Plectis Atlas
Search

↑ and ↓ move, Enter opens, Esc closes.

Show on the map

Finite symmetric tensor categories and the Verlinde tower

OpenAI groups related papers into a “family”. OpenAI’s catalogue describes this one:

Proves that every finite symmetric tensor category over an algebraically closed field k of characteristic p > 0 admits a k-linear exact faithful strong symmetric monoidal fiber functor to a higher Verlinde category \(\mathrm{Ver}_{p^n}\). The level may depend on the category, and the theorem includes characteristic two, resolving the finite case of the Benson–Etingof–Ostrik conjecture.

The release has no Lean statement for this family, so there is no formal statement to compare with the result described above.

The paper states

Theorem 1.1

In Fiber functors for finite symmetric tensor categories in positive characteristic, 24 September 2026

Possible match to OpenAI’s description, selected from the papers’ main statements because it shares the most wording. No review confirming the selection is recorded.

For every prime p, every algebraically closed field k of characteristic p, and every finite symmetric tensor category \mathcal C over k, there are an integer n\geq1 and a fiber functor

\mathcal C\longrightarrow\operatorname{Ver}_{p^n}(k).
Reported proof verification
The release has no Lean statement for this family. The papers are available to read and assess.

Papers

Each paper opens as a reading page in the browser, with the PDF beside it. The statements each paper opens with are on its reading page.

Fiber functors for finite symmetric tensor categories in positive characteristic

24 September 2026, current edition.

Read it herePDF

We prove the finite case of the Benson–Etingof–Ostrik conjecture: every finite symmetric tensor category over an algebraically closed field k of characteristic p > 0 admits a k-linear exact faithful strong symmetric monoidal functor to a finite higher Verlinde category \(\mathop{\mathrm{Ver}}\nolimits _{p^n}(k)\). The result includes characteristic two, and the level n may depend on the category.

Lean statements

The release has no Lean statement for this family. Its papers remain available to read, and contributors can propose a formal statement of a result. Suggest a change

Independent comparisons and proof-verification reports

Does the Lean express the advertised result?

The release contains no Lean statement for this family, so there is no formal statement to compare with OpenAI’s description.

What these papers cite in the release, and what cites them

These links come from the papers’ bibliographies. A citation records that one paper cites another; how each cited result is used has not been examined here.

Papers elsewhere in the release that this family’s papers cite

This family’s papers cite no paper elsewhere in the release.

Papers elsewhere in the release that cite this family’s papers

No paper elsewhere in the release cites this family’s papers.

References outside the release

Each paper’s outside references are listed with it on its reading page, where each citation is placed. Every outside work cited in the release: References outside the release

Explain a result, compare statements or propose a correction

Atlas has no contributed explanation for this family yet. You can offer one with a GitHub account. You receive named credit and disclose any AI assistance.

Each button opens a GitHub form with this page and its source version filled in. Opening the form does not reserve the work.

Offer to write an explanationSuggest a source attributionSuggest a change

What people have said

Commentary on this family by others, dated and credited. It is commentary, not a finding.

  • An unsigned public tier list, the OpenAI Math Tier List, classes it as a proof and rates its significance, if it holds up, as “Solid publication, could lead to tenure”. The page says that nothing on it is verified.

    Author not stated. Source

Questions awaiting review

Each item identifies a statement, definition or report that needs further review. Its link opens a GitHub form with the source version already recorded.

Identify the theorem the catalogue describes

  • Family 208 The theorem shown was selected from shared wording with OpenAI’s description. Atlas records no review confirming that it is the theorem the description means. Open the form

State the result in Lean

  • Family 208 The release has no Lean statement for this family. Open the form