Plectis Atlas
Search

↑ and ↓ move, Enter opens, Esc closes.

Show on the map

Correspondence coloring with a fixed forbidden subgraph

OpenAI groups related papers into a “family”. OpenAI’s catalogue describes this one:

Proves the Alon–Krivelevich–Sudakov coloring conjecture in correspondence-coloring form: graphs avoiding any fixed subgraph F need \(O_F(\Delta/\log\Delta)\) colors when their maximum degree Δ is sufficiently large. Also proves the Ajtai–Erdős–Komlós–Szemerédi independence conjecture: for fixed r ≥ 4, every n-vertex Kr-free graph of average degree d ≥ 2 has an independent set of size \(\Omega_r(n\log d/d)\). (OpenAI’s Lean note)

Lean is a language for mathematical statements and proofs that a computer can verify. The assessments below ask whether those statements express the result OpenAI describes here.

The independent assessments find that the Lean statements express only part of the result described above, or a narrower statement. Read the assessments

It bears on Erdős problem #802, as listed by Thomas Bloom, erdosproblems.com.

What the papers state

Theorem 1.1

In Correspondence coloring graphs with a forbidden clique, 5 October 2026

Possible match to OpenAI’s description, selected from shared wording. No review confirming the selection is recorded.

For every integer r\ge4 there are constants C_r>0 and \Delta_r\ge3 such that every K_r-free graph G of maximum degree \Delta\ge\Delta_r satisfies

\chi_{\mathrm{DP}}(G) \le \left\lceil C_r\frac{\Delta}{\log\Delta}\right\rceil.

The constants depend only on r.

No Lean statement in the release is paired with this theorem.

Corollary 1.2

In Correspondence coloring graphs with a forbidden clique, 5 October 2026

Possible match to OpenAI’s description, selected from shared wording. No review confirming the selection is recorded.

For every finite graph F there are constants C_F>0 and \Delta_F\ge3 such that every F-free graph G of maximum degree \Delta\ge\Delta_F satisfies

\chi_{\mathrm{DP}}(G) \le \left\lceil C_F\frac{\Delta}{\log\Delta}\right\rceil.

No Lean statement in the release is paired with this theorem.

The release does not say which paper theorem its catalogue describes. The statements above share the most wording with the description; the atlas has not reviewed that choice. Identifying it is listed under Questions awaiting review.

Reported proof verification
One Lean statement in the release; three independent groups report that Comparator accepted runs for this file at the version shown here.

Papers

Each paper opens as a reading page in the browser, with the PDF beside it. The statements each paper opens with are on its reading page.

Correspondence coloring graphs with a forbidden clique

5 October 2026, current edition.

Read it herePDF

For every fixed integer r ≥ 4, we prove that every Kr-free graph of sufficiently large maximum degree Δ has correspondence chromatic number \(O_r(\Delta/\log\Delta)\). This resolves the Alon–Krivelevich–Sudakov coloring conjecture in the stronger correspondence-coloring form. The same bound, with a constant depending on F, holds when any fixed graph F is excluded as an ordinary subgraph. Ordinary and list coloring satisfy the same bounds.

A logarithmic independence bound for clique-free graphs

25 September 2026, current edition.

Read it herePDF

For every fixed integer r ≥ 4, every Kr-free graph on n vertices with average degree d ≥ 2 has an independent set of size at least \(c_r n\log d/d\), where \(c_r\gt 0\) depends only on r. This proves the fixed-clique-size independence conjecture of Ajtai, Erdős, Komlós and Szemerédi.

One Lean statement in this family

Lean is a language for mathematical statements and proofs that a computer can verify. The Lean statement below is shown beside its possible paper counterpart, with the reason they were linked.

For a configured theorem, the Comparator program tests whether OpenAI’s separate proof proves the exact Lean statement using only the allowed axioms. Some statement files instead configure definitions for comparison by name and type. Acceptance does not establish that a formal statement means the same thing as the paper’s theorem.

CliqueFreeLog

The paper states

The words they share: average, simple, integer, degree, free, finite, log, graph, logarithmic, independence, clique, bound, vertices, constant.

Possible Lean counterpart

Selected from shared wording. No review of whether the statements mean the same thing is recorded.

Logarithmic independence bound for clique-free graphs

CliqueFreeLog.lean, the release lists it as a main result.

theorem logarithmic_independence_bound (r : ℕ) (hr : 4 ≤ r) :    ∃ c : ℝ, 0 < c ∧      ∀ {V : Type} [Fintype V] (G : SimpleGraph V),        G.CliqueFree r → 2 ≤ averageDegree G →        c * (Fintype.card V : ℝ) * Real.log (averageDegree G) / averageDegree G ≤          (G.indepNum : ℝ) := by  sorry

This file states the theorem with sorry, a placeholder, in place of its proof. OpenAI supplies a separate proof file. Comparator tests whether that proof proves the statement here.

three independent groups report that Comparator accepted runs for this Lean statement file: cert-machine; MathVet; Neal McBurnett, openai-math-lean-tooling. Who ran the proof-verification program

  • cert-machine records it as “CERTIFIED”.
  • MathVet records it as “comparator-sandboxed-pass”.
  • Neal McBurnett, openai-math-lean-tooling records it as “accepted”.

Read the complete Lean statement

Independent comparisons and proof-verification reports

Does the Lean express the advertised result?

Neither group finds that the Lean statements express or imply the whole advertised result. They describe what the statements express in different terms.

MathVet and Carlos Toledo’s cert-machine independently assessed whether this family’s Lean statements express the whole result OpenAI describes in its catalogue. These are assessments of the family as a whole, not of each paper theorem separately.

MathVet finds that the Lean statements express part of the advertised result (their term: “partial”).

Their note: PRIMARY CLAIM NOT STATED (only a secondary result is formalized). Only the independence half is stated: logarithmic_independence_bound (r) (hr : 4 ≤ r) : ∃ c > 0, ∀ G, G.CliqueFree r → 2 ≤ averageDegree G → c * n * log d / d ≤ G.indepNum (averageDegree = 2|E|/|V|). The summary’s first and primary claim, the Alon-Krivelevich-Sudakov coloring conjecture in correspondence-coloring form (O_F(Δ/log Δ) colors for any fixed forbidden subgraph F), has no Lean statement, and the docs scope also only mentions the independence bound.

“partial”, in their words: Only a special case is stated, or a co-equal headline claim has no challenge statement.

Their method: An independent, model-assisted, pre-referee reading of each family’s challenge statements against its headline claim under a published rubric (PROTOCOL.md), with its own Comparator runs per challenge.

cert-machine finds that the Lean statements express a narrower statement than the advertised result (their term: “NARROWER — UNLINKED”).

The gap they name: The correspondence-coloring theorem (χ_DP = O_F(Δ/log Δ) for F-free graphs of large maximum degree), the headline’s first clause, is not stated.

“NARROWER — UNLINKED”, in their words: The challenge statements state less than the headline; the missing part comes from a paper the Lean note does not link.

Their method: Every Comparator challenge re-run on Linux with nanoda switched on, decided by a preregistered rule.

OpenAI’s own note on what its Lean covers

The formalized result gives a logarithmic improvement in the independence number of clique-free graphs. For every fixed integer $r\ge4$, there is $c_r>0$ such that every finite $K_r$-free simple graph on $n$ vertices with average degree $d\ge2$ has an independent set of size at least $c_r n\log d/d$. The constant depends only on $r$.

AI-drafted comparisons, with no recorded human review

  • Logarithmic independence bound for clique-free graphs CliqueFreeLog

    Unreviewed AI draft: states a paper’s theorem as the paper does. States the main theorem: for each r ≥ 4, every K_r-free graph with average degree d ≥ 2 has an independent set of size at least c_r n log d/d. The correspondence-colouring result of the family’s later paper is not part of the statement.

Who ran the proof-verification program?

These groups report running Comparator with the release’s Lean statement files. For a configured theorem, it verifies OpenAI’s separate proof against the exact statement; some files instead configure definitions for comparison by name and type. Each row is the named group’s report. Atlas has not repeated the runs.

These reports do not list the software versions, proof-verification programs, axioms, time or memory in separate fields. Any such details in a report’s prose are reproduced below.

Logarithmic independence bound for clique-free graphs CliqueFreeLog

Three reports, all at the release’s recorded version.

Reported byTheir wordTheir accountDateOriginal report
cert-machine“CERTIFIED”Re-run through Comparator with the independent nanoda kernel switched on: Lean’s kernel and nanoda both accept OpenAI’s solution.10 October 2026Original report
MathVet“comparator-sandboxed-pass”Re-run through Comparator in a sandboxed virtual machine: accepted.8 October 2026Original report
Neal McBurnett, openai-math-lean-tooling“accepted”Re-run through Comparator with Lean’s kernel: accepted (the check took 358 s; peak memory 6.3 GiB).11 October 2026Original report

What these papers cite in the release, and what cites them

These links come from the papers’ bibliographies. A citation records that one paper cites another; how each cited result is used has not been examined here.

Within this family

Papers elsewhere in the release that cite this family’s papers

No paper elsewhere in the release cites this family’s papers.

Follow-up work by others

  • The Justin Sun Prize, The Justin Sun Prize: problem bank and award records, 11 October 2026. Source

    JSP-000659 lists the release’s claim as Solved with independent mathematical review pending; Lean proof column: reported complete, independent verification pending.

References outside the release

Each paper’s outside references are listed with it on its reading page, where each citation is placed. Every outside work cited in the release: References outside the release

Explain a result, compare statements or propose a correction

Atlas has no contributed explanation for this family yet. You can offer one with a GitHub account. You receive named credit and disclose any AI assistance.

Each button opens a GitHub form with this page and its source version filled in. Opening the form does not reserve the work.

Offer to write an explanationCompare the Lean statement with the paperSuggest a source attributionSuggest a change

What people have said

Commentary on this family by others, dated and credited. It is commentary, not a finding.

  • An unsigned public tier list, the OpenAI Math Tier List, classes it as a proof and rates its significance, if it holds up, as “Major math journal”. The page says that nothing on it is verified.

    Author not stated. Source

  • Thomas Bloom, Erdős problems in the OpenAI proofs, 8 October 2026. Source

    Bloom lists Erdős 802 (independent sets in clique-free graphs), names Shearer and Ajtai, Erdős, Komlós and Szemerédi, and links the formalisation.

Questions awaiting review

Each item identifies a statement, definition or report that needs further review. Its link opens a GitHub form with the source version already recorded.

Read the Lean statement against the paper

  • An AI agent drafted an assessment of which part of the paper this Lean statement expresses. No named human review is recorded. Open the form

Identify the theorem the catalogue describes

  • Family 184 No single paper statement clearly matches OpenAI’s description by wording, and no review identifying the intended theorem is recorded. Open the form

Compare the proposed paper and Lean matches

  • Family 184 Atlas records no review of whether each linked Lean statement and paper theorem mean the same thing. Open the form