OpenAI groups related papers into a “family”. OpenAI’s catalogue describes this one:
Answers Jacobsthal’s quadratic-bound question: every interval of \(Ck^2\) consecutive integers contains an integer coprime to any prescribed positive integer with at most k distinct prime divisors, for an absolute constant C. The bound is uniform over prime sets and interval positions and removes the classical logarithmic loss. (OpenAI’s Lean note)
Lean is a language for mathematical statements and proofs that a computer can verify. The assessments below ask whether those statements express the result OpenAI describes here.
Both independent assessments find that the Lean statements express or imply the whole result described above.Read the assessments
Possible match to OpenAI’s description, selected from the papers’ main statements because it shares the most wording. No review confirming the selection is recorded.
There is an absolute constant C>0 such that
h(k)\le C\frac{k^2}{(\log\log(3k))^2}
\qquad\text{for every integer }k\ge1.
Possible match to OpenAI’s description, selected from shared wording. No review confirming the selection is recorded.
There are absolute constants c>0 and z_0 with the following property. For every real z\ge z_0 and every choice of a residue class a_p\pmod p for each prime p\le z,
\#\{1\le n\le Y:n\not\equiv a_p\pmod p\text{ for every }p\le z\}
\ge c\frac{YV_0}{B^2}.
No Lean statement in the release is paired with this theorem.
The release does not say which paper theorem its catalogue describes. Both statements above are shown whole: the paper’s main theorem first, then the statement that shares the most wording with the description. The atlas has not reviewed either choice.
Reported proof verification
Two Lean statements in the release; one independent group reports that Comparator accepted runs for all these files at the version shown here.
Let \(h(k)\) be the least integer such that every interval of \(h(k)\) consecutive integers contains an integer coprime to any prescribed positive integer having at most k distinct prime divisors. We prove \(h(k)\ll k^2/(\log\log(3k))^2\), giving an affirmative answer to Jacobsthal’s quadratic-bound question.
Two Lean statements in this family
Choose one to see it beside the paper theorem it is paired with.
For a configured theorem, the Comparator program tests whether OpenAI’s separate proof proves the exact Lean statement using only the allowed axioms. Some statement files instead configure definitions for comparison by name and type. Acceptance does not establish that a formal statement means the same thing as the paper’s theorem.
Jacobsthal.lean, the release lists it as a main result.
defJacobsthalQuadratic : Prop := ∃ C : ℝ, 0 < C ∧ ∀ k : ℕ, 0 < k → ∃ m : ℕ, IsJacobsthalBound k m ∧ (m : ℝ) ≤ C * (k : ℝ) ^ 2⋮theoremerdos_970_quadratic : NumberTheoryLean.Targets.JacobsthalQuadratic := bysorry
This file states the theorem with sorry, a placeholder, in place of its proof. OpenAI supplies a separate proof file. Comparator tests whether that proof proves the statement here.
JacobsthalImproved.lean, the release lists it as a supporting statement.
defJacobsthalIteratedLog : Prop := ∃ C : ℝ, 0 < C ∧ ∀ k : ℕ, 0 < k → ∃ m : ℕ, IsJacobsthalBound k m ∧ (m : ℝ) ≤ C * (k : ℝ) ^ 2 / (Real.log (Real.log (3 * (k : ℝ)))) ^ 2⋮theoremerdos_970_iterated_log : NumberTheoryLean.Targets.JacobsthalIteratedLog := bysorry
This file states the theorem with sorry, a placeholder, in place of its proof. OpenAI supplies a separate proof file. Comparator tests whether that proof proves the statement here.
Other mathematical statements in OpenAI’s Lean library
Atlas found these propositions by scanning the text of the project’s Model.lean file. Each name links to its definition, with any associated statement file beside it. This list does not record running Lean to interpret or verify those definitions.
Independent comparisons and proof-verification reports
Does the Lean express the advertised result?
MathVet and cert-machine agree on how much of the advertised result the Lean statements express.
MathVet and Carlos Toledo’s cert-machine independently assessed whether this family’s Lean statements express the whole result OpenAI describes in its catalogue. These are assessments of the family as a whole, not of each paper theorem separately.
MathVet finds that the Lean statements express or imply the whole advertised result (their term: “full”).
Their note:None; both the quadratic and the (log log 3k)^-2 improved bound are stated with elementary definitions.
“full”, in their words: The challenge statements imply the headline claim after unpacking definitions or one routine step.
Their method: An independent, model-assisted, pre-referee reading of each family’s challenge statements against its headline claim under a published rubric (PROTOCOL.md), with its own Comparator runs per challenge.
Let $h(k)$ be the least interval length that guarantees an integer coprime to any prescribed positive modulus with at most $k$ distinct prime factors. The formalization proves the paper’s strengthened Jacobsthal bound $h(k)\le Ck^2/(\log\log(3k))^2$ for one absolute $C>0$ and every $k\ge1$. Intervals may begin at any signed integer. The earlier quadratic bound is also retained as a separate statement; the optimal order of growth is not determined.
AI-drafted comparisons, with no recorded human review
Quadratic Jacobsthal boundJacobsthal
Unreviewed AI draft: states a weaker form of a paper’s theorem. States the earlier quadratic bound h(k) ≤ Ck², which the main theorem improves by the factor (log log 3k)²; the note keeps it as a separate statement.
Jacobsthal bound with an iterated-logarithm savingJacobsthalImproved
Unreviewed AI draft: states a paper’s theorem as the paper does. States the main theorem h(k) ≤ Ck²/(log log 3k)² for every k ≥ 1, with intervals allowed to start at any integer.
Who ran the proof-verification program?
These groups report running Comparator with the release’s Lean statement files. For a configured theorem, it verifies OpenAI’s separate proof against the exact statement; some files instead configure definitions for comparison by name and type. Each row is the named group’s report. Atlas has not repeated the runs.
These reports do not list the software versions, proof-verification programs, axioms, time or memory in separate fields. Any such details in a report’s prose are reproduced below.
Quadratic Jacobsthal boundJacobsthal
One report, at the release’s recorded version.
Reported by
Their word
Their account
Date
Original report
cert-machine
“CERTIFIED”
Re-run through Comparator with the independent nanoda kernel switched on: Lean’s kernel and nanoda both accept OpenAI’s solution.
Explanations of this family written elsewhere, by the people named. Each is their own reading of the mathematics.
mo271, GreensOpenProblems/46: green_46.improve_upper is answered by the improved Jacobsthal bound (issue 6908), 7 October 2026. Source
The quadratic Jacobsthal bound h(k) << k^2/(log log 3k)^2 answers the open upper-bound variant.
What these papers cite in the release, and what cites them
These links come from the papers’ bibliographies. A citation records that one paper cites another; how each cited result is used has not been examined here.
Papers elsewhere in the release that this family’s papers cite
This family’s papers cite no paper elsewhere in the release.
Papers elsewhere in the release that cite this family’s papers
No paper elsewhere in the release cites this family’s papers.
Follow-up work by others
Luka Carroll, Murray Elder, Testing epimorphism onto the bicyclic monoid is $\mathsf{NP}$-complete, 6 October 2026. Source
Carroll and Elder remark that substituting OpenAI’s quadratic bound for Jacobsthal’s function would improve the exponent in their Theorem C, but they leave their weaker bound in place.
References outside the release
Each paper’s outside references are listed with it on its reading page, where each citation is placed. Every outside work cited in the release: References outside the release
Explain a result, compare statements or propose a correction
Atlas has no contributed explanation for this family yet. You can offer one with a GitHub account. You receive named credit and disclose any AI assistance.
Each button opens a GitHub form with this page and its source version filled in. Opening the form does not reserve the work.
Commentary on this family by others, dated and credited. It is commentary, not a finding.
An unsigned public tier list, the OpenAI Math Tier List, classes it as a proof and rates its significance, if it holds up, as “Major math journal”. The page says that nothing on it is verified.
Moritz Firsching, anxkhn, Paul Lezeau, Formal Conjectures: mark problems solved in the OpenAI math release and link formal proofs, 11 October 2026. Source
A Formal Conjectures maintainer, after source inspection, links the Jacobsthal bounds to Erdos problem 970 and adds an iterated-log variant.
eigendash, eigendash/openai-math-visualised: numerical probes of seven result families, 8 October 2026. Source
For the primorials P_k with k up to 10, the ratio of Jacobsthal’s function to k^2/(log log 3k)^2 rises to about 0.71 and then stays flat, consistent with the quadratic bound over that small range.
Thomas Bloom, Erdős problems in the OpenAI proofs, 8 October 2026. Source
Bloom lists Erdős 970 (a quadratic-type bound for Jacobsthal’s function), names Iwaniec’s earlier bound, and links the formalisation.
Questions awaiting review
Each item identifies a statement, definition or report that needs further review. Its link opens a GitHub form with the source version already recorded.
Read the Lean statement against the paper
An AI agent drafted an assessment of which part of the paper this Lean statement expresses. No named human review is recorded.Open the form
An AI agent drafted an assessment of which part of the paper this Lean statement expresses. No named human review is recorded.Open the form
Identify the theorem the catalogue describes
Family 021The theorem shown was selected from shared wording with OpenAI’s description. Atlas records no review confirming that it is the theorem the description means.Open the form
Compare the proposed paper and Lean matches
Family 021Atlas records no review of whether each linked Lean statement and paper theorem mean the same thing.Open the form
Why this passage is shown
Theorem 1.1
In A quadratic bound for Jacobsthal’s function
How it was found
Its words were compared with the words of OpenAI’s catalogue description.
Words they share
absolute, constant, integer
Review
Atlas records no review confirming that this is the theorem OpenAI’s description refers to.
The challenge statements imply the headline claim after unpacking definitions or one routine step.
Their method
An independent, model-assisted, pre-referee reading of each family’s challenge statements against its headline claim under a published rubric (PROTOCOL.md), with its own Comparator runs per challenge. Its protocol describes a planned error-rate study; this import does not establish that the study has been completed.
The challenge statements state the headline as OpenAI wrote it.
Their method
Every Comparator challenge re-run on Linux with nanoda switched on, decided by a preregistered rule; every family’s challenge statements read against OpenAI’s headline, clause by clause. Decider: Comparator (leanprover/comparator d03acab1 = tag v4.34.0, built with the release’s toolchain v4.34.1), lean4export 076e8e57, landrun 811cfff5, nanoda_lib 3a240721 — on GitHub’s Linux runners…