Plectis Atlas
Search

↑ and ↓ move, Enter opens, Esc closes.

Show on the map

Polynomial-time unitary synthesis from a Boolean oracle

OpenAI groups related papers into a “family”. OpenAI’s catalogue describes this one:

Solves the constant-error Aaronson–Kuperberg unitary synthesis problem: a uniform polynomial-size quantum oracle circuit approximates every n-qubit unitary channel within diamond-norm error 1/2, after a suitable Boolean oracle is chosen. Gates, qubits, oracle calls and query length are polynomially bounded. The target-dependent oracle may have an unrestricted truth table; its efficient classical construction is not asserted.

The release has no Lean statement for this family, so there is no formal statement to compare with the result described above.

The paper states

Theorem 1.1 (Polynomial-time unitary synthesis)

In Polynomial-Time Unitary Synthesis from a Boolean Oracle, 5 October 2026

Possible match to OpenAI’s description, selected from the papers’ main statements because it shares the most wording. No review confirming the selection is recorded.

There are a polynomial p and a deterministic classical algorithm which, on input 1^n for any integer n\ge1, outputs in time at most p(n) a quantum oracle circuit A_n with the following properties. The circuit uses the gates H,T,T^\dagger,\mathrm{CNOT} and a single Boolean oracle of input length m(n)\le p(n). Its total number of qubits, elementary gates, and oracle calls are each at most p(n). For every unitary U\in U(2^n) there is a function f:\{0,1\}^{m(n)}\to\{0,1\} for which the output channel \Phi_{n,f} of A_n^{O_f} satisfies

\norm{\Phi_{n,f}-\mathcal U}_\diamond\le\frac12.
Reported proof verification
The release has no Lean statement for this family. The papers are available to read and assess.

Papers

Each paper opens as a reading page in the browser, with the PDF beside it. The statements each paper opens with are on its reading page.

Polynomial-Time Unitary Synthesis from a Boolean Oracle

5 October 2026, current edition.

Read it herePDF

We give a positive answer to the constant-error formulation of the Aaronson–Kuperberg unitary synthesis problem. For every n, a quantum oracle circuit generated in polynomial time from n alone can approximate the channel of every n-qubit unitary to full diamond-norm error at most 1/2, after a suitable Boolean oracle is chosen. Using the fixed gates \(H,T,T^\dagger,\mathrm{CNOT}\), the circuit has polynomially many qubits, elementary gates, and oracle calls, and its oracle queries have polynomial length. The oracle may depend on the target unitary; the theorem does not give an efficient classical procedure for constructing it.

Lean statements

The release has no Lean statement for this family. Its papers remain available to read, and contributors can propose a formal statement of a result. Suggest a change

Independent comparisons and proof-verification reports

Does the Lean express the advertised result?

The release contains no Lean statement for this family, so there is no formal statement to compare with OpenAI’s description.

Explanations by others

Explanations of this family written elsewhere, by the people named. Each is their own reading of the mathematics.

  • Yixin Ma, OpenAI mathematical physics, 25 families: a Chinese guided reading, 7 October 2026. Source

    Chinese guided reading of this family that compares the manuscripts’ main theorems with their abstracts and flags boundary conditions and limit orders that change the physical reading; drafted with Codex and not a re-proof.

What these papers cite in the release, and what cites them

These links come from the papers’ bibliographies. A citation records that one paper cites another; how each cited result is used has not been examined here.

Papers elsewhere in the release that this family’s papers cite

This family’s papers cite no paper elsewhere in the release.

Papers elsewhere in the release that cite this family’s papers

No paper elsewhere in the release cites this family’s papers.

References outside the release

Each paper’s outside references are listed with it on its reading page, where each citation is placed. Every outside work cited in the release: References outside the release

Explain a result, compare statements or propose a correction

Atlas has no contributed explanation for this family yet. You can offer one with a GitHub account. You receive named credit and disclose any AI assistance.

Each button opens a GitHub form with this page and its source version filled in. Opening the form does not reserve the work.

Offer to write an explanationSuggest a source attributionSuggest a change

What people have said

Commentary on this family by others, dated and credited. It is commentary, not a finding.

  • An unsigned public tier list, the OpenAI Math Tier List, classes it as a algorithm and rates its significance, if it holds up, as “Solid publication, could lead to tenure”. The page says that nothing on it is verified.

    Author not stated. Source

  • tparker, Philip Weiss, Will Sawin, Nik Weaver, Pace Nielsen, mathworker21, Joshua P. Swanson, Timothy Chow, Daniel Soltesz, MathOverflow: how many of the released results went against the conventional wisdom?, 10 October 2026. Source

    A reply relays a complexity theorist’s remark that the positive unitary synthesis result is the opposite of what most experts expected.

  • tparker with nine answerers, How many of the results released by OpenAI went against the conventional mathematical wisdom?, 8 October 2026. Source

    Chow notes the positive answer to unitary synthesis goes against what most of the field expected (quoting Aaronson).

  • From scottaaronson.blog, 7 October 2026. Source

    Aaronson calls the positive answer to the unitary synthesis problem the opposite of what most experts expected and points to Dakshita Khurana’s account of working on it.

  • From dakshitakhurana.substack.com, 7 October 2026. Source

    Links Dakshita Khurana’s blog post about their three years on unitary synthesis and their reaction to the AI proof.

Questions awaiting review

Each item identifies a statement, definition or report that needs further review. Its link opens a GitHub form with the source version already recorded.

Identify the theorem the catalogue describes

  • Family 283 The theorem shown was selected from shared wording with OpenAI’s description. Atlas records no review confirming that it is the theorem the description means. Open the form

State the result in Lean

  • Family 283 The release has no Lean statement for this family. Open the form