 (1987), 72–168.
  9. [9]J. H. Conway, R. T. Curtis, S. P. Norton, R. A. Parker, and R. A. Wilson, Atlas of Finite Groups: Maximal Subgroups and Ordinary Characters for Simple Groups, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1985.
  10. [10]W. Feit and G. M. Seitz, On finite rational groups and related topics, Illinois J. Math. 33 (1989), no. 1, 103–131.
  11. [11]J. Fulman and R. Guralnick, Bounds on the number and sizes of conjugacy classes in finite Chevalley groups with applications to derangements, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 364 (2012), no. 6, 3023–3070.
  12. [12]H. Furstenberg and Y. Katznelson, An ergodic Szemerédi theorem for commuting transformations, J. Analyse Math. 34 (1978), 275–291.
  13. [13]S. Garion, M. Larsen, and A. Lubotzky, Beauville surfaces and finite simple groups, J. Reine Angew. Math. 666 (2012), 225–243.
  14. [14]P. Gille, Le problème de Kneser–Tits, Séminaire Bourbaki, 2007/2008, Exp. 983, Astérisque 326 (2009), 39–81.
  15. [15]R. E. Howe and C. C. Moore, Asymptotic properties of unitary representations, J. Funct. Anal. 32 (1979), no. 1, 72–96.
  16. [16]M.-A. Knus, A. Merkurjev, M. Rost, and J.-P. Tignol, The Book of Involutions, American Mathematical Society Colloquium Publications, vol. 44, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1998.
  17. [17]S. Lang, Algebraic groups over finite fields, Amer. J. Math. 78 (1956), 555–563.
  18. [18]R. P. Langlands, On the Functional Equations Satisfied by Eisenstein Series, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 544, Springer-Verlag, Berlin–New York, 1976.
  19. [19]G. Malle and D. Testerman, Linear Algebraic Groups and Finite Groups of Lie Type, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, vol. 133, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2011.
  20. [20]G. A. Margulis, Finiteness of quotient groups of discrete subgroups, Funct. Anal. Appl. 13 (1979), no. 3, 178–187; Russian original, Funktsional. Anal. i Prilozhen. 13 (1979), no. 3, 28–39. doi:10.1007/BF01077485.
  21. [21]G. A. Margulis, Discrete Subgroups of Semisimple Lie Groups, Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete (3), vol. 17, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1991.
  22. [22]J. S. Milne, Class Field Theory, version 4.03, August 6, 2020.
  23. [23]J. Neukirch, Algebraic Number Theory, translated from the German by N. Schappacher, Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften, vol. 322, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1999.
  24. [24]V. P. Platonov and A. S. Rapinchuk, Multiplicative structure of division algebras over number fields and the Hasse norm principle, Trudy Mat. Inst. Steklov. 165 (1984), 171–187; English translation, Proc. Steklov Inst. Math. 165 (1985), 187–205.
  25. [25]V. Platonov and A. Rapinchuk, Algebraic Groups and Number Theory, translated by R. Rowen, Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 139, Academic Press, 1994.
  26. [26]G. Prasad and A. S. Rapinchuk, Computation of the metaplectic kernel, Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. 84 (1996), 91–187.
  27. [27]G. Prasad and A. S. Rapinchuk, Developments on the congruence subgroup problem after the work of Bass, Milnor and Serre, in Collected Papers of John Milnor, vol. V, Algebra, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2010, pp. 307–325.
  28. [28]M. S. Raghunathan, On the group of norm 1 elements in a division algebra, Math. Ann. 279 (1988), 457–484. doi:10.1007/BF01456282.
  29. [29]A. S. Rapinchuk, The Margulis–Platonov conjecture for \mathrm{SL}_{1,D} and 2-generation of finite simple groups, Math. Z. 252 (2006), 295–313. doi:10.1007/s00209-005-0854-1.
  30. [30]A. S. Rapinchuk, The congruence subgroup property for S-arithmetic subgroups of simple algebraic groups when S has positive Dirichlet density, preprint, arXiv:2603.27472v1, 2026.
  31. [31]A. Rapinchuk and A. Potapchik, Normal subgroups of \mathrm{SL}_{1,D} and the classification of finite simple groups, Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. (Math. Sci.) 106 (1996), no. 4, 329–368.
  32. [32]A. S. Rapinchuk, Y. Segev, and G. M. Seitz, Finite quotients of the multiplicative group of a finite dimensional division algebra are solvable, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 15 (2002), no. 4, 929–978. doi:10.1090/S0894-0347-02-00393-4.
  33. [33]I. Reiner, Maximal Orders, corrected reprint of the 1975 original, London Mathematical Society Monographs, New Series, vol. 28, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 2003.
  34. [34]J.-J. Sansuc, Groupe de Brauer et arithmétique des groupes algébriques linéaires sur un corps de nombres, J. Reine Angew. Math. 327 (1981), 12–80.
  35. [35]Y. Segev, On finite homomorphic images of the multiplicative group of a division algebra, Ann. of Math. (2) 149 (1999), no. 1, 219–251. doi:10.2307/121024.
  36. [36]Y. Segev and G. M. Seitz, Anisotropic groups of type A_n and the commuting graph of finite simple groups, Pacific J. Math. 202 (2002), no. 1, 125–225. doi:10.2140/pjm.2002.202.125.
  37. [37]T. A. Springer, Regular elements of finite reflection groups, Invent. Math. 25 (1974), 159–198.
  38. [38]R. Steinberg, Regular elements of semi-simple algebraic groups, Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. 25 (1965), 49–80.
  39. [39]R. Steinberg, Endomorphisms of Linear Algebraic Groups, Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society, no. 80, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1968.
  40. [40]B. Sury, Congruence subgroup problem for anisotropic groups over semilocal rings, Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. (Math. Sci.) 101 (1991), no. 2, 87–110. doi:10.1007/BF02868019.
  41. [41]G. Tomanov, On the structure of algebraic groups over global fields, Math. Ann. 288 (1990), no. 3, 515–526. doi:10.1007/BF01444546.
  42. [42]G. M. Tomanov, On the reduced norm 1 group of a division algebra over a global field, Math. USSR-Izv. 39 (1992), no. 1, 895–904.
  43. [43]D. Wei, Strong approximation for a toric variety, Acta Math. Sin. (Engl. Ser.) 37 (2021), no. 1, 95–103. Preprint version: arXiv:1403.1035v3, 2019.
  44. [44]H. Weyl, Über die Gleichverteilung von Zahlen mod. Eins, Math. Ann. 77 (1916), no. 3, 313–352.
  45. [45]R. Wilson, P. Walsh, J. Tripp, I. Suleiman, R. Parker, S. Norton, S. Nickerson, S. Linton, J. Bray, and R. Abbott, ATLAS of Finite Group Representations, version 3.004, online database, accessed September 23, 2026.