Plectis Atlas
Search

↑ and ↓ move, Enter opens, Esc closes.

The critical dimension for the one-phase Bernoulli problem

OpenAI groups related papers into a “family”. OpenAI’s catalogue describes this one:

Establishes seven as the first dimension admitting a nonflat, one-homogeneous global minimizer of the one-phase Bernoulli energy. Consequently, minimizing free boundaries are smooth through dimension six, and their singular sets have dimension at most \(n-7\) in higher dimensions. (OpenAI’s Lean note)

Lean is a language for mathematical statements and proofs that a computer can verify. The assessments below ask whether those statements express the result OpenAI describes here.

The independent assessments find that the Lean statements express only part of the result described above, or a narrower statement. Read the assessments

What the papers state

Corollary 1.2 (Sharp singular-set bound)

In The critical dimension for one-phase Bernoulli minimizers, 24 September 2026

Possible match to OpenAI’s description, selected because it shares the most wording. No review confirming the selection is recorded.

Let n\ge2, let D\subset\R^n be open, and let u\in H^1_{\mathrm{loc}}(D) be a nonnegative local minimizer of the one-phase Bernoulli energy in D. Its interior free boundary is smooth outside \operatorname{Sing}(u). This set is empty when n\le6, is locally finite when n=7, and satisfies

\dim_{\mathrm H}\operatorname{Sing}(u)\le n-7\qquad(n\ge7).

For every n\ge7, a global minimizer attains this dimension bound.

No Lean statement in the release is paired with this theorem.

The release does not say which paper theorem its catalogue describes. Both statements above are shown whole: the paper’s main theorem first, then the statement that shares the most wording with the description. The atlas has not reviewed either choice.

Reported proof verification
One Lean statement in the release; two independent groups report that Comparator accepted runs for this file at the version shown here.

Papers

Each paper opens as a reading page in the browser, with the PDF beside it. The statements each paper opens with are on its reading page.

The critical dimension for one-phase Bernoulli minimizers

24 September 2026, current edition.

Read it herePDF

We prove that seven is the critical dimension for the one-phase Bernoulli problem: every nonzero one-homogeneous global minimizer in dimensions at most six is flat, while a nonflat one-homogeneous global minimizer exists in dimension seven. It follows that the interior free boundary of a local minimizer is smooth in dimensions at most six. In dimension n ≥ 7, its singular set has Hausdorff dimension at most \(n-7\), and this bound is sharp. In dimension seven, the singular set is locally finite.

One Lean statement in this family

Lean is a language for mathematical statements and proofs that a computer can verify. The Lean statement below is shown beside its possible paper counterpart, with the reason they were linked.

For a configured theorem, the Comparator program tests whether OpenAI’s separate proof proves the exact Lean statement using only the allowed axioms. Some statement files instead configure definitions for comparison by name and type. Acceptance does not establish that a formal statement means the same thing as the paper’s theorem.

BernoulliNonflatInSeven

The paper states

The words they share: flat, energy, nonzero, nonflat, homogeneous, minimizer, one, global, bernoulli.

Possible Lean counterpart

Selected from shared wording. No review of whether the statements mean the same thing is recorded.

A nonflat one-homogeneous Bernoulli minimizer in dimension seven

BernoulliNonflatInSeven.lean, the release lists it as a supporting statement.

theorem nonflat_in_seven : ∃ u : Space 7 → ℝ,    GlobalMinimizer u ∧ Nonzero u ∧ OneHomogeneous u ∧ ¬ Flat u := by  sorry

This file states the theorem with sorry, a placeholder, in place of its proof. OpenAI supplies a separate proof file. Comparator tests whether that proof proves the statement here.

two independent groups report that Comparator accepted runs for this Lean statement file: cert-machine; MathVet. Who ran the proof-verification program

  • cert-machine records it as “CERTIFIED”.
  • MathVet records it as “comparator-sandboxed-pass”.

Read the complete Lean statement

Other mathematical statements in OpenAI’s Lean library

Atlas found these propositions by scanning the text of the project’s Model.lean file. Each name links to its definition, with any associated statement file beside it. This list does not record running Lean to interpret or verify those definitions.

Independent comparisons and proof-verification reports

Does the Lean express the advertised result?

Neither group finds that the Lean statements express or imply the whole advertised result. They describe what the statements express in different terms.

MathVet and Carlos Toledo’s cert-machine independently assessed whether this family’s Lean statements express the whole result OpenAI describes in its catalogue. These are assessments of the family as a whole, not of each paper theorem separately.

MathVet finds that the Lean statements express part of the advertised result (their term: “partial”).

Their note: nonflat_in_seven: there is u : ℝ⁷ → ℝ that is a nonnegative global minimizer of ∫ |∇u|² + 1_{u>0} (ballwise comparison with H¹ competitors agreeing on the boundary, all balls), nonzero, 1-homogeneous and not a half-space solution max(x·e,0): the existence half of ‘seven is the first dimension’. The other half (flatness of such minimizers in dimensions ≤ 6) and the consequences (smooth free boundaries through dimension six, singular set dimension ≤ n-7) are not stated (docs: ‘outside this selected statement’).

Definitions the group asks readers to compare with the paper: LocalMinimizer/GlobalMinimizer written with hand-built H¹, H¹₀ (L²-approximation by compactly supported smooth functions) and the exact energy ∫ ‖G‖² + if 0 < u x then 1 else 0 with an explicit weak-gradient representative G; flatness, homogeneity and nonvanishing are a.e. statements

“partial”, in their words: Only a special case is stated, or a co-equal headline claim has no challenge statement.

Their method: An independent, model-assisted, pre-referee reading of each family’s challenge statements against its headline claim under a published rubric (PROTOCOL.md), with its own Comparator runs per challenge.

cert-machine finds that the Lean statements express a narrower statement than the advertised result (their term: “NARROWER — DECLARED”).

The gap they name: Flatness of one-homogeneous global minimizers in dimensions ≤ 6 (the ‘first’ in the headline) and the regularity and singular-set consequences.

“NARROWER — DECLARED”, in their words: The challenge statements state less than the headline, and OpenAI’s Lean note says so.

Their method: Every Comparator challenge re-run on Linux with nanoda switched on, decided by a preregistered rule.

OpenAI’s own note on what its Lean covers

The paper identifies seven as the critical dimension for nonflat one-homogeneous global minimizers of the one-phase Bernoulli problem. The linked formalization proves the existence side: in dimension seven there is a nonzero one-homogeneous global minimizer that is not a half-space solution.

The flatness classification in dimensions at most six and the resulting regularity and singular-set bounds are outside this selected statement.

AI-drafted comparisons, with no recorded human review

  • A nonflat one-homogeneous Bernoulli minimizer in dimension seven BernoulliNonflatInSeven

    Unreviewed AI draft: states part of a paper’s theorem. States the existence half of the main theorem: a nonflat one-homogeneous global minimiser in dimension seven. Flatness in dimensions at most six and the singular-set corollary are outside it.

Who ran the proof-verification program?

These groups report running Comparator with the release’s Lean statement files. For a configured theorem, it verifies OpenAI’s separate proof against the exact statement; some files instead configure definitions for comparison by name and type. Each row is the named group’s report. Atlas has not repeated the runs.

These reports do not list the software versions, proof-verification programs, axioms, time or memory in separate fields. Any such details in a report’s prose are reproduced below.

A nonflat one-homogeneous Bernoulli minimizer in dimension seven BernoulliNonflatInSeven

Two reports, all at the release’s recorded version.

Reported byTheir wordTheir accountDateOriginal report
cert-machine“CERTIFIED”Re-run through Comparator with the independent nanoda kernel switched on: Lean’s kernel and nanoda both accept OpenAI’s solution.10 October 2026Original report
MathVet“comparator-sandboxed-pass”Re-run through Comparator in a sandboxed virtual machine: accepted.8 October 2026Original report

Other proofs and exact calculations

These reports examine claims in the papers using exact calculations for finite claims, independently of the release’s Lean proofs. Read each report for the exact claim it covers.

  • Proposition 4.1 of The critical dimension for one-phase Bernoulli minimizers, 24 September 2026

    Reported by
    cert-machine
    Method
    Exact computation
    Their verdict
    “CERTIFIED” Exact code written independently from the paper confirms that the published object has the claimed property.
    What it covers
    “a finite component: the exact arithmetic of Proposition cert:universal (the universal algebraic certificate behind the flatness half, d <= 6), from Tables I and II: the interior expansion with its 1714 keys and ten printed D_0 sums, D_0 <= Dbar and the slacks giving eps_*, and the boundary expansion with its eleven coefficients giving delta_*; plus the PSD of the four projection operators. Not the graph bounds L_t (Lemmas cert:tensor-bounds, cert:graph-bound), not the geometric reduction, cutoffs or regularity theory, and not the dimension-7 example, which is cited (De Silva-Jerison 2009)”
    Original report
    Their report

What these papers cite in the release, and what cites them

These links come from the papers’ bibliographies. A citation records that one paper cites another; how each cited result is used has not been examined here.

Papers elsewhere in the release that this family’s papers cite

This family’s papers cite no paper elsewhere in the release.

Papers elsewhere in the release that cite this family’s papers

No paper elsewhere in the release cites this family’s papers.

References outside the release

Each paper’s outside references are listed with it on its reading page, where each citation is placed. Every outside work cited in the release: References outside the release

Explain a result, compare statements or propose a correction

Atlas has no contributed explanation for this family yet. You can offer one with a GitHub account. You receive named credit and disclose any AI assistance.

Each button opens a GitHub form with this page and its source version filled in. Opening the form does not reserve the work.

Offer to write an explanationCompare the Lean statement with the paperSuggest a source attributionSuggest a change

What people have said

Commentary on this family by others, dated and credited. It is commentary, not a finding.

  • An unsigned public tier list, the OpenAI Math Tier List, classes it as a proof and rates its significance, if it holds up, as “Major math journal”. The page says that nothing on it is verified.

    Author not stated. Source

Questions awaiting review

Each item identifies a statement, definition or report that needs further review. Its link opens a GitHub form with the source version already recorded.

Read the Lean statement against the paper

  • An AI agent drafted an assessment of which part of the paper this Lean statement expresses. No named human review is recorded. Open the form

Identify the theorem the catalogue describes

  • Family 367 The theorem shown was selected from shared wording with OpenAI’s description. Atlas records no review confirming that it is the theorem the description means. Open the form

Address a question raised in an independent assessment

Compare the proposed paper and Lean matches

  • Family 367 Atlas records no review of whether each linked Lean statement and paper theorem mean the same thing. Open the form