Plectis Atlas
Search

↑ and ↓ move, Enter opens, Esc closes.

Show on the map

Symplectic ball packing in higher dimensions

OpenAI groups related papers into a “family”. OpenAI’s catalogue describes this one:

Resolves the Siegel–Yao conjecture for arbitrary capacities in every dimension \(2n\ge6\). Finitely many closed symplectic balls of capacities \(R_1,\ldots,R_k\) embed disjointly into an open ball of capacity R exactly when \(\sum_iR_i^n\lt R^n\) and \(R_i+R_j\lt R\) for every distinct pair i, j. (OpenAI’s Lean note)

Lean is a language for mathematical statements and proofs that a computer can verify. The assessments below ask whether those statements express the result OpenAI describes here.

Both independent assessments find that the Lean statements express or imply the whole result described above. Read the assessments

What the papers state

The paper states

Theorem 1.1

In Symplectic Ball Packings in Higher Dimensions

Possible match to OpenAI’s description, selected from shared wording. No review confirming the selection is recorded.

Let n\ge3 and k\ge1 be integers. For positive real numbers R,R_1,\ldots,R_k, there exists a symplectic embedding

\bigsqcup_{i=1}^k B^{2n}(R_i) \hookrightarrow \Int B^{2n}(R)

if and only if

\sum_{i=1}^k R_i^n<R^n, \qquad R_i+R_j<R\quad (1\le i<j\le k).

The release does not say which paper theorem its catalogue describes. The statement above shares the most wording with the description; the atlas has not reviewed that choice. Identifying it is listed under Questions awaiting review.

Reported proof verification
Two Lean statements in the release; independent groups report that Comparator accepted runs for all these files at the version shown here.

Papers

Each paper opens as a reading page in the browser, with the PDF beside it. The statements each paper opens with are on its reading page.

Symplectic Ball Packings in Higher Dimensions

Undated, current edition.

Read it herePDF

We prove that, for all integers n ≥ 3 and k ≥ 1 and all positive real capacities \(R_1,\ldots,R_k\), the closed standard symplectic \(2n\)-balls of these capacities embed disjointly into the interior of a ball of capacity R > 0 if and only if \(\displaystyle \sum_{i=1}^k R_i^n\lt R^n, \qquad R_i+R_j\lt R\quad(i\ne j).\) Capacity is π times the squared Euclidean radius, and each embedding is defined on a neighborhood of its closed source ball. This proves Siegel and Yao’s Conjecture A.

Two Lean statements in this family

Choose one to see it beside the paper theorem it is paired with.

For a configured theorem, the Comparator program tests whether OpenAI’s separate proof proves the exact Lean statement using only the allowed axioms. Some statement files instead configure definitions for comparison by name and type. Acceptance does not establish that a formal statement means the same thing as the paper’s theorem.

BallPacking

The paper states

Theorem 1.1

In Symplectic Ball Packings in Higher Dimensions

Let n\ge3 and k\ge1 be integers. For positive real numbers R,R_1,\ldots,R_k, there exists a symplectic embedding

\bigsqcup_{i=1}^k B^{2n}(R_i) \hookrightarrow \Int B^{2n}(R)

if and only if

\sum_{i=1}^k R_i^n<R^n, \qquad R_i+R_j<R\quad (1\le i<j\le k).

The words they share: integers, real, symplectic, embedding, packings, ball, positive.

Possible Lean counterpart

Selected from shared wording. No review of whether the statements mean the same thing is recorded.

Exact criterion for higher-dimensional symplectic ball packings

BallPacking.lean, the release lists it as a supporting statement.

theorem main_theorem (n k : ℕ) (hn : 3 ≤ n) (hk : 1 ≤ k)    (R : ℝ) (r : Fin k → ℝ) (hR : 0 < R) (hr : ∀ i, 0 < r i) :    HasPacking n k R r ↔ PackingInequalities n k R r := by  sorry

This file states the theorem with sorry, a placeholder, in place of its proof. OpenAI supplies a separate proof file. Comparator tests whether that proof proves the statement here.

two independent groups report that Comparator accepted runs for this Lean statement file: cert-machine; MathVet. Who ran the proof-verification program

  • cert-machine records it as “CERTIFIED”.
  • MathVet records it as “comparator-sandboxed-pass”.

Read the complete Lean statement

BallPackingNecessity

The paper states

Theorem 1.1

In Symplectic Ball Packings in Higher Dimensions

Let n\ge3 and k\ge1 be integers. For positive real numbers R,R_1,\ldots,R_k, there exists a symplectic embedding

\bigsqcup_{i=1}^k B^{2n}(R_i) \hookrightarrow \Int B^{2n}(R)

if and only if

\sum_{i=1}^k R_i^n<R^n, \qquad R_i+R_j<R\quad (1\le i<j\le k).

The words they share: integers, real, symplectic, embedding, packings, ball.

Possible Lean counterpart

Selected from shared wording. No review of whether the statements mean the same thing is recorded.

Necessity of the volume and pairwise capacity inequalities

BallPackingNecessity.lean, the release lists it as a supporting statement.

theorem packing_necessity (n k : ℕ) (hn : 3 ≤ n) (hk : 1 ≤ k)    (R : ℝ) (r : Fin k → ℝ) (hR : 0 < R) (hr : ∀ i, 0 < r i)    (hp : HasPacking n k R r) : PackingInequalities n k R r := by  sorry

This file states the theorem with sorry, a placeholder, in place of its proof. OpenAI supplies a separate proof file. Comparator tests whether that proof proves the statement here.

two independent groups report that Comparator accepted runs for this Lean statement file: cert-machine; MathVet. Who ran the proof-verification program

  • cert-machine records it as “CERTIFIED”.
  • MathVet records it as “comparator-sandboxed-pass”.

Read the complete Lean statement

Independent comparisons and proof-verification reports

Does the Lean express the advertised result?

MathVet and cert-machine agree on how much of the advertised result the Lean statements express.

MathVet and Carlos Toledo’s cert-machine independently assessed whether this family’s Lean statements express the whole result OpenAI describes in its catalogue. These are assessments of the family as a whole, not of each paper theorem separately.

MathVet finds that the Lean statements express or imply the whole advertised result (their term: “full”).

Their note: main_theorem (n ≥ 3, k ≥ 1, R, r_i > 0): HasPacking n k R r ↔ (∑ r_i^n < R^n ∧ ∀ i≠j, r_i + r_j < R), where a packing is k disjointly-imaged smooth symplectic embeddings (defined on open neighbourhoods of the closed capacity-r_i balls in ℂⁿ with the standard form, capacity π|z|²) into the open ball of capacity R; BallPackingNecessity repeats the forward direction.

“full”, in their words: The challenge statements imply the headline claim after unpacking definitions or one routine step.

Their method: An independent, model-assisted, pre-referee reading of each family’s challenge statements against its headline claim under a published rubric (PROTOCOL.md), with its own Comparator runs per challenge.

cert-machine finds that the Lean statements express or imply the whole advertised result (their term: “MATCHES”).

“MATCHES”, in their words: The challenge statements state the headline as OpenAI wrote it.

Their method: Every Comparator challenge re-run on Linux with nanoda switched on, decided by a preregistered rule.

OpenAI’s own note on what its Lean covers

The formalization proves Siegel and Yao’s ball-packing criterion in every symplectic dimension $2n$ with $n\ge3$. For $k\ge1$ closed standard balls of positive capacities $R_1,\ldots,R_k$, disjoint symplectic embeddings into the interior of a ball of capacity $R$ exist exactly when $\sum_i R_i^n<R^n$ and $R_i+R_j<R$ for all $i\ne j$. Capacity is $\pi$ times squared Euclidean radius, and each embedding is defined on a neighborhood of its closed source ball. The linked statements include both the full equivalence and the necessity direction.

AI-drafted comparisons, with no recorded human review

  • Exact criterion for higher-dimensional symplectic ball packings BallPacking

    Unreviewed AI draft: states a paper’s theorem as the paper does. States the main theorem: in dimension 2n ≥ 6, balls pack symplectically into a ball exactly when the volume and pairwise capacity inequalities hold.

  • Necessity of the volume and pairwise capacity inequalities BallPackingNecessity

    Unreviewed AI draft: states part of a paper’s theorem. States only the necessity direction of the packing criterion (a packing forces the volume and pairwise inequalities); the sufficiency direction is in BallPacking.

Who ran the proof-verification program?

These groups report running Comparator with the release’s Lean statement files. For a configured theorem, it verifies OpenAI’s separate proof against the exact statement; some files instead configure definitions for comparison by name and type. Each row is the named group’s report. Atlas has not repeated the runs.

These reports do not list the software versions, proof-verification programs, axioms, time or memory in separate fields. Any such details in a report’s prose are reproduced below.

Exact criterion for higher-dimensional symplectic ball packings BallPacking

Two reports, all at the release’s recorded version.

Reported byTheir wordTheir accountDateOriginal report
cert-machine“CERTIFIED”Re-run through Comparator with the independent nanoda kernel switched on: Lean’s kernel and nanoda both accept OpenAI’s solution.10 October 2026Original report
MathVet“comparator-sandboxed-pass”Re-run through Comparator in a sandboxed virtual machine: accepted.8 October 2026Original report

Necessity of the volume and pairwise capacity inequalities BallPackingNecessity

Two reports, all at the release’s recorded version.

Reported byTheir wordTheir accountDateOriginal report
cert-machine“CERTIFIED”Re-run through Comparator with the independent nanoda kernel switched on: Lean’s kernel and nanoda both accept OpenAI’s solution.10 October 2026Original report
MathVet“comparator-sandboxed-pass”Re-run through Comparator in a sandboxed virtual machine: accepted.8 October 2026Original report

What these papers cite in the release, and what cites them

These links come from the papers’ bibliographies. A citation records that one paper cites another; how each cited result is used has not been examined here.

Papers elsewhere in the release that this family’s papers cite

This family’s papers cite no paper elsewhere in the release.

Papers elsewhere in the release that cite this family’s papers

References outside the release

Each paper’s outside references are listed with it on its reading page, where each citation is placed. Every outside work cited in the release: References outside the release

Explain a result, compare statements or propose a correction

Atlas has no contributed explanation for this family yet. You can offer one with a GitHub account. You receive named credit and disclose any AI assistance.

Each button opens a GitHub form with this page and its source version filled in. Opening the form does not reserve the work.

Offer to write an explanationCompare one Lean statement with its paper: BallPacking, BallPackingNecessitySuggest a source attributionSuggest a change

What people have said

Commentary on this family by others, dated and credited. It is commentary, not a finding.

  • An unsigned public tier list, the OpenAI Math Tier List, classes it as a proof and rates its significance, if it holds up, as “Solid publication, could lead to tenure”. The page says that nothing on it is verified.

    Author not stated. Source

Questions awaiting review

Each item identifies a statement, definition or report that needs further review. Its link opens a GitHub form with the source version already recorded.

Read the Lean statement against the paper

  • An AI agent drafted an assessment of which part of the paper this Lean statement expresses. No named human review is recorded. Open the form
  • An AI agent drafted an assessment of which part of the paper this Lean statement expresses. No named human review is recorded. Open the form

Identify the theorem the catalogue describes

  • Family 343 No single paper statement clearly matches OpenAI’s description by wording, and no review identifying the intended theorem is recorded. Open the form

Compare the proposed paper and Lean matches

  • Family 343 Atlas records no review of whether each linked Lean statement and paper theorem mean the same thing. Open the form