Plectis Atlas
Search

↑ and ↓ move, Enter opens, Esc closes.

Reading view

A smooth three-torus diffeomorphism with simple Lebesgue spectrum

OpenAI, 23 September 2026

PDFTeX source

Part of family 144: Banach’s simple Lebesgue-spectrum problem. Read it with its family

This page is converted from the paper’s TeX source. Atlas reconstructs statement numbers from the paper’s typesetting source (TeX). Use the original PDF if they differ.

Abstract

We solve the probability-preserving form of Banach’s simple Lebesgue-spectrum problem in smooth dynamics. We construct a C^\infty diffeomorphism of the three-torus that preserves standard volume and whose Koopman operator has simple Lebesgue spectrum on the entire mean-zero L^2 space.

1 Introduction

Let \T=\R/\Z, let \mu be normalized Lebesgue measure on \T^3, and put \ee(t)=\exp(2\pi i t). For an invertible measure-preserving transformation T, we use the convention U_Tg=g\circ T. The closed subspace of complex square-integrable functions of integral zero is denoted by L^2_0(\T^3,\mu).

On a probability space the constants form an invariant subspace, so the probability-preserving form of Banach’s simple Lebesgue-spectrum problem asks for an invertible transformation whose Koopman operator on the entire orthogonal complement of the constants is unitarily equivalent to multiplication by w on L^2(S^1,m), where m is normalized Haar measure. Equivalently, that restriction has a bilateral orthonormal orbit which is complete. We realize this spectral model with the standard smooth volume on a compact manifold.

Theorem 1.1. There exist a C^\infty volume-preserving diffeomorphism T\colon\T^3\to\T^3 and a real function f\in L^2_0(\T^3,\mu) such that

\{f\circ T^n:n\in\Z\}

is an orthonormal basis of L^2_0(\T^3,\mu). Consequently T is ergodic, and U_T on this space is unitarily equivalent to multiplication by the coordinate w on L^2(S^1,m).

The invariant measure in Theorem 1.1 is the standard smooth volume itself. The generator f is only required to belong to L^2. In particular, the assertion concerns the whole mean-zero space, including both its spectral type and its multiplicity. Section 6 derives mixing, zero entropy, and vanishing Lyapunov exponents. Mixing of every order uses, in addition, the separate multiple-mixing theorem of [11].

The formulation above is distinct from the historical real-line question recorded by Ulam and attributed to Banach [15, §6, p. 76]. Rokhlin asked for ergodic automorphisms with simple, or at least finite-multiplicity, Lebesgue spectrum [13, §4, no. 7, p. 107]. Helson and Parry constructed cocycles over aperiodic probability-preserving transformations whose associated unitary operators have Lebesgue spectrum [7, p. 196, Theorem (a)]. Mathew and Nadkarni constructed a probability-preserving transformation with a Lebesgue component of multiplicity two [10]. Guenais connected the Morse-cocycle question with flat polynomials and constructed a countable abelian group action with simple spectrum of mixed discrete and Haar type [6]. These results distinguish a Lebesgue component, or a related group action, from one bilateral Lebesgue orbit spanning the whole centered space.

Simple spectrum in smooth dynamics was already achieved by Fayad, who constructed C^\infty volume-preserving torus diffeomorphisms with simple spectrum [5]; that result did not assert Lebesgue spectral type. In another setting, an infinite-measure conservative transformation with simple Lebesgue spectrum is presented in [3, Theorem 2.2]; the probability-space conclusion does not follow from it. Theorem 1.1 gives that conclusion for the full mean-zero space of a smooth probability-preserving map.

Related existence results in continuous time have different spectral consequences. Prikhod’ko constructs a finite-measure flow with simple Lebesgue spectrum [12, Theorem 3]. In the smooth category, Fayad, Forni and Kanigowski obtain a real analytic conservative flow on \T^2 with one singularity and countably infinite Lebesgue multiplicity [4, Theorem 1]; Abdedou, Fayad and Kessi obtain real analytic reparametrizations of minimal translation flows on \T^5 with the same multiplicity [1, Theorem 1.1]. Taking a nonzero time map of a simple Lebesgue flow yields countably infinite multiplicity: its spectral model is multiplication by \ee(t\xi) on L^2(\R,\dd\xi), and the substitution \xi=(x+k)/|t|, with x\in[0,1) and k\in\Z, gives one Lebesgue copy for each k. Thus these continuous-time results do not supply Theorem 1.1.

Successive smooth changes of coordinates have a substantial history in smooth dynamics, including the approximation-by-conjugacy constructions of Anosov and Katok [2]. We use explicit volume-preserving passages between integrable twists rather than an external conjugacy theorem. Their quantitative spectral-density transport, and the finite Fourier signals built on it, are proved below.

The construction

The approximating maps are integrable twists. In a volume-preserving coordinate system on the torus, they have the form

S(\theta,u,a)=(\theta+\phi(u),u,a),

where \phi is a smooth real circle function that is strictly increasing on an arc whose complement can be made arbitrarily short. A finite angular Fourier expansion supported on that arc has an explicit absolutely continuous spectral measure. We refer to its individual harmonics as packets, and keep a finite label, or color, on disjoint groups of packets. The colors carry the coefficients of an observable that we want to approximate by translates of a single vector.

There are three steps. A slow passage in the coordinate u replaces the twist by an arbitrarily close twist whose angular coordinate is the old u. Stationary phase locates the new angular indices and determines the spectral density at a much finer scale. The spare coordinate a supplies a small adjustable variation in the speed (the jitter). A large integer added to the lift of \phi separates the angular indices of different packets without changing the old map. This separation is what allows later perturbations to distinguish colors even when their temporal spectra overlap.

Next, a positive Fourier construction and a finite prime sieve produce a small sinusoidal bias in each color density. Its coefficient depends on the normalized angular index. A neutral passage between successive biased passages makes residue classes carry equal shares of each color. The bias strength can be chosen before the angular scale grows; the passage parameter is then free to enforce any required smooth or spectral accuracy.

Finally, many small biases are grouped into blocks. If color r has spectral density p_r and target coefficient b_r, the center at a temporal frequency z is the density-weighted mean

p(z)=\sum_r p_r(z),\qquad \beta(z)=\frac{\sum_r b_rp_r(z)}{p(z)}\quad(p(z)>0).

Centering each block at a smooth approximation to this current mean makes the loss in \int\sqrt p quadratic in the block’s strength budget, while the same block provides an estimator of the color label. Repetition makes prediction arbitrarily accurate with arbitrarily little loss in \int\sqrt p. This separation of the two estimates is the central finite construction. When the vector’s norm is close to one, keeping \int\sqrt p close to one makes whitening a small change in physical L^2, while restoring the spectral density exactly to one. A diagonal limit preserves the orthonormal orbit and makes its span contain every member of a dense family of observables.

Order of the proof

Section 2 proves the analytic passage rules, including the comparison of jitter laws along a rapidly oscillating phase. Section 3 constructs the positive laws that transmit the small biases. Section 4 proves the finite prediction result, and Section 5 prepares arbitrary observables and takes the smooth limit. Section 6 derives the dynamical consequences. Every passage acts on finite data. Its integer parameter is chosen last, after the current coordinate chart, cutoffs, jitter, and all desired error bounds have been fixed. No uniform bound on the number of packets or on the derivatives of successive coordinate charts is assumed.

2 Smooth passages and spectral densities

A volume-preserving coordinate system, also called a chart below, means a smooth volume-preserving identification of the physical torus with \T^3. All coordinate systems in the construction preserve normalized volume. An intermediate transformation has the form

S(\theta,u,a)=(\theta+\phi(u),u,a), \qquad (\theta,u,a)\in\T^3, \tag{2.1}

where \phi\in C^\infty(\T;\R) has \phi'>0 on an open arc I. We call I a good arc. Derivatives on an arc are understood in an increasing real lift of that arc.

A packet is a function A(u,a)\ee(m\theta), where m\in\Z\setminus\{0\} and A is smooth with compact support in I\times\T. A finite packet list is disjoint if, for any two entries with the same m, their coefficient supports are disjoint. Entries with different m need no support restriction. Packets may be grouped into colors; we write F_r for the sum of color r. Disjointness implies

\langle U_S^n F_r,U_S^k F_l\rangle=0 \quad(r\ne l,\ n,k\in\Z). \tag{2.2}

Indeed U_S^n(A\ee(m\theta))=\ee(nm\phi(u))A\ee(m\theta), and either angular orthogonality or disjoint coefficient supports applies. The spectral measure of one packet is

(m\phi\bmod1)_*\bigl(|A(u,a)|^2\dd u\dd a\bigr). \tag{2.3}

It has a smooth density because its coefficient support is compactly inside the good arc. We use the inner product linear in its first variable, so a vector of density p has \langle U_S^nF,F\rangle=\int_\T\ee(nz)p(z)\dd z. A measurable spectral multiplier v(z) acts on its coefficient by multiplication by v(m\phi(u)\bmod1), whenever the result belongs to L^2. These statements follow directly from the displayed formula for U_S^n, first for trigonometric polynomials and then by L^2 approximation. The pushforward formula, absolute continuity, and multiplier rule also apply to nonsmooth coefficients in L^2 supported in the good arc; their densities need not be smooth.

For later comparisons, if two vectors have spectral densities p_F,p_G for the same transformation, then

\|p_F-p_G\|_1 \le (\|F\|_2+\|G\|_2)\|F-G\|_2. \tag{2.4}

To see this, test their spectral measures against an arbitrary function of absolute value at most one and use the contraction property of its spectral multiplier. The total variation norm here and below is the L^1 norm of densities, without a factor 1/2.

Lemma 2.1 (Passage). Fix (2.1), its physical volume-preserving coordinate chart, and a finite disjoint packet list. Choose a positive integer c so large that the compact ranges m(c+\phi(\T)), for the distinct old indices m, are pairwise disjoint and avoid zero. Set V=c+\phi. Fix J\in C^\infty(\T;\R) with J'>0 on an open arc I' and fix 0\le\psi\le1 in C_c^\infty(I'). For integers N\to\infty, choose \Delta_N so that

|\Delta_N|\le N^{-1},\qquad k_N:=N\left(\int_\T V(u)\dd u+\Delta_N\right)\in\Z, \qquad H_N'=N(V+\Delta_N). \tag{2.5}

Put \sigma_N(a)=N^{-1}+N^{-2}J(a). Then

T_N(\theta,u,a)= \bigl(\theta+H_N(u+\sigma_N(a))-H_N(u),\, u+\sigma_N(a),\,a\bigr) \tag{2.6}

is a volume-preserving smooth torus diffeomorphism, and both T_N and T_N^{-1} converge smoothly to S and S^{-1}, also in the fixed physical coordinates. In the new coordinates

(\theta',u',a')=C_N(\theta,u,a) =(u,a,\theta-H_N(u)), \tag{2.7}

it is the twist of speed \sigma_N and good arc I'.

Here are its packet and density properties. For an old packet indexed by \alpha, with index m_\alpha and amplitude A_\alpha, define

E_\alpha=\{(m_\alpha V(u),a):(u,a)\in\supp A_\alpha\}. \tag{2.8}

One may choose pairwise disjoint, arbitrarily small fixed neighborhoods of these compact sets, and smooth cutoffs \chi_\alpha(s,a) supported in those neighborhoods and equal to one near E_\alpha. Retain the finitely many new packets

\begin{align*} G_{\alpha,j}(\theta',u',a') &=\ee(j\theta')\ee(m_\alpha a') \psi(u')\chi_\alpha(j/N,u')C_{\alpha,j}(u'), \tag{2.9}\\ C_{\alpha,j}(a) &=\int_\T A_\alpha(u,a)\ee(m_\alpha H_N(u)-ju)\dd u. \tag{2.10}\end{align*}

All their angular indices are nonzero for sufficiently large N. For each \alpha,

\left\|\sum_jG_{\alpha,j}\circ C_N -\psi(a)A_\alpha(u,a)\ee(m_\alpha\theta)\right\|_2=o(1). \tag{2.11}

They are disjoint as packets, and their moduli are independent of the new spare coordinate a'. Every constant attached to an old packet is preserved by this linear transport and these cutoffs.

For a single old packet write, with zero extension outside its branch,

W(s,a)=\frac{|A(u,a)|^2}{|m\phi'(u)|},\qquad s=mV(u). \tag{2.12}

Let K(s,y) be the density of the pushforward of W(s,a)\psi(a)^2\dd a under a\mapsto sJ(a). It is continuous and compactly supported in (s,y), with its s support away from zero. For any fixed positive integer P and residue h\pmod P, the unfolded temporal density of the retained packets with j\equiv h\pmod P differs in L^1(\R) by o(1) from

Q_{N,h}(t)=\sum_{k\in\Z}K(t,Nt-h-kP). \tag{2.13}

Consequently their density on \T differs in L^1(\T) by o(1) from \sum_{l\in\Z}Q_{N,h}(z+l). The assertions hold after summing over any of the finitely many colors. All o(1) terms refer to the old data, c,J,\psi,P, and support neighborhoods fixed before N tends to infinity. In particular, N may be required to exceed any prescribed bound.

Proof. Geometry and smooth convergence. Choose k_N by rounding N\int V to an integer and integrate (2.5). Then H_N(u+1)-H_N(u)=k_N, so the map u\mapsto H_N(u)\bmod1 is globally defined. The map C_N is a smooth torus diffeomorphism of Jacobian one, with inverse (\theta',u',a')\mapsto(a'+H_N(\theta'),\theta',u'). Direct substitution gives

C_NT_NC_N^{-1}(\theta',u',a') =(\theta'+\sigma_N(u'),u',a').

This proves the global assertions, except convergence. The integral identity

H_N(u+\sigma_N(a))-H_N(u) =N\int_0^{\sigma_N(a)}(V(u+t)+\Delta_N)\dd t =V(u)+O_{C^k}(N^{-1})

holds for each fixed k, with constants depending on the fixed c,J and \phi. Since c is an integer, addition of V and of \phi agree on \T. The inverse of (2.6) is

(\theta,u,a)\longmapsto (\theta-H_N(u)+H_N(u-\sigma_N(a)),u-\sigma_N(a),a),

and the same estimate proves inverse convergence. Composing with a fixed physical chart and its inverse preserves convergence in every fixed smooth norm. No bound uniform over future coordinate charts is being asserted.

Fourier coefficients. Work on a compact subarc of I containing all old coefficient supports in its interior. For s=j/N the phase in (2.10), divided by N, has critical equation

m(V(u)+\Delta_N)=s \tag{2.14}

and second derivative m\phi'(u). It has at most one critical point on this arc. With u_*=u_*(s-m\Delta_N) on that branch, set

L_{m,j}(a)= \frac{A(u_*,a)}{\sqrt{N|m\phi'(u_*)|}} \ee\left(mH_N(u_*)-ju_*+\frac{\operatorname{sgn}(m)}8\right),

and set this to zero wherever the amplitude at the critical point is zero or there is no point on the branch. Uniformly for j/N in any fixed compact interval and a\in\T,

C_{m,j}(a)-L_{m,j}(a)=o(N^{-1/2}). \tag{2.15}

For general stationary-phase background see [8]; we give the compact-support one-dimensional argument needed here. Enlarge the support arc twice inside I. Critical points near the original support then range over a fixed compact interval on which the absolute second derivative is bounded below. A smooth change of variable, depending smoothly on the critical point, reduces the divided phase to its critical value plus \operatorname{sgn}(m)y^2/2; its Jacobian at zero is |m\phi'(u_*)|^{-1/2}. After putting v=\sqrt N y, the integral on |v|\le D converges uniformly to the constant amplitude times the quadratic exponential integral there. The remaining local tails are O(N^{-1/2}/D), uniformly in the parameters, by integrating against \ee(\operatorname{sgn}(m)v^2/2): the rescaled amplitudes have uniformly bounded suprema and total variation. The part away from the critical point is O(N^{-1}) by integration by parts. Finally

\lim_{D\to\infty}\int_{-D}^D\ee(\pm v^2/2)\dd v =\exp(\pm i\pi/4);

this follows by inserting a Gaussian factor, evaluating the Gaussian integral, and removing the factor using the same tail bound. Taking first N\to\infty, then D\to\infty, proves (2.15). When the potential critical point is outside the enlarged support interval, the integral is uniformly nonstationary. This also covers zero amplitudes and the ends of the branch.

There are O(N) indices in a fixed bounded j/N range. Outside a sufficiently large such range, repeated integration by parts gives, for any fixed positive integer q, |C_{m,j}(a)|\le C_q|j|^{-q} uniformly in a and N. Indeed the phase derivative has size comparable to |j|, and its higher derivatives are O(N) with N=O(|j|) there. Thus (2.15) implies

\sum_j\int_\T |C_{m,j}-L_{m,j}|^2\dd a=o(1).

The L^2 norm of the leading array is bounded by a Riemann sum. Cauchy–Schwarz therefore gives the useful mass estimate

\sum_j\int_\T \left||C_{m,j}(a)|^2 -\frac1N W(j/N-m\Delta_N,a)\right|\dd a=o(1). \tag{2.16}

Cutoffs and transport. The map (u,a)\mapsto(mV(u),a) is injective on I\times\T. It takes disjoint compact supports with the same m to disjoint compact sets. Our choice of c separates the images for different m. The stated cutoffs \chi_\alpha therefore exist. For large N they equal one on the support of the corresponding leading array, since its s coordinate is shifted by only m_\alpha\Delta_N. Because each cutoff is one on the shifted leading-array support, the deleted exact coefficient mass is bounded by the summed squared C_{m,j}-L_{m,j} error, which tends to zero by the preceding estimate and Parseval’s identity. The same argument is valid after multiplication by \psi, proving (2.11) and (2.16) for the retained arrays with the factor \psi^2 on the right. The cutoffs make separation exact, not merely asymptotic. Different old m never contribute to the same retained j, and at a shared j the remaining supports in u'=a are disjoint. The factor \ee(ma') in (2.9) proves the asserted independence of the new spare-coordinate modulus, also after combining packets at one index. Linearity proves the statement about attached constants.

Fine temporal density. We first remove rounding before any fine-scale sampling. Smoothness and compact support of the fixed W give

\frac1N\sum_j\int_\T |W(j/N-m\Delta_N,a)-W(j/N,a)|\dd a=o(1). \tag{2.17}

For example, a uniform bound on \partial_s W and O(N) nonzero summands give an O(|m|/N) bound. The same holds with \psi^2 and for any residue subset. Pushforward contracts total variation, so (2.16) and (2.17) allow us to replace the retained squared coefficient measures by N^{-1}W(j/N,a)\psi(a)^2\dd a, at total error o(1), before pushing to temporal frequency. In particular, the actual lattice j/N is never translated by m\Delta_N.

On the retained arc, the change of variable y=sJ(a) gives

K(s,y)=\frac{W(s,a)\psi(a)^2}{|s|J'(a)}, \qquad a=J|_{I'}^{-1}(y/s), \tag{2.18}

with zero extension. The compact support of \psi inside I' makes this extension continuous (in fact smooth away from s=0). The real temporal frequency of a new angular index j is

t=j\sigma_N(a)=j/N+(j/N)J(a)/N. \tag{2.19}

The density of the pushforward of N^{-1}W(j/N,a)\psi(a)^2\dd a under this map is exactly K(j/N,Nt-j). The factor N in the density change of variable cancels the coefficient mass N^{-1}.

Choose Y so that K(s,y)=0 for |y|>Y. For fixed t, at most 2Y+2 integers contribute to either \sum_j K(j/N,Nt-j) or \sum_jK(t,Nt-j); on every contributing term |j/N-t|\le Y/N. Uniform continuity of K, and a fixed bounded interval containing the t supports for large N, prove that replacing j/N by t costs o(1) in L^1(\R). The same proof works after restriction to j\equiv h\pmod P. This is (2.13). Folding modulo one contracts the L^1 norm and finishes the proof.

It is useful to emphasize the normalization in (2.13). The periodization \sum_k K(t,y-kP) is a density relative to length on the circle of length P, so its mean value is

\frac1P\int_\T W(t,a)\psi(a)^2\dd a. \tag{2.20}

For P=1, folding t=z+l leaves the fast phase Nz unchanged, since N is an integer. For general P, the folded expression has phase N(z+l)-h modulo P; no divisibility condition on N is imposed.

Lemma 2.2 (Fast-variable averaging). Let P>0, and let G(t,y) be continuous, compactly supported in t, and P-periodic in y. Then, uniformly in real offsets \beta_N,

\int_\R G(t,Nt+\beta_N)\dd t \longrightarrow \frac1P\int_\R\int_0^P G(t,y)\dd y\dd t. \tag{2.21}

In particular, suppose w\ge0 is continuous and compactly supported in a compact set K\subset\R\setminus\{0\}. For continuous integrable densities \rho,\widetilde\rho define

\mathcal P_{s,P}\rho(y) =\sum_{k\in\Z}|s|^{-1}\rho((y+kP)/s).

Assume these periodizations are jointly continuous for s\in K. Then

\begin{align*} &\lim_{N\to\infty} \int_\R w(s) |\mathcal P_{s,P}\rho(Ns+\beta_N) -\mathcal P_{s,P}\widetilde\rho(Ns+\beta_N)|\dd s\tag{2.22}\\ &\hspace{12mm}= \frac1P\int_\R w(s)\int_0^P |\mathcal P_{s,P}\rho(y)-\mathcal P_{s,P}\widetilde\rho(y)| \dd y\dd s \le\frac{\|w\|_1}{P}\|\rho-\widetilde\rho\|_1.\end{align*}

Joint continuity is automatic, for example, if the densities are continuous with bounds C/(1+y^2), or are continuous and compactly supported. Neither density need have mass one.

Proof. Partition the t axis into intervals of length P/N on each of which Nt+\beta_N traverses one period. On each interval replace the slow argument t of G by an endpoint. Uniform continuity on the fixed compact support bounds the integrated error by a constant times its modulus of continuity at P/N, with an additional O(N^{-1}) boundary error. The resulting averages are Riemann sums for the right side of (2.21). This proves the first assertion, uniformly in the offset. Apply it to the continuous absolute difference in (2.22). The integral over one period of that difference is bounded by

\sum_k\int_0^P |s|^{-1} |\rho((y+kP)/s)-\widetilde\rho((y+kP)/s)|\dd y =\|\rho-\widetilde\rho\|_1.

Finally, on a compact set of nonzero s, quadratic tail bounds give a uniform summable bound C'/(1+k^2) on the periodizing summands, for 0\le y\le P. Uniform convergence proves joint continuity. Compactly supported densities are handled in the same way with only finitely many nonzero summands on that compact set.

In the special case |A(u,a)| is independent of a, (2.12) has the form W(s,a)=w(s). If \widetilde\rho\dd y=J_*(\psi^2\dd a), then K(s,y)=w(s)|s|^{-1}\widetilde\rho(y/s). Thus replacing the realized jitter law by a regular target law \rho in the fine-density prescription costs, after taking N sufficiently large, at most \|w\|_1\|\rho-\widetilde\rho\|_1+o(1) for the full density. One sums this estimate over the fixed packet list and folds modulo one. This is an averaged estimate along the fast variable, not a pointwise estimate of periodized densities from total variation. It is applied only after (2.17), so the family being averaged is fixed.

Lemma 2.3 (Realization of jitter laws). For any strictly positive smooth probability density \rho on \R and any \eps>0, there are a smooth real circle function J, an open arc I' with |\T\setminus I'|<\eps and J'>0 on I', and 0\le\psi\le1 in C_c^\infty(I'), such that

J_*(\psi^2\dd a)=\widetilde\rho(y)\dd y, \qquad \widetilde\rho\in C_c^\infty(\R), \qquad \|\rho-\widetilde\rho\|_1<\eps.

Here the cutoff law is a subprobability measure; no renormalization is made. Also \int_\T(1-\psi^2)\dd a<\eps.

Proof. Let F(y)=\int_{-\infty}^y\rho(v)\dd v. Strict positivity makes F a smooth diffeomorphism from \R to (0,1). Choose 0<\delta<\min(1/8,\eps/4) and a smooth function \xi compactly supported in (\delta/2,1-\delta/2) and equal to one on [\delta,1-\delta]. In the circle coordinate 0<a<1, set J(a)=\xi(a)F^{-1}(a) and extend it by zero near the identified endpoints. It is a smooth bounded circle function, and on I'=(\delta,1-\delta) it has derivative 1/\rho(F^{-1}(a))>0. Choose \psi\in C_c^\infty(I') with 0\le\psi\le1 and \psi=1 on [2\delta,1-2\delta]. Change of variables gives

\widetilde\rho(y)=\rho(y)\psi(F(y))^2\le\rho(y),\qquad \|\rho-\widetilde\rho\|_1 =1-\int_\T\psi^2\dd a\le4\delta<\eps.

Its support is compact because that of \psi is compactly inside (0,1). All the claims follow.

Lemma 2.4 (Weighted neutral refresh). Given a twist, its fixed physical chart, a finite disjoint smooth packet list with color densities p_r, a positive integer P, and a positive tolerance, one can perform a passage with the following simultaneous properties. Its physical map and inverse lie in any prescribed smooth neighborhood of the old ones. Its new good-arc complement is arbitrarily small. Every color vector is transported within the prescribed L^2 tolerance, retaining constant tags and disjointness. The new packet moduli are independent of the new spare coordinate. The output densities p'_r and the densities p'_{r,h} contributed by output indices j\equiv h\pmod P satisfy

\|p'_r-p_r\|_1<\eps, \qquad \|p'_{r,h}-p_r/P\|_1<\eps \quad(0\le h<P), \tag{2.23}

where \eps>0 may be prescribed arbitrarily. The integer c may first be required to exceed any fixed bound, and the retained supports may use any sufficiently small fixed enlargements of (2.8). If colors were disjoint in their old angular indices alone, their output angular index sets are still disjoint. The final passage integer N may exceed any prescribed bound.

Proof. Fix the old finite data and choose c as in Lemma 2.1, also satisfying its prescribed lower bound. Identify all but a small interval of the a circle with an interval in \R. Choose an open arc I' whose complement is as small as requested, and 0\le\psi\le1 compactly supported there and equal to one except on a set of sufficiently small length. The boundedness of the finitely many old amplitudes allows us to make both their L^2 cutoff errors and the removed squared masses arbitrarily small. Fix this cutoff before proceeding.

For a positive parameter L, take a smooth periodic function J_L equal to La+\beta on I', extending it smoothly across the complementary interval. Such an extension exists by taking a smooth cutoff equal to one on the closure of I' in a slightly larger real coordinate interval. In particular J_L'=L on I'. Put f_s(a)=W(s,a)\psi(a)^2, extended by zero in this real coordinate. The periodization of its pushforward by sJ_L is

\sum_{k\in\Z}\frac1{|s|L} f_s\left(\frac{(y+kP)/s-\beta}{L}\right). \tag{2.24}

This is 1/P times a Riemann sum for \int f_s(a)\dd a, of mesh P/(|s|L), with an arbitrary lattice offset and possibly reversed orientation. The error is bounded by

\frac{\|\partial_a f_s\|_{L^1(\R)}}{|s|L}. \tag{2.25}

Indeed compare each lattice value times the mesh with the integral on its cell, using the fundamental theorem of calculus and summing the absolute derivative. Since s ranges over a fixed compact set away from zero, this bound tends to zero uniformly in s and y. It remains valid for arbitrary fixed dependence of the original amplitude on a.

Choose L large enough for these uniform errors to be as small as needed for the finite packet list. Now J_L and all its norms are fixed. Choose the support cutoffs in Lemma 2.1, and then take N sufficiently large. Its fine-density rule, together with (2.24), approximates each unfolded residue density by P^{-1}\int W(s,a)\psi(a)^2\dd a in L^1. Folding modulo one gives p_r/P, up to the small cutoff loss; the integer mc in mV has no effect on this folding. The estimate is uniform in the periodic phase, so the folding offsets Nl cause no difficulty. Summing the residue estimates gives the total density estimate, upon initially making each error smaller by the fixed factor P if necessary. Norm transport, exact support properties, and smooth proximity follow from the same passage lemma. All constraints on N are lower bounds imposed after the physical chart, the amplitudes, c, the cutoff, L, and the support neighborhoods have been fixed.

Remark 2.5. A common passage can handle finitely many packet lists, requiring disjointness only within each list. Choose c using the union of their old indices, choose the neutral cutoff and slope to meet all their finitely many mass and density bounds, and choose N above all the resulting lower bounds. Support cutoffs are chosen separately for each list, disjoint within that list. The norm and density conclusions then hold for every list; no orthogonality between different lists is asserted.

All these operations preserve real data. Include together the packets (m,A) and (-m,\overline A), attach conjugate tags, and choose \chi_{-m}(s,a)=\chi_m(-s,a). The exact coefficients obey C_{-m,-j}=\overline{C_{m,j}}, and all other cutoffs are real. Thus conjugate packets and conjugate colors can be retained at every passage.

3 Small Fourier signals

The purpose of this section is to modulate a packet’s spectral density according to its angular index. The size of the modulation will depend on a fixed band of normalized indices, but not on the scale of those indices. The integer added to the old speed is allowed to depend on the actual, finite set of indices.

Fix numbers 0<b<D_0 and a function

d\in C_c^\infty(\R\setminus\{0\};\C), \qquad d(-x)=\overline{d(x)}. \tag{3.1}

A scale is a positive real number B, and the normalized index of a packet at angular index m is x=m/B.

Lemma 3.1 (Transmission of an index signal). For the fixed data b,D_0,d there are an integer P\ge2 and a number \gamma_0>0 with the following property. Any fixed 0<\gamma\le\gamma_0 can be used, independently of B.

Let S be an intermediate map, and let

F_r=\sum_{m\in\mathcal M_r} A_{r,m}(u,a)\ee(m\theta)

be finite smooth packet data in its good arc. Suppose that the finite sets \mathcal M_r\subset\Z\setminus\{0\} are mutually disjoint, |A_{r,m}(u,a)| is independent of a, and b\le |m|/B\le D_0. Write p_{r,m} for the spectral density of the indicated packet. Given any \eps,\delta_x,\delta_z>0 and prescribed positive bounds for the physical L^2 transport errors, a passage produces finite output packet sums F_{r,m}^+, approximating the corresponding input packets in physical L^2, whose spectral densities satisfy

\sum_{r,m}\left\|p_{r,m}^+ -p_{r,m}(z)\left[1+2\gamma\1_{\gcd(m,P)=1} \Rea\{d(m/B)\ee(-Nz)\}\right]\right\|_{L^1(\T)} <\eps. \tag{3.2}

The new scale is B^+=NcB, and the new speed is \sigma_N from Lemma 2.1. For every point (u',a') in the coefficient support of a retained output packet of index j descending from (r,m), there is (u,a)\in\supp A_{r,m} such that

\left|\frac{j}{B^+}-\frac mB\right|<\delta_x, \qquad \dist_\T\bigl(j\sigma_N(u'),m\phi(u)\bigr)<\delta_z. \tag{3.3}

Its modulus is independent of the new spare coordinate. Distinct old angular indices have disjoint output angular-index supports. Conjugate symmetry is preserved when present.

The passage and its inverse can lie in any prescribed smooth neighborhood of S and S^{-1} in physical coordinates, and the new good arc can have arbitrarily small complement. The choices can be made in the order c, a bounded smooth jitter and cutoffs, and finally the integer N. After the preceding choices, every sufficiently large integer N works. In particular an arbitrary lower bound on N can be imposed.

Proof. A positive law. We first construct a positive law without using B. We use the positive-exponent Fourier convention

\widehat q(v)=\int_\R q(R)\ee(vR)\,\dd R.

Choose 0<\alpha<b/2, put a_0=(2\alpha)^{-1}, and define

s_\alpha(R)=\alpha\left(\frac{\sin(\pi\alpha R)} {\pi\alpha R}\right)^2, \qquad q_0(R)=\frac1{2a_0}\int_{-a_0}^{a_0}s_\alpha(R-t)\,\dd t, \tag{3.4}

with the removable value at the origin understood. Fourier inversion for an interval, followed by convolution, gives

\widehat{s_\alpha}(v)=(1-|v|/\alpha)_+.

Consequently q_0 is a smooth probability density with Fourier support in [-\alpha,\alpha]. It is strictly positive: the interval of translations in (3.4) cannot be contained in the discrete zero set of s_\alpha.

Here a quantitative lower tail is useful. Since the averaging interval has length 1/\alpha, it contains exactly one period of \sin^2(\pi\alpha(R-t)) as a function of t. For |R|\ge2a_0+1 this gives

\frac1{2\pi^2\alpha(|R|+a_0)^2} \le q_0(R) \le\frac1{\pi^2\alpha(|R|-a_0)^2}.

Positivity and continuity on the remaining compact interval therefore give constants c_0,C_0>0 such that

\frac{c_0}{1+R^2}\le q_0(R)\le\frac{C_0}{1+R^2} \qquad(R\in\R). \tag{3.5}

Choose D>b such that \supp d\subset[-D,D], and then an integer L>\max(2,D/b). Let P be the product of all primes at most L. The strict inequality in this choice will allow a small dilation of the Fourier arguments. Define

g(R)=\int_\R d(v)\ee(-vR)\,\dd v, \qquad C_P(h)=\sum_{k\in(\Z/P\Z)^\times}\ee(-kh/P) \quad(0\le h<P).

The function g is Schwartz by repeated integration by parts. The symmetry in (3.1) makes it real, and \int g=d(0)=0. The number C_P(h) is real because the set of units is invariant under negation. Set

Q_h(R)=\frac1P\bigl[q_0(R)+\gamma C_P(h)g(R)\bigr]. \tag{3.6}

For G=\sup_R(1+R^2)|g(R)| and C_* =\max_h|C_P(h)|, choose \gamma_0>0 so small that

\gamma_0 C_*G\le c_0/2, \qquad 2\gamma_0\|d\|_\infty\le1/2;

a zero factor imposes no restriction. Then, for every permitted \gamma,

\frac{q_0(R)}{2P}\le Q_h(R)\le\frac{3q_0(R)}{2P}, \qquad \int_\R Q_h(R)\,\dd R=\frac1P. \tag{3.7}

Thus Q_h(R)\,\dd R defines a probability law on \R\times\{0,\ldots,P-1\}. Finite Fourier inversion gives, for every v\in\R and k\in\Z,

\sum_{h=0}^{P-1}\int_\R Q_h(R)\ee(vR+kh/P)\,\dd R =\widehat q_0(v)\1_{k\equiv0\ (P)} +\gamma d(v)\1_{\gcd(k,P)=1}. \tag{3.8}

Indeed the sum over h pairs C_P(h) with the character at k, leaving precisely the indicator that k is a unit. All choices up to this point are independent of B, the map, and its finite packet list.

Moments and the finite sieve. For fixed B and an integer c>0, consider the random variable

J_*=(R/B+h/P)/c \tag{3.9}

under this law. Its density is

\rho_{B,c}(y)=cB\sum_{h=0}^{P-1}Q_h\bigl(B(cy-h/P)\bigr).

It is a strictly positive smooth probability density. The bounds (3.7) imply quadratic upper and lower tails, with constants now allowed to depend on B,c.

We calculate the periodized density of sJ_*. Write x=m/B and s=mct. For its positive integer Fourier moments, the exact formula is

M_\ell(t)=\frac1P\sum_{h=0}^{P-1}\ee(\ell mt h/P) \bigl[\widehat q_0(\ell xt) +\gamma C_P(h)d(\ell xt)\bigr],\qquad \ell\ge1. \tag{3.10}

At t=1, (3.8) applies. Its baseline term vanishes since |\ell x|\ge b>\alpha. If \ell\ge2 and d(\ell x)\ne0, then \ell\le D/b<L. Some prime divisor of \ell therefore divides P, so \gcd(\ell m,P)>1. It follows that

M_1(1)=\gamma d(x)\1_{\gcd(m,P)=1}, \qquad M_\ell(1)=0\quad(\ell\ge2). \tag{3.11}

For finite c the discrete phases in (3.10) need not be residue characters. We estimate their errors before using the sieve. Choose \tau\in(1/2,1) so that D/(\tau b)<L, and take c large enough that

t_N(u)=1+\frac{\phi(u)+\Delta_N}{c}\ge\tau, \qquad |\Delta_N|\le1/N,

on the old supports, uniformly for N\ge1. The baseline term in (3.10) then vanishes for every \ell\ge1, since |\ell xt_N|\ge\tau b>\alpha. The perturbation also vanishes identically when \ell>D/(\tau b). Hence nonintegral discrete phases cannot introduce an unbounded collection of harmonics. For the fixed remaining finite set, put C_1=P^{-1}\sum_h|C_P(h)|. The elementary bound |\ee(v)-\ee(w)|\le2\pi|v-w| gives

|M_\ell(t)-M_\ell(1)| \le\gamma C_1\ell \bigl[D_0\|d'\|_\infty+2\pi|m|\|d\|_\infty\bigr]|t-1|. \tag{3.12}

We may thus make the sum of all moment errors arbitrarily small by choosing c after the actual finite set of old indices. In particular c is allowed to grow with \max|m|; \gamma does not need to decrease. The same choice can make the ranges m(c+\phi(\T)) for distinct old indices disjoint and bounded away from zero.

To pass from moments to densities, let

\mathcal P_s\rho(y) =\sum_{k\in\Z}\frac1{|s|}\rho((y+k)/s),\qquad y\in\T.

Once c has been chosen, all the relevant s ranges are fixed compact sets away from zero. No bound on these sets uniform over future passages is needed. For s in a fixed compact subset of \R\setminus\{0\}, the quadratic upper tail of \rho_{B,c} makes this a jointly continuous function of (s,y), with uniformly summable tails. Its Fourier coefficients in the positive-exponent convention are the moments just computed. The compact bandwidth shows that its Fourier series is a finite sum on the relevant branches. Fourier uniqueness and (3.11)–(3.12) therefore give, uniformly on those branches and in y,

\mathcal P_s\rho_{B,c}(y) =1+2\gamma\1_{\gcd(m,P)=1}\Rea\{d(m/B)\ee(-y)\} +o_{c\to\infty}(1). \tag{3.13}

The error here is for the fixed old list and scale B. The negative exponent follows directly from our convention: \int\mathcal P_s\rho(y)\ee(\ell y)\,\dd y=M_\ell.

Realization and support. We now realize this law by a passage. Lemma 2.3 provides a bounded smooth circle function J, strictly increasing on a good arc, and a smooth cutoff \psi compactly supported in that arc, such that the subprobability law

\widetilde\rho=J_*(\psi(a)^2\,\dd a)

is arbitrarily close to \rho_{B,c} in total variation. Its missing mass is included in this error. The good arc has as small a complement as requested. Since |A_{r,m}| is independent of a, its stationary weight is a function of s alone:

w_{r,m}(s)=\frac{|A_{r,m}(u,a)|^2}{|m\phi'(u)|}, \qquad m(c+\phi(u))=s,

extended by zero. For such a nonnegative compactly supported weight, Lemma 2.2 and contraction of total variation under pushforward and periodization give

\begin{align*} &\lim_{N\to\infty}\int_\R w_{r,m}(s) |\mathcal P_s\widetilde\rho(Ns) -\mathcal P_s\rho_{B,c}(Ns)|\,\dd s \\ &\qquad=\int_\R w_{r,m}(s)\int_\T |\mathcal P_s\widetilde\rho(y) -\mathcal P_s\rho_{B,c}(y)|\,\dd y\,\dd s \\ &\qquad\le\|w_{r,m}\|_1\|\widetilde\rho-\rho_{B,c}\|_{L^1(\R)}. \tag{3.14}\end{align*}

Here densities of subprobabilities are used in the L^1 norm. The realized law has a continuous compactly supported density; the ideal law has the uniform tail bound established above. These facts supply the continuity and domination required for fast averaging. The independence of the weight from a is essential in this step.

Lemma 2.1 identifies the output density, up to an arbitrarily small L^1 error, as the folding to \T of w_{r,m}(s)\mathcal P_s\widetilde\rho(Ns). In using that lemma the rounding correction is removed at the coefficient-mass level: its replacement of w_{r,m}(s) by w_{r,m}(s-m\Delta_N) costs o(1) in the summed masses. It does not translate the fast argument Ns. Alternatively, (3.12) also holds uniformly with t=t_N. Since cm and N are integers,

p_{r,m}(z)=\sum_{k\in\Z}w_{r,m}(z+k), \qquad \ee(-N(z+k))=\ee(-Nz).

Now (3.13), (3.14), and the passage density formula prove (3.2). Choose c first to make its error sufficiently small, then the law approximation, and then N. The finite packet list allows all errors to be summed.

For completeness we give the simultaneous support estimates, which will also apply to neutral passages. Put M=\max_{r,m}|m|, with M=0 for an empty packet list. By the support cutoff in Lemma 2.1, at each retained point of an output packet at index j there is a point u in its old support for which

j/N=m(c+\phi(u)+\Delta_N)+\eta, \qquad |\eta|\le\eta_0, \tag{3.15}

where the image enlargement \eta_0 can be as small as desired. If x'=j/(NcB) and z'=j/N+(j/N)J(a)/N is the new temporal frequency, then

\begin{align*} |x'-m/B| &\le\frac{D_0(\|\phi\|_\infty+1)}c+\frac{\eta_0}{cB}, \tag{3.16}\\ \dist_\T(z',m\phi(u)) &\le\frac MN+\eta_0 +\frac{[M(c+\|\phi\|_\infty+1)+\eta_0]\|J\|_\infty}{N}. \tag{3.17}\end{align*}

Choose c for the first bound and index separation, then \eta_0 and the bounded J, and finally N for the second bound. A large bound on J only increases the eventual requirement on N. These choices also give physical smooth closeness of the passage and its inverse and the required L^2 approximations, by Lemma 2.1.

Every new coefficient descending from old index m has the form \ee(ma_{\rm new}) times a scalar function of the new speed coordinate. Because different old indices have disjoint retained new index ranges, their spare-coordinate phases are never added at one new index. Thus the resulting packet moduli are independent of the new spare coordinate. All cutoffs can be chosen in conjugate pairs, so conjugation is retained as well.

We next remove the coprimality restriction by placing a neutral passage before transmission. The output residue classes of the neutral passage, rather than the input residue classes, are the ones tested in the transmission.

Lemma 3.2 (Refresh and transmission). Fix b,D_0,d,P,\gamma as in Lemma 3.1, and put

\lambda=\gamma\frac{|(\Z/P\Z)^\times|}{P}>0. \tag{3.18}

Suppose finite colored packet data have mutually disjoint angular-index sets and moduli independent of the spare coordinate. Suppose their normalized indices lie in a fixed compact subset of \{x:b<|x|<D_0\}. Let p_r be the color densities, and let d_r:\T\to\C be continuous functions such that on the support of every input packet of color r,

|d(m/B)-d_r(m\phi(u)\bmod1)|\le\omega. \tag{3.19}

Then a neutral passage followed by a transmission gives output colors with

\sum_r\left\|p_r^+ -p_r(z)\bigl[1+2\lambda\Rea\{d_r(z)\ee(-Nz)\}\bigr] \right\|_1 \le 2\gamma\omega\sum_r\|p_r\|_1+\eps, \tag{3.20}

where \eps>0 is arbitrary and N is the second passage integer. The physical map and inverse, the physical packet vectors, and the normalized-index and temporal-frequency displacements can all be controlled with arbitrary prescribed positive error bounds. Output packet moduli remain independent of the spare coordinate, and colors remain disjoint in angular indices. The final N can exceed any prescribed bound. Conjugate-symmetric data can be treated conjugate-symmetrically.

If different colors start in separated compact normalized-index sets, any fixed sufficiently small enlargements of those sets can contain their outputs. The same conclusion holds through any fixed finite number of such pairs, with positive margins around the band b<|x|<D_0. If the input supports satisfy \dist_\T(m/B,m\phi(u))\le\kappa, the output supports satisfy the same inequality with \kappa increased by an arbitrarily small amount.

Proof. Use Lemma 2.4 with residue modulus P. Denote the refreshed scale by \widetilde B, its packet densities by \widetilde p_{r,m}, and its color-residue densities by

\widetilde p_{r,h}=\sum_{m\equiv h\ (P)}\widetilde p_{r,m}.

That lemma makes

E_r=\sum_{h=0}^{P-1} \|\widetilde p_{r,h}-p_r/P\|_1 \tag{3.21}

arbitrarily small. It also retains disjoint output angular-index sets and gives moduli independent of the new spare coordinate. To control its support, first choose its c as large as necessary for (3.16); next choose its cutoff and broad linear jitter for the residue equalization; finally choose its passage integer for (3.17). Thus equalizing residues does not prevent either displacement from being arbitrarily small.

For a continuous function f on its relevant compact domain, denote its modulus of continuity by \nu_f(t)=\sup_{\dist(v,w)\le t}|f(v)-f(w)|. If the refresh changes normalized indices by at most \delta_x and temporal frequencies by at most \delta_z, its retained color supports satisfy

|d(m/\widetilde B)-d_r(z)| \le\rho_r:=\omega+\nu_d(\delta_x)+\nu_{d_r}(\delta_z). \tag{3.22}

This follows pointwise by linking an output support point to an old one and using (3.19). In particular the extra terms tend to zero. The compact margin in the normalized band lets us apply Lemma 3.1 with the same P,\gamma after this refresh, although its actual indices and scale may be very large.

By that lemma the transmission density, with an arbitrarily small summed error T_r for color r, is

\widetilde p_r(z)+2\gamma\Rea\left\{\ee(-Nz) \sum_{\gcd(m,P)=1}d(m/\widetilde B) \widetilde p_{r,m}(z)\right\}.

Replacing the coefficient in this sum by d_r(z) costs at most 2\gamma\rho_r\|\widetilde p_r\|_1 in L^1. Also,

\|\widetilde p_r-p_r\|_1\le E_r, \qquad \left\|\sum_{h\in(\Z/P\Z)^\times}\widetilde p_{r,h} -\frac{|(\Z/P\Z)^\times|}{P}p_r\right\|_1\le E_r.

Consequently the color’s total error against the target in (3.20) is bounded by

T_r+(1+2\gamma\|d_r\|_\infty)E_r +2\gamma\rho_r(\|p_r\|_1+E_r). \tag{3.23}

Choose the refresh errors, displacements, and transmission errors small enough and sum this bound over the finite list. This proves (3.20), including the exact value of \lambda. Only residue balancing after summing over a color was needed, because (3.22) holds pointwise before the sum.

The remaining assertions follow from the two passage lemmas and (3.16)–(3.17). Specifically, the triangle inequality gives

\dist_\T(x',z')\le\dist_\T(x,z)+|x'-x|+\dist_\T(z',z).

Positive separation distances and the fixed finite number of passages allow displacement budgets smaller than all band margins and color gaps. Constants such as \lambda are fixed before these error budgets are imposed. The required c and passage integers may then be chosen afresh after each actual finite packet list is known.

4 Finite blocks and prediction

The signal from Lemma 3.2 can be arbitrarily weak. We use many such signals, holding one centering function fixed throughout each block. For a block with n\lambda^2 comparable to \delta, the square-root integral loses O(\delta^2), while the estimator has mean-square error O(1/\delta). Averaging the estimators from K blocks gives mean-square error O((K\delta)^{-1}) with total loss O(K\delta^2). Thus K\delta can grow while K\delta^2 tends to zero.

Proposition 4.1 (Prediction of a tagged packet sum). Let S be an intermediate map, expressed in a fixed physical volume-preserving coordinate chart. Let

F_r=\sum_{m\in\mathcal M_r} A_{r,m}(u,a)\ee(m\theta), \qquad F=\sum_r F_r,

be a finite list of colors of smooth packets supported compactly in the good arc. Suppose that the finite sets \mathcal M_r\subset\Z\setminus\{0\} are pairwise disjoint, that |A_{r,m}(u,a)| is independent of a, and that the list is invariant under complex conjugation: F_{r^*}=\overline{F_r}. In particular, F is real. Let p_r be the corresponding spectral densities, put p=\sum_r p_r, and suppose that

\int_\T p(z)\,\dd z\le \frac32.

Assign constants b_r\in\C satisfying b_{r^*}=\overline{b_r}.

Given \eps,\tau,\kappa>0 and any neighborhood of the physical map and its inverse in the smooth topology, there are a finite sequence of passages, a final intermediate map S', final packets F'_r, and a smooth function \Psi:\T\to\C, such that

\begin{align*} \sum_r\|F'_r-F_r\|_2&<\eps, \tag{4.1}\\ \int_\T\sqrt{p'(z)}\,\dd z &\ge \int_\T\sqrt{p(z)}\,\dd z-\tau, \qquad p'=\sum_r p'_r, \tag{4.2}\\ \left\|\sum_r b_rF'_r- \Psi(U_{S'})\sum_r F'_r\right\|_2&<\eps. \tag{4.3}\end{align*}

Here the differences in (4.1) are measured in the original physical L^2 space. All the physical maps and their inverses can be kept in the prescribed neighborhood. The final good arc I' satisfies |\T\setminus I'|<\kappa. The output colors again have disjoint nonzero angular-index sets, moduli independent of the spare coordinate, and conjugation symmetry. The multiplier can be chosen with \Psi(-z)=\overline{\Psi(z)}.

We first record the precise averaging assertion needed in the proof. In the following lemma, a Laurent polynomial in w_1,\ldots,w_n means a finite linear combination of the monomials w^\nu=\prod_i w_i^{\nu_i}, with \nu\in\Z^n.

Lemma 4.2 (Finite phase tests). Fix finitely many expressions

P_j(z,w)=\sum_{\nu\in\mathcal E_j}c_{j,\nu}(z)w^\nu, \qquad c_{j,\nu}\in L^1(\T),

where each \mathcal E_j is finite. For every \eta>0, successively large positive integers L_1,\ldots,L_n can be chosen so that, simultaneously for all j,

\left|\int_\T P_j\bigl(z,\ee(L_1z),\ldots,\ee(L_nz)\bigr)\,\dd z -\int_\T\int_{\T^n}P_j\bigl(z,\ee(y_1),\ldots,\ee(y_n)\bigr) \,\dd y\,\dd z\right|<\eta. \tag{4.4}

At each selection, L_i may additionally be required to exceed any finite lower bound determined by the preceding choices and the then-current construction data.

Proof. Let D bound the absolute values of all the exponents in all the \mathcal E_j. The integral of a nonconstant monomial on the product torus is zero. On the one-dimensional diagonal its contribution is a Fourier coefficient of c_{j,\nu} at -\sum_i\nu_iL_i. The Fourier coefficients of an L^1 function tend to zero: this follows by approximation in L^1 by trigonometric polynomials, whose sufficiently high Fourier coefficients vanish. Since the coefficient list is finite, choose R so that the sum of the bounds for all these nonconstant contributions is less than \eta whenever their frequencies have absolute value greater than R. Choose successively

L_j>R+D\sum_{i<j}L_i,

as well as the additional finite lower bounds. If j is the last nonzero position of \nu, then

\left|\sum_i\nu_iL_i\right| \ge L_j-D\sum_{i<j}L_i>R.

This proves the assertion. No independence assertion about the distribution of the entire diagonal is made or needed.

Proof of Proposition 4.1. Zero colors may be omitted. If all colors vanish, a neutral passage with zero output packets and \Psi=0 proves the assertion, including the requested new good arc. Hence assume that a nonzero color is present. Dividing all tags by \max(1,\max_r|b_r|) and reducing the requested prediction tolerance reduces the proof to |b_r|\le1. The transport and square-root tolerances remain independently adjustable. We work under this normalization until the end.

The data fixed at the beginning of a block. For the moment suppose that the current packet mass is at most 2. Write its actual densities as p_r, put p=\sum_rp_r, and on \{p>0\} set

t_r=\frac{p_r}{p},\qquad \beta=\sum_r t_rb_r.

Set \beta=0 on \{p=0\}. Then |\beta|\le1 and \beta(-z)=\overline{\beta(z)}. Fix 0<\delta\le1/100. There is a smooth circle function q such that

|q|\le2,\qquad q(-z)=\overline{q(z)},\qquad \int_\T\sqrt p\,|\beta-q|^2\,\dd z<\delta. \tag{4.5}

Indeed, convolve \beta with an even nonnegative smooth approximate identity. The convolutions have absolute value at most 1, have the required symmetry, and converge almost everywhere to \beta. Since \sqrt p\in L^1, dominated convergence gives (4.5). In particular this choice does not require any uniform bound on derivatives of q.

Let A be any fixed bounded function on the temporal circle. In the iteration, A will be the sum of the estimators from k already completed blocks. Both q and A are fixed before any frequencies for the present block are chosen. The densities p_r in every model below are these actual pre-block densities.

Anchoring, with the number of passages fixed first. Choose an integer c_0 large enough that the full compact ranges m(c_0+\phi(\T)) for distinct old indices are separated and avoid zero, as required by Lemma 2.1. In particular this separates the compact packet images

m(c_0+\phi(u)),\qquad u\in\operatorname{proj}_u\supp A_{r,m},

for all distinct old indices m. Let K_r be the union of the images belonging to color r. The K_r are disjoint compact sets and K_{r^*}=-K_r. Choose slightly larger compact neighborhoods of them, still disjoint and off zero, and then disjoint open neighborhoods with compact closures. We will retain enough room between these two families of neighborhoods for all the support movements in the block. There is a smooth compactly supported function on \R\setminus\{0\} such that

d(-x)=\overline{d(x)},\qquad d(x)=b_r-q(x\bmod1) \quad\hbox{on a neighborhood of the enlarged }K_r. \tag{4.6}

For example, use disjoint smooth cutoffs equal to one near these sets, chosen compatibly with reflection, and multiply the rth cutoff by b_r-q(x\bmod1). Fix 0<b_0<D_0 such that all the retained neighborhoods lie strictly inside \{b_0<|x|<D_0\}.

Apply Lemma 3.1 to this fixed d and these band bounds. It gives a modulus P and an arbitrarily small positive strength \gamma, independently of the future angular scale. Put

\lambda=\gamma\frac{|(\Z/P\Z)^\times|}{P}.

Take \gamma so small that 6\lambda<1 and \lambda^2\le\delta/2, and choose an integer n\ge1 with

\frac\delta2\le n\lambda^2\le\delta. \tag{4.7}

One may take n=\lfloor\delta/\lambda^2\rfloor. At this point q,c_0,K_r,d,P,\gamma,\lambda,n are all fixed. In particular they have been chosen before the integer of the anchor passage. The error targets used below depend only on these data, the already fixed A,k, and the requested tolerance \nu. They can therefore be fixed now, before executing the anchor.

Now make a neutral passage with the already fixed c_0, choosing its jitter and its integer N_0 for the required accuracy. Use B=N_0 as the output angular scale. Lemmas 2.1 and 2.4 give color densities as close to p_r in L^1 as desired. On their retained supports the normalized indices x=j/N_0 lie in arbitrarily small enlargements of K_r. If J_0 is the bounded jitter chosen for this passage, their actual temporal frequencies satisfy

z=x+xJ_0(a)/N_0\pmod1.

Thus \dist_{\T}(x\bmod1,z) can be made arbitrarily small after J_0 is fixed, by increasing N_0.

We follow this anchor by n refresh–transmit pairs from Lemma 3.2. At every passage the scale changes by B'=NcB. The support estimates (3.16)–(3.17), which apply to neutral as well as transmitting passages, control normalized-index and temporal-frequency movement separately. Choose c and sufficiently small support enlargements to meet the movement budgets; in particular, the enlargement is smaller than the temporal tolerance because its contribution there is not divided by N. Fix the bounded jitter J next, and choose N last for the remaining terms. Thus an arbitrarily broad neutral jitter remains compatible with temporal tracking.

There are only 2n+1 passages in this block. Apportion small enough movement budgets among them so that all normalized indices remain in the neighborhoods on which (4.6) holds, and so that \dist_{\T}(x\bmod1,z) remains below any prescribed positive tolerance. Uniform continuity of the fixed q then makes

|d(x)-(b_r-q(z))| \tag{4.8}

uniformly as small as needed on every retained support of color r. The positive gaps preserve disjoint angular-index supports. Each passage preserves the independent-of-spare-coordinate modulus property and conjugation symmetry.

The product model and its approximation. Put a_r(z)=b_r-q(z), so |a_r|\le3. Denote the integer of the ith transmission by L_i. The model after i transmissions is

h_r^{(i)}(z)=p_r(z)\prod_{j=1}^i f_{r,j}(z),\qquad f_{r,j}(z)=1+2\lambda\Rea\{a_r(z)\ee(-L_jz)\}. \tag{4.9}

All factors are positive, and f_{r,j}\le M=1+6\lambda<2. Let g_r^{(i)} be the actual densities after these pairs, with g_r^{(0)} the anchor densities. The refresh–transmit lemma, including the substitution (4.8), allows

\sum_r\|g_r^{(i)}-g_r^{(i-1)}f_{r,i}\|_1<\eta_i, \qquad \sum_r\|g_r^{(0)}-p_r\|_1<\eta_0.

Indeed the substitution costs at most 2\gamma\omega\sum_r\int g_r^{(i-1)} if its uniform error is \omega; the remaining error is freely adjustable. We may first choose the movement tolerance small enough for all the finitely many \eta_i, and then implement each pair on its actual finite input. Consequently

E_i:=\sum_r\|g_r^{(i)}-h_r^{(i)}\|_1 \le ME_{i-1}+\eta_i, \qquad E_n\le M^n\eta_0+\sum_{i=1}^nM^{n-i}\eta_i. \tag{4.10}

For any prescribed e_0>0, it suffices to choose every \eta_i<e_0/((n+1)M^n) to obtain E_n<e_0. All quantities in this accuracy requirement were fixed before the anchor. Even if \lambda is extremely small and n and M^n are extremely large, they are finite known numbers.

The frequencies L_i remain free to exceed arbitrary successive lower bounds. In particular, Lemma 4.2 can be applied to any finite list of Laurent polynomials whose coefficient functions depend only on the pre-block data

p_r,\ t_r,\ q,\ A,\ b_r,\ n,\ \lambda. \tag{4.11}

The actual packets depend on previous choices, but appear only in (4.10), not in this fixed coefficient list. At the ith pair, first choose its refresh and all its transmission data preceding the passage integer; then choose L_i large enough for both the physical construction and the phase-test lower bound. Thus the averaging and the construction impose compatible lower bounds on the same integer.

The square-root integral. Introduce independent Haar phases Z_1,\ldots,Z_n solely for computing the product-torus averages in Lemma 4.2. At each fixed z put

H_r=\prod_{i=1}^n [1+\lambda(a_r\overline{Z_i}+\overline{a_r}Z_i)], \qquad R=\sum_r t_rH_r.

The following pointwise calculations are on \{p>0\}; all their integrands are multiplied by p_r or \sqrt p and are extended by zero on its complement. We have

\mathbb E H_r=1, \qquad \mathbb E(H_rH_s) =(1+2\lambda^2\Rea(a_r\overline{a_s}))^n, \qquad \mathbb E R=1. \tag{4.12}

For real y and integer n\ge1, the binomial expansion gives

|(1+y)^n-1-ny| \le\sum_{j=2}^n\frac{(n|y|)^j}{j!} \le\frac{(n|y|)^2}{2}\exp(n|y|).

Apply this with y=2\lambda^2\Rea(a_r\overline{a_s}); then n|y|\le18\delta. Since \sum_rt_r=1, the sum of the linear terms in (4.12) is 2n\lambda^2|\sum_rt_ra_r|^2. Therefore

\mathbb E(R-1)^2 \le2\delta|\beta-q|^2+162e^{18\delta}\delta^2. \tag{4.13}

This bound is uniform in the number of colors and in all the later geometric parameters.

For every x\ge0,

\sqrt x\ge1+\frac{x-1}{2}-(x-1)^2. \tag{4.14}

In fact, on setting t=\sqrt x, the difference between the two sides equals (t-1)^2(t^2+2t+1/2). Multiplying (4.14) by \sqrt p, taking the independent-phase expectation, and using (4.5) and (4.13) shows that the averaged polynomial lower bound is at least

\int_\T\sqrt p\,\dd z -2\delta^2-162e^{18\delta}\delta^2\int_\T\sqrt p\,\dd z \ge \int_\T\sqrt p\,\dd z-300\delta^2.

Here \int\sqrt p\le\sqrt2 and \delta\le1/100 were used.

The expression

\sqrt p\,[1+(R-1)/2-(R-1)^2]

is a Laurent polynomial in the phases with fixed integrable coefficients. Lemma 4.2 therefore transfers this lower bound, up to any prescribed error, to the diagonal phases Z_i=\ee(L_i z). On that diagonal pR=\sum_r h_r^{(n)}. There is no need to apply the lemma to \sqrt R itself. Finally, for nonnegative densities g,h on the unit circle,

\left|\int_\T\sqrt g-\int_\T\sqrt h\right| \le\left(\int_\T|g-h|\right)^{1/2}, \tag{4.15}

by (\sqrt g-\sqrt h)^2\le|g-h| and Cauchy–Schwarz. Thus the actual output density p^{\rm out}=\sum_rg_r^{(n)} satisfies, for any chosen \nu>0 and sufficiently accurate construction,

\int_\T\sqrt{p^{\rm out}}\,\dd z \ge\int_\T\sqrt p\,\dd z-300\delta^2-\nu. \tag{4.16}

Prediction and a previous estimator. With the same formal phases, put

D=q+\frac1{n\lambda}\sum_{i=1}^n Z_i.

For a fixed color r and fixed z, H_r is a positive probability density on the product phase torus, and under this density the phases remain independent. Direct integration of one factor gives

\mathbb E_{H_r}Z_i=\lambda a_r, \qquad \mathbb E_{H_r}|Z_i-\lambda a_r|^2 =1-\lambda^2|a_r|^2.

Consequently

\mathbb E_{H_r}D=b_r, \qquad \mathbb E_{H_r}|D-b_r|^2 =\frac{1-\lambda^2|a_r|^2}{n\lambda^2} \le\frac2\delta. \tag{4.17}

For the arbitrary fixed bounded previous estimator A, this means that the cross term against A-kb_r vanishes at each z:

\mathbb E_{H_r}|A+D-(k+1)b_r|^2 =|A-kb_r|^2+\mathbb E_{H_r}|D-b_r|^2.

After multiplying by p_r, summing, and integrating, the increase in this mean square is at most 4/\delta.

The expression

\sum_r p_rH_r|A+q+(n\lambda)^{-1}\textstyle\sum_iZ_i-(k+1)b_r|^2

is another finite Laurent polynomial with the fixed integrable coefficients in (4.11). Apply Lemma 4.2 to it simultaneously with the preceding square-root lower-bound test. Write

D(z)=q(z)+\frac1{n\lambda}\sum_{i=1}^n\ee(L_i z) \tag{4.18}

for the resulting actual multiplier. Its norm is bounded by 2+1/\lambda, independently of the choices of L_i. In passing from model to actual color densities, the error in the prediction integral is at most W E_n, where

W=(\|A\|_\infty+2+1/\lambda+k+1)^2. \tag{4.19}

This finite number is known before choosing the anchor accuracy or any transmission frequencies. For example, choose

e_0<\min\{(\nu/4)^2,\nu/(4W)\},

and make the two phase-test errors less than \nu/2. Together with (4.10) this proves

\sum_r\int_\T p_r^{\rm out}|A+D-(k+1)b_r|^2\,\dd z \le\sum_r\int_\T p_r|A-kb_r|^2\,\dd z +\frac4\delta+\nu, \tag{4.20}

simultaneously with (4.16). The same e_0 and support accuracies can be imposed before the anchor. Thus a small strength entails a more demanding finite accuracy requirement, without a circular parameter choice.

Iteration of blocks. All color vectors can be transported with an arbitrarily small sum of physical norm errors at every passage. Reserve a total such budget smaller than

\min\{\eps,\sqrt2-\sqrt{3/2}\}.

Since the sum of the color errors bounds the error of their sum, all intermediate packet sums then have squared norm less than 2. This supplies the mass bound used above at every step, with room to spare. Smooth map and inverse errors can likewise be apportioned among the finitely many blocks and, after n is chosen in a block, among its 2n+1 passages. Choosing a basic neighborhood specified by finitely many smooth norms inside the requested neighborhood makes this allocation explicit. Every passage may also make the new excluded arc arbitrarily small; apply this in particular at the last passage.

Set \nu\le\delta^2 in each block. Start with A_0=0, and let A_{k+1}=A_k+D_{k+1} after block k+1. At the beginning of each new block choose a new q from that block’s actual input densities. That q is then held fixed throughout its block. The band function, sieve modulus, strength, and length may all change from block to block. The estimates depend only on |b_r|\le1, |q|\le2, the mass bound 2, and (4.7); they require no uniform lower bound for the strengths and no uniform derivative bound for the successive centering functions.

After K blocks, telescoping (4.16) and (4.20) gives

\begin{align*} \int_\T\sqrt{p^{(K)}}\,\dd z &\ge\int_\T\sqrt{p^{(0)}}\,\dd z-400K\delta^2, \tag{4.21}\\ \sum_r\int_\T p_r^{(K)} |A_K/K-b_r|^2\,\dd z &\le\frac5{K\delta}. \tag{4.22}\end{align*}

For the second estimate the initial error is zero, and 4/\delta+\delta^2\le5/\delta. Given the desired prediction tolerance \eps, first choose \delta>0 sufficiently small and then put

K=\left\lceil\frac{10}{\eps^2\delta}\right\rceil.

We can require simultaneously \delta\le1/100 and

400\left(\frac{10\delta}{\eps^2}+\delta^2\right)<\tau.

Then K\delta is large enough for (4.22), and K\delta^2 is small enough for (4.21). These choices precede all blocks and do not depend on their future strengths or lengths.

Set \Psi=A_K/K. Disjoint angular-index supports make all different color cyclic subspaces orthogonal, so the spectral density formula gives exactly

\left\|\sum_r b_rF_r^{(K)}- \Psi(U_{S^{(K)}})\sum_rF_r^{(K)}\right\|_2^2 =\sum_r\int_\T p_r^{(K)}|b_r-\Psi|^2\,\dd z.

This proves the required norm estimate. Every D in (4.18) is smooth and has conjugation symmetry, hence so does \Psi. Restoring the original scale of the tags proves the proposition in its stated form.

5 Preparation, whitening, and the smooth limit

The finite prediction result encodes a target observable in a packet sum while retaining nearly flat total spectral density. We prepare arbitrary observables for that result, whiten the resulting vector to exactly flat density, and diagonalize the stages to obtain a smooth map whose one orbit is complete.

All vector comparisons in this section take place in the fixed physical space L^2(\T^3), even when intermediate coordinates change. A neighborhood of a diffeomorphism will mean a neighborhood of the pair consisting of the map and its inverse in the C^\infty topology. For a unitary U, write

\calC(U,f)=\overline{\operatorname{span}\{U^nf:n\in\Z\}}.

We use the packet spectral calculus from Section 2: for a measurable function \alpha of the additive spectral variable z, the coefficient of \alpha(U_S)F at angular index m is \alpha(m\phi(u)\bmod1)A_m(u,a). The notation is used only when the resulting vector has finite L^2 norm.

Lemma 5.1 (A flat vector). For every intermediate twist and every good arc I, there is a real centered vector v of spectral density 1, using two nonzero angular indices and coefficients supported in a compact subinterval of I.

Proof. Choose a positive integer m and u_0<u_1 in I such that m(\phi(u_1)-\phi(u_0))=1. This is possible by first choosing a compact interval on which \phi increases and then making m large. Put

A(u)=\1_{[u_0,u_1]}(u) \sqrt{\frac{|m\phi'(u)|}{2}}, \qquad v(\theta,u,a)=A(u)\ee(m\theta)+A(u)\ee(-m\theta).

The pushforward of |A(u)|^2\dd u\,\dd a by each of \pm m\phi(u) modulo one is \tfrac12\dd z. The two angular modes are orthogonal, so the spectral density of v is 1. The vector is real and centered. Its endpoint discontinuities are harmless: no smoothness is required of the vector.

We call a pair (S,f) admissible if S is an intermediate twist in smooth volume-preserving coordinates, with good arc I, and f is real, has spectral density 1, and has finitely many nonzero angular modes with L^2 coefficients supported in a compact subset of I\times\T. In particular, f is centered and has norm one.

Proposition 5.2 (One stage). Let (S,f) be admissible, let h be a real smooth function in physical coordinates with \int h=0 and \|h\|_\infty\le1, and let \eta,\rho,\tau>0. In every prescribed neighborhood of S there is an admissible pair (S',f'), with good arc I', and a finite Laurent polynomial P such that

\|f'-f\|_2<\tau,\qquad |\T\setminus I'|<\rho,\qquad \|h-P(U_{S'})f'\|_2 <|\T\setminus I|^{1/2}+\eta. \tag{5.1}

Proof. We first prepare smooth packets for f and h, then put constant tags on disjoint packets, and finally use Proposition 4.1. Every accuracy appearing below may be made arbitrarily small after the finite data on which it depends have been fixed.

At a fixed map we use the density estimate (2.4), which also applies to the nonsmooth L^2 coefficients of an admissible vector. Across a passage, density preservation instead comes from Lemma 2.4.

Converting the angular averages. In the current coordinates write

h=h_\perp+g(u,a),\qquad g_0(a)=\int_\T g(u,a)\dd u,\qquad r(u,a)=g(u,a)-g_0(a).

Here h_\perp has zero \theta-average, r has zero u-average for each a, and \int g_0=0. Fourier truncation and smoothing on the good arc give a real smooth packet sum F arbitrarily close to f. By (2.4), its density is arbitrarily close to 1 in L^1.

Let \beta=|\T\setminus I|. Fiberwise Parseval gives

\int_\T|h_\perp(\theta,u,a)|^2\dd\theta \le \int_\T|h(\theta,u,a)|^2\dd\theta\le1.

Thus cutting h_\perp off smoothly inside I, and then retaining finitely many of its nonzero angular modes, loses at most \sqrt\beta+\eps in norm, for arbitrary \eps>0. For example, the cutoff may be chosen with \int_\T(1-\chi)^2\dd u<\beta+\eps^2. Denote the resulting packet sum by H_\perp. The simultaneous-list version of Lemma 2.4, stated in Remark 2.5, transports the F and H_\perp lists through a common passage even when their supports overlap. We require density preservation only for the F list; no orthogonality between the two lists is asserted.

The next passage turns variation in the old u coordinate into nonzero angular modes; the passage after it does the same for the old a coordinate. There are two remaining terms, and neither will be discarded. Before the first passage integer N_1 is chosen, fix a finite nonzero u-Fourier truncation r_K of r. Choose the new good arc in the a variable and its smooth cutoff \chi_1(a) so that replacing r_K by \chi_1r_K costs arbitrarily little. These are fixed functions of the old slow variables. The cutoff can simultaneously lose arbitrarily little mass from the finitely many existing packets. Choose the broad neutral jitter and then N_1, as in Lemma 2.4. In the new coordinates

(u,a,b),\qquad b=\theta-H_1(u),

the function \chi_1(a)r_K(u,a) is already a finite sum of nonzero angular modes supported in the new good arc. The former packets are transported with arbitrarily small norm error, and the density of the F packets changes by arbitrarily little in L^1. Choose N_1 also so that every retained transported old index lies outside [-K,K]: its quotient by N_1 stays in a fixed compact set away from zero. This keeps the added modes of r_K disjoint in angular index from the transported test packets. The function g_0(a) has been left entirely untouched.

Now fix a finite nonzero a-Fourier truncation (g_0)_L of g_0. It has no constant term because \int g_0=0. Apply a second neutral passage to all existing packets. Its new coordinates are

(a,b,d),\qquad d=u-H_2(a).

Choose its good arc and cutoff \chi_2(b) before its final integer N_2. The term \chi_2(b)(g_0)_L(a) is now a smooth packet sum in nonzero angular modes. Its cutoff loses arbitrarily little norm and cannot introduce an angular constant. Choose N_2 also so that the transported indices lie outside [-L,L], keeping the newly added modes disjoint from them. The existing packets are transported with arbitrarily small norm and density errors.

Relabel the coordinates of the resulting twist as (\theta,u,a). For every \eps>0 the above choices therefore give real smooth packet sums F,H such that

\|F-f\|_2<\eps,\qquad \|H-h\|_2<\sqrt\beta+\eps,\qquad \|p_F-1\|_1<\eps. \tag{5.2}

The functions that needed new cutoffs were fixed before the relevant passage integer was chosen. In particular, this argument has not assumed uniform control of coefficients arising only after that choice.

Constant ratios on rectangles. Enlarge the finite angular index list so that it contains the modes of both F and H, and write their coefficients as F_m,H_m. For almost every sufficiently small real t,

\int_{\{F_m+tH_m=0\}}|H_m|^2\dd u\,\dd a=0 \quad\hbox{for every }m. \tag{5.3}

To see this, at a point where H_m\ne0 at most one real t solves F_m+tH_m=0; Fubini applied to |H_m|^2\dd u\,\dd a\,\dd t proves the assertion. There are only finitely many indices. Replace F by F+tH with such a sufficiently small real t. Its norm and density changes are arbitrarily small by (2.4), and reality is preserved.

Define R_m=H_m/F_m where F_m\ne0, and zero otherwise. In view of (5.3), H_m=R_mF_m almost everywhere. With \dd\nu_m=|F_m|^2\dd u\,\dd a, one has \int|R_m|^2\dd\nu_m=\|H_m\|_2^2. Truncating R_m to a bounded function therefore changes R_mF_m arbitrarily little in L^2. Finite rectangular step functions are dense in L^2(\nu_m): continuous functions are dense for this finite measure, and uniform continuity approximates a continuous function by a fine rectangular grid. Grid boundaries have \nu_m-measure zero, since \nu_m is absolutely continuous.

Approximate each bounded ratio by such a step function, and replace the indicators of the finitely many grid rectangles by smooth interior cutoffs. Trim enough to obtain positive gaps between distinct retained rectangles, but lose arbitrarily little in both the F norm and the tagged norm. This is possible after the finitely many step values are known. Where a ratio has been truncated, a zero step value is allowed; we do not need to remove the corresponding F mass. Performing the construction at positive indices and reflecting it at negative indices gives packets F_r and constants b_r with conjugate symmetry, such that

F^{\mathrm{tag}}=\sum_r F_r\quad\hbox{approximates }f, \qquad H^{\mathrm{tag}}=\sum_r b_rF_r\quad\hbox{approximates }h

with the errors in (5.2), up to arbitrarily small additions. Different rectangles in (m,u,a) are disjoint with gaps; each is its own color. The density of F^{\mathrm{tag}} remains arbitrarily close to 1 in L^1. The number

M=\max\bigl(1,\max_r|b_r|\bigr)

is finite. All subsequent approximation errors for tagged vectors are chosen after M is known.

Separation by angular index alone. Two further neutral passages supply exactly the hypotheses of Proposition 4.1. Here are the support details. Write the single old angular index of rectangle r as m_r, and its compact coefficient support as K_r. Choose c so that different m_r have separated ranges, and form

E_r=\{(m_r(c+\phi(u)),a):(u,a)\in K_r\}.

The compact sets E_r are pairwise disjoint: for a fixed m_r the map (u,a)\mapsto(m_r(c+\phi(u)),a) is injective, and different indices were separated by c. Choose smooth cutoffs \xi_r(s,a) supported in disjoint neighborhoods of these sets and equal to one near them. On the first passage retain the exact coefficients

C_{j,r}(a)=\chi(a)\xi_r(j/N,a) \int_\T A_r(u,a)\ee(m_rH(u)-ju)\dd u. \tag{5.4}

Here \chi is the new good-arc cutoff; its loss was made small before choosing the broad neutral jitter and N. Lemma 2.1 shows that the support restrictions delete arbitrarily little norm as N increases. There are finitely many retained j, all nonzero. In coordinates (u,a,b) the resulting packets are

C_{j,r}(a)\ee(ju)\ee(m_rb).

Their moduli are independent of the new spare coordinate b. Different old indices cannot share j; at a shared j, distinct colors have disjoint compact a supports with positive gaps.

Fix this finite output before making the second passage. Choose its c_2 to separate the ranges belonging to distinct j. For each fixed j, strict monotonicity of the current speed \sigma on its good arc makes the compact sets

Q_{j,r}=\{j(c_2+\sigma(a)):a\in\supp C_{j,r}\}

disjoint as r varies. Thus all nonempty Q_{j,r} have disjoint open neighborhoods. Restrict the second-passage coefficient at new index k by a smooth cutoff of k/N_2 supported in its designated neighborhood and equal to one near Q_{j,r}. Taking N_2 last makes the deleted norm arbitrarily small, while the retained finite k-index sets are exactly disjoint for distinct pairs (j,r). An individual output term has the form

B_{k,j,r}(b)\ee(ka)\ee(jd),\qquad d=u-H_2(a),

so its modulus is independent of the final spare coordinate d. No interference can spoil this property, because different pairs have disjoint final index sets.

Every integral and cutoff used here commutes with the constant tag b_r. Consequently, if the sum of the individual color transport errors is less than \varepsilon/(1+M), both the untagged and the tagged physical errors are less than \varepsilon. Neutral density preservation and (2.4) keep the total density arbitrarily close to 1. At this point the packet colors are disjoint in angular indices, their moduli are independent of the spare coordinate, and their mass can be required to be at most 3/2.

Prediction and whitening. Apply Proposition 4.1 to the tags b_r/M, with prediction tolerance divided by M. Its physical transport errors are likewise chosen with the factor M included. Write G for the final real packet sum, p for its density, and D(U)G for the resulting approximation to the tagged vector, with the factor M restored. Here U is the Koopman operator of the final intermediate map. We can ensure

\|G-f\|_2\longrightarrow0, \qquad \|h-D(U)G\|_2<\sqrt\beta+\eta/2, \qquad \int_\T\sqrt p\,\dd z\longrightarrow1 \tag{5.5}

as the preparation and prediction tolerances tend to zero. For the last assertion, if the input density is p_0, then

\left|\int\sqrt{p_0}-1\right| \le\|\sqrt{p_0}-1\|_2 \le\|p_0-1\|_1^{1/2},

and Proposition 4.1 gives an arbitrarily small loss in \int\sqrt p. Its upper limit is at most one by \int\sqrt p\le\|G\|_2 and \|G-f\|_2\to0.

Reality implies p(-z)=p(z) almost everywhere. Set E=\{p=0\}, choose the flat real vector v of Lemma 5.1 for this last map, and define

f'=\left(\frac{\1_{E^c}}{\sqrt p}\right)(U)G+\1_E(U)v. \tag{5.6}

The first term is well defined in L^2, with squared norm |E^c|. The terms have disjoint spectral supports and densities \1_{E^c} and \1_E, respectively. Indeed, \1_E(U)G=0, even if v uses some of the same angular modes. The total density of f' is exactly one. Both multipliers preserve reality, nonzero angular indices, and compact support in the good arc. Hence the resulting pair is admissible. Directly, including the contribution from E,

\|f'-G\|_2^2 =\int_\T(\sqrt p-1)^2\dd z =\|G\|_2^2+1-2\int_\T\sqrt p\,\dd z. \tag{5.7}

This tends to zero by (5.5), and therefore \|f'-f\|_2 can be made less than the independently specified \tau.

Whitening also preserves the prediction. In the measurable spectral calculus,

G=(\sqrt p)(U)f',\qquad D(U)G=(D\sqrt p)(U)f'.

Since f' has density one and D(U)G\in L^2, the function D\sqrt p belongs to L^2(\T,\dd z). Trigonometric polynomials are dense in this space, so D(U)G belongs to \calC(U,f') and is approximated by a finite Laurent polynomial in U applied to f'. Choose that approximation with error less than \eta/2. This proves the last inequality in (5.1); it asserts an approximation to h, not exact membership of h at this finite stage.

Finally, each neutral passage and Proposition 4.1 allows an arbitrarily small physical perturbation of both map and inverse. There are finitely many such operations here, so they can all be kept in the prescribed neighborhood. The last new good arc may have complement less than \rho. All choices of small physical errors are made after the finite tags, cutoffs, and coordinate changes that affect their bounds have been fixed. Thus neither large tags nor large derivatives of an earlier coordinate change obstruct the arbitrary closeness claimed in the proposition.

Proof of Theorem 1.1. Choose a smooth periodic speed \phi_0 which agrees with an increasing affine function on a nonempty closed interval inside (0,1), and let I_0 be an open subinterval where \phi_0'>0. Start with the twist S_0 and its flat vector f_0 from Lemma 5.1. Choose a countable family of real smooth centered functions, bounded by one, whose real linear span is dense in real L^2_0(\T^3); the physical torus sines and cosines will do. List them as (h_n)_{n\ge1} so that each occurs infinitely often.

We record the continuity needed to retain approximations. If volume-preserving maps T_i and their inverses converge uniformly to T and T^{-1}, then for every fixed k\in\Z,

U_{T_i}^kg\longrightarrow U_T^kg\quad\hbox{in }L^2 \quad(g\in L^2). \tag{5.8}

Uniform convergence of the corresponding fixed iterates follows by composition on the compact torus. For continuous g this proves uniform convergence of the compositions; for general g, approximation by continuous functions and unitarity prove (5.8). Consequently, for every fixed Laurent polynomial P the map

(T,g)\longmapsto P(U_T)g

is continuous into physical L^2 when maps and inverses have the C^\infty topology and vectors have the L^2 topology. Explicitly, if P(w)=\sum_k c_kw^k, its difference is bounded by

\sum_k|c_k|\|g_i-g\|_2+ \sum_k|c_k|\|U_{T_i}^kg-U_T^kg\|_2.

Inductively apply Proposition 5.2 with h=h_n and \eta=2^{-n}, obtaining (S_n,f_n), a good arc I_n, and a finite Laurent polynomial P_n, such that

|\T\setminus I_n|<4^{-n},\qquad \|h_n-P_n(U_{S_n})f_n\|_2 <|\T\setminus I_{n-1}|^{1/2}+2^{-n}. \tag{5.9}

Use the arbitrary closeness in that proposition also to impose

\|f_n-f_{n-1}\|_2<2^{-n}, \qquad d_k(S_n,S_{n-1})+d_k(S_n^{-1},S_{n-1}^{-1})<2^{-n} \quad(0\le k\le n),

where d_k are ambient C^k sup-norm distances induced by a fixed smooth embedding of the torus. At the same time impose the finitely many open conditions

\|P_j(U_{S_n})f_n-P_j(U_{S_{n-1}})f_{n-1}\|_2<2^{-n} \qquad(1\le j<n). \tag{5.10}

Their compatibility follows from the continuity just proved. No bound uniform in j on the degrees or coefficients of P_j is required.

For each fixed k, the map and inverse sequences have summable tails in C^k. They therefore converge smoothly to maps T and R. Uniform convergence, compactness, and S_nS_n^{-1}=S_n^{-1}S_n=\operatorname{id} give TR=RT=\operatorname{id}, so T is a smooth diffeomorphism with smooth inverse. For every continuous g,

\int g\circ T=\lim_n\int g\circ S_n=\int g,

so normalized volume is invariant. The vectors f_n converge in L^2 to a real centered vector f.

Every completed stage has density exactly one. Combining (5.8) with f_n\to f, for all r,s\in\Z we obtain

\langle U_T^rf,U_T^sf\rangle =\lim_n\langle U_{S_n}^rf_n,U_{S_n}^sf_n\rangle =\delta_{rs}. \tag{5.11}

The retained finite polynomials give, for every j,

\|h_j-P_j(U_T)f\|_2 \le |\T\setminus I_{j-1}|^{1/2}+2^{-j} +\sum_{n>j}2^{-n} =|\T\setminus I_{j-1}|^{1/2}+2^{1-j}.

Along the infinitely many occurrences of any fixed test the right side tends to zero. Hence every test belongs to \calC(U_T,f). Their complex linear span is dense in complex L^2_0(\T^3), whereas every orbit vector is centered. Thus

\calC(U_T,f)=L^2_0(\T^3).

Together with (5.11), this says that the bilateral orbit of f is an orthonormal basis of the entire centered space. With w=\ee(z), the assignment U_T^nf\mapsto w^n extends to a unitary map onto L^2(S^1,m) intertwining U_T with multiplication by w.

Multiplication by w has no nonzero invariant vector, since (w-1)g(w)=0 forces g=0 almost everywhere. Consequently every T-invariant L^2 function is constant, which proves ergodicity. The manifold \T^3 is compact, connected, smooth, and without boundary, and its normalized flat volume has strictly positive smooth density. These are all the properties required in Theorem 1.1.

6 Dynamical consequences

The spectral model gives ordinary mixing directly. The passage to higher orders uses the separate multiple-mixing theorem; the entropy and Lyapunov conclusions do not depend on that additional input.

Corollary 6.1. For the diffeomorphism T and normalized standard volume \mu of Theorem 1.1, every integer k\ge2 and every fixed choice of measurable sets A_1,\ldots,A_k\subseteq\T^3 satisfy

\mu\left(\bigcap_{i=1}^k T^{-t_i}A_i\right) \longrightarrow\prod_{i=1}^k\mu(A_i)

whenever t_1<\cdots<t_k are integers and \min_{1\le i<k}(t_{i+1}-t_i)\to\infty. Moreover, the Kolmogorov–Sinai entropy satisfies h_\mu(T)=0, and all three Lyapunov exponents of T, counted with multiplicity, vanish at \mu-almost every point.

Proof. Let V:L^2_0(\T^3,\mu)\to L^2(S^1,m) be the unitary spectral model in Theorem 1.1. For a,b\in L^2_0(\T^3,\mu),

\int_{\T^3}(a\circ T^n)\overline b\dd\mu =\int_{S^1}w^n(Va)(w)\overline{(Vb)(w)}\dd m(w) \longrightarrow0\qquad(|n|\to\infty).

Indeed, (Va)\overline{Vb}\in L^1(m) by Cauchy–Schwarz, so the limit is the Riemann–Lebesgue lemma. Taking centered indicators gives ordinary mixing. The map T is an invertible probability-preserving transformation with measurable inverse, so the multiple-mixing theorem [11, Theorem 1.1] gives every order k\ge3. Invariance shifts t_1 to zero and identifies its positive time gaps with t_{i+1}-t_i; the case k=2 is ordinary mixing.

The full Koopman operator is the direct sum of the one-dimensional constants and the simple Lebesgue model on all of L^2_0, and hence has finite spectral multiplicity. Normalized torus volume is a Lebesgue probability space, and T is a measure-preserving automorphism. Rokhlin’s finite-multiplicity entropy theorem [14, §7, p. 13] therefore gives h_\mu(T)=0.

The derivative and inverse derivative are bounded on the compact torus, so the invertible Oseledets integrability conditions hold. Write \lambda_1(x),\lambda_2(x),\lambda_3(x) for the exponents repeated according to multiplicity at regular points. Pesin’s entropy formula, as stated and reproved by Mañé [9, p. 95, equation (2)], applies to the C^\infty diffeomorphism and its absolutely continuous invariant probability \mu. Thus

0=h_\mu(T)=\int_{\T^3}\sum_{i=1}^3\max\{\lambda_i(x),0\}\dd\mu(x).

The nonnegative integrand vanishes almost everywhere, so every exponent is nonpositive there. Preservation of standard volume gives |\det DT_x|=1, and at every Oseledets-regular point

\sum_{i=1}^3\lambda_i(x) =\lim_{n\to\infty}\frac1n\log|\det D(T^n)_x|=0.

The three nonpositive exponents must therefore all be zero at \mu-almost every point.

References

  1. [1]Fatna Abdedou, Bassam Fayad, and Arezki Kessi. Analytic reparametrizations of translation toral flows with countable Lebesgue spectrum. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 43(10):3706–3727, 2023. doi:10.3934/dcds.2023063.
  2. [2]D. V. Anosov and A. B. Katok. New examples in smooth ergodic theory. Ergodic diffeomorphisms. Trudy Moskovskogo Matematicheskogo Obshchestva, 23:3–36, 1970. English translation: Transactions of the Moscow Mathematical Society 23 (1970), 1–35. https://www.mathnet.ru/eng/mmo237.
  3. [3]el Houcein el Abdalaoui. Spectral ergodic Banach problem and flat polynomials. arXiv:1508.06439v8, 2023. Preprint; first posted 2015, version 8 dated 19 June 2023. https://arxiv.org/abs/1508.06439v8.
  4. [4]Bassam Fayad, Giovanni Forni, and Adam Kanigowski. Lebesgue spectrum of countable multiplicity for conservative flows on the torus. Journal of the American Mathematical Society, 34(3):747–813, 2021. doi:10.1090/jams/970.
  5. [5]Bassam R. Fayad. Partially mixing and locally rank one smooth transformations and flows on the torus \mathbb T^d, d\ge3. Journal of the London Mathematical Society, 64(3):637–654, 2001. doi:10.1112/S0024610701002447.
  6. [6]Mélanie Guenais. Morse cocycles and simple Lebesgue spectrum. Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems, 19(2):437–446, 1999. doi:10.1017/S0143385799126579.
  7. [7]Henry Helson and William Parry. Cocycles and spectra. Arkiv för Matematik, 16:195–206, 1978. doi:10.1007/BF02385994.
  8. [8]Lars Hörmander. The Analysis of Linear Partial Differential Operators I: Distribution Theory and Fourier Analysis. Classics in Mathematics, Springer, Second edition, 2003. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-61497-2.
  9. [9]Ricardo Mañé. A proof of Pesin’s formula. Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems, 1:95–102, 1981. Errata: Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems 3(1) (1983), 159–160, doi:10.1017/S0143385700001863. doi:10.1017/S0143385700001188.
  10. [10]J. Mathew and M. G. Nadkarni. A measure preserving transformation whose spectrum has Lebesgue component of multiplicity two. Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society, 16(4):402–406, 1984. doi:10.1112/blms/16.4.402.
  11. [11]OpenAI. Rokhlin’s multiple-mixing problem for one transformation. OpenAI Math Release preprint PDF, 2026. Reading view on this site: Rokhlin’s multiple-mixing problem for one transformation.
  12. [12]A. A. Prikhod'ko. On ergodic flows with simple Lebesgue spectrum. Sbornik: Mathematics, 211(4):594–615, 2020. doi:10.1070/SM8147.
  13. [13]V. A. Rokhlin. Selected topics from the metric theory of dynamical systems. Uspekhi Matematicheskikh Nauk, 4(2(30)):57–128, 1949. In Russian; see §4, no. 7, p. 107. English translation in American Mathematical Society Translations, Series 2, 49 (1966), 171–240. https://www.mathnet.ru/eng/rm8607.
  14. [14]V. A. Rokhlin. New progress in the theory of transformations with invariant measure. Russian Mathematical Surveys, 15(4):1–22, 1960. https://www.mathnet.ru/eng/rm6735.
  15. [15]S. M. Ulam. A Collection of Mathematical Problems. Interscience Tracts in Pure and Applied Mathematics 8, Interscience Publishers, 1960. §6, p. 76.