Plectis Atlas
Search

↑ and ↓ move, Enter opens, Esc closes.

Show on the map

Smooth isometric immersions of surfaces into ℝ4

OpenAI groups related papers into a “family”. OpenAI’s catalogue describes this one:

Every closed smooth Riemannian surface admits a smooth isometric immersion into ℝ4, resolving the closed-surface form of the four-dimensional isometric-immersion problem. This includes nonorientable surfaces and metrics of arbitrary Gaussian curvature. (OpenAI’s Lean note)

Lean is a language for mathematical statements and proofs that a computer can verify. The assessments below ask whether those statements express the result OpenAI describes here.

Both independent assessments find that the Lean statements express or imply the whole result described above. Read the assessments

The paper states

Theorem 1.1

In Smooth isometric immersions of closed surfaces into Euclidean four-space

Possible match to OpenAI’s description, selected from the papers’ main statements because it shares the most wording. No review confirming the selection is recorded.

Every closed smooth Riemannian surface (M,g) admits a C^\infty isometric immersion into (\R^4,\delta_4), where \delta_4=\sum_{i=1}^4 dx_i^2.

Reported proof verification
One Lean statement in the release; one independent group reports that Comparator accepted a run for this file at the version shown here.

Papers

Each paper opens as a reading page in the browser, with the PDF beside it. The statements each paper opens with are on its reading page.

One Lean statement in this family

Lean is a language for mathematical statements and proofs that a computer can verify. The Lean statement below is shown beside its possible paper counterpart, with the reason they were linked.

For a configured theorem, the Comparator program tests whether OpenAI’s separate proof proves the exact Lean statement using only the allowed axioms. Some statement files instead configure definitions for comparison by name and type. Acceptance does not establish that a formal statement means the same thing as the paper’s theorem.

SurfaceImmersion

The paper states

The words they share: isometric, admits, riemannian, surface, smooth, immersion, space, euclidean, four, closed.

Possible Lean counterpart

Selected from shared wording. No review of whether the statements mean the same thing is recorded.

Smooth isometric immersion of every closed surface into four-space

SurfaceImmersion.lean, the release lists it as a supporting statement.

theorem smooth_isometric_immersion (g : SmoothMetric M) :    ∃ F : M → Space, IsSmoothIsometricImmersion M g F := by  sorry

This file states the theorem with sorry, a placeholder, in place of its proof. OpenAI supplies a separate proof file. Comparator tests whether that proof proves the statement here.

One independent group reports that Comparator accepted a run for this Lean statement file: cert-machine. Who ran the proof-verification program

  • cert-machine records it as “CERTIFIED”.

Read the complete Lean statement

Independent comparisons and proof-verification reports

Does the Lean express the advertised result?

MathVet and cert-machine agree on how much of the advertised result the Lean statements express.

MathVet and Carlos Toledo’s cert-machine independently assessed whether this family’s Lean statements express the whole result OpenAI describes in its catalogue. These are assessments of the family as a whole, not of each paper theorem separately.

MathVet finds that the Lean statements express or imply the whole advertised result (their term: “full”).

Their note: smooth_isometric_immersion (g : SmoothMetric M) : ∃ F : M → ℝ⁴, ContMDiff ∞ F ∧ ∀ p v w, ⟪dF v, dF w⟫ = g.inner p v w for every compact Hausdorff second-countable C^∞ 2-manifold without boundary and every C^∞ Riemannian metric (Mathlib’s ContMDiffRiemannianMetric), with no orientability or curvature hypothesis; ‘immersion’ follows from positive-definiteness (injective differential), and the case is global and closed only, as in the summary.

“full”, in their words: The challenge statements imply the headline claim after unpacking definitions or one routine step.

Their method: An independent, model-assisted, pre-referee reading of each family’s challenge statements against its headline claim under a published rubric (PROTOCOL.md), with its own Comparator runs per challenge.

cert-machine finds that the Lean statements express or imply the whole advertised result (their term: “MATCHES”).

“MATCHES”, in their words: The challenge statements state the headline as OpenAI wrote it.

Their method: Every Comparator challenge re-run on Linux with nanoda switched on, decided by a preregistered rule.

OpenAI’s own note on what its Lean covers

The formalization proves that every closed smooth Riemannian surface admits a smooth isometric immersion into $\mathbb R^4$. The differential preserves the Riemannian inner product on every tangent space. No orientability assumption is imposed, and the statement asks for an immersion rather than an embedding.

AI-drafted comparisons, with no recorded human review

  • Smooth isometric immersion of every closed surface into four-space SurfaceImmersion

    Unreviewed AI draft: states a paper’s theorem as the paper does. States the main theorem: every closed smooth Riemannian surface admits a smooth isometric immersion into R⁴.

Who ran the proof-verification program?

These groups report running Comparator with the release’s Lean statement files. For a configured theorem, it verifies OpenAI’s separate proof against the exact statement; some files instead configure definitions for comparison by name and type. Each row is the named group’s report. Atlas has not repeated the runs.

These reports do not list the software versions, proof-verification programs, axioms, time or memory in separate fields. Any such details in a report’s prose are reproduced below.

Smooth isometric immersion of every closed surface into four-space SurfaceImmersion

One report, at the release’s recorded version.

Reported byTheir wordTheir accountDateOriginal report
cert-machine“CERTIFIED”Re-run through Comparator with the independent nanoda kernel switched on: Lean’s kernel and nanoda both accept OpenAI’s solution.10 October 2026Original report

What these papers cite in the release, and what cites them

These links come from the papers’ bibliographies. A citation records that one paper cites another; how each cited result is used has not been examined here.

Papers elsewhere in the release that cite this family’s papers

No paper elsewhere in the release cites this family’s papers.

References outside the release

Each paper’s outside references are listed with it on its reading page, where each citation is placed. Every outside work cited in the release: References outside the release

Explain a result, compare statements or propose a correction

Atlas has no contributed explanation for this family yet. You can offer one with a GitHub account. You receive named credit and disclose any AI assistance.

Each button opens a GitHub form with this page and its source version filled in. Opening the form does not reserve the work.

Offer to write an explanationCompare the Lean statement with the paperSuggest a source attributionSuggest a change

What people have said

Commentary on this family by others, dated and credited. It is commentary, not a finding.

  • An unsigned public tier list, the OpenAI Math Tier List, classes it as a proof and rates its significance, if it holds up, as “Major math journal”. The page says that nothing on it is verified.

    Author not stated. Source

Questions awaiting review

Each item identifies a statement, definition or report that needs further review. Its link opens a GitHub form with the source version already recorded.

Read the Lean statement against the paper

  • An AI agent drafted an assessment of which part of the paper this Lean statement expresses. No named human review is recorded. Open the form

Identify the theorem the catalogue describes

  • Family 333 The theorem shown was selected from shared wording with OpenAI’s description. Atlas records no review confirming that it is the theorem the description means. Open the form

Compare the proposed paper and Lean matches

  • Family 333 Atlas records no review of whether each linked Lean statement and paper theorem mean the same thing. Open the form