Plectis Atlas
Search

↑ and ↓ move, Enter opens, Esc closes.

Reading view

An L² Einstein Gap for Nonnegatively Curved Four-Manifolds

OpenAI, 5 October 2026

PDFTeX source

Part of family 348: Nonnegative-curvature Einstein classification and an L2 topological gap. Read it with its family

This page is converted from the paper’s TeX source. Atlas reconstructs statement numbers from the paper’s typesetting source (TeX). Use the original PDF if they differ.

Abstract

We prove a universal, scale-invariant L^2 gap for the trace-free Ricci tensor on simply connected closed four-manifolds with nonnegative sectional curvature. If the trace-free Ricci energy is sufficiently small, the manifold is diffeomorphic to S^4, \CP^2, or S^2\times S^2. The proof uses the classification of positive-Einstein, nonnegatively curved four-manifolds supplied by the companion zero-plane rigidity theorem, stated explicitly as the classification premise of our result. No auxiliary curvature, volume, diameter, injectivity-radius, or Sobolev bound is required. The conclusion concerns the smooth manifold, not an isometry of the original metric.

1 Introduction

For a Riemannian four-manifold (M,g), let

E_g=\Ric_g-\frac{\Scal_g}{4}g, \qquad \mathcal D(g)=\int_M |E_g|_g^2\,d\mu_g.

The tensor E_g vanishes precisely when g is Einstein, provided that M is connected. The energy \mathcal D is unchanged by constant rescaling in dimension four. It is therefore natural to ask whether a classification of Einstein metrics remains valid at the level of smooth manifolds when \mathcal D is small. We address this question under nonnegative sectional curvature.

We take the exact Einstein classification in [11, Corollary 1.2] as the following premise.

Classification Assumption 1.1. Every connected smooth closed Riemannian four-manifold (N,h) satisfying

\Ric_h=3h,\qquad \sec_h\ge0

has universal Riemannian cover isometric to one of the following: the round S^4 of sectional curvature 1; Fubini–Study \CP^2 normalized by \Ric=3g; or S^2(1/\sqrt3)\times S^2(1/\sqrt3) with its product metric.

This premise is used only for an exactly Einstein metric; no stability statement is assumed.

Theorem 1.2. Assume Classification Assumption 1.1. There is a universal constant \varepsilon_0>0 with the following property. If (M,g) is a connected, simply connected, smooth closed Riemannian four-manifold with \sec_g\ge0 and

\int_M\left|\Ric_g-\frac{\Scal_g}{4}g\right|_g^2\,d\mu_g <\varepsilon_0,

then M is diffeomorphic, without a prescribed orientation, to the standard smooth S^4, \CP^2, or S^2\times S^2.

There are no auxiliary bounds on curvature, volume, diameter, injectivity radius, Sobolev constants, or curvature derivatives. The conclusion is about the underlying smooth manifold, rather than the original metric. This distinction matters because small L^2 error does not itself give pointwise curvature control.

Context and methods

The exact Einstein problem has been studied under several additional hypotheses. Gursky and LeBrun obtained the Fubini–Study conclusion for nonnegative sectional curvature and a nonzero positive-definite intersection form [6]. Cao and Tran established sectional-pinching criteria [1], and Liu classified the T^2-invariant case on closed simply connected four-manifolds [9]. Here the classification premise is supplied by Zero-Plane Rigidity for Einstein Four-Manifolds [11, Corollary 1.2]. Our problem is instead to transfer that exact classification to metrics with small critical Ricci error.

The relation between Ricci curvature, scalar curvature, and topology is especially strong in dimension four: the Chern–Gauss–Bonnet formula controls the Euler characteristic by the total squared curvature. The almost-Schur inequality of De Lellis and Topping [5] controls the variance of scalar curvature by the trace-free Ricci tensor under nonnegative Ricci curvature. We use its Bianchi–Bochner argument to choose a scale in which the Ricci tensor is close in L^2 to 3g.

Integral versions of Myers’ diameter argument combine second variation with control of curvature along many geodesics. The segment inequality of Cheeger and Colding [3] and the integral-curvature diameter estimates of Petersen and Sprouse [13, 15] provide the relevant context. We give the short segment-averaging argument needed here, together with an elementary derivation of the initial Sobolev inequality. These estimates prevent collapse before any smoothing is performed.

Hamilton’s Ricci flow [7] supplies the regularization. Perelman’s entropy monotonicity [12] propagates a scalar-curvature-weighted Sobolev inequality. The passage from entropy to Sobolev inequalities along Ricci flow is developed by Ye and Zhang [17, 18]; we include the form needed here, with constants that are uniform even before a common existence interval is known. Shi’s derivative estimates [14] and Hamilton’s compactness theorem [8] then turn curvature control at positive times into smooth convergence.

Smoothing from small critical curvature concentration was developed, in particular, by Chan, Chen, and Lee [2]. The formulation used here isolates a globally small high part of the curvature. Consider a sequence (M_j,g_j) satisfying the geometric hypotheses of Theorem 1.2 with \mathcal D(g_j)\to0. After normalization, nonnegative sectional curvature gives, for a fixed threshold K_0,

\norm{(|\Rm_{g_j}|-K_0)_+}_{L^2(g_j)}\longrightarrow0.

A moving threshold propagates this estimate. It yields both a uniform Sobolev inequality and noncollapse along each existing flow; a curvature-concentration contradiction then establishes a common lifespan. The same tail bound controls the evolving Einstein error. Thus the high-part formulation supplies both the regularization and the defect estimate needed for the gap argument.

A second point concerns sectional curvature. Its nonnegativity is not assumed to persist under the flow. Instead, we bound the integral of its negative part by Ct. The limit is an exactly Einstein shrinking flow, and its explicit scaling converts this weak defect estimate into nonnegative sectional curvature of the fixed Einstein metric. This gives the classification-independent compactness statement of Proposition 5.1; classification then identifies the limiting manifold.

Proof organization

Section 2 normalizes the sequence and establishes the initial geometric and Sobolev bounds. Section 3 obtains a uniform smoothing interval by controlling the high-curvature part. Section 4 propagates the Einstein error and estimates the negative sectional curvature. Section 5 constructs the compact Einstein limit, identifies its sectional curvature, and proves Theorem 1.2.

All manifolds are smooth, and closed means compact without boundary. We use R=\Scal and the curvature convention in which \Rm(X,Y,X,Y) is the sectional curvature of an orthonormal pair. The Laplacian is \Delta=\operatorname{tr}\nabla^2. Norms and integrals use the displayed metric, or the current metric along a flow, and are not volume-normalized. Constants denoted by C or c may change from line to line. Uniformity always means independence of the sequence index, after discarding finitely many terms.

2 Normalization and initial geometry

Throughout the proof let (M_j,g_j) be connected, simply connected, closed four-manifolds with

\sec_{g_j}\ge0,\qquad \norm{E_{g_j}}_2\longrightarrow0. \tag{2.1}

The aim of this section is to obtain uniform geometric bounds without assuming a curvature maximum bound. We suppress j when considering one metric in the sequence.

Proposition 2.1. After constant rescaling, the metrics in (2.1) satisfy

\frac1V\int_M R\dd=12,\qquad \norm{R-12}_2\le4\norm E_2,\qquad \norm{\Ric-3g}_2\longrightarrow0, \tag{2.2}

where V=\Vol(M,g). There are uniform positive constants v_0,V_0,D_0 such that

v_0\le V\le V_0,\qquad \diam(M,g)\le D_0. \tag{2.3}

Proof. Simple connectivity implies orientability and b_1=0. Poincaré duality therefore gives \chi(M)=2+b_2(M)\ge2. By Chern–Gauss–Bonnet,

2\le\chi(M)\le C\int_M|\Rm|^2\dd. \tag{2.4}

On the space of algebraic curvature tensors, the maximum absolute sectional curvature is a norm: sectional curvatures determine the tensor. Equivalence of norms in this finite-dimensional space, together with 0\le\sec\le R/2, gives a dimensional constant C_0 such that

|\Rm|\le C_0R. \tag{2.5}

The average scalar curvature is positive, since otherwise R\equiv0 and (2.5) contradicts (2.4). Rescale so that its average is 12. The L^2 norm of E is unchanged.

For completeness, the almost-Schur argument [5, Section 2.1] in the form needed here is as follows. Solve \Delta f=R-12. The contracted Bianchi identity says \diver E=\tfrac14dR, so integration by parts gives

\int_M(R-12)^2\dd=4\int_M\langle E,\nabla^2f\rangle\dd.

Since \Ric\ge0, the integrated Bochner formula yields \norm{\nabla^2f}_2\le\norm{\Delta f}_2. Cauchy–Schwarz proves the second assertion in (2.2). Orthogonality of the trace and trace-free parts gives

\norm{\Ric-3g}_2^2 =\norm E_2^2+\frac14\norm{R-12}_2^2\longrightarrow0. \tag{2.6}

Moreover,

\int_MR^2\dd=144V+\norm{R-12}_2^2.

Combining this identity with (2.4) and (2.5) gives V\ge v_0>0 for all sufficiently large j.

It remains to control the diameter. Write D=\diam(M,g) and choose points realizing it. Let A_1,A_2 be the balls of radius D/4 about these points. Bishop–Gromov comparison gives \Vol(A_i)\ge8^{-4}V, by comparison with the ball of radius 2D. For any nonnegative continuous function H, the segment inequality is

\int_{A_1\times A_2}\int_{\gamma_{xy}}H\,ds\,d\mu(x)d\mu(y) \le CD\bigl(\Vol(A_1)+\Vol(A_2)\bigr)\int_MH\dd, \tag{2.7}

where \gamma_{xy} is the minimizing geodesic, unique for almost every pair. This is the nonnegative-Ricci case of [3, Theorem 2.11]. To see the estimate directly, fix x and use polar coordinates y=\exp_x(r\theta) before cut time. On the half-segment r/2\le s\le r, Jacobian comparison gives

J_x(r,\theta)\le(r/s)^3J_x(s,\theta)\le8J_x(s,\theta).

Changing the order of integration bounds the integral over this half, and over y, by CD\int_MH\dd. Integrating in x\in A_1 gives its contribution to (2.7). Reverse the geodesic and fix y to treat the other half. The cut locus has measure zero.

Apply (2.7) to H=|\Ric-3g|. Some minimizing geodesic between the two balls has length \ell\ge D/2 and satisfies

\int_0^\ell H(\gamma(s))\,ds\le\delta_jD, \qquad \delta_j=CV^{-1/2}\norm{\Ric-3g}_2\longrightarrow0. \tag{2.8}

Use three parallel orthonormal normal fields along \gamma, each multiplied by \sin(\pi s/\ell), in the index form. Summing gives

\frac{3\pi^2}{2\ell} \ge\int_0^\ell\sin^2(\pi s/\ell) \Ric(\dot\gamma,\dot\gamma)\,ds \ge\frac{3\ell}{2}-\delta_jD.

Because D\le2\ell, we obtain (3/2-2\delta_j)\ell^2\le3\pi^2/2. Thus D is uniformly bounded. Bishop comparison now gives the uniform upper volume bound as well.

2.1 A support estimate and the Sobolev inequality

We will need Sobolev inequalities both initially and along the flow. The following elementary truncation lemma allows us to derive both from estimates for functions with small support.

Lemma 2.2. Let (M,g) be a closed four-manifold, a>0, and P\ge0 a smooth function. Set

\E(f)=\int_M(a|\nabla f|^2+Pf^2)\dd.

Suppose that for every Lipschitz function f, with m=\Vol\{f\ne0\}, one has

\norm f_2^2\le C m^{1/2}\E(f). \tag{2.9}

Then \norm f_4^2\le C'\E(f) for every such f, where C' depends only on C.

Proof. For k\in\mathbb Z define

m_k=\Vol\{|f|>2^k\},\qquad f_k=\min\{(|f|-2^k)_+,2^k\}.

The assumed estimate implies

2^{2k}m_{k+1}\le\norm{f_k}_2^2 \le C m_k^{1/2}\E(f_k).

The gradients of f_k occupy disjoint layers up to null sets, and \sum_k f_k^2\le C_1f^2 pointwise by a geometric series. Consequently \sum_k\E(f_k)\le C_2\E(f), with numerical constants. Put b_k=2^{4k}m_k. The preceding estimate becomes

b_{k+1}\le16C b_k^{1/2}\E(f_k).

The sum B=\sum_kb_k is finite and comparable, with numerical constants, to \int_M|f|^4\dd: integrate the geometric series \sum_{2^k<|f|}2^{4k} pointwise. Summing over k and using b_k^{1/2}\le B^{1/2} gives B\le16CC_2B^{1/2}\E(f). Division by B^{1/2} when B>0 proves the result; the case B=0 is immediate.

Proposition 2.3. The normalized metrics of Proposition 2.1 satisfy

\norm f_4^2\le S\int_M(|\nabla f|^2+f^2)\dd \tag{2.10}

for all Lipschitz functions f, with a uniform constant S.

Proof. We establish (2.9) with a=P=1. Let \bar f=V^{-1}\int_Mf\dd. Polar integration of |f(x)-f(y)| along minimizing segments yields

|f(x)-\bar f| \le\frac{CD^4}{V}\int_M\frac{|\nabla f(y)|}{d(x,y)^3}\,d\mu(y). \tag{2.11}

Indeed, on a ray from x, the coefficient of |\nabla f| at distance s is bounded using

\int_s^{\operatorname{cut}(\theta)}J_x(r,\theta)\,dr \le \frac{J_x(s,\theta)}{s^3}\int_s^D r^3\,dr \le\frac{D^4J_x(s,\theta)}{4s^3}.

This proves (2.11); absolute continuity along almost every ray justifies it for Lipschitz functions.

For any measurable set A of volume m>0, comparison with Euclidean polar measure gives

\sup_x\int_A d(x,y)^{-3}\,d\mu(y)\le C m^{1/4}.

To verify this, split the integral at radius \rho=m^{1/4}. The inner integral is at most C\rho because J_x(r,\theta)\le r^3; the outer integral is at most m\rho^{-3}. By symmetry the same bound holds with x and y interchanged. The integral operator with this kernel, restricted to A in both variables, therefore has L^2 norm at most Cm^{1/4} by the Schur estimate.

Take A=\{f\ne0\}. The gradient vanishes almost everywhere off A, and (2.3) bounds D^4/V. Taking L^2(A) norms in (2.11) gives

\norm f_2\le Cm^{1/4}\norm{\nabla f}_2+\sqrt m\,|\bar f| \le Cm^{1/4}\norm{\nabla f}_2+\frac mV\norm f_2.

If m/V\le1/2, absorb the last term and square. If m/V>1/2, then m\ge v_0/2, and (2.9) follows directly from the \int f^2 term in the energy. Lemma 2.2 completes the proof.

3 A uniform smoothing interval

Let g_j(t) be the maximal smooth unnormalized Ricci flows with the normalized initial metrics above:

\partial_tg_j=-2\Ric_{g_j},\qquad g_j(0)=g_j.

Short-time existence and the curvature continuation criterion are standard on closed manifolds [7]. Initially each flow has its own maximal time \mathcal T_j>0. Until a common lower bound for these times is proved, every estimate refers only to existing times. The scalar evolution and volume variation are

\partial_tR=\Delta R+2|\Ric|^2,\qquad \partial_td\mu=-R\,d\mu. \tag{3.1}

Thus R\ge0 and \Vol(M,g_j(t))\le V_0 throughout smooth existence. We first propagate a Sobolev inequality with a scalar-curvature weight, then use smallness of the high-curvature part to remove that weight.

3.1 Entropy supplies a weighted Sobolev inequality

Proposition 3.1. There is a uniform S_1 such that, whenever 0\le t<\min\{1,\mathcal T_j\},

\norm f_4^2\le S_1\int_M\bigl(4|\nabla f|^2+(R+1)f^2\bigr)\dd \tag{3.2}

for every Lipschitz function f on (M_j,g_j(t)).

Proof. In dimension four, Perelman’s entropy is

\begin{align*} \mu(g,\tau)=\inf_{\int f^2\dd=1}\bigg\{ &\tau\int_M(4|\nabla f|^2+Rf^2)\dd -\int_Mf^2\log f^2\dd\\ &-2\log(4\pi\tau)-4\bigg\},\end{align*}

where the infimum is over smooth positive f. Its monotonicity gives

\mu(g_j(t),\tau)\ge\mu(g_j(0),\tau+t),\qquad \tau>0 \tag{3.3}

[12, Section 3]. Here \tau+t is an entropy parameter, not a later flow time, so (3.3) imposes no additional lifespan requirement.

At time zero, Jensen’s inequality and (2.10) give

\int_Mf^2\log f^2\dd\le\log\int_Mf^4\dd \le2\log\bigl(S(y+1)\bigr),\qquad y=\int_M|\nabla f|^2\dd,

for \int f^2\dd=1. Since R\ge0,

\mu(g_j(0),\tau)\ge \inf_{y\ge0}\{4\tau y-2\log(\tau(y+1))\}-C\ge-C' \quad(0<\tau\le2).

The last bound follows by writing z=\tau(y+1): the expression in braces is 4z-2\log z-4\tau, uniformly bounded below in this range. Consequently (3.3) gives, at all times under consideration,

\int_Mf^2\log f^2\dd \le\tau\E_0(f)-2\log\tau+C, \qquad \E_0(f)=\int_M(4|\nabla f|^2+Rf^2)\dd, \tag{3.4}

whenever \norm f_2=1 and 0<\tau\le1. Approximation of |f| by positive smooth functions extends this to Lipschitz f, with 0\log0=0.

Let m=\Vol\{f\ne0\}. For a normalized f, Jensen’s inequality on its support gives \int f^2\log f^2\dd\ge\log(1/m). Choose \tau=(1+\E_0(f))^{-1} in (3.4). It follows that

\log(1/m)\le2\log(1+\E_0(f))+C.

Exponentiation, followed by homogeneity for arbitrary f, yields

\norm f_2^2\le Cm^{1/2}\left(\E_0(f)+\norm f_2^2\right).

Apply Lemma 2.2 with a=4 and P=R+1.

3.2 The high-curvature part stays small

In orthonormal frames evolving by \partial_te_i=\Ric^\sharp e_i, the curvature equation has the form

\partial_t\Rm=\Delta\Rm+\mathcal Q(\Rm),\qquad |\mathcal Q(\Rm)|\le C_q|\Rm|^2. \tag{3.5}

Here time derivatives are derivatives of the moving-frame components; the connection Laplacian has the sign fixed in Section 1. It follows that u=|\Rm| satisfies (\partial_t-\Delta)u\le C_qu^2 wherever u>0.

Choose the scalar function K by

K(0)=12C_0,\qquad K'=C_qK^2, \tag{3.6}

where C_0 is from (2.5). Fix T\in(0,1/6) so small that K is bounded on [0,T], and set

w_j(t)=\bigl(|\Rm_{g_j(t)}|-K(t)\bigr)_+.

At time zero, (2.5) implies

0\le w_j(0)\le C_0(R_{g_j}-12)_+,\qquad \norm{w_j(0)}_2\longrightarrow0. \tag{3.7}

Proposition 3.2. After discarding finitely many indices, there are uniform constants S_2,C such that, for 0\le t<\min\{T,\mathcal T_j\},

\begin{align*} \norm f_4^2&\le S_2\int_M(|\nabla f|^2+f^2)\dd, \tag{3.8}\\ \int_M w_j(t)^2\dd&\le e^{Ct}\int_M w_j(0)^2\,d\mu_{g_j}, \tag{3.9}\\ \int_M|\Rm_{g_j(t)}|^2\dd&\le C. \tag{3.10}\end{align*}

The Sobolev estimate holds for every Lipschitz function f. In particular, the supremum of \norm{w_j(t)}_2 over these existing times tends to zero.

Proof. We first work on any interval where \norm w_2\le\eta for a small fixed \eta>0. Since R\le C|\Rm|\le C(K+w), the last term in (3.2) is bounded by a fixed multiple of \int f^2 plus

C\int_Mwf^2\dd\le C\eta\norm f_4^2.

Choose \eta so that this term is absorbed into the left side. This gives (3.8) with a fixed S_2; decreasing \eta further does not change the chosen S_2.

On \{u>K\}, the equation for K removes the bounded-background reaction:

(\partial_t-\Delta)(u-K)\le C_q(u^2-K^2) =C_q(w^2+2Kw).

Integration by parts and (3.1) therefore give

\frac d{dt}\int_Mw^2\dd \le-2\int_M|\nabla w|^2\dd +2C_q\int_Mw^3\dd+4C_qK\int_Mw^2\dd. \tag{3.11}

There is no adverse volume term, since -\int Rw^2\dd\le0. The calculation is valid for the positive part: K>0, so u is smooth near \{u\ge K\}; the function (u-K)_+^2 is continuously differentiable, and Lipschitz truncation justifies integration by parts.

Hölder’s inequality and (3.8) give

\int_Mw^3\dd\le\eta\norm w_4^2 \le\eta S_2\int_M(|\nabla w|^2+w^2)\dd.

Decrease \eta so that 2C_q\eta S_2\le1. Then Y(t)=\int w^2\dd satisfies Y'\le CY as long as Y^{1/2}\le\eta. By (3.7), for large j we have Y(0)e^{CT}<\eta^2. Gronwall’s inequality and continuity exclude a first time with Y^{1/2}=\eta before \min\{T,\mathcal T_j\}. This proves (3.8) and (3.9) on the entire existing interval. Finally, u\le K+w and \Vol(M,g_j(t))\le V_0 give (3.10).

3.3 Noncollapse and the common lifespan

No common existence time has been used in this argument. We now use its two outputs, uniform Sobolev control and a vanishing curvature tail, to establish one.

Lemma 3.3. There is a uniform v_*>0 such that at every time covered by Proposition 3.2,

\Vol_{g_j(t)}B_{g_j(t)}(x,r)\ge v_*r^4 \quad\text{for all }x\in M_j,\quad 0<r\le1. \tag{3.12}

Proof. Write V_x(r)=\Vol B(x,r) on one smooth slice. Insert into (3.8) the distance cutoff that is 1 on B(x,r/2), vanishes outside B(x,r), and has gradient at most 2/r. Then

V_x(r/2)^{1/2}\le Cr^{-2}V_x(r).

For a(r)=V_x(r)/r^4, this gives a(r)\ge c\,a(r/2)^{1/2}. Iteration yields

a(r)\ge c^{2(1-2^{-k})}a(2^{-k}r)^{2^{-k}}.

For this fixed smooth metric, a(s)\to\omega_4 as s\downarrow0, where \omega_4 is the volume of the Euclidean unit ball in \R^4. Letting k\to\infty gives a(r)\ge c^2. No uniform scale for the Euclidean asymptotic is required.

Proposition 3.4. For all sufficiently large j, the flow g_j(t) exists on [0,T]. There is a uniform constant A such that

\max_{M_j}|\Rm_{g_j(t)}|\le\frac At, \qquad 0<t<T. \tag{3.13}

Proof. Fix A>2 with A/T\ge1 and A/T\ge4\max_{[0,T]}K. Suppose that t\max_Mu(t) first reaches A at an existing time t<T. Set Q=\max_Mu(t)=A/t. On [t-Q^{-1},t] the curvature is at most 2Q, because t-Q^{-1}\ge t/2 and this is a first crossing. Parabolic rescaling gives a smooth closed flow on [0,1] whose curvature norm is at most 2. Shi’s first derivative estimate [14] gives

|\nabla\Rm|(t)\le CQ^{3/2}.

This estimate requires no initial derivative or injectivity-radius bound; one may use the local formulation in [10, Theorem 3.27] with the entire closed manifold as its domain.

Let x realize the curvature maximum. Choose a fixed c\in(0,1] small enough that on B_{g_j(t)}(x,cQ^{-1/2}) the derivative estimate implies u\ge3Q/4. Since Q\ge4K(t), we have w\ge Q/2 there. Also Q\ge1, so this radius is at most 1. Lemma 3.3 now gives

\int_Mw(t)^2\dd\ge\frac{Q^2}{4}\,v_*c^4Q^{-2} =\frac{v_*c^4}{4}.

This contradicts the uniform convergence of the tail norm to zero in Proposition 3.2. Thus, for large j, no crossing occurs, and (3.13) holds throughout existing times below T.

If \mathcal T_j\le T, the same bound controls curvature on [\mathcal T_j/2,\mathcal T_j). Curvature is already bounded on the earlier compact interval by smoothness of the individual flow. The curvature continuation criterion contradicts maximality. Hence \mathcal T_j>T.

4 The Einstein and sectional-curvature defects

The common interval now permits compactness at positive times. To identify the eventual limit, we must retain information from time zero: the Einstein error tends to zero, and the integral negative sectional curvature remains of order t.

Proposition 4.1. Set \lambda(t)=3/(1-6t). Along the flows above,

\sup_{0\le t<T} \norm{\Ric_{g_j(t)}-\lambda(t)g_j(t)}_{L^2(g_j(t))} \longrightarrow0. \tag{4.1}

Proof. Write L=\Ric-\lambda g. In moving orthonormal frames, define the curvature action on a symmetric tensor B by

(\Rm(B))_{ij}=\sum_{k,l}R_{ikjl}B_{kl}; \qquad \Rm(g)=\Ric.

The Ricci evolution in these frames is

\partial_t\Ric=\Delta\Ric+2\Rm(\Ric).

The frame motion cancels the -2\Ric^2 term in the fixed-frame formula; the components of g in the moving frames are constant. Since \lambda'=2\lambda^2, subtraction yields

\partial_tL=\Delta L+2\Rm(L)+2\lambda L. \tag{4.2}

Using R\ge0, |\Rm|\le K+w, and boundedness of K and \lambda on [0,T], we obtain

\frac d{dt}\int_M|L|^2\dd \le-2\int_M|\nabla L|^2\dd +C\int_M(1+w)|L|^2\dd.

By Hölder, (3.8), and Kato’s inequality,

\int_Mw|L|^2\dd \le\norm w_2\norm{|L|}_4^2 \le S_2\norm w_2\int_M(|\nabla L|^2+|L|^2)\dd.

The coefficient tends to zero uniformly in time, by (3.9). Absorb the gradient term for large j and apply Gronwall’s inequality. The initial norm tends to zero by (2.6), proving (4.1).

We next measure failure of nonnegative sectional curvature by a scalar function of the curvature tensor. On the Euclidean space of algebraic curvature tensors on \R^4, define

F(B)=\max\left\{0, \sup_{\substack{|X|=|Y|=1\\\langle X,Y\rangle=0}} -B(X,Y,X,Y)\right\}. \tag{4.3}

Thus F(\Rm) is the magnitude of the most negative sectional curvature, or zero if all sectional curvatures are nonnegative.

Proposition 4.2. There is a uniform constant C such that

\int_{M_j}F(\Rm_{g_j(t)})\,d\mu_{g_j(t)}\le Ct, \qquad 0\le t<T. \tag{4.4}

Proof. The function F is nonnegative, convex, orthogonally invariant, and Lipschitz: it is a supremum of a bounded family of linear functionals and the zero function. Let F_\delta be its convolution with a nonnegative smooth radial mollifier supported in a ball of radius \delta in the algebraic-curvature tensor space. Then F_\delta is smooth, nonnegative, convex, and orthogonally invariant, with

|DF_\delta|\le C,\qquad |F_\delta-F|\le C\delta.

Orthogonal invariance makes this construction independent of the orthonormal frame and compatible with the metric connection.

Apply the chain rule to (3.5) in moving orthonormal frames. Convexity gives a favorable Hessian term:

\begin{align*} (\partial_t-\Delta)F_\delta(\Rm) &=DF_\delta(\Rm)[\mathcal Q(\Rm)] -\sum_aD^2F_\delta(\Rm) [\nabla_a\Rm,\nabla_a\Rm]\\ &\le C|\Rm|^2.\end{align*}

After integration, the volume variation contributes -\int R F_\delta(\Rm)\dd\le0. Closedness and (3.10) therefore imply

\int_MF_\delta(\Rm(t))\dd \le\int_MF_\delta(\Rm(0))\,d\mu_{g_j}+Ct \le C\delta V_0+Ct.

The last step uses F(\Rm(0))=0. Letting \delta\downarrow0 proves (4.4).

5 The compact Einstein limit and the gap

We first extract the geometric conclusion that does not use Classification Assumption 1.1.

Proposition 5.1. For any sequence (2.1), normalize the metrics as in Proposition 2.1 and discard finitely many terms. There are a subsequence, a connected simply connected closed smooth four-manifold N, a metric h on N, and diffeomorphisms \Phi_j:N\to M_j such that

\Ric_h=3h,\qquad \sec_h\ge0,

and

\Phi_j^*g_j(t)\longrightarrow (1-6t)h \tag{5.1}

smoothly on N\times I for every compact interval I\subset(0,T).

Proof. Fix t_*=T/2. By (3.13), the flows have uniform global curvature bounds on every compact time interval in (0,T). At t_*, the local volume lower bound (3.12) and the total volume upper bound V_0 also give a diameter bound. Indeed, points spaced a fixed distance apart along a minimizing geodesic have pairwise disjoint balls of a fixed smaller radius; each such ball has uniformly positive volume. Their number is bounded by V_0. Write the resulting bound as \diam(M_j,g_j(t_*))\le D_*.

Absolute sectional curvature bounds and the ball-volume lower bound give a uniform positive injectivity radius at t_*, by the injectivity radius estimate of Cheeger–Gromov–Taylor [4, Theorem 4.7]. Hamilton’s compactness theorem [8] now gives, after passing to a subsequence, smooth pointed convergence to a connected Ricci flow (N,h(t)) on (0,T), with h(t_*) complete. One can apply the theorem on nested compact time intervals containing t_* and take a diagonal subsequence. The curvature bounds used here are global in space; hence the complete limit version of compactness applies, without the completeness issue that can arise from purely local bounds [16, Theorem 1.1 and subsequent discussion]. The convergence maps are time-independent embeddings defined on an exhaustion of N.

We explain why the limit is compact and the embeddings are eventually diffeomorphisms. If the complete connected slice (N,h(t_*)) were noncompact, it would contain a compact closed ball \overline B(p,L) with a point q at distance L, for any L>0. Choose L>2D_*. For large j, a convergence embedding is defined on a neighborhood of this ball, and its pulled-back metric bounds lengths on the ball from below by half their h(t_*) values. Any curve in M_j joining the images of p and q must have length at least L/2: if it leaves the image of the ball, its initial portion must first reach that image’s boundary and already has this length. If it stays inside, the same bound follows by pullback. This contradicts the diameter bound. Thus N is compact. Eventually the convergence embeddings are defined on all of N; their images are open, by the inverse function theorem, and closed, by compactness. Since M_j is connected, each is a diffeomorphism. It follows also that N is simply connected.

Smooth convergence on this compact manifold and (4.1) give

\Ric_{h(t)}=\lambda(t)h(t),\qquad 0<t<T.

The Ricci-flow equation therefore integrates to

h(t)=(1-6t)h,\qquad h=\frac{1}{1-6t_*}h(t_*),\qquad \Ric_h=3h.

For each fixed t>0, (4.4) also passes to the limit. The function F is positively homogeneous of degree one. Under metric scaling by a positive constant c, its value on curvature scales by c^{-1} and the four-dimensional volume form scales by c^2. Consequently

(1-6t)\int_NF(\Rm_h)\,d\mu_h\le Ct, \qquad 0<t<T. \tag{5.2}

Let t\downarrow0. The nonnegative continuous integrand must vanish, so \sec_h\ge0. This proves the proposition.

Proof of Theorem 1.2. If no universal positive gap existed, then for every positive integer j there would be a connected simply connected closed four-manifold (M_j,g_j) with \sec_{g_j}\ge0 and \mathcal D(g_j)<1/j, whose smooth manifold is outside the three stated diffeomorphism types. Proposition 5.1 gives a subsequence diffeomorphic to a closed simply connected (N,h) with \Ric_h=3h and \sec_h\ge0. Classification Assumption 1.1 applies exactly to this metric. Since N is already simply connected, it is one of the three model manifolds, a contradiction.

Remark 5.2. Proposition 5.1 is independent of the classification input. It asserts smooth convergence only after positive-time regularization. In particular, the recovery of \sec_h\ge0 in (5.2) requires neither convergence of the original metrics at time zero nor preservation of nonnegative sectional curvature by Ricci flow.

References

  1. [1]Xiaodong Cao and Hung Tran. Einstein four-manifolds of pinched sectional curvature. Advances in Mathematics, 335:322–342, 2018. doi:10.1016/j.aim.2018.07.003.
  2. [2]Pak-Yeung Chan, Eric Chen, and Man-Chun Lee. Small curvature concentration and Ricci flow smoothing. Journal of Functional Analysis, 282(10):109420, 2022. doi:10.1016/j.jfa.2022.109420.
  3. [3]Jeff Cheeger and Tobias H. Colding. Lower bounds on Ricci curvature and the almost rigidity of warped products. Annals of Mathematics, 144(1):189–237, 1996. doi:10.2307/2118589.
  4. [4]Jeff Cheeger, Mikhail Gromov, and Michael Taylor. Finite propagation speed, kernel estimates for functions of the Laplace operator, and the geometry of complete Riemannian manifolds. Journal of Differential Geometry, 17(1):15–53, 1982. doi:10.4310/jdg/1214436699.
  5. [5]Camillo De Lellis and Peter M. Topping. Almost-Schur lemma. Calculus of Variations and Partial Differential Equations, 43(3–4):347–354, 2012. doi:10.1007/s00526-011-0413-z.
  6. [6]Matthew J. Gursky and Claude LeBrun. On Einstein manifolds of positive sectional curvature. Annals of Global Analysis and Geometry, 17(4):315–328, 1999. doi:10.1023/A:1006597912184.
  7. [7]Richard S. Hamilton. Three-manifolds with positive Ricci curvature. Journal of Differential Geometry, 17(2):255–306, 1982. doi:10.4310/jdg/1214436922.
  8. [8]Richard S. Hamilton. A compactness property for solutions of the Ricci flow. American Journal of Mathematics, 117(3):545–572, 1995. doi:10.2307/2375080.
  9. [9]Tianyue Liu. Toric Einstein 4-manifolds with non-negative sectional curvature. Annals of Global Analysis and Geometry, 67:14, 2025. doi:10.1007/s10455-025-09990-3.
  10. [10]John Morgan and Gang Tian. Ricci Flow and the Poincaré Conjecture. Clay Mathematics Monographs 3, American Mathematical Society and Clay Mathematics Institute, 2007. https://www.claymath.org/library/monographs/cmim03.pdf.
  11. [11]OpenAI. Zero-Plane Rigidity for Einstein Four-Manifolds. OpenAI Math Release preprint PDF, 2026. Reading view on this site: Zero-Plane Rigidity for Einstein Four-Manifolds.
  12. [12]Grisha Perelman. The entropy formula for the Ricci flow and its geometric applications. 2002. arXiv:math/0211159. arXiv:math/0211159, https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0211159.
  13. [13]Peter Petersen and Chadwick Sprouse. Integral curvature bounds, distance estimates and applications. Journal of Differential Geometry, 50(2):269–298, 1998. doi:10.4310/jdg/1214461171.
  14. [14]Wan-Xiong Shi. Deforming the metric on complete Riemannian manifolds. Journal of Differential Geometry, 30(1):223–301, 1989. doi:10.4310/jdg/1214443292.
  15. [15]Chadwick Sprouse. Integral curvature bounds and bounded diameter. Communications in Analysis and Geometry, 8(3):531–543, 2000. doi:10.4310/CAG.2000.v8.n3.a4.
  16. [16]Peter M. Topping. Remarks on Hamilton’s compactness theorem for Ricci flow. Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik, 692:173–191, 2014. doi:10.1515/crelle-2012-0079.
  17. [17]Rugang Ye. The logarithmic Sobolev and Sobolev inequalities along the Ricci flow. Communications in Mathematics and Statistics, 3:1–36, 2015. Author version: arXiv:0707.2424v4. doi:10.1007/s40304-015-0046-1.
  18. [18]Qi S. Zhang. A uniform Sobolev inequality under Ricci flow. International Mathematics Research Notices, 2007:rnm056, 2007. Revised author version: arXiv:0706.1594v4. doi:10.1093/imrn/rnm056.