Plectis Atlas
Search

↑ and ↓ move, Enter opens, Esc closes.

Shafarevich counterexamples in dimension two and with large fundamental group

OpenAI groups related papers into a “family”. OpenAI’s catalogue describes this one:

Constructs a smooth projective complex fourfold with large fundamental group whose universal cover contains no positive-dimensional compact analytic subvariety but is neither Stein nor holomorphically convex. A separate smooth projective complex surface already disproves unrestricted Shafarevich holomorphic convexity in dimension two.

The release has no Lean statement for this family, so there is no formal statement to compare with the result described above.

What the papers state

Theorem 1.1

In A projective fourfold with large fundamental group and non-Stein universal cover, 5 October 2026

Possible match to OpenAI’s description, selected from the papers’ main statements because it shares the most wording. No review confirming the selection is recorded.

There exist a smooth connected projective complex fourfold X and a simple abelian surface A\subset X such that

  1. 1.

    X has large fundamental group;

  2. 2.

    \im\bigl(\pi_1(A)\to\pi_1(X)\bigr)\simeq\Z.

The universal cover \widetilde X contains no positive-dimensional compact complex analytic subvariety and is not Stein.

Theorem 1.1

In A surface counterexample to Shafarevich holomorphic convexity, 23 September 2026

The paper’s main theorem is shown as a possible match to OpenAI’s description. No review confirming the selection is recorded.

There is a smooth connected projective complex surface X containing a connected nodal curve Z_0 with smooth rational irreducible components such that

\im\bigl(\pi_1(Z_0)\longrightarrow\pi_1(X)\bigr) \quad\text{is infinite}.

In the simply connected universal cover of X, a connected component above Z_0 is a closed, connected, noncompact, locally finite union of compact rational curves. The holomorphic hull of any one of its points is noncompact. In particular, this universal cover is not holomorphically convex.

The release does not say which paper theorem its catalogue describes. Both statements above are shown whole, the closer match to the description’s wording first. The atlas has not reviewed either choice.

Reported proof verification
The release has no Lean statement for this family. The papers are available to read and assess.

Papers

Each paper opens as a reading page in the browser, with the PDF beside it. The statements each paper opens with are on its reading page.

Lean statements

The release has no Lean statement for this family. Its papers remain available to read, and contributors can propose a formal statement of a result. Suggest a change

Independent comparisons and proof-verification reports

Does the Lean express the advertised result?

The release contains no Lean statement for this family, so there is no formal statement to compare with OpenAI’s description.

What these papers cite in the release, and what cites them

These links come from the papers’ bibliographies. A citation records that one paper cites another; how each cited result is used has not been examined here.

References outside the release

Each paper’s outside references are listed with it on its reading page, where each citation is placed. Every outside work cited in the release: References outside the release

Explain a result, compare statements or propose a correction

Atlas has no contributed explanation for this family yet. You can offer one with a GitHub account. You receive named credit and disclose any AI assistance.

Each button opens a GitHub form with this page and its source version filled in. Opening the form does not reserve the work.

Offer to write an explanationSuggest a source attributionSuggest a change

What people have said

Commentary on this family by others, dated and credited. It is commentary, not a finding.

  • An unsigned public tier list, the OpenAI Math Tier List, classes it as a counterexample and rates its significance, if it holds up, as “Career-defining publication”. The page says that nothing on it is verified.

    Author not stated. Source

Questions awaiting review

Each item identifies a statement, definition or report that needs further review. Its link opens a GitHub form with the source version already recorded.

Identify the theorem the catalogue describes

  • Family 046 The theorem shown was selected from shared wording with OpenAI’s description. Atlas records no review confirming that it is the theorem the description means. Open the form

State the result in Lean

  • Family 046 The release has no Lean statement for this family. Open the form