OpenAI groups related papers into a “family”. OpenAI’s catalogue describes this one:
Proves Bloch’s conjecture: for every smooth connected projective complex surface S with \(p_g(S)=0\), the Albanese map \(\mathrm{CH}_0(S)^0\to\mathrm{Alb}(S)(\mathbb C)\) on integral degree-zero zero-cycles is an isomorphism. This combines the new \(p_g=q=0\) theorem with the classical theorem of Bloch, Kas, and Lieberman.
The release has no Lean statement for this family, so there is no formal statement to compare with the result described above.
Possible match to OpenAI’s description, selected because it shares the most wording. No review confirming the selection is recorded.
Let S be a smooth connected projective surface over \mathbb C with p_g(S)=0. Then the Albanese homomorphism
\operatorname{alb}_S:\CH_0(S)^0\longrightarrow\Alb(S)(\mathbb C)
is an isomorphism of abelian groups, where \CH_0(S) has integral coefficients.
The release does not say which paper theorem its catalogue describes. Both statements above are shown whole: the paper’s main theorem first, then the statement that shares the most wording with the description. The atlas has not reviewed either choice.
One more possible match
Corollary 1.3(Motivic consequences)in Bloch’s conjecture for surfaces with p_g=0, 24 September 2026.
Reported proof verification
The release has no Lean statement for this family. The papers are available to read and assess.
We prove Bloch’s conjecture for smooth connected projective complex surfaces with \(p_g=0\): the Albanese homomorphism on integral degree-zero zero-cycles is an isomorphism.
Lean statements
The release has no Lean statement for this family. Its papers remain available to read, and contributors can propose a formal statement of a result. Suggest a change
Independent comparisons and proof-verification reports
Does the Lean express the advertised result?
The release contains no Lean statement for this family, so there is no formal statement to compare with OpenAI’s description.
What these papers cite in the release, and what cites them
These links come from the papers’ bibliographies. A citation records that one paper cites another; how each cited result is used has not been examined here.
Papers elsewhere in the release that this family’s papers cite
This family’s papers cite no paper elsewhere in the release.
Papers elsewhere in the release that cite this family’s papers
No paper elsewhere in the release cites this family’s papers.
References outside the release
Each paper’s outside references are listed with it on its reading page, where each citation is placed. Every outside work cited in the release: References outside the release
Explain a result, compare statements or propose a correction
Atlas has no contributed explanation for this family yet. You can offer one with a GitHub account. You receive named credit and disclose any AI assistance.
Each button opens a GitHub form with this page and its source version filled in. Opening the form does not reserve the work.
Commentary on this family by others, dated and credited. It is commentary, not a finding.
An unsigned public tier list, the OpenAI Math Tier List, classes it as a proof and rates its significance, if it holds up, as “Career-defining publication”. The page says that nothing on it is verified.
Simon Pepin Lehalleur, Posts on the Kuga-Satake algebraicity and Bloch conjecture papers, 7 October 2026. Source
Superficial reading: the Bloch conjecture proof for surfaces with p_g = 0 is substantial progress on cycles on surfaces but not a general codimension-2 insight.
Questions awaiting review
Each item identifies a statement, definition or report that needs further review. Its link opens a GitHub form with the source version already recorded.
Identify the theorem the catalogue describes
Family 040The theorem shown was selected from shared wording with OpenAI’s description. Atlas records no review confirming that it is the theorem the description means.Open the form
State the result in Lean
Family 040The release has no Lean statement for this family.Open the form
Why this passage is shown
Theorem 1.1
In Bloch’s conjecture for surfaces with p_g=0, 24 September 2026
How it was found
Its words were compared with the words of OpenAI’s catalogue description.